Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AV Receivers/ Speakers/ Subwoofers, Discussion & Opinion

views
     
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 7 2016, 07:11 PM, updated 7y ago

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
I'm thinking about getting an AV receiver & satellite speakers with subwoofer but before I blindly buy into any of these stuff, I need to know which is the most reliable brand for an av receiver and also for satellite speakers with subwoofer. By the way I have a tight budget! blush.gif

1. Which brand is the most reliable in terms of quality & worth the money? hmm.gif
2. My budget is around RM900 - RM1300 (AV receiver) & RM800 - RM1200 (satellite speakers with subwoofer) icon_rolleyes.gif
3. I'm going to put it into my master room. tongue.gif

Your thoughts please? icon_question.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: May 2 2019, 01:24 AM
Topet
post Feb 7 2016, 08:53 PM

schadenfreude
*****
Senior Member
994 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Sabah


1. Pioneer vsx 524
2. Infinity satellite

Can get in senq if still available
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 7 2016, 08:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(Topet @ Feb 7 2016, 08:53 PM)
1. Pioneer vsx 524
2. Infinity satellite

Can get in senq if still available
*
Price for each item bro? unsure.gif

I'll definitely will check it out! TQ! notworthy.gif
ktek
post Feb 7 2016, 09:00 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 7 2016, 08:55 PM)
Price for each item bro?  unsure.gif

I'll definitely will check it out! TQ!  notworthy.gif
*
not sure exact as nobody work in senq.
but is closely match ur budget
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 7 2016, 09:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(ktek @ Feb 7 2016, 09:00 PM)
not sure exact as nobody work in senq.
but is closely match ur budget
*
Tq.

Anyone else? blush.gif
ktek
post Feb 7 2016, 09:41 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 7 2016, 09:37 PM)
Tq.

Anyone else?  blush.gif
*
actually tight budget should go avr + 2 quality bookshelf. u have more resistance to upgrade hehehe.

budget surround set easy lose steam causing u to spend again & again
SSJBen
post Feb 8 2016, 12:22 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


A pair of cheap sats and sub at RM1200 max isn't going to get you anything much better than a decent soundbar to be quite honest. Suggest to get AVR + midrange bookshelves is a much better option. The well priced Sony SS-CS5 is an amazing pair at RM700. Yes I said Sony.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 9 2016, 12:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 8 2016, 12:22 PM)
A pair of cheap sats and sub at RM1200 max isn't going to get you anything much better than a decent soundbar to be quite honest. Suggest to get AVR + midrange bookshelves is a much better option. The well priced Sony SS-CS5 is an amazing pair at RM700. Yes I said Sony.
*
Your proposal seems interesting. I found a guy who seems to have a little similar problem as mine.

Here's the thread.

Low-end Towers & Bookshelves vs. Mid/Higher-end Satellites


I am building my first home theatre and have a maximum budget of $1000 CAD.

I realize I don't have a lot of options but research has led me to two possible outcomes.

I am debating between an entry level line of full speakers like the Sony Core Series

SSCS3 Tower - $185x2
SSCS8 - $120
SSCS5 Bookshelf (pair) - $225
SACS9 Sub - $235
TOTAL: $950 + Tax


OR

...a set of satellites with sub-woofer from a respected loudspeaker manufacturer like the Paradigm Cinema 100 CT

5 Satellites + 300W Subwoofer = $700 + Tax

Considerations:
Room is 17ft deep x 24ft wide (listening area is about 17x17ft, but it opens on one side to about 24ft deep). --will those little paradigms be able to even come close to filling that space?
Receiver is a Denon S710 (only 75W per channel) - will this be a problem driving the 6ohm Sonys?
Use will be 80:20 movies:music.

Any advise, further considerations, or additional recommendations are greatly appreciated.


Interesting eh? blink.gif
sonerin
post Feb 9 2016, 01:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
To be fair each brand has their own strength and weakness. Sometimes is not just the matter of size. Sound without characteric / tune is basically is just noise
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 9 2016, 03:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 9 2016, 01:41 PM)
To be fair each brand has their own strength and weakness. Sometimes is not just the matter of size. Sound without characteric  / tune is basically is just noise
*
Any recommendation? blink.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 9 2016, 04:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image

Sony SS-CS5 smile.gif
sonerin
post Feb 9 2016, 04:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 9 2016, 04:00 PM)
user posted image

Sony SS-CS5   smile.gif
*
I have not heard the sound for this speaker. Cannot comment on it. For small bookshelf I personally like q acoustics
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 9 2016, 04:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image

Denon HOMETHEATER SYSTEM satelite 5.1 channel speaker

RM980.10


or


user posted image

PIONEER 5.1ch Speaker System S11+S21W

RM719.10


*Two choices for satelite speakers + subwoofer

hmm.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: Feb 9 2016, 04:36 PM
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 9 2016, 04:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 9 2016, 04:19 PM)
I have not heard the sound for this speaker. Cannot comment on it. For small bookshelf I personally like q acoustics
*
hmm.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 9 2016, 04:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
I am more into movies than music...... brows.gif
sonerin
post Feb 9 2016, 04:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 9 2016, 04:48 PM)
I am more into movies than music...... brows.gif
*
Q acoustics are fine speakers for movies. If you read my comment just few posts on top
bad2928
post Feb 10 2016, 12:39 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


check out SVS prime satellite speaker
pokchik
post Feb 11 2016, 12:07 PM

I'm getting too old for this sh*t
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


currently having this

user posted image

with Pioneer VSX-821K

..and the receiver decides to hang up on me (that damned bugger couldn't go to standby mode!)

wonder if i can sell the speakers & subs off.. unsure.gif


SSJBen
post Feb 11 2016, 09:51 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(pokchik @ Feb 11 2016, 12:07 PM)
currently having this

user posted image

with Pioneer VSX-821K

..and the receiver decides to hang up on me (that damned bugger couldn't go to standby mode!)

wonder if i can sell the speakers & subs off..  unsure.gif
*
Pioneer entry level stuff is subpar, always has been. They're known for their LX series of receivers, their VSX has always been failed products.

Keep the speakers, get a different receiver.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 12:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(pokchik @ Feb 11 2016, 12:07 PM)
currently having this

user posted image

with Pioneer VSX-821K

..and the receiver decides to hang up on me (that damned bugger couldn't go to standby mode!)

wonder if i can sell the speakers & subs off..  unsure.gif
*
How much you purchased all of it? hmm.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 01:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 11 2016, 09:51 PM)
Pioneer entry level stuff is subpar, always has been. They're known for their LX series of receivers, their VSX has always been failed products.

Keep the speakers, get a different receiver.
*
I never own a Pioneer avr before. I do have a Denon 1311 avr tho. smile.gif

I'm thinking either Denon or Yamaha. hmm.gif

user posted image

RM1159

or

user posted image
Denon AV Receiver AVR 1513

RM1288

Comments? wub.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: Feb 12 2016, 01:13 AM
SSJBen
post Feb 12 2016, 02:08 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Instead of the older v375, go for the v379 instead. Fits right into your budget.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 03:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 12 2016, 02:08 AM)
Instead of the older v375, go for the v379 instead. Fits right into your budget.
*
Interesting and BIG too! blush.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 03:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Nowadays must have all these..... blink.gif

user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: Feb 12 2016, 04:02 AM
sonerin
post Feb 12 2016, 07:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
I support Yamaha as is local made
pokchik
post Feb 12 2016, 09:19 AM

I'm getting too old for this sh*t
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 12 2016, 12:18 AM)
How much you purchased all of it?  hmm.gif
*
it's a 4yrs' old setup.. RM3k last time.

Ben suggesting V379..? interesting.. will take a look too.. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by pokchik: Feb 12 2016, 09:48 AM
radovantz
post Feb 12 2016, 09:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


It depends on your preference, either the features or the sound, which one is more important to you.

If the sound is more important, I guess:
(1) In tonal quality, Yamaha will sound more relaxing in the ears as compare to Denon bright character (especially the AVR-XX12 & XX13 product years).
However,
(2) In sound character, the Yamaha will sound like ordinary brands enough to please most people, while Denon will have extra advantage in warm and crisp sound to please audiophile people.

Yamaha RX-V375 or Denon AVR-1513, I would go for Yamaha

This post has been edited by radovantz: Feb 12 2016, 10:08 AM
SSJBen
post Feb 12 2016, 02:39 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 12 2016, 03:22 AM)
Interesting and BIG too!  blush.gif
*
The 379 is a good entry level receiver, rest assured. The price is right, decent features, nice neutral-ish sound but still providing very decent punchy dynamics. There's really not much wrong with it.


QUOTE(pokchik @ Feb 12 2016, 09:19 AM)
it's a 4yrs' old setup.. RM3k last time.

Ben suggesting V379..? interesting.. will take a look too..  biggrin.gif
*
Yeah, if your budget is really only 1.3k+ or so, the 379 is a great fit.


QUOTE(radovantz @ Feb 12 2016, 09:57 AM)
It depends on your preference, either the features or the sound, which one is more important to you.

If the sound is more important, I guess:
(1) In tonal quality, Yamaha will sound more relaxing in the ears as compare to Denon bright character (especially the AVR-XX12 & XX13 product years).
However,
(2) In sound character, the Yamaha will sound like ordinary brands enough to please most people, while Denon will have extra advantage in warm and crisp sound to please audiophile people.

Yamaha RX-V375 or Denon AVR-1513, I would go for Yamaha
*
Pretty much agreed.
Though Yamaha receivers are generally somewhat laid back, neutral-ish sounding, I don't think they lack dynamics for most people. They are a good middle ground and has been proven to be hard to go wrong with.

Coupled with the fact that Yamaha products are generally easy (in comparison to say Denon or Marantz) to get support with here, that's a bonus if anything goes wrong.
pokchik
post Feb 12 2016, 02:51 PM

I'm getting too old for this sh*t
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


actually, as a non-audiophile, i failed to sense the problem(s) which come with Pioneer lower-end setup.
i recently browsed-thru Pioneer MY FB page, and the comments there were like.. doh.gif

QUOTE
he customer service is sucks!!! I bought an hi-fi set model vsx-922-k way back in 2013. The power board broke down, sent to repair authorized dealer since November 2015. Till now 2016, haven't got the spare parts yet. Called the customer centre, no one can give an favorable feedback.
For those who are considering to buy this brand, think twice!!!! Not professional at all!!


QUOTE
i buy pioneer SE-CL751 9 months send 2 times warranty
bad quality of pioneer


probably will get a simple soundbar or that Sony BDV-9200 with wireless speakers.


This post has been edited by pokchik: Feb 12 2016, 02:54 PM
sonerin
post Feb 12 2016, 03:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(pokchik @ Feb 12 2016, 02:51 PM)
actually, as a non-audiophile, i failed to sense the problem(s) which come with Pioneer lower-end setup.
i recently browsed-thru Pioneer MY FB page, and the comments there were like..  doh.gif
probably will get a simple soundbar or that Sony BDV-9200 with wireless speakers.
*
If sound is not the important thing is ok to go with sound bar
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 08:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(pokchik @ Feb 12 2016, 09:19 AM)
it's a 4yrs' old setup.. RM3k last time.

Ben suggesting V379..? interesting.. will take a look too..  biggrin.gif
*
user posted image

AV receiver that supports Bluetooth® for wireless music playback, 4K Ultra HD video with HDCP 2.2 compatibility and a discrete 5.1-channel amplifier design. YPAO automatically calibrates your listening environment for optimal sound performance.

Bluetooth® for wireless music streaming with Compressed Music Enhancer
•4K Ultra HD pass-through with HDCP 2.2 support
•YPAO sound optimization for automatic speaker setup
•Virtual CINEMA FRONT provides virtual surround sound with five speakers in front
•Extra Bass setting provides more bass output from smaller speakers
•5.1-channel powerful surround sound
•Newly designed remote control with large buttons for enhanced ease of use

Rating very good for RX V379 but RX V479 model even better. The problem is out of budget! sad.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 08:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(radovantz @ Feb 12 2016, 09:57 AM)
It depends on your preference, either the features or the sound, which one is more important to you.

If the sound is more important, I guess:
(1) In tonal quality, Yamaha will sound more relaxing in the ears as compare to Denon bright character (especially the AVR-XX12 & XX13 product years).
However,
(2) In sound character, the Yamaha will sound like ordinary brands enough to please most people, while Denon will have extra advantage in warm and crisp sound to please audiophile people.

Yamaha RX-V375 or Denon AVR-1513, I would go for Yamaha
*
Thanks for your opinon! In the mean time I'm like 60:40 on Yamaha compared to Denon..... blink.gif
SSJBen
post Feb 12 2016, 10:24 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


The 479 is fine, but at an extra RM500+ I don't think it's worth it. Might as well go for the 679 to future proof yourself when you upgrade to a HDR compatible TV (yes, HDR IS a big deal). Only the 679 and up range are getting HDR support.

The 479 may have a little more power, but you're only pushing a pair of bookshelves of which the 379 is very adequate at. If and when you want to upgrade to a full 5.1 (or more) system, then it'd be easy to sell the 379 down the road and budget yourself for a full system upgrade. The 479 makes very little sense, value wise unless you can get it below RM1.5k.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 10:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 12 2016, 10:24 PM)
The 479 is fine, but at an extra RM500+ I don't think it's worth it. Might as well go for the 679 to future proof yourself when you upgrade to a HDR compatible TV (yes, HDR IS a big deal). Only the 679 and up range are getting HDR support.

The 479 may have a little more power, but you're only pushing a pair of bookshelves of which the 379 is very adequate at. If and when you want to upgrade to a full 5.1 (or more) system, then it'd be easy to sell the 379 down the road and budget yourself for a full system upgrade. The 479 makes very little sense, value wise unless you can get it below RM1.5k.
*
Thanks for your insight Ben! Currently the Yamaha RX V379 is selling for RM1599 on an online website. The features really excites me! wub.gif

Now if I can balance up my budget with either satellite speakers with subwoofer or bookshelf speakers? hmm.gif
SSJBen
post Feb 12 2016, 11:07 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 12 2016, 10:48 PM)
Thanks for your insight Ben! Currently the Yamaha RX V379 is selling for RM1599 on an online website. The features really excites me!  wub.gif

Now if I can balance up my budget with either satellite speakers with subwoofer or bookshelf speakers?  hmm.gif
*
It's RM1399 at Desa Home Theater last I checked (a month ago). Might be even cheaper if you can haggle a bit.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 11:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 12 2016, 11:07 PM)
It's RM1399 at Desa Home Theater last I checked (a month ago). Might be even cheaper if you can haggle a bit.
*
Another local online store selling for RM1499!

Desa Home Theater in Kepong? Well I bought my Denon 1311 + JBL satelite speakers (with subwoofer) + bluray player from there few years back. RM1399 seems like a better price! brows.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 12 2016, 11:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
I saw (Desa Home Theatre) they have a promotion back on October last year on Yamaha RX-V477B AV Receiver for only RM1099! shakehead.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 13 2016, 12:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Without promotion, YAMAHA RX-V477 currently selling about RM1399. Any comment? blush.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: Feb 13 2016, 12:22 AM
sonerin
post Feb 13 2016, 07:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
If you want to go up one level better to go latest model
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 13 2016, 08:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 13 2016, 07:28 AM)
If you want to go up one level better to go latest model
*
I'm thinking if the price between YAMAHA RX-V379 & YAMAHA RX-V477 just different of RM100+, why not taking V477..... hmm.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 13 2016, 08:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Dolby Atmos vs. Auro3D



rolleyes.gif
sonerin
post Feb 13 2016, 09:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Well 379 is newer model is more worth to get it
radovantz
post Feb 15 2016, 12:31 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


I would go for the 477 considering the greater amplifier power than the 300s series, also got full 5 channel banana plug speaker terminal at the rear. Last year I bought the 477 for RM1799, it was a quick last minute decision because I was about to buy the 377. About gadget features, I don't really use them smile.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 15 2016, 12:45 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(radovantz @ Feb 15 2016, 12:31 AM)
I would go for the 477 considering the greater amplifier power than the 300s series, also got full 5 channel banana plug speaker terminal at the rear. Last year I bought the 477 for RM1799, it was a quick last minute decision because I was about to buy the 377. About gadget features, I don't really use them smile.gif
*
Thanks for another opinion. I was thinking 379 or 477 but with price difference of RM100+, why not go for 477. Agree mates? hmm.gif
SSJBen
post Feb 15 2016, 03:06 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Yes 477 > 379. Go for it.
myxery
post Feb 15 2016, 07:17 AM

Oro?!
*****
Senior Member
904 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Tanjong Golden Ville
QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 12 2016, 07:15 AM)
I support Yamaha as is local made
*
Mind to share what set of speaker to pair with yamaha avr?
sonerin
post Feb 15 2016, 07:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(myxery @ Feb 15 2016, 07:17 AM)
Mind to share what set of speaker to pair with yamaha avr?
*
You can try q acoustics.
myxery
post Feb 15 2016, 04:44 PM

Oro?!
*****
Senior Member
904 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Tanjong Golden Ville
QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 15 2016, 07:18 AM)
You can try q acoustics.
*
how much the price for q acoustics
sonerin
post Feb 15 2016, 05:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
1 pair of bookshelf should be below 2k.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 15 2016, 07:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
I wish to have a pair of bookshelf but then again it would be out of my budget if I add on with subwoofer compared with satellite speakers that comes with subwoofer. Am I right? hmm.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 15 2016, 07:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image

I am using a JBL satelite speakers with a subwoofer like above currently in my living hall. I wanted black but out of stock and they gave me this grey colour. doh.gif

I bought around RM900-RM1000 if not mistaken at DESA HOME THEATRE in Kepong. smile.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 15 2016, 08:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image

Denon DHT-1312XP
Price: RM1089


Pros
•Solid sound quality
•Great value
•Onscreen user interface

Cons
•Speaker build quality
•Light on features
•Fiddly setup with supplied cables
•Overly brash at times, lacking Denon’s usual smoothness

The review and rating not so convincing tho. sad.gif








This post has been edited by jovigrunge: Feb 15 2016, 08:13 PM
ktek
post Feb 15 2016, 08:28 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
just oem spkr with branding license.

my experience is spend front unit with most budget.
they work the most for mixed listening.
side & subwoofer are compliment during movie, which u can leave without them due to limited budget
sonerin
post Feb 16 2016, 09:02 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
For home theater the center speaker is the most important follow by front than the surrounds. Of course not to forget about sub. Movies cannot be without sub 😜
SUSMatrix
post Feb 16 2016, 09:05 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 7 2016, 07:11 PM)
I'm thinking about getting an AV receiver & satellite speakers with subwoofer but before I blindly buy into any of these stuff, I need to know which is the most reliable brand for an av receiver and also for satellite speakers with subwoofer. By the way I have a tight budget!  blush.gif

1. Which brand is the most reliable in terms of quality & worth the money?  hmm.gif
2. My budget is around RM900 - RM1300 (AV receiver) & RM800 - RM1200 (satellite speakers with subwoofer)  icon_rolleyes.gif
3. I'm going to put it into my master room.  tongue.gif

Your thoughts please?  icon_question.gif
*
1. Budget is too low for discrete equipment. Only enough for those All-in-one package.
2. Unless you have proper space to put and wire the surround sound speaker/placement, i said forget it, and look for a soundbar instead.

This post has been edited by Matrix: Feb 16 2016, 09:06 AM
radovantz
post Feb 16 2016, 11:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


If budget is limited, I suggest step by step investment in your setup. Much better than investing in cheap product one shot.

Buy the most important equipment first, then add the other equipment later.

Firstly, get a receiver and player. Try to find the good quality center, left and right speaker from the same model. This 3 channel is the most important channel in home theater. (Don't set surround speaker as NO in your receiver if you want to hear more detail). Now you can enjoy the movie.

Secondly, get a pair of surround, also if possible find the surround speaker from the same model like the front speakers. Standard speakers (aiwa, sony, etc) also can be use as surround, just to add surround effect. Normally surround speakers is not to be set as loud as the front speakers.

Thirdly, find a good subwoofer. While waiting for subwoofer to came in, you still can enjoy the movie with good sound quality produced by the 3 front speakers.

This post has been edited by radovantz: Feb 16 2016, 11:33 AM
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 16 2016, 02:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 16 2016, 09:02 AM)
For home theater the center speaker is the most important follow by front than the surrounds. Of course not to forget about sub. Movies cannot be without sub 😜
*
Tq. notworthy.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 16 2016, 02:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(Matrix @ Feb 16 2016, 09:05 AM)
1. Budget is too low for discrete equipment. Only enough for those All-in-one package.
2. Unless you have proper space to put and wire the surround sound speaker/placement, i said forget it, and look for a soundbar instead.
*
Any value for money soundbar to recommend? hmm.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 16 2016, 02:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(radovantz @ Feb 16 2016, 11:29 AM)
If budget is limited, I suggest step by step investment in your setup. Much better than investing in cheap product one shot.

Buy the most important equipment first, then add the other equipment later.

Firstly, get a receiver and player. Try to find the good quality center, left and right speaker from the same model. This 3 channel is the most important channel in home theater. (Don't set surround speaker as NO in your receiver if you want to hear more detail). Now you can enjoy the movie.

Secondly, get a pair of surround, also if possible find the surround speaker from the same model like the front speakers. Standard speakers (aiwa, sony, etc) also can be use as surround, just to add surround effect. Normally surround speakers is not to be set as loud as the front speakers.

Thirdly, find a good subwoofer. While waiting for subwoofer to came in, you still can enjoy the movie with good sound quality produced by the 3 front speakers.
*
Sounds like a great plan.

At the moment highly very likely I'll go for a YAMAHA avr.

Now as for the speakers.......bookshelf or satelite? blush.gif
SSJBen
post Feb 16 2016, 02:43 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 16 2016, 02:28 PM)
Any value for money soundbar to recommend?  hmm.gif
*
For your budget of 1300 + 1200, the Sony HT RT5 (RM2.2k).

Will actually sound better than that craptacular Denon 1312 set.
Alternatively, you can opt for a Yamaha NSP40 system which is at least more decent than the Denon.

Again, I don't suggest you opt this route if ultimately you are going to have a full HT setup. You will lose more money in the end.

It's actually a very simple choice for your budget which I'm not sure why you are still pondering on.

2.5k budget breaks down to:
- 2x Sony SS-CS3 floorstanders (RM1200)
- 1x Yamaha V477 AVR (1.4k)
- Top up RM100

You might be asking, wth no sub?!@#!@$
The real harsh truth is that all those cheap subs you see in HTiB or AIO systems are horrendous. The CS3 floorstanders can produce bass way better than any of them, with ease.

Your path to upgrading is pretty much only limited by your wallet after this, rather than replacing EVERYTHING.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 16 2016, 02:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 16 2016, 02:43 PM)
For your budget of 1300 + 1200, the Sony HT RT5 (RM2.2k).

Will actually sound better than that craptacular Denon 1312 set.
Alternatively, you can opt for a Yamaha NSP40 system which is at least more decent than the Denon.

Again, I don't suggest you opt this route if ultimately you are going to have a full HT setup. You will lose more money in the end.

It's actually a very simple choice for your budget which I'm not sure why you are still pondering on.

2.5k budget breaks down to:
- 2x Sony SS-CS3 floorstanders (RM1200)
- 1x Yamaha V477 AVR (1.4k)
- Top up RM100

You might be asking, wth no sub?!@#!@$
The real harsh truth is that all those cheap subs you see in HTiB or AIO systems are horrendous. The CS3 floorstanders can produce bass way better than any of them, with ease.

Your path to upgrading is pretty much only limited by your wallet after this, rather than replacing EVERYTHING.
*
I'll check the 2x Sony SS-CS3 floorstanders (RM1200) soon. smile.gif

radovantz
post Feb 16 2016, 02:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 16 2016, 02:35 PM)
Now as for the speakers.......bookshelf or satelite?  blush.gif
*
For home theater, I would suggest to pick up speakers with frequency response covering 80Hz.
Example 50Hz - 20kHz or 80Hz - 20kHz, as long as the 80Hz frequency is coverred, then it is ok.
If the speaker cannot cover 80Hz for example 120Hz - 20kHz, more likely no bass will be produced through the speaker, not enough impact. But for surround is ok.

Some speaker packages don't cover 80Hz by its satellites, but to be handled by the subwoofer. Be careful when choosing this kind of package. Need to listen them first. Some of them may have hole in frequency, i.e gap between High Frequency and Low Frequency is too obvious. Some good packages may have all of their speakers well integrated each other.

Also need to see sensitivity. Try not to use speaker lower than 86dB because it will be power hungry, you turn high volume but still can't go loud. 86db and above should be ok. Lower sensitivity speaker like 85dB will need more powerful amplifier to drive them sufficiently.

This post has been edited by radovantz: Feb 16 2016, 03:05 PM
radovantz
post Feb 16 2016, 03:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 16 2016, 02:43 PM)
For your budget of 1300 + 1200, the Sony HT RT5 (RM2.2k).

Will actually sound better than that craptacular Denon 1312 set.
Alternatively, you can opt for a Yamaha NSP40 system which is at least more decent than the Denon.


*
Wow, very good info. Thanks thumbup.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 16 2016, 03:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(radovantz @ Feb 16 2016, 03:03 PM)
Wow, very good info. Thanks  thumbup.gif
*
I got a strange feeling that Denon 1312 speaker set going to be craptacular anyway.... wink.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: Feb 16 2016, 03:29 PM
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 16 2016, 03:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


wub.gif
radovantz
post Feb 16 2016, 03:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 16 2016, 03:24 PM)
I got a strange feeling that Denon 1312 speaker set gong to be craptacular tho....  wink.gif
*
Denon speaker SC-M series is ok. SC-M series is actually using Mission parts.
Other series not sure about the quality, try avoid them smile.gif
SSJBen
post Feb 16 2016, 04:41 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


My impressions (not review!) on the RT5 was here: https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=77375007

tldr; Decent at best soundbar, nothing great, but not bad either.
Eng_Tat
post Feb 17 2016, 12:03 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,215 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Cheras, KL.


hi, any one here tested/auditioned Sony SS-CS3 against Pioneer SP-FS52 (RM800/pair)? tq
tharmaraj
post Feb 17 2016, 10:43 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
312 posts

Joined: Apr 2015


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 9 2016, 04:00 PM)
user posted image

Sony SS-CS5   smile.gif
*
I'm really interested with this speaker. Can recommend where can I buy? I don't want buy online though. Btw. does this speakers comes with Banana Plug connectors. The current speaker cables I have are all banana plug connectors.

Thanks everyone!

cheers
Raj tongue.gif
radovantz
post Feb 17 2016, 10:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


I will use Sony speaker only if I have Sony amplifier to connect it with smile.gif
Sadly Sony amplifier is currently not available in Malaysia.
SSJBen
post Feb 17 2016, 04:10 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Eng_Tat @ Feb 17 2016, 12:03 AM)
hi, any one here tested/auditioned Sony SS-CS3 against Pioneer SP-FS52 (RM800/pair)? tq
*
Everything the FS52 can do, the CS3 just does better. Tonality, transparency, neutrality, detail retrieval, soundstage, low end thump, pretty much everything, the CS3 > FS52. The only thing the FS52 beats the CS3 at is price.

RM800 vs RM1200 (pair), is the CS3 worth the extra RM400? IMO yes. The FS52 can often times struggle with very dynamic bass or very sharp treble, when any source that has these kind of load, the FS52 just can't handle the transient load and worse still, distort. The CS3? Believe me when I say this, it doesn't. Mind blowing that Sony could achieve something of such balance at this price point, on a floorstander.

tldr; The FS52 sounds constrained, dull and struggles when place side by side in comparison to the CS3, in the same environment condition, fed with the same source.


QUOTE(tharmaraj @ Feb 17 2016, 10:43 AM)
I'm really interested with this speaker. Can recommend where can I buy? I don't want buy online though. Btw. does this speakers comes with Banana Plug connectors. The current speaker cables I have are all banana plug connectors.

Thanks everyone!

cheers
Raj  tongue.gif
*
Special order from Sony Malaysia.
Call them.

And yes, they use banana plug connections.


QUOTE(radovantz @ Feb 17 2016, 10:50 AM)
I will use Sony speaker only if I have Sony amplifier to connect it with smile.gif
Sadly Sony amplifier is currently not available in Malaysia.
*
It is.
Sony is selling the DN1060 now, RM2.6k + free BDP S7200 + free MDR-1ABT headphones.

Yes you read that right, insane value.

But to be honest, I don't think the DN1060's nature of wide soundstage, laid back sound is a good match for the Core series speakers. The Core series speakers are already very neutral, in fact some might even say it's a bit too bright and on the cold side. You'd want a semi-warm receiver/amp.

If discrete amp like the TA-A1ES, you'll need to special order from them. But again, I don't think they're a good match either for the Core series speakers.
Eng_Tat
post Feb 17 2016, 05:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,215 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Cheras, KL.


SSJben, do you know how much is the book shelf and center? tq
SSJBen
post Feb 17 2016, 05:50 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


700 for CS5 (bookshelve)
500 for the CS8 (center)
Eng_Tat
post Feb 17 2016, 05:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,215 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Cheras, KL.


thanks, is this rrp? or we will get cheaper/any where that we can audition? biggrin.gif look good to start a 3.1 ht.

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 17 2016, 05:50 PM)
700 for CS5 (bookshelve)
500 for the CS8 (center)
*
SSJBen
post Feb 17 2016, 06:20 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Eng_Tat @ Feb 17 2016, 05:57 PM)
thanks, is this rrp? or we will get cheaper/any where that we can audition? biggrin.gif look good to start a 3.1 ht.
*
That's the price from Sony and it's the only price you'll ever get, officially.
The Core Series speakers was never meant to be sold in Malaysia, but seeing there was interest, Sony just brought in a few models to gauge how well it will sell.

No retailers will have the Core series speakers for sale as Sony isn't planning to distribute them, not for now at least.

As to where can audition, only in Sony KLCC.
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 17 2016, 10:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image + user posted image + user posted image = $644.00
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 17 2016, 10:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
As much as I loved wireless but if it's for music probably I won't care much but if it's for movies I opted for wired speakers. hmm.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 17 2016, 10:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
2.5k budget breaks down to:
- 2x Sony SS-CS3 floorstanders (RM1200)
- 1x Yamaha V477 AVR (1.4k)
- Top up RM100

Good suggestion..... notworthy.gif
tharmaraj
post Feb 18 2016, 03:52 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
312 posts

Joined: Apr 2015


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 17 2016, 04:10 PM)
Everything the FS52 can do, the CS3 just does better. Tonality, transparency, neutrality, detail retrieval, soundstage, low end thump, pretty much everything, the CS3 > FS52. The only thing the FS52 beats the CS3 at is price.

RM800 vs RM1200 (pair), is the CS3 worth the extra RM400? IMO yes. The FS52 can often times struggle with very dynamic bass or very sharp treble, when any source that has these kind of load, the FS52 just can't handle the transient load and worse still, distort. The CS3? Believe me when I say this, it doesn't. Mind blowing that Sony could achieve something of such balance at this price point, on a floorstander.

tldr; The FS52 sounds constrained, dull and struggles when place side by side in comparison to the CS3, in the same environment condition, fed with the same source.
Special order from Sony Malaysia.
Call them.

And yes, they use banana plug connections.
It is.
Sony is selling the DN1060 now, RM2.6k + free BDP S7200 + free MDR-1ABT headphones.

Yes you read that right, insane value.

But to be honest, I don't think the DN1060's nature of wide soundstage, laid back sound is a good match for the Core series speakers. The Core series speakers are already very neutral, in fact some might even say it's a bit too bright and on the cold side. You'd want a semi-warm receiver/amp.

If discrete amp like the TA-A1ES, you'll need to special order from them. But again, I don't think they're a good match either for the Core series speakers.
*
Thank you Sir...for replying my post. So I guess I can only buy them via Sony Store online for RM699.00. Only worried about delivery (damage to the goods) hmm.gif

cheers
Raj
pokchik
post Feb 19 2016, 01:24 AM

I'm getting too old for this sh*t
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


QUOTE(tharmaraj @ Feb 18 2016, 03:52 AM)
Thank you Sir...for replying my post. So I guess I can only buy them via Sony Store online for RM699.00. Only worried about delivery (damage to the goods)  hmm.gif

cheers
Raj
*
or you can go to the nearest sony center to purchase them.

you know, the ones in KLCC or Midvalley.. you can call them up first to check if they're selling them.
SSJBen
post Feb 19 2016, 02:16 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


The Core series speakers is ONLY selling in KLCC, for now (and the near future). Also, they need to be back ordered.

AFAIK, Sony Malaysia is planning to bring more units in.
sonerin
post Feb 19 2016, 07:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 19 2016, 02:16 AM)
The Core series speakers is ONLY selling in KLCC, for now (and the near future). Also, they need to be back ordered.

AFAIK, Sony Malaysia is planning to bring more units in.
*
Sony really trying to make a come back
khaiandrew
post Feb 19 2016, 09:44 AM

Fuji <3
******
Senior Member
1,271 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Petaling Jaya



Bought the sony sscs5 speakers, any recommended budget amp/receiver to go with? The cheaper the better, <500 preferred smile.gif
SSJBen
post Feb 19 2016, 03:43 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 19 2016, 07:52 AM)
Sony really trying to make a come back
*
Eh. They're too inconsistent to really be a big force in the audio market. They would come out with a great product then milk the hell out of it for the next 5 years, releasing garbage after garbage as fillers.

Yes, here's hoping they get their act together because I've always had a soft spot for Sony. But facts are facts, they need to be consistent for a long stretch of time, not just 1 year and clap hooray.

Love the Core series speakers, they're definitely a leg up over the Pioneer AJ speakers.
ktek
post Feb 19 2016, 04:53 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
not bad pricing for dn1060 package. i wonder any user now or demo available?
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 19 2016, 04:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(khaiandrew @ Feb 19 2016, 09:44 AM)
Bought the sony sscs5 speakers, any recommended budget amp/receiver to go with? The cheaper the better, <500 preferred smile.gif
*
Any comment about your Sony SSCS5? Appreciated! notworthy.gif
SSJBen
post Feb 19 2016, 05:52 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ktek @ Feb 19 2016, 04:53 PM)
not bad pricing for dn1060 package. i wonder any user now or demo available?
*
Pricing is actually insanely good lol. Why? Because it comes with free BD-7200 player and a MDR1ABT headphone. You sell both off at 80% price from new and the DN1060 is like only 1.4k.

The DN1060 also doesn't sound half bad, in fact very good. Great soundstage, good imaging, punchy dynamics (lol not Sony's forte at all previously).
Too bad it falls short on the video department though, only ONE HDCP 2.2 capable port (ridiculous), no HDR support via firmware, only 1 port does 4:4:4 @ 60hz and input lag that cannot be eradicated.

Then there's the reliability.... well, the 1060 hasn't been out that long yet to hear about the horror stories of Sony receivers going dead for no reason what so ever.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Feb 19 2016, 06:21 PM
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 19 2016, 05:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
To be honest the only thing I trust about SONY was their smartphones. nod.gif
sonerin
post Feb 19 2016, 06:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 19 2016, 05:57 PM)
To be honest the only thing I trust about SONY was their smartphones.  nod.gif
*
I do support on their TV
ktek
post Feb 19 2016, 07:14 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 19 2016, 05:52 PM)
Pricing is actually insanely good lol. Why? Because it comes with free BD-7200 player and a MDR1ABT headphone. You sell both off at 80% price from new and the DN1060 is like only 1.4k.
The DN1060 also doesn't sound half bad, in fact very good. Great soundstage, good imaging, punchy dynamics (lol not Sony's forte at all previously).
Too bad it falls short on the video department though, only ONE HDCP 2.2 capable port (ridiculous), no HDR support via firmware, only 1 port does 4:4:4 @ 60hz and input lag that cannot be eradicated.
Then there's the reliability.... well, the 1060 hasn't been out that long yet to hear about the horror stories of Sony receivers going dead for no reason what so ever.
*

weakness is acceptable for its price. i decided
pls dont advertise too much, im buying it soon.
afraid out of stok like mcd toys or shell lego then no review from me.

QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 19 2016, 05:57 PM)
To be honest the only thing I trust about SONY was their smartphones.  nod.gif
*
cyber shot x walkman x xperia

This post has been edited by ktek: Feb 19 2016, 07:20 PM
sonerin
post Feb 19 2016, 08:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(ktek @ Feb 19 2016, 07:14 PM)
weakness is acceptable for its price. i decided
pls dont advertise too much, im buying it soon.
afraid out of stok like mcd toys or shell lego then no review from me.
cyber shot x walkman x xperia
*
No Atmos and no dts x. Feel like outdated avr
SSJBen
post Feb 19 2016, 10:03 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ktek @ Feb 19 2016, 07:14 PM)
weakness is acceptable for its price. i decided
pls dont advertise too much, im buying it soon.
afraid out of stok like mcd toys or shell lego then no review from me.
cyber shot x walkman x xperia
*
Got plenty la, don't worry.


QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 19 2016, 08:55 PM)
No Atmos and no dts x. Feel like outdated avr
*
Show me a 1.4k AVR with Atmos or DTS X. tongue.gif

But on a serious note, their latest 1070 also doesn't include Atmos nor DTS X. Sadly. I think Sony missed the ball there.
sonerin
post Feb 19 2016, 10:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 19 2016, 10:03 PM)
Got plenty la, don't worry.
Show me a 1.4k AVR with Atmos or DTS X. tongue.gif

But on a serious note, their latest 1070 also doesn't include Atmos nor DTS X. Sadly. I think Sony missed the ball there.
*
Is true Sony kind miss when everyone is going at atmos
SSJBen
post Feb 19 2016, 10:15 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ Feb 19 2016, 10:10 PM)
Is true Sony kind miss when everyone is going at atmos
*
Indeed, considering the 1070 will also cost 2.7k. If it supports Atmos (which if you look at design and specs, it's entirely capable of doing so), it'd pretty much murder the Onkyo 646.

Sony just don't want to pay for the licensing.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Feb 19 2016, 10:15 PM
sonerin
post Feb 20 2016, 06:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 19 2016, 10:15 PM)
Indeed, considering the 1070 will also cost 2.7k. If it supports Atmos (which if you look at design and specs, it's entirely capable of doing so), it'd pretty much murder the Onkyo 646.

Sony just don't want to pay for the licensing.
*
Very bad move
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 20 2016, 04:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010



For those who hasn't entered the world of Dolby Atmos like me.... sad.gif
tharmaraj
post Feb 24 2016, 07:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
312 posts

Joined: Apr 2015


QUOTE(khaiandrew @ Feb 19 2016, 09:44 AM)
Bought the sony sscs5 speakers, any recommended budget amp/receiver to go with? The cheaper the better, <500 preferred smile.gif
*
Hey buddy, care to share where you bought the speakers? I ordered online via Sony Store Malaysia and they are yet to call me with regards to my order sad.gif

Look forward for your feedback notworthy.gif

cheers
Raj
sonerin
post Feb 24 2016, 09:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 20 2016, 04:31 PM)



For those who hasn't entered the world of Dolby Atmos like me....  sad.gif
*
If you really want to enter atmos you will need the over head speaker to be really using it
radovantz
post Feb 25 2016, 09:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
287 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 20 2016, 04:31 PM)

For those who hasn't entered the world of Dolby Atmos like me....  sad.gif
*
Many things to consider first before jumping into Atmos home theater.
No point of having Atmos if sound quality is abandoned. Should have invest in sound quality first, like choosing good speakers for basic 5.1 channel, until we are very satisfied with it.
Also need to invest in making listening room as comfort as possible.
Then Atmos (and surround back) would be the very last thing do.
Okay to have Atmos AVR first but it doesn't mean we have to use it immediately.
khaiandrew
post Feb 25 2016, 09:45 AM

Fuji <3
******
Senior Member
1,271 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(tharmaraj @ Feb 24 2016, 07:23 PM)
Hey buddy, care to share where you bought the speakers? I ordered online via Sony Store Malaysia and they are yet to call me with regards to my order  sad.gif

Look forward for your feedback  notworthy.gif

cheers
Raj
*
Sony Store the Curve, they ordered from KLCC, I got it the next day smile.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 26 2016, 12:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
I would love to have the Yamaha RX-V479. Anyone knows the lowest price? icon_question.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Feb 26 2016, 01:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
smile.gif
ktek
post Feb 26 2016, 01:25 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 26 2016, 12:49 AM)
I would love to have the Yamaha RX-V479. Anyone knows the lowest price?  icon_question.gif
*
good choice below rm2k ask Sentinel92

This post has been edited by ktek: Feb 26 2016, 01:26 PM
tharmaraj
post Feb 26 2016, 04:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
312 posts

Joined: Apr 2015


QUOTE(khaiandrew @ Feb 25 2016, 09:45 AM)
Sony Store the Curve, they ordered from KLCC, I got it the next day  smile.gif
*
Thanks for your reply. Just called Sony@The Curv and they have the stock at their place. Going there tomorrow to get the speakers. Btw. just to double confirm, the speaker connector at the back using "banana" plug connectors?

Thanks again for your reply, appreciated. biggrin.gif

cheers
Raj
tharmaraj
post Feb 26 2016, 04:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
312 posts

Joined: Apr 2015


Btw. any good Sub-Woofer recommendation below RM1K?

thanks!
Raj
SSJBen
post Feb 26 2016, 08:38 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(tharmaraj @ Feb 26 2016, 04:17 PM)
Thanks for your reply. Just called Sony@The Curv and they have the stock at their place. Going there tomorrow to get the speakers. Btw. just to double confirm, the speaker connector at the back using "banana" plug connectors?

Thanks again for your reply, appreciated. biggrin.gif

cheers
Raj
*
Yes banana plugs on all the core series speakers actually.


QUOTE(tharmaraj @ Feb 26 2016, 04:19 PM)
Btw. any good Sub-Woofer recommendation below RM1K?

thanks!
Raj
*
If you are gonna get a sub below 1k you might as well don't bother getting a sub. Wasting money for garbage, mostly.

If you are getting the CS3, its bass is actually quite adequate. It won't rumble your floors or tear down your walls, but will definitely give you that chest thump. Best of all, it doesn't distort like a complete mess like most cheap sub 1k subs.
tharmaraj
post Feb 26 2016, 10:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
312 posts

Joined: Apr 2015


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 26 2016, 08:38 PM)
Yes banana plugs on all the core series speakers actually.
If you are gonna get a sub below 1k you might as well don't bother getting a sub. Wasting money for garbage, mostly.

If you are getting the CS3, its bass is actually quite adequate. It won't rumble your floors or tear down your walls, but will definitely give you that chest thump. Best of all, it doesn't distort like a complete mess like most cheap sub 1k subs.
*
Again, thank you Sir for your advice. This is the advice I need instead wasting my money on cheap woofer. I guess I will stick with CS3 at the moment until I have enough $$$$ for a woofer.

Thanks again and have a good weekend thumbup.gif

cheers
Raj

This post has been edited by tharmaraj: Feb 26 2016, 10:12 PM
sonerin
post Feb 27 2016, 07:08 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(tharmaraj @ Feb 26 2016, 10:10 PM)
Again, thank you Sir for your advice. This is the advice I need instead wasting my money on cheap woofer. I guess I will stick with CS3 at the moment until I have enough $$$$ for a woofer.

Thanks again and have a good weekend  thumbup.gif

cheers
Raj
*
SVS will be your target
SSJBen
post Feb 28 2016, 10:21 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(tharmaraj @ Feb 26 2016, 10:10 PM)
Again, thank you Sir for your advice. This is the advice I need instead wasting my money on cheap woofer. I guess I will stick with CS3 at the moment until I have enough $$$$ for a woofer.

Thanks again and have a good weekend  thumbup.gif

cheers
Raj
*
Speaker placement is important too, especially more so for floorstanders.

Generally the closer your speakers are to the wall, the more boomy the bass is and if you stick too close, it can cloud the mids and become muddy. But since the CS3 are front ported, there aren't issues with port flaring so you can adjust them more front or back towards your preference.

Experiment around, read up and do research.
stevenycs
post Mar 13 2016, 09:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Petaling Jaya


my Onkyo HTS-5300 7.1 AVR finally died on me after 4 years. Very sad. Been sending to the service shop almost annually due to burned capacitor and stuff. now thy told me one of the main board burnt and repair cost mounted to 800++. so decided to get a new AVR unit to replace it.

Been surveying and found this Yamaha RX-V379 unit. Cheapest I saw now is 1699 without the speakers. As I am using back Onkyo 7.1 (speakers). Just wanna know if any bros in here had any review on this HTB-379 unit? thanks.

This post has been edited by stevenycs: Mar 13 2016, 09:46 PM
ktek
post Mar 13 2016, 10:07 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(stevenycs @ Mar 13 2016, 09:44 PM)
my Onkyo HTS-5300 7.1 AVR finally died on me after 4 years. Very sad. Been sending to the service shop almost annually due to burned capacitor and stuff. now thy told me one of the main board burnt and repair cost mounted to 800++. so decided to get a new AVR unit to replace it.

Been surveying and found this Yamaha RX-V379 unit. Cheapest I saw now is 1699 without the speakers. As I am using back Onkyo 7.1 (speakers). Just wanna know if any bros in here had any review on this HTB-379 unit? thanks.
*
very basic, work just right it design for small room
stevenycs
post Mar 13 2016, 10:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 13 2016, 10:07 PM)
very basic, work just right it design for small room
*
I just saw RX-V479 model. Seems better with additional 2 HDMI in and Wifi support too.
Maybe go for this if the price not that much of a different.
thanks for the reply.

UPDATE: Just got myself RX-V479 instead today with 5 years E.W. thumbsup.gif

This post has been edited by stevenycs: Mar 14 2016, 11:06 PM
teop
post Mar 19 2016, 12:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
Hi newbie here using RX-V679. I need some advice on speakers setup.

1. How significant is a 5.1 vs 7.1 setup? Is it worth it especially considering that I would watch only 3 titles/year.

2. Is there a significant difference between using small surround speakers vs. larger ones?

3. Due to living room design, the most convenient location for my surround speakers is about 40/45 degrees behind listening position at 2.9m/2.5m distance. Is that ok or it would be much better to put it at 2/-2 degrees @ 2.2m/2.2m distance?

Thanks.
sonerin
post Mar 19 2016, 06:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 19 2016, 12:35 AM)
Hi newbie here using RX-V679. I need some advice on speakers setup.

1. How significant is a 5.1 vs 7.1 setup? Is it worth it especially considering that I would watch only 3 titles/year.

2. Is there a significant difference between using small surround speakers vs. larger ones?

3. Due to living room design, the most convenient location for my surround speakers is about 40/45 degrees behind listening position at 2.9m/2.5m distance. Is that ok or it would be much better to put it at 2/-2 degrees @ 2.2m/2.2m distance?

Thanks.
*
5.1 will do. Larger speaker is always better. SiZe does matter. The distant is best to keep within 2 meters as most likely your surround speaker size is small which is not enough if distance is far
Ngto
post Mar 19 2016, 09:41 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 19 2016, 12:35 AM)
Hi newbie here using RX-V679. I need some advice on speakers setup.

1. How significant is a 5.1 vs 7.1 setup? Is it worth it especially considering that I would watch only 3 titles/year.

2. Is there a significant difference between using small surround speakers vs. larger ones?

3. Due to living room design, the most convenient location for my surround speakers is about 40/45 degrees behind listening position at 2.9m/2.5m distance. Is that ok or it would be much better to put it at 2/-2 degrees @ 2.2m/2.2m distance?

Thanks.
*
If only watching 3 titles per yr, save your money, sell everything and go Cinema watch.
ktek
post Mar 19 2016, 02:12 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(stevenycs @ Mar 13 2016, 10:17 PM)
I just saw RX-V479 model. Seems better with additional 2 HDMI in and Wifi support too.
Maybe go for this if the price not that much of a different.
thanks for the reply.

UPDATE: Just got myself RX-V479 instead today with 5 years E.W.  :thumbsup:
*
congrats bro. welcome to.yamaha
ktek
post Mar 19 2016, 02:15 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 19 2016, 12:35 AM)
Hi newbie here using RX-V679. I need some advice on speakers setup.

1. How significant is a 5.1 vs 7.1 setup? Is it worth it especially considering that I would watch only 3 titles/year.

2. Is there a significant difference between using small surround speakers vs. larger ones?

3. Due to living room design, the most convenient location for my surround speakers is about 40/45 degrees behind listening position at 2.9m/2.5m distance. Is that ok or it would be much better to put it at 2/-2 degrees @ 2.2m/2.2m distance?

Thanks.
*
put side will give wrap around effect.
put rear corner will give suprise attack effect.
SUSsupersound
post Mar 19 2016, 02:30 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 19 2016, 12:35 AM)
Hi newbie here using RX-V679. I need some advice on speakers setup.

1. How significant is a 5.1 vs 7.1 setup? Is it worth it especially considering that I would watch only 3 titles/year.

2. Is there a significant difference between using small surround speakers vs. larger ones?

3. Due to living room design, the most convenient location for my surround speakers is about 40/45 degrees behind listening position at 2.9m/2.5m distance. Is that ok or it would be much better to put it at 2/-2 degrees @ 2.2m/2.2m distance?

Thanks.
*
1. Depending on how the speakers perform, a brand that spending more money on doing advertisement but using a speaker that only has the abilities to reveal 3 instruments from a source that actually having 7 instruments playing, at any 1 time a stereo setup that using speakers that has the abilities to reveal 7 instruments playing will whack a 13.1 setup.
2. same as above, size does not matters, more on how the enclosure being designed. I've DIY a speaker that using 4" driver which using tapped horn design, blind fold a self claim audiophile(that spending rm50k for a pair of midbass + tweeter), let him listen and he thought was a 10" subwoofer playing.
3. only your ears will tell you which is the best listening position, if anyone that can simply comes out a number without knowing your height, your room size, what is in that room, he is basically a dumb that pretend to be an expert.
SSJBen
post Mar 19 2016, 05:53 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


5.1 vs 7.1 depends so much on the room dimensions. So many people do not take into account about their room dimension and simply just add speakers, then complain that it either sounds worse or has zero improvements. The same reason why stereo can potentially sound as immersive as a 5 channel setup. More doesn't always mean better in audio.

Room is nearly as critical as the choice of speakers IMO.

In a proper room, even a 5.1.2 (or 5.2.2 preferably) setup is more immersive than a 7.1 (or 7.2 prerably) setup. A 5.2.4 setup can actually sound as good as a 7.2.2 setup even. It's all about balance and room conditions.
teop
post Mar 20 2016, 01:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 19 2016, 06:31 AM)
5.1 will do. Larger speaker is always better. SiZe does matter. The distant is best to keep within 2 meters as most likely your surround speaker size is small which is not enough if distance is far
*
Actually I'm not using a subwoofer, so it is really a 5.0 system, right? So far I'm happy with the loudness. I feel that my floor stand works pretty well. Casual listening is at -35db and if I blast it it will be at -25db. YPAO did add 2.5/1.5db to my surround.

Though I did notice that if placed closer, the sound is more distinct and easier to pin point. Not sure if that is a good or bad attribute.

Currently the sound coming from surround sound pretty neutral, as in evenly distributed, so it does not sound overly discrete.

QUOTE(Ngto @ Mar 19 2016, 09:41 AM)
If only watching 3 titles per yr, save your money, sell everything and go Cinema watch.
*
But seriously, how many title comes out in a year that is worth watching where surround matters.
The rest of the time is either mostly listening to music daily or watching TV.

QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 19 2016, 02:12 PM)
congrats bro. welcome to.yamaha
*
Thanks for having me.

QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 19 2016, 02:15 PM)
put side will give wrap around effect.
put rear corner will give suprise attack effect.
*
When you say put to the side or rear do you mean physically, change channel (from surround to surround back) or both?

If you just shift the speakers for the surround channel further back, will YPAO/DSP know about it and makes adjustments accordingly? I don't want sound that is meant for the side to come out from the rear because it was placed too further back.

QUOTE(supersound @ Mar 19 2016, 02:30 PM)
2. same as above, size does not matters, more on how the enclosure being designed. I've DIY a speaker that using 4" driver which using tapped horn design, blind fold a self claim audiophile(that spending rm50k for a pair of midbass + tweeter), let him listen and he thought was a 10" subwoofer playing.
3. only your ears will tell you which is the best listening position, if anyone that can simply comes out a number without knowing your height, your room size, what is in that room, he is basically a dumb that pretend to be an expert.
*
For the speaker size, I was actually referring the small/large size terms used in the AVR setup. Full range (or not full range) speakers, I think. Sorry for that. So the question is really whether full range speakers have a big impact when used for surround. Agree that the physical speaker/enclosure size don't matter when looking at performance rather than the design is more important.

Ya, looking for accurate setup can only be done by actually testing it. I was looking more for a rule-of-thumb/general setup advice based on the experience you guys have on what will or will not work and what matter and does not matters. Otherwise I would not know where to start and what to try. Just like how an experienced wire-man can tell roughly what wire size to use without calculating.

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 19 2016, 05:53 PM)
5.1 vs 7.1 depends so much on the room dimensions. So many people do not take into account about their room dimension and simply just add speakers, then complain that it either sounds worse or has zero improvements. The same reason why stereo can potentially sound as immersive as a 5 channel setup. More doesn't always mean better in audio.

Room is nearly as critical as the choice of speakers IMO.

In a proper room, even a 5.1.2 (or 5.2.2 preferably) setup is more immersive than a 7.1 (or 7.2 prerably) setup. A 5.2.4 setup can actually sound as good as a 7.2.2 setup even. It's all about balance and room conditions.
*
Hold on, you almost lost me with all the 3rd .number. Had to google those ceiling speakers, but I got your point.

Anyway I have my system setup in my living room, about 4.3m width x 5.9m x 3m high plaster ceiling. On my right-top half is solid brick/cement wall and the right-bottom half is open and connects to the dinning room. My listening position is in the center so I have about 3m of space behind me.

Not much in terms of furniture, bare walls and 3+2 sofa distributed on the left and right.

Thanks for all your feedback.

So I guess I'll just stick with 5.0 for now, only thing left to figure out is the surround speaker position.
sonerin
post Mar 20 2016, 06:12 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 20 2016, 01:49 AM)
Actually I'm not using a subwoofer, so it is really a 5.0 system, right? So far I'm happy with the loudness. I feel that my floor stand works pretty well. Casual listening is at -35db and if I blast it it will be at -25db. YPAO did add 2.5/1.5db to my surround.

Though I did notice that if placed closer, the sound is more distinct and easier to pin point. Not sure if that is a good or bad attribute.

Currently the sound coming from surround sound pretty neutral, as in evenly distributed, so it does not sound overly discrete.
But seriously, how many title comes out in a year that is worth watching where surround matters.
The rest of the time is either mostly listening to music daily or watching TV.
Thanks for having me.
When you say put to the side or rear do you mean physically, change channel (from surround to surround back) or both?

If you just shift the speakers for the surround channel further back, will YPAO/DSP know about it and makes adjustments accordingly? I don't want sound that is meant for the side to come out from the rear because it was placed too further back.
For the speaker size, I was actually referring the small/large size terms used in the AVR setup. Full range (or not full range) speakers, I think. Sorry for that. So the question is really whether full range speakers have a big impact when used for surround. Agree that the physical speaker/enclosure size don't matter when looking at performance rather than the design is more important.

Ya, looking for accurate setup can only be done by actually testing it. I was looking more for a rule-of-thumb/general setup advice based on the experience you guys have on what will or will not work and what matter and does not matters. Otherwise I would not know where to start and what to try. Just like how an experienced wire-man can tell roughly what wire size to use without calculating.
Hold on, you almost lost me with all the 3rd .number. Had to google those ceiling speakers, but I got your point.

Anyway I have my system setup in my living room, about 4.3m width x 5.9m x 3m high plaster ceiling. On my right-top half is solid brick/cement wall and the right-bottom half is open and connects to the dinning room. My listening position is in the center so I have about 3m of space behind me.

Not much in terms of furniture, bare walls and 3+2 sofa distributed on the left and right.

Thanks for all your feedback.

So I guess I'll just stick with 5.0 for now, only thing left to figure out is the surround speaker position.
*
Is good to have it close for surround as you mention is easier to pinpoint. You should hear the movement of sound like in actually know the direction. Speaker near ear level is most ideal.
SUSsupersound
post Mar 20 2016, 10:09 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 20 2016, 01:49 AM)
For the speaker size, I was actually referring the small/large size terms used in the AVR setup. Full range (or not full range) speakers, I think. Sorry for that. So the question is really whether full range speakers have a big impact when used for surround. Agree that the physical speaker/enclosure size don't matter when looking at performance rather than the design is more important.

Ya, looking for accurate setup can only be done by actually testing it. I was looking more for a rule-of-thumb/general setup advice based on the experience you guys have on what will or will not work and what matter and does not matters. Otherwise I would not know where to start and what to try. Just like how an experienced wire-man can tell roughly what wire size to use without calculating.
Hold on, you almost lost me with all the 3rd .number. Had to google those ceiling speakers, but I got your point.

Anyway I have my system setup in my living room, about 4.3m width x 5.9m x 3m high plaster ceiling. On my right-
*
Well, fullrange are good, but as said, quality of the speaker comes first. I'm using fullrange now, but still lack of something, is because of like I said before, that fullrange cannot really reveal all the instruments, same brand but lower end model. Even its high end 4" sound better.
Trust me, the "general" rule of thumb are too general to begin with. As listening pleasure are subjective taste, unlike laying 13A plug point wiring are objective.
SSJBen
post Mar 20 2016, 01:44 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Surrounds shouldn't actually sound discrete, it shouldn't stand out more than your LCR unless the mix calls for it. But in most situations, the surrounds are there to provide an extension of the soundstage made by the mains, but NOT actually creating a soundstage of its own.

Don't fall into the same mistake where many new 5, 7 or however many channels owners do: raise the surround levels higher than the mains just because they thought they spent money on them and they should hear them as discrete sources. Then they come back and complain the whole soundstage sounds uncohesive and the whole fronts sound smeared or muffled.

This applies for games too btw, even competitive FPS ones. It doesn't mean hearing someone behind you louder is better, you then just lose details of those at the side or infront of you.
sonerin
post Mar 20 2016, 02:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 20 2016, 01:44 PM)
Surrounds shouldn't actually sound discrete, it shouldn't stand out more than your LCR unless the mix calls for it. But in most situations, the surrounds are there to provide an extension of the soundstage made by the mains, but NOT actually creating a soundstage of its own.

Don't fall into the same mistake where many new 5, 7 or however many channels owners do: raise the surround levels higher than the mains just because they thought they spent money on them and they should hear them as discrete sources. Then they come back and complain the whole soundstage sounds uncohesive and the whole fronts sound smeared or muffled.

This applies for games too btw, even competitive FPS ones. It doesn't mean hearing someone behind you louder is better, you then just lose details of those at the side or infront of you.
*
+1
teop
post Mar 21 2016, 01:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 20 2016, 01:44 PM)
Surrounds shouldn't actually sound discrete, it shouldn't stand out more than your LCR unless the mix calls for it. But in most situations, the surrounds are there to provide an extension of the soundstage made by the mains, but NOT actually creating a soundstage of its own.

Don't fall into the same mistake where many new 5, 7 or however many channels owners do: raise the surround levels higher than the mains just because they thought they spent money on them and they should hear them as discrete sources. Then they come back and complain the whole soundstage sounds uncohesive and the whole fronts sound smeared or muffled.

This applies for games too btw, even competitive FPS ones. It doesn't mean hearing someone behind you louder is better, you then just lose details of those at the side or infront of you.
*
I think I understand what you are trying to say. When I'm listening to music, setting to straight decode will result in distinct separation between the LR channels leaving a hole in the middle. If set to 2 ch Stereo the LR channels blends smoothly.

Now the burning question is the positioning of the LR surround. The thing is it is kind of difficult to know if I'm putting it to far back. The front is easier to judge since you have visual queues. I remember that when I bought the Creative Live! sound card, it came with a demo with various sound circling your head together with a visual positioning of the sound. Unfortunately no such thing here. Its kind of like trying to tell a color-blind person the color of red. If I haven't heard it before, how do I know if it is right or wrong unless of course it is totally screwed. It would requires watching numerous titles with the right scenes with the right effect, which I don't have for now.

Any pointers there? Any suitable demo that I can download. Also does YPAO takes position into account? I think it would be impossible since it only takes single point reading so it can only figure out the distance.
SSJBen
post Mar 21 2016, 02:49 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(teop @ Mar 21 2016, 01:01 PM)
I think I understand what you are trying to say. When I'm listening to music, setting to straight decode will result in distinct separation between the LR channels leaving a hole in the middle. If set to 2 ch Stereo the LR channels blends smoothly.

Now the burning question is the positioning of the LR surround. The thing is it is kind of difficult to know if I'm putting it to far back. The front is easier to judge since you have visual queues. I remember that when I bought the Creative Live! sound card, it came with a demo with various sound circling your head together with a visual positioning of the sound. Unfortunately no such thing here. Its kind of like trying to tell a color-blind person the color of red. If I haven't heard it before, how do I know if it is right or wrong unless of course it is totally screwed. It would requires watching numerous titles with the right scenes with the right effect, which I don't have for now.

Any pointers there? Any suitable demo that I can download. Also does YPAO takes position into account? I think it would be impossible since it only takes single point reading so it can only figure out the distance.
*
How far your surrounds are depends entirely on the type of speaker and your room conditions. Typically it should be near equidistant to your front LR, but that's just a very general rule. Plenty of surround setup articles around the net that further explain how to place your speakers, check them out.

You don't need that faux audio demo by Creative because that will give you a wrong perception of the appropriate SPL and delay (distance). There is a pink noise test tone in the v679, use that instead.

The whole reason for YPAO is to take positioning of the speakers, room acoustics and seating position into account. Otherwise there's zero reason for YPAO to exist nor any other auto-PEQ calibrator to continue business.

Yes one point measurement will be inaccurate if your listening area is awkward or your room acoustics is poor.

ktek
post Mar 21 2016, 02:52 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 21 2016, 01:01 PM)
I think I understand what you are trying to say. When I'm listening to music, setting to straight decode will result in distinct separation between the LR channels leaving a hole in the middle. If set to 2 ch Stereo the LR channels blends smoothly.

Now the burning question is the positioning of the LR surround. The thing is it is kind of difficult to know if I'm putting it to far back. The front is easier to judge since you have visual queues. I remember that when I bought the Creative Live! sound card, it came with a demo with various sound circling your head together with a visual positioning of the sound. Unfortunately no such thing here. Its kind of like trying to tell a color-blind person the color of red. If I haven't heard it before, how do I know if it is right or wrong unless of course it is totally screwed. It would requires watching numerous titles with the right scenes with the right effect, which I don't have for now.

Any pointers there? Any suitable demo that I can download. Also does YPAO takes position into account? I think it would be impossible since it only takes single point reading so it can only figure out the distance.
*
before i forget, always use surround LR in 5.1 no matter u install beside or behind (can do that)
the surround back LR only activate in 7.1

try to make an equal length triangle between primary seat, left & right spkr.
they shouldn't make a hole in middle unless spkr too far away or toe in (angled inside) too much. usually i let spk face front without toe if no big object /wall beside.
run a quick ypao to get latest distance & db.
the ideal ypao is minimal difference for front channel level & distance

after u settle front, change to all ch stereo, play a normal voice song.
reduce front LR spk level db to minimum but remember ori value
now turn urself backward, move urself in horizontal line while listen which position has the most balance surround left vs right.
if u are standing near surround left spkr, increase its db 1 or 2.
so the balance position shift to center.
if near surround right, do the same. or reduce the boost u added just now.

once again the rear middle hole will be fill with voice.
restore front ori db as before. use test tone in yamaha manual spk setup to balance out front vs rear using ear or spl meter /phone app.

demo got a lot ah. see demo-world.eu under 2d trailer hd section.
dolby, dts & thx made are good to begin with

This post has been edited by ktek: Mar 21 2016, 03:23 PM
SSJBen
post Mar 21 2016, 04:03 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


About toe in, it also depends on the drivers. Some drivers like for example KEF's uni-q has a very wide dispersion area so it's generally best not to toe in more than 10 degrees. But there are drivers like bass reflex ones which benefits a lot from toe in even if there are no nearby side walls.
teop
post Mar 22 2016, 12:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 21 2016, 02:49 PM)
How far your surrounds are depends entirely on the type of speaker and your room conditions. Typically it should be near equidistant to your front LR, but that's just a very general rule. Plenty of surround setup articles around the net that further explain how to place your speakers, check them out.

You don't need that faux audio demo by Creative because that will give you a wrong perception of the appropriate SPL and delay (distance). There is a pink noise test tone in the v679, use that instead.

The whole reason for YPAO is to take positioning of the speakers, room acoustics and seating position into account. Otherwise there's zero reason for YPAO to exist nor any other auto-PEQ calibrator to continue business.

Yes one point measurement will be inaccurate if your listening area is awkward or your room acoustics is poor.
*
Last night I tried re-positioning my surround from the back to the sides. It sounded pretty terrible as I become too aware of the sounds coming from the sides. Also the back area seem to be void of sound. Probably because I have a large back space and putting the surround to the sides also reduces/imbalance reflection from the walls since my right-side is an open area for the left surround. Putting the surround to the back and pointing towards the listening position works much better providing a wider 360 experience. Although it is about 40-45 degrees behind, it sounds more like 20 degrees.

I have never used the test tone before. Can you tell me what to listen for? As in if the sound is coming from the left or the back what should I be expecting? I would imagine that when the tone is output from all channels that the tone should be balanced in the center. As for individual tone, I have no idea.

This post has been edited by teop: Mar 22 2016, 12:52 PM
teop
post Mar 22 2016, 12:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 21 2016, 02:52 PM)
before i forget, always use surround LR in 5.1 no matter u install beside or behind (can do that)
the surround back LR only activate in 7.1

try to make an equal length triangle between primary seat, left & right spkr.
they shouldn't make a hole in middle unless spkr too far away or toe in (angled inside) too much. usually i let spk face front without toe if no big object /wall beside.
run a quick ypao to get latest distance & db.
the ideal ypao is minimal difference for front channel level & distance

after u settle front, change to all ch stereo, play a normal voice song.
reduce front LR spk level db to minimum but remember ori value
now turn urself backward, move urself in horizontal line while listen which position has the most balance surround left vs right.
if u are standing near surround left spkr, increase its db 1 or 2.
so the balance position shift to center.
if near surround right, do the same. or reduce the boost u added just now.

once again the rear middle hole will be fill with voice.
restore front ori db as before. use test tone in yamaha manual spk setup to balance out front vs rear using ear or spl meter /phone app.

demo got a lot ah. see demo-world.eu under 2d trailer hd section.
dolby, dts & thx made are good to begin with
*
Thanks for the tips. I'll be sure to try it.

My LR speakers is actually toe in from the start as recommended by the speakers manual, although the degree of toe is not mentioned. Currently it is pointing directly to the sides of my ears. How would I know if I'm toeing too much or too little? What do I listen for?

Currently my front and surround distance is pretty equal and balanced. Based on my previous memory, listening to music with all speakers on produces a 360 effect. And when moving around the room, the sound is pretty balanced until I'm really close to one of the speaker before it becomes obvious to its sound output.
ktek
post Mar 22 2016, 02:49 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(teop @ Mar 22 2016, 12:45 PM)
Thanks for the tips. I'll be sure to try it.
My LR speakers is actually toe in from the start as recommended by the speakers manual, although the degree of toe is not mentioned. Currently it is pointing directly to the sides of my ears. How would I know if I'm toeing too much or too little? What do I listen for?
Currently my front and surround distance is pretty equal and balanced. Based on my previous memory, listening to music with all speakers on produces a 360 effect. And when moving around the room, the sound is pretty balanced until I'm really close to one of the speaker before it becomes obvious to its sound output.
*
any movement must run ypao or manual adjust distance.
u move rear to side the original distance compensation is a lot, causing funny problem of coverage & loud like u experienced.

well, as you mentioned front spk sound like missing hole during straight /pure direct. can u tell what spk model & ypao level, distance?
the room size is simlar to mine, using wide wall 6x4m.

i suspect is not toe angle, but distance far apart between front L & R. the triangle projected behind seat instead. try stand that area to listen in straight /direct mode
Attached Image

This post has been edited by ktek: Mar 22 2016, 03:38 PM
ktek
post Mar 22 2016, 05:38 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
anyway, i suggest you tackle front side first, as the rear tuning has relation with it.
unless you have decide to not change, then just adjust rear spkrs
sonerin
post Mar 22 2016, 06:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Take measuring tape, those use for house renovation. Than seat at your position and move the measuring tape 360 around to get the distance. At least you know what ever position you have is correct
SSJBen
post Mar 22 2016, 07:00 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(teop @ Mar 22 2016, 12:22 PM)
Last night I tried re-positioning my surround from the back to the sides. It sounded pretty terrible as I become too aware of the sounds coming from the sides. Also the back area seem to be void of sound. Probably because I have a large back space and putting the surround to the sides also reduces/imbalance reflection from the walls since my right-side is an open area for the left surround. Putting the surround to the back and pointing towards the listening position works much better providing a wider 360 experience. Although it is about 40-45 degrees behind, it sounds more like 20 degrees.

I have never used the test tone before. Can you tell me what to listen for? As in if the sound is coming from the left or the back what should I be expecting? I would imagine that when the tone is output from all channels that the tone should be balanced in the center. As for individual tone, I have no idea.
*
Directly to the sides? It usually does sound bad because this position is usually too distinctive (this is also why you have a hole on the back). Poor tweeter design will also make everything sound very artificial and harsh. Direct side positions should only be used for dipole/bipole speakers and even then they need to be about 3ft at least higher than the MLP.

The idea surround location for monopole (which are satellites or bookshelves) is about 2ft. behind (or more, depending on the size of the room of course), 20-30 degrees angled. Alternatively, you can just place the surround speakers directly at the back.

For reference, this is my secondary bedroom setup:

Attached Image


So you see, even with a bed right next to my couch, I managed to have a cohesive soundstage just with some logical adjustments despite the setup not being "correct" or "optimized".
My LR speakers on this may look more toed-in than it seems, but it's just the angle of the picture btw.
sonerin
post Mar 22 2016, 09:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 22 2016, 07:00 PM)
Directly to the sides? It usually does sound bad because this position is usually too distinctive (this is also why you have a hole on the back). Poor tweeter design will also make everything sound very artificial and harsh. Direct side positions should only be used for dipole/bipole speakers and even then they need to be about 3ft at least higher than the MLP.

The idea surround location for monopole (which are satellites or bookshelves) is about 2ft. behind (or more, depending on the size of the room of course), 20-30 degrees angled. Alternatively, you can just place the surround speakers directly at the back.

For reference, this is my secondary bedroom setup:

Attached Image
So you see, even with a bed right next to my couch, I managed to have a cohesive soundstage just with some logical  adjustments despite the setup not being "correct" or "optimized".
My LR speakers on this may look more toed-in than it seems, but it's just the angle of the picture btw.
*
Svs satellite ?
SSJBen
post Mar 22 2016, 10:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Yup, SVS Sats + SB1000. Pretty much perfect match for my 2nd bedroom.
stevenycs
post Mar 22 2016, 11:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 19 2016, 02:12 PM)
congrats bro. welcome to.yamaha
*
thanks bro. Just hooked up my Onkyo speakers to it.
can recommend where to get reasonable price for cables?
need longer cables as need to relocate my speakers biggrin.gif
sonerin
post Mar 23 2016, 06:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(stevenycs @ Mar 22 2016, 11:03 PM)
thanks bro. Just hooked up my Onkyo speakers to it.
can recommend where to get reasonable price for cables?
need longer cables as need to relocate my speakers  biggrin.gif
*
Any DIY shop or even hyper markets
sonerin
post Mar 23 2016, 06:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 22 2016, 10:23 PM)
Yup, SVS Sats + SB1000. Pretty much perfect match for my 2nd bedroom.
*
What you using for main system ?
bad2928
post Mar 23 2016, 12:11 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 23 2016, 06:54 AM)
What you using for main system ?
*
must be scary setup with multiple monster sub and mini dsp drool.gif

This post has been edited by bad2928: Mar 23 2016, 12:18 PM
SSJBen
post Mar 23 2016, 12:29 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 23 2016, 06:54 AM)
What you using for main system ?
*
Used to be a A2040 with KEF Q series setup (4xQ100 + Q200 + SVS PB1000). Now dismantled already as I'm in the process of planning to build a proper room for HT usage. Maybe much later in the year before I can complete the plans and what not.

Also looking to add another pair of prime sats as height/overhead speakers into my current 2nd room setup to do 5.2.2. But first need to try and mate both the SB and PB1000. Finding space for the latter is difficult lol.

QUOTE(bad2928 @ Mar 23 2016, 12:11 PM)
must be scary setup with multiple monster sub and mini dsp drool.gif
*
Not scary la, dismantled liao. Heck it was a modest KEF Q series setup only. tongue.gif
stevenycs
post Mar 23 2016, 12:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 23 2016, 06:53 AM)
Any DIY shop or even hyper markets
*
But I'm not using those RCA type.
My connector at the back are screw in wire type n
Can use RCA direct plug?
SSJBen
post Mar 23 2016, 01:17 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(stevenycs @ Mar 23 2016, 12:49 PM)
But I'm not using those RCA type.
My connector at the back are screw in wire type n
Can use RCA direct plug?
*
No, you cannot use RCA pins into a 5 way binding posts. You need banana plugs, spade lugs or just bare wire screw in.

