Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 medical / critical illness insurance enquiry

views
     
TSxuzen
post Feb 19 2009, 11:50 AM, updated 17y ago

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Hello teachers,

I am in the market to look for a critical illness insurance plan. To be precise... basic plan, not those tied up with investment link etc.

Can you please advise?

Thank you.

Xuzen.
bbjslee
post Feb 19 2009, 12:26 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 19 2009, 11:50 AM)
Hello teachers,

I am in the market to look for a critical illness insurance plan. To be precise... basic plan,  not those tied up with investment link etc.

Can you please advise?

Thank you.

Xuzen.
*
What's your income?
What's your budget for Insurance?
How old?
Female/Male?
Occupation?
Do you have any dependent? How many? How old? Are they working or not?

If you feel uncomfortable to provide the details above here, might as well set up appointment with all the agents from diff. insurance company.
TSxuzen
post Feb 19 2009, 01:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(bbjslee @ Feb 19 2009, 12:26 PM)
What's your income?
What's your budget for Insurance?
How old?
Female/Male?
Occupation?
Do you have any dependent? How many? How old? Are they working or not?

If you feel uncomfortable to provide the details above here, might as well set up appointment with all the agents from diff. insurance company.
*
What's your income?
What's your budget for Insurance? RM 150 - 175K coverage
How old? (mid 30's and non-smoker)
Female/Male? (Male)
Occupation? (Office worker)
Do you have any dependent? How many? How old? Are they working or not? (One child 2 y/o, one more coming soon)


Xuzen
Colaboy
post Feb 19 2009, 02:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


Get a few quote around . . . & talk to few agents before making up ur mind
Anyway you could have a look at Prudential MultipleCrisis Cover
Good Product !
bbjslee
post Feb 19 2009, 02:40 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 19 2009, 01:28 PM)
What's your income?
What's your budget for Insurance? RM 150 - 175K coverage
How old? (mid 30's and non-smoker)
Female/Male? (Male)
Occupation? (Office worker)
Do you have any dependent? How many? How old? Are they working or not? (One child 2 y/o, one more coming soon)
Xuzen
*
Thanks for the info.
Actually budget for Insurance means how much you willing to pay for Insurance monthly/yearly?
frankliew
post Feb 19 2009, 02:56 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
662 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: KL



Are u a insurance agent? bbjslee
bbjslee
post Feb 19 2009, 03:05 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(frankliew @ Feb 19 2009, 02:56 PM)
Are u a insurance agent? bbjslee
*
Yes. I am. From Great Eastern.
InvestBursa
post Feb 19 2009, 09:58 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
I believe that you understand the difference between medical and critical illness otherwise please do some research.

You may look at it from few angles.
1. Affordable budget for premium, e.g. RM200 per month
2. Medical Coverage .e.g RM150 life limit , RM50 per yearly limit
3. Critical Illness coverage , normall is 36 illness .e.g RM100K

Ask agent to work out some quotation for you.
It is advisable to include Term Life Insurance.

mtsen
post Feb 19 2009, 11:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


the most cost effective option is in below link, scroll down further you can increase coverage on h&s and critical illness.

http://safepay.com.my/ins101.asp

cuebiz
post Feb 20 2009, 12:06 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
992 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Bolehland


TS

Besides budget, you should find out what type of disease are covered in the Critical illness policy. Do not assume it is the same for all insurance company.

Same goes for medical card. I do know one insurance company does not 100% cover eye cataract surgery.
mtsen
post Feb 20 2009, 12:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(cuebiz @ Feb 20 2009, 12:06 AM)
TS

Besides budget, you should find out what type of disease are covered in the Critical illness policy. Do not assume it is the same for all insurance company.

Same goes for medical card. I do know one insurance company does not 100% cover eye cataract surgery.
*
as a matter of fact, all 36 critical illness are the same by regulation, its the claim process one should worry about.

however, advice on medical is very true.

the best way to cater for above issues is to understand the claim process yourself. that way you eleminate the factor that your claim depends on how good your agent is.

hope this helps !
TSxuzen
post Feb 20 2009, 12:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


I got a quite of RM 536.00 p.a. for SA 50K (AIA)

I asked for a basic (no rider and not investment linked) critical illness coverage and this is what the agent quoted me.

Is this a fair market rate?

Xuzen

hamster9
post Feb 20 2009, 10:39 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 20 2009, 12:44 PM)
I got a quite of RM 536.00 p.a. for SA 50K (AIA)

I asked for a basic (no rider and not investment linked) critical illness coverage and this is what the agent quoted me.

Is this a fair market rate?

Xuzen
*
looks reasonable for a yearly payment. i believe it's a term insurance. Ask your agent regarding Inflation Protection Plan if u wanna view on more products but it's slightly expensive and as mentioned no rider and not investment linked.
raylimfs
post Feb 21 2009, 06:00 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


xuzen... mind if I'm asking...why you need only CI policy?.. you knew you going to get one?.. or you already have?.. sorry for asking this... and about SUMINSURED=50K from AIA for RM536 it's mean about RM1.46 per day... does this fill your needs if you are really lucky having this 36odds sickness? I mean weird...I dun mean to sabotage any of the agent here, seems that everyone just asking how much you can pay?.. I mean yeah I understand they need to know your ability. But all you need to focus here is your need? You need this money for medical treatment? Or you need this money for your party when you not around? I'm sorry if I say anything that's making you angry, but this is insurance and this is the fact! Focus on your needs.....All the best...
YuNGSeNG
post Feb 21 2009, 12:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,382 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(hamster9 @ Feb 20 2009, 10:39 PM)
looks reasonable for a yearly payment. i believe it's a term insurance. Ask your agent regarding Inflation Protection Plan if u wanna view on more products but it's slightly expensive and as mentioned no rider and not investment linked.
*
Inflation Protection Plan is too expensive for him since it is an endowment plan. I think wholelife non-par is better for him if he looking for life insurance + critical illness + medical card.

If he don't want life insurance, and only want critical illness + medical card protection. Then buy separate of each.


TSxuzen
post Feb 21 2009, 12:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(raylimfs @ Feb 21 2009, 06:00 AM)
xuzen... mind if I'm asking...why you need only CI policy?.. you knew you going to get one?.. or you already have?.. sorry for asking this...  and about  SUMINSURED=50K from AIA for RM536 it's mean about RM1.46 per day... does this fill your needs if you are really lucky having this 36odds sickness? I mean weird...I dun mean to sabotage any of the agent here, seems that everyone just asking how much you can pay?.. I mean yeah I understand they need to know your ability. But all you need to focus here is your need? You need this money for medical treatment? Or you need this money for your party when you not around? I'm sorry if I say anything that's making you angry, but this is insurance and this is the fact! Focus on your needs.....All the best...
*
I need CI for protection.

I read from KC Lau, Money Matter that we need CI protection of 3 x our annual income. Therefore I am under protected (my existing CI policy which was bought earlier based on my earlier income level and is currently inadequate). Adding this RM 50K will bring it up to an adequate level.

I am healthy at the moment, but getting sick during older age is a guarantee.

And since we are on this topic, what would be considered a adequate protection for Hospitalization & Medical?

Xuzen


Added on February 21, 2009, 12:17 pm
QUOTE(YuNGSeNG @ Feb 21 2009, 12:12 PM)
Inflation Protection Plan is too expensive for him since it is an endowment plan. I think wholelife non-par is better for him if he looking for life insurance + critical illness + medical card.

If he don't want life insurance, and only want critical illness + medical card protection. Then buy separate of each.
*
My Life Policy is adequate.

I am now looking to up my CI and Med card Protection. As one progress in life, ones' needs and protection increases. Yes, I want to keep my CI & Med card policy separate, it is cheaper this way isn't it?

Xuzen

This post has been edited by xuzen: Feb 21 2009, 12:17 PM
bbjslee
post Feb 21 2009, 12:56 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 21 2009, 12:15 PM)
I need CI for protection.

I read from KC Lau, Money Matter that we need CI protection of 3 x our annual income. Therefore I am under protected (my existing CI policy which was bought earlier based on my earlier income level and is currently inadequate). Adding this RM 50K will bring it up to an adequate level.

I am healthy at the moment, but getting sick during older age is a guarantee.

And since we are on this topic, what would be considered a adequate protection for Hospitalization & Medical?

Xuzen


Added on February 21, 2009, 12:17 pm
My Life Policy is adequate.

I am now looking to up my CI and Med card Protection. As one progress in life, ones' needs and protection increases. Yes, I want to keep my CI & Med card policy separate, it is cheaper this way isn't it?

Xuzen
*
So currently you already have Life insurance. Does your current life insurance cover 3D?
- Death
- Total Permanent Disability
- Dreaded Disease (CI)
If yes. Why not you just top up your current one instead of getting a new policy.
If not, though you may not like it, might as well get an investment link insurance. A RM1800/yr ILP, can cover RM250k (3D).
Don't think of investment link insurance as all evil, it is actually very useful for low budget ppl.
An ILP which cover 40+ yrs is actually cheaper than term insurance that covers over the same length of time.

How much CI to cover is up to you to decide (depending on your budget too).
1. 3x annual Income, this is the easiest and minimum.
2. Potential earning from now till retirement. Example: Your annual income now is RM36k, and you're able to work for another 20 yrs. so RM36kx20. That is what you should get.
3. Requirement of dependent. Assuming your wife is able to look after herself financially, how bout your children? Let say you have 2 children. Try calculate their financial requirement from now till graduate from public university (at least that should be the minimum). So that should be your yardstick of how much coverage you need.

As for hospitalization (medical card), it is up to individual and budget.
Do you want to stay in a RM150/night room? or RM300/night room?
Things to look for in a medical card
- Renewable?
- Annual limit / Lifetime limit?
- Co-insurance? (Maximum & minimum)

This post has been edited by bbjslee: Feb 21 2009, 02:02 PM
YuNGSeNG
post Feb 21 2009, 03:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,382 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 21 2009, 12:15 PM)
I need CI for protection.

I read from KC Lau, Money Matter that we need CI protection of 3 x our annual income. Therefore I am under protected (my existing CI policy which was bought earlier based on my earlier income level and is currently inadequate). Adding this RM 50K will bring it up to an adequate level.

I am healthy at the moment, but getting sick during older age is a guarantee.

And since we are on this topic, what would be considered a adequate protection for Hospitalization & Medical?

Xuzen


Added on February 21, 2009, 12:17 pm
My Life Policy is adequate.

I am now looking to up my CI and Med card Protection. As one progress in life, ones' needs and protection increases. Yes, I want to keep my CI & Med card policy separate, it is cheaper this way isn't it?
Xuzen
*
CI & Med card policy separate, it is cheaper this way isn't it?
It will be the same, wouldn't cheapter.
Just to know ur budget of CI + Medical card is ? Budget here means annual premium
twentyfour24
post Feb 21 2009, 05:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
162 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
the 1st coverage u need to have is medical plan.
just attached medical card n critical illness plan will do.
some of the insurance company on critical illness already include for savings,term,PA plan as well.so u no need to pay extra.
normal_user
post Feb 21 2009, 07:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Shah Alam


Its difficult to separate CI & Med Card if you already subscribed long time ago, unless if you buy 2nd policy that focuses on CI only and reduce the CI benefit for the 1st policy.

I know this one investment & protection plan that gives u RM200K CI protection for around RM100-150 per month (according to age). Or u can configure it for RM100K CI & RM100K Death. Policy runs until age 100 years old. If for non-investment/savings plan, the premium would be much much cheaper. PM me if u want to know more.

This post has been edited by normal_user: Feb 21 2009, 07:19 PM
mtsen
post Feb 22 2009, 02:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 21 2009, 12:15 PM)
I need CI for protection.

I read from KC Lau, Money Matter that we need CI protection of 3 x our annual income. Therefore I am under protected (my existing CI policy which was bought earlier based on my earlier income level and is currently inadequate). Adding this RM 50K will bring it up to an adequate level.

I am healthy at the moment, but getting sick during older age is a guarantee.

And since we are on this topic, what would be considered a adequate protection for Hospitalization & Medical?

Xuzen


Added on February 21, 2009, 12:17 pm
My Life Policy is adequate.

I am now looking to up my CI and Med card Protection. As one progress in life, ones' needs and protection increases. Yes, I want to keep my CI & Med card policy separate, it is cheaper this way isn't it?

Xuzen
*
why not try asking your employer to top up that 50k for you for free ? smile.gif



nixon
post Feb 22 2009, 09:25 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
this is the best insurance i will serve u...

zaza ade byk plan untuK yang berminat dgn great eastern insurance...yang ramai client ambil dgn saya

1) GE- AC DANA RESTU WITH MEDICAL CARD ( RM150 ATAU RM200 P/MONTH) ISLAMIC PLAN

2) GE- AC PENDIDIKAN DANA RESTU WITH MEDICAL CARD (RM110 P/MONTH) ISLAMIC PLAN


3) TGH PANAS SKANG NEH---CONTENNIAL WONDER...BUKAK 2 BULAN JE...LAST MAC....BERMINAT BAGITAU MIN IS 20K..7% PER YEAR UNTUNG....

4) KALAU SESAPE YANG POLIS ATAU ASKAR BOLEH BUAT INSURAN KELOMPOK BAYAR 30 SEBULAN UNTUK MEDICAL CARD..TAPI BURN..KALAU ADER ASKAR/ POLIS DALAM NE..CALL ME K...RUGI KALAU U ALL TAKDER MENDE NI...

5) KALAU ADER NAK INSURANSKAN COMPANY DIA PUN BOLEH...COVERED 1 JUTA...NE RAMAI TOKEI AMBIL..

I ADER MSG SESETENGAH USER BUKA DANA TAQWA ..DANA RESTU..MAAF YE...

I WILL HELP U..IN ANY ASKING..DONT HESITATE K....013-3973020
TSxuzen
post Feb 23 2009, 01:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(mtsen @ Feb 22 2009, 02:36 AM)
why not try asking your employer to top up that 50k for you for free ? smile.gif
*
I am self employed.

Xuzen


chew_ronnie
post Feb 23 2009, 06:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 19 2009, 01:28 PM)
What's your income?
What's your budget for Insurance? RM 150 - 175K coverage
How old? (mid 30's and non-smoker)
Female/Male? (Male)
Occupation? (Office worker)
Do you have any dependent? How many? How old? Are they working or not? (One child 2 y/o, one more coming soon)
Xuzen
*
Dear Xuzen,

I have a quote for you. Based on age 30 male non-smoker.

Investment Linked Policy - The cheapest given your budget.
Death Benefit - RM 100K
Total Permanent Disability - RM 100K
36 Critical Illness - RM 200K
important note: If diagnose with 36 Critical Illness, this account will pay RM 200K. Then later if Death occurs, the account will pay another RM 100K. So its RM 300K in total.

The premium, RM 150/mth - RM 1800/yr. This is no scam.

Call or contact me at 016 335 0044.
vergas
post Feb 23 2009, 09:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,488 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Feb 23 2009, 06:13 PM)
Dear Xuzen,

I have a quote for you. Based on age 30 male non-smoker.

Investment Linked Policy - The cheapest given your budget.
Death Benefit - RM 100K
Total Permanent Disability - RM 100K
36 Critical Illness - RM 200K
important note: If diagnose with 36 Critical Illness, this account will pay RM 200K. Then later if Death occurs, the account will pay another RM 100K. So its RM 300K in total.

The premium, RM 150/mth - RM 1800/yr. This is no scam.

Call or contact me at 016 335 0044.
*
I believe he is looking for a stand alone plan.

QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 19 2009, 11:50 AM)
Hello teachers,

I am in the market to look for a critical illness insurance plan. To be precise... basic plan,  not those tied up with investment link etc.
The problems is most people will quote many extra. But can't really blame them for just trying to earn a living...

QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 20 2009, 12:44 PM)
I got a quite of RM 536.00 p.a. for SA 50K (AIA)

I asked for a basic (no rider and not investment linked) critical illness coverage and this is what the agent quoted me.

Is this a fair market rate?

Xuzen
*
In 2004 I took AIA healthguard 55 for RM790 per annum, RM100,000 coverage, I was 30 then. Hope this helps your comparison.

This post has been edited by vergas: Feb 23 2009, 09:45 PM
cuebiz
post Feb 23 2009, 09:55 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
992 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Bolehland


TS

Rm500++ for a 50K CI is quite affordable. I suggest that you should also evaluate the agent that is going to serve you. There is already a few thread complaining about poor agents.
NINJIAO
post Feb 25 2009, 11:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(cuebiz @ Feb 23 2009, 09:55 PM)
TS

Rm500++ for a 50K CI is quite affordable. I suggest that you should also evaluate the agent that is going to serve you. There is already a few thread complaining about poor agents.
*
Hmm but RM50K. After hospitalization, won't left much for you to recover.
mtsen
post Feb 26 2009, 09:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


ts already said its a top up
Colaboy
post Feb 26 2009, 11:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


QUOTE(NINJIAO @ Feb 25 2009, 11:49 PM)
Hmm but RM50K. After hospitalization, won't left much for you to recover.
*
true also la
Crictical Illness according rules of thumb
one shall have at least 4 years their annual income
which means if you are earning 30K per annum - you will need RM120,000 CI

Gen-X
post Feb 28 2009, 11:49 PM

Lifetime LYN Member
Group Icon
Elite
8,601 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL

QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 21 2009, 12:15 PM)
QUOTE(raylimfs @ Feb 21 2009, 06:00 AM)

xuzen... mind if I'm asking...why you need only CI policy?.. you knew you going to get one?.. or you already have?.. sorry for asking this...  and about  SUMINSURED=50K from AIA for RM536 it's mean about RM1.46 per day... does this fill your needs if you are really lucky having this 36odds sickness? I mean weird...I dun mean to sabotage any of the agent here, seems that everyone just asking how much you can pay?.. I mean yeah I understand they need to know your ability. But all you need to focus here is your need? You need this money for medical treatment? Or you need this money for your party when you not around? I'm sorry if I say anything that's making you angry, but this is insurance and this is the fact! Focus on your needs.....All the best...
*
I need CI for protection.

I read from KC Lau, Money Matter that we need CI protection of 3 x our annual income. Therefore I am under protected (my existing CI policy which was bought earlier based on my earlier income level and is currently inadequate). Adding this RM 50K will bring it up to an adequate level.

I am healthy at the moment, but getting sick during older age is a guarantee.

And since we are on this topic, what would be considered a adequate protection for Hospitalization & Medical?

Xuzen


Added on February 21, 2009, 12:17 pm
My Life Policy is adequate.

I am now looking to up my CI and Med card Protection. As one progress in life, ones' needs and protection increases. Yes, I want to keep my CI & Med card policy separate, it is cheaper this way isn't it?

Xuzen
*
Xuzen, I agree with what raylimfs said. What the are odds of you getting the 36 CI? Even if you are dignosed with 36 CI, how long you think the RM50K or RM100K going to last you if you need treatment? Go and ask people, 1 time treatment for cancer may cost above RM30K if dignosed early.

What I noted from your reply above is you are looking for Med Card Protection. Assuming that you dont' have a Med Card, my opinion is that better to get one instead of just CI only. My wife's nephew was hit by a car last week and the had to undergo major operation and after discharged requires therapy and it will cost more that RM40K.

I myself have Prudential Med Card annual limit RM75K and Litimetime RM225K since 2003 at RM200/month and last year upgraded it to lifetime amount of RM300,000 and up to age 75 (from 60)) since I getting old and foresee more health problems sad.gif and now paying about RM340.month. So my point is the ealier you are covered the premium is less and check until what age does the insurance covers you.

My eldest is getting his driving license this year and will be going out more often so I just got him a Med Card from Prudential. His plan is slightly different from mine where it does not insured for take home medicine and got co-insured but his annual amount is same as mine RM75K and Lifetime amount is RM750,000 and monthly premium is only RM125! It also includes RM20K for Accident Out Patient Treatment, RM20K Life and CI.

Suggest you talk to a Prudential agent and compare with others, best if the agent have been doing insurance fulltime for years and highly recommended and not some guy you met that will not provide you service in time of need. And if you do consider Prudential, get the higher Lifetime amount as RM750K vs. RM500K and higher hospital room allowance (what you think it will cost 20 years from now for twin bed room at private hospital) as the premium diff is only about RM20-30/monthly.

Some people may tell you to get Personal Accident and just CI insurance only since it is cheaper but what in the event one is hospitalized because of illness/disease/cancer, can he/she afford to pay the hospital bills at private hospital and not burdening family members after using up all his/her life savings? And I am not even talking about being in ICU or having to go dialysis where the cost is just tremendous.

Lastly, is you are paying taxes, Medical Insurance is tax deductable which is different from the EPF & Life Insurance combined deductable.

This post has been edited by Gen-X: Feb 28 2009, 11:57 PM
eimira
post Mar 1 2009, 02:50 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kelana Jaya



spoken from the heart....

rclxms.gif rclxms.gif

thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by eimira: Mar 1 2009, 02:55 AM
Colaboy
post Mar 1 2009, 01:44 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

Thumbs up for brother gen-x . . . even some of the agents i know from Prudential dont speak as good as you ^^

thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by Colaboy: Mar 1 2009, 01:46 PM
suzannetan
post Mar 2 2009, 12:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
230 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


hi there,

this one you mentioned

My eldest is getting his driving license this year and will be going out more often so I just got him a Med Card from Prudential. His plan is slightly different from mine where it does not insured for take home medicine and got co-insured but his annual amount is same as mine RM75K and Lifetime amount is RM750,000 and monthly premium is only RM125! It also includes RM20K for Accident Out Patient Treatment, RM20K Life and CI.

Can I know what plan is this?

Monthly on rm125 ? That's very affordable, interested to get one btw I'm 22 years old, so I guess maybe need to pay more than rm125?
Gen-X
post Mar 2 2009, 02:32 PM

Lifetime LYN Member
Group Icon
Elite
8,601 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL

QUOTE(suzannetan @ Mar 2 2009, 12:47 PM)
hi there,

this one you mentioned

My eldest is getting his driving license this year and will be going out more often so I just got him a Med Card from Prudential. His plan is slightly different from mine where it does not insured for take home medicine and got co-insured but his annual amount is same as mine RM75K and Lifetime amount is RM750,000 and monthly premium is only RM125! It also includes RM20K for Accident Out Patient Treatment, RM20K Life and CI.

Can I know what plan is this?

Monthly on rm125 ? That's very affordable, interested to get one btw I'm 22 years old, so I guess maybe need to pay more than rm125?
*
It is Prudential Investlink Link. Actually there was a cheaper plan for about RM110 or RM115 for Annual Limit RM50K, Lifetime Limit 500K and Room RM100 but went with the RM750K Lifetime limit as the diff in monthly premium is only RM20. Yah i think my son's policy is pretty good considering the Lifetime limit is RM750K.

When I talk to my agent, i will ask them for various options, I can tell you for RM150/monthly and below premium, the agent can come out with no less than 5 options. If the agent only give you one or two option, go see another agent.

This post has been edited by Gen-X: Mar 2 2009, 02:35 PM
suzannetan
post Mar 2 2009, 04:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
230 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Petaling Jaya


Thanks for the reply, so this one should be with Medical Card which covers most of the hospitalization stuffs as usual..

Hmm sounds pretty worth, I understand that ING's medical card+investment link, cost at least RM250 for my age, which is way too pricy for me. This one sounds much better, I don't really bother is there any investment link, just a medical card is good enough for me
Colaboy
post Mar 2 2009, 05:50 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


Previously the minimum to enter a ILP plan for Prudential is RM150/month.

Now the company has open up to RM100 a month to covor the market for those with lower income group. Basically everything is similiar, with less rider or lower sum assured.
lcl832002
post Mar 4 2009, 09:18 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 19 2009, 12:50 PM)
Hello teachers,

I am in the market to look for a critical illness insurance plan. To be precise... basic plan,  not those tied up with investment link etc.

Can you please advise?

Thank you.

Xuzen.
*
Hi, xuzen.

I have a standalone critical illness insurance plan for you. It is called Premier Healthguard 55 from AIA Berhad.

I think it is a good plan because I don't have to pay any more premium from 56 to 70 years old and I am still insured during this period. If you are 35 years old now, you just have to pay premium until you reach 55 years old i.e. you just have to pay 20 years premium. Besides that, you also enjoy renewal bonus of 5 % every year up to 5 policy years. If you buy the plan with sum assured of RM 100,000, after five years, your sum assured will be RM 125,000 (guaranteed), instead of RM 100,000.

Before you make any decision, please feel free to read my blog:

http://lokeaiaberhad.blogspot.com/

After reading my blog, please feel free to leave me a comment or email to help me to improve my blog to help more consumers in dealing with buying the right insurance plan.

Thanks...
cuebiz
post Mar 4 2009, 10:44 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
992 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(suzannetan @ Mar 2 2009, 04:02 PM)
Thanks for the reply, so this one should be with Medical Card which covers most of the hospitalization stuffs as usual..

Hmm sounds pretty worth, I understand that ING's medical card+investment link, cost at least RM250 for my age, which is way too pricy for me. This one sounds much better, I don't really bother is there any investment link, just a medical card is good enough for me
*
A standalone medical card should cost you less than RM100 per month from most insurance company. However, If I am not mistaken, there is no monthly payment mode for standalone plan.

Most agent will bundle with Life, CI or investment so that it cost more and they can get more commission. At the end of the day, having a good servicing agent is better than just looking at the cost alone.
lcl832002
post Mar 5 2009, 12:01 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(cuebiz @ Mar 4 2009, 11:44 PM)
A standalone medical card should cost you less than RM100 per month from most insurance company. However, If I am not mistaken, there is no monthly payment mode for standalone plan.

Most agent will bundle with Life, CI or investment so that it cost more and they can get more commission. At the end of the day, having a good servicing agent is better than just looking at the cost alone.
*
Yes, cuebiz. You are right. Most agents are like that. However, we must understand that an insurance agent is actually running a business on himself. When we talk about business, it is usually profit-oriented. I don't think there is something wrong for agents to do like that if a consumer has the insurance needs and the agents are doing their works responsibly. Consumers pay premiums to insurance agents and get financial protections from insurance companies. After that, insurance agents get commissions from insurance companies and provide after sales services to their customers. It is actually a win-win situation for all the people involved in the sales.

This post has been edited by lcl832002: Mar 5 2009, 12:01 AM
TSxuzen
post Mar 5 2009, 05:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Just to update you people:

I bought my CI from my regular agent (AIA): premium RM 537.00 p.a. for SA RM 50K.

I also increased my med card to a life time limit of RM 500K, premium abt RM 800.00 p.a.

Call me kiasu for taking such high coverage, but I know that illness is a definite thing, and I want to be well taken care off during my down-time.

Xuzen.
raylimfs
post Mar 5 2009, 06:41 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


good thing you did there xuzen. all the best to you.
mtsen
post Mar 5 2009, 06:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


very good indeed smile.gif
lcl832002
post Mar 5 2009, 06:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(xuzen @ Mar 5 2009, 06:34 PM)
Just to update you people:

I bought my CI from my regular agent (AIA): premium RM 537.00 p.a. for SA RM 50K.

I also increased my med card to a life time limit of RM 500K, premium abt RM 800.00 p.a.

Call me kiasu for taking such high coverage, but I know that illness is a definite thing, and I want to be well taken care off during my down-time.

Xuzen.
*
xuzen, congratulations to you because you know the reality and take action without hesitation...

<< MY LIFE AS AN INSURANCE AGENT >>
huakenny
post Mar 5 2009, 10:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: KK ,MUAR, SELANGOR, KL, KUDAT, PUTATAN, SERDANG


medical card or insurance is good to buy...

i were admit into Pantai Hospital,cheras las month due to some illness....it comes so sudden and i were sent i by my fren.

i bring no cash but just my medical card...its under AIA, a platinum medical card...

gv it to the counter and i were sent in to emergency ward with no questions ask....

i did all the scanning,x-ray.etc and stay 1 nite at hospital.

overall im hapy it AIA card
lcl832002
post Mar 5 2009, 11:18 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(huakenny @ Mar 5 2009, 11:48 PM)
medical card or insurance is good to buy...

i were admit into Pantai Hospital,cheras las month due to some illness....it comes so sudden and i were sent i by my fren.

i bring no cash but just my medical card...its under AIA, a platinum medical card...

gv it to the counter and i were sent in to emergency ward with no questions ask....

i did all the scanning,x-ray.etc and stay 1 nite at hospital.

overall im hapy it AIA card
*
It is great to hear that, huakenny...
eimira
post Mar 18 2009, 04:13 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kelana Jaya



QUOTE(xuzen @ Mar 5 2009, 05:34 PM)
Just to update you people:

I bought my CI from my regular agent (AIA): premium RM 537.00 p.a. for SA RM 50K.

I also increased my med card to a life time limit of RM 500K, premium abt RM 800.00 p.a.

Call me kiasu for taking such high coverage, but I know that illness is a definite thing, and I want to be well taken care off during my down-time.

Xuzen.
*
i believe im more kiasu than u are!

i have 2 PRU medical cards with lifetime limits totaling to almost rm1 mill
(Pru and Prubsn Takaful)

my wifey and son too... hehehe
bbjslee
post Mar 18 2009, 08:55 AM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 18 2009, 04:13 AM)
i believe im more kiasu than u are!

i have 2 PRU medical cards with lifetime limits totaling to almost rm1 mill
(Pru and Prubsn Takaful)

my wifey and son too...  hehehe
*
Why do you get 2 medical card from the same company amounting to 1Mil i/o 1 medical from the same company amounting to 1 Mil?

If not mistaken now Prudential's medical card highest limit is up to 1.5 Mil.

If you take 2 different company's medical card, it is more logical. In case Insurance Company A cannot claim, then claim Insurance Company B.

Anyway, what's your room&board daily limit?
mtsen
post Mar 18 2009, 10:16 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


got pro and cons also, if get from same company, claim once only, else must claim twice and only one original receipt, leceh ...
eimira
post Mar 18 2009, 11:13 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kelana Jaya



QUOTE(bbjslee @ Mar 18 2009, 08:55 AM)
Why do you get 2 medical card from the same company amounting to 1Mil i/o 1 medical from the same company amounting to 1 Mil?

If not mistaken now Prudential's medical card highest limit is up to 1.5 Mil.

If you take 2 different company's medical card, it is more logical. In case Insurance Company A cannot claim, then claim Insurance Company B.

Anyway, what's your room&board daily limit?
*
both card room & board of rm200 per day.

one with limits of rm750k and another rm225k.


the reason why is easy. - i love the idea of fixed premium till age 70 and all my payments go to savings.
lcl832002
post Mar 18 2009, 12:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 18 2009, 12:13 PM)
both card room & board of rm200 per day.

one with limits of rm750k and another rm225k.
the reason why is easy. - i love the idea of fixed premium till age 70 and all my payments go to savings.
*
Are you sure your medical card has fixed premium untill you reach 70 years old? Is it a rider or a standalone?
eimira
post Mar 18 2009, 10:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kelana Jaya



QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 18 2009, 12:03 PM)
Are you sure your medical card has fixed premium untill you reach 70 years old? Is it a rider or a standalone?
*
positive. it is a rider of the prulink account.

This post has been edited by eimira: Mar 18 2009, 10:40 PM
lcl832002
post Mar 19 2009, 12:02 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 18 2009, 11:40 PM)
positive. it is a rider of the prulink account.
*
From I know, the premium of any medical card is not fixed either it is bought as a standalone plan or a rider.

When you attach a medical card to an Investment Linked Plan (ILP), the premium of the medical card is not fixed. Then, why you don't have to pay more when its premium increases in the future? It is because if your ILP performs well, you will get a higher cash value. So, the increase in the premium of the your medical card will be paid by your cash value. When your ILP doesn't perform well, you have to pay yourself by adding premium in the future.

This is what I know about ILP from the complaints from insurance consumers... But I never say that ILP is a bad product... It is just that you have to take some risk. Nothing is guaranteed in ILP.

This post has been edited by lcl832002: Mar 19 2009, 12:04 AM
eimira
post Mar 19 2009, 01:02 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kelana Jaya



QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 19 2009, 12:02 AM)
From I know, the premium of any medical card is not fixed either it is bought as a standalone plan or a rider.

When you attach a medical card to an Investment Linked Plan (ILP), the premium of the medical card is not fixed. Then, why you don't have to pay more when its premium increases in the future? It is because if your ILP performs well, you will get a higher cash value. So, the increase in the premium of the your medical card will be paid by your cash value. When your ILP doesn't perform well, you have to pay yourself by adding premium in the future.

This is what I know about ILP from the complaints from insurance consumers... But I never say that ILP is a bad product... It is just that you have to take some risk. Nothing is guaranteed in ILP.
*
i agree...
the guaranteed part is only "if critical illness or death should occurs to me, all the future premiums are waived. Pru will pay the future premiums not only for me, but wifey and son too." - im paying rm2500/mth for the whole family.

PRU pays future premiums till age 100/death for me n wifey and age 25 for my son!
FREE Premiums for my family - thus my savings will increase even tho i PAY nothing.

p/s- a friend of mine was diagnosed of leukemia (blood cancer) last year. He paid premiums of rm3k/mth for the whole family. All the hospitals bills are paid for (except co-insurance of max RM1000) and the BEST part, PRU is now paying RM3k/mth for his whole family. He paid nothing!!! Thank GOD, he is still alive and recovering....


WHY worry about uncertainties (ILP price fluctuations)? THE thing you should worry about is the thing that is MOST CERTAIN ---> DEATH / ILLNESSES.

just my two cents.

This post has been edited by eimira: Mar 19 2009, 01:15 AM
bbjslee
post Mar 19 2009, 09:09 AM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 19 2009, 01:02 AM)
i agree...
the guaranteed part is only "if critical illness or death should occurs to me, all the future premiums are waived. Pru will pay the future premiums not only for me, but wifey and son too."  - im paying rm2500/mth for the whole family.

PRU pays future premiums till age 100/death for me n wifey and age 25 for my son!
FREE Premiums for my family - thus my savings will increase even tho i PAY nothing.

p/s- a friend of mine was diagnosed of leukemia (blood cancer) last year. He paid premiums of rm3k/mth for the whole family. All the hospitals bills are paid for (except co-insurance of max RM1000) and the BEST part, PRU is now paying RM3k/mth for his whole family. He paid nothing!!! Thank GOD, he is still alive and recovering....
WHY worry about uncertainties (ILP price fluctuations)? THE thing you should worry about is the thing that is MOST CERTAIN ---> DEATH / ILLNESSES.

just my two cents.
*
What you have is actually a waiver. It is very common nowadays for most Insurance Products.
Did you add in the waiver for your wife & son as well?

- If your wife/son diagnosed with DD or TPD, is their future insurance premium waived?

If you have added in as well, congratulations!! biggrin.gif
mtsen
post Mar 19 2009, 09:20 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 19 2009, 12:02 AM)
From I know, the premium of any medical card is not fixed either it is bought as a standalone plan or a rider.

When you attach a medical card to an Investment Linked Plan (ILP), the premium of the medical card is not fixed. Then, why you don't have to pay more when its premium increases in the future? It is because if your ILP performs well, you will get a higher cash value. So, the increase in the premium of the your medical card will be paid by your cash value. When your ILP doesn't perform well, you have to pay yourself by adding premium in the future.

This is what I know about ILP from the complaints from insurance consumers... But I never say that ILP is a bad product... It is just that you have to take some risk. Nothing is guaranteed in ILP.
*
well, don't forget the poitical side of this story is that Prudential top ILP in this region so other insurance companies who didn't catch up on ILP trend will usually say things like above. Its just a matter of which angle you look into the same issue and what action you need to take about it.

in addition, to my knowledge its the subsequent follower in ILP who are kind of 'spoil' the market by quoting rediculously high return in their proposal and these are usually bank based insurance division and not the fully life operated insurance divisions.

lapse ILP policies also have to do with buyer where buyers got greedy and pick the one 'most appealing return' without focusing on the coverage when talk about insurance. Almost like the scam cases we hear day to day about scratch lottery ...


Added on March 19, 2009, 9:23 amI agree to buy H&S and medical plan separate from the normal life plan because its nature is different than other insurances.

basically keep one account to pay others ( parents, wife, kids )

and keep another account to pay yourself ( medical, PA etc )

that way, either way paying too much to yourself or others in any incident wouldn't hurt the other party ... smile.gif

This post has been edited by mtsen: Mar 19 2009, 09:23 AM
lcl832002
post Mar 19 2009, 01:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 19 2009, 02:02 AM)
i agree...
the guaranteed part is only "if critical illness or death should occurs to me, all the future premiums are waived. Pru will pay the future premiums not only for me, but wifey and son too."  - im paying rm2500/mth for the whole family.

PRU pays future premiums till age 100/death for me n wifey and age 25 for my son!
FREE Premiums for my family - thus my savings will increase even tho i PAY nothing.

p/s- a friend of mine was diagnosed of leukemia (blood cancer) last year. He paid premiums of rm3k/mth for the whole family. All the hospitals bills are paid for (except co-insurance of max RM1000) and the BEST part, PRU is now paying RM3k/mth for his whole family. He paid nothing!!! Thank GOD, he is still alive and recovering....
WHY worry about uncertainties (ILP price fluctuations)? THE thing you should worry about is the thing that is MOST CERTAIN ---> DEATH / ILLNESSES.

just my two cents.
*
I just wonder. Is it possible to have a medical card with fixed premium? I have no doubt that the protection for ILP is good. I just tell you why your medical card attaching to your ILP is fixed. That's all. smile.gif


QUOTE(mtsen @ Mar 19 2009, 10:20 AM)
well, don't forget the poitical side of this story is that Prudential top ILP in this region so other insurance companies who didn't catch up on ILP trend will usually say things like above.  Its just a matter of which angle you look into the same issue and what action you need to take about it.

in addition, to my knowledge its the subsequent follower in ILP who are kind of 'spoil' the market by quoting rediculously high return in their proposal and these are usually bank based insurance division and not the fully life operated insurance divisions.

lapse ILP policies also have to do with buyer where buyers got greedy and pick the one 'most appealing return' without focusing on the coverage when talk about insurance.  Almost like the scam cases we hear day to day about scratch lottery ...


Added on March 19, 2009, 9:23 amI agree to buy H&S and medical plan separate from the normal life plan because its nature is different than other insurances.

basically keep one account to pay others ( parents, wife, kids )

and keep another account to pay yourself ( medical, PA etc )

that way, either way paying too much to yourself or others in any incident wouldn't hurt the other party ... smile.gif
*
Hello, when I say something like that, it is just a advice. I hear too much complaints from my clients and friends about ILP. I gain nothing from telling eimira the weaknesses of ILP. He will not buy anything from me, right... I will never criticise other insurance companies. All insurance agents are from the same line. So, it is pointless that we say something bad about other insurance companies. I will only tell my prospects the facts and figures. Then, let them to judge themselves.
eimira
post Mar 19 2009, 06:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kelana Jaya



QUOTE(bbjslee @ Mar 19 2009, 09:09 AM)
What you have is actually a waiver. It is very common nowadays for most Insurance Products.
Did you add in the waiver for your wife & son as well?

- If your wife/son diagnosed with DD or TPD, is their future insurance premium waived?

If you have added in as well, congratulations!!  biggrin.gif
*
from what i understand, it is not waiver. It is payor.

There is slight different between waiver and payor right? hmm.gif correct me if i'm wrong.

waiver means the premiums are waived. policy is still inforce and savings doesnt increase.

payor means premiums are waived. policy is still inforce and ins company now pays the premium into my account. Savings does increase.


Yes of course, i added the payor to my policy, wifey and son. thumbup.gif
bbjslee
post Mar 19 2009, 07:09 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 19 2009, 06:52 PM)
from what i understand, it is not waiver. It is payor.

There is slight different between waiver and payor right?  hmm.gif  correct me if i'm wrong.

waiver means the premiums are waived. policy is still inforce and savings doesnt increase.

payor means premiums are waived. policy is still inforce and ins company now pays the premium into my account. Savings does increase.
Yes of course, i added the payor to my policy, wifey and son.  thumbup.gif
*
Hmm... you got it right about payor & waiver.
Normally with payor also only means future premiums waived, doesn't mean savings increase. Is this the PruTakaful or the normal ILP? Wonder how it works, must get my hands on one of the policy to have a look.
eimira
post Mar 21 2009, 11:10 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kelana Jaya



QUOTE(bbjslee @ Mar 19 2009, 07:09 PM)
Hmm... you got it right about payor & waiver.
Normally with payor also only means future premiums waived, doesn't mean savings increase. Is this the PruTakaful or the normal ILP? Wonder how it works, must get my hands on one of the policy to have a look.
*
payor means future premiums waived for individual and PRU will pay monthly whatever premiums waived to the individual account thus will lead to increased savings.



This post has been edited by eimira: Mar 21 2009, 11:12 AM
bbjslee
post Mar 21 2009, 07:01 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 21 2009, 11:10 AM)
payor means future premiums waived for individual and PRU will pay monthly whatever premiums waived to the individual account thus will lead to increased savings.
*
When future premiums waived means PRU already paying for your premiums.
Example:
Father pay for Son's policy, premium 100/month.
Father had heart attack.
Pru will pay the premium 100/month, father do not have to pay any more. Hence considered waived.

What you're telling me if I'm not mistaken is that,
Pru will pay the premium 100/month AND another 100/month towards saving.

Do correct me if I'm wrong.
Or any other Pru agent here can clarify?
mtsen
post Mar 21 2009, 11:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 19 2009, 01:41 PM)
I just wonder. Is it possible to have a medical card with fixed premium? I have no doubt that the protection for ILP is good. I just tell you why your medical card attaching to your ILP is fixed. That's all. smile.gif
Hello, when I say something like that, it is just a advice. I hear too much complaints from my clients and friends about ILP. I gain nothing from telling eimira the weaknesses of ILP. He will not buy anything from me, right... I will never criticise other insurance companies. All insurance agents are from the same line. So, it is pointless that we say something bad about other insurance companies. I will only tell my prospects the facts and figures. Then, let them to judge themselves.
*
true, quite a handful ppl are burn by ILP, mostly due to their initial greed accepting high return figures during sales stage ...


Added on March 21, 2009, 11:19 pm
QUOTE(bbjslee @ Mar 21 2009, 07:01 PM)
When future premiums waived means PRU already paying for your premiums.
Example:
Father pay for Son's policy, premium 100/month.
Father had heart attack.
Pru will pay the premium 100/month, father do not have to pay any more. Hence considered waived.

What you're telling me if I'm not mistaken is that,
Pru will pay the premium 100/month AND another 100/month towards saving.

Do correct me if I'm wrong.
Or any other Pru agent here can clarify?
*
need to see her actual policy for correct details but I 'think' Pru has the normal waiver for the payor, they also have waiver for the spouse of the payor and the waiver for the insured, all 3 can be different.

on top of that, they have income rider to provide some income like the one you mention above ...

nowadays insurance has so many features its really pening kepala smile.gif

This post has been edited by mtsen: Mar 21 2009, 11:19 PM
Colaboy
post Mar 22 2009, 04:14 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


QUOTE(bbjslee @ Mar 18 2009, 08:55 AM)
Why do you get 2 medical card from the same company amounting to 1Mil i/o 1 medical from the same company amounting to 1 Mil?

If not mistaken now Prudential's medical card highest limit is up to 1.5 Mil.

If you take 2 different company's medical card, it is more logical. In case Insurance Company A cannot claim, then claim Insurance Company B.

Anyway, what's your room&board daily limit?
*
at the meantime i think is GE with the biggest sum assured & lifetime limit for medical plan . . .
basically no point getting 2 medical card from 2 different company ..... if you really needs to insured more why dont just upgrade ur plan
you cant claim from both cards although you have 2


QUOTE(bbjslee @ Mar 21 2009, 07:01 PM)
When future premiums waived means PRU already paying for your premiums.
Example:
Father pay for Son's policy, premium 100/month.
Father had heart attack.
Pru will pay the premium 100/month, father do not have to pay any more. Hence considered waived.

What you're telling me if I'm not mistaken is that,
Pru will pay the premium 100/month AND another 100/month towards saving.

Do correct me if I'm wrong.
Or any other Pru agent here can clarify?
*
It's case by case . . what you are saying above are refering to "payor" in a ILP i guess

a waiver for the policy - if 36 Illness strike on the policy owner/life assured/spouse (if included) the policy will go on free for life
hence the client will still enjoy all the benefits but the cash value will not increase

a payor for the policy - if 36 Illness strike on the policy owner/life assured/spouse (if included) the policy will go on free for life
hence the client will still enjoy all the benefits & additional premium located to purchase of units monthly which paid by PRU

QUOTE(mtsen @ Mar 21 2009, 11:16 PM)
true, quite a handful ppl are burn by ILP, mostly due to their initial greed accepting high return figures during sales stage ...

*
i still have a strong believe in ILP product which are good to the market . . . different ppl different opinion




This post has been edited by Colaboy: Mar 22 2009, 04:23 PM
lcl832002
post Mar 22 2009, 06:30 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(Colaboy @ Mar 22 2009, 05:14 PM)
at the meantime i think is GE with the biggest sum assured & lifetime limit for medical plan . . .
basically no point getting 2 medical card from 2 different company ..... if you really needs to insured more why dont just upgrade ur plan
you cant claim from both cards although you have 2
*
Ya, we can't claim from both medical cards. But, if one medical card is not enough to cover our medical bills, we can use the other one to cover the balance.

I agree with bbjslee and think that buying two medical cards from two different insurance companies is better than upgrading our existing medical card to a larger plan. It is because different insurance companies have their own panel hospitals. If we can't claim from insurance company A, we may try to claim from insurance company B...

This post has been edited by lcl832002: Mar 22 2009, 06:32 PM
mtsen
post Mar 25 2009, 01:56 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(Colaboy @ Mar 22 2009, 04:14 PM)
i still have a strong believe in ILP product which are good to the market . . . different ppl different opinion
*
Prudential ILP is ok in general (did not over sell profit), agents are quite well trained too, other local companies are not as good ...


Added on March 25, 2009, 1:57 am
QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 22 2009, 06:30 PM)
Ya, we can't claim from both medical cards. But, if one medical card is not enough to cover our medical bills, we can use the other one to cover the balance.

I agree with bbjslee and think that buying two medical cards from two different insurance companies is better than upgrading our existing medical card to a larger plan. It is because different insurance companies have their own panel hospitals. If we can't claim from insurance company A, we may try to claim from insurance company B...
*
i oso agree getting from different insurers are better...

This post has been edited by mtsen: Mar 25 2009, 01:57 AM
richnet
post Mar 26 2009, 02:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
279 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 22 2009, 06:30 PM)
Ya, we can't claim from both medical cards. But, if one medical card is not enough to cover our medical bills, we can use the other one to cover the balance.

I agree with bbjslee and think that buying two medical cards from two different insurance companies is better than upgrading our existing medical card to a larger plan. It is because different insurance companies have their own panel hospitals. If we can't claim from insurance company A, we may try to claim from insurance company B...
*
Loke,
sorry, but please bear in mind that you are not allowed to claim the balance from another medical card. One claim can only be claim on one particular medical card.

bbjslee,
what was mentioned about the payor/waiver is actually a so-called cross-waiver thing. For you, in GE, it's called Payer Benefit Plus.

It should be done like this:
- Father (Payer), Mother (LA)
- Mother (Payer), Father (LA)
- Father (Payer), Son (LA)
** All proposals are done with Waiver Premium Plus as well.
I hope you get the idea of this. There are pros and cons of doing this.


For the medical card, there are no guaranteed premiums. Guaranteed Premiums is a term that usually agent will use to increase the attractive-ness of their sales, but bear in mind, the agent is making a big mistake by misleading, I'm not gonna discuss about the consequences, but I would like to clear of some misleading part here.

For Investment-Linked plan, policy fees and insurance charges are deducted from the investment funds, please do look back at your investment link statement from time to time on this. Which means, insurance charges do includes the Medical Card rider that have been attached in the plan. And so, medical card charges increases over years, but at the same time, your investment units that sold from time to time have been accumulated. Therefore, you won't see much risk having your premium to be increase BUT there are still chances that your premium would be increase.

These risk are that when unit funds value drops tremendously, and while your insurance charges is higher than your investment return, then you'll have to bear the differences.

FYI, ILP is not an actual savings plan. Agents always like to use the term 'savings', which sounds good, but in fact, it doesn't really apply. In year 2008, market drops, most companies projected their investment return is at 9% or 10% or some even higher. What comes true in 2008 are that majority funds are in negative value. So, please tell me, what's the savings here?
bbjslee
post Mar 26 2009, 09:01 AM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(richnet @ Mar 26 2009, 02:12 AM)
Loke,
sorry, but please bear in mind that you are not allowed to claim the balance from another medical card. One claim can only be claim on one particular medical card.
You can claim the balance from another medical card.

QUOTE
bbjslee,
what was mentioned about the payor/waiver is actually a so-called cross-waiver thing. For you, in GE, it's called Payer Benefit Plus.

It should be done like this:
- Father (Payer), Mother (LA)
- Mother (Payer), Father (LA)
- Father (Payer), Son (LA)
** All proposals are done with Waiver Premium Plus as well.
I hope you get the idea of this. There are pros and cons of doing this.
I know about this, but the poster said "additional saving", now how does that happen when all the insurance plan did was just waived future premiums.

QUOTE
For Investment-Linked plan, policy fees and insurance charges are deducted from the investment funds, please do look back at your investment link statement from time to time on this. Which means, insurance charges do includes the Medical Card rider that have been attached in the plan. And so, medical card charges increases over years, but at the same time, your investment units that sold from time to time have been accumulated. Therefore, you won't see much risk having your premium to be increase BUT there are still chances that your premium would be increase.

These risk are that when unit funds value drops tremendously, and while your insurance charges is higher than your investment return, then you'll have to bear the differences.

FYI, ILP is not an actual savings plan. Agents always like to use the term 'savings', which sounds good, but in fact, it doesn't really apply. In year 2008, market drops, most companies projected their investment return is at 9% or 10% or some even higher. What comes true in 2008 are that majority funds are in negative value. So, please tell me, what's the savings here?
*
Yes you are right here. Well, unit trust agent also say put rm100/month into their so and so fund and treat it as "saving". "Saving" has been a much abused word.

richnet
post Mar 26 2009, 10:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
279 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(bbjslee @ Mar 26 2009, 09:01 AM)
You can claim the balance from another medical card.
*
ooopsss.. sorry... yea.. you are right.. smile.gif
lcl832002
post Mar 26 2009, 01:13 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(richnet @ Mar 26 2009, 11:55 AM)
ooopsss.. sorry... yea.. you are right.. smile.gif
*
Are you an agent???

This post has been edited by lcl832002: Mar 26 2009, 01:15 PM
richnet
post Mar 26 2009, 02:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
279 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 26 2009, 01:13 PM)
Are you an agent???
*
that would be up to you to decide....
I'm just a passer-by last night where I couldn't get into sleep late night.
Just some knowledge sharing of what's going on the market currently.

You can treat me as Agent, Advisor, Life Planner, Underwritter, Unit Manager, Group Manager, as you like.
I'm just here to share. smile.gif
lcl832002
post Mar 26 2009, 06:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(richnet @ Mar 26 2009, 03:35 PM)
that would be up to you to decide....
I'm just a passer-by last night where I couldn't get into sleep late night.
Just some knowledge sharing of what's going on the market currently.

You can treat me as Agent, Advisor, Life Planner, Underwritter, Unit Manager, Group Manager, as you like.
I'm just here to share. smile.gif
*
I don't think that you are sharing because of the way you respond. You are challenging people here, not sharing...
richnet
post Mar 27 2009, 01:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
279 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 26 2009, 06:22 PM)
I don't think that you are sharing because of the way you respond. You are challenging people here, not sharing...
*
I do not wanted to disclose my identity to you because I don't want you to use a different when you do sharing and I read thru posts that you have made, almost all post, you keep telling people how your company performs. People are not blind or deaf, they know how thing goes on the market. I do not wanted to condemn anyone but please do understand that, we are here to share of what knowledge we have got, not showing off to others that how your company can do and what others cannot offer. The way you talk in forum, it's the kind of forummer that I won't really give respect to.

