Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 medical / critical illness insurance enquiry

views
     
epalbee3
post Nov 1 2009, 10:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
I only need medical card and CI covering about (RM150 & RM100k).

Please help to give me a quote.


epalbee3
post Nov 16 2009, 11:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
I just bought a PA and medical card insurance.

It cost me RM520++ annually.

The coverage is RM125k (PA) and RM210k (medical).

The annual limit is RM75k, with room rate of RM150/day.

Please advise if my coverage is good enough.
epalbee3
post Nov 17 2009, 12:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
well.. it is a trade-off between premium and coverage.

I'm looking for a moderate coverage which costs moderately.

Kurnia insurance provides a renewable package up to 70 years, which is the normal case for medical insurance.
I guess if you want to protect up to 100 years, you got to go for CI insurance. (I don't know what is the price.)

For your information, to get up to RM150k/RM450k limit, you will have to pay twice of RM520 = RM 1000+. (where as the premium keep increasing every five years)

If looking from other perspective, we are already better than previous generations who do not have any coverage, but live happily..
Buying one just to keep us free of mind as you know nobody will lend you money.


Added on November 17, 2009, 12:25 pm
QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 17 2009, 12:13 PM)
well.. it is a trade-off between premium and coverage.

I'm looking for a moderate coverage which costs moderately.

Kurnia insurance provides a renewable package up to 70 years, which is the normal case for medical insurance.
I guess if you want to protect up to 100 years, you got to go for CI insurance. (I don't know what is the price.)

For your information, to get up to RM150k/RM450k limit, you will have to pay twice of RM520 = RM 1000+. (where as the premium keep increasing every five years)

If looking from other perspective, we are already better than previous generations who do not have any coverage, but live happily..
Buying one just to keep us free of mind as you know nobody will lend you money.
*
Anyway, for those afford, please buy as much as you can.

In future, may be we can still upgrade the current plan.


Added on November 17, 2009, 1:14 pmBy the way, anyone know if there is a CI plan with RM50k coverage until 100 years old? standalone product.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 17 2009, 01:14 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 17 2009, 03:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 17 2009, 01:20 PM)
epalbee3,

ok - one thing first: dont confuse CI and health insurance.

CI pays a lump sum amount in case of diagnostic and survival of one of the 36 "dread deseases". there is no additional benefit to this insurance and premium will go through the roof once you get older. you should use a CI (if you really want to) only while you are young and the risk is low. that way CI can serve as a means of providing a financial cushion should you be unable to work further or in case you die provide relief to your family.

H&S (hospitalisation and surgical insurance) on the other hand pays your bills up the limit. the scope is pretty much that - hospital and surgery + some after care. this is what you need to focus on. if your H&S stops at 70 and you life longer who is paying the bills. i personally would want 80 or 100 for my H&S. CI can stop at 55 imho and cover can even decrease with age to provide adequate cover throughout time with low cost.

problem is: medical insurance will be damn expensive at 70++ so few insurance companies offer them. for example AXA, GE, AIA have plans that cover until 80 or 100. what you need to look at is the average costs until the end of the cover from your current age onwards. if you can afford the resulting average premium today, chances are you will be able to keep the policy in force despite inflation driving the premiums even higher in the future.

and yes: buy as much medical cover as you can afford smile.gif.

my personal choice is H&S and PA over H&S and CI because PA covers more cases at a fixed price and high H&S covers the dread deseases too. CI is fine between 20 and 50 though but not entirely essential if you ask me.

that beeing said, i'd look into ways of increasing your annual H&S cover if you have the budget to spare. for example a so called top-up insurance with a high deductable is a very cost efficient solution to cover spikes. premium will be only a couple of 100 RM even for a 150k p.a. / 750 k lifetime extra cover.
*
mind to share the price of "AXA, GE, AIA" for 80 and 100?
Let's say if monthly need RM500++ then they will be no point, as during the old age, you might not be able to pay for this.

AAM does offer CI (50k) at a reasonable annual premium of RM80-200 for < age of 45 years old. After that it is like a few thousands.
It is no harm to buy it while young.

But you are right, if we have money, why dun top up the medical insurance.

I think as long as you have some medical coverage, you can cover some emergency situation where government hospital cannot give immediate treatment. After that, may be you have to rely on government hospital.

After all, we have our own current aims to achieve everyday, it will not make sense to pay too much for this.


Added on November 17, 2009, 4:06 pmAIA only up to 70 years old.

I am quite surprised with AXA which offers unlimited coverage. Anyone experience with them before?

GE MEDICARE 100 is the only one that gives protection until 100 years.