You can get speaker wire in many places, they're really just copper strands inside. The important thing is that you make sure it is oxygen free and the length you are going for is appropriate for the cable's gauge.

I still have a remaining roll of oxygen british cables (about 18 meters left) if you want, can sell to you cheap cheap.
ktek
post Mar 23 2016, 01:25 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(stevenycs @ Mar 23 2016, 12:49 PM)
But I'm not using those RCA type.
My connector at the back are screw in wire type n
Can use RCA direct plug?
*
oh, loose cut spk cable can buy from car audio shop. usually start from rm5 per meter onwards, aim for more copper strands 铜丝 if budget allow.

recently i bought norstone 1.5mmsq from hifi shop was charged rm10 per meter. sound not nice so avoid this.
stevenycs
post Mar 23 2016, 03:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 23 2016, 01:25 PM)
oh, loose cut spk cable can buy from car audio shop. usually start from rm5 per meter onwards, aim for more copper strands 铜丝 if budget allow.

recently i bought norstone 1.5mmsq from hifi shop was charged rm10 per meter. sound not nice so avoid this.
*
Ok cause I tried looking online but can't find.
Thanks
silentsunami
post Mar 23 2016, 03:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


Can try acoustique systems in amcorp mall, price reasonable
sonerin
post Mar 23 2016, 03:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 23 2016, 12:29 PM)
Used to be a A2040 with KEF Q series setup (4xQ100 + Q200 + SVS PB1000). Now dismantled already as I'm in the process of planning to build a proper room for HT usage. Maybe much later in the year before I can complete the plans and what not.

Also looking to add another pair of prime sats as height/overhead speakers into my current 2nd room setup to do 5.2.2. But first need to try and mate both the SB and PB1000. Finding space for the latter is difficult lol.
Not scary la, dismantled liao. Heck it was a modest KEF Q series setup only. tongue.gif
*
KEF.......ah. I use to have KEF but sold it off. It is a good speaker but I jump ship into SVS prime bookshelf. I am using the bookshelf as surround. I did thought of the satellite but kind of small so go with prime bookshelf. I assume you using the A2040 for the room setup.

ktek
post Mar 23 2016, 04:39 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 23 2016, 03:35 PM)
KEF.......ah. I use to have KEF but sold it off. It is a good speaker but I jump ship into SVS prime bookshelf. I am using the bookshelf as surround. I did thought of the satellite but kind of small so go with prime bookshelf. I assume you using the A2040 for the room setup.
*
is RXA850 aventage
btw, i would like the q100 if he planning to sell

This post has been edited by ktek: Mar 23 2016, 05:23 PM
SSJBen
post Mar 23 2016, 06:43 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 23 2016, 03:35 PM)
KEF.......ah. I use to have KEF but sold it off. It is a good speaker but I jump ship into SVS prime bookshelf. I am using the bookshelf as surround. I did thought of the satellite but kind of small so go with prime bookshelf. I assume you using the A2040 for the room setup.
*
QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 23 2016, 04:39 PM)
is RXA850 aventage
btw, i would like the q100 if he planning to sell
*
Ktek bro is right. I bought an A850 for the bedroom. Selling off the A2040 to get this year's A3060 (or something else, will see how first). May seem weird why didn't I just use the 2040 for the room instead, but I got the A850 for a very good price and selling off the 2040 gave me some extra funds to get some other stuff for the time being since I'm not exactly sure when I'll be completing the HT room.

Yeah I mean, I love KEF and their uni-q drivers but... I don't know, they have this very nice wide and enticing soundstage. But the mids always sounded a little constrained to me, it doesn't have enough energy when transitioning into the high frequency ranges, as a result it can sometimes be a little 'boxy'.

My target is the Ultra bookshelves + ultra center + prime sats as surrounds + dual PB2000 or PC2000. Still need more evaluation on the subs part. PC vs PB, dang.

@ktek
Sold both pairs liao. Only left the Q200c now, pending the buyer.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Mar 23 2016, 06:44 PM
sonerin
post Mar 23 2016, 09:47 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 23 2016, 06:43 PM)
Ktek bro is right. I bought an A850 for the bedroom. Selling off the A2040 to get this year's A3060 (or something else, will see how first). May seem weird why didn't I just use the 2040 for the room instead, but I got the A850 for a very good price and selling off the 2040 gave me some extra funds to get some other stuff for the time being since I'm not exactly sure when I'll be completing the HT room.

Yeah I mean, I love KEF and their uni-q drivers but... I don't know, they have this very nice wide and enticing soundstage. But the mids always sounded a little constrained to me, it doesn't have enough energy when transitioning into the high frequency ranges, as a result it can sometimes be a little 'boxy'.

My target is the Ultra bookshelves + ultra center + prime sats as surrounds + dual PB2000 or PC2000. Still need more evaluation on the subs part. PC vs PB, dang.

@ktek
Sold both pairs liao. Only left the Q200c now, pending the buyer.
*
Didn't know that there is A3060 incoming. SVS is definitely very nice HT.
Kelv
post Mar 23 2016, 10:00 PM

Be kind to animals
*******
Senior Member
3,988 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 22 2016, 07:00 PM)
Directly to the sides? It usually does sound bad because this position is usually too distinctive (this is also why you have a hole on the back). Poor tweeter design will also make everything sound very artificial and harsh. Direct side positions should only be used for dipole/bipole speakers and even then they need to be about 3ft at least higher than the MLP.

The idea surround location for monopole (which are satellites or bookshelves) is about 2ft. behind (or more, depending on the size of the room of course), 20-30 degrees angled. Alternatively, you can just place the surround speakers directly at the back.

For reference, this is my secondary bedroom setup:

Attached Image
So you see, even with a bed right next to my couch, I managed to have a cohesive soundstage just with some logical  adjustments despite the setup not being "correct" or "optimized".
My LR speakers on this may look more toed-in than it seems, but it's just the angle of the picture btw.
*
What's the height of the speaker stand? How much is that 5.1 setup?
SSJBen
post Mar 23 2016, 10:02 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Well, 3060 is just my expectation. Past few years, Yamaha announce their receiver line up around June. So just expecting their flagship will be called 3060 this year. Kinda stupid of them if they decide to change name again.

SVS is great. Only gripe I have about the satellites is that they are not energetic enough at the top end, not enough bite. Obviously they don't go very low either, but that's what the sub is for and boy the puny looking Sb1000 beats louder than its size suggests.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Mar 23 2016, 10:26 PM
SSJBen
post Mar 23 2016, 10:25 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Kelv @ Mar 23 2016, 10:00 PM)
What's the height of the speaker stand? How much is that 5.1 setup?
*
30" Sanus NF stands. Its real height is actually 28" though.

Total cost of the setup is around 7.9k.

sonerin
post Mar 24 2016, 06:55 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 23 2016, 10:02 PM)
Well, 3060 is just my expectation. Past few years, Yamaha announce their receiver line up around June. So just expecting their flagship will be called 3060 this year. Kinda stupid of them if they decide to change name again.

SVS is great. Only gripe I have about the satellites is that they are not energetic enough at the top end, not enough bite. Obviously they don't go very low either, but that's what the sub is for and boy the puny looking Sb1000 beats louder than its size suggests.
*
I see. Don't think Yamaha will come out anything new for now. Is true sat has limitation. Bookshelf will nicer that is why choose the prime instead to have fuller sound for the surround. SVS sub totally no doubt about it
Kelv
post Mar 24 2016, 10:27 AM

Be kind to animals
*******
Senior Member
3,988 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 23 2016, 10:25 PM)
30" Sanus NF stands. Its real height is actually 28" though.

Total cost of the setup is around 7.9k.
*
Where you bought the SANUS stand?
SSJBen
post Mar 24 2016, 01:06 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 24 2016, 06:55 AM)
I see. Don't think Yamaha will come out anything new for now. Is true sat has limitation. Bookshelf will nicer that is why choose the prime instead to have fuller sound for the surround. SVS sub totally no doubt about it
*
99% certain Yamaha will announce all their 2016 models in June or the latest July.

Not sure what I want to do yet, maybe spring for the ultra bookshelves + ultra center or prime tower + ultra center. The sats are perfect for surrounds because of their imaging, I kidd you not its imaging is as good if not even better than the Prime Tower.


QUOTE(Kelv @ Mar 24 2016, 10:27 AM)
Where you bought the SANUS stand?
*
Lazada.

sonerin
post Mar 24 2016, 02:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 24 2016, 01:06 PM)
99% certain Yamaha will announce all their 2016 models in June or the latest July.

Not sure what I want to do yet, maybe spring for the ultra bookshelves + ultra center or prime tower + ultra center. The sats are perfect for surrounds because of their imaging, I kidd you not its imaging is as good if not even better than the Prime Tower. 
Lazada.
*
I will always prefer the tower speaker
SSJBen
post Mar 24 2016, 04:32 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 24 2016, 02:38 PM)
I will always prefer the tower speaker
*
That's what I thought. I've heard both the Prime Towers and Ultra Bookshelf.

Prime Towers + Prime Center + Prime Sats setup is at Actcessory SS14.
Ultra Bookshelf + Ultra Center + Prime Sats at a friend's place.

Granted, the listening conditions were different (size of room also different), different subs setup. But tonality wise, I prefer the Ultra Bookshelf. It was more resolving, has more energetic and sparkle in the trebles, there was also that mid-bass that I crave: punchy and impactful, with tactile response.

The Prime Tower couldn't achieve the same response, it does have more low end impact but everything else... it's just one step behind the UB.
Of course, I couldn't compare pure dynamics nor could I do a 1-to-1 comparison in the detail retrieval. That's the only reason why I'm pondering between either of them.

Ringgit getting better now, so hopefully prices start to come down to more sane levels, will hope for some decent deals in KLIAV 16'.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Mar 24 2016, 04:34 PM
sonerin
post Mar 24 2016, 04:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Ultra is still the top of SVS so I will think it will be better than prime.
silentsunami
post Mar 24 2016, 10:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 23 2016, 10:25 PM)
30" Sanus NF stands. Its real height is actually 28" though.

Total cost of the setup is around 7.9k.
*
From the picture, the height looks perfect. Mind to share how much u bought the speaker stand?
SSJBen
post Mar 25 2016, 12:42 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(silentsunami @ Mar 24 2016, 10:25 PM)
From the picture,  the height looks perfect.  Mind to share how much u bought the speaker stand?
*
http://www.lazada.com.my/sanus-nf30-natura...ch-2084745.html

RM305 now.
When I bought it, it was RM298 or something. Obviously I used the Lazada discounts so at the end it's only like RM550+ or something for 2 pairs.

Yes the height is perfect for my sitting position, tweeters are just half an inch higher than my ears which is just nice. It technically could be perfectly in line to my ear height, but I added those "earthquake prevention" pads from Daiso under the speakers which added half an inch of height. No biggie.

Amazing pads though, they're sticky with no residue so I don't have to use blu-tack to prevent my speakers from failling over if someone bumps into them and yet they really did stop the slight resonance between the top plate and the speakers.

This are the ones - http://www.cooltoyzph.com/viewitem.php?iid=12
Though I'm only using the blue ones.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Mar 25 2016, 12:57 AM
sonerin
post Mar 25 2016, 06:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 25 2016, 12:42 AM)
http://www.lazada.com.my/sanus-nf30-natura...ch-2084745.html

RM305 now.
When I bought it, it was RM298 or something. Obviously I used the Lazada discounts so at the end it's only like RM550+ or something for 2 pairs.

Yes the height is perfect for my sitting position, tweeters are just half an inch higher than my ears which is just nice. It technically could be perfectly in line to my ear height, but I added those "earthquake prevention" pads from Daiso under the speakers which added half an inch of height. No biggie.

Amazing pads though, they're sticky with no residue so I don't have to use blu-tack to prevent my speakers from failling over if someone bumps into them and yet they really did stop the slight resonance between the top plate and the speakers.

This are the ones - http://www.cooltoyzph.com/viewitem.php?iid=12
Though I'm only using the blue ones.
*
I tried to find the pad in daiso but cannot find it
silentsunami
post Mar 25 2016, 10:28 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 25 2016, 12:42 AM)
http://www.lazada.com.my/sanus-nf30-natura...ch-2084745.html

RM305 now.
When I bought it, it was RM298 or something. Obviously I used the Lazada discounts so at the end it's only like RM550+ or something for 2 pairs.

Yes the height is perfect for my sitting position, tweeters are just half an inch higher than my ears which is just nice. It technically could be perfectly in line to my ear height, but I added those "earthquake prevention" pads from Daiso under the speakers which added half an inch of height. No biggie.

Amazing pads though, they're sticky with no residue so I don't have to use blu-tack to prevent my speakers from failling over if someone bumps into them and yet they really did stop the slight resonance between the top plate and the speakers.

This are the ones - http://www.cooltoyzph.com/viewitem.php?iid=12
Though I'm only using the blue ones.
*
Thanks Mate, i'm gonna order the stand rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
teop
post Mar 26 2016, 01:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 22 2016, 02:49 PM)
any movement must run ypao or manual adjust distance.
u move rear to side the original distance compensation is a lot, causing funny problem of coverage & loud like u experienced.

well, as you mentioned front spk sound like missing hole during straight /pure direct. can u tell what spk model & ypao level, distance?
the room size is simlar to mine, using wide wall 6x4m.

i suspect is not toe angle, but distance far apart between front L & R. the triangle projected behind seat instead. try stand that area to listen in straight /direct mode
Attached Image
*
QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 22 2016, 06:10 PM)
Take measuring tape, those use for house renovation. Than seat at your position and move the measuring tape 360 around to get the distance. At least you know what ever position you have is correct
*
Ya, I did run YPAO everytime adjustments are made. But in this case YPAO failed to help.

I'm pretty impressed with YPAO as the measurements are spot on. It was YPAO that initially made me realize that my surround will not be at equal distance!! (I mis-calculated on the floor tiles).

My fronts are at FL 2.6m (0db), C 2.45m (-3.5db), FR 2.6m (0db), SL 2.65 (2.0db), SR 2.2m (1.5db) from listening position. My FLR is 2.0m apart.

With some of the surround test videos from demo.world.eu, I was able to adjust and confirm that my speakers are in proper position. Much easier than watching movies.

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 22 2016, 07:00 PM)
Directly to the sides? It usually does sound bad because this position is usually too distinctive (this is also why you have a hole on the back). Poor tweeter design will also make everything sound very artificial and harsh. Direct side positions should only be used for dipole/bipole speakers and even then they need to be about 3ft at least higher than the MLP.

The idea surround location for monopole (which are satellites or bookshelves) is about 2ft. behind (or more, depending on the size of the room of course), 20-30 degrees angled. Alternatively, you can just place the surround speakers directly at the back.

For reference, this is my secondary bedroom setup:

Attached Image
So you see, even with a bed right next to my couch, I managed to have a cohesive soundstage just with some logical  adjustments despite the setup not being "correct" or "optimized".
My LR speakers on this may look more toed-in than it seems, but it's just the angle of the picture btw.
*
Thanks for the advice and photo of your setup. They explained a lot. At least now I know that it is possible to put speakers that close together.
teop
post Mar 26 2016, 01:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 25 2016, 12:42 AM)
, but I added those "earthquake prevention" pads from Daiso under the speakers which added half an inch of height. No biggie.

Amazing pads though, they're sticky with no residue so I don't have to use blu-tack to prevent my speakers from failling over if someone bumps into them and yet they really did stop the slight resonance between the top plate and the speakers.

This are the ones - http://www.cooltoyzph.com/viewitem.php?iid=12
Though I'm only using the blue ones.
*
I saw those sticky pads and knew what it would be good for even before I bought my HT setup. Because they are quite thick and soft, it can easily balance uneven floors. Useful stuff.

QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 25 2016, 06:17 AM)
I tried to find the pad in daiso but cannot find it
*
Ya like all other shops with many outlet, each will stock differently. So I end up browsing at every store to see what they have to offer. Daiso at Mahkota Cheras carries it.
SSJBen
post Mar 26 2016, 02:50 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Yes the daiso pads are good. You can even stack 3 or 4 them to make heights and they remain stable (as long as you don't stack like 10 or something ridiculous, it'll be fine).

I bought as many as I could because they can work in many different kind of situations.

Hope you can get your setup right.
My LR speakers are about 6.8ft apart, toe'd in approx 15 degrees. Center channel is exactly in the middle, between the front and rear speakers. It's also exactly on the same horizontal plane as the front LR, despite not being on the same vertical height. This gives me that seamless transistion of sound from front to back, especially more so since I'm using 5 exact same drivers and tweeters.

The surround LR are 4.25ft apart, it's important to make them face exactly forward if you place the surround speakers directly behind you so that it creates this passing-of-the-baton fluidity from the fronts to the rears. This makes it that even with 7.1 sources downmixed into a 5.1 setup, I could hear the back LR effects without losing much.
I see a lot of people who place the rear speakers behind them due to not having space to the sides tend to toe them in to the MLP, this will create 2 gaps (or holes) at the sides. Don't make that mistake.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Mar 26 2016, 02:51 PM
manx
post Mar 30 2016, 08:27 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Hello guys...
I have an Onkyo AV Receiver TX-SR503 (old model) tongue.gif which was operating fine since and suddenly few weeks back I have some decoding problem from it. The receiver is decoding Dolby Digital sound perfectly but somehow it doesn't recognize DTS and only output as Stereo sound. I have tested from few sources (mainly my android boxes) and also from all the 3 available optical inputs but somehow it still fails to produce the DTS output sad.gif.

Do you guys know what exactly the problem or is there any shop recommendation (preferably in Penang) for me to get it checked?
ktek
post Mar 30 2016, 09:24 AM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(manx @ Mar 30 2016, 08:27 AM)
Hello guys...
I have an Onkyo AV Receiver TX-SR503 (old model) tongue.gif which was operating fine since and suddenly few weeks back I have some decoding problem from it. The receiver is decoding Dolby Digital sound perfectly but somehow it doesn't recognize DTS and only output as Stereo sound. I have tested from few sources (mainly my android boxes) and also from all the 3 available optical inputs but somehow it still fails to produce the DTS output sad.gif.

Do you guys know what exactly the problem or is there any shop recommendation (preferably in Penang) for me to get it checked?
*
possible remote select auto surround? or direct mode
full reset may fix this
manx
post Mar 30 2016, 09:29 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 30 2016, 09:24 AM)
possible remote select auto surround? or direct mode
full reset may fix this
*
thanks for suggestion.. will try it out, thanks. thumbup.gif
manx
post Mar 30 2016, 08:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 30 2016, 09:24 AM)
possible remote select auto surround? or direct mode
full reset may fix this
*
QUOTE(manx @ Mar 30 2016, 09:29 AM)
thanks for suggestion.. will try it out, thanks.  thumbup.gif
*
Tried resseting the receiver but still the same. I beleive the hardware codec spoit (just a wild guess actually). Is there any recomended shop that i can bring my receiver for checkup tongue.gif. Appreciate your inputs. Thanks.
bad2928
post Mar 30 2016, 10:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(manx @ Mar 30 2016, 08:51 PM)
Tried resseting the receiver but still the same. I beleive the hardware codec spoit (just a wild guess actually). Is there any recomended shop that i can bring my receiver for checkup tongue.gif. Appreciate your inputs. Thanks.
*
time to upgrade to DTS MA and DOLBY TrueHD tongue.gif
manx
post Mar 31 2016, 06:44 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(bad2928 @ Mar 30 2016, 10:56 PM)
time to upgrade to DTS MA and DOLBY TrueHD tongue.gif
*
Any recomendation?? tongue.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 2 2016, 10:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image lust.gif
tepetlah
post Apr 2 2016, 10:49 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: KK


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Feb 12 2016, 08:24 PM)
user posted image

AV receiver that supports Bluetooth® for wireless music playback, 4K Ultra HD video with HDCP 2.2 compatibility and a discrete 5.1-channel amplifier design. YPAO automatically calibrates your listening environment for optimal sound performance.

Bluetooth® for wireless music streaming with Compressed Music Enhancer
•4K Ultra HD pass-through with HDCP 2.2 support
•YPAO sound optimization for automatic speaker setup
•Virtual CINEMA FRONT provides virtual surround sound with five speakers in front
•Extra Bass setting provides more bass output from smaller speakers
•5.1-channel powerful surround sound
•Newly designed remote control with large buttons for enhanced ease of use

Rating very good for RX V379 but RX V479 model even better. The problem is out of budget!  sad.gif
*
mind to share rx-v479 pricing & where?..thx

Kaka23
post Apr 2 2016, 05:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,259 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 2 2016, 10:22 AM)
user posted image  lust.gif
*
Wow.. 7.1.2?

SSJBen
post Apr 2 2016, 08:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 2 2016, 10:22 AM)
user posted image  lust.gif
*
Pioneer Elite speakers....

They're very decent, but I don't agree with the whole bouncing audio bullshit for atmos. Only people who wants to be hip and waste money buy them, I'll leave it at that.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Apr 2 2016, 08:24 PM
ktek
post Apr 2 2016, 08:48 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
pioneer avr, samsung plasma
sonerin
post Apr 2 2016, 10:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Nice
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 3 2016, 12:42 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(tepetlah @ Apr 2 2016, 10:49 AM)
mind to share rx-v479 pricing & where?..thx
*
No worries bro!

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


The cheapest I think.... brows.gif
SSJBen
post Apr 3 2016, 12:53 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Might as well wait for v481.
At least this year's all Yamaha models fully support 4k60p @ 4:4:4 (v479 only 4:2:0) and more importantly HDR.

v481 is coming out in April (yeah this month).

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Apr 3 2016, 12:54 AM
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 3 2016, 01:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 3 2016, 12:53 AM)
Might as well wait for v481.
At least this year's all Yamaha models fully support 4k60p @ 4:4:4 (v479 only 4:2:0) and more importantly HDR.

v481 is coming out in April (yeah this month).
*
user posted image
YAMAHA RX-V481

•5.1-Channel surround sound
•MusicCast wireless multiroom audio
•Bluetooth® to stream music from your mobile device
•Compressed Music Enhancer and high-resolution audio support for sound clarity
•Wi-Fi, network streaming services
•Download the AV Controller App to control your receiver via your mobile device
•4K Ultra HD pass-through with HDCP 2.2 support
•High dynamic range (HDR) and BT.2020 compatibility
•YPAO™ sound optimization tuning for your home


Any big difference between the 479 and the 481? sad.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 3 2016, 01:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010

SSJBen
post Apr 3 2016, 02:59 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 3 2016, 01:15 AM)
user posted image
YAMAHA RX-V481

•5.1-Channel surround sound
•MusicCast wireless multiroom audio
•Bluetooth® to stream music from your mobile device
•Compressed Music Enhancer and high-resolution audio support for sound clarity
•Wi-Fi, network streaming services
•Download the AV Controller App to control your receiver via your mobile device
•4K Ultra HD pass-through with HDCP 2.2 support
•High dynamic range (HDR) and BT.2020 compatibility
•YPAO™ sound optimization tuning for your home


Any big difference between the 479 and the 481?  sad.gif
*
No, other than what I already mentioned. Components wise, pretty much all the same including the power supply and transformer.
tepetlah
post Apr 5 2016, 11:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: KK


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 2 2016, 08:23 PM)
Pioneer Elite speakers....

They're very decent, but I don't agree with the whole bouncing audio bullshit for atmos. Only people who wants to be hip and waste money buy them, I'll leave it at that.
*
thats y i just getting Used Marantz sr5007 to replace my 8 yrs yamaha rx-v663 biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif ..tested and its huge difference..
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 9 2016, 12:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(tepetlah @ Apr 5 2016, 11:38 PM)
thats y i just getting Used Marantz sr5007 to replace my 8 yrs yamaha rx-v663  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif ..tested and its huge difference..
*
user posted image

Marantz SR5007 7.2ch Networking Home Theater Receiver

DTS HD Master Audio with Audyssey MultEQXT

650W (Standby 0.2W)

6 HDMI outputs

RM 3,856.00 shakehead.gif
ktek
post Apr 9 2016, 02:28 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 9 2016, 12:17 PM)
user posted image

Marantz SR5007 7.2ch Networking Home Theater Receiver
DTS HD Master Audio with Audyssey MultEQXT
650W (Standby 0.2W)
6 HDMI outputs
RM 3,856.00  shakehead.gif
*
value for money if buy used unit below 2k. audyssey xt goooooddd!!
amp has insufficient power to go 7ch, the only weakness from my usage
manx
post Apr 10 2016, 03:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Hi guys,
Is the Onkyo NR646 is a good receiver? If i can get it around rm2k is it a reasonable price?
ccschua
post Apr 10 2016, 04:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
i am planning to put up a low costs satellites for the 7.1 effects.

i wonder if the yamaha sat is cost effective ? my understanding is that for satellites its not so critical (just for effects ??)

http://www.amazon.com/Yamaha-NS-AW150WH-In...tellite+speaker
SSJBen
post Apr 11 2016, 05:29 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(manx @ Apr 10 2016, 03:33 PM)
Hi guys,
Is the Onkyo NR646 is a good receiver? If i can get it around rm2k is it a reasonable price?
*
It's a decent receiver when it works. But when it doesn't, it's the best paperweight in the world.

Pick your poison.


QUOTE(ccschua @ Apr 10 2016, 04:22 PM)
i am planning to put up a low costs satellites for the 7.1 effects.

i wonder if the yamaha sat is cost effective ? my understanding is that for satellites its not so critical (just for effects ??)

http://www.amazon.com/Yamaha-NS-AW150WH-In...tellite+speaker
*
Never heard of those sats.
But generally, if you just want surround effects; yes they work and the cost effective way is to buy cheap satellites.

Surround effects are not as as critical as the LCR and sub indeed, but to me personally I do like decent quality speakers for the surrounds. Why? Because I place soundstage and dynamics as two of the most important criteria in audio, be it in HT, stereo or even headphones.

The point I'm making is, yes many cheap speakers will work just to give you the surround effects. But there's a stark difference if you want those effects to sound huge, dynamic and engaging, all the while with the soundstage sounding even bigger than you'd imagine them to be. Puny drivers cannot give you that kind of dynamics handling, at least not without having a compressed soundstage or sacrificing something else along the chain. Where by then you'd have gaps within the whole listening area as well.
ccschua
post Apr 11 2016, 07:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
I do agree with comments. good speakers will provide the coherence sound and soundstaging.

that is why I have checked the Yamaha and I hope they dont skimp on speakers.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007QTAX6Y/ref=ps...1_t2_B0001VHARE
SSJBen
post Apr 12 2016, 01:43 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ccschua @ Apr 11 2016, 07:15 PM)
I do agree with comments. good speakers will provide the coherence sound and soundstaging.

that is why I have checked the Yamaha and I hope they dont skimp on speakers.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007QTAX6Y/ref=ps...1_t2_B0001VHARE
*
... Except, they do.

Yamaha, like many other companies put their money in their high end products. They care very little about their entry level stuff.

I may be wrong, but just skimming through some opinions on those speakers pretty much confirms my suspicion that they're very subpar products.

If you want cheap, get miccas or something.
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 13 2016, 11:07 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Desa Home Theatre having sale on 14 - 17 April at Community Centre, Damansara Heights, Kuala Lumpur

Massive Warehouse sale up to 70% off!

Time: 11.00a.m to 7.00p.m

Anyone? hmm.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

TSjovigrunge
post Apr 13 2016, 11:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 13 2016, 11:07 AM)
Desa Home Theatre having sale on 14 - 17 April at Community Centre, Damansara Heights, Kuala Lumpur

Massive Warehouse sale up to 70% off!

Time: 11.00a.m to 7.00p.m

Anyone?  hmm.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

TSjovigrunge
post Apr 13 2016, 04:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Pioneer VSX-824K 5.1 channel = RM1399
Yamaha RX-V579 7.2 channel = RM1699
ONKYO TX-NR737 7.2 channel = RM2299

Your pick? hmm.gif
SSJBen
post Apr 13 2016, 04:54 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 13 2016, 04:41 PM)
Pioneer VSX-824K 5.1 channel = RM1399
Yamaha RX-V579 7.2 channel = RM1699
ONKYO TX-NR737 7.2 channel = RM2299

Your pick?  hmm.gif
*
The Onkyo.

Just pray every night before you go to bed that it'll work the next day. innocent.gif
bad2928
post Apr 13 2016, 05:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 13 2016, 04:54 PM)
The Onkyo.

Just pray every night before you go to bed that it'll work the next day.  innocent.gif
*
lol that's so mean,but its true nod.gif

This post has been edited by bad2928: Apr 13 2016, 05:27 PM
sonerin
post Apr 13 2016, 05:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 13 2016, 04:41 PM)
Pioneer VSX-824K 5.1 channel = RM1399
Yamaha RX-V579 7.2 channel = RM1699
ONKYO TX-NR737 7.2 channel = RM2299

Your pick?  hmm.gif
*
Yammy
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 13 2016, 06:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(bad2928 @ Apr 13 2016, 05:27 PM)
lol that's so mean,but its true  nod.gif
*
tongue.gif

Yamaha 579 seems tempting considering it's cheaper than 479 for at least tomorrow till Sunday! brows.gif

















silentsunami
post Apr 14 2016, 10:40 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(silentsunami @ Mar 25 2016, 10:28 AM)
Thanks Mate, i'm gonna order the stand rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
Got the stand but the top base is too small for my speakers and the bottom base dented, in the end need to return to lazada. Anyone can recommend where to get a decent speaker stand?

This post has been edited by silentsunami: Apr 14 2016, 10:55 AM
sonerin
post Apr 14 2016, 11:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(silentsunami @ Apr 14 2016, 10:40 AM)
Got the stand but the top base is too small for my speakers and the bottom base dented, in the end need to return to lazada. Anyone can recommend where to get a decent speaker stand?
*
Amcorp mall
SSJBen
post Apr 14 2016, 03:50 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(silentsunami @ Apr 14 2016, 10:40 AM)
Got the stand but the top base is too small for my speakers and the bottom base dented, in the end need to return to lazada. Anyone can recommend where to get a decent speaker stand?
*
Top plates being small isn't an issue. Many people have their bookshelves on plates 1/3rd the size of the speaker's depth and width.

But if the lower base is damaged, then yeah no choice but to return it. It's wood after all.
Some stores in Amcorp mall sells steel stands (they can even custom make it for you), but they're a lot more expensive than the Sanus wooden stands of course.
silentsunami
post Apr 14 2016, 05:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 14 2016, 03:50 PM)
Top plates being small isn't an issue. Many people have their bookshelves on plates 1/3rd the size of the speaker's depth and width.

But if the lower base is damaged, then yeah no choice but to return it. It's wood after all.
Some stores in Amcorp mall sells steel stands (they can even custom make it for you), but they're a lot more expensive than the Sanus wooden stands of course.
*
I asked before, it will cost around 600++ and the steel one super heavy, might nd to go Amcorp mall again. Btw Malaysia no sell Atacama speakers stand?

Atacama Nexus 6I
Masculine
post Apr 15 2016, 02:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,282 posts

Joined: Jul 2005


Hi,

I'm moving to a new apartment and thinking of upgrading from my iPhone 6/AT MSR7 to AV receiver type of setup.

I'm seriously looking at Yamaha RX-V379 or RX-V479. What is a good Yamaha speaker that should go with this receiver? Mainly for music listening 99% from FLAC file streamed from my iPhone.

Thanks
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 15 2016, 04:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(Masculine @ Apr 15 2016, 02:40 PM)
Hi,

I'm moving to a new apartment and thinking of upgrading from my iPhone 6/AT MSR7 to AV receiver type of setup.

I'm seriously looking at Yamaha RX-V379 or RX-V479.  What is a good Yamaha speaker that should go with this receiver?  Mainly for music listening 99% from FLAC file streamed from my iPhone.

Thanks
*
Budget? hmm.gif
ktek
post Apr 15 2016, 05:04 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(Masculine @ Apr 15 2016, 02:40 PM)
Hi,

I'm moving to a new apartment and thinking of upgrading from my iPhone 6/AT MSR7 to AV receiver type of setup.

I'm seriously looking at Yamaha RX-V379 or RX-V479.  What is a good Yamaha speaker that should go with this receiver?  Mainly for music listening 99% from FLAC file streamed from my iPhone.

Thanks
*
got choice dont buy yamaha entry spkrs. there are tons of bookshelf spkr available. can u mention room size?
SSJBen
post Apr 15 2016, 05:06 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Masculine @ Apr 15 2016, 02:40 PM)
Hi,

I'm moving to a new apartment and thinking of upgrading from my iPhone 6/AT MSR7 to AV receiver type of setup.

I'm seriously looking at Yamaha RX-V379 or RX-V479.  What is a good Yamaha speaker that should go with this receiver?  Mainly for music listening 99% from FLAC file streamed from my iPhone.

Thanks
*
Are you planning to do HT in the future? Otherwise, why waste money on an AV receiver when you can instead get an intergrated stereo amp which provides better audio quality in a stereo format?
Masculine
post Apr 15 2016, 07:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,282 posts

Joined: Jul 2005


Budget would be around rm3k

Room size - not sure the size coz moving in end of this month. But it is a 888 sq ft 2 bedroom condo and I'm planning to put the set up in the living room.

I may go for HT in the future but it's not my priority. I prefer audio quality for music listening first.

I prefer floor standing speaker
SSJBen
post Apr 15 2016, 08:48 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Masculine @ Apr 15 2016, 07:51 PM)
Budget would be around rm3k

Room size - not sure the size coz moving in end of this month.  But it is a 888 sq ft 2 bedroom condo and I'm planning to put the set up in the living room.

I may go for HT in the future but it's not my priority.  I prefer audio quality for music listening first. 

I prefer floor standing speaker
*
Then get an intergrated stereo amp + 2x Sony SSCS3.
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 15 2016, 11:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 15 2016, 08:48 PM)
Then get an intergrated stereo amp + 2x Sony SSCS3.
*
Price?
Masculine
post Apr 16 2016, 06:52 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,282 posts

Joined: Jul 2005


Which one better? Sscs3 or jbl arena 180?
sonerin
post Apr 16 2016, 06:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Masculine @ Apr 16 2016, 06:52 AM)
Which one better? Sscs3 or jbl arena 180?
*
Both about the same
Kelv
post Apr 17 2016, 07:52 AM

Be kind to animals
*******
Senior Member
3,988 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 13 2016, 06:49 PM)
tongue.gif

Yamaha 579 seems tempting considering it's cheaper than 479 for at least tomorrow till Sunday!  brows.gif
*
I notice every year, Yamaha 57x series always cheaper than 47x series during stock clearance.
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 17 2016, 02:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(Kelv @ Apr 17 2016, 07:52 AM)
I notice every year, Yamaha 57x series always cheaper than 47x series during stock clearance.
*
7.2 not much demand due to expensive. dry.gif
feelfree
post Apr 17 2016, 10:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
174 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
Hi, I'm looking to upgrade my old Onkyo AVR to newer model which is able to playback Atmos and DTS:X, has been selected Pioneer SC-LX59 (£1399.00), Marantz SR7010 (£1399.00) and Yamaha RX-A3050 (£1799.00). But I found something that very funny, supposed Pioneer SC-LX59 is same as Elite SC95, but I have no idea why SC95 selling price in US is so much cheaper than LX58, based on the spec, it is almost identical, only the voltage is different! No doubt, Marantz selling price in US is USD2199.00, Yamaha RX-A3050 is USD1999.00 while Pioneer LX58 isn't available in US, so based on the price is Europe and USA, Yamaha should be the most expensive, follow by Marantz and then the Pioneer, but now in Malaysia, Marantz is the most expensive, then Yamaha and Pioneer, so if follow this price list, the most Best Buy AVR should be Yamaha in Malaysia, does anyone of you can give some comment about Yamaha sound?
ccschua
post Apr 17 2016, 10:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
can I know what is the recommended ceiling satellite speaker ? wouldnt it shake the plaster ceiling ?
SSJBen
post Apr 18 2016, 03:44 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Masculine @ Apr 16 2016, 06:52 AM)
Which one better? Sscs3 or jbl arena 180?
*
They're different speakers with different sonic/tonal characteristics. The Sony CS3 is semi-neutral, somewhat towards the warm and laid back side. The JBL Arena 180 is also a semi-neutral speaker, but tends toward the forward side but not in what I'd call bright.

The Arena 180 has higher output in the lower bass regions, while the CS3 is more defined and smoother throughout the entire bass region but has less depth. That said, they both have some cons. The Arena 180's treble will tend to sound a bit harsh and unrefined, while the CS3 can start to sound compressed during certain frequencies.

So there is no which one is better, it's which you prefer. Audio is like food.