I am a very fair person, I will respect you if you respect others as well. If you can change your attitude abit in this forum, I can tell you, people will change their view on you as well.

lcl832002
post Mar 27 2009, 12:24 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(richnet @ Mar 27 2009, 02:38 AM)
I do not wanted to disclose my identity to you because I don't want you to use a different when you do sharing and I read thru posts that you have made, almost all post, you keep telling people how your company performs. People are not blind or deaf, they know how thing goes on the market. I do not wanted to condemn anyone but please do understand that, we are here to share of what knowledge we have got, not showing off to others that how your company can do and what others cannot offer. The way you talk in forum, it's the kind of forummer that I won't really give respect to.

I am a very fair person, I will respect you if you respect others as well. If you can change your attitude abit in this forum, I can tell you, people will change their view on you as well.
*
Hahahahaha... Thank you ...
mtsen
post Mar 27 2009, 11:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(richnet @ Mar 26 2009, 02:35 PM)
that would be up to you to decide....
I'm just a passer-by last night where I couldn't get into sleep late night.
Just some knowledge sharing of what's going on the market currently.

You can treat me as Agent, Advisor, Life Planner, Underwritter, Unit Manager, Group Manager, as you like.
I'm just here to share. smile.gif
*
can I treat you as my payor then ?

QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 26 2009, 06:22 PM)
I don't think that you are sharing because of the way you respond. You are challenging people here, not sharing...
*
ha ha, now you are challenging him ... and sorry I have been challenging randomly as well ....


Just to re-emphasize on 'cannot claim from 2 different medical plans' to the newbies, if u buy 50k medical from company A and another 100k from company B

if your total bill is 40k, you can claim from A OR B only, not both
if your total bill is 90k, you should claim from B
if your total bill is 110k, you claim 100k from B first, then 10K from A

when claiming 100k from B, you have to state there the rest of the 10K will be bear by A and that usually will be taken care off.

the same applies if you buy 2 different plan X and Y from the same company C.
hope this helps ...

This post has been edited by mtsen: Mar 27 2009, 11:55 PM
lcl832002
post Mar 28 2009, 12:31 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(mtsen @ Mar 28 2009, 12:54 AM)
Just to re-emphasize on 'cannot claim from 2 different medical plans' to the newbies, if u buy 50k medical from company A and another 100k from company B

if your total bill is 40k, you can claim from A OR B only, not both
if your total bill is 90k, you should claim from B
if your total bill is 110k, you claim 100k from B first, then 10K from A

when claiming 100k from B, you have to state there the rest of the 10K will be bear by A and that usually will be taken care off.

the same applies if you buy 2 different plan X and Y from the same company C.
hope this helps ...
*
Thanks for your explanation... biggrin.gif
cherroy
post Mar 28 2009, 10:00 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


There is a previous thread discussing similar issue which has been closed and beign diverted into this thread. The link is http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/725230/+60 for ease for reference.

Thank you for the cooperation.
JamesPond
post Apr 6 2009, 02:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,526 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
In the market,
how many selling insurance card?
any agent here? pls pm me....thanks...

jeff_v2
post Apr 6 2009, 06:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
965 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


CIMB will soon lunch a new Insurance package that catter mdeical and critical ilnesses...
sound like a good product
mtsen
post Apr 8 2009, 12:43 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


cost effectiveness wise, I would compare with

http://safepay.com.my/ins101.asp

Annual Premium Payable MYR 1,228
Life and TPD
Personal Accident
Critical Illness MYR 100,000 Sum Assured
Medical Plan MYR 25,000 Annual Limit


This post has been edited by mtsen: Apr 8 2009, 12:45 AM
nevertheless
post Apr 8 2009, 11:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(mtsen @ Apr 8 2009, 12:43 AM)
cost effectiveness wise, I would compare with

http://safepay.com.my/ins101.asp

Annual Premium Payable MYR 1,228
Life and TPD
Personal Accident
Critical Illness MYR 100,000 Sum Assured
Medical Plan MYR 25,000 Annual Limit
*
the website looks funny. I cant see most of the pictures, or something;s wrong with my connection?
p3nang
post Apr 9 2009, 11:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


why the website so .....

joo
post Apr 10 2009, 12:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
22 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 19 2009, 11:50 AM)
Hello teachers,

I am in the market to look for a critical illness insurance plan. To be precise... basic plan,  not those tied up with investment link etc.

Can you please advise?

Thank you.

Xuzen.
*
i do a lot of research on insurance and saving plan on these few months.

i found out that most of the insurance agents didnt tell you the truth, such as the hidden fees, un-protectation part...and so on. so disappointed mad.gif

for my advice is ask many insurance agent as u can ( even they r from same company, they always tell the diff story)

one of my insurance friend told me that insurance is very simple just for protection, not more than that.
for example, if u wan add on saving plan, why dont u go to bank? this is what the bank for.

dont believe on what they said.....medical plus saving (bull shit vmad.gif )

lcl832002
post Apr 10 2009, 12:19 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(joo @ Apr 10 2009, 01:09 AM)
i do a lot of research on insurance and saving plan on these few months.

i found out that most of the insurance agents didnt tell you the truth, such as the hidden fees, un-protectation part...and so on. so disappointed  mad.gif

for my advice is ask many insurance agent as u can ( even they r from same company, they always tell the diff story)

one of my insurance friend told me that insurance is very simple just for protection, not more than that.
for example, if u wan add on saving plan, why dont u go to bank? this is what the bank for.

dont believe on what they said.....medical plus saving (bull shit vmad.gif )
*
So, did you meet honest agents???
chew_ronnie
post Apr 10 2009, 09:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(joo @ Apr 10 2009, 12:09 AM)
i do a lot of research on insurance and saving plan on these few months.

i found out that most of the insurance agents didnt tell you the truth, such as the hidden fees, un-protectation part...and so on. so disappointed  mad.gif

for my advice is ask many insurance agent as u can ( even they r from same company, they always tell the diff story)

one of my insurance friend told me that insurance is very simple just for protection, not more than that.
for example, if u wan add on saving plan, why dont u go to bank? this is what the bank for.

dont believe on what they said.....medical plus saving (bull shit vmad.gif )
*
Joo,

I liked what u've said although i'm an agent myself! There is no such thing as medical plus savings. Medical is medical. Savings is savings. You can't get both good in one policy! All are just selling gimmicks and BS.






p3nang
post Apr 10 2009, 05:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


ya, medical and saving are 2 different policy, but sometime it comes together as one basic plan and one rider
mtsen
post Apr 13 2009, 02:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(nevertheless @ Apr 8 2009, 11:54 AM)
the website looks funny. I cant see most of the pictures, or something;s wrong with my connection?
*
i think its the web site problem ... too IE oriented.
nonac
post Apr 13 2009, 03:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Apr 10 2009, 09:53 AM)
Joo,

I liked what u've said although i'm an agent myself! There is no such thing as medical plus savings. Medical is medical. Savings is savings. You can't get both good in one policy! All are just selling gimmicks and BS.
*
Why is it so hard to get this message across? Friends of mine have been so happy with their medical plus savings plan they shut me off from their first breath whenever I explain to them about basic insurance and savings. sad.gif

Is it that human will only learn it the hard way? rclxub.gif

p3nang
post Apr 13 2009, 04:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(nonac @ Apr 13 2009, 03:14 PM)
Why is it so hard to get this message across? Friends of mine have been so happy with their medical plus savings plan they shut me off from their first breath whenever I explain to them about basic insurance and savings. sad.gif

Is it that human will only learn it the hard way?  rclxub.gif
*
its very subjective one. different people have different preference.
chew_ronnie
post Apr 13 2009, 07:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(nonac @ Apr 13 2009, 03:14 PM)
Why is it so hard to get this message across? Friends of mine have been so happy with their medical plus savings plan they shut me off from their first breath whenever I explain to them about basic insurance and savings. sad.gif

Is it that human will only learn it the hard way?  rclxub.gif
*
This is a good 1. Hahaha
lcl832002
post Apr 13 2009, 08:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Different people have different needs...
mtsen
post Apr 15 2009, 11:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(nonac @ Apr 13 2009, 03:14 PM)
Why is it so hard to get this message across? Friends of mine have been so happy with their medical plus savings plan they shut me off from their first breath whenever I explain to them about basic insurance and savings. sad.gif

Is it that human will only learn it the hard way?  rclxub.gif
*
I think you need to learn more NLP, then may be message gets across easier ...

most ppl don't care about 'basic insurance and savings', but everyone is interested in getting their needs satisfied.
lcl832002
post Apr 16 2009, 01:28 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(mtsen @ Apr 16 2009, 12:30 AM)
I think you need to learn more NLP, then may be message gets across easier ...

most ppl don't care about 'basic insurance and savings', but everyone is interested in getting their needs satisfied.
*
I think most of the consumers in the market don't really know what their insurance needs are...

This post has been edited by lcl832002: Apr 16 2009, 01:28 AM
zzzxtreme
post Apr 20 2009, 09:41 AM

Synth Freak
*******
Senior Member
4,299 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Your girlfriend's bed


(hi sorry i don't know which topic is suitable)

I'm looking for a great health (not life) insurance in which my policy will continue even after the insurance company has paid compensation. Sort of like Western style health insurance, where they will not terminate your policy after an operation or something.

any recommendations? most local health insurance only pay compensation once, after that they don't want to extend the policy
richnet
post Apr 27 2009, 02:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
279 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(zzzxtreme @ Apr 20 2009, 09:41 AM)
(hi sorry i don't know which topic is suitable)

I'm looking for a great health (not life) insurance in which my policy will continue even after the insurance company has paid compensation. Sort of like Western style health insurance, where they will not terminate your policy after an operation or something.

any recommendations? most local health insurance only pay compensation once, after that they don't want to extend the policy
*
hmmm... maybe you have got confused of Critical Illness and Medical Card.
The one that you are mentioning should be Medical Card, which is yes, they will continue to cover you even after you've done your operation. smile.gif

lcl832002
post Apr 27 2009, 03:03 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


What a very professional advice... haha...
arsenal
post Apr 27 2009, 03:16 AM

THE GUNNERS
*******
Senior Member
2,354 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Apr 27 2009, 03:03 AM)
What a very professional advice... haha...
*
You got do CFA? I trust insurance agent who do CFA one...no CFA means hopeless one...!
secretsquirrel
post Apr 27 2009, 09:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Hey, lcl832002 & Ric - stay cool!

Jeje, treat you guys ice cream and or babe

user posted image


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Apr 27 2009, 03:03 AM)
What a very professional advice... haha...
*
This post has been edited by secretsquirrel: Apr 27 2009, 09:34 AM
bbjslee
post Apr 27 2009, 11:03 AM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(arsenal @ Apr 27 2009, 03:16 AM)
You got do CFA? I trust insurance agent who do CFA one...no CFA means hopeless one...!
*
What does CFA has to do with Insurance or Financial Planning?

Or was it a typo error?
ivanswk
post Apr 27 2009, 04:43 PM

+J
*******
Senior Member
2,110 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(arsenal @ Apr 27 2009, 03:16 AM)
You got do CFA? I trust insurance agent who do CFA one...no CFA means hopeless one...!
*
wah CFA so power meh ? tongue.gif
need to sign up aldi biggrin.gif
richnet
post Apr 27 2009, 05:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
279 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Apr 27 2009, 03:03 AM)
What a very professional advice... haha...
*
erm.. is this line for me?

p3nang
post Apr 27 2009, 05:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(bbjslee @ Apr 27 2009, 11:03 AM)
What does CFA has to do with Insurance or Financial Planning?

Or was it a typo error?
*
I thought is either CFP or RFP?
Does CFA has any direct matter with personal financial planning?

atake
post May 24 2009, 10:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Here is my situation :

1) <30 years old
2)My company will provide medical benefit until my retirement for our family (56 years old)
3)Currently have no major illness
4)My worried is after retired if i still with this company i will not be cover anymore and by that time it maybe too late for me to buy medical insurance as it will not cover any illness that i already have.

My question is :
1)What i need to do?Should i buy medical insurance now?
2)If yes, what type of medical insurance should i buy?My oficcemate bought a medical insurance with Prudential with RM150+ per month.He inform me this is investment link policy.Should i follow him?I don't have a good knowledge and experience with medical insurance buy i really plan to buy one for our family but don't know what to chooose.I surf Prudential and Great Eastern benefit but there is not enough information given there.
3)Some of my friend there is a lot of hidden clause in the medical insurance policy.Is it true?For e.g. insurance company change the clause without informing us such as room eligibility, and etc...
4)Which insurance company i should choose?From the blog i heard people said that Prudential is one of the best


Appreciate any reply...Thanks....
wufei
post May 24 2009, 11:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,039 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Laputa


i also want to know
YuNGSeNG
post May 25 2009, 12:52 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,382 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(atake @ May 24 2009, 10:38 PM)
Here is my situation :

1) <30 years old
2)My company will provide medical benefit until my retirement for our family (56 years old)
3)Currently have no major illness
4)My worried is after retired if i still with this company i will not be cover anymore and by that time it maybe too late for me to buy medical insurance as it will not cover any illness that i already have.

My question is :
1)What i need to do?Should i buy medical insurance now?
2)If yes, what type of medical insurance should i buy?My oficcemate bought a medical insurance with Prudential with RM150+ per month.He inform me this is investment link policy.Should i follow him?I don't have a good knowledge and experience with medical insurance buy i really plan to buy one for our family but don't know what to chooose.I surf Prudential and Great Eastern benefit but there is not enough information given there.
3)Some of my friend there is a lot of hidden clause in the medical insurance policy.Is it true?For e.g. insurance company change the clause without informing us such as room eligibility, and etc...
4)Which insurance company i should choose?From the blog i heard people said that Prudential is one of the best
Appreciate any reply...Thanks....
*
I try to answer your question.
Your company medical benefit is medical card or 36 critical illness ?

For medical card and 36 critical illness (note: both are different types of insurance):
If your company have provide medical card or 36 critical illness for you, you wouldn't need to buy medical card or 36 critical illness now. The oldest age eligible to buy your first medical card or first 36 critical illness from insurance company will be around 60 years old (may have plus minus 10 years due to different insurance company policy). Therefore, you can start buy your medical card or 36 critical illness after you retired if you already got it now.

There are no hidden clause in the medical insurance policy generally, and insurance company or agent will inform policy holder if insurance company change the clause.

There are many types of insurance actually, I will just simply explain to you each of them:

1. Medical card - Cover the expense when admit to hospital, must stay at least one night.

2. 36 critical illness - Insurance company will pay one lump sum money to the policy holder if the policy holder detected either one of the 36 critical illness.

3. Whole-Life insurance - Insurance company will pay one lump sum money to the policy holder if the policy holder death.

4. Endownment insurance (For long-term saving) - Insurance company will pay one lump sum money after the policy maturity OR Insurance company will pay the policy holder every year after policy maturity. In addition, insurance company will pay one lump sum money to the policy holder if the policy holder death.

5. Investment link insurance (high risk) - Same as Whole-Life Insurance but Whole-Life Insurance premium is fix every months. However, Investment link premium may not fixed. Insurance company will use some of your premium to invest in fund. If good return, the money will use for your future insurance premium, Eg: you pay RM150/month now, after 10 year, you are paying RM150/month also. If return bad, you may need to top up money for future insurance premium, Eg: you pay RM150/month now, after 10 year, you may need to pay RM160/month.

6. Total permanent disability (TPD) - Pay 1 lump sum to the policy holder if the policy holder is handicapped (eg: losing two hands). Normally TPD is come together with Life insurance.

There will be some condition in each types of insurance and it is hard to type all in here.


Added on May 25, 2009, 12:57 amIn addition, actually all the insurance companies such as AIA, Great Eastern, Prudential, ING and so on are similar. There will be some pro and con among the insurance companies, so there are no BEST insurance company.

This post has been edited by YuNGSeNG: May 25 2009, 12:57 AM
atake
post May 25 2009, 08:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
I try to answer your question.
Your company medical benefit is medical card or 36 critical illness ?
I think so.My company bought group medical insurance.I don't need to pay anything to get a treatment, hospitalization or etc until i retired.

For medical card and 36 critical illness (note: both are different types of insurance):
If your company have provide medical card or 36 critical illness for you, you wouldn't need to buy medical card or 36 critical illness now. The oldest age eligible to buy your first medical card or first 36 critical illness from insurance company will be around 60 years old (may have plus minus 10 years due to different insurance company policy). Therefore, you can start buy your medical card or 36 critical illness after you retired if you already got it now.

What happen if after i retired i got some major illness or disease .e.g. "kencing manis or darah tinggi".Will i be covered too if i only bought it after i retired?I thought medical coverage only covered if we don't have any illness yet when we bought it.If already have, it will not be covered.Appreciate ur answer.

mtsen
post May 25 2009, 09:58 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(atake @ May 24 2009, 10:38 PM)
Here is my situation :

1) <30 years old
2)My company will provide medical benefit until my retirement for our family (56 years old)
3)Currently have no major illness
4)My worried is after retired if i still with this company i will not be cover anymore and by that time it maybe too late for me to buy medical insurance as it will not cover any illness that i already have.

My question is :
1)What i need to do?Should i buy medical insurance now?
2)If yes, what type of medical insurance should i buy?My oficcemate bought a medical insurance with Prudential with RM150+ per month.He inform me this is investment link policy.Should i follow him?I don't have a good knowledge and experience with medical insurance buy i really plan to buy one for our family but don't know what to chooose.I surf Prudential and Great Eastern benefit but there is not enough information given there.
3)Some of my friend there is a lot of hidden clause in the medical insurance policy.Is it true?For e.g. insurance company change the clause without informing us such as room eligibility, and etc...
4)Which insurance company i should choose?From the blog i heard people said that Prudential is one of the best
Appreciate any reply...Thanks....
*
1)

a) buy major illness insurance
b) buy H&S for family members, lower priority on yourself
c) buy one plan that can fit in above 2 and yet give positive return at old age ( highest premium )

2) only if you like option 1c) above. if Prudential go for investment link, if GE go for the latest endowment or whole life plan.

3) all clauses are similar and most people don't read them so it 'appears' hidden. Yes insurance company has the right to do that and you have the right not to continue with them. This applies to H&S only, terms in Major Medical ( 36 illness etc. ) are more stable. Only H&S will evolve into less benefit or higher price within a short time. major medical should be quite stable.

4) no such thing as which company is the best. Most insurance companies are similar, if you don't plan to do all things youself, you will need an agent who can serve you. So picking the right agent for you is more important.

If you are in Kepong I know someone from ING and if you are in Taipan I know someone in Prudential biggrin.gif

lastly, are you sure you can work in this company till 56 ?

because ... if not, you will need a totally different set of advices

This post has been edited by mtsen: May 25 2009, 09:59 AM
Colaboy
post May 25 2009, 07:38 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


QUOTE(atake @ May 24 2009, 10:38 PM)
Here is my situation :

1) <30 years old
2)My company will provide medical benefit until my retirement for our family (56 years old)
3)Currently have no major illness
4)My worried is after retired if i still with this company i will not be cover anymore and by that time it maybe too late for me to buy medical insurance as it will not cover any illness that i already have.

My question is :
1)What i need to do?Should i buy medical insurance now?
2)If yes, what type of medical insurance should i buy?My oficcemate bought a medical insurance with Prudential with RM150+ per month.He inform me this is investment link policy.Should i follow him?I don't have a good knowledge and experience with medical insurance buy i really plan to buy one for our family but don't know what to chooose.I surf Prudential and Great Eastern benefit but there is not enough information given there.
3)Some of my friend there is a lot of hidden clause in the medical insurance policy.Is it true?For e.g. insurance company change the clause without informing us such as room eligibility, and etc...
4)Which insurance company i should choose?From the blog i heard people said that Prudential is one of the best
Appreciate any reply...Thanks....
*
1) Yes if you fell there's a need for you & your family members as you are the main person generating income for the family
Normally for this type of cases i'll advice my clients to get a Crictical Illness plan 1st & get a medical plan later when they are near to retirement

2) Hmmmm a link plan is okiz as you are still young & mayb you could get the basic such as CI/Life/Payor in the plan with RM150 a month
Medical is optional weather to include or not . . . but if include the basic coverage will not be sufficient

3)Everything is in black & white very transperant nowdays for insurance policy . . . & all client will have a 14 days free look period on the policy
If not satisfied with the term & condition, 100% money back guranteed

4)Yes we took over GE in terms of sales . . . but GE still remain the biggest in Malaysia in terms of sales force
Prudential/ING/AIA have a good reputation in claims thats from my point of view
But a responsible agent play the more important role rather than the company itself
p3nang
post May 26 2009, 12:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(atake @ May 24 2009, 10:38 PM)
Here is my situation :

1) <30 years old
2)My company will provide medical benefit until my retirement for our family (56 years old)
3)Currently have no major illness
4)My worried is after retired if i still with this company i will not be cover anymore and by that time it maybe too late for me to buy medical insurance as it will not cover any illness that i already have.

My question is :
1)What i need to do?Should i buy medical insurance now?
2)If yes, what type of medical insurance should i buy?My oficcemate bought a medical insurance with Prudential with RM150+ per month.He inform me this is investment link policy.Should i follow him?I don't have a good knowledge and experience with medical insurance buy i really plan to buy one for our family but don't know what to chooose.I surf Prudential and Great Eastern benefit but there is not enough information given there.
3)Some of my friend there is a lot of hidden clause in the medical insurance policy.Is it true?For e.g. insurance company change the clause without informing us such as room eligibility, and etc...
4)Which insurance company i should choose?From the blog i heard people said that Prudential is one of the best
Appreciate any reply...Thanks....
*
Hi, following others' financial planning is not encouraging. Because every person has different commitment and financial goal. So, a proper and customized planning is needed for your own.

numbertwo
post May 29 2009, 04:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(atake @ May 24 2009, 10:38 PM)
Here is my situation :

1) <30 years old
2)My company will provide medical benefit until my retirement for our family (56 years old)
3)Currently have no major illness
4)My worried is after retired if i still with this company i will not be cover anymore and by that time it maybe too late for me to buy medical insurance as it will not cover any illness that i already have.

My question is :
1)What i need to do?Should i buy medical insurance now?
2)If yes, what type of medical insurance should i buy?My oficcemate bought a medical insurance with Prudential with RM150+ per month.He inform me this is investment link policy.Should i follow him?I don't have a good knowledge and experience with medical insurance buy i really plan to buy one for our family but don't know what to chooose.I surf Prudential and Great Eastern benefit but there is not enough information given there.
3)Some of my friend there is a lot of hidden clause in the medical insurance policy.Is it true?For e.g. insurance company change the clause without informing us such as room eligibility, and etc...
4)Which insurance company i should choose?From the blog i heard people said that Prudential is one of the best
Appreciate any reply...Thanks....
*
I am in the same situation as yours now.

But I have a comment on some forummers' suggestion - buy the additional medical card after retirement..

Shouldn't we first look at the medical coverage that is bought by our company? I mean most of the time, company is buying the cheapest med card or lousy coverage, whichever that they can find ( at least my co. is! mad.gif ).

Assuming mine MC , it is covering :
1. Annual Limit of 50K
2. 12.5K per disability - isn't this evil?
3. a 200 board/room daily
4. In-patent, daycare, or out-patient (per disability) is as charged -
5. Out-patient Kidney / cancer treatment, max RM8K per annum only!
6. Accidental death - 3K.

and the premium is about RM370 if i remember correctly...

So, look back at point 2 - 12.5K , is that enuf to pay if one happens to step into operation theatre? I'm shivering after knowing the detailed of this plan!

So, getting an extra med card is a must now since age is catching up.. As I know if anything major happen before I grab another card, it will be tough for me to get one additional coverage later, surely some kind of exclusion will be there if ever any insurance co. even thought of offering me one.. Am I correct then?

So, now i'm looking for a top-up plan, which I've found out one just now.. Will post the details out in next post to share with you guys, let me know your view then...It is not from any of the Big Five or Six insurance co. though..

This post has been edited by numbertwo: May 29 2009, 04:51 PM
atake
post May 29 2009, 05:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
I still can't find the answer for the following :

1)Is it medical card will only covered for the illness that we don't have?My friend inform me that even when he purchased medical insurance from Prudential, there is no medical check up done.

2)What will happen if let say we never use the service and after maturity,what will happen to the money that we already paid.Is it will be refund or it consider 'hangus' as for hire purchase insurance.Paid every year but never claim it and next year paid a new one again.

3)What is the pro and con if i only bought this medical insurance after retirement?

4)Any other good suggestion?i read the friend medical insurance policy but i don't understand it fully.is there any way i can find a simplified or summarize insurance policy in a layman term?
bbjslee
post May 29 2009, 05:09 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(atake @ May 29 2009, 05:04 PM)
I still can't find the answer for the following :

1)Is it medical card will only covered for the illness that we don't have?My friend inform me that even when he purchased medical insurance from Prudential, there is no medical check up done.

2)What will happen if let say we never use the service and after maturity,what will happen to the money that we already paid.Is it will be refund or it consider 'hangus' as for hire purchase insurance.Paid every year but never claim it and next year paid a new one again.

3)What is the pro and con if i only bought this medical insurance after retirement?

4)Any other good suggestion?i read the friend medical insurance policy but i don't understand it fully.is there any way i can find a simplified or summarize insurance policy in a layman term?
*
Go find a few insurance agent from various companies, let them explain to you.
Then if you have any questions, you post here, we explain.
Don't always "friends say" they are not up to date with the newest insurance products, terms & conditions.

Unfortunately insurance policy is meant that way so that it can be used in court (in case of any dispute).
p3nang
post May 30 2009, 12:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(atake @ May 29 2009, 05:04 PM)
I still can't find the answer for the following :

1)Is it medical card will only covered for the illness that we don't have?My friend inform me that even when he purchased medical insurance from Prudential, there is no medical check up done.

2)What will happen if let say we never use the service and after maturity,what will happen to the money that we already paid.Is it will be refund or it consider 'hangus' as for hire purchase insurance.Paid every year but never claim it and next year paid a new one again.

3)What is the pro and con if i only bought this medical insurance after retirement?

4)Any other good suggestion?i read the friend medical insurance policy but i don't understand it fully.is there any way i can find a simplified or summarize insurance policy in a layman term?
*
The best way is meeting up a professional insurance representative to explain to you clearly by reviewing your existing policy.
TSxuzen
post May 30 2009, 02:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(atake @ May 29 2009, 05:04 PM)
I still can't find the answer for the following :
1)Is it medical card will only covered for the illness that we don't have?My friend inform me that even when he purchased medical insurance from Prudential, there is no medical check up done.

Medical Card covers your hospital bill only. There is usually a life time cap based on your premium. I read somewhere that your cap should be 10 times your current annual salary. MedCare covers any event of hospitalization irrespective of cause, NB. Outpatient treatment are usually excluded. Seeing a GP outside are also generally excluded.

QUOTE
2)What will happen if let say we never use the service and after maturity,what will happen to the money that we already paid.Is it will be refund or it consider 'hangus' as for hire purchase insurance.Paid every year but never claim it and next year paid a new one again.

A traditional Med Card, your premium is burned in the event you do not use the facilities. Med Card is to indemnify you, not for profiteering.

QUOTE
3)What is the pro and con if i only bought this medical insurance after retirement?

Assuming you retire at 55 y/o, the only drawback is that your premium will be much much higher compare to when you buy it when you are 25 y/o.

QUOTE
4)Any other good suggestion?i read the friend medical insurance policy but i don't understand it fully.is there any way i can find a simplified or summarize insurance policy in a layman term?

Do not confuse Med card with Critical Illness with PA. They are different tools for different purpose, just like a screwdriver is good for screwing screws, hammer is good for hammering nails and a cutter is good for cutting stuff. Although you will find them all classified as handyman's tool.

To have all round protection, you need all, just like if you are a handyman doing repairing job you need all the necessary tools.

As a general rule of thumb, 10x annual salary for med card, 3-5 xannual salary for CI & PA.

Disclosure: I am not an insurance agent, but I am a user of insurance.

QUOTE(P3nang)
The best way is meeting up a professional insurance representative to explain to you clearly by reviewing your existing policy.

That or hire a Financial Planner like I did and you can get quotes from so many different company whereas an agent are limited to two Life Insurance company.

Xuzen


chew_ronnie
post May 30 2009, 02:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(xuzen @ May 30 2009, 02:02 PM)
Medical Card covers your hospital bill only. There is usually a life time cap based on your premium. I read somewhere that your cap should be 10 times your current annual salary. MedCare covers any event of hospitalization irrespective of cause, NB. Outpatient treatment are usually excluded. Seeing a GP outside are also generally excluded.
A traditional Med Card, your premium is burned in the event you do not use the facilities. Med Card is to indemnify you, not for profiteering.
Assuming you retire at 55 y/o, the only drawback is that your premium will be much much higher compare to when you buy it when you are 25 y/o.
Do not confuse Med card with Critical Illness with PA. They are different tools for different purpose, just like a screwdriver is good for screwing screws, hammer is good for hammering nails and a cutter is good for cutting stuff. Although you will find them all classified as handyman's tool.

To have all round protection, you need all, just like if you are a handyman doing repairing job you need all the necessary tools.

As a general rule of thumb, 10x annual salary for med card, 3-5 xannual salary for CI & PA.

Disclosure: I am not an insurance agent, but I am a user of insurance.

QUOTE(P3nang)
The best way is meeting up a professional insurance representative to explain to you clearly by reviewing your existing policy.

That or hire a Financial Planner like I did and you can get quotes from so many different company whereas an agent are limited to two Life Insurance company.

Xuzen
*
thumbup.gif
p3nang
post May 30 2009, 03:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(xuzen @ May 30 2009, 02:02 PM)


QUOTE(P3nang)
The best way is meeting up a professional insurance representative to explain to you clearly by reviewing your existing policy.

That or hire a Financial Planner like I did and you can get quotes from so many different company whereas an agent are limited to two Life Insurance company.

Xuzen
*
Well, to be more accurate, is one life insurance company. So it is important for an agent to do research and provide best service to client rather than just selling.
numbertwo
post May 30 2009, 05:18 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(xuzen @ May 30 2009, 02:02 PM)
Assuming you retire at 55 y/o, the only drawback is that your premium will be much much higher compare to when you buy it when you are 25 y/o.

As a general rule of thumb, 10x annual salary for med card, 3-5 xannual salary for CI & PA.

Xuzen
*
Hi,

The way I look at this is , either you buy the extra medical coverage NOW or after 55, you got to pay the same kind of rate when you reach 55. It doesn't mean that the premium you pay now will stay when you reach 55, isnt the MC premium usually tier rated? yes ? no? So, this isn't really a drawback imo..

We should be looking at how much the company's insurance can cover us... If the company's medical policy covers you up to 500K, then fine & good enuf.. But if company is buying those say board room 100, annum 30K limit, lifetime 100K, x K(say less than 10-15K) only for kidney dialysis or cancer treatment.. .. -- Wouldn't you get worried and quickly go look for another medical policy to cover this up?? The drawback of not getting the EXTRA medical coverage now is chances of you folking out the outstanding unclaimable from your company medical policy is there to stay till you get another coverage... I hope I write with some sense here, else please comment.

About 10x annual salary... say now if i'm earning 100K pa, do I need a 1Mil medical policy??.. I don't quite get how this logic is derived. Earning more doesn't mean my medical bill will sore by 10X does it? But it looks like more applicable to CI - CI should be 10x annual salary , since ppl could have been living like a king when they are earning 100K a year, so one probably need that 1Mil for the family to continue with that sort of living standard.. That's my logic... could be totally wrong anyway.

rgrds

This post has been edited by numbertwo: May 30 2009, 05:20 PM
atake
post May 30 2009, 08:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
I think there is no limit for medical coverage provided by my company only there is a limited coverage as follows:

1)Room rate at RM120 per night.However, i can increase it every year up to RM300 per night if i want.This will deductible from my salary.
2)Can't claim for complicated dental treatment such as bridge, and dental surgery.

Otherwise,is ok.we have our one panel clinic and hospital to choose such as Ampang Puteri,Tawakal,Gleaneagles and etc.

I has been hospitalized before for accident and all the treatment has been covered by my company.So,should i buy medical insurance now or buy it after retirement.Even the premium is higher, long term i think i will still save compare start paying now .
numbertwo
post May 30 2009, 10:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


all medical policy has limited coverage,, the way you describe, i suspect that you company is covering your medical by ways of making payment to you directly and no policy is involved.. If not, do you know which insurance package is that??

If company is covering your full medical, why trouble yourself lol..just live and be happy, and making sure that you dono't leave this co..
chew_ronnie
post May 31 2009, 01:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(numbertwo @ May 30 2009, 05:18 PM)
Hi,

The way I look at this is , either you buy the extra medical coverage NOW or after 55,  you got to pay the same kind of rate when you reach 55.  It doesn't mean that the premium you pay now will stay when you reach 55, isnt the MC premium usually tier rated?  yes ? no?  So, this isn't really a drawback imo..

We should be looking at how much the company's insurance can cover us... If the company's medical policy covers you up to 500K, then fine & good enuf..  But if company is buying those say board room 100, annum 30K limit, lifetime 100K, x K(say less than 10-15K) only for kidney dialysis or cancer treatment.. .. -- Wouldn't you get worried and quickly go look for another medical policy to cover this up??   The drawback of not getting the EXTRA medical coverage now is chances of you folking out the outstanding unclaimable from your company medical policy is there to stay till you get another coverage...  I hope I write with some sense here, else please comment.

About 10x annual salary... say now if i'm earning 100K pa, do I need a 1Mil medical policy??.. I don't quite get how this logic is derived.  Earning more doesn't mean my medical bill will sore by 10X does it?  But it looks like more applicable to CI - CI should be 10x annual salary , since ppl could have been living like a king when they are earning 100K a year, so one probably need that 1Mil for the family to continue with that sort of living standard..  That's my logic... could be totally wrong anyway.

rgrds
*
You are absolutely right there. What is more important is the external medical card shud have outpatient cancer and kidney dialysis benefit to be as-charged basis coz company cards is like what you;ve mentioned above.


Added on May 31, 2009, 1:29 am
QUOTE(atake @ May 30 2009, 08:03 PM)
I think there is no limit for medical coverage provided by my company only there is a limited coverage as follows:

1)Room rate at RM120 per night.However, i can increase it every year up to RM300 per night if i want.This will deductible from my salary.
2)Can't claim for complicated dental treatment such as bridge, and dental surgery.

Otherwise,is ok.we have our one panel clinic and hospital to choose such as Ampang Puteri,Tawakal,Gleaneagles and etc.

I has been hospitalized before for accident and all the treatment has been covered by my company.So,should i buy medical insurance now or buy it after retirement.Even the premium is higher, long term i think i will still save compare start paying now .
*
Yes, you maybe right that u can save abit compared to buying now. But the point is, can you guarantee your health @ 55 is the same as you are now?

THink this over.

This post has been edited by chew_ronnie: May 31 2009, 01:29 AM
raul
post May 31 2009, 06:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,930 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



Hello, is GE going to increase for their new policy premium charge start 1/6/09?

c.o.o.l
post May 31 2009, 06:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(atake @ May 30 2009, 08:03 PM)
I think there is no limit for medical coverage provided by my company only there is a limited coverage as follows:

1)Room rate at RM120 per night.However, i can increase it every year up to RM300 per night if i want.This will deductible from my salary.
2)Can't claim for complicated dental treatment such as bridge, and dental surgery.

Otherwise,is ok.we have our one panel clinic and hospital to choose such as Ampang Puteri,Tawakal,Gleaneagles and etc.

I has been hospitalized before for accident and all the treatment has been covered by my company.So,should i buy medical insurance now or buy it after retirement.Even the premium is higher, long term i think i will still save compare start paying now .
*
You should ask yourself, why you want to buy insurance. It is for PROTECTION. If you think your company already given you that protection, you will not post here.
Try ask yourself:
- Will your company pay for all your bill when it is large amount.
- Will your company still hire you if you need to claim medical expenses repeatedly. (e.g. kidney dialysis, cancer treatment...).

If the above is Yes, then you can say that you have the protection before you retire. And you have to bear the risk not to get any illness that will affect you to get insurance after you retire.
mtsen
post May 31 2009, 07:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(xuzen @ May 30 2009, 02:02 PM)
Medical Card covers your hospital bill only. There is usually a life time cap based on your premium. I read somewhere that your cap should be 10 times your current annual salary. MedCare covers any event of hospitalization irrespective of cause, NB. Outpatient treatment are usually excluded. Seeing a GP outside are also generally excluded.
A traditional Med Card, your premium is burned in the event you do not use the facilities. Med Card is to indemnify you, not for profiteering.
Assuming you retire at 55 y/o, the only drawback is that your premium will be much much higher compare to when you buy it when you are 25 y/o.
Do not confuse Med card with Critical Illness with PA. They are different tools for different purpose, just like a screwdriver is good for screwing screws, hammer is good for hammering nails and a cutter is good for cutting stuff. Although you will find them all classified as handyman's tool.

To have all round protection, you need all, just like if you are a handyman doing repairing job you need all the necessary tools.

As a general rule of thumb, 10x annual salary for med card, 3-5 xannual salary for CI & PA.

Disclosure: I am not an insurance agent, but I am a user of insurance.

QUOTE(P3nang)
The best way is meeting up a professional insurance representative to explain to you clearly by reviewing your existing policy.

That or hire a Financial Planner like I did and you can get quotes from so many different company whereas an agent are limited to two Life Insurance company.

Xuzen
*
Thank you Xuzen, you are one of the very rare BEST 'user' insurance industry can find here biggrin.gif
idunnolol
post Jun 1 2009, 12:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Dear All
I have a bit of problem with my family insurance policy. When i was 13,my family bought me a medical insurance policy for critical illness and death for RM 420 per year. The payout is only 20k. Should i continue or change policy? I feel that 20k is not enough for CI as i work in the medical line and know that the private health care would cost at least 100k for CI
bbjslee
post Jun 1 2009, 12:20 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(idunnolol @ Jun 1 2009, 12:17 PM)
Dear All
I have a bit of problem with my family insurance policy. When i was 13,my family bought me a medical insurance policy for critical illness and death for RM 420 per year. The payout is only 20k. Should i continue or change policy? I feel that 20k is not enough for CI as i work in the medical line and know that the private health care would cost at least 100k for CI
*
Is it a Traditional Plan? Have you checked what is the current Sum Assured?
idunnolol
post Jun 1 2009, 01:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
it write there the sum insured 20k
Type of coverage Benefit
LPPOO 20k
CTPDB 20k

Any expert to guide me on this?
bbjslee
post Jun 1 2009, 01:43 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(idunnolol @ Jun 1 2009, 01:16 PM)
it write there the sum insured 20k
Type of coverage     Benefit
LPPOO                     20k
CTPDB                    20k

Any expert to guide me on this?
*
Engage another insurance agent to do a policy review for you.
Call up the customer service of the insurance company
Or you scan everything and post online here tongue.gif

This post has been edited by bbjslee: Jun 1 2009, 01:43 PM
numbertwo
post Jun 1 2009, 03:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


For those who gets company's insurance coverage with certain limit, you may consider looking up any top-up plan that has something calls "deductible" option. What this does is enables your company insurance to pay first, up till its limit, and claim the remaining from this top-up plan. I realised this kind of plan costs much lesser and it fits the purpose for those employed, like me. Any -ve comment about this type of plan?
chew_ronnie
post Jun 1 2009, 08:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jun 1 2009, 03:44 PM)
For those who gets company's insurance coverage with certain limit, you may consider looking up any top-up plan that has something calls "deductible" option.  What this does is enables your company insurance to pay first, up till its limit, and claim the remaining from this top-up plan.   I realised this kind of plan costs much lesser and it fits the purpose for those employed, like me.  Any -ve comment about this type of plan?
*
its good in a way its very cheap n wat u say is very true. The most important thing is to lookup for the outpatient cancer n kidney dialysis clause. if these 2 r fine, they u can go ahead with it.


Added on June 1, 2009, 8:21 pm
QUOTE(idunnolol @ Jun 1 2009, 01:16 PM)
it write there the sum insured 20k
Type of coverage     Benefit
LPPOO                     20k
CTPDB                    20k

Any expert to guide me on this?
*
It seems to me like a life policy of 20K or C.I 20K or TPD 20K whichever comes 1st. If i'm not mistaken, this is an Aetna policy. I may be wrong though.

This post has been edited by chew_ronnie: Jun 1 2009, 08:31 PM
p3nang
post Jun 1 2009, 09:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


how come so little?
idunnolol
post Jun 1 2009, 09:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(p3nang @ Jun 1 2009, 09:19 PM)
how come so little?
*
i have no idea, All i know is that i am suckered into such policy by some relative so pardon my bias view on insurance agent
cuebiz
post Jun 1 2009, 10:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
992 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(idunnolol @ Jun 1 2009, 09:35 PM)
i have no idea, All i know is that i am suckered into such policy by some relative  so pardon my bias view on insurance agent
*
Since you are working now, just buy a new CI policy. It wont cost too much premium since you are young.
idunnolol
post Jun 1 2009, 10:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
i have the idea too, problem is that my mom want me to continue it since she bought it from her cousin,thats why it is so complicated
p3nang
post Jun 2 2009, 12:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


Then you just continue it and buy extra policy that suits your need lo. Since the existing policy so low coverage won't cost much also. Your financial risk is more important to manage.
secretsquirrel
post Jun 2 2009, 10:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


What would you recommend a newly wed to buy, if they are:
- age >25
- no serious medical records
- u-grad
- no children yet
- rent a house
- both are working in government sections - stable but LOW income
- chinese.
chew_ronnie
post Jun 2 2009, 11:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 2 2009, 10:58 AM)
What would you recommend a newly wed to buy, if they are:
- age >25
- no serious medical records
- u-grad
- no children yet
- rent a house
- both are working in government sections - stable but LOW income
- chinese.
*
2 Individual ILP that links both names together, eg. if one is diagnosed with 36C.I then both policies shall be waived.

ILP can be structured in a way to include 36C.I, Life/TPD, Med Card and P.A together and the premium starts from RM100/mth (given its low premium for an all in one policy). Most important thing to note in ILP, is Please DO NOT look at the returns as those figures r just projected returns n it won't be high.

And when they have a child/s then they can add their child/s name together hence if the payors are diagnosed with 36C.I, eventually all policies shall be waived from premium. THis is a more complete protection solution.
secretsquirrel
post Jun 2 2009, 12:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


thanks chew but i have got to skipped all those abbrv. u used and r u representing any particular co?
chew_ronnie
post Jun 2 2009, 01:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 2 2009, 12:47 PM)
thanks chew but i have got to skipped all those abbrv. u used and r u representing any particular co?
*
My friend,

Sorry for those abbrv:
ILP = Investment Linked Policy
TPD = Total Permanent Disability
36C.I = 36 Critical Illnesses
Payor = Payer that pays for the policy.

I'm from Allianz Insurance.
bbbrights
post Jun 2 2009, 01:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Hello Buddies<

Actually pls do not make your self confused with so many plans. we should at least know what is the expenses for medical fees when we fall sick, accident or died. So let make it very easy, I have been doing insurance for years, lots of ppl r really confused with all these plans, plans, plans. Supposingly, we should have a complete coverage which includes Critical Illnesses, Life, Medical card and Personal Accident. If budg you should have budget problem, I advise to start with Critical Illnesses, Life and medical card.
Dun get too many oponions, it will only confuse you and lengthen your decision making process.
I am great eastern agent, feel free to call me
ERIC
012-2761980
ijustsmokeyou
post Jun 2 2009, 02:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
My advice is to find an agent that you can trust. You are entitled to find second opinions but don't be too bothered about the price, cos the products that you buy is worth every penny of it.
bigboy
post Jun 2 2009, 06:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
265 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



me just start to take insurance, at first yess i'm really confuse bout the plan, but when i'm read the policy and keep asking at my really good agent and my frend.. now i'm understand how important is insurance

currently i take p.a, life and life+saving (3 plans) and will take medical also.
c.o.o.l
post Jun 2 2009, 10:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Yes, insurance is important. But yet still got people who think insurance is bullshit. =.=
And for those who want to buy insurance, try to have the PROTECTION 1st before you think about those SAVING insurance.
secretsquirrel
post Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


@Thanks Ronnie, and All. So, why would one need insurance? For saving money purpose, why not just save into bank WITH STRONG WILL and gain interests or invest in some other ways than insurance? Dont try to beat me with ways of investment elsewhere, Im into finance.

The above case 1 of two young newly wed is my friend's, not me. Im trying to guide him what would work best for him. So, in short, why would one need insurance if
1) he doesnt care if he gets one of the 36C and died without money to try helping himself (protection)
2) he doesnt need it for investment

Does he still need it now?

Case 2 - I personally do not buy any insurance for anything, except for investment purpose, that i get certain % of return after certain years. Eg, $x will get y% of return after z years. If you have of these products, let me know.

@Eric
No im not going to call you now n would really like to get as much info from this thread as possible. But i like your post, it is interesting.

This post has been edited by secretsquirrel: Jun 3 2009, 09:47 AM
c.o.o.l
post Jun 3 2009, 10:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
@Thanks Ronnie, and All. So, why would one need insurance? For saving money purpose, why not just save into bank WITH STRONG WILL and gain interests or invest in some other ways than insurance? Dont try to beat me with ways of investment elsewhere, Im into finance.

The above case 1 of two young newly wed is my friend's, not me. Im trying to guide him what would work best for him.  So, in short, why would one need insurance if
1) he doesnt care if he gets one of the 36C and died without money to try helping himself (protection)
2) he doesnt need it for investment

Does he still need it now?

Case 2 - I personally do not buy any insurance for anything, except for investment purpose, that i get certain % of return after certain years. Eg, $x will get y% of return after z years.  If you have of these products, let me know.

@Eric
No im not going to call you now n would really like to get as much info from this thread as possible.  But i like your post, it is interesting.
*
For me, insurance is always for Protection, the return(investment/saving) is just an adds on to it.
Case 1:
1) He doesn't care?
- If he got the illness and not die, where he will get the money to pay for the bill? Government hospital? My wife is working in government too(so I got the free medical in goverment hospital - first class). I can say, if serious illness, you can go for government hospital. But if it is minor/medium illness, try to go privates. And for some cases, like kidney dialysis, you will need to take up queue that like will never come to you.
- Do your friends give their parents money? If they passed away, who will continue to support for their parents.
- What happened if they not working with government anymore?
2) Insurance is just another choice for investment/saving.

Case 2:
- Yes there is product of investment/saving. But most of it is for long term.
chew_ronnie
post Jun 3 2009, 10:46 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
@Thanks Ronnie, and All. So, why would one need insurance? For saving money purpose, why not just save into bank WITH STRONG WILL and gain interests or invest in some other ways than insurance? Dont try to beat me with ways of investment elsewhere, Im into finance.

The above case 1 of two young newly wed is my friend's, not me. Im trying to guide him what would work best for him.  So, in short, why would one need insurance if
1) he doesnt care if he gets one of the 36C and died without money to try helping himself (protection)
2) he doesnt need it for investment

Does he still need it now?

Case 2 - I personally do not buy any insurance for anything, except for investment purpose, that i get certain % of return after certain years. Eg, $x will get y% of return after z years.  If you have of these products, let me know.

@Eric
No im not going to call you now n would really like to get as much info from this thread as possible.  But i like your post, it is interesting.
*
Hi there,

Your statement is abit contradicting as you are looking for the best insurance (protection benefit) for ur friend coz u know he doesnt have any and if anything bad things happen, then the spouse will be in deep trouble. N what i'm proposing is on good for protection.

But on the other hand, you are saying u buy insurance just for the investment purpose. So what do u wanna bring out here, you are looking for a good investment type insurance for ur friend or a protection plan? Sorry for this and hope it wont offend u.

Case 2: All traditional insurance policies works the same, only the premium payment term which varies across companies. So basically all traditional policies are long term to get ur certain $x will get y% of return after z yrs. Generally u need at least a 18 yrs to see profits, the longer the better.

As for investment linked policies, if you wanna reap the profits (purely investment returns) I advice u go directly to mutual funds. Dont waste ur time in buying investment linked policies. Investment linked policies is only good if u want some coverage attached to it.
p3nang
post Jun 3 2009, 11:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
@Thanks Ronnie, and All. So, why would one need insurance? For saving money purpose, why not just save into bank WITH STRONG WILL and gain interests or invest in some other ways than insurance? Dont try to beat me with ways of investment elsewhere, Im into finance.

The above case 1 of two young newly wed is my friend's, not me. Im trying to guide him what would work best for him.  So, in short, why would one need insurance if
1) he doesnt care if he gets one of the 36C and died without money to try helping himself (protection)
2) he doesnt need it for investment

Does he still need it now?

Case 2 - I personally do not buy any insurance for anything, except for investment purpose, that i get certain % of return after certain years. Eg, $x will get y% of return after z years.  If you have of these products, let me know.

@Eric
No im not going to call you now n would really like to get as much info from this thread as possible.  But i like your post, it is interesting.
*
1) Buying insurance is not because someone is going to die, it is because somebody has to keep living.
(If the person die, how about those who depend on his income? If he no die, his medical expenses will give burden to others, so be responsible to himself/herself)
2) If doesn't need investment then just go ahead for pure insurance policy. We have plenty of options. Cheer !!!


Case 2 - Honestly, from the view of financial planner, you are reversing the proper way. No doubt insurance has its potential for you to invest and earn money, But protection is the main objective in insurance and should be the priority of everyone. Wealth accumulation will come after risk management in any financial planning.
secretsquirrel
post Jun 3 2009, 01:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


thanks all.

case 1, kids future is a good point. I will talk to him about it. They might not want any children afterall. I dont know.

case 2, only interested to quick money plans, eg, within 5 or 10yrs; simply see it as an alternatives than putting in normal bank acct.
numbertwo
post Jun 3 2009, 02:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


didn you say "why would one need insurance? For saving money purpose, why not just save into bank WITH STRONG WILL and gain interests or invest in some other ways than insurance? Dont try to beat me with ways of investment elsewhere, Im into finance." ?

for case 2, fyi, there are plenty of those 'saving' plans out there nowadays.. u pay xxxx sum a year for x year (usually not more than 10), and u get constant yearly returns after xx years..

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Jun 3 2009, 02:31 PM
chew_ronnie
post Jun 3 2009, 02:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 3 2009, 01:47 PM)
thanks all.

case 1, kids future is a good point. I will talk to him about it.  They might not want any children afterall. I dont know.

case 2, only interested to quick money plans, eg, within 5 or 10yrs; simply see it as an alternatives than putting in normal bank acct.
*
Case 2, majority of the insurance company has these plans. Mostly between 8 to 12 years. Pm me if u want a quote.
secretsquirrel
post Jun 3 2009, 02:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jun 3 2009, 02:29 PM)
didn you say "why would one need insurance? For saving money purpose, why not just save into bank WITH STRONG WILL and gain interests or invest in some other ways than insurance? Dont try to beat me with ways of investment elsewhere, Im into finance."  ?

for case 2, fyi, there are plenty of those 'saving' plans out there nowadays.. u pay xxxx sum a year for x year (usually not more than 10), and u get constant yearly returns after xx years..
*
ur first para - yes i did.

ur 2nd para - i know that already. so what are the constructive suggestions u have for me here?
numbertwo
post Jun 3 2009, 03:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 3 2009, 02:56 PM)
ur first para - yes i did.

ur 2nd para - i know that already. so what are the constructive suggestions u have for me here?
*
Well, i guess you got to wait for insurance agents to give you some real constructive solutions , not from me.

I'm actually with you on your point #1, i don't want to buy policy just for saving purposes.. hence, i have no suggestion on any good policy that give you point #2..
secretsquirrel
post Jun 4 2009, 09:50 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


numbertwo - i hope my idea do not stripe you from your original intention with insurance. Cos i might be having a difference case from you, with different bullets in different situation.

