This will be Edifier Fan Club Version 3! Thanks to all of your support.

Continued from the previous topic, Edifier Fan Club V2.
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/111058

Fans of Edifier speaker systems.

Discuss it out here and be proud of what you have. ~~ B)

Just bought the Edifier speaker stand... and I posted a pic on that in another thread. Happy with the stand as it compliments the Edifier speaker set I have.

This post has been edited by Silfrijin: Dec 27 2006, 07:10 PM

For I, i have tested all many times, although not side by side but i think i have a deep impress about each of it. The klipsch GMX 2.1 really pawn all the other speaker in the list. if u are bass oriented more than mid and high,
i would say u already have the best multimedia speaker in current market. if u insist to looking for upgrade, i suggest u wait for Edifier S2.1MKII, this is the only speaker mayb can pawn GMX in the sence of good powerful tight bass. if u are more focus on mid and high while still looking for some good quality bass, i suggest u go for AegoM, the best vocal speaker ever~.

For II, according to ur requirement(in clarity-more focus, bass, performance/price ratio), IMO M3300 is the best choice. unless u are bass head, not care much about clarity and tighter bass, then ATP3 will more suit for u.

my conclusion, upgrade or downgrade to any of the speaker in the list u mention is not recommended, because is really wasting money, i doubt u wont get a better sound enjoy experience. i suggest u go for either S2.1MKII, or AegoM, or hifi level speaker like a good amp + a pair of bookshelf or floorstander. u will feel like step into heaven.

This post has been edited by Genius2006: Dec 27 2006, 08:55 PM

IMHO Klipsch Promedia GMX A-2.1 is not that good. Disco type bass for basshead, missing midrange and very bright sound are what you can get from it. And anyone of the speakers in "section I" pawn GMX A-2.1.

have u seriously done a detail test on it? for eg quiet environment and good source
and fine turn the sub volumn until the best position, or even replace the speaker cable? if say this is disco type speaker that was not wrong, its bass really very tight, powerful and punchy. but missing midrange and sound bright i cant agree with this, i dun see it is over bright and missing midrange after pair with good sound card and replace the stock cable. it should be suitable for listen other type of song also.

This post has been edited by Genius2006: Dec 27 2006, 09:43 PM

lol, I was waiting for your reply.
No offense, just sharing my opinion here.

I have tested the GMX A-2.1 with Philips PSC 805, Prodigy 7.1 LT, Chaintech AV-710 and Audigy 2 ZS. All these sound card are considered a quite a good source for this speaker. Mostly test it with high bit rate mp3 and some .ape, .wav format songs. Testing enviroment is in my room, mostly at night which is "quite". Beside that, the Klipsch GMX A-2.1 is consider burn in already since it has been used for year. The bass contoller was set depends on the type of the songs, some songs need more bass while somes need slightly lesser.

First of all, the bass is considered powerful, but most of the songs don't need that kind of disco, heart punching type bass. Regarding to the missing midrange, don't you feel like you are listening to the songs in a "tin can"? It sound hollow and thin.
And lastly the brightness, it is so bright untill I can't even sit in front of it for more than 15 minutes. Btw, the satellites was placed approximately 26" apart and 24" from listening position. For subwoofer, I have tried placing it near the wall and also not so near to the wall. Overall, "it is not that good". I used to have a Edifier S 4.1 which pawn this GMX A-2.1 anytime. Wait, except the disco type bass when listening to those techno/disco type songs.

nice reply i appreciate ur opinion exchange
anyway, i am not GMX owner, just test it at fren side. he replace the stock cable and pair it with x-fi. seriously i dun feel it is sound over bright and like a tin can, mayb because x-fi is warm sound card, it compliment the brightness of the speaker. further more my fren replace the very thin stock cable with a thicker and lower impedence cable, thus it cause a better dumping effect from the sub to the satelite. last time i own S2.1 too, i presume s2.1 should almost the same with s4.1? i did feel my fren GMX own my s2.1. i think u r right, mayb just we are not the same testing environment bah, or mayb i am not gmx user, not really use it very long time.
no offence, just my dua puluh cent

This post has been edited by Genius2006: Dec 27 2006, 10:40 PM

@Xeon, Genius Thx for your reply

but being a owner of GMX 2.1 i think that i tilt to Genius2006's evaluation. Maybe the bass overwhelms the treble in some kinds of music but the overall performance is great with a little adjustment.