Mind to share more about this?


Added on November 17, 2009, 4:18 pmone more comment: AXA limits the amount per disability which may not be good for long year problem..

Anyone shares about GE Medicare 100?

For kurnia, you can apply for medicare senior once you reach 50 years old.


Added on November 17, 2009, 10:09 pmOne more comments:

Even with > 70 years medical insurance, I will not buy.

from 70 - 100 years, you got to pay about 200k premium.

If you have that money, you don't need medical insurance.

If not, you better use that money to feed yourself.

Remember, after retirement, every cent is hard to recover.

Medical insurance is just for those with money, not those without money.

Before you buy medical insurance after 70 years, make sure you have well-plan your retirement.

Without proper retirement plan, there is no point talking about senior medical insurance.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 17 2009, 10:09 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 19 2009, 11:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Nov 19 2009, 03:48 PM)
As per AXA contract, this is the definition of 'per disability'

11. Disability Shall mean a Sickness, Disease, Illness or the
entire Injuries arising of a single or continuous series of causes. ANY ONE DISABILITY shall
mean all of the periods of disability arising from the same cause including any and all
complications there from except that if the Insured Person completely recovers and
remain free from further treatment (including drugs, medicines, special diet or injection or
advice for the condition) of the disability for at least ninety (90) days following the latest date
of discharge and subsequent disability from the same cause shall be considered as though it
were a new disability.


If you have an existing medical plan, you can opt for "Deductible' Option in AXA SC Optimum plan.
Bad thing about AXA, the way I rate them, is their limited lifetime limits on kidney/cancer treatments.  That's why their premium is affordable yet still gives you 'unlimited' lifetime limit.

I'vent been able to update my site, but maybe some info is helpful from within : http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Medi...aysia/message/2

Rgrds
*
so this is the weakness of AXA policy, which is not good for long-term treatments.

again. no point buying medical insurance after 70 as premium is very high.


Added on November 19, 2009, 11:35 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 19 2009, 08:21 PM)
numbertwo,

correct about the definition - i have the wordings too. but the question is: since there are no limits besides the annual limit besides for cancer / dialysis how does this clause affect the insured for other disabilities besides cancer and dialysis? the way i read it it doesnt affect you since there is no specified monetary limit present.
*
PJusa, there is a limit of 150 days hospitalization per disability.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 19 2009, 11:35 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 09:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 20 2009, 01:40 PM)
thanks for the pointer. i never saw it in conjunction with the 150days. that is a serious loophole. i am running AXA in combination with a top-up so i am pretty save in that respect and since both policies have serious weeknesses that dont really overlap (i.e. AXA 150 days, tokio marine 10k deductable) the combination of the two still seems to be a very attractively priced round coverage.

sadly so far i have not come across a better solution to overcome lifetime limit issues and fee issues i.e. premiums that are out of reach of the insured. anyone has a better solution besides going for an international insurance?


Added on November 20, 2009, 2:04 pmquick update: william russel has an office in malaysia.

http://www.william-russell.com/individuals...ntial/benefits/

this plan might be a good idea too as the limits that apply to local policies dont apply here.

if you choose this policy as a backup with a 2,500 US$ deductable you can insure a 33 yr old for around 50 US$ per month with a 200,000 US$ annual limit. that would be pretty good. will check what allianz offers these days.
*
For William Russell, it is only for expatriates:

You are unable to get a quote if your Country of Residence is the same as your nationality, we can only insure expatriates

epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 10:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(ltandrew @ Nov 21 2009, 09:53 AM)
Hi All,

Is trher any plans that
a-cover specialist doctor visits
b-cover hospitalisations
c-other rest
*
Most medical cards cover this.

Try to buy from kurnia, AXA and etc.

I would say kurnia is ok.
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 10:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(ozak @ Nov 21 2009, 10:49 AM)
Maybe you can check with AIA. They have better deal. And cover till 100yrs.
*
I dun think medial insurance after 70 years is affordable if you do not have income.

Our previous conclusion is no point buying medical insurance after 70.


epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 04:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 21 2009, 01:48 PM)
yeah too bad about william russel. but it seems allianzworldwidecare is available. at least i managed to a get an offer just fine. they have a pretty high end cover even on the lower plans and malaysia apparently enjoys some discount on the premium.

basic plan only around RM 400 per month. and this "Classic Individual" covers 1.25 million euros per year medical costs p.a. without any lifetime limit - take a look:

http://www.allianzworldwidecare.com/compar...duals?choice=en

annual premium for age 33 is €1,025.00 = RM 5000 = 416 p.m.

the optional outpatient is way too costly but the core plan is good. but hold your breath: premium at age 70 is €4,617 p.a.= 23k. if you compare this with local insurances that aint that bad considering the cover you get.

too bad they dont publish rates beyond 70, the support told me they cover until you die if you so wish but could not advise on premium due.

maybe one should ask them to offer a group plan for malaysia (lowyat medical plan wink.gif ) to get extra discount....
*
Ok, things come with a price.

