Alright, read it from page 1. Hm. Wasn't expecting what I found.
Dreamer is right on the money 99% of the time... I found myself wincing only a few times, but it was never on the main topic.
It reminds me when I thought, just for fun, that I'd look up
Thomas Paine's Common Sense and try making a web post arguing against it. I ended up agreeing 100% with nearly everything I saw, and was even taken by some of the arguments put forth. I can see why those guys won the revolution.
So, not so much a hurricane... but yea. Here goes.
>>
Page 3 Debbieyss: Before I follow and absorb one's teaching, I value his personality and attitude, then only his material achievements in life.
Page 5 Debbieyss: Whatever Dreamer is sharing here, to be honest, I only adopt 30% to 40% of his teaching.
◘ So, if a teacher tells you that E=MC2, you'll only absorb that if you value his attitude? If he goes on to tell you how that formula works, you will only absorb 30 or 40% of it because you dont personally like the teacher?
>>
Page 4 kaiserwulf: He would thrived well in a Malaysian educated or ol'skool of hard knocks or cinapek working environment; too bad its really matsalleh here (Debbie type mindset somewhat) and the Msians in the dept are more of Debbie's type of mindset.
Imagine this: Dreamer finds a Debbie subordinate- he gives her low rating and maybe less to no chance of promotion. Debbie finds a Dreamer subordinate- she gives him a low rating or maybe less to no chance of promotion.
See where I am coming from? Just saying there is no right or no wrong in life- is who has the big gun is the king. Or the most gun wins- aka majority.
◘ Here's something that hasn't been discussed yet about getting rich and succeeding.
Your example is why most Malaysian businesses simply cannot compete on the international level. If you want to compete with other businesses, you have to learn
that it's not about you, what you personally feel, or who you dont like. This is probably THE THING holding Malaysia back more than anything else. If you dont personally like someone, So. F*ing. What. You're supposed to be focusing on the customer, ensuring your product is better than the competition's, trying to be the first to come up with new innovations, you know, RUNNING YOUR BUSINESS. Not playing politics and getting into petty squabbles.
Who was it that said "You want a friend? Get a dog." It's why comparing M'sian companies to British and American companies is like comparing Little League to the NBA. I'd bet money if you had a highschool basketball team that played AS A TEAM, against the Chicago Bulls where everyone was playing on their own (because, after all, they dont personally LIKE each other), the highschool team would win. That's because part of winning means getting over yourself and looking past incredibly stupid differences.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3J9hmCLmvg&feature=related - foward to 2:40 and listen very, very carefully. For those of you with hearing problems: "An army, is a team. It lives, sleeps, eats, fights as a team. This individuality stuff is a bunch of crap." - because if you need cover fire, you shouldn't have to worry about whether you'll get it or not because this morning you and your foxhole mate had an argument about ObamaCare. Likewise, when you have a deadline to meet, you DO NOT need to wonder if your teammate is going to forward you the documents you need to complete the project on time because you got in a pissing match over LowYat the night before.
Simper fi.
>>
Page 4 Dreamer:
(Addressing Debbie) YOU are NOT listening and reading very well. Do a search on all her posts. Then, ask yourself a SIMPLE question, is this a person that is achieving her goal?? In her own judgment, she had failed. And, she is NOT HAPPY.
◘ Now here's where I winced. Dreamer, um... do a search on all her posts? .......... no thanks.
And so what if she failed and isn't happy? Dude you dont know who she is.
>> Now, if a person had failed in her own career but has the AUDACITY to tell people how to do their job, teach, manage some others, we call that kind of people STUPID!!
◘ I dont think so. Successful people have failed many, many times. I mean you said that somewhere in this thread, if I recall. You fail, and you keep trying. Failure is the best teacher there is. She didn't agree with you, but here again is that knee-jerk reaction to really coming down on someone because they disagreed. It kinda makes you look authoritarian. What you said on the main topic is still correct, but your reaction here is a bit overkill.
>> In order for someone to TEACH, a person needs to know the material. Will you asked someone that is lousy in English to teach you English?? That is common sense.
◘ But I dont think you can compare being lousy at English to having failed in business.
>> For example, WHY would anyone taking lesson from people on how to manage people when the person has NEVER manage anyone??
◘ But that's not the case here. It's more like someone who HAS managed people, lots of times, failed lots of times, kept trying, got better and better, and probably came on here to voice their frustrations during the learning process. I think you would otherwise praise this, in fact... but she disagreed with you so you're attacking it instead.
>>
Page 5 Dreamer: I am NOT PAID to teach you. A basic COMMON COURTESY is say "Thank You" to someone that help you in some fashion. But, what do I get from you instead?? And, what does this SAY about YOU?? And, what kind of person that you are??