In the section I as i mentioned above, i've never tested Edifier 2.1D so i dont know what to say about it.... For the rest i think Cs -21 wont stand a chance in comparison to GMX. The MX 5021 is somehow the real competitor to my hero GMX but i prefer GMX.

I divided those speakers into two groups mainly just because their price ...the 1st group is > 100$ and the second one is < 50$ and their power (RMS) too. Doubtlessly, the 2nd group has less power than 1st one.

I'm living @ my university's dormitory with 3 students. My GMX rarely raises it's voice because it usually annoys my friends (so loud). So i'm thinking something else that has less power but fair in performance (which is not too bad in comparison to my GMX). Maybe after the deal, i will have some extra money...(hix i'm planning downgrade my speaker when everybody want to upgrade ...)

So, should i go for AL ATP3 or Edifier M3300 (3310 or 3400-these models are available in my local warehouses ) ? How good are they ? (i'm afraid of selling them instantly when i get 1 of them shipped !)

This post has been edited by blurrystart: Dec 28 2006, 12:17 AM

im just thinking to change to audigy 2 coz they told upgrade to zs not improving a lot and just enrich the sound...but since i want to change the sound card is okay to try a2zs if i can get wat i want

will try to put a cloth a hole ...will post the result... about sealing the speaker..i think better to change the sound card first.

Me using R1900TIII, I wound say it is good for those looking for vocal or audiophile listner. I intend to buy bcoz I love vocal songs. For tehcno this is not for your choice.
Any idea where I can add an active sub combine with these speaker, I find it lack of bass when coming to DVD.

yeap!!!if i got more money i would like to try S2000!!!
lack of bass because there is no subwoofer for it...
for movies and budget one i would recommend R501 MKII...

yupe..
S2000 is really a nice set of speaker..
can be considered bookshelf quality..
im happy with its performance..
actually it doesnt lack bass, just turn the volume to around 80%, you definately feel the bass.. it came with a 5.5 inch mid, thus enable it to play pretty decent bass note.. if you compared it to Aego, its more relaxing to listen to for long hours becos it wasnt as pointy as Aego..

Im happy with my set...

My vote goes to M3300. It's a good speaker for music superb clarity and tight bass. Performance with movies is also good but if you're a bass head or gamer, then go for others. Of all the budget models you listed, M3300 wins hands down ... at least for me

can anyone give me the pricing for
R501 MKII
and
S5.1

tq very much

R501 retail at RM399

S5.1 already stop carrying

input stage of most (if not all) edifier speakers internal power amp is not that good, u can improve the sound quality by adding a pre-amp stage between ur source and speaker

not sure 4 u find it lacking of bass but the set i;m uisng the bass is too overwhelming for songs usually turn it till lowest when movie-ing its not bad either mayb an additional sub is needed but it sound ok to me since the room shakes when the bass is at its highest
wat sound card r u pairing it with?

Quote from the V2 Forum:

Edifier get the ISO14001 (Environmental Management System Cert)

All Edifier speaker ROHS ready.