RM416/month at young age is not something that within our limits. don't forget it is only for medical. how about PA?

Just buy kurnia, you got RM42 per month to enjoy reasonable coverage for PA and medical.

After that, you can put the rest of your money at ASW or AS1M, you should double your money within 20 years.
epalbee3
post Nov 21 2009, 10:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
my friend was offered a GE investment linked insurance with monthly 150 for 20 years.

he is now 30 years old. but medical insurance until 70 years old.
may I know how does he pay for medical insurance until 70?

Also the sum assured is RM35000 and CI is 20000 (until 100 years old). Does it mean 20000 is deducted from sum assured?does he able to get back money when he was 70 years old?


Added on November 21, 2009, 10:43 pm
QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Nov 21 2009, 10:38 PM)
my friend was offered a GE investment linked insurance with monthly 150 for 20 years.

he is now 30 years old. but medical insurance until 70 years old.
may I know how does he pay for medical insurance until 70?

Also the sum assured is RM35000 and CI is 20000 (until 100 years old). Does it mean 20000 is deducted from sum assured?does he able to get back money when he was 70 years old?
*
Some of my friends said that if you are going to include medical insurance in the life policy, you usually will end up get nothing, paying all for medical premium. Is that true?

Since investment link is not guaranteed, usually policy will assume the best case, which you might face difficulty later? kindly advise.

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 21 2009, 10:43 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 22 2009, 10:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(myremi @ Nov 22 2009, 04:24 AM)
The thing about medical insurance is that it's good to have when you actually have health problems. So thinking that you end up paying for nothing, it's very small thing when you finally do have a health problem.

The earlier that you start medical insurance, the cheaper it will be in the long run. I see my parents now taking out insurance in the later part of their lives, they have to pay more than what they would have paid if they had started earlier. And the premium doesn't have to be in the high ranges. If you tell the insurance agent that your budget is low, they shoudl be able to give you a lower premium until you are able financially to pay more.

You may want to look for a policy that will cover both heart diseases and back problems. These may usually not be part of critical illnesses but it's popping up more regularly. Take it from someone who is experiencing both. It's expensive to treat.

The other thing is the cost of doing the medical tests. There's only a certain limit that the insurance will cover so gotta check if that covers it for you too.
*
myremi, good say good say..

Insurance was invented with a good will for a group of people to share common risks.
It is good as long as you have achieve your objective of protection.


epalbee3
post Nov 22 2009, 10:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(myremi @ Nov 22 2009, 07:53 PM)
Well, the golden years are below 30 years of age. After 30, that's when health problems start popping up and it's annoying when insurance or your company's health policy doesn't quite cover everything. Some ppl try SOCSO but even that is not a lot.

Hmm...and I think with the different types of insurance around, it's not easy to do the comparison. I remember spending 2 months just sitting down and trying to make head and tail on 10 different packages. 8 years ago, it was easy to decide what I wanted :

-best female coverage, especially during pregnancy and a newborn baby
-covered medical tests
-the various additional options
-the reputation of the company and whether I knew the agent

The insurance coverage we have here isn't as good as in the US or Europe but even then, even doing an operation is a big deal and that option may not necessarily be the best either.

I would say that it's hard to decide on the type of insurance to take without good friends to ask for advice.

I did get a prep talk from a friend recently that one of the Takaful funds is offering GPA insurance as part of the unit rates purchase and if one wanted to include the critical illnesses, they can pay for it but still at cheaper rates than what insurance companies are offering.
*
well, as long as the purpose of protection is available, it should be ok.

I believe different people have different preferences. I would just take PA and Medical Insurance, the rest of the money I prefer to invest myself into AS1M and etc. In this case, you can get a ala-carte type of insurance you need. I do think that whoever afford should buy PA and medical insurance. The rest should be up to you.

Insurance is insurance, if you want to save money, put it at bank or ASN, and it is free.