Price wise, the Sony is still much cheaper than the JBL. Only advice is go listen to both of them and see which you like better. But understand what you listen in a store is very much different to what you'll hear at home.



QUOTE(feelfree @ Apr 17 2016, 10:23 PM)
Hi, I'm looking to upgrade my old Onkyo AVR to newer model which is able to playback Atmos and DTS:X, has been selected Pioneer SC-LX59 (£1399.00), Marantz SR7010 (£1399.00) and Yamaha RX-A3050 (£1799.00). But I found something that very funny, supposed Pioneer SC-LX59 is same as Elite SC95, but I have no idea why SC95 selling price in US is so much cheaper than LX58, based on the spec, it is almost identical, only the voltage is different! No doubt, Marantz selling price in US is USD2199.00, Yamaha RX-A3050 is USD1999.00 while Pioneer LX58 isn't available in US, so based on the price is Europe and USA, Yamaha should be the most expensive, follow by Marantz and then the Pioneer, but now in Malaysia, Marantz is the most expensive, then Yamaha and Pioneer, so if follow this price list, the most Best Buy AVR should be Yamaha in Malaysia, does anyone of you can give some comment about Yamaha sound?
*
It's nearly May, buying an AVR now or next month isn't such a good time. New models are coming out and like history has told us over the last decade, last year models will be sent to the 'clearance section' soon. So in case the new models will suck even more with smaller power supplies, you can always just buy last year's models which sucked less for a lower price.

Pioneer in US is different to the Pioneer in Europe and also different to the Pioneer in Asia. They're all managed under their own respective regions, what Pioneer Europe does has nothing to do with Pioneer US even if they're still all under the same company at the end of the day.

Yamaha's sound? Mostly neutral, somewhat towards the forward yet airy soundstage. Honestly, people talk about how their amps and DACs can sound so different from one another when the reality is that they aren't really significant. What makes them sound so different is not the hardware, but how the EQ algorithms are calculated and implemented.
Speakers play in a room after all so room shape/dimensions alone can change everything, they aren't headphones which play directly to the ears.


QUOTE(ccschua @ Apr 17 2016, 10:41 PM)
can I know what is the recommended ceiling satellite speaker ? wouldnt it shake the plaster ceiling ?
*
If you're gonna install speakers on plaster, you're better off installing in-ceiling speakers instead of on-ceiling speakers.
OPT
post Apr 18 2016, 03:59 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
I have a Harman Kardon AVR 156 coupled with Jamo S626HCS... bought the HK together with JBL SCS 200.5 but already sold the JBL and bought this Jamo.

The JBL satellite sounded less bodied and hence I tried Jamo (but without a sub). Feels that Jamo is far superior but still no oomph without a sub...

Now seriously thinking of getting a sub sad.gif

Any suggestions?

SSJBen
post Apr 18 2016, 04:05 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 18 2016, 03:59 PM)
I have a Harman Kardon AVR 156 coupled with Jamo S626HCS... bought the HK together with JBL SCS 200.5 but already sold the JBL and bought this Jamo.

The JBL satellite sounded less bodied and hence I tried Jamo (but without a sub). Feels that Jamo is far superior but still no oomph without a sub...

Now seriously thinking of getting a sub  sad.gif

Any suggestions?
*
What's your budget for the sub?

Before anything else, are you sure your settings are properly setup? You're not using subs, so ideally your fronts should be "Large" in your AVR setting. I'm just presuming because if you changed nothing from your JBL SCS200.5 setup before, it could mean that your speaker settings are still set to "Small" with a very high crossover value.
OPT
post Apr 18 2016, 04:10 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 18 2016, 04:05 PM)
What's your budget for the sub?

Before anything else, are you sure your settings are properly setup? You're not using subs, so ideally your fronts should be "Large" in your AVR setting. I'm just presuming because if you changed nothing from your JBL SCS200.5 setup before, it could mean that your speaker settings are still set to "Small" with a very high crossover value.
*
Actually I'm quite noob in this..

Yes, I've read about Large/small setting. I have tried to listen to large/small...not sure in the end which setting I've gone with laugh.gif Most likely it's Large.

By the way, how about the frequencies for the front/middle/surround?

I will check again tonight. Thanks.


SSJBen
post Apr 18 2016, 06:48 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 18 2016, 04:10 PM)
Actually I'm quite noob in this..

Yes, I've read about Large/small setting. I have tried to listen to large/small...not sure in the end which setting I've gone with  laugh.gif Most likely it's Large.

By the way, how about the frequencies for the front/middle/surround?

I will check again tonight. Thanks.
*
It depends. There's no one size fit all crossover freq. for everyone.
There are just too many variables, but the good starting point is 80hz if you have a sub. But since you're using your front towers as the low-end, then you'll need to experiment a bit.

Personally I'd suggest getting a sub would if movies/games are your main content sources. I'm not sure how strong that power supply is in your HK amp, so driving all your speakers full range is not really a good idea in the first place anyways.
OPT
post Apr 18 2016, 07:25 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 18 2016, 06:48 PM)
It depends. There's no one size fit all crossover freq. for everyone.
There are just too many variables, but the good starting point is 80hz if you have a sub. But since you're using your front towers as the low-end, then you'll need to experiment a bit.

Personally I'd suggest getting a sub would if movies/games are your main content sources. I'm not sure how strong that power supply is in your HK amp, so driving all your speakers full range is not really a good idea in the first place anyways.
*
The default was Large and 100Hz. I experimented with Small, 80Hz and Small, 60Hz...I found Small, 60Hz was giving more bass. All these is without subwoofer.

I will try again tonight smile.gif

Update: It's Large and 100Hz now. Mainly into movies, the sub should do good sad.gif

This post has been edited by OPT: Apr 19 2016, 06:05 AM
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 18 2016, 10:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Anyone here have 9 surround speakers? hmm.gif
SSJBen
post Apr 18 2016, 10:59 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 18 2016, 10:32 PM)
Anyone here have 9 surround speakers?  hmm.gif
*
I have;

7.2 + Front Heights = 9 channels.
5.2.4 = 9 channels.
5.2 + Front and Rear Heights = 9 channels.

What about it?
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 18 2016, 11:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 18 2016, 10:59 PM)
I have;

7.2 + Front Heights = 9 channels.
5.2.4 = 9 channels.
5.2 + Front and Rear Heights = 9 channels.

What about it?
*
Wow! Is it possible to get a glimpse of your HT room with some pictures? (if you don't mind!) wub.gif
SSJBen
post Apr 18 2016, 11:37 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 18 2016, 11:27 PM)
Wow! Is it possible to get a glimpse of your HT room with some pictures? (if you don't mind!)  wub.gif
*
I think I worded it wrongly... sweat.gif

What I actually meant was I have at some point listened to all 3 configurations for extensive periods of time. Currently I'm only doing a 5.1 setup in a bedroom.
I'm under the process of planning my HT room, hopefully can start building in the later end of the year.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Apr 18 2016, 11:38 PM
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 19 2016, 12:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 18 2016, 11:37 PM)
I think I worded it wrongly... sweat.gif

What I actually meant was I have at some point listened to all 3 configurations for extensive periods of time. Currently I'm only doing a 5.1 setup in a bedroom.
I'm under the process of planning my HT room, hopefully can start building in the later end of the year.
*
OIC. No worries bro. Just curious about 9 surround speaker effects added with Dolby Atmos. Must be breathtaking!



lust.gif
sonerin
post Apr 19 2016, 06:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
I am currently doing 7.1.4 will take some snapshots in about next week when all speakers are install
SUSchokia
post Apr 19 2016, 08:47 AM

Chartered Member
*******
Senior Member
3,617 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 19 2016, 12:17 AM)
OIC. No worries bro. Just curious about 9 surround speaker effects added with Dolby Atmos. Must be breathtaking!



lust.gif
*
I still see wires oh my.

Ngto
post Apr 19 2016, 08:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 18 2016, 07:25 PM)
The default was Large and 100Hz. I experimented with Small, 80Hz and Small, 60Hz...I found Small, 60Hz was giving more bass. All these is without subwoofer.

I will try again tonight smile.gif

Update: It's Large and 100Hz now. Mainly into movies, the sub should do good sad.gif
*
Since it's large , and you don't have a sub, does it matter what Hz you crossover ?
OPT
post Apr 19 2016, 09:10 AM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 19 2016, 08:51 AM)
Since it's large , and you don't have a sub, does it matter what Hz you crossover ?
*
I don't' really know.

The frequencies basically just gives louder/more bass at a lower volume only I guess. By the way, I can't really switched on a louder volume when I watch the movies 😅...Directive from the Home Minister

This post has been edited by OPT: Apr 19 2016, 09:11 AM
Ngto
post Apr 19 2016, 10:06 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 19 2016, 09:10 AM)
I don't' really know.

The frequencies basically just gives louder/more bass at a lower volume only I guess. By the way, I can't really switched on a louder volume when I watch the movies 😅...Directive from the Home Minister
*
Without a Sub :-

1) When you set your Speakers to large, all frequencies are directed to your Speakers. So your Speakers get the full range. However the very low Bass (.1-LFE channel from 5.1 movies) which is exclusive to only a SUB will be missing. That's why you are missing the Oomph you mentioned.

2) When you set to Small, Whatever Hz you set will be directed to your Sub and cut-off from your Speakers. So you won't get the full range from your speakers. And since you don't have Sub, those frequencies will be completely missing from your hearing. Not to mention, the .1 LFE will be missing as well. Double Oomph gone.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Apr 19 2016, 10:15 AM
OPT
post Apr 19 2016, 03:32 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 19 2016, 10:06 AM)
Without a Sub :-

1) When you set your Speakers to  large, all frequencies are directed to your Speakers. So your Speakers get the full range. However the very low Bass (.1-LFE channel from 5.1 movies)  which is exclusive to only a SUB will be missing. That's why you are missing the Oomph you mentioned.

2) When you set to Small, Whatever Hz you set will be directed to your Sub and cut-off from your Speakers. So you won't get the full range from your speakers. And since you don't have Sub, those frequencies will be completely missing from your hearing. Not to mention, the .1 LFE will be missing as well.  Double Oomph gone.
*
Wow.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Question, assuming the movie files are small, 700mb-ish, which are mainly 2ch 720p, I guess the sound quality is terrible to begin with. Any suggestions? thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif
Ngto
post Apr 19 2016, 08:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 19 2016, 03:32 PM)
Wow.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Question, assuming the movie files are small, 700mb-ish, which are mainly 2ch 720p, I guess the sound quality is terrible to begin with. Any suggestions?  thumbsup.gif  thumbsup.gif
*
Those are mainly 2ch AAC which shows up as PCM in your AVR. You can't do much about the sound quality as they come form all types of questionable sources, a lot of phone camera recordings even.

If the sound is too soft you could try to pre-amplify the sound by using the Manual Vol control of your Media Player device, before outputting to the AVR.

Or if your your HK speakers are full 5 pc set. then you can simulate 5.0 channels with one of your AVR Virtual surround modes like DPL II etc. Only by trial and error will you know they sound better or worse.

OPT
post Apr 19 2016, 09:25 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 19 2016, 08:19 PM)
Those are mainly 2ch AAC which shows up as PCM in your AVR. You can't do much about the sound quality as they come form all types of questionable sources, a lot of phone camera recordings even.

If the sound is too soft you could try to pre-amplify the sound by using the Manual Vol control of your Media Player device, before outputting to the AVR.

Or if your your HK speakers are full 5 pc set. then you can simulate 5.0 channels with one of your AVR Virtual surround modes like DPL II etc. Only by trial and error will you know they sound better or worse.
*
Yeah, sound quality is nothing great even though they are Bluray rips blush.gif

HK have the Logic 7 sound simulation, or I can use the DPL II. Cheers. icon_rolleyes.gif
sonerin
post Apr 19 2016, 09:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 19 2016, 09:25 PM)
Yeah, sound quality is nothing great even though they are Bluray rips  blush.gif

HK have the Logic 7 sound simulation, or I can use the DPL II. Cheers.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
If BD ripped as iso you will get the same as playing back from BD. Of course the file size will be like 35GB for 1 movie
OPT
post Apr 19 2016, 10:05 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(sonerin @ Apr 19 2016, 09:52 PM)
If BD ripped as iso you will get the same as playing back from BD. Of course the file size will be like 35GB for 1 movie
*
Yes, if they are ISO files. I normally go for compressed files (YIFY, etc) blush.gif
sonerin
post Apr 19 2016, 10:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 19 2016, 10:05 PM)
Yes, if they are ISO files. I normally go for compressed files (YIFY, etc)  blush.gif
*
Well as yourself is compressed file so can't complaint
Ngto
post Apr 19 2016, 10:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 19 2016, 10:05 PM)
Yes, if they are ISO files. I normally go for compressed files (YIFY, etc)  blush.gif
*
Before I forget, your HK AVR might have the feature to send the lfe channel to the front L/R. Make sure you set your Subwoofer to None and your Speakers to large, if you have not already done so.
OPT
post Apr 19 2016, 10:23 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 19 2016, 10:17 PM)
Before I forget, your HK AVR might have the feature to send the lfe channel to the front L/R. Make sure you set your Subwoofer to None and your Speakers to large, if you have not already done so.
*
It's always been that way icon_rolleyes.gif
Ngto
post Apr 19 2016, 10:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 19 2016, 10:23 PM)
It's always been that way  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
But then you are watching only Stereo movies, which won't have the Lfe, so won't make a diff.
OPT
post Apr 19 2016, 10:37 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 19 2016, 10:31 PM)
But then you are watching only Stereo movies, which won't have the Lfe, so won't make a diff.
*
LOL. Guess so. The HK Logic 7 helps...a bit tongue.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 20 2016, 01:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ Apr 19 2016, 06:53 AM)
I am currently doing 7.1.4 will take some snapshots in about next week when all speakers are install
*
lust.gif drool.gif
ccschua
post Apr 20 2016, 11:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
I am setting up this HT package for a living room area (not dedicated HT room). therefore the setup will be compromized in terms of HT effects. the living room is around 22ft x 27ft long x 11ft height. Checked the AV setup that the rear presence speakers can be substituted to front presence as per attach. My question is would this setup be suffice for a living room setup or I should go the extra mile and pull the speaker cable to have the rear 2 channel SR and SL.

Since my AV is capable of DTS:X, will it be worthwhile to go for another 2 ceiling speaker ?

This post has been edited by ccschua: Apr 20 2016, 11:22 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
SSJBen
post Apr 20 2016, 05:57 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ccschua @ Apr 20 2016, 11:18 AM)
I am setting up this HT package for a living room area (not dedicated HT room). therefore the setup will be compromized in terms of HT effects. the living room is around 22ft x 27ft long x 11ft height. Checked the AV setup that the rear presence speakers can be substituted to front presence as per attach. My question is would this setup be suffice for a living room setup or I should go the extra mile and pull the speaker cable to have the rear 2 channel SR and SL.

Since my AV is capable of DTS:X, will it be worthwhile to go for another 2 ceiling speaker ?
*
Wait, so you're saying you want to do a 7.1 setup buy instead of surround back left + right, you want to make them function as front presence L/R instead?

So technically then you're having a 5.x.2 setup?
If so, yes that works.

DTS:X is still a novelty now. It may be worthwhile when there are more content with it, but for now I think a solid 7 channel setup with proper placement is more important. Get your basics right first, do everything else second.
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 22 2016, 11:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
It would be great to get Yamaha RX V679 below RM2K this year. I will wait for coming Hari Raya sales or October sales. smile.gif
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 22 2016, 11:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 22 2016, 11:55 PM)
It would be great to get Yamaha RX V679 below RM2K this year. I will wait for coming Hari Raya sales or October sales.  smile.gif
*
user posted image
Yamaha 7.2 ch RX-V679 Network AV receiver

7.2-channel network AV receiver that features HDMI 2.0a for 4K Ultra HD video upscaling, HDCP 2.2 and high dynamic range (HDR) along with advanced multi-zone speaker configurations powered by high quality discrete amp circuitry. Conveniently access music wirelessly with Bluetooth® from your mobile devices or utilize Wi-Fi to stream online music services and high-resolution audio files. Now with MusicCast, this device can be expanded to deliver wireless multiroom audio playback, all controlled by a simple app.

Product details
MusicCast wireless multiroom audio support
Bluetooth® for wireless music streaming and Compressed Music Enhancer for Bluetooth
Built-in Wi-Fi and Wireless Direct
AirPlay®, Pandora®, Rhapsody®, Spotify®, SiriusXM™ music streaming service and AV Controller App
DSD 2.8 MHz / 5.6 MHz, FLAC / WAV / AIFF 192 kHz / 24-bit, Apple® Lossless 96 kHz / 24-bit playback
YPAO™ - Reflected Sound Control for automatic speaker setup
YPAO™ Volume to ensure natural sounds even at low volume
Virtual Surround Back Speaker for playing 7.2-channel content with a 5.1-channel system
Zone 2 audio with Party Mode
Dialogue Lift and Dialogue Volume
HDMI 2.0a: 4K Ultra HD Full Support with 4K60p, HDCP2.2, HDR* Video and BT.2020 pass-through
7.2-channel surround sound

TSjovigrunge
post Apr 23 2016, 12:03 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Klipsch Reference Premiere 7.2 Surround Sound System - Review


sonerin
post Apr 26 2016, 08:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 23 2016, 12:03 AM)
Klipsch Reference Premiere 7.2 Surround Sound System - Review 


*
Klipsch is well known for their HT speakers
SSJBen
post Apr 26 2016, 04:47 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 22 2016, 11:55 PM)
It would be great to get Yamaha RX V679 below RM2K this year. I will wait for coming Hari Raya sales or October sales.  smile.gif
*
Perhaps. But do weigh out what you need. The V679 doesn't have pre-outs which is my biggest gripe about it, so buying it would basically mean you're stuck with it forever (unless you sell and get higher-end amp) with no path to add additional power amps in the future.
If all you're ever doing is 5.1, the 679 is a pretty decent choice for most midrange-market speakers.

bad2928
post Apr 26 2016, 08:50 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 26 2016, 04:47 PM)
Perhaps. But do weigh out what you need. The V679 doesn't have pre-outs which is my biggest gripe about it, so buying it would basically mean you're stuck with it forever (unless you sell and get higher-end amp) with no path to add additional power amps in the future.
If all you're ever doing is 5.1, the 679 is a pretty decent choice for most midrange-market speakers.
*
+1 in avr/amp,price does matter get the highest range you can afford..
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 27 2016, 09:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 26 2016, 04:47 PM)
Perhaps. But do weigh out what you need. The V679 doesn't have pre-outs which is my biggest gripe about it, so buying it would basically mean you're stuck with it forever (unless you sell and get higher-end amp) with no path to add additional power amps in the future.
If all you're ever doing is 5.1, the 679 is a pretty decent choice for most midrange-market speakers.
*
Thanks Ben. I will consider it around BIG SALES. Of course if I can get a DOLBY ATMOS avr for a good bargain, better still. I can confirmed that I will definitely choose Yamaha AVR. icon_rolleyes.gif

As for speakers, still on the crossroad whether to get a wireless or wired speakers and which brand. innocent.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: Apr 27 2016, 09:01 PM
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 27 2016, 09:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(bad2928 @ Apr 26 2016, 08:50 PM)
+1 in avr/amp,price does matter get the highest range you can afford..
*
Spot on bad2928. I will definitely post in this thread before I make an buying move! thumbsup.gif
SSJBen
post Apr 27 2016, 10:24 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 27 2016, 09:00 PM)
Thanks Ben. I will consider it around BIG SALES. Of course if I can get a DOLBY ATMOS avr for a good bargain, better still. I can confirmed that I will definitely choose Yamaha AVR.  icon_rolleyes.gif

As for speakers, still on the crossroad whether to get a wireless or wired speakers and which brand.  innocent.gif
*
Please don't get entry level Dolby Atmos AVRs. They usually come in a 5.1.2 config, which really only works well in small-medium rooms even with 6" drivers in-ceiling speakers. Not to mention these entry-level AVRs has pretty subpar amp sections to begin with, connecting so many speakers is simply crippling your audio performance unless you like to listen at -30db under reference, 3 feet away from your LCRs.

You want to do Atmos, do it properly. Aim for 5.2.4 if 7.2.4 isn't possible. If you can't do either, stick to good ol' 7.2 setup which is extremely immersive if done right.

And please, if you do Atmos, don't buy into those ceiling reflecting speakers bullshit.

As for wireless or wired speakers, I personally will always go wired. Wireless speakers are powered by their puny batteries, of which needs to be designed to "last longer", so the amount of voltage + wattage it supplies to the driver(s)/tweeter will be very limited hence even if the speaker's capability is decent, it can't do justice. Not only that, wireless speakers will mean that if in the event of the battery going dead, you have no choice but to send it back to the manufacturer for replacement. Go wired, plan out your room, look where to run and conceal cables.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Apr 27 2016, 10:26 PM
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 28 2016, 12:08 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 27 2016, 10:24 PM)
Please don't get entry level Dolby Atmos AVRs. They usually come in a 5.1.2 config, which really only works well in small-medium rooms even with 6" drivers in-ceiling speakers. Not to mention these entry-level AVRs has pretty subpar amp sections to begin with, connecting so many speakers is simply crippling your audio performance unless you like to listen at -30db under reference, 3 feet away from your LCRs.

You want to do Atmos, do it properly. Aim for 5.2.4 if 7.2.4 isn't possible. If you can't do either, stick to good ol' 7.2 setup which is extremely immersive if done right.

And please, if you do Atmos, don't buy into those ceiling reflecting speakers bullshit.

As for wireless or wired speakers, I personally will always go wired. Wireless speakers are powered by their puny batteries, of which needs to be designed to "last longer", so the amount of voltage + wattage it supplies to the driver(s)/tweeter will be very limited hence even if the speaker's capability is decent, it can't do justice. Not only that, wireless speakers will mean that if in the event of the battery going dead, you have no choice but to send it back to the manufacturer for replacement. Go wired, plan out your room, look where to run and conceal cables.
*
Thanks again Ben. I'll definitely will heed your wise advise. I don't plan to do wall mount as for the tv. I have bought a 6 feet tv cabinet in advance. This time instead of going for satellite speakers, I think I'll go for bookshelf speakers. hmm.gif
sonerin
post Apr 28 2016, 06:02 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Apr 28 2016, 12:08 AM)
Thanks again Ben. I'll definitely will heed your wise advise. I don't plan to do wall mount as for the tv. I have bought a 6 feet tv cabinet in advance. This time instead of going for satellite speakers, I think I'll go for bookshelf speakers.  hmm.gif
*
Bookshelf is good choice
teop
post Apr 28 2016, 01:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 19 2016, 10:06 AM)
Without a Sub :-

1) When you set your Speakers to  large, all frequencies are directed to your Speakers. So your Speakers get the full range. However the very low Bass (.1-LFE channel from 5.1 movies)  which is exclusive to only a SUB will be missing. That's why you are missing the Oomph you mentioned.

2) When you set to Small, Whatever Hz you set will be directed to your Sub and cut-off from your Speakers. So you won't get the full range from your speakers. And since you don't have Sub, those frequencies will be completely missing from your hearing. Not to mention, the .1 LFE will be missing as well.  Double Oomph gone.
*
What about the surround? If the front and surround is full range and have different frequency respond how do you set the crossover? Or you only target the front speakers?
SSJBen
post Apr 28 2016, 03:54 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(teop @ Apr 28 2016, 01:02 PM)
What about the surround? If the front and surround is full range and have different frequency respond how do you set the crossover? Or you only target the front speakers?
*
Higher-end receivers has individual crossovers for each channel. You generally don't want the surround to be set to large even if you have big bookshelfs/bipoles as surrounds in the event that you set your fronts to 'Large'.

But once again, understand that setting the speakers to "Large" could mean taxing your receiver's amp section near to its max (depending on the speakers, SPL and distance). Will it cause damage? Probably not because the OVP will just kick in. But don't be surprised to suddenly hear distortion, dynamics being compressed (especially the surrounds and center channels) and then you may start to hear clipping.

Doesn't apply to every scenario of course, but generally there's a reason why people who run their L/R as large (assuming they're decent towers) have at least a dedicated power amp for them. Really high-end users have dedicated monoblocks for the stereo stage, but that's getting into the >RM30k stuff (or more).

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Apr 28 2016, 05:40 PM
DannyOP
post Apr 28 2016, 04:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,220 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(sonerin @ Apr 26 2016, 08:44 AM)
Klipsch is well known for their HT speakers
*
$5500 USD, very cheap for reference series plus 2 subwoofers. Anybody use this before?
dirtrun
post Apr 28 2016, 04:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(DannyOP @ Apr 28 2016, 04:16 PM)
$5500 USD, very cheap for reference series plus 2 subwoofers. Anybody use this before?
*

LOL..

RM20k is cheep... biggrin.gif
But seriously... I hvnt got it but rvws dont actually like klpsch subs..

tongue.gif
D
PS :
To add if u list spkrs as large n full range oso means u r taxing ur avr's amps in tat it has to supply pwr to drv ur low end instead of letting LFE be handled by itw own power sourced active sub - note tat even flagship avrs are not powerhouses in any rvw - they only look gud on paper..

This post has been edited by dirtrun: Apr 28 2016, 04:29 PM
SSJBen
post Apr 28 2016, 04:36 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(DannyOP @ Apr 28 2016, 04:16 PM)
$5500 USD, very cheap for reference series plus 2 subwoofers. Anybody use this before?
*
Family in the US has the RF-52 series.
I'll say this much; the horn tweeters aren't for everyone. I'm fine with it, my wife didn't like it. Some family members like it, some needed to walk out of the room.

I like the Klipsch RF series of speakers, I think they're pretty nice, speakers wise. Their main downside are their rather lifeless subs IMO, it can rumble yes, but it lacks the tactility and punch.

Don't have a huge experience with Klipsch and I wouldn't mind having their speakers one day either, but definitely with a sub from Hsu Research or SVS.
DannyOP
post Apr 28 2016, 08:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,220 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 28 2016, 04:36 PM)
Family in the US has the RF-52 series.
I'll say this much; the horn tweeters aren't for everyone. I'm fine with it, my wife didn't like it. Some family members like it, some needed to walk out of the room.

I like the Klipsch RF series of speakers, I think they're pretty nice, speakers wise. Their main downside are their rather lifeless subs IMO, it can rumble yes, but it lacks the tactility and punch.

Don't have a huge experience with Klipsch and I wouldn't mind having their speakers one day either, but definitely with a sub from Hsu Research or SVS.
*
Ah horn tweeters, I'm not used to them also. Had the Triangle Quartet which also uses horn tweeters and felt it is too sharp at the top end.

I prefer more neutral and equally fast speakers eg Martin Logan.
SSJBen
post Apr 28 2016, 09:30 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(DannyOP @ Apr 28 2016, 08:31 PM)
Ah horn tweeters, I'm not used to them also. Had the Triangle Quartet which also uses horn tweeters and felt it is too sharp at the top end.

I prefer more neutral and equally fast speakers eg Martin Logan.
*
Indeed. I think horn tweeters are like a 50/50 thing? At least from a lot of opinions I've read from.

Ah Martin Logans, love their ribbon tweeters. Very smooth indeed without the possible harshness from horn tweeters. Which particular series do you like?
TSjovigrunge
post Apr 29 2016, 05:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image

Truth in Sound, Embodied

For those who appreciate accuracy and realism in their audio, the electrostatic transducer is the grail. For those who understand this truth in sound, Martin Logan introduces their new flagship loudspeaker: Neolith.

Neolith is not for the faint of heart. As the embodiment of our philosophy of the truth in sound, its performance is unconstrained. It goes against the grain. In a world of small, Neolith says size is no impediment.

Neolith features one of Martin Logan's largest electrostatic radiating surfaces, fully 35% larger than the Statement E2. Its proprietary curvilinear electrostatic transducer delivers an ideal wave launch; a detailed, ultrarealistic soundstage, reproducing nearly the entire mid-range and high frequency audio spectrum. It is utterly uninhibited by room limitations.

Smoothly blended low-frequencies are provided by a 15-inch rear-firing ported woofer and 12-inch front-firing sealed mid-bass woofer. Combined, they deliver powerful, extremely accurate bass.

And this is just the beginning. The details demand your attention. The exclusive advanced-topology Vojtko Crossover uses hand-selected components for optimum power handling. The passive Neolith design gives you more control, allowing single-wire or bi-amp connections with silver filigree WBT Binding Posts, plus a unique system of audio adjustment jumpers. The audaciously sculpted Neolith frame is made of non-resonant Phenolic Resin Polymer, smoothly finished in a premium automotive gloss. Its hand-crafted woofer cabinet is wrapped in elegant soft leather.

Prepare yourself for an astonishing new audio experience; a bigger, bolder, no-holds-bared experience of breathtakingly articulate performance. The bespoke Neolith is the culmination of over 30 years of Martin Logan passion, engineering innovation and dedication to the ultimate truth in sound.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

drool.gif
capoi
post Apr 30 2016, 10:22 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


Dear all Sifus,

Please give me some input according to your experience and knowledge. I'm currently using Panasonic HTiB SC-PT580.
Panasonic SA-PT580

I want to know if I plan to buy an AVR to experience at least Dolby True HD, DTS HDMA and a minimulm DTS, can I reuse the speakers and subwoofer?

My HTiB currently support Dolby sound only. What I read on website, the subwoofer is 250w 6 ohm, center 250w 6 ohm, front left right and rear left right 125w 3 ohm. Can those speakers coop with the AVR? I'm not really know which AVR model yet. With this HTiB, the max volume I ever test was around 60%. Average about 50%.

If I can't use back the speakers, i need to spend more money.Unfortunately, i don't have a bottomless wallet here.
SSJBen
post Apr 30 2016, 07:19 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(capoi @ Apr 30 2016, 10:22 AM)
Dear all Sifus,

Please give me some input according to your experience and knowledge. I'm currently using Panasonic HTiB SC-PT580.
Panasonic SA-PT580

I want to know if I plan to buy an AVR to experience at least Dolby True HD, DTS HDMA and a minimulm DTS, can I reuse the speakers and subwoofer?

My HTiB currently support Dolby sound only. What I read on website, the subwoofer is 250w 6 ohm, center 250w 6 ohm, front left right and rear left right 125w 3 ohm. Can those speakers coop with the AVR? I'm not really know which AVR model yet. With this HTiB, the max volume I ever test was around 60%. Average about 50%.

If I can't use back the speakers, i need to spend more money.Unfortunately, i don't have a bottomless wallet here.
*
Are you sure it only supports Dolby Digital? How come it says under its manual it supports DTS then?
You sure you are bitstreaming correctly?

To answer your question, no it wouldn't be advisable (if it's even possible) to use them with a receiver. Your sub is passive type for one and all of those power ratings are complete bullshit anyways. Not only that, those speakers are likely very low impedance (perhaps 2 or 3 ohms, usually). Majority of consumer-grade receivers cannot handle that kind of load into speakers without clipping or auto-shutting off at high volumes.

So yes, that leaves you back at square one:

1) Spend some money to do a proper HT system and do it right.
2) Stick with what you have check your settings to see why can't you have DTS decoded (which is weird, because the manual says it does).
capoi
post Apr 30 2016, 08:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 30 2016, 07:19 PM)
Are you sure it only supports Dolby Digital? How come it says under its manual it supports DTS then?
You sure you are bitstreaming correctly?

To answer your question, no it wouldn't be advisable (if it's even possible) to use them with a receiver. Your sub is passive type for one and all of those power ratings are complete bullshit anyways. Not only that, those speakers are likely very low impedance (perhaps 2 or 3 ohms, usually). Majority of consumer-grade receivers cannot handle that kind of load into speakers without clipping or auto-shutting off at high volumes.

So yes, that leaves you back at square one:

1) Spend some money to do a proper HT system and do it right.
2) Stick with what you have check your settings to see why can't you have DTS decoded (which is weird, because the manual says it does).
*
I'm aware of DTS support but it only can if I play DTS from DVD. I'm using media player. If I set it to bitstream, no sound will come out. I'm using optical cable from media player to HTiB. If Dolby, no problem at all.

Regarding my question, if I want to setup a new HT, what is a minimum budget I need to allocate? At least it can give me a bit of idea about budget. At least the AVR i buy will give a same result if not better compared to my HTiB. If I know about budget, then I can plan to start saving from now. I don't need a big speakers but at least it can coop with the load from AVR.
OPT
post Apr 30 2016, 11:08 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(capoi @ Apr 30 2016, 08:42 PM)
I'm aware of DTS support but it only can if I play DTS from DVD. I'm using media player. If I set it to bitstream, no sound will come out. I'm using optical cable from media player to HTiB. If Dolby, no problem at all.

Regarding my question, if I want to setup a new HT, what is a minimum budget I need to allocate? At least it can give me a bit of idea about budget. At least the AVR i buy will give a same result if not better compared to my HTiB. If I know about budget, then I can plan to start saving from now. I don't need a big speakers but at least it can coop with the load from AVR.
*
Sharing my experience...

I bought 1.6k Harman Kardon AVR + 5.1 satellite speakers...display unit few years back (what a bargain!)

Later, I found the satellite's not to my liking, but decent speakers are quite expensive (in my opinion..), so I browsed through mudah.my for used speakers and found a Jamo 3 speakers (center+2 front floorstanding only sad.gif) for 900. I purchased it.

Later I put my satellites in mudah and sold them for 1.3k...and later i bought new Jamo surround bookshelf for 600.

Very happy with what i have for now, though no sub.

I would advise to go for a decent AVR and slowly upgrade the speakers smile.gif

This post has been edited by OPT: May 1 2016, 08:24 AM
SSJBen
post Apr 30 2016, 11:35 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(capoi @ Apr 30 2016, 08:42 PM)
I'm aware of DTS support but it only can if I play DTS from DVD. I'm using media player. If I set it to bitstream, no sound will come out. I'm using optical cable from media player to HTiB. If Dolby, no problem at all.

Regarding my question, if I want to setup a new HT, what is a minimum budget I need to allocate? At least it can give me a bit of idea about budget. At least the AVR i buy will give a same result if not better compared to my HTiB. If I know about budget, then I can plan to start saving from now. I don't need a big speakers but at least it can coop with the load from AVR.
*
Then it's your media player that doesn't support carrying DTS from optical out, not your HTiB player problem.

If you go all second hand, you could get away with a 5.1 setup at relatively low budget; say around RM4k+ including an entry level AVR. My suggestion, you set aside a fixed budget and get the best left, center and right channels + a decent receiver first. Then add the surrounds when you have a higher budget.

Popular and decent entry level mid-fi speakers range from Pioneer's AJ series and Sony Core Series speakers. They're relatively cheap, offer good sound and a great value.
herojack41
post May 1 2016, 01:04 AM

Master Of Trouble Maker
*******
Senior Member
5,697 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist



QUOTE(OPT @ Apr 30 2016, 11:08 PM)
Sharing my experience...

I bought 1.6k Harman Kardon AVR + 5.1 satellite speakers...display unit few years back (what a bargain!)

Later, I found the satellite's not to my liking, but decent speakers are quite expensive (in my opinion..), so I browsed through mudah.my for used speakers and found a Jamo 3 speakers (center+2 front only sad.gif) for 900. I purchased it.

Later I put my satellites in mudah and sold them for 1.3k...and later i bought new Jamo surround bookshelf for 600.

Very happy with what i have for now, though no sub.

I would advise to go for a decent AVR and slowly upgrade the speakers  smile.gif
*
laugh.gif thats 1 complicated history

well.....yeah should get a decent AVR first and decide the speakers later

coz the AVR is the thing that ppl wont keep on changing.

currently using onkyo TX-NR709

thinking to get a new pair of floor standing speakers but pricing of a "decent" 1 easily hit 2k+ bangwall.gif
capoi
post May 1 2016, 02:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Apr 30 2016, 11:35 PM)
Then it's your media player that doesn't support carrying DTS from optical out, not your HTiB player problem.

If you go all second hand, you could get away with a 5.1 setup at relatively low budget; say around RM4k+ including an entry level AVR. My suggestion, you set aside a fixed budget and get the best left, center and right channels + a decent receiver first. Then add the surrounds when you have a higher budget.

Popular and decent entry level mid-fi speakers range from Pioneer's AJ series and Sony Core Series speakers. They're relatively cheap, offer good sound and a great value.
*
Actually it was a common issue for Panasonic system via optical. I read it in AVS forum.

I.think its not easy to find a secondhand avr and speaker. I lurking at Onkyo and Denon website. The price is around 2k-3k. May I know where can I check the speakers info? Only found a few in lazada.
OPT
post May 1 2016, 08:28 AM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(capoi @ May 1 2016, 02:12 AM)
Actually it was a common issue for Panasonic system via optical. I read it in AVS forum.