This certification is great news. It is nice to see Edifier in the leading forefront of our environment for our planet.

just got M3300...

i hate telling the truth but M3300 really gave me a big disappointment. As most of u here recommended me go for M3300 due to its clarity and tight bass. U r right about the clarity but i couldnt see there's tight bass ...all it could perform was a weak and inappropriate low frequency to its good treble . I tried maximizing the bass boosting as much as i could and the result got worse and worse
------------------
i think that M3300 is just mediocre in performance. There's certainly a gap between M3300 and ATP3 (the same situation there when i compare it to VS 4121 ). Maybe its clarity gets the point but it totally lose the rest !
-------------------
Thx for all of ur advices. This thread is EDIFIER's FAN CLUB, So definitely some guys assess EDIFIER's products partially.They r give more peformance than EDIFIER can offer customers.
We need more true evalution or feedback than exaggeration

You should have tested the speakers first before you bought them.
I believe that there is no absolutes for determining a speaker's quality.
Some listeners might think it is lousy but some might think it is excellent.
The fan club here is mainly to serve as secondary references to help in your purchase decisions.
The primary reference should always be the speakers that you want to buy and your own ears.

You shall have tested it out before making any commitment. I still remember a year ago when I want to get myself a set of M3300 but ended up buying S2.1D, M3300 doesn't sound good enough to my ears.

Agree with kelvinyam. I plan to get a M3300 after hearing so much recommendation for it. But i ended up with M3400 because i like it's bass than the M3300. TRY before you buy..

Really sorry that you did not get what you expected but you should have really tested it out before making your decision. You asked for an opinion and we gave you our opinion. Opinions and assessments about audio are always subjective and leans to personal taste and budget. Anyway I did tell you to go for other options if you're a bass lover. Good luck in your quest for better sound.

Hi....I'm waiting for S2.1MKII...does edifier have the official date when it will release the S2.1MKII? Plz get some news...i'm so excited to bring it back!!! KEKEKE

Have you auditioned it? How is it compare to S2.1D?

The S2.1MKII will definitely better than the S2.1D because 5 years ago Edifier still don't have the ability to built this kind of system.

Other than the spec that I couldn't digest, what made it so superior until could challenge AegoM?

Is the design final for S2.1MKII ? Will the satellites have piano finishing ?
Hopefully the price can be competitive .... I hope it will be somewhere in the GMX 2.1 price bracket. Else its pretty obvious which is the obvious choice at the same price ... S2.1MKII or AegoM

The new S series will be voice by Phil Jones.

The design is not final yet. Some touch up on the outlook and the satellite will have the piano finish. The price of S2.1MKII will be higher than GMX 2.1 and itha ve the digital output and higher power (around 300W).

For GMX range, u can try the S2.1M which is 6.5" woofer (power rate: 80W) and the price should be higher than the current S2.1 and below the GMX 2.1. The sound quality definitely will better than the old S2.1D. U can try the prototype in our showroom.

Beside that, we will have another version call S2.1, which have 8" woofer driver. Hopefully the price is at GMX2.1 bracket.

This year looks to be quite an exciting year for Edifier. One comment though ... you guys really need to do something about the naming of the new models ... so many variations of S2.1

Edifier should come up with a single subwoofer design..
Can use it to pair with S2000...

Don't worry man, they will change the product code after the products is ready for market.

This post has been edited by Edifier: Jan 5 2007, 01:02 PM

i m looking for speaker mainly for music... < 500 budget... anyone can help me here ? >"<

ohh yeah i m using philips aurilium ext soundcard...

This post has been edited by Kuso: Jan 5 2007, 02:06 PM

For music

2.0 - try the R1900T3
2.1 - try the M3300 or coming models like S2.1M & S2.1

I have tested it!!! I give 10/10.... Edifier! Would u inform us when Phil have final products for S2.1MKII, OK?

well, in fact what is the definition of tight bass? perhaps the tight of ur meaning is different with other's definition.
by the budget price, i really won't think you can get a superb setup with wide sound stage, transparent sound, well define treble, sweet vocal, and tight bass all in one. else why we bother to spend couple thousand to buy an ENTRY level of hifi speaker? even AEGO M were f**ked up by people claiming it's emphasized on vocal, treble, lack in bass, yada yada...
IMHO within price range of RM 1000, all we can do is to find a speaker sound that suit our own taste, we can't get an nice all rounder with that price, as it is mainly design to use as multimedia speaker / computer speaker which end up playing majority MP3 or loosely format.

i had two MP220, with price of it RM 99, i can buy an creative 2.1 speaker already. but heck i know there will be some sacrificed. i want vocal, it gave me vocal, that's good enough for the price, i won't blame it for unable to produce bass. just same theory, buying somethings within a budget price, we should be prepare for some "flaws" that had with it. and what you should really do is to test it out, to see u can detect the flaws, or u can tolerance it or not.

