Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AV Receivers/ Speakers/ Subwoofers, Discussion & Opinion

views
     
teop
post Mar 19 2016, 12:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
Hi newbie here using RX-V679. I need some advice on speakers setup.

1. How significant is a 5.1 vs 7.1 setup? Is it worth it especially considering that I would watch only 3 titles/year.

2. Is there a significant difference between using small surround speakers vs. larger ones?

3. Due to living room design, the most convenient location for my surround speakers is about 40/45 degrees behind listening position at 2.9m/2.5m distance. Is that ok or it would be much better to put it at 2/-2 degrees @ 2.2m/2.2m distance?

Thanks.
teop
post Mar 20 2016, 01:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 19 2016, 06:31 AM)
5.1 will do. Larger speaker is always better. SiZe does matter. The distant is best to keep within 2 meters as most likely your surround speaker size is small which is not enough if distance is far
*
Actually I'm not using a subwoofer, so it is really a 5.0 system, right? So far I'm happy with the loudness. I feel that my floor stand works pretty well. Casual listening is at -35db and if I blast it it will be at -25db. YPAO did add 2.5/1.5db to my surround.

Though I did notice that if placed closer, the sound is more distinct and easier to pin point. Not sure if that is a good or bad attribute.

Currently the sound coming from surround sound pretty neutral, as in evenly distributed, so it does not sound overly discrete.

QUOTE(Ngto @ Mar 19 2016, 09:41 AM)
If only watching 3 titles per yr, save your money, sell everything and go Cinema watch.
*
But seriously, how many title comes out in a year that is worth watching where surround matters.
The rest of the time is either mostly listening to music daily or watching TV.

QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 19 2016, 02:12 PM)
congrats bro. welcome to.yamaha
*
Thanks for having me.

QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 19 2016, 02:15 PM)
put side will give wrap around effect.
put rear corner will give suprise attack effect.
*
When you say put to the side or rear do you mean physically, change channel (from surround to surround back) or both?

If you just shift the speakers for the surround channel further back, will YPAO/DSP know about it and makes adjustments accordingly? I don't want sound that is meant for the side to come out from the rear because it was placed too further back.

QUOTE(supersound @ Mar 19 2016, 02:30 PM)
2. same as above, size does not matters, more on how the enclosure being designed. I've DIY a speaker that using 4" driver which using tapped horn design, blind fold a self claim audiophile(that spending rm50k for a pair of midbass + tweeter), let him listen and he thought was a 10" subwoofer playing.
3. only your ears will tell you which is the best listening position, if anyone that can simply comes out a number without knowing your height, your room size, what is in that room, he is basically a dumb that pretend to be an expert.
*
For the speaker size, I was actually referring the small/large size terms used in the AVR setup. Full range (or not full range) speakers, I think. Sorry for that. So the question is really whether full range speakers have a big impact when used for surround. Agree that the physical speaker/enclosure size don't matter when looking at performance rather than the design is more important.

Ya, looking for accurate setup can only be done by actually testing it. I was looking more for a rule-of-thumb/general setup advice based on the experience you guys have on what will or will not work and what matter and does not matters. Otherwise I would not know where to start and what to try. Just like how an experienced wire-man can tell roughly what wire size to use without calculating.

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 19 2016, 05:53 PM)
5.1 vs 7.1 depends so much on the room dimensions. So many people do not take into account about their room dimension and simply just add speakers, then complain that it either sounds worse or has zero improvements. The same reason why stereo can potentially sound as immersive as a 5 channel setup. More doesn't always mean better in audio.

Room is nearly as critical as the choice of speakers IMO.

In a proper room, even a 5.1.2 (or 5.2.2 preferably) setup is more immersive than a 7.1 (or 7.2 prerably) setup. A 5.2.4 setup can actually sound as good as a 7.2.2 setup even. It's all about balance and room conditions.
*
Hold on, you almost lost me with all the 3rd .number. Had to google those ceiling speakers, but I got your point.

Anyway I have my system setup in my living room, about 4.3m width x 5.9m x 3m high plaster ceiling. On my right-top half is solid brick/cement wall and the right-bottom half is open and connects to the dinning room. My listening position is in the center so I have about 3m of space behind me.