I.think its not easy to find a secondhand avr and speaker. I lurking at Onkyo and Denon website. The price is around 2k-3k. May I know where can I check the speakers info? Only found a few in lazada.
*
I'd suggest Mudah website or hifi.net (or something like that...)

IMHO, AVRs and speakers are quite long lasting. Shouldn't be an issue with display or used unit.

Desa Home Theater sometimes sell these new units at quite a bargain...
ccschua
post May 1 2016, 12:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
I wonder if its possible to use JBL Charge 2+ as satellites. it seems this little boombox is not only clear and nice but also bluetooth.
TSjovigrunge
post May 1 2016, 03:47 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(OPT @ May 1 2016, 08:28 AM)
I'd suggest Mudah website or hifi.net (or something like that...)

IMHO, AVRs and speakers are quite long lasting. Shouldn't be an issue with display or used unit.

Desa Home Theater sometimes sell these new units at quite a bargain...
*
I agree. Desa Home Theatre offers very good bargain during big sales. I will go there and buy (Kepong). icon_rolleyes.gif
SSJBen
post May 1 2016, 06:53 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(capoi @ May 1 2016, 02:12 AM)
Actually it was a common issue for Panasonic system via optical. I read it in AVS forum.

I.think its not easy to find a secondhand avr and speaker. I lurking at Onkyo and Denon website. The price is around 2k-3k. May I know where can I check the speakers info? Only found a few in lazada.
*
Search hifi4sale.

You just missed a big sale by Desa HT Kepong just a couple of weeks ago. They were letting go many AVRs for some seriously good prices.
The next sale should probably be around KLIAV2016, but don't put too much hope on it.

As for speakers, search up what you want first. Check reviews online, unfortunately majority of which are not local but you can at least get the idea. Then source out AV stores for prices.

Yes, buying speakers in Malaysia isn't easy. The market is simply too small here and it's still shrinking.


QUOTE(ccschua @ May 1 2016, 12:36 PM)
I wonder if its possible to use JBL Charge 2+ as satellites. it seems this little boombox is not only clear and nice but also bluetooth.
*
No. Where are you going to send the analog signal to? The speakers has no inputs other than USB.
SUSsupersound
post May 2 2016, 09:59 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(ccschua @ May 1 2016, 12:36 PM)
I wonder if its possible to use JBL Charge 2+ as satellites. it seems this little boombox is not only clear and nice but also bluetooth.
*
Small room is ok, but not bigger room.
ccschua
post May 5 2016, 07:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
I wonder if anyone consider this speakers for a low to medium performance HT system. its mount in ceiling and looks neat and nice. the review says its good.

I wonder if anyone install this and is it suitable for our plaster ceiling ?

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000O3TFZO/?tag=constop-20
SUSjdgobio
post May 5 2016, 03:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
Need some advice from the gurus here.

A friend wants to sell me his Yamaha Aventage RX-A1020 (2013 model) for RM1,750.

I currently have a Yamaha RX-V371 (entry level Year 2011 model) and Tannoy Mercury V4 floor-standers with a 12" subwoofer. Plan to get the Tannoy centre & rear speakers soon. I don't foresee going beyond 5.1 anytime soon but having a 7.1 capable AVR wouldn't hurt.

So my question is whether the A1020 is worth it for the price and will it make any difference compared to my current AVR?
Or should I just get the 2016 model RX-V481 (not available yet) which will cost around the same price but have newer functions like hdcp 2.2, hdmi 2.0 and more network functions compared to the Aventage?


dirtrun
post May 5 2016, 03:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(ccschua @ May 5 2016, 07:49 AM)
I wonder if anyone consider this speakers for a low to medium performance HT system. its mount in ceiling and looks neat and nice. the review says its good.

I wonder if anyone install this and is it suitable for our plaster ceiling ?

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000O3TFZO/?tag=constop-20
*

FWIW,

I got tis :

user posted image
JBL in-ceiling spkrs

l tried em by substitutin it for my fronts [ plugged in de fronts red/blck bananas ] ; it was all for a little while so l guess its not a real honest to goodness trial but it sounded tinny - l suspect its lack of bracing and box contributes to tis..
For wat its intended for [ overhead spkrs once ; if ever ; l do go atmos route..] , l guess it wont be too shabby..
But l wont go tis route for proper boxed spkrs for surrs - l prefer to know exactly where my sound is coming from boom/bang bass included..

laugh.gif
D

dirtrun
post May 5 2016, 03:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 5 2016, 03:28 PM)
Need some advice from the gurus here.

A friend wants to sell me his Yamaha Aventage RX-A1020 (2013 model) for RM1,750.

I currently have a Yamaha RX-V371 (entry level Year 2011 model) and Tannoy Mercury V4 floor-standers with a 12" subwoofer. Plan to get the Tannoy centre & rear speakers soon. I don't foresee going beyond 5.1 anytime soon but having a 7.1 capable AVR wouldn't hurt.

So my question is whether the A1020 is worth it for the price and will it make any difference compared to my current AVR?
Or should I just get the 2016 model RX-V481 (not available yet) which will cost around the same price but have newer functions like hdcp 2.2, hdmi 2.0 and more network functions compared to the Aventage?
*

My 2 cts worth,

Buying used is all about timing .. do u find tis model appealing, sonically? It shld have more 'muscle' than wat u are used to.. Do u need de xtra juice?
Do u need the 2016 functions you mentioned? If so, then you already answered your own question..

For me, a more upmarket model is always better than a newer model budget amp..

To me.. tongue.gif
D

SSJBen
post May 5 2016, 04:07 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 5 2016, 03:28 PM)
Need some advice from the gurus here.

A friend wants to sell me his Yamaha Aventage RX-A1020 (2013 model) for RM1,750.

I currently have a Yamaha RX-V371 (entry level Year 2011 model) and Tannoy Mercury V4 floor-standers with a 12" subwoofer. Plan to get the Tannoy centre & rear speakers soon. I don't foresee going beyond 5.1 anytime soon but having a 7.1 capable AVR wouldn't hurt.

So my question is whether the A1020 is worth it for the price and will it make any difference compared to my current AVR?
Or should I just get the 2016 model RX-V481 (not available yet) which will cost around the same price but have newer functions like hdcp 2.2, hdmi 2.0 and more network functions compared to the Aventage?
*
Do you absolutely need HDMI 2.0 and HDCP 2.2? I mean, do you have a UHD TV or 4k Projector? If you do, then are you going to invest in 4k BD players? And again, IF you do, are you going to invest in buying UHD BDs?

I know "UHD" and "HDR" is the it thing now. If you're going to advantage of HDR, is your UHD TV capable of doing HDR in the first place? Everyone wants it, but many don't understand why they actually do.

Then the other features like Atmos or DTS:X. Are you planning to do either format anytime soon? Even if you are, the 481 will be tied to 7 channels processing only. So your only choice is 5.x.2, is your room size too big as to render the heights useless? These are things you have to figure out.

If I were you, I'd get the A1020 without a hint of a doubt.
With the A1020 you get better components, you get a better power supply, you get a better transformer in there, you get things that the Aventage line have where the "V" series doesn't, all for roughly the same price.
SUSjdgobio
post May 5 2016, 04:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 5 2016, 03:42 PM)
My 2 cts worth,

Buying used is all about timing .. do u find tis model appealing, sonically? It shld have more 'muscle' than wat u are used to.. Do u need de xtra juice?
Do u need the 2016 functions you mentioned? If so, then you already answered your own question..

For me, a more upmarket model is always better than a newer model budget amp..

To me.. tongue.gif
D
*
Can't really say much about the sonic appeal coz I have listened to it with some nice PSB speakers for a while but not with my Tannoys. Can't really say that I can make out any difference in terms of sound quality.
My current AVR drives the Tannoys well but I have no idea whether a better AVR with more power will make a noticeable difference.
Compared to my current AVR which has no network function/on-screen display, this Aventage seems good with LAN port and OSD. Wireless & bluetooth is lacking but i guess I can live with that. The main drawback is that newer 4k hdmi standards are not supported.

If I get a 2016 model AVR, I will get the full 4k hdmi support and probably wireless support as well but the power will be less.

I was also having the same thought as you to get a more upmarket amp. What do you think about the price? Does it seem reasonable?
SUSjdgobio
post May 5 2016, 04:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 5 2016, 04:07 PM)
Do you absolutely need HDMI 2.0 and HDCP 2.2? I mean, do you have a UHD TV or 4k Projector? If you do, then are you going to invest in 4k BD players? And again, IF you do, are you going to invest in buying UHD BDs?

I know "UHD" and "HDR" is the it thing now. If you're going to advantage of HDR, is your UHD TV capable of doing HDR in the first place? Everyone wants it, but many don't understand why they actually do.

Then the other features like Atmos or DTS:X. Are you planning to do either format anytime soon? Even if you are, the 481 will be tied to 7 channels processing only. So your only choice is 5.x.2, is your room size too big as to render the heights useless? These are things you have to figure out.

If I were you, I'd get the A1020 without a hint of a doubt.
With the A1020 you get better components, you get a better power supply, you get a better transformer in there, you get things that the Aventage line have where the "V" series doesn't, all for roughly the same price.
*
I have a 2015 model UHD TV which is HDR "capable". Since the HDR standards were only adopted during CES 2016 (UHD Premium), I am not fully confident about HDR compatibility with the new crop of UHD BDs but I have seen visible differences with downloaded sample files with HDR. At the moment due to the dearth of content, have no plans to invest in 4k BDPs and discs. But, I believe once content becomes plenty, it will be very much worth it to invest in UHD BDs. But I don't see this hapenning at least untill the later part of 2017.

While I would like to get Atmos & DTS:X, on a practical note due to wife acceptance & budget, I will not be looking at it anytime soon. In 5 years time, maybe.

Thanks for your opinion on what you would do. Gives me the confidence that getting it will be the right choice smile.gif



dirtrun
post May 5 2016, 04:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 5 2016, 04:15 PM)
Can't really say much about the sonic appeal coz I have listened to it with some nice PSB speakers for a while but not with my Tannoys. Can't really say that I can make out any difference in terms of sound quality.
My current AVR drives the Tannoys well but I have no idea whether a better AVR with more power will make a noticeable difference.
Compared to my current AVR which has no network function/on-screen display, this Aventage seems good with LAN port and OSD. Wireless & bluetooth is lacking but i guess I can live with that. The main drawback is that newer 4k hdmi standards are not supported.

If I get a 2016 model AVR, I will get the full 4k hdmi support and probably wireless support as well but the power will be less.

I was also having the same thought as you to get a more upmarket amp. What do you think about the price? Does it seem reasonable?
*
On paper,

A double pwr [watts] will only give a 3 db gain - all tings considered but tats outrite power not de small nuances a better power generates on your spkr - de only way to knw is to plug it in n hear for yourslf - personally l tink itll be a little difference only..

I cant answer for you but if l were to upgrade my avr now [ 7002 ] , l would be looking for an atmos/dts X capable one..
N since l am used to my ol ones sound - l guess a budget one is out of d question..

Price for d used yammy .. hmmnn, how much was it, new? Shld at least be half price - less is better cos if anyting goes wrong.. well.. it all adds up..

tongue.gif
D
SUSjdgobio
post May 5 2016, 06:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 5 2016, 04:38 PM)
On paper,

A double pwr [watts] will only give a 3 db gain - all tings considered but tats outrite power not de small nuances a better power generates on your spkr - de only way to knw is to plug it in n hear for yourslf - personally l tink itll be a little difference only..

I cant answer for you but if l were to upgrade my avr now [ 7002 ] , l would be looking for an atmos/dts X capable one..
N since l am used to my ol ones sound - l guess a budget one is out of d question..

Price for d used yammy .. hmmnn, how much was it, new? Shld at least be half price - less is better cos if anyting goes wrong.. well.. it all adds up..

tongue.gif
D
*
Thanks for your insight. I also believe the nuances will be small that a non-audiophile like me may not appreciate the differences.
Well, since I am used to budget receivers, even a step-up to 4 or 5 series Yamaha AVRs will be good enough especially with all the new functions available now.

I think it was about RM3,000 new, so RM1,500 and below will be a good price.

I saw the RX-V579 at RM1,800 - clearance price. Maybe, that's a good option as well.
ccschua
post May 5 2016, 08:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 5 2016, 03:35 PM)
FWIW,

I got tis :

user posted image
JBL in-ceiling spkrs

l tried em by substitutin it for my fronts [ plugged in de fronts red/blck bananas ] ; it was all for a  little while so l guess its not a real honest to goodness trial but it sounded tinny - l suspect its lack of bracing and box contributes to tis..
For wat its intended for [ overhead spkrs once ; if ever ; l do go atmos route..] , l guess it wont be too shabby..
But l wont go tis route for proper boxed spkrs for surrs - l prefer to know exactly where my sound is coming from boom/bang bass included..

laugh.gif
D
*
I would never compromise the front. I am using B&W for the front and mid and a audiopro 12" for the sub.

I am just think if the surround or atmos can be ceiling mounted

TSjovigrunge
post May 6 2016, 12:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 5 2016, 03:35 PM)
FWIW,

I got tis :

user posted image
JBL in-ceiling spkrs

l tried em by substitutin it for my fronts [ plugged in de fronts red/blck bananas ] ; it was all for a  little while so l guess its not a real honest to goodness trial but it sounded tinny - l suspect its lack of bracing and box contributes to tis..
For wat its intended for [ overhead spkrs once ; if ever ; l do go atmos route..] , l guess it wont be too shabby..
But l wont go tis route for proper boxed spkrs for surrs - l prefer to know exactly where my sound is coming from boom/bang bass included..

laugh.gif
D
*

user posted image

I get the picture what you're trying to achieve! icon_idea.gif
dirtrun
post May 6 2016, 08:32 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(ccschua @ May 5 2016, 08:24 PM)
I would never compromise the front. I am using B&W for the front and mid and a audiopro 12" for the sub.

I am just think if the surround or atmos can be ceiling mounted
*
I hv a frnd who has B&W ceiling spkrs as surrs in his Media Room n .. to me, its a compromise, at best [all for WAF.. l guess]..
as it isnt half as gud as my own 4 SBS-01 surrs.. I went from Jbl Control 1's to tis n it gvs a much fuller comprehensive sound then satts [size does count, in the end]
So.. to me unless WAF or aesthetics play a pivotal role in your decision, l'd avoid ceiling spkrs as surrounds.. too..

smile.gif
D
sonerin
post May 6 2016, 03:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 6 2016, 08:32 AM)
I hv a frnd who has B&W ceiling spkrs as surrs in his Media Room n .. to me, its a compromise, at best [all for WAF.. l guess]..
as it isnt half as gud as my own 4 SBS-01 surrs.. I went from Jbl Control 1's to tis n it gvs a much fuller comprehensive sound then satts [size does count, in the end]
So.. to me unless WAF or aesthetics play a pivotal role in your decision, l'd avoid ceiling spkrs as surrounds.. too..

smile.gif
D
*
Ceiling speaker is good and is something you need for proper atmos.
SSJBen
post May 6 2016, 05:37 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 6 2016, 08:32 AM)
I hv a frnd who has B&W ceiling spkrs as surrs in his Media Room n .. to me, its a compromise, at best [all for WAF.. l guess]..
as it isnt half as gud as my own 4 SBS-01 surrs.. I went from Jbl Control 1's to tis n it gvs a much fuller comprehensive sound then satts [size does count, in the end]
So.. to me unless WAF or aesthetics play a pivotal role in your decision, l'd avoid ceiling spkrs as surrounds.. too..

smile.gif
D
*
hmm.gif

I think on-ceiling speakers angled towards the MLP can work as surrounds though, as long as they are monopoles and the drivers aren't too wide dispersion by design. Not ideal, but the best compromise if WAF is a thing (seriously I think WAF is a really dumb 'issue').

I've been experimenting with using towers as surrounds too, not my setup but damn... if one has the space, definitely try towers for surrounds. It may look stupid, but the visceral impact a tower can give is bone rattling (in addition with a good sub of course).
SUSsupersound
post May 7 2016, 11:56 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
I still remember how I gave Rogers speakers a second life. I only buy a tube of wood glue, a Bosch Power Tool since there's 30 screws needs to be removed, reapply the wood glue to all the corners.
And by doing a blind hearing test to the owner, he thought I changed the whole set of speakers.
What I want to say is, don't just look at brands, the built quality are more important.

TSjovigrunge
post May 8 2016, 04:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
There are so many brands. It depends on preferences? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: May 8 2016, 04:50 AM
SSJBen
post May 9 2016, 03:45 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 8 2016, 04:47 AM)
There are so many brands. It depends on preferences? hmm.gif
*
A lot of brands buy drivers from China anyways. They design their own crossovers (which is the most time consuming part), the cabinet design, bracing, size, port if needed and sometimes the amp if its an active speaker or a sub.

The drivers aren't expensive, it's the R&D which is the actual bulk of the cost that consumers pay for when buying speakers (other than the snake oil of course tongue.gif )
TSjovigrunge
post May 9 2016, 11:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 9 2016, 03:45 PM)
A lot of brands buy drivers from China anyways. They design their own crossovers (which is the most time consuming part), the cabinet design, bracing, size, port if needed and sometimes the amp if its an active speaker or a sub.

The drivers aren't expensive, it's the R&D which is the actual bulk of the cost that consumers pay for when buying speakers (other than the snake oil of course tongue.gif )
*
The tricky part is how to get it cheap........ rclxs0.gif
SSJBen
post May 10 2016, 04:06 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 9 2016, 11:13 PM)
The tricky part is how to get it cheap........  rclxs0.gif
*
Not tricky at all - http://www.parts-express.com/cat/pro-woofe...nge-speakers/31


They're easy to get, they're cheap to buy.
If you have a knack for good worksmanship, you can build your own speakers and subs. Warranty lifetime, everything lifetime. You pay considerably less money because you don't have to deal with bullshit marketing and whatever else.

Best of all? You build your own speakers, you have your own sound. You know what they say right? What sounds best to you is what's most important, nothing else is.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: May 10 2016, 04:07 PM
TSjovigrunge
post May 11 2016, 07:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 10 2016, 04:06 PM)
Not tricky at all - http://www.parts-express.com/cat/pro-woofe...nge-speakers/31
They're easy to get, they're cheap to buy.
If you have a knack for good worksmanship, you can build your own speakers and subs. Warranty lifetime, everything lifetime. You pay considerably less money because you don't have to deal with bullshit marketing and whatever else.

Best of all? You build your own speakers, you have your own sound. You know what they say right? What sounds best to you is what's most important, nothing else is.
*
shakehead.gif
sonerin
post May 11 2016, 09:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 11 2016, 07:00 PM)
shakehead.gif
*
Soon will be more Malaysia brand in coming
OPT
post May 11 2016, 09:23 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
I have a Jamo HCS S626 for about 6-7 months now...pairing with HK receiver

Somehow, feels a bit lacking in oomph...

Is it common to always want a better HT?
bad2928
post May 11 2016, 09:29 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(OPT @ May 11 2016, 09:23 PM)
I have a Jamo HCS S626 for about 6-7 months now...pairing with HK receiver

Somehow, feels a bit lacking in oomph...

Is it common to always want a better HT?
*
its never ending upgrading rolleyes.gif
OPT
post May 11 2016, 10:08 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(bad2928 @ May 11 2016, 09:29 PM)
its never ending upgrading rolleyes.gif
*
cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif
SSJBen
post May 11 2016, 10:31 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(OPT @ May 11 2016, 09:23 PM)
I have a Jamo HCS S626 for about 6-7 months now...pairing with HK receiver

Somehow, feels a bit lacking in oomph...

Is it common to always want a better HT?
*
Welcome to the upgrade bug club.

It'll stop when you find your sweet spot. If you keep having that urge to upgrade, then it simply means you haven't found what you really like despite being happy with what you already have. Very common and it's something that many people don't want to admit. tongue.gif
dirtrun
post May 12 2016, 08:19 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(OPT @ May 11 2016, 09:23 PM)
I have a Jamo HCS S626 for about 6-7 months now...pairing with HK receiver

Somehow, feels a bit lacking in oomph...

Is it common to always want a better HT?
*
Hell.. yeah..

Especially if u always go to AV shows and other rich friends place - n then come home to compare..

cool2.gif
D
TSjovigrunge
post May 12 2016, 02:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 12 2016, 08:19 AM)
Hell.. yeah..

Especially if u always go to AV shows and other rich friends place - n then come home to compare..

cool2.gif
D
*
Kiasu? brows.gif
Ngto
post May 14 2016, 09:04 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Desa HT having 3 day Sale, Last day tomorrow Sunday.
TSjovigrunge
post May 14 2016, 01:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(Ngto @ May 14 2016, 09:04 AM)
Desa HT having 3 day Sale, Last day tomorrow Sunday.
*
Anybody buying anything there? Care to share? icon_idea.gif
TSjovigrunge
post May 14 2016, 01:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Here's the sales catalogue!

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Ngto
post May 14 2016, 10:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 14 2016, 01:20 PM)
Anybody buying anything there? Care to share?  icon_idea.gif
*
Nope , pocket empty. Just want to inform those who are interested smile.gif
SSJBen
post May 15 2016, 12:54 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


The usual stuff that they are letting go, nothing special unless you need it. Mostly models from 2015 and 2014, they need to clear as much as possible.
sonerin
post May 15 2016, 09:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Yamaha is coming with new models for the RX series this year
sivanathan04
post May 16 2016, 01:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


I think now I'm in a right thread....planning to get Sony all in one bdv9200w but some members here already poison me to get a beginner avr and satellite speaker..my living room size 28feet long 10feet width 10feet height...which satellite 5.1 speaker suits me..wanna connect to my sharp 630x.hope sounds good then the 9200w..budget 2.5k..usage for Astro,dvd/bluray and music..suggest me some good beginner models I can look for...going to get before Raya...just doing some survey in lazada and saw the Yamaha nsp40 satellite speaker looks small but is it a good fit for my living room..pls don't ask me go n listen first because here my area very hard to find audio related shop...I think so far senheng is the best in my area taiping...thats why I'm going to buy in desa home kepong..i will go with member suggestion here caused so far it didn't go wrong..i bought my tv from member suggestion here too..so nice suggestion or idea pls...thank you friends🙏

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 16 2016, 01:20 AM
TSjovigrunge
post May 16 2016, 02:09 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 15 2016, 09:26 PM)
Yamaha is coming with new models for the RX series this year
*
RX- V381, 481, 581 & 681 as stated by bro Ben? brows.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: May 16 2016, 02:16 AM
TSjovigrunge
post May 16 2016, 02:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 16 2016, 01:18 AM)
I think now I'm in a right thread....planning to get Sony all in one bdv9200w but some members here already poison me to get a beginner avr and satellite speaker..my living room size 28feet long 10feet width 10feet height...which satellite 5.1 speaker suits me..wanna connect to my sharp 630x.hope sounds good then the 9200w..budget 2.5k..usage for Astro,dvd/bluray and music..suggest me some good beginner models I can look for...going to get before Raya...just doing some survey in lazada and saw the Yamaha nsp40 satellite speaker looks small but is it a good fit for my living room..pls don't ask me go n listen first because here my area very hard to find audio related shop...I think so far senheng is the best in my area taiping...thats why I'm going to buy in desa home kepong..i will go with member suggestion here caused so far it didn't go wrong..i bought my tv from member suggestion here too..so nice suggestion or idea pls...thank you friends🙏
*
Desa Home Theatre guys will be guiding you. Just state your budget to them but still I will highly recommend you go for a proper av receiver and satellite speakers for beginner. Hari Raya sales will be a smart choice to buy and if not either by October this year or by early January next year. smile.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: May 16 2016, 02:18 AM
sonerin
post May 16 2016, 06:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 16 2016, 02:09 AM)
RX- V381, 481, 581 & 681 as stated by bro Ben?  brows.gif
*
Also 781. All with atmos
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 03:54 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 16 2016, 02:15 AM)
Desa Home Theatre guys will be guiding you. Just state your budget to them but still I will highly recommend you go for a proper av receiver and satellite speakers for beginner. Hari Raya sales will be a smart choice to buy and if not either by October this year or by early January next year.  smile.gif
*
😊 too many poison in my head now haha hope not burn my pocket out http://vbizz.com/spk51wn-5ch-speaker-packa...alnut-5073.html just saw few 5.1 speakers within my budget mayb abit over 2.5k.. http://vbizz.com/spk160rw-5ch-speaker-package-5071.html searching keep going on...feel like wanna try the floor type 5.1 the Yamaha np40 I think for living room abit small..the spk51 price around rm1500 if i can get a avr for rm1400 it will be around rm2900...most probably will get it on Raya corner..😋

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 17 2016, 03:56 AM
sonerin
post May 17 2016, 06:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 03:54 AM)
😊 too many poison in my head now haha hope not burn my pocket out http://vbizz.com/spk51wn-5ch-speaker-packa...alnut-5073.html just saw few 5.1 speakers within my budget mayb abit over 2.5k.. http://vbizz.com/spk160rw-5ch-speaker-package-5071.html searching keep going on...feel like wanna try the floor type 5.1 the Yamaha np40 I think for living room abit small..the spk51 price around rm1500 if i can get a avr for rm1400 it will be around rm2900...most probably will get it on Raya corner..😋
*
Happy hunting
OPT
post May 17 2016, 09:41 AM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 03:54 AM)
😊 too many poison in my head now haha hope not burn my pocket out http://vbizz.com/spk51wn-5ch-speaker-packa...alnut-5073.html just saw few 5.1 speakers within my budget mayb abit over 2.5k.. http://vbizz.com/spk160rw-5ch-speaker-package-5071.html searching keep going on...feel like wanna try the floor type 5.1 the Yamaha np40 I think for living room abit small..the spk51 price around rm1500 if i can get a avr for rm1400 it will be around rm2900...most probably will get it on Raya corner..😋
*
Now you are talking!

Yes, there are bargains around. Any of these will blow the HTiB away rclxms.gif
SUSjdgobio
post May 17 2016, 10:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 19 2016, 05:52 PM)
Pricing is actually insanely good lol. Why? Because it comes with free BD-7200 player and a MDR1ABT headphone. You sell both off at 80% price from new and the DN1060 is like only 1.4k.

The DN1060 also doesn't sound half bad, in fact very good. Great soundstage, good imaging, punchy dynamics (lol not Sony's forte at all previously).
Too bad it falls short on the video department though, only ONE HDCP 2.2 capable port (ridiculous), no HDR support via firmware, only 1 port does 4:4:4 @ 60hz and input lag that cannot be eradicated.

Then there's the reliability.... well, the 1060 hasn't been out that long yet to hear about the horror stories of Sony receivers going dead for no reason what so ever.
*
I know that this an old post, but how did you get that promotion price with free headphone & bd player?
Any idea if the promotion is still available? Thanks.
TSjovigrunge
post May 17 2016, 03:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 16 2016, 06:35 AM)
Also 781. All with atmos
*
All with ATMOS? I don't think so..... confused.gif
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 03:51 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 17 2016, 06:53 AM)
Happy hunting
*
QUOTE(OPT @ May 17 2016, 09:41 AM)
Now you are talking!

Yes, there are bargains around. Any of these will blow the HTiB away  rclxms.gif
*
Thank you 😋...spk51 looks ok hope desa home theater have it...
TSjovigrunge
post May 17 2016, 03:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 03:54 AM)
😊 too many poison in my head now haha hope not burn my pocket out http://vbizz.com/spk51wn-5ch-speaker-packa...alnut-5073.html just saw few 5.1 speakers within my budget mayb abit over 2.5k.. http://vbizz.com/spk160rw-5ch-speaker-package-5071.html searching keep going on...feel like wanna try the floor type 5.1 the Yamaha np40 I think for living room abit small..the spk51 price around rm1500 if i can get a avr for rm1400 it will be around rm2900...most probably will get it on Raya corner..😋
*

Quite expensive stuff in the website.
For instant vbizz = Yamaha AV RX -V379 = RM1966.30
Other websites it cost only about RM1399

rolleyes.gif
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 04:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 17 2016, 03:58 PM)
Quite expensive stuff in the website.
For instant vbizz = Yamaha AV RX -V379 = RM1966.30
Other websites it cost only about RM1399

rolleyes.gif
*
Sure I wont buy from the vbizz 😋 http://vbizz.com/spk160rw-5ch-speaker-package-5071.html
U have seen this speaker u know how much roughly the price is???...but rm1966 abit too much
ktek
post May 17 2016, 04:32 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 03:54 AM)
😊 too many poison in my head now haha hope not burn my pocket out http://vbizz.com/spk51wn-5ch-speaker-packa...alnut-5073.html just saw few 5.1 speakers within my budget mayb abit over 2.5k.. http://vbizz.com/spk160rw-5ch-speaker-package-5071.html searching keep going on...feel like wanna try the floor type 5.1 the Yamaha np40 I think for living room abit small..the spk51 price around rm1500 if i can get a avr for rm1400 it will be around rm2900...most probably will get it on Raya corner..😋
*
8x3 meter quite a medium room. your tv install at long wall or short wall?
for best quality. buy avr with front 3 channel first. not much going on rear spkrs. u need to spare money for cable too (usually not included)

SSJBen
post May 17 2016, 04:57 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 16 2016, 02:09 AM)
RX- V381, 481, 581 & 681 as stated by bro Ben?  brows.gif
*
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 16 2016, 06:35 AM)
Also 781. All with atmos
*
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 17 2016, 03:48 PM)
All with ATMOS? I don't think so.....  confused.gif
*
Only the v581, v681 and v781 will have Atmos and DTSX support.
The v481 and v381 doesn't have Atmos or DTSX, which makes sense because they do have a smaller power supply and driving more than 5 channels will not be a smart thing to do (that's why they only support 5.2).


QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 17 2016, 10:57 AM)
I know that this an old post, but how did you get that promotion price with free headphone & bd player?
Any idea if the promotion is still available? Thanks.
*
Sony KLCC.
That was a few months ago (in Jan IIRC). Definitely promo over already.


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 04:29 PM)
Sure I wont buy from the vbizz 😋 http://vbizz.com/spk160rw-5ch-speaker-package-5071.html
U have seen this speaker u know how much roughly the price is???...but rm1966 abit too much
*
Saw those speakers at Harvey Norman Pavilion. I think they're going for RM2999 or something. The towers are decent, but the center and surround satellites are laughable toys.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: May 17 2016, 04:57 PM
sonerin
post May 17 2016, 06:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 17 2016, 03:48 PM)
All with ATMOS? I don't think so.....  :confused:
*
Yup all new RX is with atmos and some DTS X as well
SSJBen
post May 17 2016, 07:04 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 17 2016, 06:42 PM)
Yup all new RX is with atmos and some DTS X as well
*
No it's not. Only v581, v681 and v781 has Atmos and DTSX.

The v381 and v481 only have 5.2 channel processing, how to have Atmos? sweat.gif
SUSjdgobio
post May 17 2016, 07:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 17 2016, 04:57 PM)
Sony KLCC.
That was a few months ago (in Jan IIRC). Definitely promo over already.
*
Thanks.

Seems like SG already have the new rx x81. Malaysia still no news.
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 07:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(ktek @ May 17 2016, 04:32 PM)
8x3 meter quite a medium room. your tv install at long wall or short wall?
for best quality. buy avr with front 3 channel first. not much going on rear spkrs. u need to spare money for cable too (usually not included)
*
Looks like long wall rite...if can wanna to wall mount it..i will take out the statue

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 17 2016, 07:13 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
sonerin
post May 17 2016, 07:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 17 2016, 07:04 PM)
No it's not. Only v581, v681 and v781 has Atmos and DTSX.

The v381 and v481 only have 5.2 channel processing, how to have Atmos?  sweat.gif
*
My bad. I thought I read in the internet all has it 😜
sonerin
post May 17 2016, 07:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 07:11 PM)
Looks like long wall rite...if can wanna to wall mount it..i will take out the statue
*
Is a bit pack if you wall mount your speaker
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 07:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 17 2016, 04:57 PM)
Only the v581, v681 and v781 will have Atmos and DTSX support.
The v481 and v381 doesn't have Atmos or DTSX, which makes sense because they do have a smaller power supply and driving more than 5 channels will not be a smart thing to do (that's why they only support 5.2).
Sony KLCC.
That was a few months ago (in Jan IIRC). Definitely promo over already.
Saw those speakers at Harvey Norman Pavilion. I think they're going for RM2999 or something. The towers are decent, but the center and surround satellites are laughable toys.
*
Looks expensive over my budget and good beginner model recommendations please...u can see my pic below u cant place floor speaker at front have to put up on my cabinet not looks nice...if can wanna use front wall mount type behind two for surroundings or any other idea...budget around 2k below just for speakers...first I taught to buy Yamaha np40 but I feel its too small...thats the reason I look for other model such spk51..spk51 price at vbizz rm1500 for two tower and surrounds..with limited budget very hard to look around 😋

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 17 2016, 07:31 PM
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 07:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 17 2016, 07:18 PM)
Is a bit pack if you wall mount your speaker
*
Yup but cant do anything any idea...i plan to put dark wallpaper behind so after wall mount those things it wil be looks good
Ngto
post May 17 2016, 07:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 07:11 PM)
Looks like long wall rite...if can wanna to wall mount it..i will take out the statue
*
Your place too cramped. Better stick to Satellite System.
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 07:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(Ngto @ May 17 2016, 07:30 PM)
Your place too cramped. Better stick to Satellite System.
*
Yup..my pic below from the plaster ceiling


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Ngto
post May 17 2016, 07:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 07:41 PM)
Yup..my pic below from the plaster ceiling
*
It's your seating space. Too little space even to move about. You speakers not enough separation space sideways.
SSJBen
post May 17 2016, 08:01 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 07:27 PM)
Looks expensive over my budget and good beginner model recommendations please...u can see my pic below u cant place floor speaker at front have to put up on my cabinet not looks nice...if can wanna use front wall mount type behind two for surroundings or any other idea...budget around 2k below just for speakers...first I taught to buy Yamaha np40 but I feel its too small...thats the reason I look for other model such spk51..spk51 price at vbizz rm1500 for two tower and surrounds..with limited budget very hard to look around 😋
*
With your space, you have 2 choices:

1) Get a satellite based system.
2) Get a pair of bookshelfs.


If I were you, I'd get a pair of good quality small bookshelfs or satellites and an intergrated amp, then call it a day. Then when you have the space, you can move those small bookshelfs for surround duties and get a bigger, higher-end LCR.

Maybe a pair of Q Acoustics 2020 or SVS Prime Satellites would best fit your area.
If you absolutely want to cram in a bookshelf with 5.25" drivers or bigger, then your choices are very limited.

You simply don't have the space to accommodate anything larger. Remember, doesn't mean you have the space to place the speakers, it will work well. You need some space from the boundaries of your wall (back and side), otherwise things will sound boomy, muddy and your soundstage will be limited. If the speakers are vented, you can plug them, but you will need a sub to overcome the loss of low-end. That's another area where you have to find space.

*EDIT*
That floor space infront of your TV is also a big reflection point that you will want to attend to, at least put a rug there.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: May 17 2016, 08:01 PM
Ngto
post May 17 2016, 08:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
The sound will be totally unbalanced. Absolutely no space on the left and free open area on the right, extending towards the back. I suggest better get a HTiB and be done with it smile.gif . Save you a whole lot of money.
TSjovigrunge
post May 17 2016, 09:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 17 2016, 07:04 PM)
No it's not. Only v581, v681 and v781 has Atmos and DTSX.

The v381 and v481 only have 5.2 channel processing, how to have Atmos?  sweat.gif
*
wink3.gif
TSjovigrunge
post May 17 2016, 09:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 17 2016, 07:08 PM)
Thanks.

Seems like SG already have the new rx x81. Malaysia still no news.
*
bangwall.gif
OPT
post May 17 2016, 09:43 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(Ngto @ May 17 2016, 08:11 PM)
The sound will be totally unbalanced. Absolutely no space on the left and free open area on the right, extending towards the back. I suggest better get a HTiB and be done with it  smile.gif . Save you a whole lot of money.
*
I have owned a HTiB, satellites and floorstanding/bookshelf.

HTiB is only slightly better than TV speakers. Satellites plus a sub is few notch better than HTiB.

IMHO, if you are really going for a HTiB, might as well just use the TV speakers.

TSjovigrunge
post May 17 2016, 09:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 07:41 PM)
Yup..my pic below from the plaster ceiling
*
It's very cramped obviously. Forget about floor speakers. A pair of bookshelf speakers provided with a center speaker will do. I have no idea where to put those surround speakers. No space for subwoofer too! I am eager to know the right hand side of your hall. In my opinion that would be a better location. The left side of your current tv location doesn't have any free wide space for the sound. Suddenly I'm thinking of wireless speakers for you! rclxub.gif

Anyway, you have a beautiful tempered glass tv cabinet tho..... thumbsup.gif
TSjovigrunge
post May 17 2016, 09:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(OPT @ May 17 2016, 09:43 PM)
I have owned a HTiB, satellites and floorstanding/bookshelf.