So, go back to your original idea/queries and start it from there. Before you pay for anything, u may send me a pm so we can discuss in further, this make us stand together in the line to 'defence' anyone who try to con us, if they would biggrin.gif (kidding)
numbertwo
post Jun 4 2009, 10:51 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


hehe...no worries secretsquirrel, i'm too poor to attract any conman for that matter.. biggrin.gif
secretsquirrel
post Jun 4 2009, 12:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


the poorer ones should get protection asap. Please dont shut off easily. U know ur own worries. Let's face it together.
chew_ronnie
post Jun 4 2009, 12:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(secretsquirrel @ Jun 4 2009, 12:38 PM)
the poorer ones should get protection asap.  Please dont shut off easily.  U know ur own worries. Let's face it together.
*
Even if one is not poor, from the average family, do get more protection 1st to protect your wealth else if one serious illness comes, it'll eat up a whole chunk of your investment.

Everyone think it over, investment dun have to come 1st, get all the protection needed then only invest to create wealth.
bbbrights
post Jun 5 2009, 12:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Protection, saving & Investment are 3 different things. One should always very clear with their purpose before any purchase. Insurance in 21st century,for me, is a must not an option.
Saving is about time, the longer period u save, the more u get. Anyway, chew_ronnie mentioned, many insurance com do not those plan which u would just need to commit 8 to 12 years, this is a good plan i would recommend.
cheers!!!!

ERIC 0122761980
Lion Of the Great Eastern
c.o.o.l
post Jun 11 2009, 08:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Prudential just launch of new product recently.
- Medical card with NCB, able to waive annual limit...
- Cover 36 illness up to 3 times claim
- Waiver for both husband and wife if something happen(education plan)

Many more....
numbertwo
post Jun 11 2009, 12:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


PRU medical card always attached to a life policy, isn't it?
c.o.o.l
post Jun 11 2009, 02:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Yup, it attach to ILP. New medical card plan is just a portion of new things. There is still others.
juicyjessy
post Jun 17 2009, 11:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


Hi, does anyone here is HLA medical holder? Any comments (good/bad)? I'm considering to buy HLA or Allianz but .......Pls give some of your experience....
Crazyallen
post Jun 17 2009, 12:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
81 posts

Joined: Jan 2008


Hi, as i know now GE medical card which combination with investment link 1 called Smart Medic offer the best medical card in town.
Here are some other important elements in medical coverage that you should concerned about when u buy medical card:
1) Pre-hospitalization and post-hospitalization claims.
2) Limit payable for outpatient treatment; for accident, cancer and kidney dialysis respectively.
3) Room & board and ICU maximum days of coverage.
4) Annual limit & lifetime limit.

GE smart medic Room150;
i)Hospital room & board ( maximum, up to 180days )
ii)ICU (Per day up to 180 days)
iii)Emergency Accident outpatient treatment ( maximum 30days from date of accident ) - RM3000/ annual.
iv)Overall annual limit - RM90000 ( Increase to the initial overall annual limit -RM9000 )
v)Lifetime limit - RM720000

So, can i know out there still got any medical card which offer better than GE?
Thx for sharing rclxms.gif



c.o.o.l
post Jun 17 2009, 01:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(juicyjessy @ Jun 17 2009, 11:16 AM)
Hi, does anyone here is HLA medical holder? Any comments (good/bad)? I'm considering to buy HLA or Allianz but .......Pls give some of your experience....
*
Would you like to consider for Prudential?

- ICU, outpatient cancer, outpatient kidney dialysis is as charge
- No claim bonus. Means if a year you did not make any claim, there will be bonus credit to your account.
- Can choose to waive annual limit
- Can choose to cover up to age 100.

If you are interested, give me a pm.


Added on June 17, 2009, 1:41 pm
QUOTE(Crazyallen @ Jun 17 2009, 12:31 PM)
Hi, as i know now GE medical card which combination with investment link 1 called Smart Medic offer the best medical card in town.
Here are some other important elements in medical coverage that you should concerned about when u buy medical card:
1) Pre-hospitalization and post-hospitalization claims.
2) Limit payable for outpatient treatment; for accident, cancer and kidney dialysis respectively.
3) Room & board and ICU maximum days of coverage.
4) Annual limit & lifetime limit.

GE smart medic Room150;
i)Hospital room & board ( maximum, up to 180days )
ii)ICU (Per day up to 180 days)
iii)Emergency Accident outpatient treatment ( maximum 30days from date of accident ) - RM3000/ annual.
iv)Overall annual limit - RM90000 ( Increase to the initial overall annual limit -RM9000 )
v)Lifetime limit - RM720000

So, can i know out there still got any medical card which offer better than GE?
Thx for sharing  rclxms.gif
*
As of what I know, GE medical card have limit on outpatient cancer treatment and kidney dialysis. Correct me if Im wrong.

There is no such company that offer the BEST medical card. Every company's medical card have its pros and cons. There will only have a medical card that BEST suits your needs.

This post has been edited by c.o.o.l: Jun 17 2009, 01:41 PM
juicyjessy
post Jun 17 2009, 05:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


[quote=c.o.o.l,Jun 17 2009, 01:38 PM]
Would you like to consider for Prudential?

- ICU, outpatient cancer, outpatient kidney dialysis is as charge
- No claim bonus. Means if a year you did not make any claim, there will be bonus credit to your account.
- Can choose to waive annual limit
- Can choose to cover up to age 100.

If you are interested, give me a pm.


Added on June 17, 2009, 1:41 pm

but that is co-insurance rite?
how much for age 25-30?
tinkerbel
post Jun 17 2009, 05:11 PM

Fanaddict!
Group Icon
VIP
13,495 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


@juicyjessy,
If U go with just the H+S plan under PMM5 RM300, u'll be looking at about RM200 p/month.
chew_ronnie
post Jun 17 2009, 05:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


[quote=juicyjessy,Jun 17 2009, 05:09 PM]
[quote=c.o.o.l,Jun 17 2009, 01:38 PM]
Would you like to consider for Prudential?

- ICU, outpatient cancer, outpatient kidney dialysis is as charge
- No claim bonus. Means if a year you did not make any claim, there will be bonus credit to your account.
- Can choose to waive annual limit
- Can choose to cover up to age 100.

If you are interested, give me a pm.


Added on June 17, 2009, 1:41 pm

but that is co-insurance rite?
how much for age 25-30?
*

[/quote]

HI everyone:

This is my summary
GE - Smart Medic The highest lifetime limit with the most number of days (180 days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause and the co-payment if exceed R&B charges up to no cap!
Pru - PMM5 annual limit and lifetime limit not as high as GE's smart medic (120days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause
Pru - PruHealth has the option to NCB and option up to age 80 or 100 and option to go for no annual limit cap- drawback - co-insurance clause higher than PMM5 (if i'm not mistaken), also the COI (cost of insurance is way higher than PMM5)
Allianz - Medicover annual limit and lifetime limit same as PMM5 (150 days on normal room and board/ disability), no-co-insurance - drawback - annual limit not so high as compared to GE's Smart Medic and PruHealth
HLA - No co-insurance, drawback - lifetime limit quite low at 3X
ING - same as HLA

These are the best cards running in the market at the moment - c which suits u most as these cards has outpatient cancer and kidney dialysis treatment are as-charged.

These cards are best bought with ILP and the cheapest package ILP with medical card rider, I would say it's Allianz. (Agents from other comp pls correct me if i'm wrong). Allianz can do RM150/mth for a RM300 room and board for ppl below 30 yrs.

Hope this can help u in choosing.

Rgds

This post has been edited by chew_ronnie: Jun 17 2009, 06:11 PM
p3nang
post Jun 17 2009, 08:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


Hi, ING adviser here ready for service. smile.gif
juicyjessy
post Jun 18 2009, 09:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 17 2009, 05:57 PM)
HI everyone:

This is my summary
GE - Smart Medic The highest lifetime limit with the most number of days (180 days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause and the co-payment if exceed R&B charges up to no cap!
Pru - PMM5 annual limit and lifetime limit not as high as GE's smart medic (120days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause
Pru - PruHealth has the option to NCB and option up to age 80 or 100 and option to go for no annual limit cap- drawback - co-insurance clause higher than PMM5 (if i'm not mistaken), also the COI (cost of insurance is way higher than PMM5)
Allianz - Medicover annual limit and lifetime limit same as PMM5 (150 days on normal room and board/ disability), no-co-insurance - drawback - annual limit not so high as compared to GE's Smart Medic and PruHealth
HLA - No co-insurance, drawback - lifetime limit quite low at 3X
ING - same as HLA

These are the best cards running in the market at the moment - c which suits u most as these cards has outpatient cancer and kidney dialysis treatment are as-charged.

These cards are best bought with ILP and the cheapest package ILP with medical card rider, I would say it's Allianz. (Agents from other comp pls correct me if i'm wrong). Allianz can do RM150/mth for a RM300 room and board for ppl below 30 yrs.

Hope this can help u in choosing.

Rgds
*
Hi, thanks for the above infor. It's usefull to all here.
I'm act considering of either HLA or Allianz only. The thing that i found out why HLA more expensive than others is some clause they have and others no. Some more their premium higher is maybe co-in alr added in since co-ins is bank negara rules. Finally, i'm still considering of HLA though it's expensive but i think its worth. However, the problem is i heard lots bad comments bout the claim procedure. Frens and agent's client also comments that HLA claim is very difficult and etc. So.....it's make me stuck.

This post has been edited by juicyjessy: Jun 18 2009, 09:21 AM
numbertwo
post Jun 18 2009, 09:44 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


You mentioned HLA is more expensive, you mentioned HLA has more clauses than others, and more so If claims is deemed to be that difficult, and you hear it from so many parties, you should just ignore them , period. You don't want to scream and yell and curse when it comes to claim, isn't it? It's clear cut to me. Why such a dilemma?
c.o.o.l
post Jun 18 2009, 10:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Since you think that HLA have so many problem. Why you still consider it as an option? Is there any superior benefits that HLA offering?
Comparing to HLA, will Allianz have the problem too? If not, then you already have the answer.
chew_ronnie
post Jun 18 2009, 01:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(juicyjessy @ Jun 18 2009, 09:21 AM)
Hi, thanks for the above infor. It's usefull to all here.
I'm act considering of either HLA or Allianz only. The thing that i found out why HLA more expensive than others is some clause they have and others no. Some more their premium higher is maybe co-in alr added in since co-ins is bank negara rules. Finally, i'm still considering of HLA though it's expensive but i think its worth. However, the problem is i heard lots bad comments bout the claim procedure. Frens and agent's client also comments that HLA claim is very difficult and etc. So.....it's make me stuck.
*
Its kind of weird u are mentioning the few drawbacks from HLA and you are still insist on HLA. SUPRISED! blink.gif Then just go ahead with Allianz la. I dun encounter any claims problem during these few years attached to Allianz, so if the premium is cheaper and no co-ins, i dun c y u cant just get Allianz. And btw, can you share what HLA clause is superior than other companies? We want to know. Thanks.
juicyjessy
post Jun 19 2009, 09:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


Act HLA and Allianz premium is not much diff. But HLA did have additional benefit as below:

i) Daily cash as a result of hospitality due to Road Accident at Highway (150) days.
ii) In Hospitality Physiotherapy Treatment
iii) Organt transplant which Allianz didnt mentioned on their schedule.
iv) Day surgery benefit
v) Emergency Accidental Outpatient Treatment (no limit) which Allianz did.
vi) Emergency Accidental Dental Treatment
vii) O/patient Physiotherapy treatment
viii) Emergency Evacuation Repatriation
x) Daily cash allowance. (Allianz did have but additional charges)

As for claim problem, just fren and agent told me that diff. So, i have no idea whether it's or not. So, just hope can get some comments here from the policy holder.


Added on June 19, 2009, 9:56 am
QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 18 2009, 01:48 PM)
Its kind of weird u are mentioning the few drawbacks from HLA and you are still insist on HLA. SUPRISED! blink.gif Then just go ahead with Allianz la. I dun encounter any claims problem during these few years attached to Allianz, so if the premium is cheaper and no co-ins, i dun c y u cant just get Allianz. And btw, can you share what HLA clause is superior than other companies? We want to know. Thanks.
*
Hi, thanks for the comment on Allianz.



This post has been edited by juicyjessy: Jun 19 2009, 10:09 AM
4lenAngel
post Jun 19 2009, 10:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
280 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Somewhere where Only I belong. Only ME!


QUOTE(atake @ May 30 2009, 08:03 PM)
I think there is no limit for medical coverage provided by my company only there is a limited coverage as follows:

1)Room rate at RM120 per night.However, i can increase it every year up to RM300 per night if i want.This will deductible from my salary.
2)Can't claim for complicated dental treatment such as bridge, and dental surgery.

Otherwise,is ok.we have our one panel clinic and hospital to choose such as Ampang Puteri,Tawakal,Gleaneagles and etc.

I has been hospitalized before for accident and all the treatment has been covered by my company.So,should i buy medical insurance now or buy it after retirement.Even the premium is higher, long term i think i will still save compare start paying now .
*
Bro Atake it would be wise of u if u get a insurance + medical policy..if u take prudential it comes with saving.. so when ur retiring u'll have some savings there as well..
Well now u have room for rm120 / night.. u can choose the rm300 room that moment.. and u pay for it and claim it back from prudential..and also u'll be entitled for admittance allowance and surgeries done. U should seek for for a prudential rep for further info.. Cheers!!
ChinHong86
post Jun 19 2009, 10:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,116 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: SP,KL


QUOTE(Crazyallen @ Jun 17 2009, 01:31 PM)
Hi, as i know now GE medical card which combination with investment link 1 called Smart Medic offer the best medical card in town.
Here are some other important elements in medical coverage that you should concerned about when u buy medical card:
1) Pre-hospitalization and post-hospitalization claims.
2) Limit payable for outpatient treatment; for accident, cancer and kidney dialysis respectively.
3) Room & board and ICU maximum days of coverage.
4) Annual limit & lifetime limit.

GE smart medic Room150;
i)Hospital room & board ( maximum, up to 180days )
ii)ICU (Per day up to 180 days)
iii)Emergency Accident outpatient treatment ( maximum 30days from date of accident ) - RM3000/ annual.
iv)Overall annual limit - RM90000 ( Increase to the initial overall annual limit -RM9000 )
v)Lifetime limit - RM720000

So, can i know out there still got any medical card which offer better than GE?
Thx for sharing  rclxms.gif
*
AIA provide a new medical card.. MCP + ECP 150
i) NO lifetime limit (1st and the only one in market)
ii) Guaranteed renewal till 100 years old

If TS is interested, we can set up an appointment...
you can contact me at 017-2917130
i am Darren Lim Chin Hong
Justin1000
post Jun 20 2009, 02:26 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(juicyjessy @ Jun 18 2009, 10:21 AM)
Hi, thanks for the above infor. It's usefull to all here.
I'm act considering of either HLA or Allianz only. The thing that i found out why HLA more expensive than others is some clause they have and others no. Some more their premium higher is maybe co-in alr added in since co-ins is bank negara rules. Finally, i'm still considering of HLA though it's expensive but i think its worth. However, the problem is i heard lots bad comments bout the claim procedure. Frens and agent's client also comments that HLA claim is very difficult and etc. So.....it's make me stuck.
*
Always remember, premium for medical card(Hospital & Surgical Insurance) is not guaranteed. Insurer can increase the premium with approval from the Regulator. As such you may buy low and premium can increase as and when the insurer is losing money. Look at it this way, you should not just look at low premium, also look at the insurer's track record how often and at what quantum they have been increasing the premium. If an insurer starts to simply pay claim liberally, chances are they will lose money and they have to increase the premium. No insurer will want to do a losing business.......
mtsen
post Jun 21 2009, 01:28 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(Justin1000 @ Jun 20 2009, 02:26 AM)
Always remember, premium for medical card(Hospital & Surgical Insurance) is not guaranteed. Insurer can increase the premium with approval from the Regulator. As such you may buy low and premium can increase as and when the insurer is losing money. Look at it this way, you should not just look at low premium, also look at the insurer's track record how often and at what quantum they have been increasing the premium. If an insurer starts to simply pay claim liberally, chances are they will lose money and they have to increase the premium. No insurer will want to do a losing business.......
*
No insurer wants to do a losing business but as far as medical statistic goes, different insurer has different perception on medical risk and it is POSSIBLE that one insurer under-estimate the risk and provide good deal on medical plan which later they stop the plan, in such case, it IS A GOOD DEAL if the consumer is able to sign up to such plan before they stop it.
Justin1000
post Jun 21 2009, 09:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(mtsen @ Jun 21 2009, 02:28 AM)
No insurer wants to do a losing business but as far as medical statistic goes, different insurer has different perception on medical risk and it is POSSIBLE that one insurer under-estimate the risk and provide good deal on medical plan which later they stop the plan, in such case, it IS A GOOD DEAL if the consumer is able to sign up to such plan before they stop it.
*
Many people assume the same way you assume, not knowing that as far as Hospitalisation and Surgical Insurance is concerned, even if you lock in early, no guarantee that your premium will not go up to a level that you cannot afford anymore. In which case, even the insurer continue to transact this portfolio, you may not be able to keep paying the high premium, unless of course you are in bad shape and continue to claim, otherwise for a healthy person, there would be no reason to continue by then. Again once that happens, more healthy people leave the portfolio leaving only the sick people who will continue to claim....insurers will continue to increase premium.....premium keep rising...finally even the sick people cannot sustain to continue paying premium..... so without having the insurer to withdraw, you may withdraw by yourself.... of course the insurers will try their very best to avoid this.....


p3nang
post Jun 21 2009, 11:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


But, have you guys ever think why the premium keep increasing?
It is because the inflation of medical cost. So if you cannot sustain the premium, how are you going to sustain the medical cost by yourself? smile.gif
Justin1000
post Jun 22 2009, 08:26 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(p3nang @ Jun 22 2009, 12:56 AM)
But, have you guys ever think why the premium keep increasing?
It is because the inflation of medical cost. So if you cannot sustain the premium, how are you going to sustain the medical cost by yourself? smile.gif
*
Medical inflation is just one of the factors contributing to premium hike. The others include abuse and misuse of medical cards while the insurers are competing with each other on whose card is the best by ease of claim (pay as many things as possible) with low premium. Simply because insurers know that they can increase the premium by hiding behind the buzz word of medical inflation. They do not have to explain how they manage their risk management. And their last resort would be just withdraw the product from the shelf. Though they cannot take away the policy from the existing policyholders, there is nothing to stop them fro increasing the premium...

Hospitalisation and surgical insurance is unlike Life policy, which once you lock in at a low premium it stays until the policy matures or expires. As such it is always good to buy when young for life policy as the premium is low and guaranteed(not changed except for term plan).

Having said that it is not that we cannot buy H&S insurance, it is just that we should not just go for the low premium, we should look at track records of the insurers in managing the premium hike, if they have been freely increasing their premium in the past frequently with high quantum, then one should think carefully. The other area would be the services etc....


numbertwo
post Jun 22 2009, 09:34 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(Justin1000 @ Jun 22 2009, 08:26 AM)

Having said that it is not that we cannot buy H&S insurance, it is just that we should not just go for the low premium, we should look at track records of the insurers in managing the premium hike, if they have been freely increasing their premium in the past frequently with high quantum, then one should think carefully. The other area would be the services etc....
*
Thanks for sharing, but how often can a general public like us get these kind of information, especially the details of their past history on the premium increment? As this is not made available to public, not even the agent knows (or would they tell the truth?) i guess, we can only look out for a few other criterias when it comes to comparing the medical card products, and premium is one of it. Another key criteria would be whether the product will have the guaranteed renewal term in it or not, something like they cannot reject, or will not increase the premium, or introduce new exclusions on renewals..And plan withdrawal or premium increase must be done on portfolio basis.. That's as far as I can go when it comes to choosing a MC..
mtsen
post Jun 22 2009, 09:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Just want to make it CLEAR that

should NOT go for LOW premium

DOES NOT EQUAL TO

should go for HIGH premium.

it is plain dump to pay more just because you dont want to pay less. If the features and the same, one should still go for lower premium - more value for money.

Which insurer are you referring to that charges high premium NOW and will NOT increase premium in future like the way you described ?


Added on June 22, 2009, 9:56 am
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jun 22 2009, 09:34 AM)
Thanks for sharing, but how often can a general public like us get these kind of information, especially the details of their past history on the premium increment?  As this is not made available to public, not even the agent knows (or would they tell the truth?) i guess, we can only look out for a few other criterias when it comes to comparing the medical card products, and premium is one of it.  Another key criteria would be whether the product will have  the guaranteed renewal term in it or not, something like they cannot reject, or will not increase the premium, or introduce new exclusions on renewals..And plan withdrawal or premium increase must be done on portfolio basis..  That's as far as I can go when it comes to choosing a MC..
*
these info are NOT hidden on purpose neither, just request these info, whoever can provide you the most transparent info may be the one you should adhere to ... thats if you care about transparency that much. if not, then it is you yourself who give out on finding this data, not because other ppl do not feed you.

This post has been edited by mtsen: Jun 22 2009, 09:56 AM
c.o.o.l
post Jun 22 2009, 11:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Some of the hospitals will be charging more expensive than normal price if you are paying with insurance. Thats one of the reason why medical expenses goes up. This happens especially when the medical card have no co-insurance.

So if you are paying medical bill with insurance, be sure to take up responsibility to question the hospital when the bill is unreasonable. Don't just think that as long as you no need to pay out then will be ok.
chew_ronnie
post Jun 22 2009, 12:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


It is not hard to get a medical card! Every company's med cards has their pros and cons, there is no one card is the best in the market. So actually it comes back to the benefits you are looking for, features such as guarantee renewable and co-insurance issues. These are the things that one shud look at rather than getting the cheapest or the most expensive. Most expensive may not equal the best!

All med cards in the market has this clause that says the premium is not guaranteed and subject to the companies claim profile and insurance companies will increase prior 90 days notice to policyholders. So if everyone is so worried about this clause, it means that M'sians SHOULD NOT buy medical cards? No way right, so get the cards that favours you the best, not the price.
juicyjessy
post Jun 22 2009, 03:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


finally has decided to take up HLA.
p3nang
post Jun 22 2009, 09:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


congratulation ! haha
Justin1000
post Jun 22 2009, 11:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 22 2009, 01:35 PM)
It is not hard to get a medical card! Every company's med cards has their pros and cons, there is no one card is the best in the market. So actually it comes back to the benefits you are looking for, features such as guarantee renewable and co-insurance issues. These are the things that one shud look at rather than getting the cheapest or the most expensive. Most expensive may not equal the best!

All med cards in the market has this clause that says the premium is not guaranteed and subject to the companies claim profile and insurance companies will increase prior 90 days notice to policyholders. So if everyone is so worried about this clause, it means that M'sians SHOULD NOT buy medical cards? No way right, so get the cards that favours you the best, not the price.
*
The point I was trying to make is, do not just look at low premium for it is not guaranteed unlike in Life policy(other than term insurance). Normally the insurers will have the record of their premium increase, it is not that difficult to get if the agent and insurer are transparent about it. The reason why people are not asking for it simply because they are not aware of this.



4lenAngel
post Jun 23 2009, 04:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
280 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Somewhere where Only I belong. Only ME!


I agree wz u Chew_Ronnie..
juicyjessy
post Jun 26 2009, 09:37 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Feb 23 2009, 06:13 PM)
Dear Xuzen,

I have a quote for you. Based on age 30 male non-smoker.

Investment Linked Policy - The cheapest given your budget.
Death Benefit - RM 100K
Total Permanent Disability - RM 100K
36 Critical Illness - RM 200K
important note: If diagnose with 36 Critical Illness, this account will pay RM 200K. Then later if Death occurs, the account will pay another RM 100K. So its RM 300K in total.

The premium, RM 150/mth - RM 1800/yr. This is no scam.

Call or contact me at 016 335 0044.
*
Hi, I'm interested on this plan too. Would like to check which company of this? Thanks.

By the way, anyone of here can advise whether Medical Insurance should put in ILP or traditional plan? Any comemnts?
Thank you.
c.o.o.l
post Jun 26 2009, 10:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(juicyjessy @ Jun 26 2009, 09:37 AM)
Hi, I'm interested on this plan too. Would like to check which company of this? Thanks.

By the way, anyone of here can advise whether Medical Insurance should put in ILP or traditional plan? Any comemnts?
Thank you.
*
I thought you have already taken up HLA policy?

juicyjessy
post Jun 26 2009, 02:04 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(c.o.o.l @ Jun 26 2009, 10:41 AM)
I thought you have already taken up HLA policy?
*
yea...i had decided HLA (traditional). but then will take up another ILP also. Still thinking where to put medical insurance (ILP or traditional).

Above is more suitable to my bf so wan to check also.
c.o.o.l
post Jun 26 2009, 03:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
OIC. If you need info on Prudential ILP just let me know.
chew_ronnie
post Jun 27 2009, 07:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(juicyjessy @ Jun 26 2009, 09:37 AM)
Hi, I'm interested on this plan too. Would like to check which company of this? Thanks.

By the way, anyone of here can advise whether Medical Insurance should put in ILP or traditional plan? Any comemnts?
Thank you.
*
Hi,

This is from Allianz.

There is always pros and cons for traditional policies and ILPs. So there is no 1 best plan. It all comes back to what benefits u want and whether the budget you have can get what u want or not. Put it simple - for younger ppl age less than 45, buying ILP is cheaper than buying traditional life policy given that u want the same coverage. But the drawback in ILP is u may face to add extra premium when the fund is not enough to cover the cost of insurance. On the other hand, traditional policies (whole life NOT term) gives you some returns at the end of the day and its considered quite safe. So you choose which suits u better.
juicyjessy
post Jun 29 2009, 09:46 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 27 2009, 07:53 PM)
Hi,

This is from Allianz.

There is always pros and cons for traditional policies and ILPs. So there is no 1 best plan. It all comes back to what benefits u want and whether the budget you have can get what u want or not. Put it simple - for younger ppl age less than 45, buying ILP is cheaper than buying traditional life policy given that u want the same coverage. But the drawback in ILP is u may face to add extra premium when the fund is not enough to cover the cost of insurance. On the other hand, traditional policies (whole life NOT term) gives you some returns at the end of the day and its considered quite safe. So you choose which suits u better.
*
Hi, thanks for your comments. Above is noted as well.
Finally, we bought ILP and traditional both. Hope we choose and plan the rite thing.
numbertwo
post Jun 29 2009, 04:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 27 2009, 07:53 PM)
Hi,

This is from Allianz.

There is always pros and cons for traditional policies and ILPs. So there is no 1 best plan. It all comes back to what benefits u want and whether the budget you have can get what u want or not. Put it simple - for younger ppl age less than 45, buying ILP is cheaper than buying traditional life policy given that u want the same coverage. But the drawback in ILP is u may face to add extra premium when the fund is not enough to cover the cost of insurance. On the other hand, traditional policies (whole life NOT term) gives you some returns at the end of the day and its considered quite safe. So you choose which suits u better.
*
Hi Ronnie,
sorry i beg to differ.. "Put it simple - for younger ppl age less than 45, buying ILP is cheaper ".
As far as I am aware, ILP is for those age 0 - 35 or 36 (dunno the exact age).. After this band , the cost of insurance (as you rightly stated) will jump every year and that's when one's policy may suffer from possibility of extra premium to cover the charges..
If one buys from ie. age 40, you will see the cost of insurance jumps double, triple, quadxxxxx within the next 10 years.. This was what my agent told me, he had illustrated the cost of insurance to me too so that's how i came to know abt it..

chew_ronnie
post Jun 30 2009, 01:26 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jun 29 2009, 04:22 PM)
Hi Ronnie,
sorry i beg to differ..  "Put it simple - for younger ppl age less than 45, buying ILP is cheaper ". 
As far as I am aware, ILP is for those age 0 - 35 or 36 (dunno the exact age).. After this band , the cost of insurance (as you rightly stated) will jump every year and that's when one's policy may suffer from possibility of extra premium to cover the charges..
If one buys from ie. age 40, you will see the cost of insurance jumps double, triple, quadxxxxx within the next 10 years..    This was what my agent told me, he had illustrated the cost of insurance to me too so that's how i came to know abt it..
*
Hi good point here. For ILP's if u really look at the insurance charges, it's actually increasing every year, the only difference is the how much percentage it will leap.

Actually i've did a comparison for 1 of my client at age 43-44, he bought a term life 100k + 36C.I rider 100k, the premium for term is even more higher than a ILP and ofcoz ur concern up there where u need to pay extra premium to cover the changes will happen in the later years say at year 25 and above. So i just told him that is better of getting an ILP since its cheaper and just add some premiums when the time comes.

Also a point to note in ILP is what kind of riders u put in. Critical illness rider is the most expensive after age 40, followed by med card. So basically if u pump in alot of C.I and med benefit, these 2 will eat up alot of cost of insurance.

So there is no right or wrong la. just the customer likes what plan and I'll be very open to them.
malaunz
post Jul 4 2009, 07:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya


when taking an insurance, consider the plan carefully. actually, the basic life insurance is all the same which cover the 3 major risk

1. Death benefits
2. 36/40 critical illness
3. accident/disablement

so the different is in the medical card. how u want the medical card cover u? here's some condition u should consider,

1. don't look at the lifetime limit, look for annual limit. no matter if ur lifetime limit is 600k, but ur annual limit is just 20k, it didn't enough. even a "bisol" could cost almost 5k..

2. look the medical card plan carefully, is it hv any other limit besides the annual limit? even if u hv an annual limit of 60k, but there's limit on operation of 36k, limit on dialysis of 30k, it also didn't enough. one dialysis cost RM500 & need to do at least 2 times a week. u do the math urself.

3. ask the agent whether the medical card need to be renew or not? some medical card need to be renew early or maybe 5 year. u think for urself, if somedays, maybe after 5-6 years of renewing, u get an illness that cost about 50k. do you think the insurance company would let u renew? if u can renew, the previous illness will be excluded from ur benefits.

4. every time u want to renew the medical card, the price won't be the same again.

5. every medical card that need to be renew are term insurance & hv burn money policy.


Nuzul Azwan
Prudential/Prudential-BSN Takaful (JB/KL)
mdnuzulazwan(@)prupartner.com.my
Gen-X
post Jul 4 2009, 09:40 AM

Lifetime LYN Member
Group Icon
Elite
8,601 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL

QUOTE(malaunz @ Jul 4 2009, 07:55 AM)
when taking an insurance, consider the plan carefully. actually, the basic life insurance is all the same which cover the 3 major risk

1. Death benefits
2. 36/40 critical illness
3. accident/disablement

so the different is in the medical card. how u want the medical card cover u? here's some condition u should consider,

1. don't look at the lifetime limit, look for annual limit. no matter if ur lifetime limit is 600k, but ur annual limit is just 20k, it didn't enough. even a "bisol" could cost almost 5k..

2. look the medical card plan carefully, is it hv any other limit besides the annual limit? even if u hv an annual limit of 60k, but there's limit on operation of 36k, limit on dialysis of 30k, it also didn't enough. one dialysis cost RM500 & need to do at least 2 times a week. u do the math urself.

3. ask the agent whether the medical card need to be renew or not? some medical card need to be renew early or maybe 5 year. u think for urself, if somedays, maybe after 5-6 years of renewing, u get an illness that cost about 50k. do you think the insurance company would let u renew? if u can renew, the previous illness will be excluded from ur benefits.

4. every time u want to renew the medical card, the price won't be the same again.

5. every medical card that need to be renew are term insurance & hv burn money policy.
*
Above good advice for those looking for med card. Better to get policy that does not require renewal.

I want to add

1) ask if the policy is co-assured.
2) what about medicine cost.
3) policy up to what age. Nowadays can get up to 80 years.
4) limits for dialysis do consider, best is none but of course subject to annual limit.
5) if you have a family and on tight budget, ask them for family medical plan. AIA has it because one of my collegue was hospitalized and he told me took family med plan.

For those looking at Med Card, ask every agent from different companies to proposed to you minimum 3 different plans (even agents from the same company can give you 5 different plans for the same budget). If they don't want and only propose to you 1 plan, find another agent.



Justin1000
post Jul 4 2009, 10:36 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 30 2009, 02:26 AM)
Hi good point here. For ILP's if u really look at the insurance charges, it's actually increasing every year, the only difference is the how much percentage it will leap.

Actually i've did a comparison for 1 of my client at age 43-44, he bought a term life 100k + 36C.I rider 100k, the premium for term is even more higher than a ILP and ofcoz ur concern up there where u need to pay extra premium to cover the changes will happen in the later years say at year 25 and above. So i just told him that is better of getting an ILP since its cheaper and just add some premiums when the time comes.

Also a point to note in ILP is what kind of riders u put in. Critical illness rider is the most expensive after age 40, followed by med card. So basically if u pump in alot of C.I and med benefit, these 2 will eat up alot of cost of insurance.

So there is no right or wrong la. just the customer likes what plan and I'll be very open to them.
*
Always remember, whether it is ILP or otherwise, it is your money. The return you get from ILP is your money, the only difference is that instead of keeping your money to grow elsewhere, you are now keeping in the ILP.
Also remember, medical premium is not guaranteed and subject to change and is age sensitive. This is because medical inflation will set in year after year and is always much higher than the normal inflation.


lousai
post Jul 4 2009, 03:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
95 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


after reading all thread, here by i need advice on my insurance coverage:

My Profile:
Age: 33
Sex : Male
Smokng : No
Health : Okie n no operation yet since born
Budget : For 36CI only from 100-150.

Currently:
Company Group Insurance from ING
- Medical cap at annual 50K
- If Death 26x monthly salary
- Almost cover all cost of hospitalization as long as does not exceed the annual cap
- Note: It does not cover CI at all.

P.A
- 300K for self and Family, Rm550 Per year

Endowment
- RM52K for Death
- Current value is 30K

Child 1
- Medical Card, ILP type RM100 per month
- With Payer Rider

Child 2
- Endownment RM30K
- With Payer Rider

If you can see, i am definately lacking of 36CI coverage and life too. Have being approaching GE/AIA/PRU/Allianz agent, all of them provided me with the quote. Actaully too many quote that i am "blur' now.

Below is couple of question i have:
- Is it better to have 36CI as standalone or as rider in Life Policy(ILP or Whole Life)?
- My family is currently insured by company group insurance, yearly rm 300++ with the above coverage, should i
get a additional medical card for my family now or later if i resign..?
- Some agent told me 36CI with term policy , does not give you return but Whole life non-par did? The former is
definately cheaper as no return, and later will give you back what you paid plus minor interest.
- Pru Multiple Crisis offer 2x claim on 36CI, what do you guy think of this one.

Insurance Agent: Pls dun advice me on getting life policy as i am looking into CI/Medical Card only. No offend yea!

Thx doh.gif
Justin1000
post Jul 4 2009, 10:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(lousai @ Jul 4 2009, 04:01 PM)
after reading all thread, here by i need advice on my insurance coverage:

My Profile:
Age: 33
Sex : Male
Smokng : No
Health : Okie n no operation yet since born
Budget : For 36CI only from 100-150.

Currently:
Company Group Insurance from ING
- Medical cap at annual 50K
- If Death 26x monthly salary
- Almost cover all cost of hospitalization as long as does not exceed the annual cap
- Note: It does not cover CI at all.

P.A
- 300K for self and Family, Rm550 Per year

Endowment
- RM52K for Death
- Current value is 30K

Child 1
- Medical Card, ILP type RM100 per month
- With Payer Rider

Child 2
- Endownment RM30K
- With Payer Rider

If you can see, i am definately lacking of 36CI coverage and life too. Have being approaching GE/AIA/PRU/Allianz agent, all of them provided me with the quote. Actaully too many quote that i am "blur' now.

Below is couple of question i have:
- Is it better to have 36CI as standalone or as rider in Life Policy(ILP or Whole Life)?
- My family is currently insured by company group insurance, yearly rm 300++ with the above coverage, should i
  get a additional medical card for my family now or later if i resign..?
- Some agent told me 36CI with term policy , does not give you return but Whole life non-par did? The former is 
  definately cheaper as no return, and later will give you back what you paid plus minor interest.
- Pru Multiple Crisis offer 2x claim on 36CI, what do you guy think of this one.

Insurance Agent: Pls dun advice me on getting life policy as i am looking into CI/Medical Card only. No offend yea!

Thx doh.gif
*


My advice to you is to look at your budget. Medical insurance is a non participating insurance and has no return.
Primarily medical insurance is designed to provide fund for medical treatment when one is inflicted by illness; while the CI is designed for catastrophic illness where one is incapacitated.
The primarily objective is to get as much cover as possible within one's budget, and should there be an additional fund/budget, then only one should think of return by incorporating a saving feature in the life insurance in the form of a conventional insurance or ILP.
The difference between a conventional insurance (endowment or whole life etc) and ILP is that the former, the insurer is taking the risk on guaranteeing the return, while the in the case ILP, the insured/yourself is taking the risk on the return. In the olden days, investment return has been good for insurers, as such they can guarantee return of quite a good rate, however this is no more possible now. Even in the bank, they are asking you to invest in fund as they cannot guarantee you good rates anymore/

The old Chinese saying says, the wool of the sheep come from the sheep, i.e. whatever return that you are hoping comes from the additional premium that you have to fork out first, on top of the protection premium that you apy.

In conclusion, look at you need of coverage and the budget, understand and ensure that the cover match with your needs, good trusting agent and etc.
Always remember, insurer has actuarial to calculate, every bit of benefit that is covered, there is a price for it.

malaunz
post Jul 5 2009, 01:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(lousai @ Jul 4 2009, 03:01 PM)
after reading all thread, here by i need advice on my insurance coverage:

My Profile:
Age: 33
Sex : Male
Smokng : No
Health : Okie n no operation yet since born
Budget : For 36CI only from 100-150.

Currently:
Company Group Insurance from ING
- Medical cap at annual 50K
- If Death 26x monthly salary
- Almost cover all cost of hospitalization as long as does not exceed the annual cap
- Note: It does not cover CI at all.

P.A
- 300K for self and Family, Rm550 Per year

Endowment
- RM52K for Death
- Current value is 30K

Child 1
- Medical Card, ILP type RM100 per month
- With Payer Rider

Child 2
- Endownment RM30K
- With Payer Rider

If you can see, i am definately lacking of 36CI coverage and life too. Have being approaching GE/AIA/PRU/Allianz agent, all of them provided me with the quote. Actaully too many quote that i am "blur' now.

Below is couple of question i have:
- Is it better to have 36CI as standalone or as rider in Life Policy(ILP or Whole Life)?
- My family is currently insured by company group insurance, yearly rm 300++ with the above coverage, should i
  get a additional medical card for my family now or later if i resign..?
- Some agent told me 36CI with term policy , does not give you return but Whole life non-par did? The former is 
  definately cheaper as no return, and later will give you back what you paid plus minor interest.
- Pru Multiple Crisis offer 2x claim on 36CI, what do you guy think of this one.

Insurance Agent: Pls dun advice me on getting life policy as i am looking into CI/Medical Card only. No offend yea!

Thx doh.gif
*
36 CI benefits is just only a sum amount of money u'll get if u are confirmed by the doc that u have this kind of illness. but then, it won't cover ur medical bills. the bills will be deducted from ur medical card & u already hv medical card from ur company.. but if u still want it, i don't think there'll be a standalone policy on 36 CI. the most basic insurance plan should have:

1. death benefit
2. 36 CI
3. Acc/disablement.

So by reading all ur coverage, it should be enough for your family with ur current protection. but u should be thinking the future when u won't be able to work anymore because of disablement (maybe accident or stroke), by that time, there won't be any coverage from ur company on medical card.


Nuzul Azwan
Prudential Assurance Malaysia Berhad

ChinHong86
post Jul 5 2009, 03:00 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,116 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: SP,KL


QUOTE(lousai @ Jul 4 2009, 04:01 PM)
after reading all thread, here by i need advice on my insurance coverage:

My Profile:
Age: 33
Sex : Male
Smokng : No
Health : Okie n no operation yet since born
Budget : For 36CI only from 100-150.

Currently:
Company Group Insurance from ING
- Medical cap at annual 50K
- If Death 26x monthly salary
- Almost cover all cost of hospitalization as long as does not exceed the annual cap
- Note: It does not cover CI at all.

P.A
- 300K for self and Family, Rm550 Per year

Endowment
- RM52K for Death
- Current value is 30K

Child 1
- Medical Card, ILP type RM100 per month
- With Payer Rider

Child 2
- Endownment RM30K
- With Payer Rider

If you can see, i am definately lacking of 36CI coverage and life too. Have being approaching GE/AIA/PRU/Allianz agent, all of them provided me with the quote. Actaully too many quote that i am "blur' now.

Below is couple of question i have:
- Is it better to have 36CI as standalone or as rider in Life Policy(ILP or Whole Life)?
- My family is currently insured by company group insurance, yearly rm 300++ with the above coverage, should i
  get a additional medical card for my family now or later if i resign..?
- Some agent told me 36CI with term policy , does not give you return but Whole life non-par did? The former is  
  definately cheaper as no return, and later will give you back what you paid plus minor interest.
- Pru Multiple Crisis offer 2x claim on 36CI, what do you guy think of this one.

Insurance Agent: Pls dun advice me on getting life policy as i am looking into CI/Medical Card only. No offend yea!

Thx doh.gif
*
annual premium: RM2100
ILP with medical card R&B 150
guaranteed renewal till age 100
waiver premium
annual limit : RM90k
lifetime limit: unlimited

Darren Lim
AIA Financial Consultant

This post has been edited by ChinHong86: Jul 5 2009, 03:25 PM
p3nang
post Jul 5 2009, 03:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(lousai @ Jul 4 2009, 03:01 PM)
after reading all thread, here by i need advice on my insurance coverage:

My Profile:
Age: 33
Sex : Male
Smokng : No
Health : Okie n no operation yet since born
Budget : For 36CI only from 100-150.

Currently:
Company Group Insurance from ING
- Medical cap at annual 50K
- If Death 26x monthly salary
- Almost cover all cost of hospitalization as long as does not exceed the annual cap
- Note: It does not cover CI at all.

P.A
- 300K for self and Family, Rm550 Per year

Endowment
- RM52K for Death
- Current value is 30K

Child 1
- Medical Card, ILP type RM100 per month
- With Payer Rider

Child 2
- Endownment RM30K
- With Payer Rider

If you can see, i am definately lacking of 36CI coverage and life too. Have being approaching GE/AIA/PRU/Allianz agent, all of them provided me with the quote. Actaully too many quote that i am "blur' now.

Below is couple of question i have:
- Is it better to have 36CI as standalone or as rider in Life Policy(ILP or Whole Life)?
- My family is currently insured by company group insurance, yearly rm 300++ with the above coverage, should i
  get a additional medical card for my family now or later if i resign..?
- Some agent told me 36CI with term policy , does not give you return but Whole life non-par did? The former is 
  definately cheaper as no return, and later will give you back what you paid plus minor interest.
- Pru Multiple Crisis offer 2x claim on 36CI, what do you guy think of this one.

Insurance Agent: Pls dun advice me on getting life policy as i am looking into CI/Medical Card only. No offend yea!

Thx doh.gif
*
Hi, I am Denny from ING.
Below are my suggestion:
- Sum assured 75k for CI coverage, Monthly premium RM130.86 with survivor benefit.

It is advisable for you to add up a medical since it is possible for you to resign, and nobody will know whether are you still insurable for medical coverage at that time.
- Annual limit 100k
- Lifetime limit 300k
- R&B 180
- No co-insurance needed
- monthly premium RM 66.06

At the same time, medical coverage for your family(non company group) are advised to be taken now and the reason is same as yours. smile.gif

Thank you.
c.o.o.l
post Jul 6 2009, 11:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(lousai @ Jul 4 2009, 03:01 PM)
after reading all thread, here by i need advice on my insurance coverage:

My Profile:
Age: 33
Sex : Male
Smokng : No
Health : Okie n no operation yet since born
Budget : For 36CI only from 100-150.

Currently:
Company Group Insurance from ING
- Medical cap at annual 50K
- If Death 26x monthly salary
- Almost cover all cost of hospitalization as long as does not exceed the annual cap
- Note: It does not cover CI at all.

P.A
- 300K for self and Family, Rm550 Per year

Endowment
- RM52K for Death
- Current value is 30K

Child 1
- Medical Card, ILP type RM100 per month
- With Payer Rider

Child 2
- Endownment RM30K
- With Payer Rider

If you can see, i am definately lacking of 36CI coverage and life too. Have being approaching GE/AIA/PRU/Allianz agent, all of them provided me with the quote. Actaully too many quote that i am "blur' now.

Below is couple of question i have:
- Is it better to have 36CI as standalone or as rider in Life Policy(ILP or Whole Life)?
- My family is currently insured by company group insurance, yearly rm 300++ with the above coverage, should i
  get a additional medical card for my family now or later if i resign..?
- Some agent told me 36CI with term policy , does not give you return but Whole life non-par did? The former is 
  definately cheaper as no return, and later will give you back what you paid plus minor interest.
- Pru Multiple Crisis offer 2x claim on 36CI, what do you guy think of this one.

Insurance Agent: Pls dun advice me on getting life policy as i am looking into CI/Medical Card only. No offend yea!

Thx doh.gif
*
To answer your questions:
- So far I didnt see any standalone 36CI, do you mean term?
- Depends on your budget. Also, if you did not get a separate medical card, you need to bear the risk.
- Yes, the additional premium you paid is to let you "get back" the money.
- Prudential now having new Multiple Crisis Protection. Which cover up to 3 times 36CI. This is more suitable for young people as the premium is cheaper and survival rate after 36CI is higher.
Pros:
- Cover up to 3 times

Cons:
- More expensive than normal 1
- Only can up to age 80(Normal is age 100)

If you need to have more information on Prudential product, please let me know. I can assured you to have all the freedom to choose what you want and what you really needs.
My hp num: 012-6090090
shunic
post Jul 12 2009, 04:48 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 17 2009, 05:57 PM)
HI everyone:

This is my summary
GE - Smart Medic The highest lifetime limit with the most number of days (180 days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause and the co-payment if exceed R&B charges up to no cap!
Pru - PMM5 annual limit and lifetime limit not as high as GE's smart medic (120days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause
Pru - PruHealth has the option to NCB and option up to age 80 or 100 and option to go for no annual limit cap- drawback - co-insurance clause higher than PMM5 (if i'm not mistaken), also the COI (cost of insurance is way higher than PMM5)
Allianz - Medicover annual limit and lifetime limit same as PMM5 (150 days on normal room and board/ disability), no-co-insurance - drawback - annual limit not so high as compared to GE's Smart Medic and PruHealth
HLA - No co-insurance, drawback - lifetime limit quite low at 3X
ING - same as HLA

These are the best cards running in the market at the moment - c which suits u most as these cards has outpatient cancer and kidney dialysis treatment are as-charged.

These cards are best bought with ILP and the cheapest package ILP with medical card rider, I would say it's Allianz. (Agents from other comp pls correct me if i'm wrong). Allianz can do RM150/mth for a RM300 room and board for ppl below 30 yrs.

Hope this can help u in choosing.

Rgds
*
Hi Ronnie,

I have some questions regarding Allianz products and have send you a pm. Can you please help me clarify those queries? Thanks.
chew_ronnie
post Jul 12 2009, 10:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(shunic @ Jul 12 2009, 04:48 PM)
Hi Ronnie,

I have some questions regarding Allianz products and have send you a pm. Can you please help me clarify those queries? Thanks.
*
Hi I've replied. Thanks
shunic
post Jul 13 2009, 01:31 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jul 12 2009, 10:57 PM)
Hi I've replied. Thanks
*
Pm'ed you. Thanks
burberrygal
post Jul 13 2009, 10:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Land Below the Wind


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 17 2009, 05:57 PM)
HI everyone:

This is my summary
GE - Smart Medic The highest lifetime limit with the most number of days (180 days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause and the co-payment if exceed R&B charges up to no cap!
Pru - PMM5 annual limit and lifetime limit not as high as GE's smart medic (120days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause
Pru - PruHealth has the option to NCB and option up to age 80 or 100 and option to go for no annual limit cap- drawback - co-insurance clause higher than PMM5 (if i'm not mistaken), also the COI (cost of insurance is way higher than PMM5)
Allianz - Medicover annual limit and lifetime limit same as PMM5 (150 days on normal room and board/ disability), no-co-insurance - drawback - annual limit not so high as compared to GE's Smart Medic and PruHealth
HLA - No co-insurance, drawback - lifetime limit quite low at 3X
ING - same as HLA

These are the best cards running in the market at the moment - c which suits u most as these cards has outpatient cancer and kidney dialysis treatment are as-charged.

These cards are best bought with ILP and the cheapest package ILP with medical card rider, I would say it's Allianz. (Agents from other comp pls correct me if i'm wrong). Allianz can do RM150/mth for a RM300 room and board for ppl below 30 yrs.

Hope this can help u in choosing.

Rgds
*
Hi Ronnie

I think u must be left out one Insurance company.
Manulife URL: http://www.manulife.com.my

Manulife
- There is unlimited Board and rooms and currently only the insurance company have the great coverage.
- Coverage up to 100 years old no matter female or male
- High individual annual limit
- Continuance of medical coverage after Total and Permanent Disability claims
- we have range or outpatient benefit which is cover top 3 med: strokes, kidney and cancer.

and etc more.... rclxms.gif

If you have any enquries, pls PM me ya wink.gif

LightEnchanter
post Jul 13 2009, 12:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
336 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(burberrygal @ Jul 13 2009, 10:51 AM)
Hi Ronnie

I think u must be left out one Insurance company.
Manulife URL: http://www.manulife.com.my

Manulife
- There is unlimited Board and rooms and currently only the insurance company have the great coverage.
- Coverage up to 100 years old no matter female or male
- High individual annual limit
- Continuance of medical coverage after Total and Permanent Disability claims
- we have range or outpatient benefit which is cover top 3 med: strokes, kidney and cancer.

and etc more....  rclxms.gif

If you have any enquries, pls PM me ya wink.gif
*
mind elaborate more on Continuance of medical coverage after Total and Permanent Disability claims? Renewal is guaranteed or wat? Any changes on the premium after that?


Added on July 13, 2009, 12:44 pmcan anyone kind to send me pamphlet/brochure screen shots on ur medical plan ?
another question, can i just buy the medical standalone only?

This post has been edited by LightEnchanter: Jul 13 2009, 01:12 PM
burberrygal
post Jul 13 2009, 07:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Land Below the Wind


QUOTE(LightEnchanter @ Jul 13 2009, 12:43 PM)
mind elaborate more on Continuance of medical coverage after Total and Permanent Disability claims? Renewal is guaranteed or wat? Any changes on the premium after that?


Added on July 13, 2009, 12:44 pmcan anyone kind to send me pamphlet/brochure screen shots on ur medical plan ?
another question, can i just buy the medical standalone only?
*
Hi for most of the "general insurance", they will add a clause called "invited renewal" which they might not allow the policy owner to renew their policy. In life insurance, as long as the sum assured is not fully claim. Then, the policy is renewable.

So, even after TPD claim, the medical coverage is still sustainable if the policy is not fully claim.

LightEnchanter, you can sign up for your standalone medical card for the medical coverage. However, that's some disadvantages which I might need to share with you. Please PM me your email address and your personal info for further discussion on this matter. I'll mail you the brochure after you PM me your email address.
ChinHong86
post Jul 14 2009, 12:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,116 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: SP,KL


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 17 2009, 06:57 PM)
HI everyone:

This is my summary
GE - Smart Medic The highest lifetime limit with the most number of days (180 days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause and the co-payment if exceed R&B charges up to no cap!
Pru - PMM5 annual limit and lifetime limit not as high as GE's smart medic (120days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause
Pru - PruHealth has the option to NCB and option up to age 80 or 100 and option to go for no annual limit cap- drawback - co-insurance clause higher than PMM5 (if i'm not mistaken), also the COI (cost of insurance is way higher than PMM5)
Allianz - Medicover annual limit and lifetime limit same as PMM5 (150 days on normal room and board/ disability), no-co-insurance - drawback - annual limit not so high as compared to GE's Smart Medic and PruHealth
HLA - No co-insurance, drawback - lifetime limit quite low at 3X
ING - same as HLA

These are the best cards running in the market at the moment - c which suits u most as these cards has outpatient cancer and kidney dialysis treatment are as-charged.