Not much in terms of furniture, bare walls and 3+2 sofa distributed on the left and right.

Thanks for all your feedback.

So I guess I'll just stick with 5.0 for now, only thing left to figure out is the surround speaker position.
teop
post Mar 21 2016, 01:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 20 2016, 01:44 PM)
Surrounds shouldn't actually sound discrete, it shouldn't stand out more than your LCR unless the mix calls for it. But in most situations, the surrounds are there to provide an extension of the soundstage made by the mains, but NOT actually creating a soundstage of its own.

Don't fall into the same mistake where many new 5, 7 or however many channels owners do: raise the surround levels higher than the mains just because they thought they spent money on them and they should hear them as discrete sources. Then they come back and complain the whole soundstage sounds uncohesive and the whole fronts sound smeared or muffled.

This applies for games too btw, even competitive FPS ones. It doesn't mean hearing someone behind you louder is better, you then just lose details of those at the side or infront of you.
*
I think I understand what you are trying to say. When I'm listening to music, setting to straight decode will result in distinct separation between the LR channels leaving a hole in the middle. If set to 2 ch Stereo the LR channels blends smoothly.

Now the burning question is the positioning of the LR surround. The thing is it is kind of difficult to know if I'm putting it to far back. The front is easier to judge since you have visual queues. I remember that when I bought the Creative Live! sound card, it came with a demo with various sound circling your head together with a visual positioning of the sound. Unfortunately no such thing here. Its kind of like trying to tell a color-blind person the color of red. If I haven't heard it before, how do I know if it is right or wrong unless of course it is totally screwed. It would requires watching numerous titles with the right scenes with the right effect, which I don't have for now.

Any pointers there? Any suitable demo that I can download. Also does YPAO takes position into account? I think it would be impossible since it only takes single point reading so it can only figure out the distance.
teop
post Mar 22 2016, 12:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 21 2016, 02:49 PM)
How far your surrounds are depends entirely on the type of speaker and your room conditions. Typically it should be near equidistant to your front LR, but that's just a very general rule. Plenty of surround setup articles around the net that further explain how to place your speakers, check them out.

You don't need that faux audio demo by Creative because that will give you a wrong perception of the appropriate SPL and delay (distance). There is a pink noise test tone in the v679, use that instead.

The whole reason for YPAO is to take positioning of the speakers, room acoustics and seating position into account. Otherwise there's zero reason for YPAO to exist nor any other auto-PEQ calibrator to continue business.

Yes one point measurement will be inaccurate if your listening area is awkward or your room acoustics is poor.
*
Last night I tried re-positioning my surround from the back to the sides. It sounded pretty terrible as I become too aware of the sounds coming from the sides. Also the back area seem to be void of sound. Probably because I have a large back space and putting the surround to the sides also reduces/imbalance reflection from the walls since my right-side is an open area for the left surround. Putting the surround to the back and pointing towards the listening position works much better providing a wider 360 experience. Although it is about 40-45 degrees behind, it sounds more like 20 degrees.

I have never used the test tone before. Can you tell me what to listen for? As in if the sound is coming from the left or the back what should I be expecting? I would imagine that when the tone is output from all channels that the tone should be balanced in the center. As for individual tone, I have no idea.

This post has been edited by teop: Mar 22 2016, 12:52 PM
teop
post Mar 22 2016, 12:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 21 2016, 02:52 PM)
before i forget, always use surround LR in 5.1 no matter u install beside or behind (can do that)
the surround back LR only activate in 7.1

try to make an equal length triangle between primary seat, left & right spkr.
they shouldn't make a hole in middle unless spkr too far away or toe in (angled inside) too much. usually i let spk face front without toe if no big object /wall beside.
run a quick ypao to get latest distance & db.
the ideal ypao is minimal difference for front channel level & distance

after u settle front, change to all ch stereo, play a normal voice song.
reduce front LR spk level db to minimum but remember ori value
now turn urself backward, move urself in horizontal line while listen which position has the most balance surround left vs right.
if u are standing near surround left spkr, increase its db 1 or 2.
so the balance position shift to center.
if near surround right, do the same. or reduce the boost u added just now.

once again the rear middle hole will be fill with voice.
restore front ori db as before. use test tone in yamaha manual spk setup to balance out front vs rear using ear or spl meter /phone app.

demo got a lot ah. see demo-world.eu under 2d trailer hd section.
dolby, dts & thx made are good to begin with
*
Thanks for the tips. I'll be sure to try it.