HTiB is only slightly better than TV speakers. Satellites plus a sub is few notch better than HTiB.

IMHO, if you are really going for a HTiB, might as well just use the TV speakers.
*
Anything but HTiB! thumbup.gif
Ngto
post May 17 2016, 10:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(OPT @ May 17 2016, 09:43 PM)
I have owned a HTiB, satellites and floorstanding/bookshelf.

HTiB is only slightly better than TV speakers. Satellites plus a sub is few notch better than HTiB.

IMHO, if you are really going for a HTiB, might as well just use the TV speakers.
*
Then you must have bought a real lousy HTiB that it sounded like TV Speakers thumbup.gif
TSjovigrunge
post May 17 2016, 11:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image

wub.gif
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 11:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(Ngto @ May 17 2016, 07:44 PM)
It's your seating space. Too little space even to move about. You speakers not enough separation space sideways.
*
My house width too bad...now I'm planning to get small L shape sofa and move it abit closer to tv..
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 11:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 17 2016, 08:01 PM)
With your space, you have 2 choices:

1) Get a satellite based system.
2) Get a pair of bookshelfs.
If I were you, I'd get a pair of good quality small bookshelfs or satellites and an intergrated amp, then call it a day. Then when you have the space, you can move those small bookshelfs for surround duties and get a bigger, higher-end LCR.

Maybe a pair of Q Acoustics 2020 or SVS Prime Satellites would best fit your area.
If you absolutely want to cram in a bookshelf with 5.25" drivers or bigger, then your choices are very limited.

You simply don't have the space to accommodate anything larger. Remember, doesn't mean you have the space to place the speakers, it will work well. You need some space from the boundaries of your wall (back and side), otherwise things will sound boomy, muddy and your soundstage will be limited. If the speakers are vented, you can plug them, but you will need a sub to overcome the loss of low-end. That's another area where you have to find space.

*EDIT*
That floor space infront of your TV is also a big reflection point that you will want to attend to, at least put a rug there.
*
QUOTE(Ngto @ May 17 2016, 08:11 PM)
The sound will be totally unbalanced. Absolutely no space on the left and free open area on the right, extending towards the back. I suggest better get a HTiB and be done with it  smile.gif . Save you a whole lot of money.
*
QUOTE(OPT @ May 17 2016, 09:43 PM)
I have owned a HTiB, satellites and floorstanding/bookshelf.

HTiB is only slightly better than TV speakers. Satellites plus a sub is few notch better than HTiB.

IMHO, if you are really going for a HTiB, might as well just use the TV speakers.
*
The svs prime looks nice too...that's the reason I search for htib Sony 9200w it look slim but for my space kinda looks terrible too but after so many poisoning I decide to go with avr...how much is svs prime really suits me I think so...is the sound ok


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 11:21 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(OPT @ May 17 2016, 09:43 PM)
I have owned a HTiB, satellites and floorstanding/bookshelf.

HTiB is only slightly better than TV speakers. Satellites plus a sub is few notch better than HTiB.

IMHO, if you are really going for a HTiB, might as well just use the TV speakers.
*
😋
SSJBen
post May 17 2016, 11:26 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 11:17 PM)
The svs prime looks nice too...that's the reason I search for htib Sony 9200w it look slim but for my space kinda looks terrible too but after so many poisoning I decide to go with avr...how much is svs prime really suits me I think so...is the sound ok
*
SVS Prime Satellites are probably the best satellites I've ever heard. You must mate it with a sub though, on its own it cannot produce much bass.

Other than speakers, you have other issues to attend to first lol... just looking at that pic, the amount of bare walls is a recipe for an insane amount of echo. DIY some acoustic panels with a texture of your choice to go along with your decor, hang it on the left side of the wall. Get a rug, put it on the floor. Those are some starting points.

Of course, it's your house so... don't take my suggestion as something you must do. But my point is, the room is equally as important as speaker choice. You can buy $50,000 speakers but if the room's condition is poor, it's still going to sound like crap.
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 11:26 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 17 2016, 09:57 PM)
It's very cramped obviously. Forget about floor speakers. A pair of bookshelf speakers provided with a center speaker will do. I have no idea where to put those surround speakers. No space for subwoofer too! I am eager to know the right hand side of your hall. In my opinion that would be a better location. The left side of your current tv location doesn't have any free wide space for the sound. Suddenly I'm thinking of wireless speakers for you!  rclxub.gif

Anyway, you have a beautiful tempered glass tv cabinet tho.....  :thumbsup:
*
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 17 2016, 09:59 PM)
Anything but HTiB!  thumbup.gif
*
Yup I think bookshelf type suits me well cant go with with bigger type htib or floor speaker...I bought the cabinet just because its look simple once reach home I realised that the front glass is mirror type...
sivanathan04
post May 17 2016, 11:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 17 2016, 11:26 PM)
SVS Prime Satellites are probably the best satellites I've ever heard. You must mate it with a sub though, on its own it cannot produce much bass.

Other than speakers, you have other issues to attend to first lol... just looking at that pic, the amount of bare walls is a recipe for an insane amount of echo. DIY some acoustic panels with a texture of your choice to go along with your decor, hang it on the left side of the wall. Get a rug, put it on the floor. Those are some starting points.

Of course, it's your house so... don't take my suggestion as something you must do. But my point is, the room is equally as important as speaker choice. You can buy $50,000 speakers but if the room's condition is poor, it's still going to sound like crap.
*
Will go with your suggestion I have no idea on audio related product just start learning...the svs prime satellite a pair 2.5k is it true I just search via google for Malaysia price..i think its really out of my budget..for Q Acoustics 2020i price 1.3k for a pair quite reasonable but still no idea on actual price..for my budget its really hard to invest everything maybe a step by step just help me abit on this...i didn't plan for future upgrades like atmos all with my limited room space..if I go with two bookshelf with a amp now the sound outcome will be ok..i will do the acoustic panels once I bought the speakers...plus where to get the speaker...thank you so much for your kind help

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 18 2016, 01:09 AM


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
TSjovigrunge
post May 18 2016, 12:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 11:30 PM)
Will go with your suggestion I have no idea on audio related product just start learning...the svs prime comes with the 12 inch subwoofer just now I search saw with four book shelf with 12 inch sub looks very nice and small....is it very expensive how much here and where to get it..if expensive I will bought the bookshelf first and sub later but its really look nice the colour suits my cabinet..after bought the speakers then will go with acoustic panels...oh gosh is it just for bookshelf rm2500 just for a pair...i think its really over my budget any other similar type..im now fix with bookshelf speakers just give some idea how many pair I need I think with my limited space I didn't plan for future upgrade maybe like four bookshelf with a sub good for me..thank you so far for your kind help
*
Considering you have limited space, this sample might suit you best. An av receiver, a pair of bookshelf speakers, a center speaker and a subwoofer.
user posted image
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 01:03 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 18 2016, 12:53 AM)
Considering you have limited space, this sample might suit you best. An av receiver, a pair of bookshelf speakers, a center speaker and a subwoofer.
user posted image
*
Looks nice bro yup I just edit my post up there😋..will stick to bookshelf and avr....now have to find which model suits my budget...haha oh my god if I didn't have that limited budget...now have to filter one by one to fit the budget...

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 18 2016, 01:07 AM
TSjovigrunge
post May 18 2016, 01:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 01:03 AM)
Looks nice bro yup I just edit my post up there😋..will stick to bookshelf and avr....now have to find which model suits my budget...haha oh my god if I didn't have that limited budget...now have to filter one by one to fit the budget...
*

You know bro, you will enjoy the movie more with these amazing sound. thumbsup.gif
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 01:28 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 18 2016, 01:20 AM)
You know bro, you will enjoy the movie more with these amazing sound.  :thumbsup:
*
Haha u r correct 😋 now I have to fix which model to buy before bought it next month if not the salesman will confused me out..once fix no more asking salesman opinion 😋...luckily didn't bought the floor speaker from yesterday to many poison in my head if not I have to place the floor speaker on my cabinet....bookshelf looks nice actually....waiting for ssjben recommendations he looks really a pro
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 03:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


How about Sony SSCS5 pair with Sony SSCS8 with a good sub....if I have more budget will add another SSCS5..i don't know about the amp integrated or what..so for cs5 rm700 cs8 rm500 and good sub I didn't have idea on this...and a amp..it will be in my budget...is it a good choice how about the quality...or just drop the plan and go with two q acoustic 2020i with a amp for now later add on center and a sub...or any better idea
sonerin
post May 18 2016, 06:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Should go for q acoustic 3020
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 07:39 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 17 2016, 11:26 PM)
SVS Prime Satellites are probably the best satellites I've ever heard. You must mate it with a sub though, on its own it cannot produce much bass.

Other than speakers, you have other issues to attend to first lol... just looking at that pic, the amount of bare walls is a recipe for an insane amount of echo. DIY some acoustic panels with a texture of your choice to go along with your decor, hang it on the left side of the wall. Get a rug, put it on the floor. Those are some starting points.

Of course, it's your house so... don't take my suggestion as something you must do. But my point is, the room is equally as important as speaker choice. You can buy $50,000 speakers but if the room's condition is poor, it's still going to sound like crap.
*
After some readings about avr and intergrated amp now I get your point..u mean a pair of good bookshelf speaker with intergrated amp and a subwoofer...i get ur point so save space and can get a quality sound its like 2.1 setup...its really a great idea...now I need to know the price roughly for a pair of svs prime or acoustic and for intergrated amp too...sorry for the late pickup and I like the suggestion very much thumbup.gif
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 07:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 18 2016, 06:54 AM)
Should go for q acoustic 3020
*
My budget below 2k for speaker..the 3020 price below 2k or higher....and another 1.5k for amp mayb subwoofer I will add later...
SUSjdgobio
post May 18 2016, 08:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
Any chance of moving your tv cabinet and tv to the left wall? With your new 4k tv you should be sitting closer to the tv anyway. Maybe floorstands will become possible then?
sonerin
post May 18 2016, 09:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 07:42 AM)
My budget below 2k for speaker..the 3020 price below 2k or higher....and another 1.5k for amp mayb subwoofer I will add later...
*
Below 2k
SUSjdgobio
post May 18 2016, 10:07 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 07:42 AM)
My budget below 2k for speaker..the 3020 price below 2k or higher....and another 1.5k for amp mayb subwoofer I will add later...
*
You can also check out used speakers and AVRs which can sometimes give you great value for your money.

One more thing, speakers are a very personal thing. While the recommendations by the sifus here help to narrow down your choices, you should still listen to those speakers yourself and find out whether you like them.

This post has been edited by jdgobio: May 18 2016, 10:33 AM
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 02:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 18 2016, 08:57 AM)
Any chance of moving your tv cabinet and tv to the left wall? With your new 4k tv you should be sitting closer to the tv anyway. Maybe floorstands will become possible then?
*
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 18 2016, 10:07 AM)
You can also check out used speakers and AVRs which can sometimes give you great value for your money.

One more thing, speakers are a very personal thing. While the recommendations by the sifus here help to narrow down your choices, you should still listen to those speakers yourself and find out whether you like them.
*
I don't think so once I move the tv cabinet sure will have more problem with sofa...if I have a good width sure can buy floor stands like that😢....scared to buy used item bro because didn't have experience...plus very hard to find the shop in my area and listen to it...that's why I'm going with sifu suggestion I think their recommendation looks great...im going to bought it at kl...next month I have some work thr so will go around and bought thr easy for me....i like the suggestion a pair of bookshelf speaker with integrated amp and subwoofer..I think with my budget I can get a good pair of bookshelf below 2k then another 1.5k for amp..subwoofer will add later just my idea.
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 02:10 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 18 2016, 09:37 AM)
Below 2k
*
Thank you bro...do you know the svs prime satellite bookshelf price for a pair...I think I'm going to buy bookshelf as a main speaker so have to get abit good sounding speaker
SUSjdgobio
post May 18 2016, 03:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 02:07 PM)
I don't think so once I move the tv cabinet sure will have more problem with sofa...if I have a good width sure can buy floor stands like that😢....scared to buy used item bro because didn't have experience...plus very hard to find the shop in my area and listen to it...that's why I'm going with sifu suggestion I think their recommendation looks great...im going to bought it at kl...next month I have some work thr so will go around and bought thr easy for me....i like the suggestion a pair of bookshelf speaker with integrated amp and subwoofer..I think with my budget I can get a good pair of bookshelf below 2k then another 1.5k for amp..subwoofer will add later just my idea.
*
Ok.
Why not test a few at the shops in KL before deciding which one to go with? Well, its ultimately your choice but be warned that while the suggestion may "look" good to you, it may not "sound" so. Anyway, if you don't test other speakers you will never know what you're missing so that may be a good thing in your case.

Sometimes you will be surprised to find that even a RM900 bookshelf may sound better than a RM2000 one for the simple reason that it sounds better to you although all the professional reviewers rave about the RM2k speakers. At other times the more expensive one sounds only marginally better at which point you need to think whether you're willing to spend double the amount for a marginal difference. The law of diminishing returns applies here.
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 03:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 18 2016, 03:40 PM)
Ok.
Why not test a few at the shops in KL before deciding which one to go with? Well, its ultimately your choice but be warned that while the suggestion may "look" good to you, it may not "sound" so. Anyway, if you don't test other speakers you will never know what you're missing so that may be a good thing in your case.

Sometimes you will be surprised to find that even a RM900 bookshelf may sound better than a RM2000 one for the simple reason that it sounds better to you although all the professional reviewers rave about the RM2k speakers. At other times the more expensive one sounds only marginally better at which point you need to think whether you're willing to spend double the amount for a marginal difference. The law of diminishing returns applies here.
*
Yup will test bro before bought it if i have three brands within the budget will test n decide which bookshelf to choose just need some good models name...ssjben recommend q acoustic 2020i or svs prime..i think the acoustic within my budget svs prime price still don't know yet..sometime too many models also will make us headache just wanna go with sifu recommended brand and will test which suits me between this two
SSJBen
post May 18 2016, 04:19 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 17 2016, 11:30 PM)
Will go with your suggestion I have no idea on audio related product just start learning...the svs prime satellite a pair 2.5k is it true I just search via google for Malaysia price..i think its really out of my budget..for Q Acoustics 2020i price 1.3k for a pair quite reasonable but still no idea on actual price..for my budget its really hard to invest everything maybe a step by step just help me abit on this...i didn't plan for future upgrades like atmos all with my limited room space..if I go with two bookshelf with a amp now the sound outcome will be ok..i will do the acoustic panels once I bought the speakers...plus where to get the speaker...thank you so much for your kind help
*
Prime Satellite pair SRP is RM1.6k, but it can be had cheaper. How much cheaper I'm not sure, because they're affected by currency fluctuation. You need to call Maxx Audio or their other dealers to get the latest price. RM2.5k is the price for the Prime Bookshelfs, different product.

I've always had a soft spot for the Q2020i, I still like it until today. Good little bookshelfs, doesn't cost an arm and a leg. Its bigger brother the Q3020 is even better of course, but I was suggesting the Q2020i because I was under the impression you need it to be under RM2k a pair.



QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 01:28 AM)
Haha u r correct 😋 now I have to fix which model to buy before bought it next month if not the salesman will confused me out..once fix no more asking salesman opinion 😋...luckily didn't bought the floor speaker from yesterday to many poison in my head if not I have to place the floor speaker on my cabinet....bookshelf looks nice actually....waiting for ssjben recommendations he looks really a pro
*
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 03:58 AM)
How about Sony SSCS5 pair with Sony SSCS8 with a good sub....if I have more budget will add another SSCS5..i don't know about the amp integrated or what..so for cs5 rm700 cs8 rm500 and good sub I didn't have idea on this...and a amp..it will be in my budget...is it a good choice how about the quality...or just drop the plan and go with two q acoustic 2020i with a amp for now later add on center and a sub...or any better idea
*
Under RM1k, the SSCS5 bookshelfs are one of the best budget bookshelfs I've heard. IMO, it's better than the very popular Pioneer AJ BS22. That said, stock from Sony is quite limited. You definitely need to place special order with them because AFAIK and have been told, they sell out like fresh goreng pisang the moment new stocks come in. Shouldn't have promoted them that much... tongue.gif

The CS8 center is okay-ish, wouldn't say good. But to my ears, the entire Sony Core Series lineup weak link is the center channel. The towers are great for its price, the bookshelfs are pretty good too, but the center... yeah, in comparison is somewhat of a disappointment. That said, it's RM500 so it's quite cheap and is certainly still better than the muffled Pioneer AJ C22.


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 07:39 AM)
After some readings about avr and intergrated amp now I get your point..u mean a pair of good bookshelf speaker with intergrated amp and a subwoofer...i get ur point so save space and can get a quality sound its like 2.1 setup...its really a great idea...now I need to know the price roughly for a pair of svs prime or acoustic and for intergrated amp too...sorry for the late pickup and I like the suggestion very much thumbup.gif
*
Yes, that's my opinion.
But understand that with most intergrated amps, you're limited to 2 channels (+ a sub). So if you do plan to do 4.1, 5.1 or whatever else, then you'll need a receiver. That said, with your dimensions, it is quite difficult to get an optimal 5.1 surround setup. You can mount the rears on top of your sitting area I guess, but I generally wouldn't suggest it.

I took a look at your pic again and I see that you probably could have a center channel below the TV. If you do get the Sony Core Series which comprises of the CS5 and CS8, I think all you need is a decent budget AVR and you'll be set. I don't think it will sound better than a pair of higher quality bookshelfs though, but if you want 3.1 without going down the HTiB sound quality route, the Sony CS5 + CS8 is a pretty good compromise.

A great quality 2.1 is better than a cheap 5.1. It goes back to the whole HTiB thing, there's a legit reason why most (if not all) of them can't compare to a pair of bookshelfs that cost as much (or slightly more) than a HTiB set.

I don't want to claim that I'm an expert, but I strongly believe that if you want to do surround, do it properly. Otherwise stick with good ol' stereo, you have less headaches, you have great sound quality, and you'll be happy.


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 02:07 PM)
I don't think so once I move the tv cabinet sure will have more problem with sofa...if I have a good width sure can buy floor stands like that😢....scared to buy used item bro because didn't have experience...plus very hard to find the shop in my area and listen to it...that's why I'm going with sifu suggestion I think their recommendation looks great...im going to bought it at kl...next month I have some work thr so will go around and bought thr easy for me....i like the suggestion a pair of bookshelf speaker with integrated amp and subwoofer..I think with my budget I can get a good pair of bookshelf below 2k then another 1.5k for amp..subwoofer will add later just my idea.
*
KLIAV is in July. It won't be representative of what you will hear in your own space, but it should open your ears a bit on what to expect from different speakers. At least it gives you an idea.

dirtrun
post May 18 2016, 04:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Satellite means just tat - small, lite..
Bkshlvs are smallish spkrs but bigger - able to place on a bookshelf..

I personally prefer a bkshlf.. soundwise..
I tink u can still mount a surr to an existing wall [ even if its not equal distance from ur MLP.. ] - its not perfect but itll work..
Of cos, 3.1 is a lot easier ..
I guess its up 2 u.. where theres a will, theres always a way..

Editted to add :
N since u r a beginner n probably dunno wat u like, buyin new is kinda waste - go used ; any decent bkshlv is worth a listen..

D

This post has been edited by dirtrun: May 18 2016, 04:59 PM
sivanathan04
post May 18 2016, 05:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 18 2016, 04:19 PM)
Prime Satellite pair SRP is RM1.6k, but it can be had cheaper. How much cheaper I'm not sure, because they're affected by currency fluctuation. You need to call Maxx Audio or their other dealers to get the latest price. RM2.5k is the price for the Prime Bookshelfs, different product.

I've always had a soft spot for the Q2020i, I still like it until today. Good little bookshelfs, doesn't cost an arm and a leg. Its bigger brother the Q3020 is even better of course, but I was suggesting the Q2020i because I was under the impression you need it to be under RM2k a pair.
Under RM1k, the SSCS5 bookshelfs are one of the best budget bookshelfs I've heard. IMO, it's better than the very popular Pioneer AJ BS22. That said, stock from Sony is quite limited. You definitely need to place special order with them because AFAIK and have been told, they sell out like fresh goreng pisang the moment new stocks come in. Shouldn't have promoted them that much... tongue.gif

The CS8 center is okay-ish, wouldn't say good. But to my ears, the entire Sony Core Series lineup weak link is the center channel. The towers are great for its price, the bookshelfs are pretty good too, but the center... yeah, in comparison is somewhat of a disappointment. That said, it's RM500 so it's quite cheap and is certainly still better than the muffled Pioneer AJ C22.
Yes, that's my opinion.
But understand that with most intergrated amps, you're limited to 2 channels (+ a sub). So if you do plan to do 4.1, 5.1 or whatever else, then you'll need a receiver. That said, with your dimensions, it is quite difficult to get an optimal 5.1 surround setup. You can mount the rears on top of your sitting area I guess, but I generally wouldn't suggest it.

I took a look at your pic again and I see that you probably could have a center channel below the TV. If you do get the Sony Core Series which comprises of the CS5 and CS8, I think all you need is a decent budget AVR and you'll be set. I don't think it will sound better than a pair of higher quality bookshelfs though, but if you want 3.1 without going down the HTiB sound quality route, the Sony CS5 + CS8 is a pretty good compromise.

A great quality 2.1 is better than a cheap 5.1. It goes back to the whole HTiB thing, there's a legit reason why most (if not all) of them can't compare to a pair of bookshelfs that cost as much (or slightly more) than a HTiB set.

I don't want to claim that I'm an expert, but I strongly believe that if you want to do surround, do it properly. Otherwise stick with good ol' stereo, you have less headaches, you have great sound quality, and you'll be happy.
KLIAV is in July. It won't be representative of what you will hear in your own space, but it should open your ears a bit on what to expect from different speakers. At least it gives you an idea.
*
Thank you so much at last I decided I will go with best 2.1 setup...i don't think surround will suits me...A pair of good bookshelf with a intergrated amp...which amp do you recommend bro I'm using for bluray,astro mainly...plus a sub recommendations too if budget got will go with a sub too..for bookshelf I will look for q acoustic and svs will find out where to get cheaper thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 18 2016, 05:01 PM
SSJBen
post May 18 2016, 05:33 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 18 2016, 05:00 PM)
Thank you so much at last I decided I will go with best 2.1 setup...i don't think surround will suits me...A pair of good bookshelf with a intergrated amp...which amp do you recommend bro I'm using for bluray,astro mainly...plus a sub recommendations too if budget got will go with a sub too..for bookshelf I will look for q acoustic and svs will find out where to get cheaper thumbup.gif
*
Decent int. amp without breaking the bank - Yamaha A-S301 perhaps, around RM1.4k or less.
Again, do understand that by going with an int. amp, you're effectively giving up anything more than a 2.1 as an option. Codecs used by blu-ray movies will not be able to be played back in their original state, instead will simply be downmixed into PCM 2.0. Whether that makes a difference, that's an entirely subjective area.

For sub, you have to see where you are going to put it first. Sub placement is the trickiest component to work with. I like to recommend SVS and Rythmik subs, but they are expensive (in bolehland at least). However they blow a lot of those toy subs which cost under RM1k, you know those rubbish subs which has like an amp that crackles under mild pressure or the cabinet resonates like an osim vibrator.

I guess good subs, you want decent price you're gonna have to look at the 2nd hand market. Some I can recommend on a budget would be perhaps the Paradigm PDR80/PDR100, Taga TSW-90, or Sumiko S5. These are subs costing around the RM2k mark or so and they aren't super huge.
With your space, you need to find the dimensions of how big of a sub you can fit at the best possible location first.

Other bookshelfs around RM2k you can research on:

- ELAC Debut B6 (RM1.7k)
- Klipsch RP150 (RM2k)
- Paradigm Atom v7 (RM1.6k)
- Wharfedale Diamond 10.2 (RM1.9k)


These are off the top of my head for bookshelfs under the RM2k budget. I'm sure there's more from Mission, Martin Logan, and so on, but other sifus can chime in.

*EDIT*
The law of diminishing returns in audio is a lot more prevalent than say buying a TV, projector or even a computer. Because our ears don't hear linearly, anything that may sound bad to one may sound like the best thing to another. I mean, we have people buying beats products until today after all.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: May 18 2016, 07:22 PM
ktek
post May 18 2016, 06:03 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
pls dont go the int amp if your main usage in movie. lose the lossless hd audio and surround is not replaceable.
stilo10
post May 18 2016, 06:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
You may check it out on these bookshelfs:

Mission MX1 - RM750
Mission MX2 - RM990
Q Acoustics 2020i - RM1.3k
sonerin
post May 18 2016, 10:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
XLS encore is about RM1.4k as well and is a very good speaker
sivanathan04
post May 19 2016, 06:34 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 18 2016, 04:57 PM)
Satellite means just tat -  small, lite..
Bkshlvs are smallish spkrs but bigger - able to place on a bookshelf..

I personally prefer a bkshlf.. soundwise..
I tink u can still mount a surr to an existing wall [ even if its not equal distance from ur MLP.. ] - its not perfect but itll work..
Of cos, 3.1 is a lot easier ..
I guess its up 2 u.. where theres a will, theres always a way..

Editted to add :
N since u r a beginner n probably dunno wat u like, buyin new is kinda waste - go used ; any decent bkshlv is worth a listen..

D
*
Yup I think I can do a 3.1 also but it wont perfect that's true..just scared to buy used unit that's all didn't have experienced 😋
sivanathan04
post May 19 2016, 06:47 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 18 2016, 05:33 PM)
Decent int. amp without breaking the bank - Yamaha A-S301 perhaps, around RM1.4k or less.
Again, do understand that by going with an int. amp, you're effectively giving up anything more than a 2.1 as an option. Codecs used by blu-ray movies will not be able to be played back in their original state, instead will simply be downmixed into PCM 2.0. Whether that makes a difference, that's an entirely subjective area.

For sub, you have to see where you are going to put it first. Sub placement is the trickiest component to work with. I like to recommend SVS and Rythmik subs, but they are expensive (in bolehland at least). However they blow a lot of those toy subs which cost under RM1k, you know those rubbish subs which has like an amp that crackles under mild pressure or the cabinet resonates like an osim vibrator.

I guess good subs, you want decent price you're gonna have to look at the 2nd hand market. Some I can recommend on a budget would be perhaps the Paradigm PDR80/PDR100,  Taga TSW-90, or Sumiko S5. These are subs costing around the RM2k mark or so and they aren't super huge.
With your space, you need to find the dimensions of how big of a sub you can fit at the best possible location first.

Other bookshelfs around RM2k you can research on:

- ELAC Debut B6 (RM1.7k)
- Klipsch RP150 (RM2k)
- Paradigm Atom v7 (RM1.6k)
- Wharfedale Diamond 10.2 (RM1.9k)
These are off the top of my head for bookshelfs under the RM2k budget. I'm sure there's more from Mission, Martin Logan, and so on, but other sifus can chime in.

*EDIT*
The law of diminishing returns in audio is a lot more prevalent than say buying a TV, projector or even a computer. Because our ears don't hear linearly, anything that may sound bad to one may sound like the best thing to another. I mean, we have people buying beats products until today after all.
*
Nice suggestion bro thumbup.gif How bout the xls encore..after sonerin mention the brand I just look for review not bad price around rm1290..for sub I think the 2k suggestion is good for me svs is too high out of my budget😋..I have some doubt here supposed the intergrated amp sounds good if compare to avr rite but how the hd thingy all like ktek say I have no idea on this....now I have a good suggestion to look for thank you so much thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 19 2016, 07:01 AM
sivanathan04
post May 19 2016, 06:52 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(ktek @ May 18 2016, 06:03 PM)
pls dont go the int amp if your main usage in movie. lose the lossless hd audio and surround is not replaceable.
*
I really didn't have idea on this matter...i understand that if I choose the intergrated amp I have to sacrifice surrounding option but hd audio ?...bro how about the xls encore bookshelf have u test the speaker is it sounds good I read review in the xls thread and found u have comment thr..how about the quality😊 tq for the reply
sivanathan04
post May 19 2016, 06:55 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(stilo10 @ May 18 2016, 06:58 PM)
You may check it out on these bookshelfs:

Mission MX1 - RM750
Mission MX2 - RM990
Q Acoustics 2020i - RM1.3k
*
Thank you for the model bro mission mx2 looks nice too..will look into the model thumbup.gif
sivanathan04
post May 19 2016, 06:59 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 18 2016, 10:11 PM)
XLS encore is about RM1.4k as well and is a very good speaker
*
After u mention this model I start looking for the review...yup the review not bad...did u test the speaker how bout the quality n sound...the speaker outlook also nice seems bigger..price rm1290 not bad actually thumbup.gif
sonerin
post May 19 2016, 07:08 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 19 2016, 06:59 AM)
After u mention this model I start looking for the review...yup the review not bad...did u test the speaker how bout the quality n sound...the speaker outlook also nice seems bigger..price rm1290 not bad actually thumbup.gif
*
Yes did the test before and is absolutely a good speaker and is "buatan Malaysia"
ktek
post May 19 2016, 08:37 AM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 19 2016, 06:52 AM)
I really didn't have idea on this matter...i understand that if I choose the intergrated amp I have to sacrifice surrounding option but hd audio ?...bro how about the xls encore bookshelf have u test the speaker is it sounds good I read review in the xls thread and found u have comment thr..how about the quality😊 tq for the reply
*
HD audio requirement is HDmi port. int amp none. even the optical port decode straight stereo only.
u run surround downmix to stereo, output quality is good, small detail reduced.
no room correction setup like mcacc ypao audyssey to solve ur unequal wall.

playing bd different a lot. downloaded movie may not effected
i went thru this last year.

spk beside brand, we look at the size and bass port direction (front vs rear)
xls use 6.5" wont dissapoint u without subwoofer, becos of limited budget to buy everything in 1 shot.

others 5" are acceptable by tuning eq or room reflection. dont buy 4" totally out of bass kick

This post has been edited by ktek: May 19 2016, 09:27 AM
dirtrun
post May 19 2016, 10:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 19 2016, 06:34 AM)
Yup I think I can do a 3.1 also but it wont perfect that's true..just scared to buy used unit that's all didn't have experienced 😋
*
Spkrs.. unless thrashed real bad can last a long time.. its not a bad decision to get used spkrs.. if u r totally new in tis ; go try out those tat hv been traded in [from d bigger shops] n ask for some form of warranty - at least u knw u can change em if there is a problm once u get home..
Asking for opinions n reading rvws can only go so far becos in de end, u hv to be the one living wif ur decision..
N believe me - if u hv no idea wat u like now ; eventually u would wanna change once u know.. at least if u go 'Used', its not tat painful..
Oso.. in tis case - expensive is not necesarily de best - at least for u..

Spkng thru xperience..
D
ktek
post May 19 2016, 12:47 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 19 2016, 10:37 AM)
Spkng thru xperience..
D
*
same idea. from my 20yrs old british made floorstand spk its remain tough and long service life to go. never fail to impress any audio beginners who come to my house.

basic check is surround ring condition and demo song in low mid loud volume. make sure no funny noise. all screw, nut, jumper link, grill, leg intact and given. outlook can nego if has imperfect.

This post has been edited by ktek: May 19 2016, 01:04 PM
stilo10
post May 19 2016, 01:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Some very good points highlighted by bro dirtrun! If you can wait, why not try to visit this coming 2016 KLIAV show in July and I think most of the av gear that you are considering should be available there and you can auditioned it before buying. You may get some advice from the experts and maybe you can even get a better set that suits your listening environment at the show. Some of the dealers may be selling off some demo units at a very attractive prices during the show. Most likely you be able to find a set that you are interested and at the meantime, you can do some research and survey on those gears of liking before going over!

This post has been edited by stilo10: May 19 2016, 02:35 PM
SSJBen
post May 19 2016, 03:44 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 19 2016, 06:47 AM)
Nice suggestion bro thumbup.gif How bout the xls encore..after sonerin mention the brand I just look for review not bad price around rm1290..for sub I think the 2k suggestion is good for me svs is too high out of my budget😋..I have some doubt here supposed the intergrated amp sounds good if compare to avr rite but how the hd thingy all like ktek say I have no idea on this....now I have a good suggestion to look for thank you so much thumbup.gif
*
Don't have experience with the XLS encore. Just reading opinions and reviews is what I know from them, but if it's one thing everyone agrees is that they do present an exceptional budget-performance value.

In 2 channel mode, an integrated amp is usually going to sound better than an entry level receiver of the same price. How much better is subjective of course. If you're going to do 3.1 (which in your space does seem possible with a bit of squeezing, won't be too bad though), then a receiver is your only route.

If you want good sound over anything else, then the int. amp is the way to go but you do sacrifice some features like DD/DTS decoding, auto room correction, a hub to route all your devices and whatever else.

For around the same price as the Yamaha S301, you can take a look at the Yamaha RX-v379 or the upcoming v381. I can only suggest Yamaha for entry level receivers these days, the budget types from Onkyo and Pioneer has way too many reliability complaints. Denon entry level receivers aren't sold here, so there's that. So don't take it as though I'm a Yamaha fanboy, I'm not.


Blu-Ray discs usually comes with Dolby TrueHD or DTSMA tracks now a days. They are lossless compression codecs, similar in the sense to how FLAC is a lossless compression codec used for music. There has been countless debate on whether people can hear the difference between the older lossy codecs like Dolby Digital or DTS, regularly used during the DVD days. It's a grey area of discussion, only way to hear if there's a difference is that you test it out yourself. I personally can hear a subtle difference between DTS and DTSMA, but I can't tell a single shit of a difference between DD and DTS.

An integrated amp won't be able to decode any of the codecs from Dolby or DTS. So instead, everything will simply be downmixed into PCM 2.0, which is what ALL audio devices must understand.

I believe you could go for an entry level receiver with a 2.0 setup first, add the sub after that then add the center channel later on.

Just a note about center channels though, you'd ideally want it to be tonally matched with your L/R speakers and they should be equal in sound quality output or better.
TSjovigrunge
post May 19 2016, 05:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
At first I thought of getting Yamaha RX-V379, then RX-V479.....after that RX-V579 but now since RX-V81 models will be out soon especially those with Dolby Atmos, I changed my mind again and wait to see what will be the price. AV receiver with Dolby Atmos is for long term. brows.gif

Can you guys see how fickle minded I am? Damn technology! doh.gif
OPT
post May 19 2016, 05:53 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,064 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
Besides Yamaha, Onkyo, Pioneer, Marantz, Denon...no one considered Harman Kardon?

Btw, I'm using an older entry level HK AVR 156. Personally think it's not bad... thumbsup.gif
barjoyai
post May 19 2016, 06:46 PM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



I've been monitoring this thread for quite some time and thanks to all here for the good info. I myself is in my way to upgrade my home theater speakers as I ventured into HT 3, 4 years ago. As we all know that KLIAV 2016 is just around the corner, I would like to have some suggestions and recommendations of speaker packages, so I can have a shortlist of speakers that I can look out during the show. I depend totally on forums and internet review; I bought stuffs based on Whathifi award, LOL. As a beginner myself, now only I realized that center speaker is very important; previously I bought a 3.0 setup with Wharfedale 10.2 and Wharfedale 10cs connected to Yamaha RX-A810. I just bought the center so that i have a center channel and it's cheap, tongue.gif but after times, now I know it lacks clarity and positioning. Now that I have changed the Wharfedale 10.2 to Wharfedale 121, I think they sound worse and is like didn't match each other, sweat.gif
Now that if I have a budget of rm4k-5k for a new left right and center speakers, what good speaker package can I have that can be considered a significant upgrade? i'm thinking of SVS prime/ultra line, B&W 685 series, Q acoustics line (but as far i remembered, they sound a little thin). I am also considering the XLS encore setup but not sure whether it's a good upgrade or not as no place to demo.
sonerin
post May 19 2016, 09:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 19 2016, 06:46 PM)
I've been monitoring this thread for quite some time and thanks to all here for the good info. I myself is in my way to upgrade my home theater speakers as I ventured into HT 3, 4 years ago. As we all know that KLIAV 2016 is just around the corner, I would like to have some suggestions and recommendations of speaker packages, so I can have a shortlist of speakers that I can look out during the show. I depend totally on forums and internet review; I bought stuffs based on Whathifi award, LOL. As a beginner myself, now only I realized that center speaker is very important; previously I bought a 3.0 setup with Wharfedale 10.2 and Wharfedale 10cs connected to Yamaha RX-A810. I just bought the center so that i have a center channel and it's cheap, tongue.gif  but after times, now I know it lacks clarity and positioning. Now that I have changed the Wharfedale 10.2 to Wharfedale 121, I think they sound worse and is like didn't match each other,  sweat.gif
Now that if I have a budget of rm4k-5k for a new left right and center speakers, what good speaker package can I have that can be considered a significant upgrade? i'm thinking of SVS prime/ultra line, B&W 685 series, Q acoustics line (but as far i remembered, they sound a little thin). I am also considering the XLS encore setup but not sure whether it's a good upgrade or not as no place to demo.
*
You can audition q acoustic, XLS and SVS in acoustic system amcorp mall. B&W is in Jaya one. Really should go for a listen than to know.
ktek
post May 19 2016, 10:12 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(OPT @ May 19 2016, 05:53 PM)
Besides Yamaha, Onkyo, Pioneer, Marantz, Denon...no one considered Harman Kardon?