These cards are best bought with ILP and the cheapest package ILP with medical card rider, I would say it's Allianz. (Agents from other comp pls correct me if i'm wrong). Allianz can do RM150/mth for a RM300 room and board for ppl below 30 yrs.

Hope this can help u in choosing.

Rgds
*
Ronnie bro,
u left out AIA,
mana boleh...
lol...

AIA R&B 150
annual limit RM90k
unlimited lifetime claim
guaranteed renewal till age 100
120 days per policy year
got co-insurance free amount of RM22k
max Rm3k
gary_cts
post Jul 14 2009, 12:38 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


Hi All,

I looking at insurance plan for my son who is coming to 3 month old. Kind of cover of hospitalization/surgical. Some advised me to buy

1. A Life insurance & add on to cover the hospitalization/surgical & 36 critical illnesses.

2. A education plan plus add ons

3. An investment link insurance.

Don't really know which one is the best for my son as I myself are not well versed in surance products.

As for me, I thought of looking up a coverage for myself. Currently I have an endowment plan taken long time ago paying RM10++.00 p.a. coverage of RM20k. As now I am already coming to 40 of age, a smoker, a diabetic & high blood pressure patient, it's quite a problem to get me insured. Even though there is a chance, maybe I need to pay a higher premium and those related health problem that I have now will not be included in the coverage. Is it true?

Need guidance & advise from the experts here.

Tq

PJusa
post Jul 14 2009, 09:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi,

may i suggest you seperate the insurances? if you want medical cover, buy medical cover only. this will be a lot cheaper. for a very high cover, i believe AXA offers the highest limit (500k annually, no life-time limit). your kid will most likely be limited in choice by the plan you already have.

if you save yourself instead of getting the eduplan (buy bonds/investment fonds) then you save the policy overhead and the fat agent comission. why throw money out of the window? just buying the insurance will again minimize comission to the agent and thus maximise your money wink.gif

investment-link insurances are a waste of money in my opinion. they sell uncessary insurances and waste by means of comissions. also you should always find an agent to split comission with or go direct. the savings are huge.
ChinHong86
post Jul 14 2009, 10:08 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,116 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: SP,KL


QUOTE(gary_cts @ Jul 14 2009, 01:38 AM)
Hi All,

I looking at insurance plan for my son who is coming to 3 month old. Kind of cover of hospitalization/surgical. Some advised me to buy

1. A Life insurance & add on to cover the hospitalization/surgical & 36 critical illnesses.

2. A education plan plus add ons

3. An investment link insurance.

Don't really know which one is the best for my son as I myself are not well versed in surance products.

As for me, I thought of looking up a coverage for myself. Currently I have an endowment plan taken long time ago paying RM10++.00 p.a. coverage of RM20k. As now I am already coming to 40 of age, a smoker, a diabetic & high blood pressure patient, it's quite a problem to get me insured. Even though there is a chance, maybe I need to pay a higher premium and those related health problem that I have now will not be included in the coverage. Is it true?

Need guidance & advise from the experts here.

Tq
*
Bro,
I am an AIA agent,
i think it is best that we set an appointment to meet outside,
so that we can discuss this in detail,
pls contact me @ 017-2917130 or pm me ur contact number
to let you know in advance,
our company's medical card provide guaranteed coverage till age 100 & unlimited lifetime coverage with annual limits,
as far as i know, we are the only company providing this type of medical card.
chew_ronnie
post Jul 14 2009, 10:38 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(gary_cts @ Jul 14 2009, 12:38 AM)
Hi All,

I looking at insurance plan for my son who is coming to 3 month old. Kind of cover of hospitalization/surgical. Some advised me to buy

1. A Life insurance & add on to cover the hospitalization/surgical & 36 critical illnesses.

2. A education plan plus add ons

3. An investment link insurance.

Don't really know which one is the best for my son as I myself are not well versed in surance products.

As for me, I thought of looking up a coverage for myself. Currently I have an endowment plan taken long time ago paying RM10++.00 p.a. coverage of RM20k. As now I am already coming to 40 of age, a smoker, a diabetic & high blood pressure patient, it's quite a problem to get me insured. Even though there is a chance, maybe I need to pay a higher premium and those related health problem that I have now will not be included in the coverage. Is it true?

Need guidance & advise from the experts here.

Tq
*
Hi my friend,

For your 3 mth old kid - it actually depends on what kind of protection you want and the budget you are able to afford and also the features. It actually doesnt matter what type of policy u get.

For hospitalisation - its best to linked it with an investment linked policy because of the lower Cost of Insurance so basically meaning that its premiums are quite cheap. Also do get at least a RM300 room and board for a child plan i.e. normally children are very prone to infection desease of the ear nose eye and throat so normally the child will be normally put in a single room (to seperate the illness to spread to other kids) and a single room in the hosp now is around Rm250 to RM270/nite.

If you would like to save some edu funds for your child - then get another separate endownment plan or the more popular 8 to 12 years saving plans from various companies. By doing this you will not mix up everything together - protection is protection and savings is savings.

For your case, would like to know how serious is your diabetic and ur hypertension level. Diabetic is a more serious issue here. So do let me know what is ur condition. I'm attached to Allianz and I have several cases of hypertension and all are accepted with loading.

You are free to pm me if you have queries. Thanks,
Ronnie


PJusa
post Jul 14 2009, 11:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
ChinHong86,

what is the annual limit? if the annual limit is low (i.e. below 300k) the coverage wont suffice for any serious illness. so it would be required to top-this up with a life-time limit / deductible policy to be prepared for serious illness.

chew_ronnie,

i believe it very much matters what policy you take. for a small kid its easy to get accepted so it makes sense to choose a policy with guarenteed renewal to cover for future sickness which would otherwise impose a loading or outright refusal to insure (see the dad's case of diabetic and hypertension). i would not consider any plan that does not offer some sort of guaranteed renewal.

i would like to hear why you think that an investment linked policy leads to lower premiums? if you look at the overall costs of the insurance they will be significantly higher and providing a lower coverage than a stand-alone policy. if you want to invest money, invest it seperately - this provides much greater flexibility and higher profits imho.

btw: i am not an agent so i wont push for any particular plan wink.gif i just did a research through all available medical plans not too long ago to cover my own family.

gary_cts: to give you some sort of direction. please provide a budget you are willing to spend on the various types of insurance. no use suggesting a plan that cost you 1000++ if your budget is only 200++ p.a. for medical insurance.


Added on July 14, 2009, 11:25 amon an unrelated matter: I am looking for an agent for Tokio Marine to split comission for renewal of Medic Plus Family plan. No work for you just a quick renewal. Plan is used as top-up for AXA so you most likely will never have any work besides the renewal. If anyone is willing to split comission please message me and i let you place the policy in your account. current premium aroun 700 RM only cause we are young. we intend to keep the plan for long term though so the comission will pile up - it's free money wink.gif

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 14 2009, 11:25 AM
chew_ronnie
post Jul 14 2009, 12:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 14 2009, 11:21 AM)
ChinHong86,

what is the annual limit? if the annual limit is low (i.e. below 300k) the coverage wont suffice for any serious illness. so it would be required to top-this up with a life-time limit / deductible policy to be prepared for serious illness.

chew_ronnie,

i believe it very much matters what policy you take. for a small kid its easy to get accepted so it makes sense to choose a policy with guarenteed renewal to cover for future sickness which would otherwise impose a loading or outright refusal to insure (see the dad's case of diabetic and hypertension). i would not consider any plan that does not offer some sort of guaranteed renewal.

i would like to hear why you think that an investment linked policy leads to lower premiums? if you look at the overall costs of the insurance they will be significantly higher and providing a lower coverage than a stand-alone policy. if you want to invest money, invest it seperately - this provides much greater flexibility and higher profits imho.

btw: i am not an agent so i wont push for any particular plan wink.gif i just did a research through all available medical plans not too long ago to cover my own family.

gary_cts: to give you some sort of direction. please provide a budget you are willing to spend on the various types of insurance. no use suggesting a plan that cost you 1000++ if your budget is only 200++ p.a. for medical insurance.


Added on July 14, 2009, 11:25 amon an unrelated matter: I am looking for an agent for Tokio Marine to split comission for renewal of Medic Plus Family plan. No work for you just a quick renewal. Plan is used as top-up for AXA so you most likely will never have any work besides the renewal. If anyone is willing to split comission please message me and i let you place the policy in your account. current premium aroun 700 RM only cause we are young. we intend to keep the plan for long term though so the comission will pile up - it's free money wink.gif
*
Hi PJUsa,

Of coz buying a med plan has to be guaranteed renewable and what i'm saying is guaranteed renewable.

There are a few reasons for me to say buying a med card rider in investment link. 1st - if you actually compare side by side(rider only) the cost of insurance is relatively lower than standalone(although the total price might be higher but dun forget you'll get a life portion as well meaning it will generate some cash value - not to earn / profit but its a buffer for a policy holder incase they dont have money, you can out it on premium holiday so that the med benefit will not lapse). 2nd - Comparing major standalone plans in market - most of them do not have outpatient cancer treatment and kidney dialysis as charged. To me how big the lifetime limit it doesnt matter - the most important still comes back to these treatments.

On investment issue - i totally agree with you. There are better invest options out there. ILP is good in way that you spend less money to get the protection you want - not to reap profits from it.


burberrygal
post Jul 14 2009, 12:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Land Below the Wind


QUOTE(gary_cts @ Jul 14 2009, 12:38 AM)
Hi All,

I looking at insurance plan for my son who is coming to 3 month old. Kind of cover of hospitalization/surgical. Some advised me to buy

1. A Life insurance & add on to cover the hospitalization/surgical & 36 critical illnesses.

2. A education plan plus add ons

3. An investment link insurance.

Don't really know which one is the best for my son as I myself are not well versed in surance products.

As for me, I thought of looking up a coverage for myself. Currently I have an endowment plan taken long time ago paying RM10++.00 p.a. coverage of RM20k. As now I am already coming to 40 of age, a smoker, a diabetic & high blood pressure patient, it's quite a problem to get me insured. Even though there is a chance, maybe I need to pay a higher premium and those related health problem that I have now will not be included in the coverage. Is it true?

Need guidance & advise from the experts here.

Tq
*
For your information, a person had diabetic & high blood pressure, can buy a policy but based on their health condition...
i can says Manulife still can accept..but have to try..come to premium, for sure have to pay extra. In biz view, no company wanted to do biz with high risk.

--> for a newborn baby, i strongly recommended a investment link policy with protection plan.. which means a package plan...

The reason of it, coz now days lots of people worries financial crisis, investment link is a best plan.. if they hv extra money then only save in education plan.. Intergen is a very good plan to act as education planning...

Gary, am i answers all ur question..? blush.gif

PJusa
post Jul 14 2009, 01:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi chew_ronnie,

i appreciate your reply. i agree with you outpatient cancer/dialysis is critically important. for this very reason we have two plans (AXA 500k annual limit per head + Tokio Marine (10k deductable) to provide an extra 750k lifetime coverage on outpatient cancer/dialysis.

if you look at the mere rider cost the cost to cover 1 RM might be cheaper. but i am not sure if this is really the case. first of all it might be very hard to caugh up the funds required to cover 500k of medical fees. i am not sure what i would have to buy - maybe you can provide an example for this so we can compare a similar coverage. a lower coverage doesnt help that much with a really severe sickness afterall. this is the main problem with linked policies - the annual limit is often just not enough. it's actually cheaper to combine two policies - at least that is how it looks to me.

but the investment-linked rider medical policy does have major disadvantages to me: it's binding a lot of capital. to keep my medical cover i must maintain the insurance. i.e. once i have decided i am locked-in. the same would apply to some degree to a plain-vanilla medical insurance but it only locks me in with respect to health-care. i can add additional plans if i see fit and my investments are independant from the medical cover. this seems like a very important thing to me.

with respect to your premium buffer: i can also save the money i dont spend with the expensive rider attached life policy (bonds/fonds/whatever) and if i cant come up with the premium use those savings. again: total flexibility. this is what we do - we have a monthly budget for healthcare - the savings are placed in conservative investments to reduce the higher premiums in the future.
in that way the investment-link policy provides little benefit if any.

the only issue that still remains is that stand-alone policies usually only cover until 80 at the moment. hopefully this will change very soon as it's most needed when we are even older. but for now what can we do? the Great Eastern Policy that covers until 100 years of age has such a meager limit that it makes no sense to take it up early - you just eat up your allowance and the premiums are so high that you have a greater benefit if you save the policy premiums in government bonds wink.gif

looking forward to discuss this further with you!
mtsen
post Jul 14 2009, 04:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


don't buy insurance until your kid is 6 years old, you cann't fully claim anyway.

focus on your own, make sure insurance is abundant if you cann't take care of your family and your young kid. for the kid, focus on giving her the best in everything including health food, injection, family doctor etc.

if really want to 'save' for the kid, use mutual fund or other form of investment, you have 5-6 years of time horizon. by then stop your investment and buy the insurance if you still want to ...

no, investment link is not an appropriate for this case.

sorry fellow insurance agents, but you can focus on the adult and ask him to use all his budget in his own plans, one for himself and another investment link on his name but for the kid ....
PJusa
post Jul 14 2009, 04:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen, why would you say no med insurance required until 6 years? of course i can fully claim any costs under a stand alone medical plan within the limits of the policy. please enlighten me what plan you cant fully claim under? certainly not any of the ones i am using for my daughter - i did read the TOS to the dot and it's my business to do contracts wink.gif
chew_ronnie
post Jul 15 2009, 11:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 14 2009, 01:37 PM)
hi chew_ronnie,

i appreciate your reply. i agree with you outpatient cancer/dialysis is critically important. for this very reason we have two plans (AXA 500k annual limit per head + Tokio Marine (10k deductable) to provide an extra 750k lifetime coverage on outpatient cancer/dialysis.

if you look at the mere rider cost the cost to cover 1 RM might be cheaper. but i am not sure if this is really the case. first of all it might be very hard to caugh up the funds required to cover 500k of medical fees. i am not sure what i would have to buy - maybe you can provide an example for this so we can compare a similar coverage. a lower coverage doesnt help that much with a really severe sickness afterall. this is the main problem with linked policies - the annual limit is often just not enough. it's actually cheaper to combine two policies - at least that is how it looks to me.

but the investment-linked rider medical policy does have major disadvantages to me: it's binding a lot of capital. to keep my medical cover i must maintain the insurance. i.e. once i have decided i am locked-in. the same would apply to some degree to a plain-vanilla medical insurance but it only locks me in with respect to health-care. i can add additional plans if i see fit and my investments are independant from the medical cover. this seems like a very important thing to me.

with respect to your premium buffer: i can also save the money i dont spend with the expensive rider attached life policy (bonds/fonds/whatever) and if i cant come up with the premium use those savings. again: total flexibility. this is what we do - we have a monthly budget for healthcare - the savings are placed in conservative investments to reduce the higher premiums in the future.
in that way the investment-link policy provides little benefit if any.

the only issue that still remains is that stand-alone policies usually only cover until 80 at the moment. hopefully this will change very soon as it's most needed when we are even older. but for now what can we do? the Great Eastern Policy that covers until 100 years of age has such a meager limit that it makes no sense to take it up early - you just eat up your allowance and the premiums are so high that you have a greater benefit if you save the policy premiums in government bonds wink.gif

looking forward to discuss this further with you!
*
There are always pros and cons with each type of policy be it ILP or whole life or stand alone cards. What you say is true and you got your point there and if that suits you well then you don't need to consider other options. Its best to get 2 medical cards together.

As i'm aware some of the standalone cards especially from those offered by General Ins Co are not guarantee renewable. So this one of my biggest concern but if there are guaranteed renewable then no harm getting.

Buying insurance doesn't mean that there is 1 best choice - it depends on ones choice. Coz basically we are just sharing each others view. There is no right or wrong.


Added on July 15, 2009, 12:01 pm
QUOTE(mtsen @ Jul 14 2009, 04:17 PM)
don't buy insurance until your kid is 6 years old, you cann't fully claim anyway.

focus on your own, make sure insurance is abundant if you cann't take care of your family and your young kid.  for the kid, focus on giving her the best in everything including health food, injection, family doctor etc.

if really want to 'save' for the kid, use mutual fund or other form of investment, you have 5-6 years of time horizon.  by then stop your investment and buy the insurance if you still want to ...

no, investment link is not an appropriate for this case.

sorry fellow insurance agents, but you can focus on the adult and ask him to use all his budget in his own plans, one for himself and another investment link on his name but for the kid ....
*
mtsen,

I totally disagree with you. Can you guarantee to say that a kid between 0 to 6 yrs are not prone to illnesses? I doubt any1 can guarantee (but dont be offended cos this is for the sake of discussion)

For medical card purpose - yes you can claim full just like an adult. What CANNOT claim full shall be the Death and Critical Illness Benefit where it follows the LIEN rule 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and only in the 6th year 100% claimable.

So my advice is for child medical insurance - get a med card without Critical Illness.

And the other issue is I'm not asking someone to save using investment linked policy, but just saying that an investment linked policy can be used to inlcude a medical card.

Again above is only my point of view - NO right or NO wrongs.

Bro - dont be offended ok!

This post has been edited by chew_ronnie: Jul 15 2009, 12:01 PM
PJusa
post Jul 15 2009, 01:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
chew_ronnie,

i agree there is one-fits-all solution. i guess this also very much depends on your healthcare budget. if you cant afford the old-age premium it's no use taking a high coverage plan. sadly malaysia does not provide a uniform coverage as in europe where the insurers compete by price and additional benefits (rehab, private room etc).

i can understand your remarks and i can accept them. but i feel that seperating insurances and not bundling them allows you for better flexibility. say i buy a med+crit.ill.+ILP with death and TPD - if i need to change any one of those components i am first of bound by the offers of one company only (cant get the best deals anymore) and i am more often than not stuck with what i have. cancelling such combi products is often accompanied by a big loss. that is why i like to split the insurances and the investments and this is also why i dont combine med.insurance with death and TPD. it's just easier - i can assess the policies annually and switch where it seems necessary. also you can easily plan for old age - i wont need death and TPD coverage to the same degree i need it now in 30 years. i might only need TPD after all smile.gif

with respect to your advice for guranteed renewable plan: this is essential! i absolutely agree - never ever take a policy whose renewal is up to the company. you will regret it if major claims happen. also make sure there will never be personal loading after you have been accepted. anything less is not worth the paper the wording is printed on.

and i appreciate your comments on the med.ins. for kids - i totally agree. dont confuse death and crit.ill. with a medical insurance - those are different things alltogether and they do cover different risks.

personally i dont have critical illness cover since we deem the med. costs will be covered by the insurance. of course the lump sum might be used to cover for the fact that you cant work and as such makes sense if you are employed. if you have assets to dispose (i.e. a business or the like) it might be viable to continue the business with an extra employee so you can get payments from this or you might be able to sell it and get a lump sum payment this way.

but it reminds me that i still need to get crit. ill. cover for my daughter - despite the lien rule wink.gif
chew_ronnie
post Jul 15 2009, 01:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 15 2009, 01:00 PM)
chew_ronnie,

i agree there is one-fits-all solution. i guess this also very much depends on your healthcare budget. if you cant afford the old-age premium it's no use taking a high coverage plan. sadly malaysia does not provide a uniform coverage as in europe where the insurers compete by price and additional benefits (rehab, private room etc).

i can understand your remarks and i can accept them. but i feel that seperating insurances and not bundling them allows you for better flexibility. say i buy a med+crit.ill.+ILP with death and TPD - if i need to change any one of those components i am first of bound by the offers of one company only (cant get the best deals anymore) and i am more often than not stuck with what i have. cancelling such combi products is often accompanied by a big loss. that is why i like to split the insurances and the investments and this is also why i dont combine med.insurance with death and TPD. it's just easier - i can assess the policies annually and switch where it seems necessary. also you can easily plan for old age - i wont need death and TPD coverage to the same degree i need it now in 30 years. i might only need TPD after all smile.gif

with respect to your advice for guranteed renewable plan: this is essential! i absolutely agree - never ever take a policy whose renewal is up to the company. you will regret it if major claims happen. also make sure there will never be personal loading after you have been accepted. anything less is not worth the paper the wording is printed on.

and i appreciate your comments on the med.ins. for kids - i totally agree. dont confuse death and crit.ill. with a medical insurance - those are different things alltogether and they do cover different risks.

personally i dont have critical illness cover since we deem the med. costs will be covered by the insurance. of course the lump sum might be used to cover for the fact that you cant work and as such makes sense if you are employed. if you have assets to dispose (i.e. a business or the like) it might be viable to continue the business with an extra employee so you can get payments from this or you might be able to sell it and get a lump sum payment this way.

but it reminds me that i still need to get crit. ill. cover for my daughter - despite the lien rule wink.gif
*
PJusa,

Thanks for the positive feedback. THERE IS NO 1 BEST INSURANCE in the Market - what matters is what you want and what you actually need (to all forummers).

Want to give me a try for quote for your daughters critical illness. You can pm me.

Thanks.


numbertwo
post Jul 15 2009, 01:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


PJusa ,
From your postings I suppose you know more about how medical card works than some agents, who don't even know how 'deductible' option works. So bravo to you.

On the other site note, any reason why you think 36CI is 'mandatory' to form part of your insurance coverage? I've been reading the policy contracts and all these 36CI coverage sounds to me that one could very well be in 'half dead' situation before he/she can claim from the 36CI.

I start to think that it is totally unnecessary to get 36CI coverage. A good medical coverage would just do fine - as you mentioned..
PJusa
post Jul 15 2009, 03:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

i am not sure i know all that much. i just did some research and formed an opinion. i hope i right (or close to it) but i will most likely only find out if i really need the medical insurance. hopefully i wont have to find out though.

i didnt say CI is mandatory. actually i believe it has nothing to do with the issue of medical insurance at all. the medical insurance should be chosen such that i will also pay for the required medical costs that arise from any critical illness (not just the 36 you can buy extra insurance for). this of course does not hold for AIDS since no insurance company in malaysia covers this through a medical card. but that is alltogether a different issue.

why is CI usefull? if you do have one of those 36 CIs - say a severe stroke - you might find yourself in a position that you can no longer work. if you are employed and you were looking at another 30 years of hard labour then you are in trouble. this is where a cleverly chosen CI insurance can help you by paying a lumpsum that closes the gap between your working life and retirement. as such the coverage should be enough for an instant retirement. to allow for this, it has to very very high at young age and then gradually go down to zero coverage at age 65 or whatever age you want to retire. this way you can effectively cover (most) of the risk of getting so sick that you will not be able to work. death and tpd usually only cover accidents and not sickness so CI has a use there.

i hope i did make sense - this is at least why i think CI makes sense. for my daughter i would probably want a cover of rm 2,000,000 - how high ould the premium be for that chew_ronnie? she is currently 17 months. i will compare this internationally - there are insurance companies that cover the risk of not beeing able to work anymore (and nothing else) even if you are not residing in their country (look for german, uk and irish insurances targeted at expats) and the cover is cheap. i believe for my kid and rm 1,000,000 my quote was a mere 60 EUR annual premium.

feel free to discuss this further smile.gif
numbertwo
post Jul 15 2009, 05:10 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


PJusa,
Tks for sharing,
36CI in M'sia has some sort 'exclusion' in each of the coverage so do take note before you sign the dotted line.. ie. kidney failures - it has to be 'irreversible failure' on both kidneys, not just one; Same goes to blindness, both eyes must go; cancer, stage 2 or above(evidence of malignancy), and skin cancer is excluded.. blablabla.

I can accept that a high coverage for a working adults with young family members, but what's the rationale behind that you need such a high coverage too for a 17-mth? Care to share pls.

Tks.
PJusa
post Jul 15 2009, 05:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

i am aware of the limitations to the local policies. which is why i dont have a CI insurance from a malaysian insurance and neither does my wife. we do have a special insurance from a german company called "Berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung". this one covers you in case you are unable to return to work for whatever reason. very usefull.

i will most likely be getting this for my daughter too.

the idea behind the high coverage for a young kid is the exact same as for a young family. i would like her to be able to take of herself and not being in the position that i have to take of her.

for your information: for a monthly payment of EUR 1400 (RM 7000) until age of 65, the premium is around 650 EUR (RM 3250) for a 33 yr old male p.a. - as long as the degree of beeing unable to work is at or above 50% full payment will be made to you. this is very usefull - for lower monthly payments, the premium would be a lot lower. you pay roughly 50 EUR p.a. for every 100 EUR of monthly payment required.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 15 2009, 06:04 PM
chew_ronnie
post Jul 15 2009, 05:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 15 2009, 03:48 PM)
numbertwo,

i am not sure i know all that much. i just did some research and formed an opinion. i hope i right (or close to it) but i will most likely only find out if i really need the medical insurance. hopefully i wont have to find out though.

i didnt say CI is mandatory. actually i believe it has nothing to do with the issue of medical insurance at all. the medical insurance should be chosen such that i will also pay for the required medical costs that arise from any critical illness (not just the 36 you can buy extra insurance for). this of course does not hold for AIDS since no insurance company in malaysia covers this through a medical card. but that is alltogether a different issue.

why is CI usefull? if you do have one of those 36 CIs - say a severe stroke - you might find yourself in a position that you can no longer work. if you are employed and you were looking at another 30 years of hard labour then you are in trouble. this is where a cleverly chosen CI insurance can help you by paying a lumpsum that closes the gap between your working life and retirement. as such the coverage should be enough for an instant retirement. to allow for this, it has to very very high at young age and then gradually go down to zero coverage at age 65 or whatever age you want to retire. this way you can effectively cover (most) of the risk of getting so sick that you will not be able to work. death and tpd usually only cover accidents and not sickness so CI has a use there.

i hope i did make sense - this is at least why i think CI makes sense. for my daughter i would probably want a cover of rm 2,000,000 - how high ould the premium be for that chew_ronnie? she is currently 17 months. i will compare this internationally - there are insurance companies that cover the risk of not beeing able to work anymore (and nothing else) even if you are not residing in their country (look for german, uk and irish insurances targeted at expats) and the cover is cheap. i believe for my kid and rm 1,000,000 my quote was a mere 60 EUR annual premium.

feel free to discuss this further smile.gif
*
PJusa,

I totally make sense for you put it that way. A C.I plan actually provides additional income when one is diagnosed with those no cure / hard cure sickness that may take you hald your life strugglin and when this happens it will actually eat up every single penny from your retirement fund!

What you mentioned Rm1M for 60EU is fantastically cheap. I want that too. There is no way a M'sian C.I policy can match.

Allianz can only offer RM750K max for this age at RM3760/annum and subject to full med checkup. Thats it.

So go get the policy at 60EU!
PJusa
post Jul 15 2009, 06:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
chew_ronnie,

certain CI in europe are indeed very very cheap. i guess this also has to do with a different risk assesment. as you can see the premium for a all-round protection in case you are unable to work costs 10x the premium. this is largely due to the fact that also cases such as accidents and any and all deseases are covered. the only thing that matters is you cant work and all that is needed is a doctor to certify it (unless your claim is fishy - but that will always stir an investigation anywhere).

the allianz offer is very costly for just a CI insurance. nothing attached to the policy?

premium alone would total up to 236k roughly until 65 - or is the premium degrading over time? if you invest this much you end up at 750k or even more dont you?

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 15 2009, 06:12 PM
chew_ronnie
post Jul 15 2009, 06:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 15 2009, 06:07 PM)
chew_ronnie,

certain CI in europe are indeed very very cheap. i guess this also has to do with a different risk assesment.

the allianz offer is very costly for just a CI insurance. nothing attached to the policy?

premium alone would total up to 236k roughly until 65 - or is the premium degrading over time? if you invest this much you end up at 750k or even more dont you?
*
It covers Death/TPD/C.I whichever comes 1st. Premium fixed coz its an ILP.

Nothing else to offer.

Look at it this way. If you say investing of coz you'll earn 3 to 10 folds definitely, but the concept of insurance is it provide that sum assured anytime - not waiting till age 65 to get that 750K.
PJusa
post Jul 15 2009, 06:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
chew_ronnie,

i know i know... the policy premium is quoted you is only CI (but i think it covers a wider range of sickness my list has 75 listings) and no death, TPD and its not ILP. this most likely explains the entire difference in premium.

death alone for RM 1M would probably be another 60-100 EUR annually, TPD is the costly part i presume but this is not available with the insurance we use. they have this "unable to work policy" instead which is not a lump sum but pretty similar in premium to what you quoted just now so the secret is reveiled. splitting the insurances can get specific covers you want at very low prices wink.gif

and yes, we'll go ahead and take the policy from the german insurer. they are surprisingly unworried about the fact that they insure a malaysian citizen. they say they cover worldwide no matter what. just reserve the right to check with a german doc if they doubt the diagnosis which seems reasonable.
chew_ronnie
post Jul 15 2009, 06:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 15 2009, 06:20 PM)
chew_ronnie,

i know i know... the policy premium is quoted you is only CI (but i think it covers a wider range of sickness my list has 75 listings) and no death, TPD and its not ILP. this most likely explains the entire difference in premium.

death alone for RM 1M would probably be another 60-100 EUR annually, TPD is the costly part i presume but this is not available with the insurance we use. they have this "unable to work policy" instead which is not a lump sum but pretty similar in premium to what you quoted just now so the secret is reveiled. splitting the insurances can get specific covers you want at very low prices wink.gif

and yes, we'll go ahead and take the policy from the german insurer. they are surprisingly unworried about the fact that they insure a malaysian citizen. they say they cover worldwide no matter what. just reserve the right to check with a german doc if they doubt the diagnosis which seems reasonable.
*
Bravo!
gary_cts
post Jul 15 2009, 06:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jul 14 2009, 10:38 AM)
Hi my friend,

For your 3 mth old kid - it actually depends on what kind of protection you want and the budget you are able to afford and also the features. It actually doesnt matter what type of policy u get.

For hospitalisation - its best to linked it with an investment linked policy because of the lower Cost of Insurance so basically meaning that its premiums are quite cheap. Also do get at least a RM300 room and board for a child plan i.e. normally children are very prone to infection desease of the ear nose eye and throat so normally the child will be normally put in a single room (to seperate the illness to spread to other kids) and a single room in the hosp now is around Rm250 to RM270/nite.

If you would like to save some edu funds for your child - then get another separate endownment plan or the more popular 8 to 12 years saving plans from various companies. By doing this you will not mix up everything together - protection is protection and savings is savings.

For your case, would like to know how serious is your diabetic and ur hypertension level. Diabetic is a more serious issue here. So do let me know what is ur condition. I'm attached to Allianz and I have several cases of hypertension and all are accepted with loading.

You are free to pm me if you have queries. Thanks,
Ronnie
*
Hi Ronnie,

Tq for your kind advise.

I am looking on a budget of RM1000.00 to RM1200.00 p.a. for the yearly pymt premium considering of Hospitalization/Surgical/36 CI plan.

What do you think the plan will be?

The reason is because my company does not extend the benefit to cover my child's Hospitalization/Surgical if anything should happened to my boy.

As for savings, I plan to open up a SSPN a/c for my boy for RM3k which is enough to get a rebate from my income tax and consistently invest in mutual trust or in property.

As for the question of how serious is my illness, I am not sure I get you but for diabetic I am under pills medication since 5 years back and the sugar level reading fluctuate from 7 to 9. Hypertention under pill medication with the reading slightly high (border line case).

Tq

Gary


Added on July 15, 2009, 6:55 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 14 2009, 09:17 AM)
hi,

may i suggest you seperate the insurances? if you want medical cover, buy medical cover only. this will be a lot cheaper. for a very high cover, i believe AXA offers the highest limit (500k annually, no life-time limit). your kid will most likely be limited in choice by the plan you already have.

if you save yourself instead of getting the eduplan (buy bonds/investment fonds) then you save the policy overhead and the fat agent comission. why throw money out of the window? just buying the insurance will again minimize comission to the agent and thus maximise your money wink.gif

investment-link insurances are a waste of money in my opinion. they sell uncessary insurances and waste by means of comissions. also you should always find an agent to split comission with or go direct. the savings are huge.
*
Hi PJusa,

Tq for your opinion & kind advise.

I intend to purchase the Hospitalization/Surgical/CI plan formy boy with the budget of RM1000.00 to RM1200.00 p.a. yearly premium.

Also will be planning to open the SSPN a/c banking in RM3k to get the income tax rebate.

As for your info in buying the german insurance plan, I didn't realised that we can buy foreign insurance plan!

Gary

This post has been edited by gary_cts: Jul 15 2009, 06:55 PM
PJusa
post Jul 15 2009, 07:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi gary,

for your annual budget you can get your son a very good plan. i personally have chosen the axa smartcare plan with 500 k annual limit (costs around 700 RM for my 17 mth old daughter annually) and topped it up with tokio marine medic partner (10k deductable) to adjust the low cover for outpatient dialysis and cancer treatment from axa (they only pay lifetime 60k each, so 10k deductable for either kidney is more than enough and allows for 6 cancers before you have to pay a sen). tokio marine covers 150k max annually and 750k lifetime which is anough as an extra safety net if you ask me. premium is like 160 bucks or so.

so the combination will set you up nicely.

critical illness wont be needed from medical cost point of view then. if you want to protect death and TPD you might want to include him in your family plan if possible (for us this wasnt possible, we use MCIS 1M cover which does not take kids under 21).

the 3k savings is a good thing we forgot to buy it last year but will surely do it this december. instant savings smile.gif you can even use the taxes saved to buy/pay for some of the insurances. so it's win-win!

if you go for foreign insurance policies you need to approach them. many will refuse some wont. usually some insurance companies in UK / Ireland / Germany (we have or had from all three countries) have offers made for expats but those are often open to others too. for example allianz worldwidecare in ireland offers a really sweet medical insurance with optional outpatient cover. take a look at their website - the premiums are too high for me even for the asian plans. healthcare is not that costly here and they seems to cater more for hong kong ppl but its an option. we used to be with them for around 3 years and they paid all bills promptly on time and even the delivery of my wife was paid for entirely. nice!
numbertwo
post Jul 15 2009, 10:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 15 2009, 07:08 PM)
hi gary,

for your annual budget you can get your son a very good plan. i personally have chosen the axa smartcare plan with 500 k annual limit (costs around 700 RM for my 17 mth old daughter annually) and topped it up with tokio marine medic partner (10k deductable) to adjust the low cover for outpatient dialysis and cancer treatment from axa (they only pay lifetime 60k each, so 10k deductable for either kidney is more than enough and allows for 6 cancers before you have to pay a sen). tokio marine covers 150k max annually and 750k lifetime which is anough as an extra safety net if you ask me. premium is like 160 bucks or so.

so the combination will set you up nicely.

critical illness wont be needed from medical cost point of view then. if you want to protect death and TPD you might want to include him in your family plan if possible (for us this wasnt possible, we use MCIS 1M cover which does not take kids under 21).

the 3k savings is a good thing we forgot to buy it last year but will surely do it this december. instant savings smile.gif you can even use the taxes saved to buy/pay for some of the insurances. so it's win-win!

if you go for foreign insurance policies you need to approach them. many will refuse some wont. usually some insurance companies in UK / Ireland / Germany (we have or had from all three countries) have offers made for expats but those are often open to others too. for example allianz worldwidecare in ireland offers a really sweet medical insurance with optional outpatient cover. take a look at their website - the premiums are too high for me even for the asian plans. healthcare is not that costly here and they seems to cater more for hong kong ppl but its an option. we used to be with them for around 3 years and they paid all bills promptly on time and even the delivery of my wife was paid for entirely. nice!
*
Hi PJusa,

I'm interested to know about the tokio marine's medic plus (i assume you are in this plan).
Does TM's Medic Plus mention about "Renewal Guarantee", or cannot refuse renewal or impose new exclusions during renewal? The coverage (with deductible) is quite interesting... The only other medcard with 'deductible' option which I find OK is Pacific Insurance's Medi-Major.
PJusa
post Jul 15 2009, 11:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi numbertwo,

yes tokio marine has a guaranteed renewal after one claims free year ("Renewal guaranteed after 12 months of 'claims-free' period."). since it's only meant as a top up plan this should not be an issue.

i also looked into medi-major but found the premium way to high to serve as a top-up cover. this would probably be more suitable for someone who uses it as a standalone policy and then pays the initial costs him/herself.

for us the tokio marine sounded good for the outpatient cancer / dialysis benefits. so you can first claim from the basic insurance and then from tokio marine anything exceeding 10k, thus keeping some buffer on the basic insurance. the high life-time limit (if you only look at those two benefits) should be more than sufficient even if you are truely unlucky.

the only drawback is that the policy can only be renewed until 70. i truely hope Tokio Marine and Axa and all the others will soon offer their policies with a higher renewal age. there definitely is a lot of movements in the last two years and 100 seems to be become the new 80 so there is hope for the young(er) ones among us smile.gif
gary_cts
post Jul 16 2009, 12:42 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 15 2009, 07:08 PM)
hi gary,

for your annual budget you can get your son a very good plan. i personally have chosen the axa smartcare plan with 500 k annual limit (costs around 700 RM for my 17 mth old daughter annually) and topped it up with tokio marine medic partner (10k deductable) to adjust the low cover for outpatient dialysis and cancer treatment from axa (they only pay lifetime 60k each, so 10k deductable for either kidney is more than enough and allows for 6 cancers before you have to pay a sen). tokio marine covers 150k max annually and 750k lifetime which is anough as an extra safety net if you ask me. premium is like 160 bucks or so.

so the combination will set you up nicely.

critical illness wont be needed from medical cost point of view then. if you want to protect death and TPD you might want to include him in your family plan if possible (for us this wasnt possible, we use MCIS 1M cover which does not take kids under 21).

the 3k savings is a good thing we forgot to buy it last year but will surely do it this december. instant savings smile.gif you can even use the taxes saved to buy/pay for some of the insurances. so it's win-win!

if you go for foreign insurance policies you need to approach them. many will refuse some wont. usually some insurance companies in UK / Ireland / Germany (we have or had from all three countries) have offers made for expats but those are often open to others too. for example allianz worldwidecare in ireland offers a really sweet medical insurance with optional outpatient cover. take a look at their website - the premiums are too high for me even for the asian plans. healthcare is not that costly here and they seems to cater more for hong kong ppl but its an option. we used to be with them for around 3 years and they paid all bills promptly on time and even the delivery of my wife was paid for entirely. nice!
*
Hi Pjusa,

Tq again of your opinion. Does AXA & Tokio Marine's website shows the plas you mentioned? I would like to surf them up to read waht is offered.

As for the foreign insurancies policies, can you provide me their web site add for me to look around also?

Tq

Gary
PJusa
post Jul 16 2009, 08:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
gary,

tokio marine medic plus: http://www.tokiomarine.com.my/products/medical_plus.htm

AXA: http://www.axa.com.my/index.asp?pageid=pro...&prodid2=health (i use SmartCare Optimum)

Allianzworldwidecare (get a quote, select worldwide cover without US/Canada): http://www.allianzworldwidecare.com/index/...nce-cover-quote

i also used to contact AXA UK and others. the easiest is to look for medical insurance for expats in google - the are many brokers that offer to compare available plans. you dont really have to be an expat to get cover from them. most will insure you just like that. let them do the searching for you wink.gif but be prepared for very hefty premiums. allianzworldwidecare can easily reach a premium of 10,000 RM and higher p.a. for age braket of 30-35 already.

the german insurances will probably be only of help if you speak german. if you want to have some anyway let me know. i would suggest you stick with english speaking insurances otherwise.
numbertwo
post Jul 16 2009, 10:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
hi numbertwo,

yes tokio marine has a guaranteed renewal after one claims free year ("Renewal guaranteed after 12 months of 'claims-free' period."). since it's only meant as a top up plan this should not be an issue.

i also looked into medi-major but found the premium way to high to serve as a top-up cover. this would probably be more suitable for someone who uses it as a standalone policy and then pays the initial costs him/herself.

for us the tokio marine sounded good for the outpatient cancer / dialysis benefits. so you can first claim from the basic insurance and then from tokio marine anything exceeding 10k, thus keeping some buffer on the basic insurance. the high life-time limit (if you only look at those two benefits) should be more than sufficient even if you are truely unlucky.

the only drawback is that the policy can only be renewed until 70. i truely hope Tokio Marine and Axa and all the others will soon offer their policies with a higher renewal age. there definitely is a lot of movements in the last two years and 100 seems to be become the new 80 so there is hope for the young(er) ones among us smile.gif
*
Hi PJusa,
ya i made a call to TK to enquire the same.. Like you said, renewal is not guarantee if you have claims on the current policy year, they will impose exclusion, or add loadings depending on the illness.. This is one drawback (for me at least..). But of course their +ve is the outpatient cancer is as charged..but not the dialysis. So, yeah..good n bad. Thank for sharing.


PJusa
post Jul 16 2009, 11:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi numbertwo,

i think you misunderstood them - or did i? if you buy the policy and dont make any claims in the first 12 months you have a guaranteed renewal for the future. i will double check on this. tokio marine is brand new for me. if you are right and there is only a renewal guaranteed if the previous year no claims then this insurance is worthless too despite the nice coverage for outpatient cancer.

edit: i checked the policy wording and i think they communicated this wrongly to you. see this quote:

"15. Period of cover and renewal

[..]
Upon completion of 12 months of continous insurance under this Policy without any intimation of claims or Hospitalization whatsoever, only then this policy will be renewable at the option of insured subject to the terms, conditions and termination at each of the anniversary of the policy date. [..]

Such changes [add: to the premiums] shall be applicable to all insureds irrespective of their claim experience according to the company's risk assessment"

the way i read it is that after you go through 12 months (the first ones) without any claims they cant refuse to insure you. and you wont ever be subject to individual loading after this period. in others words its good for you if you survice the first year. i double checked this with one of my companies lawyers and he agrees to this interpretation. this doesnt make it saver but i think this will be the way. if you want double check with TM's underwriting. i would be willing to dispute any loading after the first year in a court of law - i think i would win smile.gif

cheers!

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 16 2009, 11:37 AM
cutepigy
post Jul 16 2009, 02:35 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jul 16 2009, 10:15 AM)
Hi PJusa,
ya i made a call to TK to enquire the same.. Like you said, renewal is not guarantee if you have claims on the current policy year, they will impose exclusion, or add loadings depending on the illness..  This is one drawback (for me at least..).  But of course their +ve is the outpatient cancer is as charged..but not the dialysis.  So, yeah..good n bad.  Thank for sharing.
*
Hi all,

I m newbie here...but i find premium for TM medicPlus is extremely cheap compare to normal conventional insurance provider... does it sound fishy????

As for guarantee renewal issue, there is a guideline by MMA that all insurance provider shud quote "it is guarantee renewal provided the insurer continue to provide this plan in the market". Which mean any insurance provider (IP) are allowed to withdraw the plan provided they have informed their customer few months in advance. Normally IP will opt to withdraw the plan rather than absorbing the losses if the claim is too high or mismanage continuously.

A typical example : i have a real case happen to my friend's mum who bought a medical card frm SIHAT MALAYSIA was not allowed to renew after she made a claim due to minor stroke hospitalisation.

On the other hand, another case where my friend's mum was allowed to renew her medical card with Great Eastern without any discruption after she made a claim due to Parkinson.

I was told to opt for Life insurance provider instead of General life Insurnce provider due guarantee renewal issue...as normally reputable Life Insurance Provider has better/larger pool for risk assesment.

cutepigy
chew_ronnie
post Jul 16 2009, 02:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(cutepigy @ Jul 16 2009, 02:35 PM)
Hi all,

I m newbie here...but i find premium for TM medicPlus is extremely cheap compare to normal conventional insurance provider... does it sound fishy????

As for guarantee renewal issue, there is a guideline by MMA that all insurance provider shud quote "it is guarantee renewal provided the insurer continue to provide this plan in the market". Which mean any insurance provider (IP) are allowed to withdraw the plan provided they have informed their customer few months in advance. Normally IP will opt to withdraw the plan rather than absorbing the losses if the claim is too high or mismanage continuously.

A typical example  : i have a real case happen to my friend's mum who bought a medical card frm SIHAT MALAYSIA was not allowed to renew after she made a claim due to minor stroke hospitalisation.

On the other hand, another case where my friend's mum was allowed to renew her medical card with Great Eastern without any discruption after she made a claim due to Parkinson.

I was told to opt for Life insurance provider instead of General life Insurnce provider due guarantee renewal issue...as normally reputable Life Insurance Provider has better/larger pool for risk assesment.

cutepigy
*
Hi I do agree on what you've said because life insurer has better/larger pool for risk assesment. Buy a med insurance with a Life Insurer.

Quote: As for guarantee renewal issue, there is a guideline by MMA that all insurance provider shud quote "it is guarantee renewal provided the insurer continue to provide this plan in the market". Which mean any insurance provider (IP) are allowed to withdraw the plan provided they have informed their customer few months in advance. Normally IP will opt to withdraw the plan rather than absorbing the losses if the claim is too high or mismanage continuously. [COLOR=red]This is exactly true if you really read the terms and conditions in the life policies - but also you must read their withdrawal portfolio and there are some other reasons when they wanna withdraw the said med policy.


SIHAT MALAYSIA is not guaranteed renewable and this happens to most of the med policies offered by General Insurer.

PJusa,

From the clause you posted, it looks to me like it is renwable NOT Guaranteed Renewable. The term guaranteed is a must for the arguement sake. As far as i'm concern - renewability is not guaranteed when they say a policy is renewable.
cutepigy
post Jul 16 2009, 03:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jul 16 2009, 02:59 PM)
Hi I do agree on what you've said because life insurer has better/larger pool for risk assesment. Buy a med insurance with a Life Insurer.

Quote: As for guarantee renewal issue, there is a guideline by MMA that all insurance provider shud quote "it is guarantee renewal provided the insurer continue to provide this plan in the market". Which mean any insurance provider (IP) are allowed to withdraw the plan provided they have informed their customer few months in advance. Normally IP will opt to withdraw the plan rather than absorbing the losses if the claim is too high or mismanage continuously. [COLOR=red]This is exactly true if you really read the terms and conditions in the life policies - but also you must read their withdrawal portfolio and there are some other reasons when they wanna withdraw the said med policy.
SIHAT MALAYSIA is not guaranteed renewable and this happens to most of the med policies offered by General Insurer.

PJusa,

From the clause you posted, it looks to me like it is renwable NOT Guaranteed Renewable. The term guaranteed is a must for the arguement sake. As far as i'm concern - renewability is not guaranteed when they say a policy is renewable.
*
I really find it puzzling with the extra cheap annual premium of TM's Medical card as compare with other few local Life IP. Anyone know why? Really puzzle me.... Haha.. wish to find out more as i am holding two expensive medical card (2x more expensive with the same plan and benefit with the so-called Life Insurance Provider.
PJusa
post Jul 16 2009, 03:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi guys,

let me adress a few things raised here:

1. the tokio marine plan is guaranteed renewable after an initial period of 12 months without any claims. guaranteed renewable and renewable at the option of the policy holder are identical in this case.

the key phrase here is : "this policy will be renewable at the option of insured" i.e. wether renewal or not is solely up to the insured (i.e. if you decide to pay the current premium all is good). also no loading after the first year. it's legally binding - once they take you and you pass 12 months of continous cover you are in the game.

this is of course a catch and explains partially why the premium is low.

2. why is the premium so much lower than other policies?

because you have to pay 10,000 RM for each and every desease first. it's only meant as a top-up plan for people who actually already have a different plan as a basis. unlike for example the allianz plan with a deductable, with tokio marine room and board is not excluded.

3. renewal guarantee

any plan - no matter from which insurance company - has a clause that allows the insurance company to withdraw the plan entirely. you will not be able to escape this.
normally if you choose a reputable insurance company this will not happen. should is still happen, you will most often find that you will be offered a take-over into a plan close to your original plan though.

4. sihat malaysia

as chew_ronnie said: they dont guarantee renewal. in other words: their medical cover is worthless as your friend experienced. since they can refuse cover at renewal, their premium can be a lot lower than a guaranteed renewal plan. you basically pay a (high) loading for this feature that is build into the plans premiums by default.

5. i dont believe the statements made that life insurance companies are less likely to remove a plan from the portfolio is true. i believe that the risk assesment of the companies is equally good and will result in equal probability of withdrawal. if you look at the portfolio risk, probably general insurance portfolio is even less risky. ppl who buy med.insurance alone are probably the most health conscious ppl in the pool and thus pose the smallest risk. this is only a guess and i can very well be wrong there. of course it's true - the larger the group of insured (and the lower their individual risk) the better the insurance can cover for claims cases. thus its always desireable to be in a large group when it comes to insurances.

edit: one more thing to life insurance with med. cover: this is not really designed to be a medical cover to begin with. it's merely a rider. this should tell you a lot already. get the cover (i.e. medical cover) from a company that seriously covers this risk. i.e. by medical cover from a medical insurance and by life insurance (if you want to) from a life insurance company. those are entirely different things and i dont believe they should be combined to begin with. if you ever need to terminate the life plan (say cause you cant afford the premium) your med cover is gone too. if you have just life and just med... you can easily cancel life and dont have to worry about med. why risk such things in the first place?

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 16 2009, 03:32 PM
numbertwo
post Jul 16 2009, 03:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 16 2009, 11:11 AM)
hi numbertwo,

i think you misunderstood them - or did i? if you buy the policy and dont make any claims in the first 12 months you have a guaranteed renewal for the future. i will double check on this. tokio marine is brand new for me. if you are right and there is only a renewal guaranteed if the previous year no claims then this insurance is worthless too despite the nice coverage for outpatient cancer.

edit: i checked the policy wording and i think they communicated this wrongly to you. see this quote:

"15. Period of cover and renewal

[..]
Upon completion of 12 months of continous insurance under this Policy without any intimation of claims or Hospitalization whatsoever, only then this policy will be renewable at the option of insured subject to the terms, conditions and termination at each of the anniversary of the policy date. [..]

Such changes [add: to the premiums] shall be applicable to all insureds irrespective of their claim experience according to the company's risk assessment"

the way i read it is that after you go through 12 months (the first ones) without any claims they cant refuse to insure you. and you wont ever be subject to individual loading after this period. in others words its good for you if you survice the first year. i double checked this with one of my companies lawyers and he agrees to this interpretation. this doesnt make it saver but i think this will be the way. if you want double check with TM's underwriting. i would be willing to dispute any loading after the first year in a court of law - i think i would win smile.gif

cheers!
*
Thank you for the time spent on flipping thru the policy contract..

I hd a word with their underwriter.. The first query about "12 months non-claim" clause, you are correct. subsequent years will be 'guranteed renewal'.. However, the underwriter told me subsequent renewal, although it is guaranteed renewable, they will still have to look at the claim experience, and exclusion or loading is not impossible especially when 'cancer' claims happened , as he mentioned.. Just sharing.