This post has been edited by PcWork: Jan 6 2007, 11:58 AM

exactly true man, u r genius! i am strongly agree with ur point there. u really point out the truth.

for me, tight bass definition is good dumping effect response bass. M3300, S2.1, Aego they all are tight bass speaker. loose bass speaker is like sonic gear bluethunder series , VS4121. wanna know a bass is tight or not, go study dumping effect then u know wat actually 'tight' means.

This post has been edited by Genius2006: Jan 6 2007, 12:53 PM

Maybe we should stop using these audiophile jargons like "tight bass" when giving recommendations and stick to layman's term

xterminator: Tell us more about your test. Give a review if possible. Many of us are to far away to visit the showroom.

i had chance to compare the difference between M3300 and VS4121 side by side. For the Vs4121 i found that the mid's really bad and the bass is powerful and not good...somehow it may produce so much bass but in form of "u..u.u.." <- Did u mean that "not tight" ?

if330 with iPod




Attached thumbnail(s)


Attached image(s)

from the imformation u trying to carry out, i think that was call boomy bass, not loose bass. boomy bass is worse than loose bass. boomy bass is loose, but loose bass not must be boomy. for example, M3300 bass is considering tight, but have u try turn the bass to the maximum point? u will hear the "wu..wu..wu.." sound also, that is exaggeration in bass causing the bass bommy. lets talk back the VS4121, the bass natively is loose. even though u turn the bass to just a quarter position, u will find that the bass reponse is longer time and softer and not hard hitting, that is the loose bass. nobody want a loose bass, loose bass is inaccurate bass, no matter how loud it can produce. loose bass is bad control or lost control from the amp to driving the subwoofer

This post has been edited by Genius2006: Jan 8 2007, 08:48 PM

jst bought M3300. tested it and like it. but i've only compared with sonic gear armageddon and edifier M3400. among these, M3300 is the best.

though some say aego is better, but i havent got a chance to test it out yet. M3300 so far so good.

So you got the right choice edi?

+1
that's what i intended to tell u about VS 4121.

can i ask the price of

s2000
e3100
m3400

nid some opinion coz im getting new 2.1 speakers,for music and movies

s2000=Rm1499
e3100=RM179
m3400=not sure...

s2000=Rm1499


i think i going to get e3100

i felt fed up wit my fren when he saying dat my newly bought Edifier M3300 is lousy if compare to Altec,i was very angry wit wat he said,as i noe,Edifier speaker has the bast bass among all brand,even is 2.1,3.1 n so on,do ur all agree?

haha...never mind la..juz let it be...coz different ear got different tastes...as long as u love it...dude

This post has been edited by kko217: Jan 11 2007, 09:09 PM

Hahaha ... well it depends who you are talking to. For some people, boomy bass is better. Anyway what's more important is how you feel about your own speaker. If you're happy with it then it wouldn't matter what your friend say

haha!
dont care what they say la...maybe your ear-drum langsung diffrent from them lehh...
as i will support you that Edifier is good!

I went and see the s2.1d mkII and found out the subwoofer is huge guys...size similar to a home theater sub...

like the sats very much...i think it would look nice without the intended piano finish

U shud bring your friend to Edifier showroom to try the S2.1MKII

When u turn the volume until 40 or above, your whole body and head would feel the bass like vibrate you....The bass was so boomy n powerful too!!! This Baby is mine when this was on sale...

Who said that? Wei Lik got said a not?