Btw, I'm using an older entry level HK AVR 156. Personally think it's not bad...  :thumbsup:
*
here sifu all big room... will need high power avr to fill up.

QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 19 2016, 06:46 PM)
I've been monitoring this thread for quite some time and thanks to all here for the good info. I myself is in my way to upgrade my home theater speakers as I ventured into HT 3, 4 years ago. As we all know that KLIAV 2016 is just around the corner, I would like to have some suggestions and recommendations of speaker packages, so I can have a shortlist of speakers that I can look out during the show. I depend totally on forums and internet review; I bought stuffs based on Whathifi award, LOL. As a beginner myself, now only I realized that center speaker is very important; previously I bought a 3.0 setup with Wharfedale 10.2 and Wharfedale 10cs connected to Yamaha RX-A810. I just bought the center so that i have a center channel and it's cheap, tongue.gif  but after times, now I know it lacks clarity and positioning. Now that I have changed the Wharfedale 10.2 to Wharfedale 121, I think they sound worse and is like didn't match each other,  sweat.gif
Now that if I have a budget of rm4k-5k for a new left right and center speakers, what good speaker package can I have that can be considered a significant upgrade? i'm thinking of SVS prime/ultra line, B&W 685 series, Q acoustics line (but as far i remembered, they sound a little thin). I am also considering the XLS encore setup but not sure whether it's a good upgrade or not as no place to demo.
*
im one of the mismatch center channel setup. calibrate with manual eq can help. put higher crossover to weakest link. sometimes block the bass port of wharfedale can gain some difference

if wanna upgrade im attracted by bower wilkin and mon audio.
TSjovigrunge
post May 19 2016, 10:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
I can hardly hear people complaint about Yamaha av receivers. cool2.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: May 19 2016, 11:10 PM
barjoyai
post May 19 2016, 10:48 PM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



QUOTE(ktek @ May 19 2016, 10:12 PM)
here sifu all big room... will need high power avr to fill up.
im one of the mismatch center channel setup. calibrate with manual eq can help. put higher crossover to weakest link. sometimes block the bass port of wharfedale can gain some difference

if wanna upgrade im attracted by bower wilkin and mon audio.
*
Hurmm, the left right bookshelf is a down firing bass, while the center is rear ported.
Which b&w series and monitor audio series are u talking about?
I think I remembered hearing the monitor audio silver series 2 years back, I liked its treble, very sparkle
barjoyai
post May 19 2016, 10:50 PM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



QUOTE(sonerin @ May 19 2016, 09:46 PM)
You can audition q acoustic, XLS and SVS in acoustic system amcorp mall. B&W is in Jaya one. Really should go for a listen than to know.
*
Owh, got xls in demo there? Thanks for the info. Anyway, do you have any suggestions?
TSjovigrunge
post May 19 2016, 11:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
I can hardly hear people complaint about Yamaha AV receivers. Yamaha will be my next choice of avr. smile.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: May 19 2016, 11:12 PM
TSjovigrunge
post May 19 2016, 11:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Any Denon avr users here? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by jovigrunge: May 19 2016, 11:13 PM
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 12:51 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 19 2016, 03:44 PM)
Don't have experience with the XLS encore. Just reading opinions and reviews is what I know from them, but if it's one thing everyone agrees is that they do present an exceptional budget-performance value.

In 2 channel mode, an integrated amp is usually going to sound better than an entry level receiver of the same price. How much better is subjective of course. If you're going to do 3.1 (which in your space does seem possible with a bit of squeezing, won't be too bad though), then a receiver is your only route.

If you want good sound over anything else, then the int. amp is the way to go but you do sacrifice some features like DD/DTS decoding, auto room correction, a hub to route all your devices and whatever else.

For around the same price as the Yamaha S301, you can take a look at the Yamaha RX-v379 or the upcoming v381. I can only suggest Yamaha for entry level receivers these days, the budget types from Onkyo and Pioneer has way too many reliability complaints. Denon entry level receivers aren't sold here, so there's that. So don't take it as though I'm a Yamaha fanboy, I'm not.
Blu-Ray discs usually comes with Dolby TrueHD or DTSMA tracks now a days. They are lossless compression codecs, similar in the sense to how FLAC is a lossless compression codec used for music. There has been countless debate on whether people can hear the difference between the older lossy codecs like Dolby Digital or DTS, regularly used during the DVD days. It's a grey area of discussion, only way to hear if there's a difference is that you test it out yourself. I personally can hear a subtle difference between DTS and DTSMA, but I can't tell a single shit of a difference between DD and DTS.

An integrated amp won't be able to decode any of the codecs from Dolby or DTS. So instead, everything will simply be downmixed into PCM 2.0, which is what ALL audio devices must understand.

I believe you could go for an entry level receiver with a 2.0 setup first, add the sub after that then add the center channel later on.

Just a note about center channels though, you'd ideally want it to be tonally matched with your L/R speakers and they should be equal in sound quality output or better.
*
Thanks for the advised bro...will look into the avr model..so many stuff😋 have to learn one by one😋

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 20 2016, 01:08 AM
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 12:52 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 19 2016, 05:22 PM)
At first I thought of getting Yamaha RX-V379, then RX-V479.....after that RX-V579 but now since RX-V81 models will be out soon especially those with Dolby Atmos, I changed my mind again and wait to see what will be the price. AV receiver with Dolby Atmos is for long term.  brows.gif

Can you guys see how fickle minded I am? Damn technology! doh.gif
*
😋
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 12:54 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 19 2016, 06:46 PM)
I've been monitoring this thread for quite some time and thanks to all here for the good info. I myself is in my way to upgrade my home theater speakers as I ventured into HT 3, 4 years ago. As we all know that KLIAV 2016 is just around the corner, I would like to have some suggestions and recommendations of speaker packages, so I can have a shortlist of speakers that I can look out during the show. I depend totally on forums and internet review; I bought stuffs based on Whathifi award, LOL. As a beginner myself, now only I realized that center speaker is very important; previously I bought a 3.0 setup with Wharfedale 10.2 and Wharfedale 10cs connected to Yamaha RX-A810. I just bought the center so that i have a center channel and it's cheap, tongue.gif  but after times, now I know it lacks clarity and positioning. Now that I have changed the Wharfedale 10.2 to Wharfedale 121, I think they sound worse and is like didn't match each other,  sweat.gif
Now that if I have a budget of rm4k-5k for a new left right and center speakers, what good speaker package can I have that can be considered a significant upgrade? i'm thinking of SVS prime/ultra line, B&W 685 series, Q acoustics line (but as far i remembered, they sound a little thin). I am also considering the XLS encore setup but not sure whether it's a good upgrade or not as no place to demo.
*
Xls encore have good review but im having same problem is it a good buy 😋
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 12:56 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 19 2016, 09:46 PM)
You can audition q acoustic, XLS and SVS in acoustic system amcorp mall. B&W is in Jaya one. Really should go for a listen than to know.
*
thumbup.gif will listen to it..many good reviews but they using diff amp to bring good sound from the speaker..i read some from the review

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 20 2016, 01:10 AM
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 01:01 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 19 2016, 07:08 AM)
Yes did the test before and is absolutely a good speaker and is "buatan Malaysia"
*
QUOTE(ktek @ May 19 2016, 08:37 AM)
HD audio requirement is HDmi port. int amp none. even the optical port decode straight stereo only.
u run surround downmix to stereo, output quality is good, small detail reduced.
no room correction setup like mcacc ypao audyssey to solve ur unequal wall.

playing bd different a lot. downloaded movie may not effected
i went thru this last year.

spk beside brand, we look at the size and bass port direction (front vs rear)
xls use 6.5" wont dissapoint u without subwoofer, becos of limited budget to buy everything in 1 shot.

others 5" are acceptable by tuning eq or room reflection. dont buy 4" totally out of bass kick
*
Great info bro...ok if i decide to go with xls which amp is the best to bring out best sound from the speaker..

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 20 2016, 01:07 AM
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 01:05 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 19 2016, 10:37 AM)
Spkrs.. unless thrashed real bad can last a long time.. its not a bad decision to get used spkrs.. if u r totally new in tis ; go try out those tat hv been traded in [from d bigger shops] n ask for some form of warranty - at least u knw u can change em if there is a problm once u get home..
Asking for opinions n reading rvws can only go so far becos in de end, u hv to be the one living wif ur decision..
N believe me - if u hv no idea wat u like now ; eventually u would wanna change once u know.. at least if u go 'Used', its not tat painful..
Oso.. in tis case - expensive is not necesarily de best - at least for u..

Spkng thru xperience..
D
*
QUOTE(ktek @ May 19 2016, 12:47 PM)
same idea. from my 20yrs old british made floorstand spk its remain tough and long service life to go. never fail to impress any audio beginners who come to my house.

basic check is surround ring condition and demo song in low mid loud volume. make sure no funny noise. all screw, nut, jumper link, grill, leg intact and given. outlook can nego if has imperfect.
*
QUOTE(stilo10 @ May 19 2016, 01:23 PM)
Some very good points highlighted by bro dirtrun! If you can wait, why not try to visit this coming 2016 KLIAV show in July and I think most of the av gear that you are considering should be available there and you can auditioned it before buying. You may get some advice from the experts and maybe you can even get a better set that suits your listening environment at the show. Some of the dealers may be selling off some demo units at a very attractive prices during the show. Most likely you be able to find a set that you are interested and at the meantime, you can do some research and survey on those gears of liking before going over!
*
Yup will look for display unit or used item at the shop if can will get some warranty..just scared 😋...thank you bro

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 20 2016, 01:11 AM
ktek
post May 20 2016, 01:22 AM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 20 2016, 01:01 AM)
Great info bro...ok if i decide to go with xls which amp is the best to bring out best sound from the speaker..
*
avr rite?
5 brands pick one. denon pioneer yamaha onkyo marantz.
denon and yamaha quite all rounding from my experience.

ktek
post May 20 2016, 01:27 AM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 19 2016, 10:48 PM)
Hurmm, the left right bookshelf is a down firing bass, while the center is rear ported.
Which b&w series and monitor audio series are u talking about?
I think I remembered hearing the monitor audio silver series 2 years back, I liked its treble, very sparkle
*
was silver rx like the one u auditioned.
now latest model has changed but character not far usually.
SSJBen
post May 20 2016, 01:55 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 19 2016, 05:22 PM)
At first I thought of getting Yamaha RX-V379, then RX-V479.....after that RX-V579 but now since RX-V81 models will be out soon especially those with Dolby Atmos, I changed my mind again and wait to see what will be the price. AV receiver with Dolby Atmos is for long term.  brows.gif

Can you guys see how fickle minded I am? Damn technology! doh.gif
*
Remember, only the v581 and above has Atmos.
Also consider the fact that 5.x.2 Atmos is really only viable in a small room. If you have medium sized room, 5.x.2 isn't immersive enough, even if you have 6.5" wide dispersion drivers as your overheads. That's my IMO at least, having experimented with them.

So, unless you'll always have a small room setup, consider the fact that getting a budget receiver isn't a long term investment.


QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 19 2016, 06:46 PM)
I've been monitoring this thread for quite some time and thanks to all here for the good info. I myself is in my way to upgrade my home theater speakers as I ventured into HT 3, 4 years ago. As we all know that KLIAV 2016 is just around the corner, I would like to have some suggestions and recommendations of speaker packages, so I can have a shortlist of speakers that I can look out during the show. I depend totally on forums and internet review; I bought stuffs based on Whathifi award, LOL. As a beginner myself, now only I realized that center speaker is very important; previously I bought a 3.0 setup with Wharfedale 10.2 and Wharfedale 10cs connected to Yamaha RX-A810. I just bought the center so that i have a center channel and it's cheap, tongue.gif  but after times, now I know it lacks clarity and positioning. Now that I have changed the Wharfedale 10.2 to Wharfedale 121, I think they sound worse and is like didn't match each other,  sweat.gif
Now that if I have a budget of rm4k-5k for a new left right and center speakers, what good speaker package can I have that can be considered a significant upgrade? i'm thinking of SVS prime/ultra line, B&W 685 series, Q acoustics line (but as far i remembered, they sound a little thin). I am also considering the XLS encore setup but not sure whether it's a good upgrade or not as no place to demo.
*
5k isn't enough for an SVS Ultra LCR setup though, they would cost around RM8.5k+ or more. Just a pair of Ultra Bookshelfs, then perhaps.
The SVS Prime Bookshelf + Prime Center on the other hand is possible with a 4-5k setup.

B&W 685 series has always been popular, I'm not exactly sure of the pricing but they are a good choice to check out as well. Some other I can recommend are Klipsch if you like clarity and sparkly trebles, their horn tweeters man... they're good stuff as long as you don't find them fatiguing.

KEF Q series bookshelfs too, they aren't bad. I used to own a pair of Q100 and Q200 as LCR, found them pretty good all rounders for many things but falls short of standing out.

QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 20 2016, 01:01 AM)
Great info bro...ok if i decide to go with xls which amp is the best to bring out best sound from the speaker..
*
As explained, if you only have a budget of an entry-level AVR, go Yamaha. Onkyo and Pioneer are alternatives, but you only need to make 1 search about their reliability reports and you'll understand why they aren't recommended below their high-end stuff.
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 05:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 20 2016, 01:55 AM)
Remember, only the v581 and above has Atmos.
Also consider the fact that 5.x.2 Atmos is really only viable in a small room. If you have medium sized room, 5.x.2 isn't immersive enough, even if you have 6.5" wide dispersion drivers as your overheads. That's my IMO at least, having experimented with them.

So, unless you'll always have a small room setup, consider the fact that getting a budget receiver isn't a long term investment.
5k isn't enough for an SVS Ultra LCR setup though, they would cost around RM8.5k+ or more. Just a pair of Ultra Bookshelfs, then perhaps.
The SVS Prime Bookshelf + Prime Center on the other hand is possible with a 4-5k setup.

B&W 685 series has always been popular, I'm not exactly sure of the pricing but they are a good choice to check out as well. Some other I can recommend are Klipsch if you like clarity and sparkly trebles, their horn tweeters man... they're good stuff as long as you don't find them fatiguing.

KEF Q series bookshelfs too, they aren't bad. I used to own a pair of Q100 and Q200 as LCR, found them pretty good all rounders for many things but falls short of standing out.
As explained, if you only have a budget of an entry-level AVR, go Yamaha. Onkyo and Pioneer are alternatives, but you only need to make 1 search about their reliability reports and you'll understand why they aren't recommended below their high-end stuff.
*
Noted 😋 thank you...one more doubt pre amp is for more better music output its like avr connected to pre amp

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: May 20 2016, 05:20 AM
sonerin
post May 20 2016, 07:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 19 2016, 10:50 PM)
Owh, got xls in demo there? Thanks for the info. Anyway, do you have any suggestions?
*
What's your budget and usage ?
barjoyai
post May 20 2016, 07:40 AM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



QUOTE(sonerin @ May 20 2016, 07:13 AM)
What's your budget and usage ?
*
Budget is around 4k,can go max 5k for speakers. For HT usage only. Planning to add svs pb1000 later on, but not sure whether I should get cheaper speakers and bought the sub within that budget.
barjoyai
post May 20 2016, 07:46 AM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 20 2016, 12:54 AM)
Xls encore have good review but im having same problem is it a good buy 😋
*
Yes that's the thing. If possible, I don't want to pour so much money, lol. For rm2k plus with xls encore, it's definitely a good buy if they can rival the other expensive speakers.
sonerin
post May 20 2016, 08:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 20 2016, 07:40 AM)
Budget is around 4k,can go max 5k for speakers. For HT usage only. Planning to add svs pb1000 later on, but not sure whether I should get cheaper speakers and bought the sub within that budget.
*
If that is the case SVS will be a good choice for HT purpose
bad2928
post May 20 2016, 11:03 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 19 2016, 06:46 PM)
I've been monitoring this thread for quite some time and thanks to all here for the good info. I myself is in my way to upgrade my home theater speakers as I ventured into HT 3, 4 years ago. As we all know that KLIAV 2016 is just around the corner, I would like to have some suggestions and recommendations of speaker packages, so I can have a shortlist of speakers that I can look out during the show. I depend totally on forums and internet review; I bought stuffs based on Whathifi award, LOL. As a beginner myself, now only I realized that center speaker is very important; previously I bought a 3.0 setup with Wharfedale 10.2 and Wharfedale 10cs connected to Yamaha RX-A810. I just bought the center so that i have a center channel and it's cheap, tongue.gif  but after times, now I know it lacks clarity and positioning. Now that I have changed the Wharfedale 10.2 to Wharfedale 121, I think they sound worse and is like didn't match each other,  sweat.gif
Now that if I have a budget of rm4k-5k for a new left right and center speakers, what good speaker package can I have that can be considered a significant upgrade? i'm thinking of SVS prime/ultra line, B&W 685 series, Q acoustics line (but as far i remembered, they sound a little thin). I am also considering the XLS encore setup but not sure whether it's a good upgrade or not as no place to demo.
*
hi bro,i think svs ultra bookshelf is best upgrade from wharfedale,but is out of budget to get matching center together

QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 19 2016, 11:01 PM)
Any Denon avr users here?  hmm.gif
*
denon user here thumbsup.gif
barjoyai
post May 20 2016, 11:37 AM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



QUOTE(bad2928 @ May 20 2016, 11:03 AM)
hi bro,i think svs ultra bookshelf is best upgrade from wharfedale,but is out of budget to get matching center together
denon user here :thumbsup:
*
Thanks for the suggestion, I'm trying to get a very good center channel first as I find my current center is lacking. Then slowly upgrade the left right and adding in sub. I knew the svs ultra bookshelf has many good review and it's not cheap but is the svs ultra center is very good as well for its price?
dirtrun
post May 20 2016, 01:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 20 2016, 05:18 AM)
Noted 😋 thank you...one more doubt pre amp is for more better music output its like avr connected to pre amp
*

Its not all about music..

A pre / processor oso leaves de hard work of powering the spkrs to the power amps.. I run a Marantz 7002 with a Rotel pwr amp n even thou on paper my amp outputs only 100 wts / channel while my supposedly more powerful avr , at [ l tink , forget liao.. ] 130.. my spkrs still sing.. heck l personally tink its more all rounded as in its got more heft at midrange..
Wat l am trying to say is tat avr power figures are best considered wif a grain of salt - power amp figures on the other hand is more trustworthy.. so look for a pre function for ur avr instead of being tied dwn wif one tat is wifout..

smile.gif
D

SSJBen
post May 20 2016, 01:51 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 20 2016, 05:18 AM)
Noted 😋 thank you...one more doubt pre amp is for more better music output its like avr connected to pre amp
*
A pre/pro is simply just that, a pre-amp and processor. It doesn't power the speakers.
An external power amp is usually connected to a pre/pro so that all an amp will do is drive the speakers and nothing else. The pre/pro handles all the signal processing, decoding, video passthrough and so on.

A pre/pro + power amp setup is usually the best way to driver power into the speakers. As already explained by bro dirtrun, the power specs on receivers these days are mostly bs marketing. Receiver companies love to inflate numbers by rating the power handling at ridiculously high THD or at low impedance, and in Onkyo's case, rate it at 1 channel driven because bigger number = better right???!

Then they have all these stupid specs like PMPO or JEITA (yeah Yamaha, looking at you) which makes absolutely zero sense.

At the end of the day, once you get to a certain decent wattage, it is difficult to go higher to get more volume. Example, if a 100w per channel amp can drive a speaker up to 85db output and peaks of 110db, it'll take more than TWICE the power just get another +3db. Volume is not linear, it's logarithmic.

So don't be too invested into the whole power ratings game on receivers. A receiver with 100w into 2 channels at 8ohms, under 0.010% THD isn't going to sound louder at all in comparison to an 80w into 2 channels receiver. 20w is nothing.

The final thing to understand about the power tests done by sites like Sound and Vision. They do full-channel testing which shows certain receivers (particularly Yamaha) having much lower wattage than its competitors. But a full channel test is not a real-world representation of how power is used because there are ZERO movies, games or music that will blast speakers with the same signal for more than a minute. Power is always dynamic, volume is always dynamic.


QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 20 2016, 11:37 AM)
Thanks for the suggestion, I'm trying to get a very good center channel first as I find my current center is lacking. Then slowly upgrade the left right and adding in sub. I knew the svs ultra bookshelf has many good review and it's not cheap but is the svs ultra center is very good as well for its price?
*
The ultra center is as good as the bookshelfs, they are equally matched. Same sized drivers, same refined tweeters, a very decent 4" midrange just for the vocals. Best of all, it adheres to the best center channel design which is a 3-way WTMW, off-axis lobing will not be an issue vs the more common MTM design.

You do however will need a decent amount of space for the ultra center, it's dual ported at the back so you're going to want to have a good 2-3 ft. off the wall. It's also pretty hefty, so the use of sturdy stands are recommended.

That said, why not just get a pair of ultra bookshelfs first? Get the center later. I kidd you not, the ultra bookshelfs to my ears are equal and in some aspects better than more expensive well reknnown bookshelfs like the KEF LS50 or the Sonus Faber Venere 1.5. I've compared them for lengthy periods, I always go back to the ultras at the end, phenomenal speakers.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: May 20 2016, 03:40 PM
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 10:31 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 20 2016, 07:46 AM)
Yes that's the thing. If possible, I don't want to pour so much money, lol. For rm2k plus with xls encore, it's definitely a good buy if they can rival the other expensive speakers.
*
Yup that's true 😋
sivanathan04
post May 20 2016, 10:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 20 2016, 01:28 PM)
Its not all about music..

A pre / processor oso leaves de hard work of powering the spkrs to the power amps.. I run a Marantz 7002 with a Rotel pwr amp n even thou on paper my amp outputs only 100 wts / channel while my supposedly more powerful avr , at [  l tink , forget liao.. ] 130.. my spkrs still sing.. heck l personally tink its more all rounded as in its got more heft at midrange..
Wat l am trying to say is tat avr power figures are best considered wif a grain of salt - power amp figures on the other hand is more trustworthy.. so look for a pre function for ur avr instead of being tied dwn wif one tat is wifout..

smile.gif 
D
*
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 20 2016, 01:51 PM)
A pre/pro is simply just that, a pre-amp and processor. It doesn't power the speakers.
An external power amp is usually connected to a pre/pro so that all an amp will do is drive the speakers and nothing else. The pre/pro handles all the signal processing, decoding, video passthrough and so on.

A pre/pro + power amp setup is usually the best way to driver power into the speakers. As already explained by bro dirtrun, the power specs on receivers these days are mostly bs marketing. Receiver companies love to inflate numbers by rating the power handling at ridiculously high THD or at low impedance, and in Onkyo's case, rate it at 1 channel driven because bigger number = better right???!

Then they have all these stupid specs like PMPO or JEITA (yeah Yamaha, looking at you) which makes absolutely zero sense.

At the end of the day, once you get to a certain decent wattage, it is difficult to go higher to get more volume. Example, if a 100w per channel amp can drive a speaker up to 85db output and peaks of 110db, it'll take more than TWICE the power just get another +3db. Volume is not linear, it's logarithmic.

So don't be too invested into the whole power ratings game on receivers. A receiver with 100w into 2 channels at 8ohms, under 0.010% THD isn't going to sound louder at all in comparison to an 80w into 2 channels receiver. 20w is nothing.

The final thing to understand about the power tests done by sites like Sound and Vision. They do full-channel testing which shows certain receivers (particularly Yamaha) having much lower wattage than its competitors. But a full channel test is not a real-world representation of how power is used because there are ZERO movies, games or music that will blast speakers with the same signal for more than a minute. Power is always dynamic, volume is always dynamic.
The ultra center is as good as the bookshelfs, they are equally matched. Same sized drivers, same refined tweeters, a very decent 4" midrange just for the vocals. Best of all, it adheres to the best center channel design which is a 3-way WTMW, off-axis lobing will not be an issue vs the more common MTM design.

You do however will need a decent amount of space for the ultra center, it's dual ported at the back so you're going to want to have a good 2-3 ft. off the wall. It's also pretty hefty, so the use of sturdy stands are recommended.

That said, why not just get a pair of ultra bookshelfs first? Get the center later. I kidd you not, the ultra bookshelfs to my ears are equal and in some aspects better than more expensive well reknnown bookshelfs like the KEF LS50 or the Sonus Faber Venere 1.5. I've compared them for lengthy periods, I always go back to the ultras at the end, phenomenal speakers.
*
Now I understand very detail... thumbup.gif Thank you ...i will look for Yamaha rx 479 for now
barjoyai
post May 20 2016, 11:32 PM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 20 2016, 01:51 PM)
A pre/pro is simply just that, a pre-amp and processor. It doesn't power the speakers.
An external power amp is usually connected to a pre/pro so that all an amp will do is drive the speakers and nothing else. The pre/pro handles all the signal processing, decoding, video passthrough and so on.

A pre/pro + power amp setup is usually the best way to driver power into the speakers. As already explained by bro dirtrun, the power specs on receivers these days are mostly bs marketing. Receiver companies love to inflate numbers by rating the power handling at ridiculously high THD or at low impedance, and in Onkyo's case, rate it at 1 channel driven because bigger number = better right???!

Then they have all these stupid specs like PMPO or JEITA (yeah Yamaha, looking at you) which makes absolutely zero sense.

At the end of the day, once you get to a certain decent wattage, it is difficult to go higher to get more volume. Example, if a 100w per channel amp can drive a speaker up to 85db output and peaks of 110db, it'll take more than TWICE the power just get another +3db. Volume is not linear, it's logarithmic.

So don't be too invested into the whole power ratings game on receivers. A receiver with 100w into 2 channels at 8ohms, under 0.010% THD isn't going to sound louder at all in comparison to an 80w into 2 channels receiver. 20w is nothing.

The final thing to understand about the power tests done by sites like Sound and Vision. They do full-channel testing which shows certain receivers (particularly Yamaha) having much lower wattage than its competitors. But a full channel test is not a real-world representation of how power is used because there are ZERO movies, games or music that will blast speakers with the same signal for more than a minute. Power is always dynamic, volume is always dynamic.
The ultra center is as good as the bookshelfs, they are equally matched. Same sized drivers, same refined tweeters, a very decent 4" midrange just for the vocals. Best of all, it adheres to the best center channel design which is a 3-way WTMW, off-axis lobing will not be an issue vs the more common MTM design.

You do however will need a decent amount of space for the ultra center, it's dual ported at the back so you're going to want to have a good 2-3 ft. off the wall. It's also pretty hefty, so the use of sturdy stands are recommended.

That said, why not just get a pair of ultra bookshelfs first? Get the center later. I kidd you not, the ultra bookshelfs to my ears are equal and in some aspects better than more expensive well reknnown bookshelfs like the KEF LS50 or the Sonus Faber Venere 1.5. I've compared them for lengthy periods, I always go back to the ultras at the end, phenomenal speakers.
*
Thanks for the input. I'll go and demo the svs ultra later.. Seems like this svs is really an excellent speakers. But I don't have big space for HT, the best I can make is about 1.5 ft off the wall.

This post has been edited by barjoyai: May 20 2016, 11:44 PM
SSJBen
post May 20 2016, 11:56 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 20 2016, 11:32 PM)
Thanks for the input. I'll go and demo the svs ultra later.. Seems like this svs is really an excellent speakers. But I don't have big space for HT, the best I can make is about 1.5 ft off the wall.
*
Should be okay, just crossover higher than the usual 80hz.
LLawliet
post May 21 2016, 01:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Hi all~ smile.gif planning to get myself a sound system mainly for console gaming and movies in a small room...but may shift the audio system to living hall in future to upgrade the audio system furthermore~ My budget around RM2000- RM2500 for now...Any suggestion for any type of audio system? cool2.gif (Planning to get soundbar but scare sound quality may not as good as AVR + speaker and is not upgradable) hmm.gif
sonerin
post May 21 2016, 04:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(LLawliet @ May 21 2016, 01:56 PM)
Hi all~ smile.gif  planning to get myself a sound system mainly for console gaming and movies in a small room...but may shift the audio system to living hall in future to upgrade the audio system furthermore~ My budget around RM2000- RM2500 for now...Any suggestion for any type of audio system? cool2.gif  (Planning to get soundbar but scare sound quality may not as good as AVR + speaker and is not upgradable)  hmm.gif
*
When you say sound quality what exactly you looking for ?
LLawliet
post May 21 2016, 05:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 21 2016, 04:44 PM)
When you say sound quality what exactly you looking for ?
*
Looking for sound quality that can produce better surround and bass and clearer dialogue than general HTIB or soundbar that available in the market? Anything that are suitable for gaming and movie purposes will do... Heard that sony RT-5 is a good option for soundbar? Is AVR will be better since im planning to upgrade it in future~ hmm.gif
sonerin
post May 21 2016, 06:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(LLawliet @ May 21 2016, 05:06 PM)
Looking for sound quality that can produce better surround and bass and clearer dialogue than general HTIB or soundbar that available in the market? Anything that are suitable for gaming and movie purposes will do... Heard that sony RT-5 is a good option for soundbar? Is AVR will be better since im planning to upgrade it in future~  hmm.gif
*
Is better you something now and next time buy new again
ktek
post May 21 2016, 09:01 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(LLawliet @ May 21 2016, 05:06 PM)
Looking for sound quality that can produce better surround and bass and clearer dialogue than general HTIB or soundbar that available in the market? Anything that are suitable for gaming and movie purposes will do... Heard that sony RT-5 is a good option for soundbar? Is AVR will be better since im planning to upgrade it in future~  hmm.gif
*
ok. quite complete info u given. are u running hdmi device?
yes -pick avr and 5"-6" bookshelf stereo spk given ur budget unable to buy center and surround spk at once. dont worry u wont miss them after proper placement and tuning.

no -maybe a mini stereo receiver from cambridge one or denon ceol enough.

both type can add sub in the future.
LLawliet
post May 21 2016, 09:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Yes im running mostly hdmi device~ wink.gif ~ Any recommended bookshelf and avr ? Prefer new models if can biggrin.gif
sonerin
post May 21 2016, 09:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Yamaha coming with new models. Try XLS encore for speaker or q acoustic
sivanathan04
post May 21 2016, 10:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 21 2016, 09:53 PM)
Yamaha coming with new models. Try XLS encore for speaker or q acoustic
*
thumbup.gif
SSJBen
post May 22 2016, 03:19 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(LLawliet @ May 21 2016, 01:56 PM)
Hi all~ smile.gif  planning to get myself a sound system mainly for console gaming and movies in a small room...but may shift the audio system to living hall in future to upgrade the audio system furthermore~ My budget around RM2000- RM2500 for now...Any suggestion for any type of audio system? cool2.gif  (Planning to get soundbar but scare sound quality may not as good as AVR + speaker and is not upgradable)  hmm.gif
*
Get a pair of Sony SSCS5 + Yamaha RX v381 = RM2098.
If you have space, get the CS3 floorstanders instead.

Bass won't be plentiful, maybe even weak or just enough depending on your room. A decent sub costs upwards of RM1.5k and above, most subs below that are rubbish.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: May 22 2016, 03:21 PM
LLawliet
post May 22 2016, 04:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 22 2016, 03:19 PM)
Get a pair of Sony SSCS5 + Yamaha RX v381 = RM2098.
If you have space, get the CS3 floorstanders instead.

Bass won't be plentiful, maybe even weak or just enough depending on your room. A decent sub costs upwards of RM1.5k and above, most subs below that are rubbish.
*
Thanks for your input ~ I will get a decent sub in future probably~ What's your recommendation sub's that are decent currently?~ And is Sony SSCS5 or XLS-Encore better?
sonerin
post May 22 2016, 07:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(LLawliet @ May 22 2016, 04:28 PM)
Thanks for your input ~ I will get a decent sub in future probably~ What's your recommendation sub's that are decent currently?~ And is Sony SSCS5 or XLS-Encore better?
*
XLS
TSjovigrunge
post May 22 2016, 08:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 22 2016, 03:19 PM)
Get a pair of Sony SSCS5 + Yamaha RX v381 = RM2098.
If you have space, get the CS3 floorstanders instead.

Bass won't be plentiful, maybe even weak or just enough depending on your room. A decent sub costs upwards of RM1.5k and above, most subs below that are rubbish.
*
All the RX V81s price already out, Ben? ohmy.gif
sonerin
post May 22 2016, 09:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 22 2016, 08:17 PM)
All the RX V81s price already out, Ben?  ohmy.gif
*
You can call Yamaha Malaysia to find out
sivanathan04
post May 23 2016, 12:32 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 22 2016, 03:19 PM)
Get a pair of Sony SSCS5 + Yamaha RX v381 = RM2098.
If you have space, get the CS3 floorstanders instead.

Bass won't be plentiful, maybe even weak or just enough depending on your room. A decent sub costs upwards of RM1.5k and above, most subs below that are rubbish.
*
thumbup.gif Any major differences between Yamaha rx v379 and rx v381...looks like the 4k hdr and hdmi new in 381...how bout the sound bro
SSJBen
post May 23 2016, 12:32 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(LLawliet @ May 22 2016, 04:28 PM)
Thanks for your input ~ I will get a decent sub in future probably~ What's your recommendation sub's that are decent currently?~ And is Sony SSCS5 or XLS-Encore better?
*
I have no experience with the XLS encore, so I can't compre. That said, the Sony Core Series speakers do present some of the best value for perforamnce in speakers on the market today, that much I can claim without a doubt.


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 22 2016, 08:17 PM)
All the RX V81s price already out, Ben?  ohmy.gif
*
Not out yet, I was basing the price on last year's SRP. Yamaha haven't really changed their SRP prices since the ringgit became shit.


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ May 23 2016, 12:32 AM)
thumbup.gif Any major differences between Yamaha rx v379 and rx v381...looks like the 4k hdr and hdmi new in 381...how bout the sound bro
*
No, other than the inclusion of HDR support, 4k60hz at 4:4:4 and perhaps some geeral fixes, pretty much the same stuff hardware wise. Same power supply, same transformer, same amps. It's a good thing though I suppose, don't fix what isn't broken. The 379 was the most reliable entry level receiver last year, for a good reason.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: May 23 2016, 12:35 AM
sivanathan04
post May 23 2016, 12:33 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 22 2016, 08:17 PM)
All the RX V81s price already out, Ben?  ohmy.gif
*
Have to look for the new price 👌
SUSjdgobio
post May 23 2016, 11:03 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
Why is there no love for the Tannoy V1 / V1i bookshelf speakers?
It's only RM900 per pair and IMO its great value for money.
I really love the sound signature especially for music. Should do great for movies too as the drivers are the same as the ones in the V4 floorstanders which are great for HT.

I think Tannoy speakers provide great value for the price. Only downside is the local distributor.
SSJBen
post May 23 2016, 03:00 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 23 2016, 11:03 AM)
Why is there no love for the Tannoy V1 / V1i bookshelf speakers?
It's only RM900 per pair and IMO its great value for money.
I really love the sound signature especially for music. Should do great for movies too as the drivers are the same as the ones in the V4 floorstanders which are great for HT.

I think Tannoy speakers provide great value for the price. Only downside is the local distributor.
*
@bolded
You answered your question.
SUSjdgobio
post May 23 2016, 03:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 23 2016, 03:00 PM)
@bolded
You answered your question.
*
I saw that one coming biggrin.gif
Those guys at Unicorn Electronics are really spoiling the brand here in Malaysia.

Harvey Norman carry some Tannoy models, maybe possible to order through them though I'm sure they get it from the distributors as well. Recently saw them having some DC6 bookshelf speakers and TS2.10 sub on clearance sale.
Didn't have time to check further that day.

This post has been edited by jdgobio: May 23 2016, 03:39 PM
TSjovigrunge
post May 23 2016, 05:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 23 2016, 11:03 AM)
Why is there no love for the Tannoy V1 / V1i bookshelf speakers?
It's only RM900 per pair and IMO its great value for money.
I really love the sound signature especially for music. Should do great for movies too as the drivers are the same as the ones in the V4 floorstanders which are great for HT.