Anyhow, I think this is still worth a consideration for cutepigy, who is holding two expensive cards, where she/he can take the option of one major(the card) and another being the 'deductible' policy.
PJusa
post Jul 16 2009, 07:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
thanks for the reply. i seriously doubt any loading or exclusion is legally possible under this contract - despite what their underwriter says. the wording is actually very precise. no individual loading after the 12 months period. of course they might try it but i would assume they would loose if i contest it in court. i double checked with my lawyer and they agreed - if they try contest it. they have no legal foundation to impose a loading upon any individual who is insured under this policy after the initial 12 months period has lapsed. i find the information however very relevant. it's bad if tokio marine does not honour their contracts. i will double check on this particular issue tomorrow with whoever is in charge of the operation. if they do this - it's an outrage and i will file a complaint with bank negara. not that i am affected but it's unethical.
Justin1000
post Jul 16 2009, 11:29 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 16 2009, 08:13 PM)
thanks for the reply. i seriously doubt any loading or exclusion is legally possible under this contract - despite what their underwriter says. the wording is actually very precise. no individual loading after the 12 months period. of course they might try it but i would assume they would loose if i contest it in court. i double checked with my lawyer and they agreed - if they try contest it. they have no legal foundation to impose a loading upon any individual who is insured under this policy after the initial 12 months period has lapsed. i find the information however very relevant. it's bad if tokio marine does not honour their contracts. i will double check on this particular issue tomorrow with whoever is in charge of the operation. if they do this - it's an outrage and i will file a complaint with bank negara. not that i am affected but it's unethical.
*
The guaranteed renewal of the hospitalization & Surgical Insurance does not include premium. In other words, the policyholder can renew but the premium amount is not guaranteed. There is no way any insurer can guarantee the same premium rate given that the medical inflation and cost of health care is not static and unpredictable.

General insurer normally underwrites the risk on a yearly basis while the life insurers underwrites based on the long tenure of the policy bought. That explains why general insurer's premium is much lower as the risk to them is only one year. Thereafter , upon renewal it is being underwritten again, i.e. the risk is being assessed again and appropriate premium accorded

In the case of a life insurer, as long a the premium is paid on time, the policy will continue, but they can increase the premium as this is not guaranteed though the renewal of the contract can be guaranteed.


The other difference between general insurer and life insurer is, general insurer can increase the premium of an individual member based on the individual risk, while in life, the premium increase is done across the board to everyone based on the en bloc risk from time to time subject to approval from the Regulator.

Even there is guarantee renewal, the insurer has the option of not transacting the portfolio, however usually the existing policies can continue until its expiry at the next anniversary of the policy. There is another version of policy termed as non cancellable policy where the insurer cannot cancel the contract on its own as long as the member continue to pay the premium. However, the catch here is the insurer can continue to raise the premium given that the cost of claims continues to hike . This will eventually force the member to abandon the ship when the premium is no more affordable or make sense to continue.


As such , as I have mentioned in my earlier msg some where that we must take note of how the insurer manage their risk, as they have the moral responsibility to take care of the fund contributed by the people who do not claim as they are healthy.An insurer that is very liberally and freely paying claims can be a concern, as the fund of people who do not claim can be depleted fast and premium can go up. Always remember this, insurers are not prepared to lose money.

So friend, I hope I have not confused you





PJusa
post Jul 17 2009, 08:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Justin1000,

it's totally clear that the premium is not guaranteed. that is the case for general insurance as well as a medical rider. how else could it be? there is no difference with this respect between life and general insurance at all. if i take up a guaranteed renewal contract from a general insurane the situation is the same as with a life insurance. premium might go (it surely will) but they have to take me. if you choose your policy properly your insurer will not have the right to increase an individual premium. this defies the purpose of the insurance. neither AXA nor TM can increase the individual premium after accepting a risk. this why they are interesting after all. many general insurance companies do reserve this particular right so you have to choose carefully but its not across board like that. with life insurance i believe only the life portion of the insurance is subject to regulatory approval for premium increases. the riders can to the best of my knowledge be increased merely on internal risk assessment.

for a guaranteed renewal (which is no longer offered in contracts) companies offer a renewal at the option of the insured. this does make a difference becauese it does not allow the insurer to refuse renewal as long as the product exists. and even if the portfolio would be withdrawn existing policies can lapse out first.

so i am a bit at a loss as to what point you are trying to make. with respect to your points there is no difference between life and general insurance with respect to change of premium and strategy to make you cancel. only with life you also loose the rest of your protection if they increase the rider premium for healthcare to a level you cant afford. so again you are better off just loosing one policy than a package or worse even beeing forced to let go of the investment part in a unfavourable economic environment.

the only points that matter imho are:

- large base
- good claims handling
- affordable premiums (to allow for large base)
- concentrating on a product at a time and not a set of products
numbertwo
post Jul 17 2009, 09:21 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(Justin1000 @ Jul 16 2009, 11:29 PM)
.....

...

The other difference between general insurer and life insurer is, general insurer can increase the premium of an individual member based on the individual risk, while in life, the premium increase is done across the board to everyone based on the en bloc risk from time to time subject to approval from the Regulator.
.....


*
Hi ya,
Not quite true as far as I know from reading several medical card brochures and getting explanation from the respective company... THere is a clause in the general insurer's (Note : not from all general insurers though, must find one that has it) medical product that says "..Portfolio Pricing of premium.." - Increase of premium will be on portfolio basis, person who has claimed on the policy will not be singled out to pay more premium than others.'' This is a direct quote from xxxx product brochure and I take it that it has a legal binding too.
PJusa
post Jul 17 2009, 10:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

you are absolutely correct


Added on July 17, 2009, 12:04 pmnumbertwo,

i had a word with bank negara regarding what the underwriter told you. they were very nice (and free as it seems). they told me that based upon the policy wording it is impossible for TM to impose any kind of individual loading. this is further confirmed by this statement:

"15. [..]
On each such anniversary, this Policy is renewable at the premium rates in effect at that time as notified by the company.
"

the problem they and i now see is that they reserve the right to alterations of the policy. TM reserves the right to ammendments only. which in fact means that the whole portfolio can be changed. the question is: since it only covers ammendments, the renewal most likely cant be changed but the list of exlusions might be ammended. so your underwriter might be right about this. the grounds for this are however very shaky. i will let my lawyer skim through the contract again as mine is due for renewal soon and i dont want to make any mistakes there. my lawyer seems to be of the (current) opinion that ammendments to the contract should only be legal if made to the portfolio contract but its a lot to read so there might be a loophole hidden for TM.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 17 2009, 12:04 PM
numbertwo
post Jul 17 2009, 12:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 17 2009, 10:53 AM)
numbertwo,

you are absolutely correct


Added on July 17, 2009, 12:04 pmnumbertwo,

i had a word with bank negara regarding what the underwriter told you. they were very nice (and free as it seems). they told me that based upon the policy wording it is impossible for TM to impose any kind of individual loading. this is further confirmed by this statement:

"15. [..]
On each such anniversary, this Policy is renewable at the premium rates in effect at that time as notified by the company.
"

the problem they and i now see is that they reserve the right to alterations of the policy. TM reserves the right to ammendments only. which in fact means that the whole portfolio can be changed. the question is: since it only covers ammendments, the renewal most likely cant be changed but the list of exlusions might be ammended. so your underwriter might be right about this. the grounds for this are however very shaky. i will let my lawyer skim through the contract again as mine is due for renewal soon and i dont want to make any mistakes there. my lawyer seems to be of the (current) opinion that ammendments to the contract should only be legal if made to the portfolio contract but its a lot to read so there might be a loophole hidden for TM.
*
You are truely a respected consumer notworthy.gif

Don't we all used to screw by this term : "xxxxx reserves the right to change the policy/contract" in all kind of contracts in M'sia... *SIGH* vmad.gif
I guess the minimum requirement we must filter or insists on the policy is the amendment/introduction to the exclusion list must not be made on individual's past claim records, it must be on portfolio basis.
PJusa
post Jul 17 2009, 01:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

yes i am afraid so. at least TM only reserves the right to ammend the policy. big difference there. still it's bad for the customer. as a consumer who is looking for a healthcare policy you need to be 110% sure you can rely upon the insurance company even if you cost them a bomb as an individual. otherwise you dont an insurance right?

i will get in touch with tokio marine and will try to get an official statement from them. this will probably be very hard but it's worth a shot. also if we can obtain a guarantee of some sort that the right to ammend will not be exercised to impose exclusions that are not portfolio based things would be clear for everyone who uses their insurance.

lesson: tripple read policy wordings bit by bit. it's not enough to read it once (sigh).

i know that AXA is commiting to this. they will not impose any kind of loading nor individual loading and they guarantee the renewal after they accepted your proposal. that is a good plan - it does come at a price though - if you are 80 your premium for 500k annual limit exceeds 10,000 if i am not mistaken. but at least they are honest with the insured about costs and terms. simple annual limit, no life-time limit on top of this only the one implied by the annual limit. i like that very much smile.gif

if i get anything out of tokio marine i will report back. i am still convinced that their plan _can_ be the ideal top up when u need just a little extra buffer and a good outpatient dialysis / cancer cover.


Added on July 17, 2009, 1:54 pmi am very surprised. i just spoke the TM HQ: they checked for me and ammendments are only on a portfolio basis. they suggested i write in and will get an official reply on the matter. i will do this as this will leave no further room for interpretation. this is very good news for me and i do hope they will confirm their reply in writing and not change their reply in the meantime smile.gif

should they commit in writing to only ammend on a portfolio basis, their insurance should be ideal as a top-up and meet the strictest and most demanding consumer wink.gif

i have to say i am really glad we are having this discussion and are getting into the details. i creates awareness among all of us and we all learn a lot dont we? i always thought i was safe by the no loading part but seriously overlooked the trap of ammendment until now.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 17 2009, 01:54 PM
c.o.o.l
post Jul 17 2009, 02:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Wow, spend some time reading the post. PJusa you really spend alot of time in getting to know what you actually buying. Thumbs up on you. There is still alot of people who dono what they have bought.
numbertwo
post Jul 17 2009, 03:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


PJusa,
yes pls do update us when you get their official reply.. But instead of replying you on individual basis, I do wish that they could publish this 'advantage' in their product brochures, or even their online web.. This will surely attract lots more buying interests.

Actually i met up with a ''financial planner'' - (who could represent several insurers instead of bias to only one), he only recommended the TM's PA to me but not their Medic plans, but instead he recommended Pacific's for the same reason we have been discussing - the exclusions/loading bit, becoz TM has never specifically lay this 'advantage' down in any of their brochures.. And because of this, I am quite close to pen down the Pacific top-up plan, as they are the only one putting down black n white on their brochures on no loading/exclusions on personal basis.. But like you said, their premium is not the cheapest after knowing that TM has the similar top-up plan. So, let's hope things turn brighter soon..

tc
PJusa
post Jul 17 2009, 04:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

i will post their reply here. i was also draw between pacific and TM - in the end i didnt deem pacific's plan worth it. our basic cover is relatively high so we only need minimal additional coverage mainly TM's outpatient benefits. this is why i am reluctant to spend a lot there (esp. when you get old).

i am surprised your financial planner suggested TM for PA. is the dollar to dollar ratio for cover vs. premium that good? dont forget the PA comission is 25% so if you go directly to a different insurance you will be able to reduce the premium substantially. i tried many times to get a walk-in rebate from TM (=pay me the agent comission) and they always refused. same with MSIG. other companies do pay you the agent comission...

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 17 2009, 06:17 PM
Justin1000
post Jul 17 2009, 06:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 17 2009, 09:10 AM)
Justin1000,

it's totally clear that the premium is not guaranteed. that is the case for general insurance as well as a medical rider. how else could it be? there is no difference with this respect between life and general insurance at all. if i take up a guaranteed renewal contract from a general insurane the situation is the same as with a life insurance. premium might go (it surely will) but they have to take me. if you choose your policy properly your insurer will not have the right to increase an individual premium. this defies the purpose of the insurance. neither AXA nor TM can increase the individual premium after accepting a risk. this why they are interesting after all. many general insurance companies do reserve this particular right so you have to choose carefully but its not across board like that. with life insurance i believe only the life portion of the insurance is subject to regulatory approval for premium increases. the riders can to the best of my knowledge be increased merely on internal risk assessment.

for a guaranteed renewal (which is no longer offered in contracts) companies offer a renewal at the option of the insured. this does make a difference becauese it does not allow the insurer to refuse renewal as long as the product exists. and even if the portfolio would be withdrawn existing policies can lapse out first.

so i am a bit at a loss as to what point you are trying to make. with respect to your points there is no difference between life and general insurance with respect to change of premium and strategy to make you cancel. only with life you also loose the rest of your protection if they increase the rider premium for healthcare to a level you cant afford. so again you are better off just loosing one policy than a package or worse even beeing forced to let go of the investment part in a unfavourable economic environment.

the only points that matter imho are:

- large base
- good claims handling
- affordable premiums (to allow for large base)
- concentrating on a product at a time and not a set of products
*
Life policy (other than term plan)does not increase the premium once it is locked in, that is why it is always good to buy young. However the mrdical rider or plan, the insurers can increase the premium subject to approval from Regulator.
From what I understand, traditionally general insurer's H&S plan is priced on a year to year basis, if there is some thing new , share with me.


PJusa
post Jul 17 2009, 07:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Justin1000,

as you just said - its the same thing. the rider is not guaranteed premium wise. non of the life insurance plans i have seen (AIA and some others) have a fixed premium for the medical rider. this would not make sense anyway unless the premium is set waaaay to high to begin with. they dont want to make a loss on the rider after all. all the life plan proposals i have seen (have an AIA in front of me) highlight the very fact that the medical rider's premium is not guaranteed and will increase with age.

if this would not be true, life+medical rider would be the secret recipe to low healthcare premiums. just buy for the newborn and be safe. it's just not like that at all.
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 18 2009, 08:27 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(numbertwo @ May 30 2009, 05:18 PM)
The way I look at this is , either you buy the extra medical coverage NOW or after 55,  you got to pay the same kind of rate when you reach 55.  It doesn't mean that the premium you pay now will stay when you reach 55, isnt the MC premium usually tier rated?  yes ? no?  So, this isn't really a drawback imo..
Some said this is correct.

Furthermore, some people also said medical card (MC) insurance is similar to car insurance. Whereby if you do not make any claim, at the end of the year you do not get any money back either. This is very unlike life insurance whereby it is usually not advisable to surrender a policy because you had bought it when you are younger.

Assuming these 2 facts are correct (please correct me if I am wrong), then there is nothing to lose if we cancel off a present MC policy (originally bought 9 years ago) and opt for others that we think is better. Am I correct?

Thanks in advance for any help here.

PJusa
post Jul 18 2009, 10:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi Optiplex330,

this is not entirely true at all. if you buy a medical insurance early (as early as you can actually!) and you have a guaranteed renewal, no loading, no exlcusions policy you have made the best possible choice. if sickness strikes, no matter how hard, you will have an insurance to cover for you. this is the principle of insurance. if you wait until something happens, such risks are becoming bad risks - noone will insure them and you will have to fork it out for yourself.

insurance is not about getting money back. dont confuse this please. it's a common misconception in malaysia that an insurance should make you money. this not at all the case! let me explain to you what the purpose of an insurance is:

a group of people realise that they are all exposed to some risk (sickness for example) which can potentially be very very expensive. so expensive indeed that they would not be able to pay for the costs themselfes. but there is an advantage: the risk that such a risk materialises is very very small. if however it occurs it will ruin the individual. now say the costs would be 250,000 for a specific event. the risk that it will materialise is 0.001% annually. so on average anyone of this group will face an _expected_ loss of 250,000 * 0.001% = 2,5. this is very little indeed! so if a large number of people agree to pay 2,5 every year (plus some admin fees etc. so maybe make it 3,00) into a large pool and if one of them faces the loss the losss shall be absorbed from the pool then this is an insurance.
for the individual the loss is now know: i have to pay 3,00 annually to be covered. that is that. i will have to pay no matter what but if something happens, the group will save me.

its not the group's pool purpose to invest 3,00 annually and return profits to you. that is what investments are for. dont mix insurance and investment as they are entirely different things. this is also why i do not support ILP life insurances with medical riders. they dont make sense from an economical and risk assesment point. probably the main reason why people buy them anyway is because you are promised some kind of profit. that is not what insurance is about though.

if you cancel your present medical policy to switch to a new one, the new policy will asses your risk at the current situation - not at the situation when you first signed up and were (possible) more healthy. so when age increases, you will find it harder to find an insurer willing to take over your risk without loadings / exclusions etc. esp. if you made claims in the past. if you are still healthy, there is no problem with switching at all - you can even apply for a takeover so the waiting periods will be mostly or entirely waived. i have switchted three times in the past without any hassle but this is because we were and are still in good health and young.
if you wait until you are 55 you might get yourself into trouble. it wont be as easy to get cover as with age 1. for that reason you should stay away from lifetime limits and only seek annual limits (with an implied lifetime limit of limit*years of insurance possible). otherwise once your limit is eaten up, you are in trouble too. such life time limit policies are only usefull as top-up for extra expensive risks.

hope i was clear and not too confusing wink.gif
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 18 2009, 04:02 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 18 2009, 10:17 AM)
hi Optiplex330,

this is not entirely true at all. if you buy a medical insurance early (as early as you can actually!) and you have a guaranteed renewal, no loading, no exlcusions policy you have made the best possible choice. if sickness strikes, no matter how hard, you will have an insurance to cover for you. this is the principle of insurance. if you wait until something happens, such risks are becoming bad risks - noone will insure them and you will have to fork it out for yourself.

insurance is not about getting money back. dont confuse this please. it's a common misconception in malaysia that an insurance should make you money. this not at all the case! let me explain to you what the purpose of an insurance is:

if you cancel your present medical policy to switch to a new one, the new policy will asses your risk at the current situation - not at the situation when you first signed up and were (possible) more healthy. so when age increases, you will find it harder to find an insurer willing to take over your risk without loadings / exclusions etc. esp. if you made claims in the past. if you are still healthy, there is no problem with switching at all - you can even apply for a takeover so the waiting periods will be mostly or entirely waived. i have switchted three times in the past without any hassle but this is because we were and are still in good health and young.
if you wait until you are 55 you might get yourself into trouble. it wont be as easy to get cover as with age 1. for that reason you should stay away from lifetime limits and only seek annual limits (with an implied lifetime limit of limit*years of insurance possible). otherwise once your limit is eaten up, you are in trouble too. such life time limit policies are only usefull as top-up for extra expensive risks.

hope i was clear and not too confusing wink.gif
*
Thank you for your detailed explanation. Yes, I already knew that insurance is not for profit and if you have disease, the premium are no longer the same etc.

What I wanted to know is, assuming our health remains the same as 9 yrs ago when we bought our 1st medical insurance, and now another company offers a better deal, is there any reason not to switch? If it is a life insurance, I don't think it is wise to do so. But if Medical insurance is like car insurance, I don't see why not?

The insurance cpg that I first bought from 9 yrs ago has a lifetime limit of RM225K. Annual limit of RM75K.

But another company seems to offer better benefit for roughly the same premium. Hence my thought of switching.

This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jul 18 2009, 05:04 PM
Justin1000
post Jul 18 2009, 06:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 17 2009, 08:16 PM)
Justin1000,

as you just said - its the same thing. the rider is not guaranteed premium wise. non of the life insurance plans i have seen (AIA and some others) have a fixed premium for the medical rider. this would not make sense anyway unless the premium is set waaaay to high to begin with. they dont want to make a loss on the rider after all. all the life plan proposals i have seen (have an AIA in front of me) highlight the very fact that the medical rider's premium is not guaranteed and will increase with age.

if this would not be true, life+medical rider would be the secret recipe to low healthcare premiums. just buy for the newborn and be safe. it's just not like that at all.
*
Yes, H&S plan's premium goes up for different age band. THis applies to all whether it is life or general insurer.

In life policy, a basic policy which pays for death or disability, while the medical rider is for other benefits such H&S, Accident etc. One has the option to buy just a basic policy with or without riders, and there is another option of buying a package plan i.e. basic plus rider say H&S, if this is how the insurer markets its product.

For both the instances, the rider plan will go up per the age band while the basic plan premium stays still. However depending on the insurers, for the package plan, there could be a breakdown on the rise while for some companies, it may just show as a total increase.

On top of the periodic increase due to age band, insurer has the option to increase premium ,if the claim cost is too high to make the product sustainable.
PJusa
post Jul 18 2009, 06:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Optiplex330,

in that case apply for the new company and request a take over. take overs are "encouraged" by bank negara. take over means your waiting period will be waived. otherwise you need to account for an initial overlap between the policies to ensure you are covered. for example a take over might be refused if the benefits are significantly better. in that case get the waiting periods from the company. for this duration you will need your old policy so you need to time the purchase properly.

other than that you dont loose anything as you would with life. you are perfectly save to switch assuming your health is the same. i would get the approval from new insurer first before i decide not to renew the old insurance.

mind sharing what company you want to switch to?


Added on July 18, 2009, 6:12 pmJustin1000,

this is exactly my point. there is and cannot be a difference in the way the medical cover works be it from life or general insurer. and this is the reason why it's not advisable to choose life + rider to cover for health. if you want to cover health - take a health policy.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 18 2009, 06:12 PM
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 18 2009, 06:18 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 18 2009, 06:11 PM)
Optiplex330,

in that case apply for the new company and request a take over. take overs are "encouraged" by bank negara. take over means your waiting period will be waived. otherwise you need to account for an initial overlap between the policies to ensure you are covered. for example a take over might be refused if the benefits are significantly better. in that case get the waiting periods from the company. for this duration you will need your old policy so you need to time the purchase properly.

other than that you dont loose anything as you would with life. you are perfectly save to switch assuming your health is the same. i would get the approval from new insurer first before i decide not to renew the old insurance.

mind sharing what company you want to switch to?

*
So you are saying, assuming my health remains the same, ditching a medical card insurance is like ditching a car insurance? Unlike life whereby buying a new life insurance at 9 yrs older means higher premium?

I was thinking of changing from Prudential to AXA. The lifetime limit seems to be twice of Prudential at roughly the same premium.


PJusa
post Jul 18 2009, 08:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
yes assuming axa does not want to impose any loading or exclusions on you you can simply switch the policy. this is the advantage of a general insurance product. unlike like with rider you are not bound. the premiums are per age band and no old age savings to couchon the increasing premiums are beeing made that you might loose. so you loose absolutely nothing.

but: do make sure axa want you without exclusions and loadings first. also insist to treat the change as a takeover of the policy. if you dont get it as takeover, waiting periods apply that last up to 120 days for specific illnesses. if such periods apply you should make sure that your cover from prudential overlaps with the new axa plan so that prudential would have to pay when axa will not yet pay. always try to account for the worst wink.gif

and i agree with you on axa. they're benefits are lot better than most other insurances in the market. but i think only the SmartCare Executive has a lifetime limit. and this plan has a major catch. they have a sublimit per disability! please be aware of this.

the SmartCare Optimum does not have any lifetime limit only an annual limit. i strongly suggest this plan over the executive plan despite the difference in cost. in the long run not having a lifetime limit is almost invaluable esp. if you intend to run the plan until old age.
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 18 2009, 08:48 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 18 2009, 08:37 PM)
yes assuming axa does not want to impose any loading or exclusions on you you can simply switch the policy. this is the advantage of a general insurance product. unlike like with rider you are not bound. the premiums are per age band and no old age savings to couchon the increasing premiums are beeing made that you might loose. so you loose absolutely nothing.
*
Wow. You sure know this insurance thing. Thanks.

So now I know Medical card is just a form of general insurance product like car insurance, fire insurance or marine insurance. In that there is no advantage or reward for having stayed with the same insurance company for many years. Find a better offer and jumping ship is the name of the game. You lost nothing.

But can you clarify further what you meant by rider and old age saving thing?

And if I go to AXA, do I have to undergo all the medical examination thing even though I have never made any claim from Prudential?

Much appreciated.

This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jul 18 2009, 08:49 PM
PJusa
post Jul 19 2009, 10:07 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Optiplex330,

i just want to highlight one important difference when it comes to medical insurance:

if you are under a guaranteed / no loading / no exclusions plan there is a benefit to remain once sickness strikes. you still get the low premiums that everyone else gets while new companies will put loadings and / or exclusions upon you. also when you are in the renewal only part of the insurance you wont be able to switch anymore.

regarding your question of old age savings: this does not exist in malaysian policies. in europe many health plans work like this: despite the insurer beeing able to offer very low premiums for healthy people, they ask you to pay more. this extra is then saved and will be used to offset your premiums in old age. the catch: its not easy to move these savings from one company to another so they can effectively lock you in through this measure.

with respect to the rider and you beeing bound: what i mean is that if you buy an ILP product (i.e. life with medical rider) you are commiting to a significan savings plan. if you later decide to switch companies and you want to cancel the plan, you have to cancel the entire policy. this usually means you are loosing out. also you are commiting a larger part of resources this way which might be harder to come up with in old age when premiums might very well be 1000 RM per month or more for an adequate cover.

if you go to axa the medical info will depend on your age and wether it will be treated as a takeover or not. in most cases a health declaration will do. make sure to disclose any little detail you can think of. if you remain silent about it, the insurer might be able to cancel the entire policy at a later date due to misrepresentation of facts.
usually listing everything will mean no harm - they might just ask you to clarify in order to avoid an exclusion.

i suggest you call AXA and let them know you want tho switch under takeover from your current prudential plan. they will advise you further. please note that if the benefits are significantly better than your current plan, your switch might not be considerred a takeover and waiting periods will apply.

on a sidenote: the agent comission for health insurance is high. i believe its 15% of your annual premium every year. if you find an agent to split comission with or go as a walk-in you can save a significant part of the premiums. AXA does not offer a walk-in discount so you need to find an agent to split comission with. (i am still looking for an agent to split the comission with for my tokio marine plan!)

personally i always try to get the agent comission as a walk-in. if they refuse, i look for an alternative insurance. if none exists, i look for an agent to split comission with. otherwise i still go direct as this means the company is saving money and if everyone would do this this would mean that premiums can remain lower for a longer period of time. (no offence agents, i know some of you do a good job in helping with claims but not everyone needs this help. most insurers will also help you if you know your rights. if you are of the kind who accepts anything an insurer tells you, then its better to seek the help of an agent for claims....)
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 19 2009, 02:51 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 19 2009, 10:07 AM)
Optiplex330,

i just want to highlight one important difference when it comes to medical insurance:

if you are under a guaranteed / no loading / no exclusions plan there is a benefit to remain once sickness strikes. you still get the low premiums that everyone else gets while new companies will put loadings and / or exclusions upon you. also when you are in the renewal only part of the insurance you wont be able to switch anymore.

regarding your question of old age savings: this does not exist in malaysian policies. in europe many health plans work like this: despite the insurer beeing able to offer very low premiums for healthy people, they ask you to pay more. this extra is then saved and will be used to offset your premiums in old age. the catch: its not easy to move these savings from one company to another so they can effectively lock you in through this measure.

with respect to the rider and you beeing bound: what i mean is that if you buy an ILP product (i.e. life with medical rider) you are commiting to a significan savings plan. if you later decide to switch companies and you want to cancel the plan, you have to cancel the entire policy. this usually means you are loosing out. also you are commiting a larger part of resources this way which might be harder to come up with in old age when premiums might very well be 1000 RM per month or more for an adequate cover.

if you go to axa the medical info will depend on your age and wether it will be treated as a takeover or not. in most cases a health declaration will do. make sure to disclose any little detail you can think of. if you remain silent about it, the insurer might be able to cancel the entire policy at a later date due to misrepresentation of facts.
usually listing everything will mean no harm - they might just ask you to clarify in order to avoid an exclusion.

i suggest you call AXA and let them know you want tho switch under takeover from your current prudential plan. they will advise you further. please note that if the benefits are significantly better than your current plan, your switch might not be considerred a takeover and waiting periods will apply.

on a sidenote: the agent comission for health insurance is high. i believe its 15% of your annual premium every year. if you find an agent to split comission with or go as a walk-in you can save a significant part of the premiums. AXA does not offer a walk-in discount so you need to find an agent to split comission with. (i am still looking for an agent to split the comission with for my tokio marine plan!)

personally i always try to get the agent comission as a walk-in. if they refuse, i look for an alternative insurance. if none exists, i look for an agent to split comission with. otherwise i still go direct as this means the company is saving money and if everyone would do this this would mean that premiums can remain lower for a longer period of time. (no offence agents, i know some of you do a good job in helping with claims but not everyone needs this help. most insurers will also help you if you know your rights. if you are of the kind who accepts anything an insurer tells you, then its better to seek the help of an agent for claims....)
*
Thanks for answering my question and I am trying hard to understand all these. In the process, more questions and hope you wouldn't mind answering.

On rider you talked about. My present Prud is indeed investment linked. From what I understand, it composes of 3 parts, namely,
1. a life insurance of minimal value.
2. a saving in the form of investment in some unit trust
3. a medical insurance.

And I do understand the value allocated to the investment and medical insurance varies with time, with more toward med insurance as time goes by. And this is important---by continuing to stay with Prud, they are not going to give me discount on the medical insurance anyway (it being a General Insurance product), as we mentioned before. Right?

If the above is correct, do I have the following few options?
1. Continue to pay for the life insurance and investment BUT cancel the medical insurance. By doing so, the life insurance remains active until I die and the investment part will continue to grow because I am still putting new money into it.

2. Stop paying everything. The medical insurance will lapsed and automatically cancel by year end. But the life will remain active till I die. But because there is NO new money into it, the investment part will no longer grow but whatever had been invested in the past 9 years is still there either for me to withdraw right away or upon maturity.

Is my above understanding correct?

Thanks again.

This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jul 19 2009, 02:52 PM
PJusa
post Jul 19 2009, 03:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Optiplex330,

first of yes, you are in a bit of a problem. the good part is the minimal value of the life insurance. i understand it's already nine years old. i am not sure how much you have already saved but in the current situation its likely that the savings part is worth now only 60-40% of what you initially paid into. ending the entire policy would thus lead to a significant loss.

i am not sure if you can cancel just the rider. your agent should be able to help you there. what you are facing is the main reason why i suggest not to use ILP for medical cover.

from my point of view option one and two dont make a lot of difference since you are not forced to materialise paper-losses. i.e. you can wait until the funds rise in value again. if you deem the performance good then you can continue to invest further.

it is very hard to say what is the best solution for you right now. one would have to look into the contract to see where exactly the money is going to. we would also have to consider agent comissions when looking at options and what alternative investments are at your disposal. at the end of the day the question would be: how do you profit more - stop paying, just canceling the rider or even cancel the entire policy (most likely not a good idea). then we take into account moneys freed in the process and apply an alternative investment (you could for example buy the same funds through the bank). then you can make an unbiased decision just based on optimising your future funds.

how much are you paying right now for the plan and do you know the current distribution of the money into the three parts?

SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 20 2009, 08:12 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 19 2009, 03:05 PM)
Optiplex330,

first of yes, you are in a bit of a problem. the good part is the minimal value of the life insurance. i understand it's already nine years old. i am not sure how much you have already saved but in the current situation its likely that the savings part is worth now only 60-40% of what you initially paid into. ending the entire policy would thus lead to a significant loss.

i am not sure if you can cancel just the rider. your agent should be able to help you there. what you are facing is the main reason why i suggest not to use ILP for medical cover.

from my point of view option one and two dont make a lot of difference  since you are not forced to materialise paper-losses. i.e. you can wait until the funds rise in value again. if you deem the performance good then you can continue to invest further.

it is very hard to say what is the best solution for you right now. one would have to look into the contract to see where exactly the money is going to. we would also have to consider agent comissions when looking at options and what alternative investments are at your disposal. at the end of the day the question would be: how do you profit more - stop paying, just canceling the rider or even cancel the entire policy (most likely not a good idea). then we take into account moneys freed in the process and apply an alternative investment (you could for example buy the same funds through the bank). then you can make an unbiased decision just based on optimising your future funds.

how much are you paying right now for the plan and do you know the current distribution of the money into the three parts?
*
Last year, I checked and it was roughly RM1250 to medical, RM130 for life and RM400 for investment. What do you think?

PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 08:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Optiplex330,

alright. since the majority goes into medical, i would be very much biased to switching. this is the good news. 1250 annually should buy you very, very good cover (assuming you are below 35).

have a chat with prudential about canceling the medical rider. then you can decide if you want to keep the remaining insurance of get a new one alltogether. also get the current surrender value so you can see how big your loss (if any) is.

if you are unable to cancel the medical rider then you will have to consider two options:

a) cancel it all and cut the losses
b) use AXA and keep Pru as a top-up. considering the premium (how old are you btw?) this is a waste of resources though and you will probably be better of with a) and using a different insurance as a top up.
numbertwo
post Jul 20 2009, 10:23 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 18 2009, 08:37 PM)
*snipped*

and i agree with you on axa. they're benefits are lot better than most other insurances in the market. but i think only the SmartCare Executive has a lifetime limit. and this plan has a major catch. they have a sublimit per disability! please be aware of this.

the SmartCare Optimum does not have any lifetime limit only an annual limit. i strongly suggest this plan over the executive plan despite the difference in cost. in the long run not having a lifetime limit is almost invaluable esp. if you intend to run the plan until old age.
*
PJusa,

I thought both SCO and SCE has per-disability limition ?



And just to add on a comment for Optiplex330,

QUOTE
Last year, I checked and it was roughly RM1250 to medical, RM130 for life and RM400 for investment. What do you think?
Your premium allocation seems weird. After serving this ILP policy for 9 years, your ILP should not just use RM400 for investment. Assuming your policy premium is RM2000 a year, RM2000 should be used to buy unit trust, and PRU will then deducts the life insurance cost, medical cost, as well as other riders' cost from the units... Or is this not an ILP?

Btw..Another consideration whether to drop the ILP entirely or to keep the live protection part of it (assuming Pru allows you to cut the medical rider), is to look at your age. Insurance cost for ILP increase significantly after age 40 (increase almost every year after this age).. So, if you are still below 30 or so (have another 5-10 years to reach 40!), i would say keep the ILP if financially allowed. AFter paying for 9 years, premium allocation % of your ILP has just started to allocate 100% of your premium into investment (buying units) after 7th or 8th years (pls check with your policy). And If Pru allows you to take away the MC rider, it would just means more $ are allocated into buying the funds of your choice and maintaining your high life coverage at the same time.

I hope I'm right, but pls anyone could jump in to correct my understanding if this is wrong.
c.o.o.l
post Jul 20 2009, 10:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
FIrst of all, I would like to confirm with you, is your plan name is Prulink Assurance Plan? If yes the following answer is applicable for you.

1. You can adjust your benefits in your policy. So, you are able to take away the medical benefits. Premium is also adjustable.

2. From your annual limit, I believe you are having PMM3 as your medical card. Which lifetime limit is 3 times of the annual limit. If you plan to switch to AXA, you will need to consider another top up policy for the outpatient treatment.

3. You can also choose to upgrade your medical card from PMM3 to other Prudential newer medical card. Which is
- PMM5 - lifetime limit is 10 times of annual limit
- PruHealth - currently it does not support upgrade from existing plan yet.

4. You can always check with your agent for the amount of cash value/number of units in your policy. We have a system to view this.

5. If you plan to cancel the policy, now is not a good time as the unit price is low after the economy crisis.

If you need anymore explanation on Prudential product, feel free to ask here or PM me.
cenkudu
post Jul 20 2009, 11:28 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,206 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
In my case, my priority is to find medical card for my son as both of the parents have already company medical card. I prefer to have takaful product however still uncertain whether to take the standalone medical card either from MAA Takaful or Takaful Ikhlas OR the medical card attach with the ILP. From what have been explained to me the ILP is like 'savings'. but is it a true saving? because if saving all money that we paid can be withdraw at later stage + the dividen (maybe after 5-7 years).

From what I understand what we pay to this ILP is burn however we might get the return (dividen) at later stage. Maybe after 10 years we might get back the return which equal or less than the amount we already paid. if what I thought is true, this is not a true saving. hope anyone can enlighten me
mtsen
post Jul 20 2009, 11:59 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(cenkudu @ Jul 20 2009, 11:28 AM)
In my case, my priority is to find medical card for my son as both of the parents have already company medical card. I prefer to have takaful product however still uncertain whether to take the standalone medical card either from MAA Takaful or Takaful Ikhlas OR the medical card attach with the ILP. From what have been explained to me the ILP is like 'savings'. but is it a true saving? because if saving all money that we paid can be withdraw at later stage + the dividen (maybe after 5-7 years).

From what I understand what we pay to this ILP is burn however we might get the return (dividen) at later stage. Maybe after 10 years we might get back the return which equal or less than the amount we already paid. if what I thought is true, this is not a true saving. hope anyone can enlighten me
*
your worry is valid, ILP is not a true saving, its an investment. when market goes south, you lost in your investment and may lost so much that your coverage is affected. Like wise, it can go up more than other true saving products like the normal endowment.

one key good thing about ILP is you pay lower fee to the insurance company, ie. 20% vs traditional products at 40%

i believe there are also products like capital guarantee ILP, so you will never get less than your total premium paid if the market is bad when you withdraw, but if the market goes up you can get higher return.

some case studies here

http://malaysiapersonalfinance.blogspot.co...eed-saving.html

and its analysis here

http://malaysiapersonalfinance.blogspot.co...s-not-rate.html

Allianz ?
http://malaysiapersonalfinance.blogspot.co...teed-4-028.html

in ILP, one should choose monthly premium payment, unlike traditional products where annual payment should be choosen
http://malaysiapersonalfinance.blogspot.co...tment-link.html
cenkudu
post Jul 20 2009, 12:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,206 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
TQ for your reply. I was thinking to stick to the priority so just getting the medical card first

mtsen
post Jul 20 2009, 01:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(cenkudu @ Jul 20 2009, 12:39 PM)
TQ for your reply. I was thinking to stick to the priority so just getting the medical card first
*
yes, medical card is one of the most flexible standalone plans that you can change, add at a later date .... unless your health seriously degraded.

I keep mine out of any other plans too. But now during economy down turn and affected, paying the medical plans feel painful sad.gif

do let us know which one you buy eventually and why, thanks !
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 01:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

SCO does not have a sublimit per disability. hence the substancial difference in premium.

c.o.o.l,

from the premium that is allocated to Pru Medical benfits, it's not advisable to upgrade if he can cancel the medical rider. this would be ideal as it's then possible to use this money to buy a medical insurance that does not carry an additional life-time limit. it also frees Optiplex330 from the ILP medical card. wether 10x or 5x annual limit its still a major limit and most will regret this when they are old and stuck with the plan. change now while there still is time wink.gif if the need only exists for outpatient cancer/dialysis there are cheaper plans that serve this purpose. and by cheaper i mean 5x or more.

cenkudu,
do get a standalone medical card that fits the budget. when it comes to medical i would not consider an ILP plan. dont try to kill two birds with one stone here. seperate them.

mtsen,
care to elaborate what you refer to by "one key good thing about ILP is you pay lower fee to the insurance company, ie. 20% vs traditional products at 40%" what do those numbers refer to?

Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 20 2009, 02:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


PM me if you need to learn all about insurance + investment.

I'm from actuarial science background and will be delighted to offer you 2 hours lessons on basic of insurance and basic of investment for FREE! (You can buy me drink if you want to)

However, my location is in KL and subject to availability.

Drop me a message if you want to learn more.
mtsen
post Jul 20 2009, 02:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(Vitorbarbosa @ Jul 20 2009, 02:37 PM)
PM me if you need to learn all about insurance + investment.

I'm from actuarial science background and will be delighted to offer you 2 hours lessons on basic of insurance and basic of investment for FREE! (You can buy me drink if you want to)

However, my location is in KL and subject to availability.

Drop me a message if you want to learn more.
*
serious ? which part of KL ?


Added on July 20, 2009, 2:40 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 01:46 PM)

mtsen,
care to elaborate what you refer to by "one key good thing about ILP is you pay lower fee to the insurance company, ie. 20% vs traditional products at 40%" what do those numbers refer to?
*
first year agent commission in insurance products, it ranges from 10% to 40% for different type of products.

This post has been edited by mtsen: Jul 20 2009, 02:40 PM
numbertwo
post Jul 20 2009, 02:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 01:46 PM)
numbertwo,

SCO does not have a sublimit per disability. hence the substancial difference in premium.

*snipped8

*
PJ,
strange, did you buy this much earlier?

I'm seeing this in their current copy of their brochure .pdf .

Overall Annual Limit
(for Section A and Section B)
PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 PLAN 4
RM500,000 RM200,000 RM100,000 RM50,000
SECTION A IN-PATIENT & DAYCARE SURGICAL PROCEDURE (per disability)
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 20 2009, 02:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Seriously.

Often in Cheras, KL Sentral Area, Damansara, and places around there.


Added on July 20, 2009, 3:11 pmJust read a few pages of this thread.

Seems interesting.

For you guys information, I work in reinsurance company and not aware that there is any standalone CI product out there.

In other words, CI must come with Life, and if you have agent to ask, the CI coverage must not exceed life coverage.(double confirm with them)

Hope that helps.

This post has been edited by Vitorbarbosa: Jul 20 2009, 03:11 PM
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 03:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

you read correctly, the plan lists out per disability. but there are no special sublimits in SCO. inactual fact this even better for you because the limitation on "Total number of days" is per disability. so if you have several unfortunate events in a year, you can in theory be hospitalised 365 days and they still pay. the same holds for the sublimits on
Consultations & Diagnostic Procedures within 31 days before hospital
and
Post Hospitalisation Care and Physiotherapy Treatment within 31 days from hospital discharge
they are per disability and as such are much higher than a plain vanilla annual limit.

i hope this clarifies your question.

Vitorbarbosa,

thanks for the info. i thought so and it's a shame but it does make sense. however CI should be meant to cover for lost income due to CI anyway and not to cover medical bills. this would be almost always (not for AIDS and some others) be the case anyway.

since you are from the industry: is it possible to buy a minimal life insurance (i.e. sum insured 1k) and attach a significant CI plan along (i.e. 500k or higher)? due to the fact of beeing forced with life+CI i have insured myself outside malaysia but one never knows...
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 20 2009, 04:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


PJusa, after reading some of your posts, I find that you are really knowledgeable.

Sadly, that is not possible.(for 1k life + 500k CI).

I never really heard of anyone getting coverage from overseas, as it's hard to do "calculation" for mortality in other countries. I guessed you found a better deal out there and go ahead with it.


PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 04:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Vitorbarbosa,

we used to be covered entirely abroad but premiums dont always work out in out favour. my CI alternative is the result of a brief period in europe. under european law they cant cancel this insurance even if afterwards you move elsewhere. since the original cover was worldwide (and not just EU as normal) we are quite lucky.

for medical insurance its actually easy - even if your malayisan. the only problem is that those plans dont really account for the low low healthcare costs here so the premium seems often prohibitively high esp. in old age.

thanks for the info btw. i figured that i wont be able to trick the insurer that easily wink.gif

mtsen,

i am surprised by your 40% margin. as far as i know there is no higher agent margin than 25% - maybe Vitorbarbosa can elaborate. i always understood that for general insurance the comission is 10 (car), 15 (for example houseowner/-holder, H&S(?)) or 25% (for example PA) depending on the product. if my information on those comissions is wrong, please correct me. if i negotiate with wrong numbers then i am not squeezing my agents hard enough hehe.
numbertwo
post Jul 20 2009, 04:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(Vitorbarbosa @ Jul 20 2009, 02:43 PM)
Seriously.

Often in Cheras, KL Sentral Area, Damansara, and places around there.


Added on July 20, 2009, 3:11 pmJust read a few pages of this thread.

Seems interesting.

For you guys information, I work in reinsurance company and not aware that there is any standalone CI product out there.

In other words, CI must come with Life, and if you have agent to ask, the CI coverage must not exceed life coverage.(double confirm with them)

Hope that helps.
*
AIG Home Assurance does offer standalone CI coverage, up to max of 150K only though.
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 04:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

thanks for the tip. maybe we should start and compile a list of healthcare plans (guranteed / non guaranteed) and top up healthcare plans as well as stand alone CI along with benefits and premiums for all of us to compare. this would be very valuable to any concerned party since it offers unbiased information.

i will check the CI from AIG out - but arent they linked with AIA?
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 20 2009, 04:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


AIG Home Assurance? Means coming with a MRTA? And you called that standalone? Correct me if I'm wrong. I really want to buy one if there is.

PJusa,
I think you are right on the commission on General Insurance. I'm not really familiar in that as I'm in Life Reinsurance but I guess those are the figures.

I think it's quite misleading to say that agents earns 40% commission.

No doubt, for traditional products, which includes standalone medical plan, first year commission can be as high as 40%, but that is first year only. Not every year 40%.

For ILP product, it's as high as 25% first year. Reducing after that. Commission can be collected up to 6 years. Same goes to traditional product.

So, it is highly not advisable to cancel plan as some of the money paid will goes to agents in the first few years.

numbertwo
post Jul 20 2009, 04:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 04:25 PM)
numbertwo,

thanks for the tip. maybe we should start and compile a list of healthcare plans (guranteed / non guaranteed) and top up healthcare plans as well as stand alone CI along with benefits and premiums for all of us to compare. this would be very valuable to any concerned party since it offers unbiased information.

i will check the CI from AIG out - but arent they linked with AIA?
*
errr..I suppose AIG Home (general insurer) and AIA life are two entities but under the same big umbrella? Sorry no idea how their setup locally..

And thanks for your clarification on that AXA's per-disability clause.. good and bad I suppose.. ie. if we need to get hospitalized for the same illness for longer than the period allowed (ie. 150days). On well..


Added on July 20, 2009, 4:45 pm
QUOTE(Vitorbarbosa @ Jul 20 2009, 04:31 PM)
AIG Home Assurance? Means coming with a MRTA? And you called that standalone? Correct me if I'm wrong. I really want to buy one if there is.

*snipped*
*
Do check out with AIG Home Assurance, the product is called SafeSmart - You may purchase either PA, Medical, or CI , or all 3. I have their catalogue with me, handed over from an agent just about 2 months ago. Unless this is withdrawn, else you can 100% get the CI standalone, NOT COMING with MRTA dude.

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Jul 20 2009, 04:45 PM
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 20 2009, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


AIA is seperated from AIG(in the process). But not sure about the general insurance business.

Numbertwo, you did quite a few study also. I tried to look for the plan but couldn't find it in their website.

Where do you heard of it? You know any agent from AIA?


Added on July 20, 2009, 4:46 pmThanks numbertwo!

This post has been edited by Vitorbarbosa: Jul 20 2009, 04:46 PM
samowong
post Jul 20 2009, 05:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Sarawak


QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Jul 18 2009, 08:48 PM)
Wow. You sure know this insurance thing. Thanks.

So now I know Medical card is just a form of general insurance product like car insurance, fire insurance or marine insurance. In that there is no advantage or reward for having stayed with the same insurance company for many years. Find a better offer and jumping ship is the name of the game. You lost nothing.

But can you clarify further what you meant by rider and old age saving thing?

And if I go to AXA, do I have to undergo all the medical examination thing even though I have never made any claim from Prudential?

Much appreciated.
*
Hi Optiplex,

I strongly advise your to discuss with your P's agent and AXA's agent and b4 making the decision. I'm sure u'll find more info and made a well-informed decision after tat. No doubts AXA could offer cheaper premium than Prudential, i am sure there are pro and cons of both plan.NO MEDICAL PLAN is the best unless it suits what you want Considering switching plan from one to another is a bit risky and was not encouraged by Bank Negara unless you really think it is best to switch... do pay attention to the consequence of 30 days risk effective date beside 120 days of waiting period for specific illness, and list of benefits in details.

Basically, medical card can be standalone or attach as a rider to a life policy like investment-linked. Insurance charges for both cards will be charged according to age band regardless of type of card u r holding.

However, bear in mind that must pay the premium promptly at every renewal year, failing to do so make result in lapsation of standalone medical card and thus, if at the time you are so "lucky" to admit hospital... i don think any insurance company would like to honour the claim. Especially we are so used to pay premium yearly via autopayment credit card. Imagine you need to REMEMBER and MAKE SURE you have made the payment EVERY YEAR TILL OLD AGE..and we may have new Credit card no after expiry date....

Taking a medical card rider attached to whole life policy has the advantage if you forgot to pay the premium as long as there are enough cash value to sustain. Usually, there will be a "handsome" sum of cash value in the life policy to sustain the insurance charges after few years of prompt payment. I would consider this as hassle free and buy with a peace of mind.

Of coz, Pjusa has his point also that you can opt to pay only standalone medical card if not bind to whole life policy, especially you don want/cant afford to continue paying the whole-life policy premium. However, do you know u have to option consider to revise / review / reduced the whole life premium when u don want to commit so much in premium and you may have so called "premium holiday" in the life policy????.

Whether standalone or attached rider, there are pros and cons depending on what u want.


Added on July 20, 2009, 5:24 pm
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jul 20 2009, 04:22 PM)
AIG Home Assurance does offer standalone CI coverage, up to max of 150K only though.
*
I think Public Mutual also offer CI coverage to its investor at very cheap premium, but subject to portfolio withdrawal when notice is given ;(

Beside, i think i have come across certain insurer offer CI coverage with very minimal life coverage of RM5K also... worthwhile to explore further.... wink.gif

This post has been edited by samowong: Jul 20 2009, 05:24 PM
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 05:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
samowong,

insurers are "encourages" by bank negara to exercise take-overs. this renders waiting periods to almost zero. my last take-over even go the 30days waiting waived. you must however ask for it. while bank negara encourages it does not enforce this unless you call them or are otherwise vocal wink.gif

i am absolutely certain that bank negare does not discourage switching! this would defy the purpose of an insurance market.

i dont think you need to be scared of missing the premium. first of: where did the money for the holiday come from? from your payments. so affordability is not an issue. you had the money anyway. either you can afford the insurance or you cant. there is no magic way for you to get into a plan you cant afford.

renewal notices are sent 2 months prior to expiry so you have _plenty_ of time. and if you have an agent they will surely remind you.

and i dont follow your argument regarding the ILP part. are you saying u buy an ILP product so you can stop paying after some years and then let the APL do its magic? you are aware that and APL also comes with interest? this strategy makes no sense to me. you should be better off either paying or investing separately.

and forgive but there is one best plan when it comes for medical cover: mandatory insurance that covers all medical bills period. if all are forced to be insured the spread is best. of course if this is handled by a non profit insurance company (i.e. government) then its best. sadly this best plan does not exist (yet). i remember that not too long mandatory health insurance was discussed but the gov didnt go through with it. probably scared people would be angry if have to pay extra and not get anything from it (besides better healthcare that is).
samowong
post Jul 20 2009, 05:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Sarawak


QUOTE(eimira @ Mar 18 2009, 04:13 AM)
i believe im more kiasu than u are!

i have 2 PRU medical cards with lifetime limits totaling to almost rm1 mill
(Pru and Prubsn Takaful)

my wifey and son too...  hehehe
*
Yalor yalor, i got two medic card also... Not kiasu..but kia si !!! hahaha


Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 20 2009, 05:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


The gov was about to launch EPF CI, standalone CI using EPF money but was strongly rejected by MTUC.

Maybe general insurers do offer standalone CI. Life company, I'm not sure.

And make sure they are guaranteed renewal if not, there is no point of getting them.
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 05:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
samowong,

thanks for the tip with public mutual. this is interesting:

http://www.publicmutual.com.my/page.aspx?n...utual-Life-Plus

500k cover for only 2,375.00 RM and it comes with death and TPD but who is complaining. D+TPD should be worth around 400 RM so the 500k for CI is roughly 2000 per annum. will consider this as we wanted to increase death and TPD anyway by 500k. 1M is so little money these days. since this is the only standalone plan so far we can hardly compare prices. it would be interesting to see the premium per 100k CI alone. for now we know Great Eastern (the underwriters) seems to think 400RM per 100k is the price.

looked for AIA CI plan - seems to be only offered to business though. too bad. i wonder if a single unit of public mutual fonds will also be enough to get the insurance.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 20 2009, 06:06 PM
samowong
post Jul 20 2009, 05:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Sarawak


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 05:35 PM)
samowong,

insurers are "encourages" by bank negara to exercise take-overs. this renders waiting periods to almost zero. my last take-over even go the 30days waiting waived. you must however ask for it. while bank negara encourages it does not enforce this unless you call them or are otherwise vocal wink.gif

i am absolutely certain that bank negare does not discourage switching! this would defy the purpose of an insurance market.

i dont think you need to be scared of missing the premium. first of: where did the money for the holiday come from? from your payments. so affordability is not an issue. you had the money anyway. either you can afford the insurance or you cant. there is no magic way for you to get into a plan you cant afford.

renewal notices are sent 2 months prior to expiry so you have _plenty_ of time. and if you have an agent they will surely remind you.

and i dont follow your argument regarding the ILP part. are you saying u buy an ILP product so you can stop paying after some years and then let the APL do its magic? you are aware that and APL also comes with interest? this strategy makes no sense to me. you should be better off either paying or investing separately.

and forgive but there is one best plan when it comes for medical cover: mandatory insurance that covers all medical bills period. if all are forced to be insured the spread is best. of course if this is handled by a non profit insurance company (i.e. government) then its best. sadly this best plan does not exist (yet). i remember that not too long mandatory health insurance was discussed but the gov didnt go through with it. probably scared people would be angry if have to pay extra and not get anything from it (besides better healthcare that is).
*
Hi Pjusa,
As far as i know, ILP does not incurred interest like Traditional life policy does. Furthermore, ILP charges insurance charges only (NOT PREMIUM) thru unit deduction. Personally, I have not been paying premium for nearly 2 years after 2.5 years of prompt payment, but my policy still inforced with covered medical and there is no APL accrued in my ILP statement. Furthermore, i wont be surprised if some may overlook it or some may even dont bother to read all the junk mail sent by insurance company. Haha.. Pjusa, u sound very well-versed in medical insurance especially oversea healthcare...mind share your profession ?? hmm.gif (No obligation ya!)

