Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 medical / critical illness insurance enquiry

views
     
juicyjessy
post Jun 17 2009, 11:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


Hi, does anyone here is HLA medical holder? Any comments (good/bad)? I'm considering to buy HLA or Allianz but .......Pls give some of your experience....
juicyjessy
post Jun 17 2009, 05:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


[quote=c.o.o.l,Jun 17 2009, 01:38 PM]
Would you like to consider for Prudential?

- ICU, outpatient cancer, outpatient kidney dialysis is as charge
- No claim bonus. Means if a year you did not make any claim, there will be bonus credit to your account.
- Can choose to waive annual limit
- Can choose to cover up to age 100.

If you are interested, give me a pm.


Added on June 17, 2009, 1:41 pm

but that is co-insurance rite?
how much for age 25-30?
juicyjessy
post Jun 18 2009, 09:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 17 2009, 05:57 PM)
HI everyone:

This is my summary
GE - Smart Medic The highest lifetime limit with the most number of days (180 days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause and the co-payment if exceed R&B charges up to no cap!
Pru - PMM5 annual limit and lifetime limit not as high as GE's smart medic (120days on normal room and board / yr) - drawback - co-insurance clause
Pru - PruHealth has the option to NCB and option up to age 80 or 100 and option to go for no annual limit cap- drawback - co-insurance clause higher than PMM5 (if i'm not mistaken), also the COI (cost of insurance is way higher than PMM5)
Allianz - Medicover annual limit and lifetime limit same as PMM5 (150 days on normal room and board/ disability), no-co-insurance - drawback - annual limit not so high as compared to GE's Smart Medic and PruHealth
HLA - No co-insurance, drawback - lifetime limit quite low at 3X
ING - same as HLA

These are the best cards running in the market at the moment - c which suits u most as these cards has outpatient cancer and kidney dialysis treatment are as-charged.

These cards are best bought with ILP and the cheapest package ILP with medical card rider, I would say it's Allianz. (Agents from other comp pls correct me if i'm wrong). Allianz can do RM150/mth for a RM300 room and board for ppl below 30 yrs.

Hope this can help u in choosing.

Rgds
*
Hi, thanks for the above infor. It's usefull to all here.
I'm act considering of either HLA or Allianz only. The thing that i found out why HLA more expensive than others is some clause they have and others no. Some more their premium higher is maybe co-in alr added in since co-ins is bank negara rules. Finally, i'm still considering of HLA though it's expensive but i think its worth. However, the problem is i heard lots bad comments bout the claim procedure. Frens and agent's client also comments that HLA claim is very difficult and etc. So.....it's make me stuck.

This post has been edited by juicyjessy: Jun 18 2009, 09:21 AM
juicyjessy
post Jun 19 2009, 09:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


Act HLA and Allianz premium is not much diff. But HLA did have additional benefit as below:

i) Daily cash as a result of hospitality due to Road Accident at Highway (150) days.
ii) In Hospitality Physiotherapy Treatment
iii) Organt transplant which Allianz didnt mentioned on their schedule.
iv) Day surgery benefit
v) Emergency Accidental Outpatient Treatment (no limit) which Allianz did.
vi) Emergency Accidental Dental Treatment
vii) O/patient Physiotherapy treatment
viii) Emergency Evacuation Repatriation
x) Daily cash allowance. (Allianz did have but additional charges)

As for claim problem, just fren and agent told me that diff. So, i have no idea whether it's or not. So, just hope can get some comments here from the policy holder.


Added on June 19, 2009, 9:56 am
QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 18 2009, 01:48 PM)
Its kind of weird u are mentioning the few drawbacks from HLA and you are still insist on HLA. SUPRISED! blink.gif Then just go ahead with Allianz la. I dun encounter any claims problem during these few years attached to Allianz, so if the premium is cheaper and no co-ins, i dun c y u cant just get Allianz. And btw, can you share what HLA clause is superior than other companies? We want to know. Thanks.
*
Hi, thanks for the comment on Allianz.



This post has been edited by juicyjessy: Jun 19 2009, 10:09 AM
juicyjessy
post Jun 22 2009, 03:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


finally has decided to take up HLA.
juicyjessy
post Jun 26 2009, 09:37 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Feb 23 2009, 06:13 PM)
Dear Xuzen,

I have a quote for you. Based on age 30 male non-smoker.

Investment Linked Policy - The cheapest given your budget.
Death Benefit - RM 100K
Total Permanent Disability - RM 100K
36 Critical Illness - RM 200K
important note: If diagnose with 36 Critical Illness, this account will pay RM 200K. Then later if Death occurs, the account will pay another RM 100K. So its RM 300K in total.

The premium, RM 150/mth - RM 1800/yr. This is no scam.

Call or contact me at 016 335 0044.
*
Hi, I'm interested on this plan too. Would like to check which company of this? Thanks.

By the way, anyone of here can advise whether Medical Insurance should put in ILP or traditional plan? Any comemnts?
Thank you.
juicyjessy
post Jun 26 2009, 02:04 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(c.o.o.l @ Jun 26 2009, 10:41 AM)
I thought you have already taken up HLA policy?
*
yea...i had decided HLA (traditional). but then will take up another ILP also. Still thinking where to put medical insurance (ILP or traditional).

Above is more suitable to my bf so wan to check also.
juicyjessy
post Jun 29 2009, 09:46 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: BUKIT JALIL, KUALA LUMPUR


QUOTE(chew_ronnie @ Jun 27 2009, 07:53 PM)
Hi,

This is from Allianz.

There is always pros and cons for traditional policies and ILPs. So there is no 1 best plan. It all comes back to what benefits u want and whether the budget you have can get what u want or not. Put it simple - for younger ppl age less than 45, buying ILP is cheaper than buying traditional life policy given that u want the same coverage. But the drawback in ILP is u may face to add extra premium when the fund is not enough to cover the cost of insurance. On the other hand, traditional policies (whole life NOT term) gives you some returns at the end of the day and its considered quite safe. So you choose which suits u better.
*
Hi, thanks for your comments. Above is noted as well.
Finally, we bought ILP and traditional both. Hope we choose and plan the rite thing.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0442sec    0.80    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 02:46 PM