I think Tannoy speakers provide great value for the price. Only downside is the local distributor.
*
user posted image
SUSjdgobio
post May 23 2016, 05:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 23 2016, 05:38 PM)
user posted image
*
Yours? Nice smile.gif
sivanathan04
post May 23 2016, 06:14 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 23 2016, 12:32 AM)
I have no experience with the XLS encore, so I can't compre. That said, the Sony Core Series speakers do present some of the best value for perforamnce in speakers on the market today, that much I can claim without a doubt.
Not out yet, I was basing the price on last year's SRP. Yamaha haven't really changed their SRP prices since the ringgit became shit.
No, other than the inclusion of HDR support, 4k60hz at 4:4:4 and perhaps some geeral fixes, pretty much the same stuff hardware wise. Same power supply, same transformer, same amps. It's a good thing though I suppose, don't fix what isn't broken. The 379 was the most reliable entry level receiver last year, for a good reason.
*
thumbup.gif
sivanathan04
post May 23 2016, 06:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 23 2016, 11:03 AM)
Why is there no love for the Tannoy V1 / V1i bookshelf speakers?
It's only RM900 per pair and IMO its great value for money.
I really love the sound signature especially for music. Should do great for movies too as the drivers are the same as the ones in the V4 floorstanders which are great for HT.

I think Tannoy speakers provide great value for the price. Only downside is the local distributor.
*
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 23 2016, 05:38 PM)
user posted image
*
Looks nice thumbup.gif
ktek
post May 23 2016, 07:07 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
given main cone size. the 6.5" xls will win all of them without a subwoofer installed
SSJBen
post May 23 2016, 08:04 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 23 2016, 03:34 PM)
I saw that one coming  biggrin.gif
Those guys at Unicorn Electronics are really spoiling the brand here in Malaysia.

Harvey Norman carry some Tannoy models, maybe possible to order through them though I'm sure they get it from the distributors as well. Recently saw them having some DC6 bookshelf speakers and TS2.10 sub on clearance sale.
Didn't have time to check further that day.
*
Exactly~~!
I do wish there are more budget orientated speakers here with good support, and without dipping down into those that sound like sewage.

There are so many speakers I want to recommend, but getting them here means importing. Chane has some fantastic speakers, Ascend Acoustics too, all without breaking the bank.
SUSjdgobio
post May 23 2016, 09:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 23 2016, 08:04 PM)
Exactly~~!
I do wish there are more budget orientated speakers here with good support, and without dipping down into those that sound like sewage.

There are so many speakers I want to recommend, but getting them here means importing. Chane has some fantastic speakers, Ascend Acoustics too, all without breaking the bank.
*
I guess the market is just too small here to have a good variety. But on the bright side I do see things changing. More people are into good quality portable audio, they will eventually move to home audio. We are also getting more variety now compared to 15 years ago but still very small when compared to developed countries.
TSjovigrunge
post May 23 2016, 09:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 23 2016, 05:54 PM)
Yours? Nice  smile.gif
*
Not mine. Random photo search for all our buddies here. blush.gif
sonerin
post May 23 2016, 09:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 23 2016, 09:06 PM)
I guess the market is just too small here to have a good variety. But on the bright side I do see things changing. More people are into good quality portable audio, they will eventually move to home audio. We are also getting more variety now compared to 15 years ago but still very small when compared to developed countries.
*
Also buying power in Malaysia is limited.
SUSjdgobio
post May 24 2016, 09:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 23 2016, 09:21 PM)
Not mine. Random photo search for all our buddies here.  blush.gif
*
Oh I see biggrin.gif

The one in your picture is the V1. The newer one is called V1i it comes with magnesium-aluminium alloy tweeters which goes up to 53kHz. The only visible difference is the tweeter shield and the colour of the tweeters - see picture below:

user posted image

This post has been edited by jdgobio: May 24 2016, 09:28 AM
SSJBen
post May 24 2016, 12:50 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Going to listen to a pair of Klipsch RF-7 II this weekend. Can't wait.
sonerin
post May 24 2016, 01:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 24 2016, 12:50 PM)
Going to listen to a pair of Klipsch RF-7 II this weekend. Can't wait.
*
I thought you don't like klipsch
ktek
post May 24 2016, 01:55 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 24 2016, 01:34 PM)
I thought you don't like klipsch
*
i dont like klipsch
LLawliet
post May 24 2016, 01:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Any ideas when Yamaha V381 will arrive Malaysia? Where can get it best deal online biggrin.gif?
SSJBen
post May 24 2016, 02:57 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 24 2016, 01:34 PM)
I thought you don't like klipsch
*
I'm okay with it, not don't like. The only Klipsch system I heard was the RF52 setup and that was with only 1 movie. Can't draw a conclusion at all.
sonerin
post May 24 2016, 03:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 24 2016, 02:57 PM)
I'm okay with it, not don't like. The only Klipsch system I heard was the RF52 setup and that was with only 1 movie. Can't draw a conclusion at all.
*
✌️
SUSjdgobio
post May 24 2016, 05:50 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 23 2016, 09:40 PM)
Also buying power in Malaysia is limited.
*
True and it just became worse this past year sad.gif
sonerin
post May 24 2016, 05:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jdgobio @ May 24 2016, 05:50 PM)
True and it just became worse this past year  sad.gif
*
Lots of people holding back on buying item which consider luxury to have
frontier008
post May 25 2016, 11:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: May 2006


Guys... i would like to know what is the differences between AV receiver and amplifiers?

In which situation that i need receiver or amplifier in my home entertainment setup?
ktek
post May 25 2016, 01:21 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(frontier008 @ May 25 2016, 11:42 AM)
Guys... i would like to know what is the differences between AV receiver and amplifiers?

In which situation that i need receiver or amplifier in my home entertainment setup?
*
amplifier got a few type.
power amp. just 1 function to produce power for spk. separate volume control (preamp) required

integrated amp. power amp +volume control +input selector.
some support usb dac from computer.

av receiver. power amp +vol +input + audio decode +video switching.
now has hdmi, network, usb port
sonerin
post May 25 2016, 05:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(frontier008 @ May 25 2016, 11:42 AM)
Guys... i would like to know what is the differences between AV receiver and amplifiers?

In which situation that i need receiver or amplifier in my home entertainment setup?
*
For a simple home theater setup just need avr and speakers + sub.
barjoyai
post May 26 2016, 03:19 PM

PoisonRoses
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



Hi again, just a quick question. Is it advisable to use similar speakers for LCR channel? As I browse the net, I found out that many argue reg the horizontally positioned MTM center channel is not the best. How about 3 similar 2 way bookshelf? Any thoughts?
ktek
post May 26 2016, 04:00 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 26 2016, 03:19 PM)
Hi again, just a quick question. Is it advisable to use similar speakers for LCR channel? As I browse the net, I found out that many argue reg the horizontally positioned MTM center channel is not the best.  How about 3 similar 2 way bookshelf?  Any thoughts?
*
can. as long not blocking ur tv screen.
best i saw use floor stand as center
SSJBen
post May 26 2016, 05:05 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(barjoyai @ May 26 2016, 03:19 PM)
Hi again, just a quick question. Is it advisable to use similar speakers for LCR channel? As I browse the net, I found out that many argue reg the horizontally positioned MTM center channel is not the best.  How about 3 similar 2 way bookshelf?  Any thoughts?
*
If it has to be horizontal, try and avoid MTM designs. Then again, it really only matters if your sitting positions are like more than 30 degrees off axis. Those in the middle wouldn't be affected by lobing issues. WTMW designs are almost always better.

The best is to have 3 identical towers (or bookshelfs if you can't have towers) behind an acoustically invincible screen, the tweeter being just a couple inches above sitting ear height, generally.
capoi
post May 26 2016, 11:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


Hi All,

Please enlighten me with a silly question. Does AVR support FM receiver? Currently using HTiB which have FM Receiver. I have a target to buy an AVR maybe in two years from now.

Another question, regarding subwoofer I just read and found out there's a various design of subwoofer. The type i read was downfire cabinet. What do you guys think of this design. Is it better when the subwoofer pump out the sound to the floor?
sonerin
post May 27 2016, 07:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(capoi @ May 26 2016, 11:26 PM)
Hi All,

Please enlighten me with a silly question. Does AVR support FM receiver? Currently using HTiB which have FM Receiver. I have a target to buy an AVR maybe in two years from now.

Another question, regarding subwoofer I just read and found out there's a various design of subwoofer. The type i read was downfire cabinet. What do you guys think of this design. Is it better when the subwoofer pump out the sound to the floor?
*
Most AVR have FM tuner but 2 years later we all can't tell. Different design of subwoofer is for different purpose. Some more suitable for movie and some more suitable for music
dirtrun
post May 27 2016, 08:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
The Receiver in Audio Video Receiver is supposed to be a FM receiver..

Subwoofer design is the least of your worries..
I hv a sealed Rythmik F15 - front firing and an ol SvS PB12+ - downfiring one and they sound a tad different but not to the extent tat it matters even if l use both together..
Personally room modes and subwoofer positioning should be more of a concern..

biggrin.gif
D
_gearbox_
post May 27 2016, 08:42 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


hey guys.. not too sure if the Yamaha 379 or up coming 381 AV receiver could drive an old pair of speakers in my current setup to replace an aging receiver.. Quad 22L2
TSjovigrunge
post May 27 2016, 01:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
user posted image

A/V Receiver

Yamaha A/V Receiver *RX-V381*

5-channel 500W = 100W x 5 (6 ohms, 1 kHz, 0.9 % THD)
Bluetooth for wireless music streaming
HDMI with HDCP2.2 (4 in/1 out)
4K Ultra HD pass-through (HDCP2.2/4K60p)

A/V Receiver with a 1 year agent warranty, made in Malaysia !!!!

FREE DELIVERY IN SINGAPORE !!!!

•What Hi-Fi Awards`2015 *****

"A superb budget amp, Yamaha’s entry-level receiver is a great way to delve into home cinema." "Best home cinema amplifier under £350"

The RXV381 is the entry-level AV receiver from Yamaha's RXV81 range. It's a great introduction to home cinema, boasting 5 channels, 4 future-proof HDMI inputs with 4K Ultra HD pass-through support, Bluetooth wireless streaming and a host of handy audio features, delivering a hugely enjoyable home cinema experience at a price that won't break the bank.

Yamaha's Virtual CINEMA DSP helps to reproduce a virtual surround sound without the need for rear satellite speakers. While with Virtual CINEMA FRONT, an additional pair of surrounds can be placed at the front as well, allowing you to simplify the layout of your room for a great deal more flexibility. Yamaha's exclusive 'Extra Bass' technology also manages to enhance the lower frequencies of your satellites and subwoofer for a richer and more powerful bass performance.

The RXV381 also features Yamaha's sophisticated YPAO multi-point room calibration system, with a microphone to measure all the speakers in your room and adjust output for the best sound. All of these features ensure the Yamaha RXV381 delivers film soundtracks with authority and detail and the natural sound that we've come to expect from Yamaha receivers. Sound field programs mimic multiple music venues, bringing extra atmosphere to games or giving movies the sound the director intended for cinema viewing.

Bluetooth technology is now included for wireless music playback from your smart device with the Yamaha Compressed Music Enhancer optimised for vivid, lively wireless sound quality. A USB port can also be found on the front panel for easy and direct digital iPod/iPhone connectivity or playback of music files letting you fully enjoy your home theatre with simplicy and ease.

Representing outstanding value for money, the RXV381 delivers all the video and audio processing prowess needed to take that first leap into home cinema.

•Channel - 5.1
•Rated Output Power (1kHz, 1ch driven) - 100W (4ohms, 0.9% THD)
•Rated Output Power (20Hz-20kHz, 2ch driven) - 70W (8ohms, 0.09% THD)
•Maximum Effective Output Power (1kHz, 1ch driven) (JEITA) - 135W
•Dynamic Power per Channel (8/6/4/2 ohms) - -/110/130/150W
•CINEMA DSP - Yes
•DSP Programs - 17
•Compressed Music Enhancer - Yes(incl. enhancer for Bluetooth)
•SILENT CINEMA / Virtual CINEMA DSP - Yes(Virtual CINEMA FRONT)
•Dolby TrueHD - Yes
•Dolby Digital Plus - Yes
•DTS-HD Master Audio - Yes
•YPAO sound optimization - Yes
•Adaptive DRC (Dynamic Range Control) - Yes
•Initial Volume & Maximum Volume Setting - Yes
•Audio Delay - Yes (0-500 ms)
•192kHz/24-bit DACs for all channels - Yes (Burr-Brown)
•4K Ultra HD passthrough - Yes
•HDMI 3D passthrough - Yes
•HDMI Audio Return Channel - Yes
•Deep Color/x.v.Color/24Hz Refresh Rate /Auto Lip-Sync - Yes
•HDMI Input/Output - 4 / 1 (HDCP2.2, HDR and BT.2020 compatible)
•HDMI CEC - Yes
•USB Input - USB Memory, Portable Audio Player
•Bluetooth - Yes (SBC)
•Front AV Input - USB/Mini Jack
•Digital Audio Input/Output: Optical - 1 / 0
•Digital Audio Input/Output: Coaxial - 2 / 0
•Analog Audio Input/Output - 3 (front 1) / 1
•Composite Video Input/Output - 3 / 1
•Preout - SW
•Headphone Output - 1
•FM/AM Tuner - Yes
•On-screen display - Yes
•SCENE - SCENE (4 sets)
•Remote Control Unit - Yes
•Standby Power Consumption (IR only) - ≤0.3W
•Auto Power Down - Yes
•ECO mode - Yes
•Dimensions (W x H x D) - 435 x 151 x 315 mm
•Weight - 7.4 kg
•Finish: Black

Yamaha A/V Receiver *RX-V381* = S$599.00 S$569

So Singapore price is S$569 after discount. Malaysia price roughly will be ............... shocking.gif



sonerin
post May 27 2016, 03:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 27 2016, 01:13 PM)
user posted image

A/V Receiver

Yamaha A/V Receiver *RX-V381* 

5-channel 500W = 100W x 5 (6 ohms, 1 kHz, 0.9 % THD)
Bluetooth for wireless music streaming
HDMI with HDCP2.2 (4 in/1 out)
4K Ultra HD pass-through (HDCP2.2/4K60p)

A/V Receiver with a 1 year agent warranty, made in Malaysia !!!!

FREE DELIVERY IN SINGAPORE !!!!

•What Hi-Fi Awards`2015 *****

"A superb budget amp, Yamaha’s entry-level receiver is a great way to delve into home cinema." "Best home cinema amplifier under £350"

The RXV381 is the entry-level AV receiver from Yamaha's RXV81 range. It's a great introduction to home cinema, boasting 5 channels, 4 future-proof HDMI inputs with 4K Ultra HD pass-through support, Bluetooth wireless streaming and a host of handy audio features, delivering a hugely enjoyable home cinema experience at a price that won't break the bank.

Yamaha's Virtual CINEMA DSP helps to reproduce a virtual surround sound without the need for rear satellite speakers. While with Virtual CINEMA FRONT, an additional pair of surrounds can be placed at the front as well, allowing you to simplify the layout of your room for a great deal more flexibility. Yamaha's exclusive 'Extra Bass' technology also manages to enhance the lower frequencies of your satellites and subwoofer for a richer and more powerful bass performance.

The RXV381 also features Yamaha's sophisticated YPAO multi-point room calibration system, with a microphone to measure all the speakers in your room and adjust output for the best sound. All of these features ensure the Yamaha RXV381 delivers film soundtracks with authority and detail and the natural sound that we've come to expect from Yamaha receivers. Sound field programs mimic multiple music venues, bringing extra atmosphere to games or giving movies the sound the director intended for cinema viewing.

Bluetooth technology is now included for wireless music playback from your smart device with the Yamaha Compressed Music Enhancer optimised for vivid, lively wireless sound quality. A USB port can also be found on the front panel for easy and direct digital iPod/iPhone connectivity or playback of music files letting you fully enjoy your home theatre with simplicy and ease.

Representing outstanding value for money, the RXV381 delivers all the video and audio processing prowess needed to take that first leap into home cinema.

•Channel - 5.1
•Rated Output Power (1kHz, 1ch driven) - 100W (4ohms, 0.9% THD)
•Rated Output Power (20Hz-20kHz, 2ch driven) - 70W (8ohms, 0.09% THD)
•Maximum Effective Output Power (1kHz, 1ch driven) (JEITA) - 135W
•Dynamic Power per Channel (8/6/4/2 ohms) - -/110/130/150W
•CINEMA DSP - Yes
•DSP Programs - 17
•Compressed Music Enhancer - Yes(incl. enhancer for Bluetooth)
•SILENT CINEMA / Virtual CINEMA DSP - Yes(Virtual CINEMA FRONT)
•Dolby TrueHD - Yes
•Dolby Digital Plus - Yes
•DTS-HD Master Audio - Yes
•YPAO sound optimization - Yes
•Adaptive DRC (Dynamic Range Control) - Yes
•Initial Volume & Maximum Volume Setting - Yes
•Audio Delay - Yes (0-500 ms)
•192kHz/24-bit DACs for all channels - Yes (Burr-Brown)
•4K Ultra HD passthrough - Yes
•HDMI 3D passthrough - Yes
•HDMI Audio Return Channel - Yes
•Deep Color/x.v.Color/24Hz Refresh Rate /Auto Lip-Sync - Yes
•HDMI Input/Output - 4 / 1 (HDCP2.2, HDR and BT.2020 compatible)
•HDMI CEC - Yes
•USB Input - USB Memory, Portable Audio Player
•Bluetooth - Yes (SBC)
•Front AV Input - USB/Mini Jack
•Digital Audio Input/Output: Optical - 1 / 0
•Digital Audio Input/Output: Coaxial - 2 / 0
•Analog Audio Input/Output - 3 (front 1) / 1
•Composite Video Input/Output - 3 / 1
•Preout - SW
•Headphone Output - 1
•FM/AM Tuner - Yes
•On-screen display - Yes
•SCENE - SCENE (4 sets)
•Remote Control Unit - Yes
•Standby Power Consumption (IR only) - ≤0.3W
•Auto Power Down - Yes
•ECO mode - Yes
•Dimensions (W x H x D) - 435 x 151 x 315 mm
•Weight - 7.4 kg
•Finish: Black

Yamaha A/V Receiver *RX-V381* =  S$599.00 S$569 

So Singapore price is S$569 after discount. Malaysia price roughly will be ...............  shocking.gif
*
my guess is RM1600
capoi
post May 27 2016, 03:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 27 2016, 08:13 AM)
The Receiver in Audio Video Receiver is supposed to be a FM receiver..

Subwoofer design is the least of your worries..
I hv a sealed Rythmik F15 - front firing and an ol SvS PB12+ - downfiring one and they sound a tad different but not to the extent tat it matters even if l use both together..
Personally room modes and subwoofer positioning should be more of a concern..

biggrin.gif
D
*
I thought i used a wrong word. FM tuner is the correct word that I'm suppose to use.
ktek
post May 27 2016, 04:11 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(capoi @ May 27 2016, 03:01 PM)
I thought i used a wrong word. FM tuner is the correct word that I'm suppose to use.
*
dont worry. got fm radio tuner.
but future may switch to internet stream liao
TSjovigrunge
post May 27 2016, 04:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 27 2016, 03:00 PM)
my guess is RM1600
*

Yup roughly. Currently the cheapest for RX-V379 was around RM1399 if not mistaken. hmm.gif
sonerin
post May 27 2016, 05:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 27 2016, 04:55 PM)
Yup roughly. Currently the cheapest for RX-V379 was around RM1399 if not mistaken.  hmm.gif
*
Is reasonable price
SSJBen
post May 27 2016, 06:10 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(capoi @ May 26 2016, 11:26 PM)
Hi All,

Please enlighten me with a silly question. Does AVR support FM receiver? Currently using HTiB which have FM Receiver. I have a target to buy an AVR maybe in two years from now.

Another question, regarding subwoofer I just read and found out there's a various design of subwoofer. The type i read was downfire cabinet. What do you guys think of this design. Is it better when the subwoofer pump out the sound to the floor?
*
As bro dirtrun already explained, sub designs don't actually sound a whole lot different from one another. They aren't tweeters, which are instantly noticeable from one design to the other.

The most important thing when choosing a sub is:

1) The placement of it (this is CRITICAL)
2) How big your space is
3) How many are you putting in the room

Ported subs will always have higher SPL than sealed subs. Doesn't matter where the driver is placed, front firing, down firing, side firing or upside down firing. Bass waves are mostly omni directional, where under 20hz you won't hear bass anymore instead you will FEEL them.

Generally people believe that sealed subs will sound more accurate than ported subs. Where ported subs will sound "slow or sloppy", uncontrolled. That's true for the toy subs made by joke companies like logitech or edifier or some "insert cool x name here" brand.


QUOTE(_gearbox_ @ May 27 2016, 08:42 AM)
hey guys.. not too sure if the Yamaha 379 or up coming 381 AV receiver could drive an old pair of speakers in my current setup to replace an aging receiver.. Quad 22L2
*
I don't see why not, even though your Quads are low sensitivity.

TSjovigrunge
post May 27 2016, 06:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 27 2016, 05:00 PM)
Is reasonable price
*
Pretty much the same except in the RX-V481 series it include HDR support, 4k60hz at 4:4:4 smile.gif
sonerin
post May 27 2016, 06:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 27 2016, 06:12 PM)
Pretty much the same except in the RX-V481 series it include HDR support, 4k60hz at 4:4:4  smile.gif
*
It does have atmos too
TSjovigrunge
post May 27 2016, 07:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 27 2016, 06:37 PM)
It does have atmos too
*
Nope! 381 and 481 doesn't have ATMOS. Only 581 & above does include ATMOS. cool2.gif
capoi
post May 27 2016, 07:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 27 2016, 06:10 PM)
As bro dirtrun already explained, sub designs don't actually sound a whole lot different from one another. They aren't tweeters, which are instantly noticeable from one design to the other.

The most important thing when choosing a sub is:

1) The placement of it (this is CRITICAL)
2) How big your space is
3) How many are you putting in the room

Ported subs will always have higher SPL than sealed subs. Doesn't matter where the driver is placed, front firing, down firing, side firing or upside down firing. Bass waves are mostly omni directional, where under 20hz you won't hear bass anymore instead you will FEEL them.

Generally people believe that sealed subs will sound more accurate than ported subs. Where ported subs will sound "slow or sloppy", uncontrolled. That's true for the toy subs made by joke companies like logitech or edifier or some "insert cool x name here" brand.
*
Thank you Bro SSJ and Dirtrun. Now I learn more new stuff. Sealed sub and port sub. May i know if YAMAHA sub good enough for movies considering it well placed in a room.

My room size about 12x10x10. The tv will placed at 12' wall and viewing distance maybe around 8-9 feet considering other furniture such as sofa.
TSjovigrunge
post May 27 2016, 07:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(capoi @ May 27 2016, 07:13 PM)
Thank you Bro SSJ and Dirtrun. Now I learn more new stuff. Sealed sub and port sub. May i know if YAMAHA sub good enough for movies considering it well placed in a room.

My room size about 12x10x10. The tv will placed at 12' wall and viewing distance maybe around 8-9 feet considering other furniture such as sofa.
*
Any photo? tongue.gif
SSJBen
post May 27 2016, 07:42 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(capoi @ May 27 2016, 07:13 PM)
Thank you Bro SSJ and Dirtrun. Now I learn more new stuff. Sealed sub and port sub. May i know if YAMAHA sub good enough for movies considering it well placed in a room.

My room size about 12x10x10. The tv will placed at 12' wall and viewing distance maybe around 8-9 feet considering other furniture such as sofa.
*
Which Yamaha sub specifically?

Hard to say if the sub will fit your room. The thing is, sub placement is often tricky because most people put it in a multi functional room, not a dedicated HT room. Furnitures, dimensions, shape of the room, all of these things can and will cause an effect of how the LFE and mid-bass frequencies are transferred around the listening area(s).

That room size is considered is considered on the "small" side. You can opt for a ported sub of course, but if you don't have the space for it (since you said you have other furniture), a nice sealed sub like the SVS SB2000 should fill the room up quite nicely in the proper position.
sonerin
post May 27 2016, 07:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(capoi @ May 27 2016, 07:13 PM)
Thank you Bro SSJ and Dirtrun. Now I learn more new stuff. Sealed sub and port sub. May i know if YAMAHA sub good enough for movies considering it well placed in a room.

My room size about 12x10x10. The tv will placed at 12' wall and viewing distance maybe around 8-9 feet considering other furniture such as sofa.
*
Sub are non directional. Basically put a sub almost any where in the room is pretty ok.
ktek
post May 28 2016, 10:57 AM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(capoi @ May 27 2016, 07:13 PM)
Thank you Bro SSJ and Dirtrun. Now I learn more new stuff. Sealed sub and port sub. May i know if YAMAHA sub good enough for movies considering it well placed in a room.

My room size about 12x10x10. The tv will placed at 12' wall and viewing distance maybe around 8-9 feet considering other furniture such as sofa.
*
listen to 10" port sub of yamaha sw300 in friend living room. not proper calibrate yet. so so
sonerin
post May 28 2016, 05:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(ktek @ May 28 2016, 10:57 AM)
listen to 10" port sub of yamaha sw300 in friend living room. not proper calibrate yet. so so
*
Yamaha are not really good in speaker or sub
SSJBen
post May 28 2016, 09:42 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 27 2016, 07:48 PM)
Sub are non directional. Basically put a sub almost any where in the room is pretty ok.
*
Saying this will lead to confusion bro.

Bass waves are omni directional, but proper placement to deal with nulls and peaks are critical to intergrating a sub's performance. Technically it can be put anywhere in comparison to the LCR, but it should be in the location where the nulls are the least.
sonerin
post May 28 2016, 10:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 28 2016, 09:42 PM)
Saying this will lead to confusion bro.

Bass waves are omni directional, but proper placement to deal with nulls and peaks are critical to intergrating a sub's performance. Technically it can be put anywhere in comparison to the LCR, but it should be in the location where the nulls are the least.
*
Is true sub can be place with good location for better respond to avoid nulls. This does not mean you cannot place the sub any where in the room.
SSJBen
post May 28 2016, 11:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sonerin @ May 28 2016, 10:57 PM)
Is true sub can be place with good location for better respond to avoid nulls. This does not mean you cannot place the sub any where in the room.
*
Yes, in comparison to the LCR, the sub has more than just 1 place to be put in. Technically it can be anywhere, even inside the wall if need be, but just saying "anywhere" is not really the recommended way to go about placing a sub I think.
sonerin
post May 28 2016, 11:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 28 2016, 11:23 PM)
Yes, in comparison to the LCR, the sub has more than just 1 place to be put in. Technically it can be anywhere, even inside the wall if need be, but just saying "anywhere" is not really the recommended way to go about placing a sub I think.
*
Of course is also dependent on room and all but again it is correct to say any where is generally not a problem for sub
TSjovigrunge
post May 29 2016, 12:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Don't put the sub too near to your ears and heart! rclxs0.gif
capoi
post May 29 2016, 01:09 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


Thank you all.

Actually the more i dig about AVR the more poison i get. Before, i thought i just want to enjoy dolby true hd and dts Hd. But after i read about Atmos, my mind now thinking I should aim to get an AVR with Atmos supporr. Hopefully the price will drop a bit for AVR that come with Atmos next year.

My mind now thinking if any Atmost AVR available together with 5 speakers, i will go for it. Later i will invest for a good subwoofer. For front, center and rear speaker...any package will do.
SSJBen
post May 29 2016, 03:15 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(capoi @ May 29 2016, 01:09 AM)
Thank you all.

Actually the more i dig about AVR the more poison i get. Before, i thought i just want to enjoy dolby true hd and dts Hd. But after i read about Atmos, my mind now thinking I should aim to get an AVR with Atmos supporr. Hopefully the price will drop a bit for AVR that come with Atmos next year.

My mind now thinking if any Atmost AVR available together with 5 speakers, i will go for it. Later i will invest for a good subwoofer. For front, center and rear speaker...any package will do.
*
If you want to do Atmos, do it properly.

By that I mean by actually getting a receiver capable of doing 5.x.4 or 7.x.2 at the least. The mid-range receivers only capable for 7 channel processing is actually somewhat pointless. 5.x.2 is really only viable in small rooms (under 1400cu feet). Plan your room size, plan how long it will take for you to get everything in order. Getting a mid-range 7 channel AVR is pointless if you plan to do Atmos in a reasonably medium or large size room as there's really very little "future proofing" with AVRs now a days even if pretty much all the major features are already there.

Also, get your bed channels right first before considering Atmos. Spend as much as your speaker budget allows on the LCR. Get some decent surround channels, place them properly at the optimal height. After all that, then you worry about the overhead channels. Atmos is nice and all, but its benefits is really only worthwhile when you get everything else right first.
sonerin
post May 29 2016, 07:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(capoi @ May 29 2016, 01:09 AM)
Thank you all.

Actually the more i dig about AVR the more poison i get. Before, i thought i just want to enjoy dolby true hd and dts Hd. But after i read about Atmos, my mind now thinking I should aim to get an AVR with Atmos supporr. Hopefully the price will drop a bit for AVR that come with Atmos next year.

My mind now thinking if any Atmost AVR available together with 5 speakers, i will go for it. Later i will invest for a good subwoofer. For front, center and rear speaker...any package will do.
*
In HT the LCR and the sub is the most important. So will recommend you invest in this first. Atmos and dts X is all depend on what is the room size to setup. Ceiling speaker is the recommended
capoi
post May 29 2016, 01:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 29 2016, 03:15 AM)
If you want to do Atmos, do it properly.

By that I mean by actually getting a receiver capable of doing 5.x.4 or 7.x.2 at the least. The mid-range receivers only capable for 7 channel processing is actually somewhat pointless. 5.x.2 is really only viable in small rooms (under 1400cu feet). Plan your room size, plan how long it will take for you to get everything in order. Getting a mid-range 7 channel AVR is pointless if you plan to do Atmos in a reasonably medium or large size room as there's really very little "future proofing" with AVRs now a days even if pretty much all the major features are already there.

Also, get your bed channels right first before considering Atmos. Spend as much as your speaker budget allows on the LCR. Get some decent surround channels, place them properly at the optimal height. After all that, then you worry about the overhead channels. Atmos is nice and all, but its benefits is really only worthwhile when you get everything else right first.
*
Thank you. I consider my room is small. I will consider either 5.1.2 or 5.1.4. More than that impossible already.

TSjovigrunge
post May 29 2016, 11:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(capoi @ May 29 2016, 01:09 AM)
Thank you all.

Actually the more i dig about AVR the more poison i get. Before, i thought i just want to enjoy dolby true hd and dts Hd. But after i read about Atmos, my mind now thinking I should aim to get an AVR with Atmos supporr. Hopefully the price will drop a bit for AVR that come with Atmos next year.

My mind now thinking if any Atmost AVR available together with 5 speakers, i will go for it. Later i will invest for a good subwoofer. For front, center and rear speaker...any package will do.
*


hmm.gif
TSjovigrunge
post May 29 2016, 11:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,607 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
hmm.gif
capoi
post May 30 2016, 01:44 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 29 2016, 11:21 PM)


hmm.gif
*
Now I wonder if Atmos system will mess up with 7.1 system. Like what said in the video, most Bluray source came with 7.1 audio. What will happen to the 2 channel of audio which suppose to be placed at left and right of the room but now it in the ceiling. This situation is considering a bluray without atmos audio track. Will it become weird?

sonerin
post May 30 2016, 06:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(capoi @ May 30 2016, 01:44 AM)
Now I wonder if Atmos system will mess up with 7.1 system. Like what said in the video, most Bluray source came with 7.1 audio. What will happen to the 2 channel of audio which suppose to be placed at left and right of the room but now it in the ceiling. This situation is considering a bluray without atmos audio track. Will it become weird?
*
Not sure about atmos but had been using neural X for all my movies which is 7.1 and is very good
SSJBen
post May 30 2016, 03:31 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(capoi @ May 30 2016, 01:44 AM)
Now I wonder if Atmos system will mess up with 7.1 system. Like what said in the video, most Bluray source came with 7.1 audio. What will happen to the 2 channel of audio which suppose to be placed at left and right of the room but now it in the ceiling. This situation is considering a bluray without atmos audio track. Will it become weird?
*
No it won't.
With most receivers that has Atmos/DTS:X, you can do 2 things depending on your setup.

1) If it's a 5.x.4/2 setup, enabling DSU or Neural X will simply upmix the surround back channels and whatever faux height info to the overhead/height speakers.
2) Don't enable anything, use your receiver's "straight" mode. If you only have a 5 channel as your bed layers, the receiver will automatically mix the surround back info into the surround left/right speakers.

I've tested every iteration of Atmos/DTSX setup commercially available by now, from 7.x.4 to 5.x.2. At no point did a 7.1 mix sounded weird or off. Enabling DSU/NeuralX will make them behave like they are Atmos/DTSX tracks. Some movies it works very well, some not quite.

Also understand that not ALL movies with a 7.1 track are actually recorded as proper 7.1 channels. Many from the mid 2000s have a fake internal upmix from 5.1 into a 7.1 track.
capoi
post May 30 2016, 06:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 30 2016, 03:31 PM)
No it won't.
With most receivers that has Atmos/DTS:X, you can do 2 things depending on your setup.

1) If it's a 5.x.4/2 setup, enabling DSU or Neural X will simply upmix the surround back channels and whatever faux height info to the overhead/height speakers.
2) Don't enable anything, use your receiver's "straight" mode. If you only have a 5 channel as your bed layers, the receiver will automatically mix the surround back info into the surround left/right speakers.

I've tested every iteration of Atmos/DTSX setup commercially available by now, from 7.x.4 to 5.x.2. At no point did a 7.1 mix sounded weird or off. Enabling DSU/NeuralX will make them behave like they are Atmos/DTSX tracks. Some movies it works very well, some not quite.

Also understand that not ALL movies with a 7.1 track are actually recorded as proper 7.1 channels. Many from the mid 2000s have a fake internal upmix from 5.1 into a 7.1 track.
*
Thanks. Really appreciate your explanation.
SSJBen
post May 31 2016, 03:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Didn't get to listen to the Klipsch RF7 II last weekend.

Instead went to my granduncle's house to listen to his Magnepans. Still in awe of how smooth and rich the high end detail were. The speakers totally "disappeared", placing the sound in uncanny valley. Those ribbon tweeters are real stunning stuff, never harsh, never fatiguing, it's just soul striking.

Too bad he doesn't like a lot of bass and thus only have a single Wharfedale D8 sub so the low-end stuff was not to my liking.
sivanathan04
post Jun 1 2016, 12:53 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ May 31 2016, 03:23 PM)
Didn't get to listen to the Klipsch RF7 II last weekend.

Instead went to my granduncle's house to listen to his Magnepans. Still in awe of how smooth and rich the high end detail were. The speakers totally "disappeared", placing the sound in uncanny valley. Those ribbon tweeters are real stunning stuff, never harsh, never fatiguing, it's just soul striking.

Too bad he doesn't like a lot of bass and thus only have a single Wharfedale D8 sub so the low-end stuff was not to my liking.
*
thumbup.gif magnepan looks cool 😉

This post has been edited by sivanathan04: Jun 1 2016, 12:54 AM
sonerin
post Jun 1 2016, 06:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ Jun 1 2016, 12:53 AM)
thumbup.gif magnepan looks cool 😉
*
It's a good speaker and is also $$$$$
sivanathan04
post Jun 1 2016, 07:19 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(sonerin @ Jun 1 2016, 06:57 AM)
It's a good speaker and is also $$$$$
*
😋
steplee
post Jun 1 2016, 09:10 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: May 2008


Hi,

Anyone know is there a yamaha gallery to show all their products and provide better user hand-on and experience?

Regards,
sonerin
post Jun 1 2016, 10:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(steplee @ Jun 1 2016, 09:10 AM)
Hi,

Anyone know is there a yamaha gallery to show all their products and provide better user hand-on and experience?

Regards,
*
Yamaha kelana jaya is the HQ which will have all their products
SSJBen
post Jun 1 2016, 02:49 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ Jun 1 2016, 12:53 AM)
thumbup.gif magnepan looks cool 😉
*
Looks is one thing, performance is another. To really drive the Maggies, an external amp would be ideal.
sivanathan04
post Jun 1 2016, 03:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jun 1 2016, 02:49 PM)
Looks is one thing, performance is another. To really drive the Maggies, an external amp would be ideal.
*
Great listener have to spend more 😉...external amp it means power amp right
SSJBen
post Jun 1 2016, 04:16 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ Jun 1 2016, 03:39 PM)
Great listener have to spend more 😉...external amp it means power amp right
*
Yes, an external power amp.

Many things need to upgrade though, the projector is the first one (it's still only a JVC 720p lol). A newer pre/pro and at least a sub upgrade.

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2654sec    0.94    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 08:06 PM