My dat fren keep saying dat bcoz of my budget so i go for Edifier,he even say dat Edifier is a lousy brand,he say even Logitech also can beat Edifier,come on,if my budget is 1k above,i will still choose Edifier,the bass is boom boom enough,i ask him to go sri computers n compare it but he said dat he bought his speaker set at Low Yat too,i wonder wat set he bought dat he tinks dat Edifier is a lousy brand n duno is which stupid ppl dat convince him dat Edifier is a lousy brand,is reli iritating u noe?!

NO la joshua,i listen it by myself n tink so

This post has been edited by Wuakaka: Jan 12 2007, 08:35 PM

come on.. dun because to get a speaker, but lose a fren.

In fact, i seriously doubt ur fren r layman in audiophile. there is no way a logitech speaker can better than edifier! even though u take their highest 2.1 Z2300(RM550) versus the cheap M3300(RM230) i still say M3300 is way better in over all sound stage. same goes to altec lansing speaker. IMHO, altec lansing just produce good speaker start from RM450(CS21) and above. their lower range product like ATP3 and vs4121 sounds like a speaker cover by a pillow, and the bass is loud but bloat and not well defined. for those layman who dunno acoustic, they usually thought bass louder meaning the speaker is better. this kind of user like ur fren better ask them go to buy car speaker, because those cheap car skeaper already can blast until ur house vibrate with their "boomy" bass.

but... ignorance is not their fault, because they dun have a sensitive ear. just dun waste ur time to argue with them because they wouldn't understand it.

Well that's not much we can say any more but thanks to ur support on our product and the most important things is that u feel that u'd make a right choice,welcome to the club.

no point argue. in ur eye, ppl said altec is better is wrong. but at their eye, u said edifier is better is exactly same as what u feel right now.
what for to argue, u spend ur money, u are happy, u don't have to convince him to believe that edifier is super duper good.
but in my opinion, every brand has their own respective model.
if you are going to say altec better than edifier, have to depend on what model. the same theory goes the other way. no offend, edifier also has sucks speaker. but they have some nice one that serve me well.for example MP220. but not R501 MKII / E series. they are just not my cup of tea. why i choose a portable speaker instead? because i like how it sound, and i am happy with it's price. that's enough. i don't need whole world to agree with me for me to enjoy my music. i appriciate mp220 compared to creative travelsound so well until i go out and get another pair to keep. so as altec, logitech and klipsch. i myself hates klipsch GMX very much and found out the price is seriously a joke. for my ear i can't appriciate it's sound.
and IMHO u shouldn't be saying which one is the BEST among all of them, just as the speaker suit ur need, and it serve u right. that's enough. and RM 500 speaker in a speaker industry is really NOTHING. you get what you paid for, and the most important is, u enjoy ur self. or else you will never be happy with what u have now.

actually people has different taste for different sound, and people has their freedom to love different type of music. and it's not about who is layman or not. if we are talking this way. people with better speaker like S2000 can call all edifier user which less than RM 500 is also layman? and people with half million systems might as well call us "deaf" man which can live with such cheap and lausy speaker that cost "ONLY" RM 800.. lol
altec has good speaker last time. but since their main designer pass away. they pass on the design to china. and make it sucks. but they do have some model that worth to try too. so personal taste take in place.

This post has been edited by PcWork: Jan 12 2007, 10:19 PM

so dat means if i my budget reli is above Rm 500,i should go for altec?
u juz mention it dat if compare lower range oni lose,so if i wan compare the higher range de leh?

i can't tell u which is better.
i heard S2000V, it is too flat for me, too boring for my ear.
so far, sub RM 1K systems i only happy with Aego M / Altec MX5021/ R1900TIII.
and serious speaking FX6021 is SUCkS also.
its depend on ur budget, what kind music u like, and mainly use the speaker for wat (movie/ music).
then u only can find a speaker suit ur taste. else i suggest you get an Aego T set which can easily cost u couple thousand. that's quite good in my ear and my budget.