◘ Um, ok... thanks? I'll be sure to thank you for each and every post you make. After all, it's free... and you're definitely not coming off as being pushy or anything.
>> The TRUTH is rich people do not become rich by aiming to be rich. That is the SIDE BENEFIT. Their AIM is to be ABOVE AVERAGE aka THE BEST in their chosen career / business. Becoming rich is the unintended benefits. They are having so much fun in their job / business that money is IRRELEVANT.
◘ Back on track! Yes, I completely agree!!!
>>
Page 5 Meruchan: I agree. People who work with passion and interest will gradually develop the knack of it and become skilled and could then demand a higher pay for it. Yes I agree with this but theres nothing wrong to people who are average. If there's no average people, you can't be the best. If everyone is good at what they dO, this will result in stiff competition.
I dont know dreamer but the way you're presenting this whole thing is kinda focus on how to get rich. And how average people are just losers.
◘ If we lived in a world where everyone took responsibility for their situations and tried to be the best at what they do, we would live on a planet FULL of Einsteins, Newtons, Washingtons, Lincolns, and Mahatirs, and we would have colonized every planet orbiting every star visible in the night sky, and probably cured every disease by now.
The average person just "accepts" what he has and tells himself he cant do anything about it. I'm sorry but yea, that's a real loser right there! That's what Dreamer's getting at I think. No one has to be that way. And it's flawed to think that there's only a limited amount of pie to go around. If everyone pushed to achieve, and took on the role of WINNER, then our world would be nothing but winners.
>>
Page 4 howszat: So that makes your thread topic contradictory, and actually out of topic.
If the way you want to live your life is to be average, why worry about whether you are rich or not, and what other people think?
◘ If you're genuinely happy with what you have, truly and honestly, and simply dont care if you get more beyond what you have now, then you're not really what we're referring to when we say "average".
The average guy wants more, but instead of trying, finds that it's easier to sit and whine about wanting more. Buddha for example, had nothing, but was totally cool with that. Buddha wasn't average, he was a winner, but in a winner in a different way. What gets on my nerves it people who underachieve and settle for less, meaning they'll always HAVE less, make excuses for not trying, and try to pass it off as being somehow pious or closer to enlightenment. In fact, that's one reason I left Buddhism - but that's another topic for another thread on another board.
>>
Page 5 Debbiesyy: 1. If you have been giving tuition, if you have been teaching all these years, you will find out that there are teachers holding forged certificates, teaching piano, giving tuitions. If you happen to meet a person who teach without proper qualification, that is COMMON. There are many people buy degree cert and apply jobs nowadays! But I don't share my views without prior real life experiences.
2. If you see my posts showing hatred emotion that can also mean I am telling the fact in this world. Why must you think it's happening to me? Even if I am complaining now doesn't mean that I will sit there and do nothing to breakthrough.
3. My boss has lousy and nasty temper though she is in her 50s now, Senior Manager position, she's trying to teach me the way she handles things but NONE of her teachings work on me. There are many different ways to get things done, everyone has his own way, I believe; with her way of doing things (yell at people to convince others; interrupt people's conversations whenever people sharing opinions so no one can go against her will; fast to judge and slow to listen etc), it makes someone looks "ugly" and unprofessional. I have the choice to choose and I will choose to be the best - be a nice person and able to get things done.
◘ Ok, that's true.
>>
Page 5 Jancrot: However, can you convince me that "Those unsuccessful chicken rice seller won't do the same thing like the successful one does?"
I will put an extreme example here: Let's say that the business of SuperGreatCompany Sdn Bhd grows on UnluckyPoorCompany Sdn Bhd loss. Will you still say the same thing? As SuperGreatCompany employee, will you slow down your business on behalf of helping UnluckyPoorCompany? I bet you won't. A communist will do so, will you?
◘ I'm not sure if you're getting how this works.
Why does SGC grow on UPC's loss? It's because SGC is serving the customer BETTER, giving them better service with better treatment at lower prices. Remember no one's forcing the customer to spend his money here or there. The customer decides totally and completely on his own WHERE and HOW he'll spend his money to increase his happiness. So if UPC wanted to STOP losing customers, there's a number of things they could do. Motivated by possibly going out of business forever, they might find out the cause of losing customers, then fix that problem.
Maybe UPC has roaches all over the floor and crawling through the food. Maybe their washroom hasn't cleaned, or its broken - has been used - and doesn't flush. Maybe they give foreigners the "white guy price". Maybe they mix their soap bottles with water so they dont have to buy more soap. Does any of this sound like, oh I dont know... ANY MALAYSIAN MAMAK PLACES
YOU MIGHT HAVE SEEN LATELY??? If an International chain opens up next door, and they lose business, Its. Their. Own. Fault.