And one more thing, you should consider have spent all the money you pay for insurance, as for investment link usually what you save will eventually go to pay your premium for medical insurance. so pay only what you afford as there is no return on investment whatever.



epalbee3
post Nov 23 2009, 08:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Nov 23 2009, 07:24 PM)
ILP usually deducts the units from your investment portion of your policy in order to pay for the riders(ie. medical, CI, payor waiver, etc.) that are attached to the ILP.  So, if the funds that you have chosen fails to 'shine', your premium will surely goes to paying the rest of the riders attached.   And remember to ask the agent, does he know anything about 'Top-Up' cases in ILP.  Top-up cases happen whenever the units in your investment funds are insufficient to pay for the cost of insurance+riders... , you will have to top-up a certain amount of money in your renewal.  Many ILP policyholders are not aware of this 'feature' in ILP.. So pls take note.

So, yes, ILP's return is not guaranteed, never listen to any guarantee mentioned by the agent as ILP will never have any kind of 'guaranteed' return.   What you gonna get after 20 years is all depending on the performance of the funds chosen in your ILP...  Good luck.


Added on November 23, 2009, 7:30 pm

Hi myremi,

care to enlighten me how one would safe a few $$ if one took medical insurance in their early years...  Med insurance are age-banded.. If you bought one at age 50  you will be charged at the banded rate at age 50.  If you have bought one earlier say 40, you will still have to pay the same rate when you renew the policy at age 50.  The scenario is the same as whether you are 'healthy' at the age of 50 .  If there is a loading, it will happen irregardless whether you buy the policy at age 50 or age 40, still you will have to pay for some premium loading if you are not 100% fit & healthy..  Correct me if i'm wrong.
*
Yes, when people buy ILP, they usually thought that they will be able to recover a decent amount of money at the end of the policy.

In fact, most of the money will be spent and they will get nothing except protections.

It is in constrast with normal life insurance; however, normal life insurance also spend most of the money to pay for those premium, end up they get little at the end.

That's y people said, insurance is insurance, saving is saving. you will never get ROI for insurance; there is a premium you must pay.

I think when people say "when you buy younger you pay less" is something misleading, you buy younger you should pay more, but you get protection for longer periods.

The consumer must be smart enough, because all people will only show you the "very best case" when promoting a product to you. I say it is ok for those who are rich, but for those who merely can pay up the premium, they will end up getting something under their expectation.


Added on November 23, 2009, 8:17 pm
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 23 2009, 08:10 PM)
you save if you buy young if you choose a policy with guaranteed renewal w/o loading or exclusions. that way you get less than 100% but still pay the old premium whereas as a new customer you have to fork out extra or cant get cover at all.
*
I thought for all product, the premium is not guaranteed after 4 years?

This post has been edited by epalbee3: Nov 23 2009, 08:17 PM
epalbee3
post Nov 23 2009, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
kurnia no loading.
epalbee3
post Nov 24 2009, 06:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(PJusa @ Nov 24 2009, 08:51 AM)
kurnia only no loading and guaranteed renewal until 65. thereafter subject to their decision and then you need to take their senior policy anyway. so it allows them many times to impose loading or exclusions when you really need insurance that takes you no matter what. useless if you ask me. also lifetime limit is very low in relation to annual limit (3x only).
*
yes, i agree with you. if you really so keen to renew until 80, you can switch to senior medical starting 50 years old. the premium is not different.

by the way, there is an idiom spoken by our seniors: "don't afraid you won't be able to buy something, as long as you have money".

I'm not looking for a perfect coverage either. RM 50 per month is just a nice figure.


epalbee3
post Nov 24 2009, 11:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(numbertwo @ Nov 24 2009, 10:34 PM)
Tks PJUsa.. i have forgotten about this point..  thanks for the reminder..

But I won't bet that the policy will not have any change after 15-20 years...Suddenly you see 'portfolio withdrawal'... is something that we can't guarantee it won't happen forever..


Added on November 24, 2009, 10:42 pm

Which one of the Kurnia's plan has 'guaranteed renewal'... So far their premium is not guaranteed as per their website:

PERIOD OF COVER AND RENEWAL PREMIUM
This Policy shall become effective as of the date stated in the Schedule. The Policy Anniversary shall be one year after the effective date and annually thereafter. The renewal premiums payable is not guaranteed and the Company reserves the right to revise the premium rate applicable at the time of renewal. Generally, if the health status has been good, the premium in future Policy years will increase by your attained age according to the age band.
*
well, in malaysia there is no insurance company guarantees the premium after year 4.

including ILP and life.
epalbee3
post Nov 25 2009, 11:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
I have a concern. I bought the medical insurance without card.
Thus I have to do reimbursement.

What are the advices which one is better? medical card or reimbursement?
I read that with medical card you have not much choice of hospital, however you will save a lot of hassle.