By the way, if you happen to encounter "the best plan" in future, pls share with us! But mandatory insurance that covers all medical bills period may look rather impossible to me in view of escalating medical cost...


Added on July 20, 2009, 6:03 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 05:40 PM)
samowong,

thanks for the tip with public mutual. this is interesting:

http://www.publicmutual.com.my/page.aspx?n...utual-Life-Plus

500k cover for only 2,375.00 RM and it comes with death and TPD but who is complaining. will consider this as we wanted to increase death and TPD anyway by 500k. 1M is so little money these days.

looked for AIA CI plan - seems to be only offered to business though. too bad. i wonder if a single unit of public mutual fonds will also be enough to get the insurance.
*
Pjusa,

I think the Public Mutual offer is term insurance...so would it be too expensive to pay RM2375 yearly for a RM500K ?? Good about this is the premium is level for all age band especially for elderly b4 60. But the sackback is on the guarantee renewal issue.... hmm.gif

samowong

This post has been edited by samowong: Jul 20 2009, 06:03 PM
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 06:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
samowong,

thanks for the info. i didnt know about unit deduction option. but this only means you dont pay the interest. good though but it sounds a tad impractical to me. but then others might be less inclined to handle their bills. i take the annual renewal as an option to evaluate cover and compare prices and alternatives to make sure we have what suits us best among the current offers.

and yes the public mutual sounds like a term insurance to me as well. to me its still interesting because it allows us to compare. 2000 RM for 500k is still costly (CI only) albeit intersting - depends as always on your needs. and the renewal guarantee issue is definitely a minus.

oh and regarding the best plan. actually i think its especially viable in escalting cost environments. consider this: noone pays any bill but it's all charged to one centralised insurance. not only is the risk spread optimal for the entire population (not so much ideal for low risk ppl) but it also provides a massive negotiating power. discounts are immanent. if hospitals wont budge, the monopoly insurer might just open its own to operate at cost. but they would have be non-profit base if the insurer is in for profit, the system wont work. i dont think this ideal insurance exists, to some degree it does exist in europe but too many exits for the rich remain. ideally premium would be a percentage of your income so it hurts people equally in comparison to the money they have. this means cross subsidy but its better than having high premiums who hurt the poor a lot and rich only feel a tickle.

oh and i am not that well informed - many things yet to learn. i am not really related to the business so i only learn from the contracts and proposals i get. i am an economist by the way. so the macro-view might be better than the micro-view of things wink.gif
numbertwo
post Jul 20 2009, 06:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


PMlife plus2..few things to bear in mind..
1) Group term life as you may have known now..So, question is, will group term life having higher risk of withdrawal?

2) non guaranteed premium, of course.. It has a history of premium increase.. (ie. the 200K plan was increased from 700+ to the 950 now, just happened about 2-3 years back if i remember right)

3) you need to have a 10x unit trust value equivalent to the premium in order to puchase the plan. (ie. RM4750 worth of unit trusts to purchase 100K plan1; RM9500 worth of UT to purchase 200K plan)


Added on July 20, 2009, 6:41 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 05:40 PM)

*cut*

looked for AIA CI plan - seems to be only offered to business though. too bad. i wonder if a single unit of public mutual fonds will also be enough to get the insurance.
*
did you call AIA or AIG HOme? u may try call 1800-8888-11 to check on 'SafeSmart' 36CI plan..

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Jul 20 2009, 06:41 PM
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 07:47 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
PMlife looks less appealing and it doesnt get better sad.gif well worth a look nonetheless. i dont think group insurance is per se more likely to withdrawal. you usually tend to get a better pack than as a direct customer due to purchasing power exercised. for example i previously had a plan at roughly the same cost with an official plan under life time limit but the main benefit was that unlike the regular life time limit the group plan had unlimited life & annual limit.

as per AIG i checked AIG general insurance. do you have a URL for AIG Home? as far as i know American Home Assurance is taken over by AIG general now. my sentiment is its AIG - i dont really trust them too much.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 20 2009, 07:52 PM
cenkudu
post Jul 20 2009, 10:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,206 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 01:46 PM)

cenkudu,
do get a standalone medical card that fits the budget. when it comes to medical i would not consider an ILP plan. dont try to kill two birds with one stone here. seperate them.
just wonder why we need to separate between medical and ILP. Is it because ILP medical card normally have less benefit compare to standalone card? OR if we need to cancel the medical we have also to quit ILP?
PJusa
post Jul 20 2009, 11:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
cenkudu,

in a nutshell for both reasons. you seem to get less benefits per dollar premium paid (not surprising) and you are bound stronger due to the ILP part. you cant really benefit from ILP + rider in comparison to pure medical insurance if you leave the ease of using the investment to pay for the premium out wink.gif i think overall you are getting more bang for your buck from a standalone policy alongside with all the plus and minus we have listed out previously.
numbertwo
post Jul 20 2009, 11:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


Hi ,
the only URL that has this save&smart plan is here : http://www.aam.org.my/insurance/insurance_safe.asp (scroll to the bottom to see the CI plan), what you see here is exactly what I see from the catalogue on my table.... I can't find this plan in AIG website though..

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Jul 20 2009, 11:24 PM
raph
post Jul 21 2009, 02:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jul 20 2009, 11:22 PM)
Hi ,
the only URL that has this save&smart plan is here : http://www.aam.org.my/insurance/insurance_safe.asp (scroll to the bottom to see the CI plan), what you see here is exactly what I see from the catalogue on my table.... I can't find this plan in AIG website though..
*
maybe you can try this http://www.aig.com.my/AHAWebsite/info.jsp?id=320
if i have time I'll check the plan for u
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 21 2009, 08:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Browsed through the AAM website.

It's a good plan, except that it's only up to age 65. Nevertheless, it's far cheaper compare to any CI plan.

However, still do not know the t&c of the plan.


PJusa
post Jul 21 2009, 08:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
raph,

seems the same. but the AIG one is for business only sad.gif
mtsen
post Jul 21 2009, 12:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


yes I used to pay RM 1,800 for Public Mutual Life+CI covers, now its RM 2,375

and yes, I have no agent to scold, every time I want to feedback ( release tension ), big companies who take my calls will say if I am not dead and don't have heart attack, then there is nothing else to do smile.gif

... thats group term insurance ... I have been having this plan for more than 10 years now. If anyone found a similar but more cost effective choice, do PM me. I want to change too smile.gif

Public Mutual's Medical Plan is RM 1,156 for the whole family, covering father, mother and all the kids. Damn cheap but terribly under feature. I am thinking to buy one just to cover everybody, then buy extra standalone plans as and when needed ....


Added on July 21, 2009, 12:41 pm
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jul 20 2009, 11:22 PM)
Hi ,
the only URL that has this save&smart plan is here : http://www.aam.org.my/insurance/insurance_safe.asp (scroll to the bottom to see the CI plan), what you see here is exactly what I see from the catalogue on my table.... I can't find this plan in AIG website though..
*
looks like This one is not a medical plan, not the normal hospital and surgical plans, this one is more like supplementing with extra income during problems, if that is correct then the premium isn't exactly cheap.

The CI part is interesting only for those below age 46 ...

this is like a group term insurance so AIG will not sell it direct, u go through AAM.


Added on July 21, 2009, 12:47 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 20 2009, 04:25 PM)
numbertwo,

thanks for the tip. maybe we should start and compile a list of healthcare plans (guranteed / non guaranteed) and top up healthcare plans as well as stand alone CI along with benefits and premiums for all of us to compare. this would be very valuable to any concerned party since it offers unbiased information.

i will check the CI from AIG out - but arent they linked with AIA?
*
Yes, the comparison list will be very useful !! but I would seperate out CI and H&S.

I thought there is already a comparative list of all H&S plans in the market in this forum, but after searching for a while I couldn't find any ....

This post has been edited by mtsen: Jul 21 2009, 12:47 PM
PJusa
post Jul 21 2009, 01:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen,

i agree we should split it. CI is different from H&S. H&S should also be grouped: guaranteed / non-guaranteed and then split again in categories:

insurable until 65-70

insurable until 71-80

insurable above 81

we could list benefits, premium shedule and pros and cons of each plan. this would allow better comparison.
numbertwo
post Jul 21 2009, 02:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


I wonder why all of you don't believe the AIG's 36CI is good for individual too, did anyone even make an effort to call AIG? I got the form from the agent and I'm not associating myself with my co. either... So, it's definately good for individual.
PJusa
post Jul 21 2009, 03:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

basically since the plan is only listed under the business section. but if they dont mind to insure individual then that is good. do you have the premium shedule & T&Cs?
numbertwo
post Jul 21 2009, 03:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


The one listed under 'business', I'm not even sure that's plan I'm talking about.. I've just called AIG with the number posted in my previous link, 'Save&Smart' plan is opened for individual, premium on yearly only and you can view the premium bands on the AAM website. Sorry I don't have any detailed T&C except what you see in the AAM website because I've yet to purchase.

More FAQs are here:
http://www.aam.org.my/insurance/insurance_safeFAQ2.asp

Sorry guys, that's all I can help.
raph
post Jul 21 2009, 03:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 21 2009, 08:53 AM)
raph,

seems the same. but the AIG one is for business only sad.gif
*
yup, but you can try AIG's safe & smart which design for individual (according to my branch manager) or you also can try AIA's critical illness shield
which is a stand alone plan for individual. can u give me your email so that i can send to u a specimen contract of critical illness shield?

QUOTE(mtsen @ Jul 21 2009, 12:31 PM)
yes I used to pay RM 1,800 for Public Mutual Life+CI covers, now its RM 2,375

and yes, I have no agent to scold, every time I want to feedback ( release tension ), big companies who take my calls will say if I am not dead and don't have heart attack, then there is nothing else to do smile.gif

... thats group term insurance ...  I have been having this plan for more than 10 years now.  If anyone found a similar but more cost effective choice, do PM me.  I want to change too smile.gif

Public Mutual's Medical Plan is RM 1,156 for the whole family, covering father, mother and all the kids.  Damn cheap but terribly under feature.  I am thinking to buy one just to cover everybody, then buy extra standalone plans as and when needed ....
with RM2034 AIA provide medical plan for whole family which R&B150 (120 days), annual limit RM22,000 and lifetime RM300,000
but with RM 2652, AIA u can have additional feature which include unlimited lifetime limit.

can u give your email so that i can send to you the table of benefit?

QUOTE(numbertwo @ Jul 21 2009, 03:12 PM)
The one listed under 'business', I'm not even sure that's plan I'm talking about..  I've just called AIG with the number posted in my previous link, 'Save&Smart' plan is opened for individual, premium on yearly only and you can view the premium bands on the AAM website.  Sorry I don't have any detailed T&C except what you see in the AAM website because I've yet to purchase.

More FAQs are here:
http://www.aam.org.my/insurance/insurance_safeFAQ2.asp

Sorry guys, that's all I can help.
*
yes, the safe & smart is provided by AIG.

edit: grammar

This post has been edited by raph: Jul 21 2009, 03:31 PM
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 21 2009, 04:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


I believe it's available.

Just from my experience in life insurance(aware, not general insurance), general insurance they do not have actuaries to calculate the premium.

So, basically their premium is based on past experience.

IOne thing is, the premium is not guaranteed. Means, they can raise the premium and this is a yearly renewal product(with guaranteed renewal of course) and you have no choice but to pay or the policy cancelled.

Coverage attached to Life insurance is premium guaranteed (not on all plans), means the premium will be at that amount until maybe age 87, 99, or 100 depending on company.
PJusa
post Jul 21 2009, 04:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Vitorbarbosa,

i'm quite certain that no general insurer is basing their premiums on past experience alone. that would be very bad business practise. risk assesment is a highly complex thing that eventually leads to premiums - tons of statistical averages from various groups as well as econometric projections will flow into the general structure. this also holds for future adjustments. into the adjustments also the claims history will flow in but from what i know the claims history is more or less an adjustment factor only unless your group is very small. in such a case the claims history becomes progressively more important and overshadows other factors. in a broadly spread product with several 10s of thousands or more insured many other factors help significantly better setting future premiums.

this is most likely the same as it is done for life insurance - with actuaries, statisticians and the like.

life insurance cannot adjust if the premium is guaranteed and will have to factor in claims as an estimation only. also all of the other factors can not be adjusted and need to estimated far into the future. the result is more uncertain numbers and this usually leads to higher premiums than with general insurance since nobody wants to underestimate and consequentially suffer a loss.

based on this logic premiums guaranteed should on average be higher than with general insurance as those are based upon harder figures and allow for a more competive pricing strategy.

but it's true. fixed premium has an advantage - you know what you will have to pay. even though you should also assume you are paying more than you would with a broadly spread general insurance product.


Added on July 21, 2009, 5:04 pmraph,

can you post the CI and also the entire health plan for all of us? the website is very silent about details and it would help us all to evaluate options.

thanks!

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 21 2009, 05:04 PM
raph
post Jul 22 2009, 10:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
ok this one is benefit of AIA critical illness shield. the safe & smart u can refer to AAM website.

thanksAttached Image
raph
post Jul 22 2009, 10:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
since this thread also for medical, i post the benefit of new medical plan from AIA. enjoy!!


Attached File  MCP_table_of_benefit.pdf ( 49.84k ) Number of downloads: 72

Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 22 2009, 11:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Very true PJusa.

You pay more to life insurance company now compared to general insurance.


Added on July 22, 2009, 11:08 amBtw, they are basing on past experience on different age band. I can't tell you excatly how they are doing it but that's what I learnt from my seniors.



This post has been edited by Vitorbarbosa: Jul 22 2009, 11:08 AM
PJusa
post Jul 22 2009, 11:39 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
raph,

benefits are not too bad. care to share the policy jacket and premium schedule too?

Vitorbarbosa,

i am sure they are basing also on experience and age band. i would be surprised though if that is the sole base. i know that for example AXA is offering the same policies throughout asia with slight modifications. their risk assesment is done partially by the local branches and partially by the asia HQ. they probably also take into account the overall data they have collected. if i would be an insurer i'd get as much information base as possible and then cook it all up using the local claims and local differences as adjustment factors. and if i can think of it... mni insurer surely also can wink.gif
raph
post Jul 22 2009, 12:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 22 2009, 11:39 AM)
raph,

benefits are not too bad. care to share the policy jacket and premium schedule too?
this is the specimen contract (just knew that this forum can attached file tongue.gif )

Attached File  CI_Shield_specimen_contract.pdf ( 604.93k ) Number of downloads: 46


edit: i dun have a softcopy of premium schedule but i'll try my best

This post has been edited by raph: Jul 22 2009, 12:26 PM
mtsen
post Jul 22 2009, 02:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


After following this thread for a while, I also am looking for upgrades on H&S / medical now smile.gif

For CI, I am still happy with the rate of Public Mutual Life Plus 2. RM 2375 for 500k upon death, tpd or ci. If anyone has one that is more cost effective than that or equivalent, please do let me know. I have been thinking to change long ago but couldn't get a better alternative.

For my recent H&S needs, I have got quotes from eIns(Allianz?), Prudential, Public Mutual, Pacific Insurance Medi Pac, InsOnline. My general findings are as follow.

Public Mutual has the cheapest plan especially the family package but coverage is low and even there are limits on surgical/anaesthetist, transplant etc. like those 20 years ago plans. $1,156 cover both parents and all kids for annual limit 125k.

Prudential is the most expensive, ie. $1,470 for myself alone 150k annual limit. but it seems like the easiest to understand coz no complicated limits or rules.

eInsuran(allianz?) has the best plan for male, $751.20 for 150k annual limit. features quite typically ok.

InsuraneOnline has the best plan for female, $815 to cover 120k annual limit. co-insurance 10% sad.gif

I am sure this is not the verdict yet. This has to be one of the toughest personal finance journey I am walking through now .... but the 1st part is done, check out below link to see how a Malaysian would probably die ...

http://malaysiapersonalfinance.blogspot.co...-would-die.html

In short, ~50% chance is that your Heart or Lung will fail you. Then ~20% may be your cell will mutate and lastly if you have Health on your side, then you may be crashed on a road accident (5%).

This post has been edited by mtsen: Jul 22 2009, 02:48 PM
PJusa
post Jul 22 2009, 03:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
i am in the process of compiling a list of all H&S plans available. this is complicated but worth the effors. if you have a plan's details plase notify me or even better send me the schedule. eventually we might be abe to even add all premiums so one can truely compare.
as of now i am done with axa general plan. allianz is next.
numbertwo
post Jul 22 2009, 03:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


reason why Pru is expensive is perhaps their medic card is always attached to a life policy?!

when we are comparing H&S plans, is better to put the Big guys (aia, pru, ge, ? who else) at one side , their Med card is usually at a premium.

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Jul 22 2009, 03:43 PM
c.o.o.l
post Jul 22 2009, 04:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Also new PRUHealth insurance charges is abit higher than the previous PMM5 due to the NCB thingy.
However, if you do not make claim on the year, it will be worth of it.
PRUHealth is not good for people who always make claim compare to the old PMM5.
mtsen
post Jul 22 2009, 10:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 22 2009, 03:23 PM)
i am in the process of compiling a list of all H&S plans available. this is complicated but worth the effors. if you have a plan's details plase notify me or even better send me the schedule. eventually we might be abe to even add all premiums so one can truely compare.
as of now i am done with axa general plan. allianz is next.
*
I just get quote from AXA, straight away move up to my top choice now smile.gif

what details do you want to collect ? to avoid myself getting dizzy, I only focus on these now ...

annual limit,
no or less co-insurance, or ease of calculation
less limits, less rules on claims
PJusa
post Jul 23 2009, 08:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
i am collecting limits, sublimits if any, deductables, co-insurance, renewal conditions, benefits, outpatient benefits and special benefits at the moment.

i found a plan from tmasialife but no details online: Asia Health Partner Excel - if anyone has information, please send to me.

i am also considering adding the premiums but havent done so yet.

and yes - i was surprised about axa as well when i first got the schedule. its impressive - furthermore they managed to keep premiums stable from 2006-2009 - only just now slight increases but what is best is the upgraded room and board condition. they added room categories: if you remain in the same category, the 20% coninsurance clause does not apply - nice one.
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 24 2009, 09:30 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(c.o.o.l @ Jul 20 2009, 10:51 AM)
FIrst of all, I would like to confirm with you, is your plan name is Prulink Assurance Plan? If yes the following answer is applicable for you.

1. You can adjust your benefits in your policy. So, you are able to take away the medical benefits. Premium is also adjustable.

2. From your annual limit, I believe you are having PMM3 as your medical card. Which lifetime limit is 3 times of the annual limit. If you plan to switch to AXA, you will need to consider another top up policy for the outpatient treatment.

3. You can also choose to upgrade your medical card from PMM3 to other Prudential newer medical card. Which is
- PMM5 - lifetime limit is 10 times of annual limit
- PruHealth - currently it does not support upgrade from existing plan yet.

4. You can always check with your agent for the amount of cash value/number of units in your policy. We have a system to view this.

5. If you plan to cancel the policy, now is not a good time as the unit price is low after the economy crisis.

If you need anymore explanation on Prudential product, feel free to ask here or PM me.
*
Just came back from travel. Thanks for all the very informative info you people are giving me.

I checked my policy. It consists of:
1. PRUdisability
2. PRUmajor med benefit - PMM200
3. PRUlink assurance ac

Annual limit is RM75K
Lifetime is RM225K

What advise would you people suggest?

To recap. I was offered AXA that only have an annual limit but NO lifetime limit. Should I switch?

Many thanks again. And btw, I am much older than you fellow assume I am sad.gif

This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jul 24 2009, 09:32 AM
PJusa
post Jul 24 2009, 11:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
if you are only looking for H&S you are better of with the AXA plan. if you want disability, you can also add this outside as a standalone.
mtsen
post Jul 24 2009, 11:40 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Jul 24 2009, 09:30 AM)
Just came back from travel. Thanks for all the very informative info you people are giving me.

I checked my policy. It consists of:
1. PRUdisability
2. PRUmajor med benefit - PMM200
3. PRUlink assurance ac

Annual limit is RM75K
Lifetime is RM225K

What advise would you people suggest?

To recap. I was offered AXA that only have an annual limit but NO lifetime limit. Should I switch?

Many thanks again. And btw, I am much older than you fellow assume I am  sad.gif
*
normal advice would be dun switch, but you can top it up or 'add'. since ur current policy if whole life 100 yo, then u can top up AXA for 5-10-15 years where the premium is cheap and cover u up to 40-55 only, should anything happen after that, then ur current policy can still help a bit ...

at least thats my strategy when budget is a concern but still want higher coverage during some 'prime' years ...
PJusa
post Jul 24 2009, 03:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
keeping it as a top up is a good thing also. if its one or the other i would switch.


Added on July 24, 2009, 3:44 pmdoes anyone have the entire premium schedule for AIA ExcelCare Plus?


Added on July 24, 2009, 3:44 pmalso i need the schedule for AXA SmartCare Executive

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 24 2009, 03:44 PM
numbertwo
post Jul 24 2009, 04:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 24 2009, 03:41 PM)
keeping it as a top up is a good thing also. if its one or the other i would switch.


Added on July 24, 2009, 3:44 pmdoes anyone have the entire premium schedule for AIA ExcelCare Plus?


Added on July 24, 2009, 3:44 pmalso i need the schedule for AXA SmartCare Executive
*
....My Co. paid the SCE .., so I'm waiting for AXA to quote me SCO (as a top-up). I heard AXA has jusst change their coverage/premium this year (May?)
raph
post Jul 25 2009, 02:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 24 2009, 03:41 PM)


Added on July 24, 2009, 3:44 pmdoes anyone have the entire premium schedule for AIA ExcelCare Plus?

Attached File  ECP_premium_schedule.pdf ( 74.56k ) Number of downloads: 101


Attached File  MCP_premium_schedule.pdf ( 129.83k ) Number of downloads: 87


for those who want to purchase safe&smart, please be informed that the monthly mode of payment will no longer be available

thanks
PJusa
post Jul 25 2009, 04:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

yes axa revised premiums just recently. minor increases - stable premium from 2006 - 2009. that is quite decent.


Added on July 25, 2009, 4:10 pmthanks raph,

will add this to the list. if i use the max. plan it's a bomb if and when i exceed 80 - how to pay 40k per annum for medical wink.gif ?

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 25 2009, 04:10 PM
raph
post Jul 25 2009, 09:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 25 2009, 04:06 PM)


Added on July 25, 2009, 4:10 pmthanks raph,

will add this to the list. if i use the max. plan it's a bomb if and when i exceed 80 - how to pay 40k per annum for medical wink.gif ?
hahah thats true, thats why they advise to buy a medical plan and attach it with investment-link and purchased it since young age.
and what about the other insurer's premium? is there a lot of different?


mtsen
post Jul 25 2009, 09:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(raph @ Jul 25 2009, 09:27 PM)
hahah thats true, thats why they advise to buy a medical plan and attach it with investment-link and purchased it since young age.
and what about the other insurer's premium? is there a lot of different?
*
no difference really, u still pay the 40k biggrin.gif
raph
post Jul 25 2009, 09:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(mtsen @ Jul 25 2009, 09:37 PM)
no difference really, u still pay the 40k biggrin.gif
*
yes that rite, but it come from your accumulation value not from your cash at that time.

edit: grammar

This post has been edited by raph: Jul 25 2009, 09:51 PM
mtsen
post Jul 25 2009, 10:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


yes, accumulation could be positive or negative, so may need to pay 50k also biggrin.gif
PJusa
post Jul 26 2009, 11:46 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
very very true. which is why we employ a medical budget of 1k per month for the family and save the balance. but seriously at age 80 i can get away with a better cover for under 10k. just waiting for all plans to come up with serious 100yr plan i.e without lifetime limit and reasonable annual limit. anything below 250k wont be worth it in 30 yrs.
raph
post Jul 26 2009, 04:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 26 2009, 11:46 AM)
very very true. which is why we employ a medical budget of 1k per month for the family and save the balance. but seriously at age 80 i can get away with a better cover for under 10k. just waiting for all plans to come up with serious 100yr plan i.e without lifetime limit and reasonable annual limit. anything below 250k wont be worth it in 30 yrs.
*
why dont u also put here some of your research so that it can benefit others?


PJusa
post Jul 26 2009, 04:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
i will post the findings. i am still in the process of getting every single plan in an excel spreadsheet. it's a lot of work to do in my (rare) spare time. so far i have 24 different healthplans with all subplans in comparison. that means all major features and added features can be easily compared. also all current premiums are listed and you can poll them for specific ages, genders and age bands - even averaging out the annual premium for a specified range. once i am through with the insurances i will have to look at the banks also. i think one or two weeks time and i will be through. 5 insurers to go and then the banks. also some plans i cant get any decent information - have emailed a few insurers but interestngly enough they seem to indifferent towards email inquiries. have only received feedback from manulife. instead of sending what i asked for an agent calls me sad.gif well such is life.


Added on July 26, 2009, 4:44 pmfor age 80 - rates differ. assuming annual limit 100k you can get: (i dont have the schedule of benefits for AIA plans yet - want to share?)

- AXA SCO
M: 3285
F: 3271

- Allianz EB Medishield
M: 6822
F: 5636,4

- Kurnia MediGuard Senior (110k limit)
M/F: 6334

- MAA Medicalife 207
M/F: 4371

all the other plans dont offer age 80. but the prices vary a lot. if you look at average premiums from age 1-80 for the various plans you will that they also vary from around 1000 (AXA) to 1700 (Allianz) MAA is in the middle with 1500. that is a huge difference in assesment and tells you pretty nicely in todays terms what you are expected to pay for cover throughout the years. of course inflation will increase those numbers but its a good indicator.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 26 2009, 04:44 PM
raph
post Jul 26 2009, 04:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 26 2009, 04:36 PM)



Added on July 26, 2009, 4:44 pmfor age 80 - rates differ. assuming annual limit 100k you can get: (i dont have the schedule of benefits for AIA plans yet - want to share?)

QUOTE(raph @ Jul 22 2009, 10:55 AM)
since this thread also for medical, i post the benefit of new medical plan from AIA. enjoy!!
Attached File  MCP_table_of_benefit.pdf ( 49.84k ) Number of downloads: 72

*
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 26 2009, 04:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


PJusa, I guessed premiums are not guaranteed for medical coverage.
raph
post Jul 26 2009, 05:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Vitorbarbosa @ Jul 26 2009, 04:58 PM)
PJusa, I guessed premiums are not guaranteed for medical coverage.
*
agree, i depend on several factor such as medical inflation
PJusa
post Jul 26 2009, 06:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
of course premiums are not guaranteed. but if you want to do an actual comparison you can compare todays overall premiums due for a given preriod - say 30 yrs - with others. this evens out spikes and gives you a good idea at the cost for an annual coverage of 100k in this example. one can assume that medical inflation will be roughly the same over time so premiums will increase roughly in tandem across board.
miki c
post Jul 29 2009, 06:56 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Hi

I'm not sure which insurance company medical card to sign up...any ideas ?


Added on July 29, 2009, 7:01 pmMay i know which insurance company is good in medical card?Easy to claim....and i heard that some insurance company revise the next year premium up to 20% after a big claim this year....Anyone heard about it?

Between ING and Prudential...which 1 is better?Any ideas?

This post has been edited by miki c: Jul 29 2009, 07:01 PM
PJusa
post Jul 29 2009, 07:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
miki c,

the answer to which company should you choose depends on many factors (age, desired duration of insurance, coverage, desired extra covers). let us know what you want first and how much you can pay for it.

some companies do not offer guaranteed and loading free renewals. they might impose a much higher premium for the future after a big claim on a personal basis. good insurance companies do not impose any individual loading but only on portfolio basis. look for insurances that guarantees renewal without individual loading or exclusions.

i checked PRU today. their plans are all riders attached to life. not worth considering in my opinion. so ING with a standalone would be preferable.

but there are many many plans available. no need to limit yourself to ING and PRU.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Jul 30 2009, 08:46 AM
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 29 2009, 10:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


How about Great Eastern standalone medical?

I have their premium schedule, if you need them.
PJusa
post Jul 29 2009, 11:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Vitorbarbosa,

i am interested in all - will gladly add the plan. do you have the schedule of benefits too?
miki c
post Jul 30 2009, 12:13 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
wow...so many plans dere...Ehmm, wat i wan is mainly medical card...
i prefer medical card attached in investment plan coz it still can be added in riders such as payor waiver and hospital income....somemore, the premium wont be increased when my age grow.....Ehmm...preferred premium is ard RM150 or below that....


As i know, there is no co-insurance for ING but the highest lifetime limit is RM540k only....while Prudential, there is the co-insurance with lifetime limit up to 1 mil.......I compare these 2 companys coz i read its medical card leaflet b4...


ChinHong86
post Jul 30 2009, 12:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,116 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: SP,KL


QUOTE(miki c @ Jul 30 2009, 01:13 AM)
wow...so many plans dere...Ehmm, wat i wan is mainly medical card...
i prefer medical card attached in investment plan coz it still can be added in riders such as payor waiver and hospital income....somemore, the premium wont be increased when my age grow.....Ehmm...preferred premium is ard RM150 or below that....
As i know, there is no co-insurance for ING but the highest lifetime limit  is RM540k only....while Prudential, there is the co-insurance with lifetime limit up to 1 mil.......I compare these 2 companys coz i read its medical card leaflet b4...
*
may i noe who u wanna insure?
u urself or ur child?
are u aware of AIA medical card?
we have no lifetime limit and coverage up to age 100
PJusa
post Jul 30 2009, 08:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
miki c,

yes there are tons of plans around and they are all medical card stand alones. i strongly discourage you from taking a health insurance attached as a rider - at least as your only health insurance. read the thread to find out why smile.gif basically it's in your own best interest to choose a standalone insurance.

also note that the medical rider premium is almost always _NOT_ fixed but will increase with age. if it is fixed, the premium you pay will be much much higher than with a standalone. this also has been discussed before.

just to make your life easy there are far better plans around for your budget of 1800 p.a. - you can have 500k annual without co-insurance and lifetime limit for 1000 p.a. @ 33. give me your priorities and age range and i can look through the plans for you. if you say your maximum annual premium is 1800 even in old age (did you adjust for inflation?) i can also look what cover you can get for that price. if you say your AVERAGE premium ofer time is max. 1800 then you can get the best plans around to be frank. no need to limit yourself to lifetime limits and such.


Added on July 30, 2009, 8:49 amQuick update: now covering 33 plans:

1) AXA SmartCare Optimum
2) AXA SmartCare Executive
3) Allianz EB MediShield Plus
4) Allianz Care Individual
5) Sihat Malaysia
6) AIA ExcelCare Plus
7) MSIG Healthcare International Insurance
8) Berjaya Sompo B.Health Net
9) Berjaya Sompo B.Health Major
10)Berjaya Sompo B-Rawat
11)Berjaya Sompo ANAK
12) ING MediPlus
13) Kurnia: MediGuard Value
14) Kurnia: MediGuard Premier
15) Kurnia: MediGuard Junior
16) Kurnia: MediGuard Grads
17) Kurnia: MediGuard Senior
18) Lonpac Insurance Bhd: Care Plus
19) MAA MedicaLife 207
20) MAA MedicaGen 200
21) MUI Continental Insurance Bhd HOSPITALISATION & SURGICAL POLICY
22) Multi-Purpose Insurans Bhd: Multi Medical Protector
23) Multi-Purpose Insurans Bhd: Multi Medi-Plus
24) Overseas Assurance Corp. (M) Bhd: OAC Easi-Health
25) Pacific Insurance Bhd. : medipac
26) Pacific Insurance Bhd. : medi-major
27) Tokio Marine Insurans (M) Bhd: Medic Partner
28) Tokio Marine Insurans (M) Bhd: Medic Plus
29) Tokio Marine Insurans (M) Bhd: Premier Medic Partner
30) RHB : MediSure
31) UOB BANCASSURANCE : Ideal Care
32) MAA Takaful SmartMedic 100
33) IKHLAS Medic Assist Takaful
34) Manulife: Manucare100
35) Malaysia Insurance Online: Medical and Hospitalisation Plan
36) Prudential: pruHealth

This post has been edited by PJusa: Aug 11 2009, 07:02 PM
miki c
post Jul 30 2009, 11:06 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
The ING medical card that i mentioned is not 540 annual limit....while is RM180k annual limit and RM540k lifetime limit....

Prudential is RM100k annual limit and RM1mil lifetime limit....

Ehmm...my age is 25, occupation class 1, female....so ard RM150 monthly premium, which package can get wif this price..?I wan medical card, payor waiver and hospital income....coz in case hit by any 36 illness, i still can having this medical card....this is wat i think lor....

By the way, i never consider about AIA medical card.....Ehmm...i'm not sure any good plan from AIA?
mtsen
post Jul 30 2009, 11:27 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(miki c @ Jul 30 2009, 11:06 AM)
The ING medical card that i mentioned is not 540 annual limit....while is RM180k annual limit and RM540k lifetime limit....

Prudential is RM100k annual limit and RM1mil lifetime limit....

Ehmm...my age is 25, occupation class 1, female....so ard RM150 monthly premium, which package can get wif this price..?I wan medical card, payor waiver and hospital income....coz in case hit by any 36 illness, i still can having this medical card....this is wat i think lor....

By the way, i never consider about AIA medical card.....Ehmm...i'm not sure any good plan from AIA?
*
seem like you need a complete plan, lady specific plan is better.

by the way you are asking, I think you need an agent. I only know ING in Kepong and Prudential in Taipan, whom I may pass ur contact to.

if you still want to find a plan that is self serve, cost effective, thru internet etc. Then you may think about Buy Term Invest The Rest concept

this site has some term plans I think ...



PJusa
post Jul 30 2009, 11:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
miki c,

i agree with your resentement against AIA. i share the feeling. that beeing said i understand that your budget is 1800 p.a.

i suggest you split your insurance cover i.e. get a seperate H&S insurance and then use the remaining insurance cover you want either through a life + CI + payor waiver + hospital income plan. otherwise you will be paying a high premium for a low cover. you might even want to consider a standalone CI plan or just a PA plan with hospital income. in my opinion those added benefits dont really justify the premium you pay. i give you an example. if you look at 150-250k annual limit you can get the following plans with the _annual_ (not monthly!) premium at age 25, female in brackets. i am only looking at guaranteed renewable plans. if you want non-guaranteed let me know. of course you should also compare all the features of those plans.

1) AXA SmartCare Optimum, 200k limit, no lifetime (509)
2) Allianz EB MediShield Plus, 150k limit, 1,5M lifetime (1064,40)
3) Allianz Care Individual, 125k limit, 375 lifetime (838)
4) AIA ExcelCare Plus, 140k limit, 500k lifetime (787,50)
5) Kurnia MediGuard Premier, 150k limit, 450lifetime (971)
6) MAA MedicaLife 207, 150k limit, 450 lifetime (803)
7) Multi-Purpose Insurans Bhd Multi Medi-Plus, 120k limit, 360 life (800)
8) Pacific Insurance Bhd. medipac, 100k limit, 400k lifetime (735)
9) Tokio Marine Insurans (M) Bhd Premier Medic Partner
, 120k limit, 500k lifetime (809)
10) RHB Bank Medisure 150k limit, 450k lifetime (765)
11) MAA Takaful SmartMedic 100, 150k limit, 450k lifetime (536)

now you have around 1k left to get a decent CI cover that allows you to pay for H&S.

i hope this helped you a bit. i am not sure if ING is guaranteed renewal or not. so its not in the list. prudential is a rider so its not in the list either. also dont forgot: when you are older, its hard to upgrade plans. only downgrading can be done easily.
mtsen
post Jul 30 2009, 11:39 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(PJusa @ Jul 30 2009, 08:36 AM)
miki c,

yes there are tons of plans around and they are all medical card stand alones. i strongly discourage you from taking a health insurance attached as a rider - at least as your only health insurance. read the thread to find out why smile.gif basically it's in your own best interest to choose a standalone insurance.
Exception is where you can sign up a participating whole life plan that has only ONE rider in it, H&S. That way, you can treat that whole plan as a H&S plan as that was your intended purpose.
PJusa
post Jul 30 2009, 01:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen,

alright i give you the exception there smile.gif. but you still pay for life and you are stuck with that choice.

personally i tend to reduce life cover (as well as PA and CI) progressively over age to reach almost zero for retirement at a set age (65 in my case). that way the "earning life period" is covered and yearly adjusted. guess that also explains why i am not fond of life insurance wink.gif
Vitorbarbosa
post Jul 30 2009, 02:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


I think waiver of premium and Hospital income shouldn't be your main priority.

You are right that you will not need to pay for the medical card incase diagnose with CI but I'm sure you can fork out the less than 1k to pay for your medical card if you are diagnose with CI.

You can use the additional money that you save for Waiver of Premium and Hospitalisation into investment, which might get you higher return and you are free to choose your own investment instead of funds linked to Insurance company.

Or put that money into a higher Life + CI Coverage.
PJusa
post Jul 30 2009, 02:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Vitorbarbosa,

exactly - that is what i would do too. and it makes sense money-wise. building up a complicated whole life insurance only causes headache if your financial situation worses or when you realise your choices are no longer ideal.
leecy
post Aug 3 2009, 05:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


agree with Pjusa. get a complete medical card plan is the best option. I am an agent with GE. Mike C, you need anything from me. Please PM me


Added on August 3, 2009, 5:40 pmHigher CI coverage and life coverage is quite crucial if we want to cover our income once we diagnosed of critical illness and future payout to our family if we pass away. high CI coverage will ease our life and can replace our income once we unable to work due to CI.

This post has been edited by leecy: Aug 3 2009, 05:40 PM
PJusa
post Aug 3 2009, 06:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
leecy,

GE and Manulife are the only ones covering up to age 100. but: the premium is really really steep. even if i can only compare to plans covering up to 80 - GE and manulife seem to think the risk is much much higher even at age 70, 75,80 etc. why is the premium so high? i mean 30k over for lifetime limit makes not a lot of sense if i start early and eat my limit up slowly. at least there should be no lifetime limit smile.gif
lcl832002
post Aug 3 2009, 09:10 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
646 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 3 2009, 07:05 PM)
leecy,

GE and Manulife are the only ones covering up to age 100. but: the premium is really really steep. even if i can only compare to plans covering up to 80 - GE and manulife seem to think the risk is much much higher even at age 70, 75,80 etc. why is the premium so high? i mean 30k over for lifetime limit makes not a lot of sense if i start early and eat my limit up slowly. at least there should be no lifetime limit smile.gif
*
You can try to search for the AIA latest medical card (unlimited lifetime limit)...
PJusa
post Aug 3 2009, 09:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
sorry i forgot AIA exelcareplus. i got the premium schedule for lifetime limit. how much extra is it for unlimited lifetime limit?
numbertwo
post Aug 3 2009, 10:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 3 2009, 09:22 PM)
sorry i forgot AIA exelcareplus. i got the premium schedule for lifetime limit. how much extra is it for unlimited lifetime limit?
*
Here is the rate for each age band >= age 90.

FOR OCCUPATIONAL CLASSES 1 & 2

Age E+M150 E+M200 E+M250 E+M300 E+M350
90* 15,309.00 18,484.00 21,692.50 24,834.00 27,979.00
91* 15,769.50 19,038.00 22,342.50 25,581.00 28,819.00
92* 16,243.50 19,610.00 23,012.50 26,349.00 29,680.00
93* 16,729.50 20,198.00 23,705.00 27,138.00 30,569.00
94* 17,232.00 20,802.00 24,417.50 27,951.00 31,489.50
95* 17,748.00 21,426.00 25,150.00 28,791.00 32,434.50
96* 18,280.50 22,068.00 25,905.00 29,658.00 33,407.50
97* 18,829.50 22,730.00 26,682.50 30,546.00 34,412.00
98* 19,393.50 23,412.00 27,482.50 31,464.00 35,444.50
99* 19,975.50 24,114.00 28,307.50 32,406.00 36,505.00


E+M = ECP + MCP
PJusa
post Aug 3 2009, 11:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
oh ... i overlooked the second schedule posted. aiya... sometimes just cant see. thanks numbertwo - for a small fee no lifetime limit... not too bad - will add this into the comparison as an extra plan.
raph
post Aug 4 2009, 01:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(raph @ Jul 25 2009, 02:19 PM)
Attached File  ECP_premium_schedule.pdf ( 74.56k ) Number of downloads: 101


Attached File  MCP_premium_schedule.pdf ( 129.83k ) Number of downloads: 87



*
QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 3 2009, 09:22 PM)
sorry i forgot AIA exelcareplus. i got the premium schedule for lifetime limit. how much extra is it for unlimited lifetime limit?
*
refer to "MCP premium schedule"
numbertwo
post Aug 4 2009, 10:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


PJUsa,
For the rest of the plans which you requested Info ie. hongleong's, AM's.etc I feel it is not necessary. What is your take on plans offered by these bank's subsidiaries? I never consider buying any insurance products offered by these players..except fire insurance which usually imposed/defaulted by the mortgage.
PJusa
post Aug 4 2009, 11:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
well i have only seen the RHB plan and it was not impressive. i have rejected many medical plans from the even entering the list as they are simply put more a joke than an insurance. i even found one seriously offering a medical insurance with an annual limit of 5k. forgot which bank but it made me laugh.

chances are the others are equally bad. even some GI products are not really worth much.

and for what it's worth: i dont let the banks pressure me into taking their fire insurance. they only want it for sideincome. i choose my own insurance against the banks will (RHB). they cant force you to use theirs they have to give you a choice. and if your nego power is good they will do so anyway. i go direct and cash the comission myself wink.gif
numbertwo
post Aug 4 2009, 02:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


Pacific has a stand-alone 36CI plan..Much lower premium for lady age ie 36-45 compares to AIG's.
PJusa
post Aug 4 2009, 02:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
thanks! makes two plans now. i got the AIA plan - its the same as insuranceonline.my. AIA max. 2 policies per insured i.e. max cover 300k. will do a comparison per 1k insured for the two.


Added on August 4, 2009, 5:44 pmi did a comparison between the AIA and the pacific plan. AIA offers the cheapest rate per 1k insured througout all plans UNLESS you are a female non-smoking. in that case pacific is offering the best rate.

this is true for a cover from age 1-65 as well as for 10-65, 20-65, 30-65, 40-65, 50-65, 60-65. pacific covers longer though.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Aug 4 2009, 05:44 PM
raph
post Aug 5 2009, 12:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
Also looking for Critical Illness standalone polices. So far I only have Pacific and AIA GI. Any other companies offering CI as standalone?
may i know what is AIA GI ?

PJusa
post Aug 5 2009, 08:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
AIA GI - AIA General Insurance
mtsen
post Aug 5 2009, 09:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


some h&s plans sold in bank are actually the same as insurance companies, only minus the commissions paid to the agency distribution channel, that way, you got the same plan (cover the same risk) with cheaper price.

But MOST of those plans are NOT 'exact' and have 'tricks' inside ...

the trend is also transfer the commission to the bank officer .. sad.gif

about my own search for top up, its still a confusing and frustrating journey ... I was happy with AXA value, then impressed with ING's feature ... then an Allianz agent shared his bad claim experience on stand alone plans ...

despite how much you know sometimes it is just hard to get over the emotion part .... biggrin.gif
p3nang
post Aug 5 2009, 10:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


cheer
raph
post Aug 5 2009, 12:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 5 2009, 08:35 AM)
AIA GI - AIA General Insurance
*
oh thats mean u referring to AIA critical illness shield?
ok ok i thought AIA got new product
PJusa
post Aug 5 2009, 12:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen,

bad claims experience in what sense? i have never had any bad experiences before. only once the insurance mistook the hospital invoice for a new bill and asked me to submit further info. dunno why damansara send invoice to them that looked like second bill. most things were paid in full only one time some deduction was made which i asked them about and then they reversed the deduction. i think claims is about beeing sure of your rights also - or you use the agent to do lah. i think claims will be same for GI and life. both wont be happy to pay but will do as per cover - latest if you push wink.gif axa so far has always been very very attentive - even emails get answered professionally withing an hour or two during business hours.
numbertwo
post Aug 5 2009, 10:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


mtsen,
care to share which feature(s) of ING's medcard impress you ?

To me, their cashless card is expensive but I guess it is due to 'as charge' feature in their cancer/kidney outpatient claims, and Co-Insurance of RM50 per admission is quite good, provided they don't impose the 20%-80% co-ins when you have to upgrade your room.

And also, there is an alteration term in their contract which you should vary of :

Alterations
The Company reserves the right to amend the terms and provisions of this Policy by giving 30 days’ prior notice in writing by ordinary post to the Policy Owner’s last known address in the Company’s records, and such amendment will be applicable from the next renewal of this Policy. No alteration or endorsement to this Policy shall be valid unless authorised by the Company and such approval is endorsed thereon.

Hope to hear your comments soon.
mtsen
post Aug 5 2009, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 5 2009, 12:59 PM)
mtsen,

bad claims experience in what sense? i have never had any bad experiences before. only once the insurance mistook the hospital invoice for a new bill and asked me to submit further info. dunno why damansara send invoice to them that looked like second bill. most things were paid in full only one time some deduction was made which i asked them about and then they reversed the deduction. i think claims is about beeing sure of your rights also - or you use the agent to do lah. i think claims will be same for GI and life. both wont be happy to pay but will do as per cover - latest if you push wink.gif axa so far has always been very very attentive - even emails get answered professionally withing an hour or two during business hours.
*
as in he was promoting stand alone plans in the past but when shit happens, some claims didn't go through smoothly and all his friends cursed at him. While the whole life plan with rider's claims usually went through smoothly. So now he only promote rider H&S .... Even if what he said is true, it only applies to his company I think

logically I know he is getting more commission by recommending a whole life plan / investment link, but emotionallly I cann't help to wonder if I may face claim issues in future, afterall, this is my top up plan, ie not my first and fundamental plan.
PJusa
post Aug 5 2009, 10:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

i guess 20/80 still applies. not entirely sure though. amendmend clause is almost always present but only applies to the portfolio. also amendmend is better than alteration wink.gif

mtsen,

only reason why such a thing would occur is due to different covers. allianz is known for expensive policies in europe but also for beeing a very good paymaster.

the part about the comission is however very very true. dont want to imply anything but if i would be an agent i would tend to recommend what is most profitable for me and not just was is best for you.
mtsen
post Aug 5 2009, 10:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(p3nang @ Aug 5 2009, 10:05 AM)
cheer
*
what are you cheering about ? if serious PM me some discount ... hee hee hee

QUOTE(numbertwo @ Aug 5 2009, 10:12 PM)
mtsen,
care to share which feature(s) of ING's medcard impress you ?

To me, their cashless card is expensive but I guess it is due to 'as charge' feature in their cancer/kidney outpatient claims, and Co-Insurance of RM50 per admission is quite good, provided they don't impose the 20%-80% co-ins when you have to upgrade your room.

And also, there is an alteration term in their contract which you should vary of :

Alterations
The Company reserves the right to amend the terms and provisions of this Policy by giving 30 days’ prior notice in writing by ordinary post to the Policy Owner’s last known address in the Company’s records, and such amendment will be applicable from the next renewal of this Policy. No alteration or endorsement to this Policy shall be valid unless authorised by the Company and such approval is endorsed thereon.

Hope to hear your comments soon.
*
Actually all along I didn't like H&S plans mainly because of the limits they put on kidney and cancer.

PJusa shared her consolidated H&S plans with me, so i straight away check out which plans offers NO LIMIT on kidney and cancer outpatient. Then I further analyse value by dividing premium with the annual limit. then I found ING provides the best value for money ( ie. lowest premium per higher annual limit).

This surprises me because I have a close friend who runs quite a successful ING agency, he told me many years ago his ING plan was the best but ofcourse i didn't believe any 'agent' for no reason/support. So by now finding out my choice could be ING means I have wasted 3-5 years not following a friend's advice ....

good point about the alterations, but as I have shared with PJusa in PMs, I didn't really expect any insurer to pay my claims more than 2x of my annual limit. When its time to die, I should just die ( but actually I already have plans what to do when I know i will die smile.gif

On the other hand, I am betting if my 'powerful' ING agency manager value me as much as I 'value' him, perhaps he can help through my tough time ...

but still thanks, I didn't realize about this term, I will ask if this is common in the industry or specific to ING.
numbertwo
post Aug 5 2009, 10:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 5 2009, 10:29 PM)
numbertwo,

i guess 20/80 still applies. not entirely sure though. amendmend clause is almost always present but only applies to the portfolio. also amendmend is better than alteration wink.gif

mtsen,

only reason why such a thing would occur is due to different covers. allianz is known for expensive policies in europe but also for beeing a very good paymaster.

the part about the comission is however very very true. dont want to imply anything but if i would be an agent i would tend to recommend what is most profitable for me and not just was is best for you.
*
Hi PJusa,

I wouldn't be 'worry' so much if I could find the word 'portfolio' in the contract. Most other contracts or brochures print this word '....portfolio basis' clearly so lesser the worries.

So, if mtsen could find out from his ING friend and get some clarification , that would be 'nice'!

And you mentioned

QUOTE
Then I further analyse value by dividing premium with the annual limit. then I found ING provides the best value for money ( ie. lowest premium per higher annual limit).
...this is quite the opposite to what I've calculated, see below...

Male
Co. Product Name Coverage Coverage Premium Average Cover /
/ Code (RM) p.a Lifetime Ttl : (38-45) yrly Prem RM
ING IMPlus (Cashless) 150000 450000 9590.00 1198.75 125.13
ING IMPlus (non-Cashless) 150000 450000 7156.00 894.50 167.69

Sorry , the age band (38-45) is solely for my own calculation purpose....

I don't know how to format this msg box nicely...but the figure 9590.00 is total premium paid from age 38-45. RM1198.75 is the average yearly premium and lastly the figure 125.13=annual limit(RM150,000) / Average yearly premium(RM1198.75). It is something like I get RM125.13 coverage for every ringgit I paid to the insurance co. This coverage is really low compare to those that are offered by GI ie TM or AXA. So, I'm not sure why/how did you get the 'lowest premium per higher annual limit'.. care to share so that I know I may have to change my 'method'... Thanks.

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Aug 5 2009, 10:54 PM
mtsen
post Aug 5 2009, 11:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 5 2009, 10:29 PM)

mtsen,

only reason why such a thing would occur is due to different covers. allianz is known for expensive policies in europe but also for beeing a very good paymaster.

the part about the comission is however very very true. dont want to imply anything but if i would be an agent i would tend to recommend what is most profitable for me and not just was is best for you.
*
If I were the agent, I would still recommend whats best for you NO MATTER how little I earn, so that my client base WILL become a PASSIVE income and NOT just a ONE TIME earning only.

passive income keeps coming in future with less effort while active income may not.

The key difference between an ever lasting business vs. a job like self employment is whether one goes for passive income or just an active and temporary one ...