oh ya,i oso heard b4 of MX5021,is reli is a good speaker,actually,i buy tis set of speaker is juz for personal use oni la,coz my house already got Bmb karaoke system,n Jbl home theathre system,so is not reli is a must to buy a god pc speaker la,btw,thx,nice to meet u

Why make a big deal in convincing people which is better. Think of speakers as ice cream. Some people like chocolate and others like strawberry. It depends on personal taste. Take Aego M speakers, although it is generally agreed that it is a good set, some still find the brightness too much. It boils down to personal taste. However one thing I think everyone would agree is that Edifier gives a better performance/price ratio.

if wanna take 2.1 vs 2.1, currently the highest range product from edifier is S2.1D(arround RM390) only. IMO MX5021 is still better than S2.1D. anyway, there is a term we always use "performance/price ratio", S2.1D still perform very good for the price u pay RM390 only. but i never say RM500 and above altec lansing is best choice, what i mean is just RM500 above speaker like MX5021 at least have the quality there so u can consider it. FYI, the lastest and highest range 2.1 from edifier is S2.1MKII. its going to release in the market in this year. u can go to test it at show room now. i really think RM500 above 2.1 speaker, S2.1MKII still beat all the other 2.1 speaker like logitech, altec lansing, creative, and klipsch. so... no matter wat range i still think edifier is the winner, i can see they keep work hard to improve their speaker quality, their product building material never reduce one. last time 4 to 5 years ago i am altec lansing fans. at that time their speaker quality really good. but after that i dunno wat happen to altec lansing, their quality really drop already, meanwhile edifier keep improve their speaker quality, so now i change to edifier fan already because i found that their product for low, high range all also very good quality. u wanna take 4 years b4 ATP3 compare with current ATP3? u will found
that altec lansing they reduce their building material to save cost! one more thing i can tell u is, i always think ATP3 and VS4121 sounds like cover by a pillow u know y?
because this speaker design natively got problem! did u know their 3" satelite is hide under the satelite? this is the reason make the satelite sounds blur. wat the heck to the design engineer of altec lansing, i start disappointed to them since ATP3 and their following product. i am not convince anybody here because i believe u have ur own idea. if u urself dun like that kind of sounding method, no matter how i convince u also no point. u can always test by urself 1st b4 decide to buy. i just want to release my opinion here.

This post has been edited by DotA 5.84C -AR: Jan 13 2007, 10:20 AM

I got S2000 for RM999 during PCFAIR promo. I think its worth every penny. It sounded very good, and can be played loud without distortion. My bro Aego M sounds good too but doesnt play loud very well. Thats has something to do with the sub being too weak. When you play at normal volume, it blends in very well. But once you go loud, the sub is overpowered by the sattelite. Meanwhile, S2000 slightly lack bass when you play at low-to-moderate. But as you turn up the volume, the bass become more apparent and solid.

As for MX5021, its worth every penny too. Using it b4 upgraded to S2000. The bass is good and the sattelites sound decent enough for a 2.5inches drivers. The weak point of it lies with the sattelites as do many other MM speaker which utilises less than 3inches drivers. Some male singers vocals sounded so thin that it sounded very feminine. Normal cone speaker like Aego or CS21 sounded a lot better than MX5021 when you play western rock song where the male vocal tends to be bassy.

juz look back n u will find out dat is because their main designer had passed away and now the designing part is all in china now,so no wonder the quality is getting worser and worser

Yes, the designer pass away after he design the ACS48. All the new products now is produce by the factory in China and AL just bought over by the Plantronic.

^

So, will that mean that there won't be anymore Altec Lansing Speakers?

Any of you got any comment on the Edifier C2? Some random salesman at one of the shop in LY recommend it cos it got the best "sound quality" for 2.1 speaker. I must admit it looks sexy cos it comes with its own amp ... but other than that, my hi-fi-stunted ears can't really tell the diff between other speakers D:

Edifier product line in CES2007




Attached thumbnail(s)

How long does Edifier to produce new products for multimedia speakers?

my e3100 still rockin after 3 years! yay!