My LR speakers is actually toe in from the start as recommended by the speakers manual, although the degree of toe is not mentioned. Currently it is pointing directly to the sides of my ears. How would I know if I'm toeing too much or too little? What do I listen for?

Currently my front and surround distance is pretty equal and balanced. Based on my previous memory, listening to music with all speakers on produces a 360 effect. And when moving around the room, the sound is pretty balanced until I'm really close to one of the speaker before it becomes obvious to its sound output.
teop
post Mar 26 2016, 01:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(ktek @ Mar 22 2016, 02:49 PM)
any movement must run ypao or manual adjust distance.
u move rear to side the original distance compensation is a lot, causing funny problem of coverage & loud like u experienced.

well, as you mentioned front spk sound like missing hole during straight /pure direct. can u tell what spk model & ypao level, distance?
the room size is simlar to mine, using wide wall 6x4m.

i suspect is not toe angle, but distance far apart between front L & R. the triangle projected behind seat instead. try stand that area to listen in straight /direct mode
[attachmentid=6220246]
*
QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 22 2016, 06:10 PM)
Take measuring tape, those use for house renovation. Than seat at your position and move the measuring tape 360 around to get the distance. At least you know what ever position you have is correct
*
Ya, I did run YPAO everytime adjustments are made. But in this case YPAO failed to help.

I'm pretty impressed with YPAO as the measurements are spot on. It was YPAO that initially made me realize that my surround will not be at equal distance!! (I mis-calculated on the floor tiles).

My fronts are at FL 2.6m (0db), C 2.45m (-3.5db), FR 2.6m (0db), SL 2.65 (2.0db), SR 2.2m (1.5db) from listening position. My FLR is 2.0m apart.

With some of the surround test videos from demo.world.eu, I was able to adjust and confirm that my speakers are in proper position. Much easier than watching movies.

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 22 2016, 07:00 PM)
Directly to the sides? It usually does sound bad because this position is usually too distinctive (this is also why you have a hole on the back). Poor tweeter design will also make everything sound very artificial and harsh. Direct side positions should only be used for dipole/bipole speakers and even then they need to be about 3ft at least higher than the MLP.

The idea surround location for monopole (which are satellites or bookshelves) is about 2ft. behind (or more, depending on the size of the room of course), 20-30 degrees angled. Alternatively, you can just place the surround speakers directly at the back.

For reference, this is my secondary bedroom setup:

[attachmentid=6221033]
So you see, even with a bed right next to my couch, I managed to have a cohesive soundstage just with some logical  adjustments despite the setup not being "correct" or "optimized".
My LR speakers on this may look more toed-in than it seems, but it's just the angle of the picture btw.
*
Thanks for the advice and photo of your setup. They explained a lot. At least now I know that it is possible to put speakers that close together.
teop
post Mar 26 2016, 01:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Mar 25 2016, 12:42 AM)
, but I added those "earthquake prevention" pads from Daiso under the speakers which added half an inch of height. No biggie.

Amazing pads though, they're sticky with no residue so I don't have to use blu-tack to prevent my speakers from failling over if someone bumps into them and yet they really did stop the slight resonance between the top plate and the speakers.

This are the ones - http://www.cooltoyzph.com/viewitem.php?iid=12
Though I'm only using the blue ones.
*
I saw those sticky pads and knew what it would be good for even before I bought my HT setup. Because they are quite thick and soft, it can easily balance uneven floors. Useful stuff.

QUOTE(sonerin @ Mar 25 2016, 06:17 AM)
I tried to find the pad in daiso but cannot find it
*
Ya like all other shops with many outlet, each will stock differently. So I end up browsing at every store to see what they have to offer. Daiso at Mahkota Cheras carries it.
teop
post Apr 28 2016, 01:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 19 2016, 10:06 AM)
Without a Sub :-

1) When you set your Speakers to  large, all frequencies are directed to your Speakers. So your Speakers get the full range. However the very low Bass (.1-LFE channel from 5.1 movies)  which is exclusive to only a SUB will be missing. That's why you are missing the Oomph you mentioned.