Hope to have more 21st century agents ASAP... I have a hunch that victorbarbosa may be one, lets just hope he didn't get swallow by money pressure biggrin.gif
PJusa
post Aug 5 2009, 11:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen,

i just dont have that much of high hopes in agents that depend upon a GI and a life insurance to pay. in that situation i would optimize and not purely based upon the client. of course you would have to be subtle there. but i dont want to drift into ethics here. just saying it's in (most ppls) human nature to put oneself before others.

anyway you mentioned ING offers better bang for buck spend. i compared the 100k plans from AXA and ING purely based on annual limit. at age 30 for a male avg. cost per 1k insured annual limit is 4,2400 for axa and 7,5500 ING. if you look at from birth to age 70 to compare the avg. cost per 1k insured is 7,6551 axa vs. 9,4166 ing. (edit: posted cost per RM cover by accident)


if you base your decision on the dialysis/cancer cover you might want to get the cheapest comprehensive plan and top it up with a generous "top-up" plan. havent calculated this but it could very well be cheaper if you choose plans carefully.


This post has been edited by PJusa: Aug 5 2009, 11:48 PM
mtsen
post Aug 6 2009, 07:46 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(numbertwo @ Aug 5 2009, 10:53 PM)
So, if mtsen could find out from his ING friend and get some clarification , that would be 'nice'! 

And you mentioned
...this is quite the opposite to what I've calculated, see below... 

  Male   
Co. Product Name Coverage Coverage Premium Average Cover /
/ Code                    (RM) p.a Lifetime Ttl : (38-45) yrly Prem RM
ING IMPlus (Cashless) 150000 450000 9590.00 1198.75 125.13
ING IMPlus (non-Cashless) 150000 450000 7156.00 894.50 167.69

Sorry , the age band (38-45) is solely for my own calculation purpose....

I don't know how to format this msg box nicely...but the figure 9590.00 is total premium paid from age 38-45.  RM1198.75 is the average yearly premium and lastly the figure 125.13=annual limit(RM150,000) / Average yearly premium(RM1198.75).  It is something like I get RM125.13 coverage for every ringgit I paid to the insurance co.  This coverage is really low compare to those that are offered by GI ie TM or AXA.  So, I'm not sure why/how did you get the 'lowest premium per higher annual limit'..  care to share so that I know I may have to change my 'method'... Thanks.
*
What I have is RM 979 covering RM 150k by ING MediPlus, for for every ringgit I pay, I am insured with RM153.22

the only other plan that also have no limit on kidney/cancer/transplant is Allianz Care Individual, they thave RM 1039 covering 125k, insured RM120.31 per ringgit.

I am not sure about the technique of averaging the premiums, on stand alone plans, future premium can change. when i reach next age bench, I can just revise to find a better plan by then, afterall, that is the good point to adopt a stand alone plan.

TM and AXA are cheaper but they have limits on surgical, kidney/cancer outpatient etc.

QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 5 2009, 11:29 PM)
mtsen,

i just dont have that much of high hopes in agents that depend upon a GI and a life insurance to pay. in that situation i would optimize and not purely based upon the client. of course you would have to be subtle there. but i dont want to drift into ethics here. just saying it's in (most ppls) human nature to put oneself before others.

anyway you mentioned ING offers better bang for buck spend. i compared the 100k plans from AXA and ING purely based on annual limit. at age 30 for a male avg. cost per 1k insured annual limit is 0,0042 for axa and 0,0076 ING. if you look at from birth to age 70 to compare the avg. cost per 1k insured is 0,0077 axa vs. 0,0094 ing.

if you base your decision on the dialysis/cancer cover you might want to get the cheapest comprehensive plan and top it up with a generous "top-up" plan. havent calculated this but it could very well be cheaper if you choose plans carefully.
*
sorry I am a bit lost, so is AXA is the 'cheapest' option, which one is 'generous top up' ?
numbertwo
post Aug 6 2009, 08:58 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(mtsen @ Aug 6 2009, 07:46 AM)
What I have is RM 979 covering RM 150k by ING MediPlus, for for every ringgit I pay, I am insured with RM153.22

the only other plan that also have no limit on kidney/cancer/transplant is Allianz Care Individual, they thave RM 1039 covering 125k, insured RM120.31 per ringgit.

I am not sure about the technique of averaging the premiums, on stand alone plans, future premium can change.  when i reach next age bench, I can just revise to find a better plan by then, afterall, that is the good point to adopt a stand alone plan.

TM and AXA are cheaper but they have limits on surgical, kidney/cancer outpatient etc.
sorry I am a bit lost, so is AXA is the 'cheapest' option, which one is 'generous top up' ?
*
true enough you may switch to a better plan in the next age band but do not forget that once illness strikes, you will find exclusion or loading from the new insurance company that you plan to switch in future. So, I would rather see their average 10 yrs premium over the yearly limit to judge better as i want to stick to the chosen one as long as the plan 'alive'. And you are right that future premium can change, so even if you use the existing (age of next birthdate) to calc you can't guarantee that there won't be a change next year too.

Nevertheless, keep hunting. wink.gif


edited : oh btw..if you have not already known, TM has unlimited cancer treatment and a 'not too bad' yearly limit on kidney dialysis..

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Aug 6 2009, 09:01 AM
Vitorbarbosa
post Aug 6 2009, 10:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Thank you for the nice words mtsen. Really appreciate that.

To all of you guys and gals, don't "hunt" for so long. You might need them earlier than you think.

The best medical plan is not deterimine by how cheap it is, but the value it brings. If you are hospitalised, I'm sure you are willing to pay any amount to cover your hospital bill.

Choose one you are comfortable with. I'm sure there is no such thing as "Best Plan" in town. It just doesn't exist and we do not know what kind of illness that will strike us.


numbertwo
post Aug 6 2009, 11:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(Vitorbarbosa @ Aug 6 2009, 10:32 AM)
Thank you for the nice words mtsen.  Really appreciate that.

To all of you guys and gals, don't "hunt" for so long. You might need them earlier than you think.

The best medical plan is not deterimine by how cheap it is, but the value it brings. If you are hospitalised, I'm sure you are willing to pay any amount to cover your hospital bill.

Choose one you are comfortable with. I'm sure there is no such thing as "Best Plan" in town. It just doesn't exist and we do not know what kind of illness that will strike us.
*
Vitorbarbosa,

[QUOTE]PM me before you make your financial commitment. I'm delighted to help and make sure you will not making mistake![QUOTE]

just wonder, are you doing this on goodwill or fees are chargeable per consultation session?

Tks.
leecy
post Aug 6 2009, 11:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


i am also willing to provide advice on plan to be taken.anyone(ie:numbertwo) who want to understand GE medical plan. please pm me
PJusa
post Aug 6 2009, 11:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi guys,

first of sorry for the confusion. ING is indeed cheaper than Allianz if you look at a premium per 1k cover be it lifetime or just at a specific age (30). i have looked at the cummulative premium due for cover 1-70 and then calculated the average cost per 1k cover. why can i do this without knowing future medical inflation? first of i have todays premiums for various plans. so in todays terms i can give an absolute number to compare. this is good but but not perfect. but there is also another important thing to consider: i can assume that medical inflation will apply to all plans. so UNLESS the risk structure varies significantly between insurers (which it should if you look at such a large age band) then it can be assumed with a decent probability that the medical inflation will be by and large the same across insurers and as such premiums will rise in tandem. so the cheapest plan will likely remain the cheapest plan. mind you this will only apply to a 1k cover comparison and will be more true for high-end plans than low-end plans because the buffer (annual limit/lifetime limit) is larger and it attracts a better range of insured parties than a low-end plan. the uncertainty for low-end plans will be significantly higher. you can also see this if you look at the cost for low end plans. long term cover hovers around 15-20 RM per 1k cover whereas for the high end plans its about 5 RM. its simply more likely to have a higher percentage of claims in comparison to the limit (i.e. a 5k claim on 50k limit is 10% with 500k limit its just 1%).
anyway - it's a good rule of thumb to do a comparison. you could if you want to feed the entire historical premiums into an econometric forecast and start predicting the inflation rate for each plan and then derive a projected forcast. i dont know for sure but i think it would not be that much different for a look at a 70yrs cover.

i very much agree with the argument made regarding the switch. switches are only possible until you get really sick. then you will be stuck with whatever plan you hold at that point in time or face heavy loadings. but this also means that while you are in good health you should do a regular survey to ensure you have the best possible cover given your requirements and market offers.

and i am very much convinced that there is a personal best plan for everyone around given personal priorities / requirements and the plans in the market. it might not be the dream plan but it can be the best the market has to offer you. slight difference in perspective from what Vitorbarbosa is aiming at - yes i did understand what you mean wink.gif

what i was pointing out with the top up idea is this:

you can get a wide cover for the major issues and add a plan with a high deductable that covers a specific subfield that you really want to have. this of course leads to a multitude of permutation options and as such would require a programm to find the cheapest cover.

for example you can combine axa 100k plan (7,65 per k for a male 1-70 avg) with a top up plan that comes with a deductable of 10 or 20k. the first part would be covered by axa in case of dialysis - 20k limit - the extra cost could be as little as 2,45 per k extra.

so your costs end up at 10,10 per k cover.

if you want a higher annual/lifetime limit i.e. you take the 500k plan from axa and top it up with 2,45 (tokio marine) you end up at a cost of 6,69 per k - albeit you get a very high cover - 500k + 150k booster (750k lifetime limit). and the premium you have to pay is of course higher than for a 100k plan. i hope i did make a bit of sense here wink.gif

to do a number comparison: axa 100k + tokia marine medic partner 150k plan gives an average premium of 1134 RM for males (1-70). ING is 941,66. so its 200 bucks extra that give you: no lifetime limit, 750 lifetime 150k limit booster from TM and 50k p.a. dialysis, 150k cancer. to me this does make sense esp. since i am not stuck with the 300k limit from ING - which also applies to dialysis and cancer btw.

sorry for the long post. i hope it was not too confusing/complicated. not that easy to formulate the underlying considerations in a straight-forward manner all the time.
Vitorbarbosa
post Aug 6 2009, 01:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


PJusa, I do that on goodwill. No Charge. Did it with mtsen. But he gave me a lunch treat. That's very nice of him.

I don't mean I can teach but I will share what I know/learnt from my financial mathematics, investment and of course my actuarial mathematics classes with you all.

Sadly, I'm only available around KL, so further away from here is not possible.
mtsen
post Aug 12 2009, 01:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(numbertwo @ Aug 6 2009, 08:58 AM)
true enough you may switch to a better plan in the next age band but do not forget that once illness strikes, you will find exclusion or loading from the new insurance company that you plan to switch in future.  So, I would rather see their average 10 yrs premium over the yearly limit to judge better as i want to stick to the chosen one as long as the plan 'alive'.  And you are right that future premium can change, so even if you use the existing (age of next birthdate) to calc you can't guarantee that there won't be a change next year too.

Nevertheless, keep hunting. wink.gif
edited : oh btw..if you have not already known, TM has unlimited cancer treatment and a 'not too bad' yearly limit on kidney dialysis..
*
my plan is when I am strike by irrecovarable illness, I don't need any new insurance anymore. I have a to do list for such incident and by then, most personal finance stuff will become less important to me. When its time to die, just die. The last thing I want is to hold on just for the sake of holding on. this way, I live my daily life with full conscious what the consequences may be.

What I have on TM is they have 84k limit on Kidney dialysis and cancer, 80k limit on surgeon fee, 25k on anesthetist etc. which TM plan has unlimited cancer treatment ?


Added on August 12, 2009, 1:47 am
QUOTE
to do a number comparison: axa 100k + tokia marine medic partner 150k plan gives an average premium of 1134 RM for males (1-70). ING is 941,66. so its 200 bucks extra that give you: no lifetime limit, 750 lifetime 150k limit booster from TM and 50k p.a. dialysis, 150k cancer. to me this does make sense esp. since i am not stuck with the 300k limit from ING - which also applies to dialysis and cancer btw.



I think I get the concept but I am not sure if it works for my case. If I have both AXA and TM, I would still have kidney dialysis limit at 60k+84k=114k
if I go for ING, my limit is the annual limit which is 150k.

am I right to say your above plan is only valid if one thinks lifetime limit is more important than no limit on dialysis ?


Added on August 12, 2009, 2:14 amneed help again ... when I told one of the agents that I favor ING's no limit on kidney outpatient, then he said the limit is actually for the good of insured ... see below message ...

Zurich is care for the policy holders protection . The limitation is not to limit their coverage but to make sure they can use the given benefit for a long term . By giving them the annual limit , the client will make sure they use only the allocated limit annually rather then use up the entire limit within 2 to 3 years .

what do you think ?

This post has been edited by mtsen: Aug 12 2009, 02:14 AM
PJusa
post Aug 12 2009, 06:42 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen,

quickly - i am aware of your worst case plan. i am not really convinced it will work out but that is up to you entirely. i guess this is a very personal decision so i wont be meddling with it.

the TM plan in question is Medic Plus, the limit you quoted is from Medic Plus which is a full fledged basic H&S plan.

the limit for dialysis is 50k in this plan. which might not do the trick. i would like to know why you are so keen on such a high dialysis treatment limit. i am also quite worried about this and i think - correct me if i am wrong - that 50k from TM plus 60k life from axa (which included the takehome drugs and all) should be enough.

my axa's plan has a lifetime limit of 60k + TM annual 50k (if i need to stretch it ofer 750k this can last me 15 years) so total overall maximum lifetime is 810k for dialysis if i dont touch the TM plan for any other claims. if i want to look at the max cover i can get over 15 years this means 54k p.a.

this translates into around 345 RM per session if we assume i need to go three times a week which is the ideal solution.

if i am very disciplined and i skip all the "bad" food i could get away with 2x4 hrs per week which means RM 520 per treatment. if my previous research was done properly (i only called national kidney foundation to get average numbers a couple of years ago) this will cover the costs involved. i used to work as a dialysis nurse for almost 8 years when i was younger and the treatment frequency was 2 or 3 times weekly in private centers.

i read your info about ING (why the reply has zurich (=MCIS zurich?) i dont know). it's true but wether its care i doubt. it's simply economical. with every year that passes chances are you might get a transplant or die. the last option of course is more attractive to the insurer. however with the standard of dialysis it is very much possible to live a perferctly regular life (minus the weekly sessions) and even work during the rest of the week. you can last 10, 15, 20 years on the machines - and if done well it can be even less risky than a transplant which means plenty of supression drugs to keep the body rejecting the transplant and all. we had a patient (late 30s) who had two (2) kidney transplants during a course of 4 years. both were rejected though and he went back to the machines.

so: IF i need dialysis for really long - i am screwed either way. to me the AXA + TM option worked out to cover the longest period (15 yrs) given the price i pay and given that i really want good cover for other stuff also. if you look purely at dialysis, i am not aware of any plan or plan combination that i can squeeze a higher cover out than 810k overall. you can of course simply buy a third cover. dunno if TM allows you to buy 2 but berjaya also has a top up plan.
mtsen
post Aug 12 2009, 02:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


perhaps my thinking is more shallow in relative to yours, I am not looking for HIGH dialysis payout, I was just considering a plan that is simpler and has less restriction. I don't know how this plan will be utilized but I just want to face less resistance when I need to use it. Commonly industry put a limit on cancer and kidney outpatient, I assume its due to high claim in the past. It makes me think majority of the people claim their policy out due to kidneys/cancer outpatient ? And if I join the majority one day , the last thing I would want is to face a limitation when I need the money ...

the last part is I told a Zurich guy that I like ING and he responded me that way ...

I think I am starting to get the idea of mix and match that you suggested, I would probably pick MSIG Golden Premier annual limit 2mil and no lifetime limit and AXA SmartCare Optimum PLAN 1 ... that way, you have the BEST value for money plan up to age 64 and then AXA's one continue with no lifetime limit until age 80


Added on August 12, 2009, 2:59 pmbtw, is the search over for most others now ? Am I the one procrastinate the most as usual ? smile.gif

PJusa, I just realize Great Eastern is not in your spreadsheet ?



This post has been edited by mtsen: Aug 12 2009, 02:59 PM
PJusa
post Aug 12 2009, 03:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen,

GE is in my mailbox. my daughter is sick and i dont have the time to fit it in. i am not sure if i have time these days as regular work is piling up while i need to spend a lot of time with her. she sitting on my lap now smile.gif

quick info: MSIG plan is bad. its non guaranteed renewal and the overall annual limit of 2M is most misleading. the plan has an actual 250k only sublimit on hospitalisation. the rest of the 2m comprises of organ transplant 250, 500k evacuation and 1 m overseas something which i forgot. and i spoke with them. once you claim they will most likely exclude past conditions. so the plan is rather worthless. also the age limit is very low. but yes i think you got my drift.

INGs plan will probably be slightly easier but the ease will come at a price that you just dont that much actual cover. full refund is not always the best as it comes with the annual limit attached.

i think the reason why most plans come with a sublimit on dialysis and cancer is because technically its not a hospitalisation but a short visit (4 hours in total for dialysis is the norm). those are generally not covered by H&S plans so you might want to consider it an added benefit instead. the bulk of a cancer treatment cost for example is or can also be made to fall under hospitalisation (check yourself in). the main costs of a kidney failure however are with the treatment if its longterm. you might want to confirm this via a call to an insurer. they can give you estimates. i got quoted about 100k for cancer average costs, with less than half of the costs beeing outpatient. dunno if its true but that is the ballpark figure i got from two insurers (pacific and allianz if i remember correctly). since the numbers were pretty much identical from both insurers i took it as a given average.
ekestima
post Aug 12 2009, 03:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
930 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Hornbill Land
I think there r many critical illness plan offerred by insurance company.

Some have monetary return after certain period and some dun have. Means that watever money u paid is "hangus" unless u hit the jackpot. Meaning u got critical illness.

Those without any monetary return will be much cheaper if compare with those with monetary return.
mtsen
post Aug 12 2009, 03:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


PJusa,

take cares ... H1N1 2nd phase is coming and so is common flu vastly over run us now ... which btw, I heard that since H1N1 is declared stage 6 by WTO, its NOT covered by our normal insurance plan ... ie. non critical and not claimable under H&S ....
PJusa
post Aug 12 2009, 03:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
ekestima

"Means that watever money u paid is "hangus" unless u hit the jackpot. Meaning u got critical illness."

that is a critical illness policy and not a medical plan

"Those without any monetary return will be much cheaper if compare with those with monetary return."

those are the only ones worth considering as those are actually insurance plans.


Added on August 12, 2009, 3:44 pmmtsen,

no worries. if you get hospitalised for H1N1 you can claim it. no problem. any medically necessary hospitalisation is covered.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Aug 12 2009, 03:44 PM
mtsen
post Aug 12 2009, 04:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


medical plan's jackpot is hospitalization biggrin.gif

or more like consolation prize ...

This post has been edited by mtsen: Aug 12 2009, 04:07 PM
YuNGSeNG
post Aug 12 2009, 09:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,382 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(mtsen @ Aug 12 2009, 03:42 PM)
PJusa,

take cares ... H1N1 2nd phase is coming and so is common flu vastly over run us now ... which btw, I heard that since H1N1 is declared stage 6 by WTO, its NOT covered by our normal insurance plan ... ie. non critical and not claimable under H&S ....
*
H1N1 is cover under medical card
Justin1000
post Aug 12 2009, 10:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(YuNGSeNG @ Aug 12 2009, 10:38 PM)
H1N1 is cover under medical card
*
Most insurers have an exclusion clause on Communicable Disease that require quarantine by law. So if H1N1 is not a communicable disease require quarantine by law, hence it should be covered.

However there are also companies that does not exclude communicable disease that require quarantine by law, e.g AIA etc.
You would notice that there are companies that exclude HIV or AIDS and there are companies that cover HIV and AIDS as long as it is not pre existing or there is no non disclosure at point of application,

As such price/premium is important, the benefits and coverage is equally important.

c.o.o.l
post Aug 12 2009, 11:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Even if you strike by H1N1 now, you might not get to stay in private hospital. When you go to private hospital after you having symptoms of H1N1, some private hospital will still refer you to goverment hospital.
Justin1000
post Aug 13 2009, 11:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(c.o.o.l @ Aug 13 2009, 12:52 AM)
Even if you strike by H1N1 now, you might not get to stay in private hospital. When you go to private hospital after you having symptoms of H1N1, some private hospital will still refer you to goverment hospital.
*
You may want to check your fact. For H1N1, quite a few private hospitals have been designated to treat H1N1
c.o.o.l
post Aug 14 2009, 12:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(Justin1000 @ Aug 13 2009, 11:20 PM)
You may want to check your fact. For H1N1, quite  a few  private hospitals have been designated to treat H1N1
*
Yes I know this.

The fact is what Im saying is based on what a patient that went to government hospital for H1N1 diagnosis said. He went to private hospital to do checking, but the hospital refer him to government hospital with the reason short of medicine.
mtsen
post Aug 14 2009, 10:20 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(Justin1000 @ Aug 12 2009, 10:10 PM)
Most insurers have an exclusion clause on Communicable Disease that require quarantine by law. So if H1N1 is not a communicable disease require quarantine by law, hence it should be covered.

However there are also companies that does not exclude communicable disease that require quarantine by law, e.g AIA etc.
You would notice that there are companies that exclude HIV or AIDS and there are companies that cover HIV and AIDS as long as it is not pre existing or there is no non disclosure at point of application,

As such price/premium is important, the benefits and coverage is equally important.
*
at the end, the most important part is to find a doctor who is willing to review your insurance plan before writing the medical report ... or is that not ethical ?

I remembered reading somewhere on a detail assessment on why H1N1 is not covered and admitted by the insurer, I will dig that one out and see there are any new info we haven't covered here ...


Added on August 14, 2009, 10:26 am
QUOTE
Alterations
The Company reserves the right to amend the terms and provisions of this Policy by giving 30 days’ prior notice in writing by ordinary post to the Policy Owner’s last known address in the Company’s records, and such amendment will be applicable from the next renewal of this Policy. No alteration or endorsement to this Policy shall be valid unless authorised by the Company and such approval is endorsed thereon.
About above 'alteration' from ING, my ING friend commented that it is a common clause across all insurers. He also highlight another clause that says,

" ... insurer also remains the right to withdraw the whole plan (where everyone will be affected) ... generally after approval from ... blah blah blah ... "

so insurer typically do not change your plan specifically, but when too many people claim too much in the whole plan, they may stop the whole thing entirely ... legally.

can some experts other than ING also confirm these are the 2 common clauses in medical coverages ?

Thanks !

This post has been edited by mtsen: Aug 14 2009, 10:26 AM
PJusa
post Aug 14 2009, 11:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
mtsen,

every policy is subject to portfolio withdrawal. but if claims are getting to high the insurance will generally not withdraw the plan but just adjust premiums. that is what the premium adjustment is for. portfolio withdrawal is bad for the image and not that easily done.

the alterations is generally applicable only to the blaket policy (i.e. the policy that everyone is subjected to). this doesnt mean you are subject to individual exclusions - i havent seen the policy wording for ING yet. if you post it here or send it to me i take a look for you as to how save the plan is for you. just takes a few minutes to find the important clauses.


Added on August 14, 2009, 11:35 ammtsen,

every policy is subject to portfolio withdrawal. but if claims are getting to high the insurance will generally not withdraw the plan but just adjust premiums. that is what the premium adjustment is for. portfolio withdrawal is bad for the image and not that easily done.

the alterations is generally applicable only to the blaket policy (i.e. the policy that everyone is subjected to). this doesnt mean you are subject to individual exclusions - i havent seen the policy wording for ING yet. if you post it here or send it to me i take a look for you as to how save the plan is for you. just takes a few minutes to find the important clauses.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Aug 14 2009, 11:35 AM
mtsen
post Aug 14 2009, 01:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


understood, plan withdrawal was referring to those guarantee renewal with fix premium plans ...

so I guess its safe to say its a common industry practice and not something specific exclusion from ING !?

*sigh* life, tpd, critical illness and pa are so much simpler ...
PJusa
post Aug 14 2009, 02:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
i dont think they are simpler. its the structure per se that is complicated. i find life even more complicated because of its nature. i rather stick with plain insurances that cover what they are for and thats that smile.gif

but yes CI is simple cause not many offers and they all are almost the same.

mtsen,

can you share the policy wording for ING with me? i am really interested in it smile.gif for personal reasons too. i am running behind quite a bit with my comparison but i will continue doing it so i have an overview once and for all. i am basically stuck with trying to get PRU running and well i dont really want to skip it. the plan might actually be interesting to some esp. when taken up very early.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Aug 14 2009, 03:35 PM
Vitorbarbosa
post Aug 14 2009, 05:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Of course, it's almost the same across industry.

All regulated under the same body. Cannot goes wrong. Or all are wrong.

Justin1000
post Aug 14 2009, 11:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(c.o.o.l @ Aug 14 2009, 01:19 AM)
Yes I know this.

The fact is what Im saying is based on what a patient that went to government hospital for H1N1 diagnosis said. He went to private hospital to do checking, but the hospital refer him to government hospital with the reason short of medicine.
*
These are suspected cases, not confirmed case. There have been confirm cases treated at the private hospitals and passed away subsequently. Previously in the case of SARS, no private hospital is allowed to treat.
numbertwo
post Aug 15 2009, 12:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(mtsen @ Aug 14 2009, 10:20 AM)
at the end, the most important part is to find a doctor who is willing to review your insurance plan before writing the medical report ... or is that not ethical ?

I remembered reading somewhere on a detail assessment on why H1N1 is not covered and admitted by the insurer, I will dig that one out and see there are any new info we haven't covered here ...


Added on August 14, 2009, 10:26 am

About above 'alteration' from ING, my ING friend commented that it is a common clause across all insurers.  He also highlight another clause that says,

" ... insurer also remains the right to withdraw the whole plan (where everyone will be affected) ... generally after approval from ... blah blah blah ... "

so insurer typically do not change your plan specifically, but when too many people claim too much in the whole plan, they may stop the whole thing entirely ... legally.

can some experts other than ING also confirm these are the 2 common clauses in medical coverages ?

Thanks !
*
Hi mtsen, PJusa.,
Here are the exact wordings on ING MediPlus plan:

QUOTE
4. Portfolio Withdrawal Condition
The Company reserves the right to cancel this Policy if it decides to discontinue transacting hospitalization and surgical business. Cancellation of the portfolio as a whole shall be given by written notice to the Policy Owner at least thirty (30) days prior to expiry of the period of cover (i.e. the next policy anniversary) and the Company will run off all policies to expiry of the period of cover (i.e. the next policy anniversary) within the portfolio.

5. Alterations
The Company reserves the right to amend the terms and provisions of this Policy by giving 30 days’ prior notice in writing by ordinary post to the Policy Owner’s last known address in the Company’s records, and such amendment will be applicable from the next renewal of this Policy. No alteration or endorsement to this Policy shall be valid unless authorised by the Company and such approval is endorsed thereon.


While 'Portfolio Withdrawal' clause is common in all 'Good' medic plans, 'Alteration' clause is NOT COMMON. At least I've not seen such wording in any other contracts that I've had a chance to read. And even if they do, usually the word 'portfolio' will be there under the alteration terms..And this 'Portfolio' word is missing in this clause 5. Alterations.. wink.gif

So, Better to get clearance from their underwriting department that to be sorry later on...

Rgrds


Hi PJusa,
Why bother PRU's med card? I thought they are always linked to ILP and that won't be an apple-to-apple comparo to the other plans that we have been talking so far?

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Aug 15 2009, 12:07 AM
PJusa
post Aug 15 2009, 09:19 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

first the clauses. i like number 4) "if it decides to discontinue transacting hospitalization and surgical business" - means as long as ING offers H&S plans the portfolio withdrawal does not apply.

5) is not that bad "this policy" refers to the policy jacket not the individual terms. and it does pop up in pretty much every policy - it has to since this also allows the company to improve the cover. for example AXA adjusted rates and improved coverage with room categories and additional cover. but you always double check with underwriting.

i am bothering with PRUhealth because while this plan is linked to life it does offer some benefits to interested parties who intend to cover their kid from early on. while there are various disadvantages i like to have all the plans so it's a proper evaluation but yes, for now i shall skip the premium comparison - it's a pain to compare like that. have entered the benefits though.
Vitorbarbosa
post Aug 15 2009, 06:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Yeah, not easy to compare at all.

Get one that suits you. You will not overpay.
c.o.o.l
post Aug 15 2009, 11:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(Justin1000 @ Aug 14 2009, 11:05 PM)
These are suspected cases, not confirmed case. There have been confirm cases treated at the private hospitals and passed away subsequently. Previously in the case of SARS, no private hospital is allowed to treat.
*
If you are suspected and already refer to government hospital, will you still get a chance to transfer back to private once you are confirmed case?

Just to update the news, Prudential just announced that prudential's medical card now can be use for H1N1.
amerz
post Aug 16 2009, 01:23 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
508 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Lalaland

just got my quotation for GE medical card(GM2),
it seems that GE premium is much more cheaper but with some restriction of course.

Most of the Medical Card that has less restriction, the premium is higher than the one that has more restriction.
it's really hard to decide which Medical Card is the rite one. rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by amerz: Aug 16 2009, 01:34 AM
Justin1000
post Aug 16 2009, 11:48 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(c.o.o.l @ Aug 16 2009, 12:46 AM)
If you are suspected and already refer to government hospital, will you still get a chance to transfer back to private once you are confirmed case?

Just to update the news, Prudential just announced that prudential's medical card now can be use for H1N1.
*
Do not understand what you meant.

Good to know that Pru and many other insurers now declare they cover H1N1, but the fact remains that they have a clause to exclude Communicable Diseases requiring quarantine at their disposal, while some insurers do not have such clause. As such every time there is disease such as H1N1, policyholders are at uncertainty if they are protected by their medical plan. The peace of mind is not there .
PJusa
post Aug 16 2009, 02:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
Justin1000,

i have no idea where you get this clause from. i have checked the policies i have at hand (TM, AXA) and neither have a clause like that in the policy wording. in fact H1N1 is a derivative of the flue. it's covered by default (no need to make an announcement for it either) with the medical policy just as a case of the real flue would be covered if it requires hospitalisation. and i have seen other policies (MSIG, Pacific etc. ) which also had no such clause. mind you i am speaking for general insurance and not life insurance here. but i doubt the situation is different with life.
c.o.o.l
post Aug 16 2009, 11:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(Justin1000 @ Aug 16 2009, 11:48 AM)
Do not understand what you meant.

Good to know that Pru and many other insurers now declare they cover H1N1, but the fact remains that they have a clause to exclude Communicable Diseases  requiring quarantine at their disposal, while some insurers do not have such clause. As such every time there is disease such as H1N1, policyholders are at uncertainty if they are protected by their medical plan. The peace of mind is not there .
*
I mean when you are suspected and went to government hospital for diagnosis. After that, doctor tell you that you are confirmed case. You already quarantine inside government hospital. You still have the chance to transfer to private hospital?
PJusa
post Aug 17 2009, 08:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
c.o.o.l,

a transfer would be a different situation i guess. if you are quaranteened they will surely not agree to a transfer. but i am guessing only there. anyone can confirm?
numbertwo
post Aug 17 2009, 10:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 16 2009, 02:18 PM)
Justin1000,

i have no idea where you get this clause from. i have checked the policies i have at hand (TM, AXA) and neither have a clause like that in the policy wording. in fact H1N1 is a derivative of the flue. it's covered by default (no need to make an announcement for it either) with the medical policy just as a case of the real flue would be covered if it requires hospitalisation. and i have seen other policies (MSIG, Pacific etc. ) which also had no such clause. mind you i am speaking for general insurance and not life insurance here. but i doubt the situation is different with life.
*
6. Private nursing, rest cures or sanitaria care, illegal drugs, intoxication, sterilisation, venereal disease and its
sequelae, AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) or ARC (AIDS Related Complex) and HIV related
diseases, and any communicable diseases required quarantine by law.


This is the clause stated in AXA SCO (found in brochure, not sure about the actual policy/contract as I don't have one)
mtsen
post Aug 17 2009, 04:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Prudential's strength is Investment Link, so the key idea is they will provide you the FULL portfolio. Especially when you do not invest in stocks and derivatives anyway, this kind of arrangement is not bad after all.

so once u trust them with your investment money, you can go with any of their plans no matter you have PruHealth ( just a rider ) in it or not. As of today's condition, minimum is 5 years to start seeing profit and 20 years of continuous premium payment would land the policy in pretty much a good state (self-sustain).

statistic and historical wise (Malaysia), Prudential's investment link is quite stable in configuration, ie. does not easily lapse even in bad investment years. Hence, its ILP premium is slightly higher than others too (bigger buffer to protect the downturn etc.).

my analysis on PruHealth here
http://malaysiapersonalfinance.blogspot.co...d-surgical.html

generally insurers have clauses to protect themselves. even if by chance they miss anything, they still can go through court cases to settle certain un-payment. H1N1 clause was meant for war and end of the world outbreak etc. So for now, insurer may pay H1N1 claims. However, if one day more than 30% of the population are claiming it, I doubt if any insurer can keep paying ...

there is usually a threshold ... perhaps Victorbarbosa can share ? How many of us have to die before insurer stop paying H1N1 claims ? biggrin.gif
PJusa
post Aug 17 2009, 09:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

many thanks for the pointer. found it also - well hidden behind AIDS wink.gif - but i got a clarification: the exlcusion applies to quarantine only if not mistaken i.e. to individuals who are not currently ill—but who are known to have been exposed to the illness. if you get ill, the exclusion does not apply. will double check with underwriting on this.

mtsen,
while you do have a point i dont see why investment should be linked with insurance. it just doesnt feel right - i use my savings and put them in unit trusts and other things. at the end of the day i dont think the performance will be much different on a 30 yrs horizon. the disadvantages have been highlighted (rider, higher premium, higher overhead etc.). its the most convenient way to get cover - like set it and forget it wink.gif but its most likely not the cost efficient or most flexible choice.
Justin1000
post Aug 17 2009, 11:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Aug 17 2009, 11:49 AM)
6. Private nursing, rest cures or sanitaria care, illegal drugs, intoxication, sterilisation, venereal disease and its
sequelae, AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) or ARC (AIDS Related Complex) and HIV related
diseases, and any communicable diseases required quarantine by law.


This is the clause stated in AXA SCO (found in brochure, not sure about the actual policy/contract as I don't have one)
*
It should be in the contract also.
mtsen
post Aug 18 2009, 03:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 17 2009, 09:49 PM)
numbertwo,

mtsen,
while you do have a point i dont see why investment should be linked with insurance. it just doesnt feel right - i use my savings and put them in unit trusts and other things. at the end of the day i dont think the performance will be much different on a 30 yrs horizon. the disadvantages have been highlighted (rider, higher premium, higher overhead etc.). its the most convenient way to get cover - like set it and forget it wink.gif but its most likely not the cost efficient or most flexible choice.
*
if one already know how to invest through mutual fund, then investment link may carry less weight yes. Like wise, if one is good at managing her own portfolio ( like you ), ILP may become expensive. However, most people still can't manage their own portfolio better than the industry's offer yet

QUOTE(prudential @ Aug 18 2009, 02:08 PM)
back to the term of Law of Large Numbers in Insurance
How many of us have to die before insurer stop paying H1N1 claims ?
When there are deaths occur at the same place and the same time , like 100 of people die at the same University and at the same time. Insurers stop paying for H1N1.
*
wow, 100 is not that high. I should find a good place to die so that my death is more noticeable ... smile.gif
PJusa
post Aug 18 2009, 03:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
prudential,

could you elaborate where you get this information from? on what grounds would this be possible? i have a contract and the insurer has little room to refuse a claim that is covered - H1N1 is flue like any other. if i get hospitalised for it my insurance will have to pay the bill. wether 1 person died from it or 200,000. the deathtoll should be entirely unrelated anyway.

mtsen,

i am not sure about the investment part. i gives a potentially false sense of security. i prefer to know what i really have to pay and go along with it. furthermore if PRU is publishing the average premium due subject to investment results, its lowering the perceived premiums to some degree by incorperating expected profits. it effectivel clouds the actual costs of the insurance. i am also not sure how the problem of medical inflation is handled here. the way i see it is that this policy is not transparent. c.o.o.l might be of great help in sheding some light to the actual costs though.
i however dont like it when costs are placed in a way that is mostly uncomparable to the general public. it keeps people from beeing able to compare apple to apple.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Aug 18 2009, 03:29 PM
Vitorbarbosa
post Aug 18 2009, 11:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Why say 100? I heard from a prudential agent that all prudential medical card covers H1N1 as they do not have the exclusion on the communicable disease requires quarantine by law.

And Mr. Prudential, I think your 100 figure is very misleading. It might be best if you do not answer to that unless you are right.

MTsen, to be honest, I'm not sure how many needs to be hospitalised before the insurance company says no. At this moment, what I know in the industry is that, although there is this exclusion clause in the policy, most insurers still willing to pay for H1N1 cases.

I really can't answer you on that as that is out of my area of expertise (risk management + claims experience + future experience + shareholder's money + company's position + .... + ...)

But I thought death from H1N1 is covered? Only medical plan is not covered (according to the T & C but heard still covered at this moment).



allenultra
post Aug 19 2009, 11:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh



Medical plan that bought before 1st of Jan 2006 is covered for h1n1.
Those who bought after that, LIAM still having discussion on that.

That's the latest news I know. smile.gif
PJusa
post Aug 19 2009, 02:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
hi,

due to the fact that there seems to be a lot of doubt regarding H1N1 i would like to let you guys know that i called AXA, Allianz and Tokio Marine earlier. They all related this clarification which I will post here for your information:

1) The quarantine clause does not mean the insurance will not pay if you get H1N1 and need to be hospitalised. It means you will not be covered by your insurance IF you are quarantined for the costs of the quarantine if your are not infected.

2) If you are hospitalised due to H1N1 you are covered as to the limitations of the respective policy. There is no question about this.

3) If you are not hospitalised but get H1N1 you are not covered UNLESS you have outpatient benefits. Outpatient benefits would also cover H1N1. The medical plans in malaysia usually cover only H&S costs.

4) No insurer can or will start to exclude H1N1 cover from any policies in force as per above due to "too many cases". There is no such thing as a restrospective exclusion. Also all three insurers assured me they will not start to put exclusions into new policy blankets. Of course this is no written guarantee but I would have been surprised if they would have said anything else to be honest.

I hope this puts you guys at ease a bit.

IF any insurer decides to give their insured better cover and also cover the costs of H1N1 unrelated to H&S then even better. Otherwise there is no need to make any bulletin as the one from Mr. Yem - its understood and part of exisiting contracts. there never was any doubt about the cover to begin with.
thomstan
post Aug 22 2009, 12:57 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
[quote=mtsen,Aug 12 2009, 01:26 AM]my plan is when I am strike by irrecovarable illness, I don't need any new insurance anymore.  I have a to do list for such incident and by then, most personal finance stuff will become less important to me.  When its time to die, just die.  The last thing I want is to hold on just for the sake of holding on.  this way, I live my daily life with full conscious what the consequences may be.

What I have on TM is they have 84k limit on Kidney dialysis and cancer, 80k limit on surgeon fee, 25k on anesthetist etc.   which TM plan has unlimited cancer treatment ?


Added on August 12, 2009, 1:47 am
I think I get the concept but I am not sure if it works for my case.  If I have both AXA and TM, I would still have kidney dialysis limit at 60k+84k=114k
if I go for ING, my limit is the annual limit which is 150k.

am I right to say your above plan is only valid if one thinks lifetime limit is more important than no limit on dialysis ?


Added on August 12, 2009, 2:14 amneed help again ... when I told one of the agents that I favor ING's no limit on kidney outpatient, then he said the limit is actually for the good of insured ... see below message ...

Zurich is care for the policy holders protection . The limitation is not to limit their coverage but to make sure they can use the given benefit for a long term . By giving them the annual limit , the client will make sure they use only the allocated limit annually rather then use up  the entire limit within 2 to 3 years .

what do you think ?
*

[/quote]


I say Zurich is protecting themselves.


Added on August 22, 2009, 1:47 am[quote=mtsen,Aug 5 2009, 09:49 AM]some h&s plans sold in bank are actually the same as insurance companies, only minus the commissions paid to the agency distribution channel, that way, you got the same plan (cover the same risk) with cheaper price. 

But MOST of those plans are NOT 'exact' and have 'tricks' inside ...

the trend is also transfer the commission to the bank officer ..  sad.gif

about my own search for top up, its still a confusing and frustrating journey ... I was happy with AXA value, then impressed with ING's feature ... then an Allianz agent shared his bad claim experience on stand alone plans ...

despite how much you know sometimes it is just hard to get over the emotion part .... biggrin.gif
*

[/quote]


Basically, what mtsen said is correct. They are almost the same.
The major difference here is you will be your own agent. You'll need to do all the claims on your own instead of having an agent to assist you while you rest at home.


Added on August 22, 2009, 1:59 am[quote=twentyfour24,Feb 21 2009, 05:01 PM]the 1st coverage u need to have is medical plan.
just attached medical card n critical illness plan will do.
some of the insurance company on critical illness already include for savings,term,PA plan as well.so u no need to pay extra.
*

[/quote]

I know this post has gone way back, but just to refresh, it is exceptionally undesireable to attach a medical card into a critical illness plan.
Medical card is suppose to cover you up till age 80 or 70 at least.
If you do attach a medical card into a critical illness plan, you will lose the benefits of medical card once you are diagnosed with any of the listed critical illness because the critical illness plan will pay you the benefits and thus your policy contract is void, with all riders in it.
If the illness is diagnosed at the age of 50, then you will bare all medical bills on your own for the next 20 or 30 years.


Added on August 22, 2009, 2:01 am[quote=normal_user,Feb 21 2009, 07:16 PM]Its difficult to separate CI & Med Card if you already subscribed long time ago, unless if you buy 2nd policy that focuses on CI only and reduce the CI benefit for the 1st policy.

I know this one investment & protection plan that gives u RM200K CI protection for around RM100-150 per month (according to age). Or u can configure it for RM100K CI & RM100K Death. Policy runs until age 100 years old. If for non-investment/savings plan, the premium would be much  much cheaper. PM me if u want to know more.
*

[/quote]


I believe it is possible to separate all riders at any point of time/year. You are being very misleading normal_user.


Added on August 22, 2009, 2:07 am[quote=Gen-X,Feb 28 2009, 11:49 PM]
I need CI for protection.

I read from KC Lau, Money Matter that we need CI protection of 3 x our annual income. Therefore I am under protected (my existing CI policy which was bought earlier based on my earlier income level and is currently inadequate). Adding this RM 50K will bring it up to an adequate level.

I am healthy at the moment, but getting sick during older age is a guarantee.

And since we are on this topic, what would be considered a adequate protection for Hospitalization & Medical?

Xuzen


Added on February 21, 2009, 12:17 pm
My Life Policy is adequate.

I am now looking to up my CI and Med card Protection. As one progress in life, ones' needs and protection increases. Yes, I want to keep my CI & Med card policy separate, it is cheaper this way isn't it?

Xuzen
*

[/quote]

Xuzen, I agree with what raylimfs said. What the are odds of you getting the 36 CI? Even if you are dignosed with 36 CI, how long you think the RM50K or RM100K going to last you if you need treatment? Go and ask people, 1 time treatment for cancer may cost above RM30K if dignosed early.

What I noted from your reply above is you are looking for Med Card Protection. Assuming that you dont' have a Med Card, my opinion is that better to get one instead of just CI only. My wife's nephew was hit by a car last week and the had to undergo major operation and after discharged requires therapy and it will cost more that RM40K.

I myself have Prudential Med Card annual limit RM75K and Litimetime RM225K since 2003 at RM200/month and last year upgraded it to lifetime amount of RM300,000 and up to age 75 (from 60)) since I getting old and foresee more health problems sad.gif and now paying about RM340.month. So my point is the ealier you are covered the premium is less and check until what age does the insurance covers you.

My eldest is getting his driving license this year and will be going out more often so I just got him a Med Card from Prudential. His plan is slightly different from mine where it does not insured for take home medicine and got co-insured but his annual amount is same as mine RM75K and Lifetime amount is RM750,000 and monthly premium is only RM125! It also includes RM20K for Accident Out Patient Treatment, RM20K Life and CI.

Suggest you talk to a Prudential agent and compare with others, best if the agent have been doing insurance fulltime for years and highly recommended and not some guy you met that will not provide you service in time of need. And if you do consider Prudential, get the higher Lifetime amount as RM750K vs. RM500K and higher hospital room allowance (what you think it will cost 20 years from now for twin bed room at private hospital) as the premium diff is only about RM20-30/monthly.

Some people may tell you to get Personal Accident and just CI insurance only since it is cheaper but what in the event one is hospitalized because of illness/disease/cancer, can he/she afford to pay the hospital bills at private hospital and not burdening family members after using up all his/her life savings? And I am not even talking about being in ICU or having to go dialysis where the cost is just tremendous.

Lastly, is you are paying taxes, Medical Insurance is tax deductable which is different from the EPF & Life Insurance combined deductable.
*

[/quote]


Hi Gen-X

If you've yet to know, you are already paying an extremely high premium for such a coverage. Go back to your agent and tell him/her to answer you truthfully. You can maintain with RM200/month for such a coverage.
If your agent is telling you no way, come back here and tell us what was the reason given.

This post has been edited by thomstan: Aug 22 2009, 02:07 AM
PJusa
post Aug 22 2009, 08:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
for impartial analysis at a price you can try any of the following brokers - they cover all insurers and wont recommend any specific plan just because they cover it. money spent on a broker is money well spend in malaysis IF they know what they are doing - i never tried one so i cant vouch for them. but i would choose them over an agent any time:

i found those two that do personal insurance so far:

1) http://www.protac.com.my/

2) http://www.anika.com.my/

might be of help to anyone thinking about cover and looking for a professional advise. free advise can always get here though wink.gif
allenultra
post Aug 22 2009, 01:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh



All 16 insurance companies has confirmed that death and hospitalisation due to H1n1 is covered under their protection plan. smile.gif

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=...1948&sec=nation

This post has been edited by allenultra: Aug 22 2009, 01:32 PM
mtsen
post Aug 24 2009, 12:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 18 2009, 03:19 PM)
mtsen,

i am not sure about the investment part. i gives a potentially false sense of security. i prefer to know what i really have to pay and go along with it. furthermore if PRU is publishing the average premium due subject to investment results, its lowering the perceived premiums to some degree by incorperating expected profits. it effectivel clouds the actual costs of the insurance. i am also not sure how the problem of medical inflation is handled here. the way i see it is that this policy is not transparent. c.o.o.l might be of great help in sheding some light to the actual costs though.
i however dont like it when costs are placed in a way that is mostly uncomparable to the general public. it keeps people from beeing able to compare apple to apple.
*
From my experiences with Prudential, their ILPs are very transparent. One can find out exactly what was paid for coverage, what type of coverages and what goes to investment and admin fees etc. Sometimes it is this transparency causing ppl to not like it while actually all fees also exist in whole life and endowment but not exposed. Prudential tried very hard to train all agents to keep up with the complexity in ILP but not everyone truly understand how the premium is calculated. But the system is there and transparency is there too ...

if a malaysian wants to buy an investment link policy, the only obvious choice to go for is Prudential now due to its large market share in this aspect. some related details at http://malaysiapersonalfinance.blogspot.co...utual-fund.html

others are catching up but none is brave enough to shift the whole focus like Prudential did.

QUOTE(Vitorbarbosa @ Aug 18 2009, 11:41 PM)
Why say 100? I heard from a prudential agent that all prudential medical card covers H1N1 as they do not have the exclusion on the communicable disease requires quarantine by law.

And Mr. Prudential, I think your 100 figure is very misleading. It might be best if you do not answer to that unless you are right.

MTsen, to be honest, I'm not sure how many needs to be hospitalised before the insurance company says no. At this moment, what I know in the industry is that, although there is this exclusion clause in the policy, most insurers still willing to pay for H1N1 cases.

I really can't answer you on that as that is out of my area of expertise (risk management + claims experience + future experience + shareholder's money + company's position + .... + ...)

But I thought death from H1N1 is covered? Only medical plan is not covered (according to the T & C but heard still covered at this moment).
*
how about group term insurance, I think its quite safe to say group term medical insurance may stop paying when more than 30% of the insured are making claims all at the same time ?


Added on August 24, 2009, 1:08 pmits good news h1n1 is covered but I doubt its the normal practice. its more like a good gesture that they do for the public while the risk isn't that high.

this issue was raised to local insurers more than 6 months ago, if it is a simple surely covered case, public announcement would have been made by then. but it didn't. It took the whole LIAM to sit down to make a decision. so it is clearly an exclusion they need to talk before they announced. Furthermore, the timing of announcement is right after 'cure' was found !?

some insurer actually did explain a few months ago h1n1 is one of the examples they don't have to pay and then follow by 'don't worry, we will still pay for now'

i don't think h1n1 will change insurer's position but I also know eventually one of the flu mutation will wipe clean human race ... I just wonder if it happens within my lifetime or yours smile.gif

This post has been edited by mtsen: Aug 24 2009, 01:08 PM
mtsen
post Aug 26 2009, 08:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(prudential @ Aug 25 2009, 07:11 AM)
but some brokers are tend to suggest you with certain insurers as they have MOU with the insurers.
*
ofcourse we still need a brain of our own when we read their analysed report biggrin.gif
PJusa
post Aug 26 2009, 04:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
i agree with mtsen - if you cant even read a report or dont want to bother to read then then you simply cant be helped.

IF a broker would indeed be impartial they would be in violation of their code of conduct now? (you can read it here: http://www.mitba.org.my/consumers.php)

i think what you refer to is the fact that a broker can send millions of premiums to the insurer - and they can thus use their negotiating power and get better deals on some products with some insurers.

if you have information that indicates otherwise please do let us know. so far the info you provided was merely a statement without any foundation. i'd be interested to see if you can substantiate it smile.gif
mtsen
post Aug 26 2009, 07:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


actually even if the adviser did a good and perfectly neutral job, if the consumers didn't try to understand the least, they will still ended up not satisfied with the adviser eventually, especially when another adviser is trying to pinch the consumers away ... this type of consumers, which is 80% of us, will eventually ended up in the less financial independent types ...


Added on August 26, 2009, 7:45 pmAnika is indeed working with a few insurers to provide 'solutions' ... it is highly NOT possible they did not get any profit share from that.

not sure about protac thao.

as of whether they may provide bias recommendation, its hard to say. There are careful ways to suggest a solution of my preference without violating any code of conduct ...

This post has been edited by mtsen: Aug 26 2009, 07:45 PM
joYJ
post Aug 27 2009, 02:16 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Aug 19 2009, 02:15 PM)
hi,

due to the fact that there seems to be a lot of doubt regarding H1N1 i would like to let you guys know that i called AXA, Allianz and Tokio Marine earlier. They all related this clarification which I will post here for your information:

1) The quarantine clause does not mean the insurance will not pay if you get H1N1 and need to be hospitalised. It means you will not be covered by your insurance IF you are quarantined for the costs of the quarantine if your are not infected.

2) If you are hospitalised due to H1N1 you are covered as to the limitations of the respective policy. There is no question about this.

3) If you are not hospitalised but get H1N1 you are not covered UNLESS you have outpatient benefits. Outpatient benefits would also cover H1N1. The medical plans in malaysia usually cover only H&S costs.

4) No insurer can or will start to exclude H1N1 cover from any policies in force as per above due to "too many cases". There is no such thing as a restrospective exclusion. Also all three insurers assured me they will not start to put exclusions into new policy blankets. Of course this is no written guarantee but I would have been surprised if they would have said anything else to be honest.

I hope this puts you guys at ease a bit.