New S 2.1M, will be available soon. U can try it @ Edifier showroom now.

This post has been edited by Edifier: Jan 17 2007, 04:35 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

Hmm ... looks like the C2 to me

Tested so far and IMHO,the bass is better than S2.1d.

For the high end series all the sub will use the same design (boxy) and the satellite is piano finish.

The Sound quality of the S2.1M definitely will better than the S2.1D because

1. it use the newly design driver
2. New Amplifier design
3. Voice by Phil Jones

The bass will be more tight and powerful than the old S2.1D and the satellite will sound more clear than old S2.1D due to using the newly design driver.

Please drop by to test it @ Edifier showroom if u r in Low Yat Plaza.

Do you have the market price for s2.1M ?

how does the s2.1m fair wif the up coming model s2.1mkII wif is in demo at the edifier showroom

May I know what is 'voice by Phil Jones'? I saw one or two models having that in the retail pricelist.

Phil Jones is a human.

Me using audigy Zs. When listnen to those ape files, you can hear the sound so clear and so vocal. But mp3 is so so. Another problem i need to turn on the know untill 50% only can get the sound from the speaker. It seem lack of puch in the input stage. My soundcard i set it to 40%.
I find these speaker very choosy, good sound when only input good quality songs. MP3 just very bad, maybe my own problem.

MP3 not that bad lar.. I prefer mp3 cos APE filesize is terrible..

Just wondering, what's the difference between S2000 and S2000v? Thanks

Guys, I'm getting a 2.1 speaker. Just wondering should I get M3300, M3310 or M3400? Or any other set that you want to recommend me? Budget around RM200 or so.

This post has been edited by jdreamer: Jan 18 2007, 10:07 AM

S2000 is the one with stand alone Amp, the sats are pure speaker lo,
Spec for both is similar, S2000V powered speaker..

You might try M3300, if you getting for not only PC, but TV set, you can try M3310 (Remote Controller)

Erm, so does it means that S2000 is the same as S2000V, except that the S2000 comes with a standalone amp and also a remote control?

I've heard M3300 is good at its clarity. I'm into music a lot and thats actually the reason that I'm getting a set. I don't know which to choose from.

Anyone in here using S2000?
Wanted to know which sound card do you all pair with?
I've auditioned before S2000 and Prodigy 7.1LT combo.
I don't know how to explain, i can feel the sound isn't fully coming out.

Correct

This post has been edited by lAh0S: Jan 18 2007, 11:47 AM

Slightly higher than S2.1D - RM400++. The spec is similar to S2.1D - 80w RMS.

Thanks for the reply

Btw, does it works well without the amp that is bundled together? Does it sound as good as the bundled amp if I add in an aftermarket amp? Need to know it cause S2000 is extra RM500 more than S2000V. Thanks.

can the r1900tIII be used ofr home theatre speakers?

LOL

2000V cant compared to S2000 lar. It sounded more like a bookshelf than normal multimedia speaker. Some may prefer the aggresive sound of multimedia speaker but S2000 sounded a bit more smoother, and somewhat laid back due to its bigger drivers used. I like it due to its fuller sound although it wont produce the kind of bass you will get with a full blown sub like MX5021 or Klipsch/Logitech. Ppl who like boom boom boom wont appreciate it.

Just haf to turn the volume pass 50% and then listen to it... nice.... it still play decent bass note but doesnt exeggerate. Goto Edifier showroom to try. The clarity is good.

This post has been edited by kapitan: Jan 19 2007, 12:03 PM

But S2000v should have very close sound characteristic with S2000.....They r in same series.. nop?

S2000v and S2000 sharing the same speakers.
Just the S2000 is come with the amp only.
He's not trying to compare the sound of S2000v and S2000;
He's trying to compare S2000v's speakers and S2000's speaker.
I sure they are the same.
Correct me if i'm wrong.

This post has been edited by lAh0S: Jan 19 2007, 07:14 PM