And who can let me know how difficult is the procedure to claim for kurnia?
epalbee3
post Nov 29 2009, 01:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
medical protection comes with cost.

I prefer separately as ala-carte types can help you to customize your preference and take out anything that you don't want.

e.g. you may be able to change medical coverage without changing the life insurance, and you have the choice to add-in extra coverage when you have more free money.


epalbee3
post Dec 10 2009, 04:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(cenkudu @ Dec 10 2009, 03:58 PM)
yup, that might be a good alternative. but I have CI not with intention to cover that but more towards to cover the lost of income. My company medical card do not cover outpatient treatment and AXA plan is generally good except for dialysis and cancer.
*
That was what I meantioned about AXA..


epalbee3
post Jan 1 2010, 10:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Jan 1 2010, 07:20 AM)

And it so happens that many of the best medical cards are owned by the lifers.
Any list of H&S insurance provider given your experience?


Added on January 1, 2010, 10:31 am
QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Jan 1 2010, 07:20 AM)
but some other would want you to submit a medical report first before being admitted
Which insurance needs people to submit medical report first?

I guess this is only applied to those covered by company who will request this and make decision on their discretion.

But as GI insurance, we are customers.

It is not begging for approval, but executing the rights that have been paid for.


Added on January 1, 2010, 10:45 am
QUOTE(jc@lyn @ Dec 23 2009, 11:58 AM)
Dear forumers,

I found out that my father does not have a medical insurance plan.
He is currently 59years, will be 60 in end of Jan 2010.
As far as i know, majority insurance companies will not accept my father application once he hits 60 on his coming birthday.

Therefore, I am very worried about the options we have due to the time constraint imposed.

His health conditions described as follows >>
1. he has high blood pressure. He goes for regular check up and take medicines to control on a regular basis.
2. he does not have any illness or high blood pressure related illness as of last check up (approx. 2 month ago).
I have tried to approach agents, however, the agents i have met, regrettably i had unsatisfactory service.
They do not seems to know what i want, and only trying to persuade me on getting a Investment-Linked Life Policy + Medical as rider for him, even at his age, factoring in the rising medical premiums as he age.
More so, some of them don't even know their product well :s
(i am sorry, i am not trying to offend anyone, this is just my experience i encountered n i would like to share)
*** My aim here is to get a H&S medical insurance ONLY for him. ***
(A) Could anyone suggest a reasonable/fair value/suitable H&S for my father, factoring in his age and health condition?

Due to the time constraint, i don't have sufficient time to make details investigation of the available H&S in the market.
I sincerely hope i could access your knowledge and wisdom here.
Thank you in advance for your information.

## I have a budget of monthly RM300-400 (including Loading if applicable) for age band between 60 to 65 at the moment, and I understand that the premiums will continue to rise according to the age band thereafter.

## my requirement are as follows >>
    i. Must be Guaranteed Renewal
    ii. Outpatient Kidney Dialysis, Cancer Treatment must be available, with reasonable level of coverage.

(B) Because of my past experience with agents, i am opting for walk-in where possible, may i know does anyone know which insurance companies accept walk-in for H&S, and offer discounted premiums if walk-in (discounted premium is optional, my main concern is the possibility of walk-in)

© If you have an insurance agent that you personally have used, and/or you sincerely think he/she is reliable and genuinely could offer assistance to me, i would be very grateful if you could PM me his/her contact.
I hope you guys could help me out in good faith, and i would like to thank you in advance for any assistance you could offer.

A quick question:
What's the difference between General Insurance's H&S and Life Insurance's H&S ?

I understand Life Insurance's H&S offer Guarantee Renewal, while General Insurance's H&S offer Conditional Renewal, but General Insurance's H&S will offer guarantee renewal after a specific period of no-claim, for example 1 year, or 2 year.

Last time i enquire about Tokio Marine's Medic Plus, the customer representative told me that the no-claim period COVERS also accidental event, that means, if involved in accident, make claims, then, the future H&S renewal will be subject to insurer discretion.

I am confused. Can anyone elabore further the pros & cons between getting a General Insurance's H&S and Life insurance's H&S.
Again, thank you deeply for any assistance offer.
*
Ok. you can apply for Senior Medical Card. (Up to 80 years old)

Worth or not is another problem as the premium is also quite high. a few thousands per year.

You can search kurnia, AIA and prudential. Just walk in will do and you get discount of about 15%. Quite a lot seeing your premium.

I could not comment on which company is better, may be you can ask PJusa..





This post has been edited by epalbee3: Jan 1 2010, 10:45 AM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0363sec    0.92    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 08:36 AM