IF any insurer decides to give their insured better cover and also cover the costs of H1N1 unrelated to H&S then even better. Otherwise there is no need to make any bulletin as the one from Mr. Yem - its understood and part of exisiting contracts. there never was any doubt about the cover to begin with.
*
Hi PJusa,

Even in AIA, there are 2 standalone critical illness plan:

1) Critical Illness Shield - this was offered thru worksite distribution channel meaning there needs to be minimum sign-up of 10 pax, payment mode thru payroll deduction can be monthly. if through credit card, the payment shd be made semi-annual or annually. If you want to get this, you can also seek for distribution channel like life insurance brokers as they would already have minimum annual commitment to the insurer for them to distribute the product. The premium rate would be exactly the same as getting it from aia

2) Healthguard @55 - this product can be offered can be bought individually. Premium is slightly more expensive but has additional features

Both are standalone products
Strengths: Premium is level upon entry age. The younger you are, the premium is cheaper but does not change as you get older. Secondly, both product pays only till 55 and you remain covered till 70 years old

Just let me know shall you require further info
joY


Added on August 27, 2009, 2:41 pm
QUOTE(mtsen @ Aug 26 2009, 07:41 PM)
actually even if the adviser did a good and perfectly neutral job, if the consumers didn't try to understand the least, they will still ended up not satisfied with the adviser eventually, especially when another adviser is trying to pinch the consumers away ... this type of consumers, which is 80% of us, will eventually ended up in the less financial independent types ...


Added on August 26, 2009, 7:45 pmAnika is indeed working with a few insurers to provide 'solutions' ... it is highly NOT possible they did not get any profit share from that.

not sure about protac thao.

as of whether they may provide bias recommendation, its hard to say.  There are careful ways to suggest a solution of my preference without violating any code of conduct ...
*
Hi mtsen,

yes agree with you that as consumers we must put some effort to understand eventhough consultation is given by a reputable source. Each of us have individual needs and considerations to be made before making a decision thus getting more info and understanding of the subject matter would help a lot

As for brokers services, currently in the market, there are 34 insurance brokers and besides being registered under bank negara, they are also under the association IBAM. Under the BNM ruling, all brokers have a code of ethnics to follow whereby they are representing the clients needs to provide the best solution to their needs. Sometimes, the solution could be a combination of products from a few insurer

As to whether they could be bias, they could to a certain extent but it pretty much depends on the professionalism of the indiv broker.

I have been working with insurance company and now I'm a life insurance broker but long-term customer satisfaction is still my utmost priority now. There's no point if we're in for fast sales, but customers these days are educated and discerning. Bad publicity from one disappointed customer would kill our reputation. With all being said, if you're interested to get consultation on any insurance matters, you can contact me

rgds
joY

This post has been edited by joYJ: Aug 27 2009, 02:41 PM
eses
post Aug 28 2009, 10:26 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
i got a medical card from a reputable insurance company..my mom had cancer and i got some benign tumor removed 2 years go..but in the policy there's small notes saying i wont be covered for breast cancer or any future complication from so called tumor..so my question is..how can i be covered?do i need to buy some new insurance specifically to cover me from this herited cancer?
thx
c.o.o.l
post Aug 28 2009, 02:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
eses,
For your case, even if you apply another company's insurance, the exclusion will likely to be included in the policy.
This is why we need to buy insurance when we are healthy.
jeff_v2
post Sep 2 2009, 09:45 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
965 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


im in looking for a good medical insurance.
priority must have medical card so i dont need to pay when hospitalize.
any recomendation? i know there are many agent out there rite. pm me ya
leecy
post Sep 2 2009, 11:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


I have PM you .
lltyyy
post Sep 5 2009, 03:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
Im looking for medical card for my mom. Any recommendations? She is now at age 43.
allenultra
post Sep 5 2009, 05:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh



QUOTE(lltyyy @ Sep 5 2009, 03:04 PM)
Im looking for medical card for my mom. Any recommendations? She is now at age 43.
*
Budget?

I guess budget will basically narrow to certain medical card.

What kind of annual/lifetime limit you looking for?
As I see nowadays, some cards have very high annual limit but with restriction on kidney dialysis/cancer treatment whereas some cards with decent annual/lifetime limit but apply "reasonable and customary charges" for kidney dialysis/cancer treatment.
And some medical card can enroll into all kind of hospital as they don't practice "panel hospital" anymore. It will come handy especially during emergency.
lltyyy
post Sep 5 2009, 10:12 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(allenultra @ Sep 5 2009, 05:18 PM)
Budget?

I guess budget will basically narrow to certain medical card.

What kind of annual/lifetime limit you looking for?
As I see nowadays, some cards have very high annual limit but with restriction on kidney dialysis/cancer treatment whereas some cards with decent annual/lifetime limit but apply "reasonable and customary charges" for kidney dialysis/cancer treatment.
And some medical card can enroll into all kind of hospital as they don't practice "panel hospital" anymore. It will come handy especially during emergency.
*
Budget should be about 2k/year.
Not sure about annual/lifetime limit. How to determine that?
leecy
post Sep 5 2009, 11:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


Can get a standalone medical card. I would recommend you for a medical card room & board 200-300 per day. Kidney dialysis and cancer treatment as charged.Life time limit and annual limit should be high enough to cover medical cost, hospitalization cost, surgery cost and etc.
Lifetime limit around 640,000 or 480,000 to annual limit of 120,000 and 160,000.I am an agent with Great Eastern.
jutamind
post Sep 17 2009, 11:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,429 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
does anyone has the premium table for the medical plan that is attached to Allianz Powerlink ILP? appreciate it if you can attach it here
Gen-X
post Sep 18 2009, 02:15 AM

Lifetime LYN Member
Group Icon
Elite
8,601 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL

QUOTE(leecy @ Sep 5 2009, 11:13 PM)
I would recommend you for a medical card room & board 200-300 per day. Kidney dialysis and cancer treatment as charged.Life time limit and annual limit should be high enough to cover medical cost, hospitalization cost, surgery cost and etc.
*
Yah, always ensure your policy covers Kidney Dialysis and Cancer Treatment as charged as these items cost a bom. Cancer maybe not so bad if you have a big sum for critical illness to pay for the treatment as one won't be alive long if not detected during the early stage .... but dialysis you will need it to stay alive.

Also ask agent to explain co-inssured terms and conditions if any and ask your agent about medicine cost i.e. bill for medicine after leaving the hospital. Also ask up to what age you are inssured as nowadays it is common that most live up to 80 and above.

This post has been edited by Gen-X: Sep 18 2009, 02:16 AM
ANNIENTN
post Sep 26 2009, 06:15 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(samowong @ Jul 20 2009, 05:36 PM)
Yalor yalor, i got two medic card also... Not kiasu..but kia si !!! hahaha
*
Hi,

How many medical card can holding by every individual?

In your case you are holding 2 cards. Its there any alternative, can we choose to upgrade room and board on the exisitng medical plan? rolleyes.gif





Colaboy
post Sep 27 2009, 12:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


QUOTE(ANNIENTN @ Sep 26 2009, 06:15 PM)
Hi,

How many medical card can holding by every individual?

In your case you are holding 2 cards. Its there any alternative, can we choose to upgrade room and board on the exisitng medical plan? rolleyes.gif
*
having 2 med card meaning you can claim from the 2nd card if the anual limit/ lifetime limit runs out if the bill amount is too huge
of course you can upgrade ur card to a higher plan
cenkudu
post Oct 17 2009, 06:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,206 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
My company already provide me with a medical card under group insurance and hospitalization scheme. However the coverage is very limited for example; room RM 80 per day and annual limit of RM 15 000. I'm not sure about renewal and lifetime limit etc coz every year they will say coverage will be continued under this insurance company and in the policy didn't mentioned about lifetime limit.

every year they will give an option to upgrade the coverage for example my employer give a basic plan D and we can pay extra for plan C,B or A. My question do I need another medical card or just upgrade the policy to get greater coverage?
numbertwo
post Oct 19 2009, 06:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(cenkudu @ Oct 17 2009, 06:52 PM)
My company already provide me with a medical card under group insurance and hospitalization scheme. However the coverage is very limited for example; room RM 80 per day and annual limit of RM 15 000. I'm not sure about renewal and lifetime limit etc coz every year they will say coverage will be continued under this insurance company and in the policy didn't mentioned about lifetime limit.

every year they will give an option to upgrade the coverage for example my employer give a basic plan D and we can pay extra for plan C,B or A. My question do I need another medical card or just upgrade the policy to get greater coverage?
*
you may compare these 2 options to see which one suits you more:
1. pay extra to upgrade the existing plan..
2. pay extra to buy another medical card from other co. that has 'deductible' option.
vandoren
post Oct 20 2009, 10:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
488 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


QUOTE(cenkudu @ Oct 17 2009, 06:52 PM)
My company already provide me with a medical card under group insurance and hospitalization scheme. However the coverage is very limited for example; room RM 80 per day and annual limit of RM 15 000. I'm not sure about renewal and lifetime limit etc coz every year they will say coverage will be continued under this insurance company and in the policy didn't mentioned about lifetime limit.

every year they will give an option to upgrade the coverage for example my employer give a basic plan D and we can pay extra for plan C,B or A. My question do I need another medical card or just upgrade the policy to get greater coverage?
*
hi cenkudu,

can you tell if the medical card still belongs to you even after you resign from the company.
if yes, i would recommend you to upgrade
if not, you better get yourself another medical card.
A1700
post Oct 21 2009, 12:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


Hi,
I'm quite interested the Allianz EB MediShield Plus, which included out-patient treatment benefits. what do you thinks?

I plan to buy for my family.


http://www.alliancebank.com.my/banc_alliancemedcareplus.html

This post has been edited by A1700: Oct 21 2009, 12:25 AM
allenultra
post Oct 21 2009, 09:12 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh



QUOTE(A1700 @ Oct 21 2009, 12:24 AM)
Hi,
I'm quite interested the Allianz EB MediShield Plus, which included out-patient treatment benefits. what do you thinks?

I plan to buy for my family.
http://www.alliancebank.com.my/banc_alliancemedcareplus.html
*
AFAIK, most of the medical card out there includes out-patient treatment benefit.

You just need to locate a medical card with good benefit yet affordable price.
Benefit such as, recognised by many [almost all if not all] hospital throughout Malaysia, top-up plan available, etc.
rakyat
post Oct 21 2009, 10:17 AM

I got stars
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: USJ


QUOTE(A1700 @ Oct 21 2009, 12:24 AM)
Hi,
I'm quite interested the Allianz EB MediShield Plus, which included out-patient treatment benefits. what do you thinks?

I plan to buy for my family.
http://www.alliancebank.com.my/banc_alliancemedcareplus.html
*
oii mana ada out-patient treatment? Its EMERGENCY ACCIDENTAL out-patient-lo doh.gif

Like that most H&S policies oso got......

What out-patient benefits most ppl are lookin for is 'clinical cover' to cover medical bills even if there is no surgical or overnight stay involve.

This is a rare and expensive cover cos ins. co. sure loss $$.
A1700
post Oct 21 2009, 08:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(rakyat @ Oct 21 2009, 10:17 AM)
oii mana ada out-patient treatment? Its EMERGENCY ACCIDENTAL out-patient-lo  doh.gif

Like that most H&S policies oso got......

What out-patient benefits most ppl are lookin for is 'clinical cover' to cover medical bills even if there is no surgical or overnight stay involve.

This is a rare and expensive cover cos ins. co. sure loss $$.
*
Thanks for your advise, Bro.
Do you have any recomendation? I'm still seaching, as too many companies offer medical card, do not know which is the best deal?

limj881128
post Oct 22 2009, 11:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
64 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(A1700 @ Oct 21 2009, 08:06 PM)
Thanks for your advise, Bro.
Do you have any recomendation? I'm still seaching, as too many companies offer medical card, do not know which is the best deal?
*
if you do interested in looking for medical card, can pm me, im from Hong Leong Assurance biggrin.gif
constant
post Nov 1 2009, 10:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
171 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Read about Mutual Life Plus 2. Is it true you need to invest 10 times the annual premium in mutual funds before you can take up the coverage? Basically, I find the premiums very reasonable compared to others. Any complaints or comments on this?
ahnien
post Nov 1 2009, 10:33 PM

PanDA Enthusiast
*******
Senior Member
2,308 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(cenkudu @ Oct 17 2009, 06:52 PM)
My company already provide me with a medical card under group insurance and hospitalization scheme. However the coverage is very limited for example; room RM 80 per day and annual limit of RM 15 000. I'm not sure about renewal and lifetime limit etc coz every year they will say coverage will be continued under this insurance company and in the policy didn't mentioned about lifetime limit.

every year they will give an option to upgrade the coverage for example my employer give a basic plan D and we can pay extra for plan C,B or A. My question do I need another medical card or just upgrade the policy to get greater coverage?
*
why not review your current plan with the option to upgrade it.
and have some other options to get another comprehensive one? which ever suits you smile.gif

i jus dont like the idea of topping up. dunno why. haha..... hmm.gif
cuz the plans n coverages changes and update by time. so practically, i feel tat toping up is like paying more to get the samething of the pass, NOW.

i might be wrong though laugh.gif
epalbee3
post Nov 1 2009, 10:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
I only need medical card and CI covering about (RM150 & RM100k).

Please help to give me a quote.


bingozero
post Nov 3 2009, 02:38 AM

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
Hi,
I want to know more about medical card, and why type of insurance that I want suitable for me, currently 25 years old.
And which insurance company is good for service?
gavin_lim
post Nov 3 2009, 03:18 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
149 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: KL, PJ


QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 1 2009, 10:55 PM)
I only need medical card and CI covering about (RM150 & RM100k).

Please help to give me a quote.
*
Hi:
Please provide your age, sex, occupation & are you smoking so that I can quote your premium.
SUSOptiplex330
post Nov 14 2009, 10:50 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
I was told, if you have a automatic renewal medical insurance and you made a claim, the insurance company can increase your subsequent year's insurance premium and no longer based on some pre-defined rate table. True or false?

andrekua
post Nov 15 2009, 02:01 AM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Anyone with PruHealth?

I was at SCB and bump into a friend who was working there. She intro me a Prudential insurance agent. Im not into buying insurance for myself just yet. Its for my newborn baby.

Im quite tempted as the RM200 package covers 75k per annum with a lifetime of 750k upto 24years old. NCB at RM300 per year. It also include an investment savings of RM50 per month. The NCB will be credited into the investment savings as well. The investment savings can be withdraw anytime but not till 0. CI and TPD can be adjusted accordingly. Even include insurance that will pay itself if Im dead or my wife is dead. In the event of both parents also dead, one will be used to cover the premium and another will be credited into the investment savings account.

Good bor?
Colaboy
post Nov 15 2009, 10:38 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


QUOTE(andrekua @ Nov 15 2009, 02:01 AM)
Anyone with PruHealth?

I was at SCB and bump into a friend who was working there. She intro me a Prudential insurance agent. Im not into buying insurance for myself just yet. Its for my newborn baby.

Im quite tempted as the RM200 package covers 75k per annum with a lifetime of 750k upto 24years old. NCB at RM300 per year. It also include an investment savings of RM50 per month. The NCB will be credited into the investment savings as well. The investment savings can be withdraw anytime but not till 0. CI and TPD can be adjusted accordingly. Even include insurance that will pay itself if Im dead or my wife is dead. In the event of both parents also dead, one will be used to cover the premium and another will be credited into the investment savings account.

Good bor?
*
of course good la . . . product & company is good no doubt thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
if you manage buy from a fulltimer & a good agent than its perfect
cuebiz
post Nov 15 2009, 11:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
992 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(andrekua @ Nov 15 2009, 02:01 AM)
Anyone with PruHealth?

I was at SCB and bump into a friend who was working there. She intro me a Prudential insurance agent. Im not into buying insurance for myself just yet. Its for my newborn baby.

Good bor?
*
You should buy insurance for yourself first before considering for your baby.
epalbee3
post Nov 16 2009, 11:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
I just bought a PA and medical card insurance.

It cost me RM520++ annually.

The coverage is RM125k (PA) and RM210k (medical).

The annual limit is RM75k, with room rate of RM150/day.

Please advise if my coverage is good enough.
p3nang
post Nov 17 2009, 09:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


is ur medical under general insurance? or life?
if it is general, it is advisable to change to life.
because it might not be guaranteed renewable.
PJusa
post Nov 17 2009, 11:42 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
i dont agree - in general you always (see posts before) fare better with a general insurance IF it is guaranteed renewable. selling someone who is looking for medical cover a life insurance is bad advice if you ask me. those are entirely different products and you pay for stuff you dont want without having any substantial benefits from the product. the agent though is getting a higher comission %-wise and the premium is usually much higher.

your package seems priced OK even though i dont know your age epalbee3. you should however consider a higher life/annual limit for medical cover since a serious illness might cost more than your cover can provide. also a lifetime limit means you will eat this up over time and at one point stand without coverage. better to take a cover without lifetime limit if you can afford it. you can look around what offers are around or let me know your budget and i let know what insurers offer a pack that fits your pocket (no charge, no agent)
epalbee3
post Nov 17 2009, 12:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
well.. it is a trade-off between premium and coverage.

I'm looking for a moderate coverage which costs moderately.

Kurnia insurance provides a renewable package up to 70 years, which is the normal case for medical insurance.
I guess if you want to protect up to 100 years, you got to go for CI insurance. (I don't know what is the price.)

For your information, to get up to RM150k/RM450k limit, you will have to pay twice of RM520 = RM 1000+. (where as the premium keep increasing every five years)

If looking from other perspective, we are already better than previous generations who do not have any coverage, but live happily..
Buying one just to keep us free of mind as you know nobody will lend you money.


Added on November 17, 2009, 12:25 pm
QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 17 2009, 12:13 PM)
well.. it is a trade-off between premium and coverage.

I'm looking for a moderate coverage which costs moderately.

Kurnia insurance provides a renewable package up to 70 years, which is the normal case for medical insurance.
I guess if you want to protect up to 100 years, you got to go for CI insurance. (I don't know what is the price.)

For your information, to get up to RM150k/RM450k limit, you will have to pay twice of RM520 = RM 1000+. (where as the premium keep increasing every five years)

If looking from other perspective, we are already better than previous generations who do not have any coverage, but live happily..
Buying one just to keep us free of mind as you know nobody will lend you money.
*
Anyway, for those afford, please buy as much as you can.

In future, may be we can still upgrade the current plan.


Added on November 17, 2009, 1:14 pmBy the way, anyone know if there is a CI plan with RM50k coverage until 100 years old? standalone product.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 17 2009, 01:14 PM
PJusa
post Nov 17 2009, 01:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
epalbee3,

ok - one thing first: dont confuse CI and health insurance.

CI pays a lump sum amount in case of diagnostic and survival of one of the 36 "dread deseases". there is no additional benefit to this insurance and premium will go through the roof once you get older. you should use a CI (if you really want to) only while you are young and the risk is low. that way CI can serve as a means of providing a financial cushion should you be unable to work further or in case you die provide relief to your family.

H&S (hospitalisation and surgical insurance) on the other hand pays your bills up the limit. the scope is pretty much that - hospital and surgery + some after care. this is what you need to focus on. if your H&S stops at 70 and you life longer who is paying the bills. i personally would want 80 or 100 for my H&S. CI can stop at 55 imho and cover can even decrease with age to provide adequate cover throughout time with low cost.

problem is: medical insurance will be damn expensive at 70++ so few insurance companies offer them. for example AXA, GE, AIA have plans that cover until 80 or 100. what you need to look at is the average costs until the end of the cover from your current age onwards. if you can afford the resulting average premium today, chances are you will be able to keep the policy in force despite inflation driving the premiums even higher in the future.

and yes: buy as much medical cover as you can afford smile.gif.

my personal choice is H&S and PA over H&S and CI because PA covers more cases at a fixed price and high H&S covers the dread deseases too. CI is fine between 20 and 50 though but not entirely essential if you ask me.

that beeing said, i'd look into ways of increasing your annual H&S cover if you have the budget to spare. for example a so called top-up insurance with a high deductable is a very cost efficient solution to cover spikes. premium will be only a couple of 100 RM even for a 150k p.a. / 750 k lifetime extra cover.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Nov 17 2009, 01:22 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 17 2009, 03:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 17 2009, 01:20 PM)
epalbee3,

ok - one thing first: dont confuse CI and health insurance.

CI pays a lump sum amount in case of diagnostic and survival of one of the 36 "dread deseases". there is no additional benefit to this insurance and premium will go through the roof once you get older. you should use a CI (if you really want to) only while you are young and the risk is low. that way CI can serve as a means of providing a financial cushion should you be unable to work further or in case you die provide relief to your family.

H&S (hospitalisation and surgical insurance) on the other hand pays your bills up the limit. the scope is pretty much that - hospital and surgery + some after care. this is what you need to focus on. if your H&S stops at 70 and you life longer who is paying the bills. i personally would want 80 or 100 for my H&S. CI can stop at 55 imho and cover can even decrease with age to provide adequate cover throughout time with low cost.

problem is: medical insurance will be damn expensive at 70++ so few insurance companies offer them. for example AXA, GE, AIA have plans that cover until 80 or 100. what you need to look at is the average costs until the end of the cover from your current age onwards. if you can afford the resulting average premium today, chances are you will be able to keep the policy in force despite inflation driving the premiums even higher in the future.

and yes: buy as much medical cover as you can afford smile.gif.

my personal choice is H&S and PA over H&S and CI because PA covers more cases at a fixed price and high H&S covers the dread deseases too. CI is fine between 20 and 50 though but not entirely essential if you ask me.

that beeing said, i'd look into ways of increasing your annual H&S cover if you have the budget to spare. for example a so called top-up insurance with a high deductable is a very cost efficient solution to cover spikes. premium will be only a couple of 100 RM even for a 150k p.a. / 750 k lifetime extra cover.
*
mind to share the price of "AXA, GE, AIA" for 80 and 100?
Let's say if monthly need RM500++ then they will be no point, as during the old age, you might not be able to pay for this.

AAM does offer CI (50k) at a reasonable annual premium of RM80-200 for < age of 45 years old. After that it is like a few thousands.
It is no harm to buy it while young.

But you are right, if we have money, why dun top up the medical insurance.

I think as long as you have some medical coverage, you can cover some emergency situation where government hospital cannot give immediate treatment. After that, may be you have to rely on government hospital.

After all, we have our own current aims to achieve everyday, it will not make sense to pay too much for this.


Added on November 17, 2009, 4:06 pmAIA only up to 70 years old.

I am quite surprised with AXA which offers unlimited coverage. Anyone experience with them before?

GE MEDICARE 100 is the only one that gives protection until 100 years.

Mind to share more about this?


Added on November 17, 2009, 4:18 pmone more comment: AXA limits the amount per disability which may not be good for long year problem..

Anyone shares about GE Medicare 100?

For kurnia, you can apply for medicare senior once you reach 50 years old.


Added on November 17, 2009, 10:09 pmOne more comments:

Even with > 70 years medical insurance, I will not buy.

from 70 - 100 years, you got to pay about 200k premium.

If you have that money, you don't need medical insurance.

If not, you better use that money to feed yourself.

Remember, after retirement, every cent is hard to recover.

Medical insurance is just for those with money, not those without money.

Before you buy medical insurance after 70 years, make sure you have well-plan your retirement.

Without proper retirement plan, there is no point talking about senior medical insurance.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 17 2009, 10:09 PM
PJusa
post Nov 18 2009, 12:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
epalbee3,

from AXA you can use smartcare optimum (no life time limit, cover until 80). depending on the cover you choose you will end up with an average premium of around 50-300 RM per month for 35-80.

B.Health Net offers no lifetime limit, but only until 70

same for OAC Easi-Health

others offer waiver of lifetime limit for a fee.

GE MEDICARE 100 and Manucare100 both offer until 100 but the premium runs into 10s of thousands when you hit 80+ and this makes it totally unaffordable. i remember manulife is charging like 30 or 40 k for age 90 p.a.

if you ask me why the premium is so high? it's because this is the average damage plus a fee for the insurance that they expect you to cost them. so you should also expect that you yourself will have to pay this amount. if desaster strikes it will be higher though since the insurance only charges the average cost. so for a secure average damage you get protection from higher costs. still a fair deal to me unless you know you will cost less than average.

btw: you have a point with axa's limit per disability. but if you look at the shedule, there are no such specific limits as they cover full subject to custom and reasonable charges. i believe this clause applies to the additional benefits (kidney dialysis and cancer treatment) only. maybe someone from axa can confirm?
klang-valley
post Nov 18 2009, 10:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: Petaling Jaya


I agree with you that we need to have proper retirement plan for our future. Medical insurance is way so expensive when we are old, but if you have plan your savings at a much early age, this should help to offset some of the high cost.
numbertwo
post Nov 19 2009, 03:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 17 2009, 03:22 PM)

I am quite surprised with AXA which offers unlimited coverage. Anyone experience with them before?

GE MEDICARE 100 is the only one that gives protection until 100 years.

Mind to share more about this?


Added on November 17, 2009, 4:18 pmone more comment: AXA limits the amount per disability which may not be good for long year problem..

As per AXA contract, this is the definition of 'per disability'

11. Disability Shall mean a Sickness, Disease, Illness or the
entire Injuries arising of a single or continuous series of causes. ANY ONE DISABILITY shall
mean all of the periods of disability arising from the same cause including any and all
complications there from except that if the Insured Person completely recovers and
remain free from further treatment (including drugs, medicines, special diet or injection or
advice for the condition) of the disability for at least ninety (90) days following the latest date
of discharge and subsequent disability from the same cause shall be considered as though it
were a new disability.


If you have an existing medical plan, you can opt for "Deductible' Option in AXA SC Optimum plan.
Bad thing about AXA, the way I rate them, is their limited lifetime limits on kidney/cancer treatments. That's why their premium is affordable yet still gives you 'unlimited' lifetime limit.

I'vent been able to update my site, but maybe some info is helpful from within : http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Medi...aysia/message/2

Rgrds
PJusa
post Nov 19 2009, 08:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

correct about the definition - i have the wordings too. but the question is: since there are no limits besides the annual limit besides for cancer / dialysis how does this clause affect the insured for other disabilities besides cancer and dialysis? the way i read it it doesnt affect you since there is no specified monetary limit present.
epalbee3
post Nov 19 2009, 11:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Nov 19 2009, 03:48 PM)
As per AXA contract, this is the definition of 'per disability'

11. Disability Shall mean a Sickness, Disease, Illness or the
entire Injuries arising of a single or continuous series of causes. ANY ONE DISABILITY shall
mean all of the periods of disability arising from the same cause including any and all
complications there from except that if the Insured Person completely recovers and
remain free from further treatment (including drugs, medicines, special diet or injection or
advice for the condition) of the disability for at least ninety (90) days following the latest date
of discharge and subsequent disability from the same cause shall be considered as though it
were a new disability.


If you have an existing medical plan, you can opt for "Deductible' Option in AXA SC Optimum plan.
Bad thing about AXA, the way I rate them, is their limited lifetime limits on kidney/cancer treatments.  That's why their premium is affordable yet still gives you 'unlimited' lifetime limit.

I'vent been able to update my site, but maybe some info is helpful from within : http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Medi...aysia/message/2

Rgrds
*
so this is the weakness of AXA policy, which is not good for long-term treatments.

again. no point buying medical insurance after 70 as premium is very high.


Added on November 19, 2009, 11:35 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 19 2009, 08:21 PM)
numbertwo,

correct about the definition - i have the wordings too. but the question is: since there are no limits besides the annual limit besides for cancer / dialysis how does this clause affect the insured for other disabilities besides cancer and dialysis? the way i read it it doesnt affect you since there is no specified monetary limit present.
*
PJusa, there is a limit of 150 days hospitalization per disability.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 19 2009, 11:35 PM
numbertwo
post Nov 20 2009, 09:27 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 19 2009, 11:33 PM)
so this is the weakness of AXA policy, which is not good for long-term treatments.

again. no point buying medical insurance after 70 as premium is very high.


Added on November 19, 2009, 11:35 pm

PJusa, there is a limit of 150 days hospitalization per disability.
*
agree with you on the med insurance after 70... I never bother to consider this point when I compare med policies as I really do not think I can afford one by that time I'm 70's...and no I don't want my children to pay for it either...when time comes, if I have to go I have to go... biggrin.gif
PJusa
post Nov 20 2009, 01:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
thanks for the pointer. i never saw it in conjunction with the 150days. that is a serious loophole. i am running AXA in combination with a top-up so i am pretty save in that respect and since both policies have serious weeknesses that dont really overlap (i.e. AXA 150 days, tokio marine 10k deductable) the combination of the two still seems to be a very attractively priced round coverage.

sadly so far i have not come across a better solution to overcome lifetime limit issues and fee issues i.e. premiums that are out of reach of the insured. anyone has a better solution besides going for an international insurance?


Added on November 20, 2009, 2:04 pmquick update: william russel has an office in malaysia.

http://www.william-russell.com/individuals...ntial/benefits/

this plan might be a good idea too as the limits that apply to local policies dont apply here.

if you choose this policy as a backup with a 2,500 US$ deductable you can insure a 33 yr old for around 50 US$ per month with a 200,000 US$ annual limit. that would be pretty good. will check what allianz offers these days.

This post has been edited by PJusa: Nov 20 2009, 02:04 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 09:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 20 2009, 01:40 PM)
thanks for the pointer. i never saw it in conjunction with the 150days. that is a serious loophole. i am running AXA in combination with a top-up so i am pretty save in that respect and since both policies have serious weeknesses that dont really overlap (i.e. AXA 150 days, tokio marine 10k deductable) the combination of the two still seems to be a very attractively priced round coverage.

sadly so far i have not come across a better solution to overcome lifetime limit issues and fee issues i.e. premiums that are out of reach of the insured. anyone has a better solution besides going for an international insurance?


Added on November 20, 2009, 2:04 pmquick update: william russel has an office in malaysia.

http://www.william-russell.com/individuals...ntial/benefits/

this plan might be a good idea too as the limits that apply to local policies dont apply here.

if you choose this policy as a backup with a 2,500 US$ deductable you can insure a 33 yr old for around 50 US$ per month with a 200,000 US$ annual limit. that would be pretty good. will check what allianz offers these days.
*
For William Russell, it is only for expatriates:

You are unable to get a quote if your Country of Residence is the same as your nationality, we can only insure expatriates

ltandrew
post Nov 21 2009, 09:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Hi All,

Is trher any plans that
a-cover specialist doctor visits
b-cover hospitalisations
c-other rest
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 10:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(ltandrew @ Nov 21 2009, 09:53 AM)
Hi All,

Is trher any plans that
a-cover specialist doctor visits
b-cover hospitalisations
c-other rest
*
Most medical cards cover this.

Try to buy from kurnia, AXA and etc.

I would say kurnia is ok.
ozak
post Nov 21 2009, 10:49 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,018 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 17 2009, 12:13 PM)
well.. it is a trade-off between premium and coverage.

I'm looking for a moderate coverage which costs moderately.

Kurnia insurance provides a renewable package up to 70 years, which is the normal case for medical insurance.
I guess if you want to protect up to 100 years, you got to go for CI insurance. (I don't know what is the price.)

For your information, to get up to RM150k/RM450k limit, you will have to pay twice of RM520 = RM 1000+. (where as the premium keep increasing every five years)

If looking from other perspective, we are already better than previous generations who do not have any coverage, but live happily..
Buying one just to keep us free of mind as you know nobody will lend you money.


Added on November 17, 2009, 12:25 pm

Anyway, for those afford, please buy as much as you can.

In future, may be we can still upgrade the current plan.


Added on November 17, 2009, 1:14 pmBy the way, anyone know if there is a CI plan with RM50k coverage until 100 years old? standalone product.
*
Maybe you can check with AIA. They have better deal. And cover till 100yrs.
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 10:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(ozak @ Nov 21 2009, 10:49 AM)
Maybe you can check with AIA. They have better deal. And cover till 100yrs.
*
I dun think medial insurance after 70 years is affordable if you do not have income.

Our previous conclusion is no point buying medical insurance after 70.


PJusa
post Nov 21 2009, 01:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
yeah too bad about william russel. but it seems allianzworldwidecare is available. at least i managed to a get an offer just fine. they have a pretty high end cover even on the lower plans and malaysia apparently enjoys some discount on the premium.

basic plan only around RM 400 per month. and this "Classic Individual" covers 1.25 million euros per year medical costs p.a. without any lifetime limit - take a look:

http://www.allianzworldwidecare.com/compar...duals?choice=en

annual premium for age 33 is €1,025.00 = RM 5000 = 416 p.m.

the optional outpatient is way too costly but the core plan is good. but hold your breath: premium at age 70 is €4,617 p.a.= 23k. if you compare this with local insurances that aint that bad considering the cover you get.

too bad they dont publish rates beyond 70, the support told me they cover until you die if you so wish but could not advise on premium due.

maybe one should ask them to offer a group plan for malaysia (lowyat medical plan wink.gif ) to get extra discount....
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 04:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 21 2009, 01:48 PM)
yeah too bad about william russel. but it seems allianzworldwidecare is available. at least i managed to a get an offer just fine. they have a pretty high end cover even on the lower plans and malaysia apparently enjoys some discount on the premium.

basic plan only around RM 400 per month. and this "Classic Individual" covers 1.25 million euros per year medical costs p.a. without any lifetime limit - take a look:

http://www.allianzworldwidecare.com/compar...duals?choice=en

annual premium for age 33 is €1,025.00 = RM 5000 = 416 p.m.

the optional outpatient is way too costly but the core plan is good. but hold your breath: premium at age 70 is €4,617 p.a.= 23k. if you compare this with local insurances that aint that bad considering the cover you get.

too bad they dont publish rates beyond 70, the support told me they cover until you die if you so wish but could not advise on premium due.

maybe one should ask them to offer a group plan for malaysia (lowyat medical plan wink.gif ) to get extra discount....
*
Ok, things come with a price.

RM416/month at young age is not something that within our limits. don't forget it is only for medical. how about PA?

Just buy kurnia, you got RM42 per month to enjoy reasonable coverage for PA and medical.

After that, you can put the rest of your money at ASW or AS1M, you should double your money within 20 years.
PJusa
post Nov 21 2009, 09:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
well what i like is the cover .... RM 5,000,000 is more than enough for any kind of hospitalisation that i can think. also no limit of number of days. i am not entirely sure if can afford or not but i got in touch with them nonetheless to make an offer for my family. hopefully some family discount can be given. since the plan is core only i would still need a local top up for dialysis - that seems to be not covered. waiting for reply from then on that.
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 10:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
my friend was offered a GE investment linked insurance with monthly 150 for 20 years.

he is now 30 years old. but medical insurance until 70 years old.
may I know how does he pay for medical insurance until 70?

Also the sum assured is RM35000 and CI is 20000 (until 100 years old). Does it mean 20000 is deducted from sum assured?does he able to get back money when he was 70 years old?


Added on November 21, 2009, 10:43 pm
QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 21 2009, 10:38 PM)
my friend was offered a GE investment linked insurance with monthly 150 for 20 years.

he is now 30 years old. but medical insurance until 70 years old.
may I know how does he pay for medical insurance until 70?

Also the sum assured is RM35000 and CI is 20000 (until 100 years old). Does it mean 20000 is deducted from sum assured?does he able to get back money when he was 70 years old?
*
Some of my friends said that if you are going to include medical insurance in the life policy, you usually will end up get nothing, paying all for medical premium. Is that true?

Since investment link is not guaranteed, usually policy will assume the best case, which you might face difficulty later? kindly advise.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 21 2009, 10:43 PM
myremi
post Nov 22 2009, 04:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


The thing about medical insurance is that it's good to have when you actually have health problems. So thinking that you end up paying for nothing, it's very small thing when you finally do have a health problem.

The earlier that you start medical insurance, the cheaper it will be in the long run. I see my parents now taking out insurance in the later part of their lives, they have to pay more than what they would have paid if they had started earlier. And the premium doesn't have to be in the high ranges. If you tell the insurance agent that your budget is low, they shoudl be able to give you a lower premium until you are able financially to pay more.

You may want to look for a policy that will cover both heart diseases and back problems. These may usually not be part of critical illnesses but it's popping up more regularly. Take it from someone who is experiencing both. It's expensive to treat.

The other thing is the cost of doing the medical tests. There's only a certain limit that the insurance will cover so gotta check if that covers it for you too.
epalbee3
post Nov 22 2009, 10:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(myremi @ Nov 22 2009, 04:24 AM)
The thing about medical insurance is that it's good to have when you actually have health problems. So thinking that you end up paying for nothing, it's very small thing when you finally do have a health problem.

The earlier that you start medical insurance, the cheaper it will be in the long run. I see my parents now taking out insurance in the later part of their lives, they have to pay more than what they would have paid if they had started earlier. And the premium doesn't have to be in the high ranges. If you tell the insurance agent that your budget is low, they shoudl be able to give you a lower premium until you are able financially to pay more.

You may want to look for a policy that will cover both heart diseases and back problems. These may usually not be part of critical illnesses but it's popping up more regularly. Take it from someone who is experiencing both. It's expensive to treat.

The other thing is the cost of doing the medical tests. There's only a certain limit that the insurance will cover so gotta check if that covers it for you too.
*
myremi, good say good say..

Insurance was invented with a good will for a group of people to share common risks.
It is good as long as you have achieve your objective of protection.


myremi
post Nov 22 2009, 07:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


Well, the golden years are below 30 years of age. After 30, that's when health problems start popping up and it's annoying when insurance or your company's health policy doesn't quite cover everything. Some ppl try SOCSO but even that is not a lot.

Hmm...and I think with the different types of insurance around, it's not easy to do the comparison. I remember spending 2 months just sitting down and trying to make head and tail on 10 different packages. 8 years ago, it was easy to decide what I wanted :

-best female coverage, especially during pregnancy and a newborn baby
-covered medical tests
-the various additional options
-the reputation of the company and whether I knew the agent

The insurance coverage we have here isn't as good as in the US or Europe but even then, even doing an operation is a big deal and that option may not necessarily be the best either.

I would say that it's hard to decide on the type of insurance to take without good friends to ask for advice.

I did get a prep talk from a friend recently that one of the Takaful funds is offering GPA insurance as part of the unit rates purchase and if one wanted to include the critical illnesses, they can pay for it but still at cheaper rates than what insurance companies are offering.
epalbee3
post Nov 22 2009, 10:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(myremi @ Nov 22 2009, 07:53 PM)
Well, the golden years are below 30 years of age. After 30, that's when health problems start popping up and it's annoying when insurance or your company's health policy doesn't quite cover everything. Some ppl try SOCSO but even that is not a lot.

Hmm...and I think with the different types of insurance around, it's not easy to do the comparison. I remember spending 2 months just sitting down and trying to make head and tail on 10 different packages. 8 years ago, it was easy to decide what I wanted :

-best female coverage, especially during pregnancy and a newborn baby
-covered medical tests
-the various additional options
-the reputation of the company and whether I knew the agent

The insurance coverage we have here isn't as good as in the US or Europe but even then, even doing an operation is a big deal and that option may not necessarily be the best either.

I would say that it's hard to decide on the type of insurance to take without good friends to ask for advice.

I did get a prep talk from a friend recently that one of the Takaful funds is offering GPA insurance as part of the unit rates purchase and if one wanted to include the critical illnesses, they can pay for it but still at cheaper rates than what insurance companies are offering.
*
well, as long as the purpose of protection is available, it should be ok.

I believe different people have different preferences. I would just take PA and Medical Insurance, the rest of the money I prefer to invest myself into AS1M and etc. In this case, you can get a ala-carte type of insurance you need. I do think that whoever afford should buy PA and medical insurance. The rest should be up to you.

Insurance is insurance, if you want to save money, put it at bank or ASN, and it is free.

And one more thing, you should consider have spent all the money you pay for insurance, as for investment link usually what you save will eventually go to pay your premium for medical insurance. so pay only what you afford as there is no return on investment whatever.



c.o.o.l
post Nov 23 2009, 11:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Yup, everyone have different views and needs on insurance, That is why there is so many variety of insurance in the market. Insurance plan is a product(a special product), and a product will only come out and keeps selling when there is demand.

And i agree that you should allocate portion of money that you afford to insurance. If the insurance plan makes you feels like it is a burden, then you should review your plan.
numbertwo
post Nov 23 2009, 07:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 21 2009, 10:38 PM)
my friend was offered a GE investment linked insurance with monthly 150 for 20 years.

he is now 30 years old. but medical insurance until 70 years old.
may I know how does he pay for medical insurance until 70?

Also the sum assured is RM35000 and CI is 20000 (until 100 years old). Does it mean 20000 is deducted from sum assured?does he able to get back money when he was 70 years old?


Added on November 21, 2009, 10:43 pm

Some of my friends said that if you are going to include medical insurance in the life policy, you usually will end up get nothing, paying all for medical premium. Is that true?

Since investment link is not guaranteed, usually policy will assume the best case, which you might face difficulty later? kindly advise.
*
ILP usually deducts the units from your investment portion of your policy in order to pay for the riders(ie. medical, CI, payor waiver, etc.) that are attached to the ILP. So, if the funds that you have chosen fails to 'shine', your premium will surely goes to paying the rest of the riders attached. And remember to ask the agent, does he know anything about 'Top-Up' cases in ILP. Top-up cases happen whenever the units in your investment funds are insufficient to pay for the cost of insurance+riders... , you will have to top-up a certain amount of money in your renewal. Many ILP policyholders are not aware of this 'feature' in ILP.. So pls take note.

So, yes, ILP's return is not guaranteed, never listen to any guarantee mentioned by the agent as ILP will never have any kind of 'guaranteed' return. What you gonna get after 20 years is all depending on the performance of the funds chosen in your ILP... Good luck.


Added on November 23, 2009, 7:30 pm
QUOTE(myremi @ Nov 22 2009, 04:24 AM)
The thing about medical insurance is that it's good to have when you actually have health problems. So thinking that you end up paying for nothing, it's very small thing when you finally do have a health problem.

The earlier that you start medical insurance, the cheaper it will be in the long run. I see my parents now taking out insurance in the later part of their lives, they have to pay more than what they would have paid if they had started earlier. And the premium doesn't have to be in the high ranges. If you tell the insurance agent that your budget is low, they shoudl be able to give you a lower premium until you are able financially to pay more.

You may want to look for a policy that will cover both heart diseases and back problems. These may usually not be part of critical illnesses but it's popping up more regularly. Take it from someone who is experiencing both. It's expensive to treat.

The other thing is the cost of doing the medical tests. There's only a certain limit that the insurance will cover so gotta check if that covers it for you too.
*
Hi myremi,

care to enlighten me how one would safe a few $$ if one took medical insurance in their early years... Med insurance are age-banded.. If you bought one at age 50 you will be charged at the banded rate at age 50. If you have bought one earlier say 40, you will still have to pay the same rate when you renew the policy at age 50. The scenario is the same as whether you are 'healthy' at the age of 50 . If there is a loading, it will happen irregardless whether you buy the policy at age 50 or age 40, still you will have to pay for some premium loading if you are not 100% fit & healthy.. Correct me if i'm wrong.

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Nov 23 2009, 07:30 PM
PJusa
post Nov 23 2009, 08:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
you save if you buy young if you choose a policy with guaranteed renewal w/o loading or exclusions. that way you get less than 100% but still pay the old premium whereas as a new customer you have to fork out extra or cant get cover at all.
epalbee3
post Nov 23 2009, 08:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Nov 23 2009, 07:24 PM)
ILP usually deducts the units from your investment portion of your policy in order to pay for the riders(ie. medical, CI, payor waiver, etc.) that are attached to the ILP.  So, if the funds that you have chosen fails to 'shine', your premium will surely goes to paying the rest of the riders attached.   And remember to ask the agent, does he know anything about 'Top-Up' cases in ILP.  Top-up cases happen whenever the units in your investment funds are insufficient to pay for the cost of insurance+riders... , you will have to top-up a certain amount of money in your renewal.  Many ILP policyholders are not aware of this 'feature' in ILP.. So pls take note.

So, yes, ILP's return is not guaranteed, never listen to any guarantee mentioned by the agent as ILP will never have any kind of 'guaranteed' return.   What you gonna get after 20 years is all depending on the performance of the funds chosen in your ILP...  Good luck.


Added on November 23, 2009, 7:30 pm

Hi myremi,

care to enlighten me how one would safe a few $$ if one took medical insurance in their early years...  Med insurance are age-banded.. If you bought one at age 50  you will be charged at the banded rate at age 50.  If you have bought one earlier say 40, you will still have to pay the same rate when you renew the policy at age 50.  The scenario is the same as whether you are 'healthy' at the age of 50 .  If there is a loading, it will happen irregardless whether you buy the policy at age 50 or age 40, still you will have to pay for some premium loading if you are not 100% fit & healthy..  Correct me if i'm wrong.
*
Yes, when people buy ILP, they usually thought that they will be able to recover a decent amount of money at the end of the policy.

In fact, most of the money will be spent and they will get nothing except protections.

It is in constrast with normal life insurance; however, normal life insurance also spend most of the money to pay for those premium, end up they get little at the end.

That's y people said, insurance is insurance, saving is saving. you will never get ROI for insurance; there is a premium you must pay.

I think when people say "when you buy younger you pay less" is something misleading, you buy younger you should pay more, but you get protection for longer periods.

The consumer must be smart enough, because all people will only show you the "very best case" when promoting a product to you. I say it is ok for those who are rich, but for those who merely can pay up the premium, they will end up getting something under their expectation.


Added on November 23, 2009, 8:17 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 23 2009, 08:10 PM)
you save if you buy young if you choose a policy with guaranteed renewal w/o loading or exclusions. that way you get less than 100% but still pay the old premium whereas as a new customer you have to fork out extra or cant get cover at all.
*
I thought for all product, the premium is not guaranteed after 4 years?

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 23 2009, 08:17 PM
PJusa
post Nov 23 2009, 09:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
it's not about premium guarantee. it's about ensuring you wont face a loading based on your personal claims. this will be the case with a number of general H&S plans and it's a good thing. it takes in a way into consideration that you joined in good health (low risk) and paid until now already if you wish to look at it this way smile.gif
epalbee3
post Nov 23 2009, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
kurnia no loading.
PJusa
post Nov 24 2009, 08:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
kurnia only no loading and guaranteed renewal until 65. thereafter subject to their decision and then you need to take their senior policy anyway. so it allows them many times to impose loading or exclusions when you really need insurance that takes you no matter what. useless if you ask me. also lifetime limit is very low in relation to annual limit (3x only).
epalbee3
post Nov 24 2009, 06:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 24 2009, 08:51 AM)
kurnia only no loading and guaranteed renewal until 65. thereafter subject to their decision and then you need to take their senior policy anyway. so it allows them many times to impose loading or exclusions when you really need insurance that takes you no matter what. useless if you ask me. also lifetime limit is very low in relation to annual limit (3x only).
*
yes, i agree with you. if you really so keen to renew until 80, you can switch to senior medical starting 50 years old. the premium is not different.

by the way, there is an idiom spoken by our seniors: "don't afraid you won't be able to buy something, as long as you have money".

I'm not looking for a perfect coverage either. RM 50 per month is just a nice figure.


blak_blak
post Nov 24 2009, 09:49 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 20 2009, 12:44 PM)
I got a quite of RM 536.00 p.a. for SA 50K (AIA)

I asked for a basic (no rider and not investment linked) critical illness coverage and this is what the agent quoted me.

Is this a fair market rate?

Xuzen
*
it is a burn out policy, means the premium u paid will totally pay to insurans company.
second advantages is its claim amount is less than normal one.
thirdly, the premium wont be waive if u are disable to pay it due to accident.


numbertwo
post Nov 24 2009, 10:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 23 2009, 08:10 PM)
you save if you buy young if you choose a policy with guaranteed renewal w/o loading or exclusions. that way you get less than 100% but still pay the old premium whereas as a new customer you have to fork out extra or cant get cover at all.
*
Tks PJUsa.. i have forgotten about this point.. thanks for the reminder..

But I won't bet that the policy will not have any change after 15-20 years...Suddenly you see 'portfolio withdrawal'... is something that we can't guarantee it won't happen forever..


Added on November 24, 2009, 10:42 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 24 2009, 08:51 AM)
kurnia only no loading and guaranteed renewal until 65. thereafter subject to their decision and then you need to take their senior policy anyway. so it allows them many times to impose loading or exclusions when you really need insurance that takes you no matter what. useless if you ask me. also lifetime limit is very low in relation to annual limit (3x only).
*
Which one of the Kurnia's plan has 'guaranteed renewal'... So far their premium is not guaranteed as per their website:

PERIOD OF COVER AND RENEWAL PREMIUM
This Policy shall become effective as of the date stated in the Schedule. The Policy Anniversary shall be one year after the effective date and annually thereafter. The renewal premiums payable is not guaranteed and the Company reserves the right to revise the premium rate applicable at the time of renewal. Generally, if the health status has been good, the premium in future Policy years will increase by your attained age according to the age band.

This post has been edited by numbertwo: Nov 24 2009, 10:42 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 24 2009, 11:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Nov 24 2009, 10:34 PM)
Tks PJUsa.. i have forgotten about this point..  thanks for the reminder..

But I won't bet that the policy will not have any change after 15-20 years...Suddenly you see 'portfolio withdrawal'... is something that we can't guarantee it won't happen forever..


Added on November 24, 2009, 10:42 pm

Which one of the Kurnia's plan has 'guaranteed renewal'... So far their premium is not guaranteed as per their website:

PERIOD OF COVER AND RENEWAL PREMIUM
This Policy shall become effective as of the date stated in the Schedule. The Policy Anniversary shall be one year after the effective date and annually thereafter. The renewal premiums payable is not guaranteed and the Company reserves the right to revise the premium rate applicable at the time of renewal. Generally, if the health status has been good, the premium in future Policy years will increase by your attained age according to the age band.
*
well, in malaysia there is no insurance company guarantees the premium after year 4.

including ILP and life.
PJusa
post Nov 25 2009, 09:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
guaranteed renewal is not the same as guaranteed premium. guaranteed renewal means you can choose to renew but the company cant kick you out, impose individual exclusions or loadings. kurnia premium offers just that.

with respect to CI : every CI cover is a "burn" policy. its just a matter of packaging. a pure CI can be much much cheaper if that is all you want to cover. 50k cover should only cost you around 120 (either AIA or Pacific) if you buy a pure CI from their general insurance branch at age 34. so u you got a bad quote. didnt see 536 in AIA premium shedule for 50k at all. must be some other plan and not the plain vanilla CI you asked for.
numbertwo
post Nov 25 2009, 09:43 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: PJ lamansara... :D


So this Kurnia is not 'guranteed renewal' and premium can be loaded individually since they do not mention anything about 'portfolio loading'... so what good does it have?
ozak
post Nov 25 2009, 10:22 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,018 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Why you guys buy this kind of insuarance such a young age? Why not use the money to invest on your health?
PJusa
post Nov 25 2009, 04:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ
numbertwo,

i feel the same way. the kurnia policy is not very attractive at all.

ozak,

to cover for unforseen sickness of course. also to lock in the good health status for future renewals. it's the best investment in your health (maintenance) you can make. cancer can occur without pretty much anything you can do about it. accident may cause you to require dialysis - so many things out of your hands... that is why insurance is good - you spread the risk among many and only pay the average damage ++ for sure instead of risking to face a major damage.
rakyat
post Nov 25 2009, 04:40 PM

I got stars
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: USJ


For CI & Medical insurance, it is not adviseable to purchase from General insurer b'coz they use an age-band premium rating. The premium is revised upwards every 3 to 5 years & for medical, once you have 'major' claim, they will load up your renewal premium.

If your age is not too advance, I recommend buying a life insurance (term or whole life) and attach CI & Medical riders. Hence you will be 'guaranteed renewals' and premium will not change (you will lock-in cheaper premium rating)

BTW, the only worthwhile life insurance to buy is term or whole life as they offer highest coverage per dollar premium. All other ILP, Saving, endownment mambo jumbo are just financing your agent's Merc ;-)

These days, ins. agents are lining up to offer annuality insurance with 3% to 4% returns when 5 years ago they said insurance co. no longer offer. I wonder whether the agents will sell me annuality insurance if the BLR is 8%? Sorry for the digression....



4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2441sec    0.39    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 01:30 PM