2) When you set to Small, Whatever Hz you set will be directed to your Sub and cut-off from your Speakers. So you won't get the full range from your speakers. And since you don't have Sub, those frequencies will be completely missing from your hearing. Not to mention, the .1 LFE will be missing as well.  Double Oomph gone.
*
What about the surround? If the front and surround is full range and have different frequency respond how do you set the crossover? Or you only target the front speakers?
teop
post Jun 15 2016, 01:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Jun 10 2016, 12:45 AM)
I wouldn't buy any electronic stuff from website. Go to the shop, test it and even if you face any problem in the future, it's easier to send for repair.  smile.gif
*
If you know what you wanted to buy, you can actually get it cheaper sometimes from 11street or gemfive. You will need to check who (shop) is supplying the goods, they will provide the warranty.

QUOTE(ktek @ Jun 10 2016, 10:30 AM)
11street is middle man or drop shipping. behind has a real seller which not reveal identity.

any issue hapen, middle man wont care much. so do u care ma?
scam. damaged postage, not deliver on time. out of stok. slow refund. u tanggung.

cheap2 item no issue la. big item i wont buy fron these middle man website.
*
While 11street is middle man, you can actually contact the seller to find out who they are. While many might be individual sellers, there are also plenty of traditional and reputable brick and mortar sellers there too.

Most on-line site provide protection to both buyer and seller. Delays for refund is inevitable as there is a minimum of 2 weeks to one month as the payment chain is long : on-line site -> payment gateway -> credit card -> seller . If you are worried about shipping delays and damages, you can always arrange to self-collect and get refund from shipping (not always possible).

For example, Desa Home sells both on 11Street and GemFive platform though may not always offer the same price. According to them, prices there is the same as retail. There are also plenty of sellers trying to sell at extremely inflated prices as well.

Sometimes there will be promotions offered by these on-line platform that is not provided by the seller. It is possible to get additional discount ranging from 10%-25% that the seller would otherwise not be able to provide. One good example is IT products. We all know most IT products (mainly DIY components) only offer small discount but if you buy them on-line during a promotion, you can actually save quite a bit.

I'm not saying that it is all bed of roses here, but what I'm saying is you just have to be careful just as you would when buying from traditional shops! I bet you won't want to buy from non-reputable shops even if it is cheap.
teop
post Jun 16 2016, 12:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Jun 16 2016, 12:58 AM)
I am not saying don't buy from online websites but try not to buy electronic items (especially expensive ones). You can imagine the trouble you're going to get when you get a faulty one.  smile.gif
*
Ya if you buy branded with local manufacturer support or if the retailer's shop is nearby your place then there is no reason to worry biggrin.gif
teop
post Jun 16 2016, 12:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(ktek @ Jun 16 2016, 11:38 AM)
just imagine la. the returning process, ur 3-5k money floating around unknown places for many days. im sure u will have uneasy sleep every nite!
*
If its 3-5k then you are no longer in the budget zone... sweat.gif those discount you get don't applies anymore. 1-2k I think its ok
teop
post Jun 17 2016, 11:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(ktek @ Jun 16 2016, 12:58 PM)
yup. quite agree with u.
unfortunately branded audio equipment are not priced around 1-2k lo.
easily double-triple of what i mentioned.
*
Oh ya forgot many sifu here in advanced stage, notworthy.gif
teop
post Jun 28 2016, 10:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(sivanathan04 @ Jun 27 2016, 09:05 PM)
Was in desa home kepong today..many models finish especially entry lvl and midrange out of stock...the pioneer lx78 having some good deal 3k plus but display set.....Yamaha rx v679 price rm 2500 they said price increased 😋...
*
Well if you go on-line hopefully you can get it from them at RM 1199 / RM 2349 for RX-V139 / RX-V679 respectively.
teop
post Sep 3 2016, 04:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
For the price RM3,663.36

Attached Image
teop
post Sep 3 2016, 04:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
New, not display set

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0290sec    0.60    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 07:31 AM