You must compete with people who are better than you. This means you must improve. When you improve, you win. Your competitor now has more competition because you improved, and will now stay on top of his game, keeping himself in sharper and in better condition - so he wins. The customers get ever better and better services, prices, and innovations from both companies. So basically,
EVERYONE WINS.
>> As an Asian,
◘ Oh brother here we go...
>> I know exactly that this is cruel.
◘ Yep, goddam straight. I should be allowed to sit and not do a damn thing to improve my business but still get customers. If a competitor opens up next door, then by god I shouldn't have to sweep my goddam floor if I dont want to! Customers dont like it? THEY HAVE TO COME ANYWAY!!! If they dont, it's cruel! That other business is doing better than me and growing on my loss. CRUEL, CRUEL WORLD!!!
>> But that's business. Furthermore, that's competition and even further, that's Evolution. Natural selection. The fittest and the one most responsive to change wins.
◘ Right, so, um... how is that cruel? Oh wait, your Asian. My Mat Salleh vision doesn't pick up imagined cruelty, sorry.
>>
Page 6 Howszat: You haven't told us how much time you wasted on all the other handbooks/manuals you read in your life with no returns at all.
>> That's what you saved 20 years ago. How much have you saved since then? Since you haven't said anything, the answer means you have wasted all your time reading manuals for the last 20 years.
◘ I'm not sure what you were trying to prove here. We've already agreed that there simply are no guarantees with anything we do in life. I may go to college for 8 years to study audio cassette engineering. When I graduate, CD players now dominate the market. My 8 years of college was for nothing. I wasted all my time and money on that.
But that's how it works. I didn't KNOW before I took the investment of time and money whether or not this particular career path was going to pay off. I took the risk. Risk is an inextricable part of the free market. This risk may pay off, and when it does, then I'm set for life. When it doesn't, I'm ruined. What are you trying to prove by asking how much time we invest that doesn't pay off?
Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGWckoIv0jk&feature=related - its less than 2 minutes long and explains what I'm saying.
>>
Page 7 Dreamer: 3) When I was in college, for 6 years, I slept on the average of 4 hours per day. I studied at 167% of full-time student course load plus work 2 part-time jobs at 40 hours per week.
>> So, are you saying that after 40 years old, a person could still work at the SAME PACE??
◘ I think the guy you're saying this to had a point. George Foreman won the world heavyweight championship in his 40s. Dr Hatfield set a powerlifting record of 1,014 pound squat, in his 40s. Bill Pearl won professional bodybuilding contests in his 50s. So yea, it's very possible a 40 or 50+ year old could keep the same pace.
>> 5) Complacency!!! You ASSUME that average people can survive.. Common disease in Malaysia.
◘ But actually... average people do survive. They survive all the time. But this thread isn't meant to encourage people to survive, it's meant to encourage them to THRIVE.
>> 6) Most people do not spend time figure this (Competitive Advantage ) out to begin. They ASSUME that they have NONE.
◘ His point was, what if we dont have a competitive advantage. While it's true that lots of people dont figure out what their advantage is, I was going to comment on an alternative option...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Ocean_Strategy . Sometimes you dont need a competitive advantage... you just need innovation, and a niche.

And if you dont have competitiveness or innovation, or the motivation to find either, please get out of the gene pool. Thanks.
>>
Page 7 3dassets: I don't get this, if die fighting before achieving anything is not successful, just nobody and known as failure only successful and enjoying the luxury are somebody. If spent 30 years to achieve a goal at 100% effort also means no life because the so called life only begin at 50, I've lost 23 years and 7 years before 50, I live for today & tomorrow than to devote my last chance to live a young and healthy life while I can because money cannot buy what was lost.
◘ Again, risk is an inherent factor in everything we do. If your life strategy is to forget the future and enjoy the time you have now because you dont want to face uncertainty... well that sounds like the ant and the grasshopper to me (hope Malaysians know that reference).
>>
Page 8 3dassets: Dreamer101, have you forgotten you told someone that you are retiring in a few years?
◘ I dont get what Dreamer's age has to do with anything. Way too many posts on here dedicated to that. It doesn't matter.
>>
Page 8 PenangLaksa: Rich dad and poor dad thinks completely the opposite of what dreamer thinks. unsure.gif
http://www.wikisummaries.org/Rich_Dad,_Poor_Dad◘ The book actually agrees exactly with what Dreamer has been saying.
This post has been edited by Kasey Brown: Aug 29 2011, 10:39 PM