Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Average people are not rich!, Pick the RIGHT career / business

views
     
seantang
post Aug 21 2011, 09:25 PM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


QUOTE(3dassets @ Aug 21 2011, 09:18 PM)
Dreamer101, have you forgotten you told someone that you are retiring in a few years? That means in the scope of 50 unless it was a lie, also you did mention about your children and family members when someone challenged you and it sums up that you are near 55 and actively looking for investment opportunity, that is how we got acquainted in a dispute about gov policy and private practices.

I caught a few liars in lyn.net in the past that make me think a bunch of staff cocking to themselves to generate traffic.
Must all retirements be at 55? Cannot retire earlier?

seantang
post Aug 21 2011, 10:24 PM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


QUOTE(3dassets @ Aug 21 2011, 09:43 PM)
No, the manner of words imply that he is waiting for the EPF money and ready to invest by then.
OK. But the feeling I get is that he's pretty well invested and has enough passive income. Not sure where the reference to EPF is coming from.

QUOTE(3dassets)
This is what dreamer meant by not being average, you see things too short because you think shallow, don't feel offended, just to clarify.
I'm not offended, as this is perhaps not directed at my one sentence posting. All I pointed out was that your painfully done analysis of Dreamer's age and therefore the possibility that he's lying - is based on the the central assumption that he retires at 55, which need not be true.

This post has been edited by seantang: Aug 21 2011, 10:25 PM
seantang
post Sep 2 2011, 08:35 PM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


QUOTE(Tigerr @ Sep 2 2011, 02:48 PM)
Kasey, what you said is totally what i agreed. However, enough said, it is just what we both agreed and what we think it should be the way. However, for courtesy sake, it should be better if you want to eat Pork in front of the Muslims. Not all of them can accept that. Some may see it as offensive gesture. Probably you wont feel it as i believe you are dealing with the modern Muslim folks.
Fine... I agree if I bring pork to eat in front of them.

What if they bring themselves in front of my pork? Do I put away my pork because they've arrived, or should they go somewhere else away from my pork?

QUOTE(Tigerr)
Have is a classic example, in an office pantry where a non-muslim staffs heated up his lunch(consist of pork) using the microwave, and found out by one of the Muslim receptionist. In the end, the microwave have to be disposed as Muslim colleagues cannot use it anymore eventhough how clean you going to clean it. From that day onward, no pork is allowed to be consumed in the pantry room. Please dont be suprise as this happened in one of the Swiss MNC in Malaysia.
The correct solution would be to get another microwave. Why do you have to dispose of the old one?

My company's pantry has 2 microwaves. One for halal food, the other for non-halal food.

I agree that amenities and utensils for halal and non-halal food should not be mixed. But it does not mean that non-halal must always give way.

QUOTE(Tigerr)
We need to respect each other, but the way showing respect to each other, we must also know how the locals practise it. Sometimes, what we think and act could be wrong in the eyes of others.
Like Dreamer said, respect is a 2 way street.

I respect you by offering to compromising. You respect me by refusing my offer. Then each of us do our own thing, on our own time, with our own money. We both go out of our way to avoid each other. Alternatively, we can take turns compromising.

Respect is when we allow each other space to do our own thing.

This post has been edited by seantang: Sep 2 2011, 08:56 PM
seantang
post Sep 3 2011, 05:10 PM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


QUOTE(mieza @ Sep 3 2011, 04:06 PM)
Lets say for example, you can't find replacement for Dr.Mahathir. Even someone take over his place, everything is not the same anymore. Only someone that better than he is can make the different.

Got the picture..?
Lee Kuan Yew's not too busy these days. He's better.

seantang
post Sep 4 2011, 12:35 AM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


QUOTE(Tigerr @ Sep 4 2011, 12:05 AM)
Without Mahathir bringing up the economy back in 80s and 90s....do you think he can have such an opportunity to find good employerment and have the chance to make the money?
Short answer... HELL YES!

Without Mahathir (and in truth, it's not the old horse alone but thousands of other corrupt, lazy, power crazy politicians in his supporting cast), Malaysia would have been more successful. Much, much more successful. Mr Bean would have been less of a hindrance to the country's development (economically, legally and socially) over the same 22 years.

With 6 times the human potential of Singapore, more natural resources than we'd possibly need (oil, lumber, tin, rubber, land, water, agriculture etc), and a legacy of the best Western administrative, educational and legal systems at our disposal... Mahathir, his predecessors and successors have still managed to turn the country into a social /racial /religious /political basket case that's slowly coming apart at its seams.

seantang
post Sep 4 2011, 10:46 AM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


QUOTE(wodenus @ Sep 4 2011, 09:43 AM)
How do you justify this? first you say without him we would have been more successful, but without him means with someone else, and which someone else would it have been?
I already mentioned Mr Bean (metaphorically... meaning anyone else would have done better). Mahathir was a 1st generation Indian immigrant masquerading as a Malay, and to gain the support of the Malays, he had to be more ultra than all the Malays put together. It's a formula that all the Indian / Pakistani / Middle East / North African bumi-wannabe UMNO politicians emulate today.

Who else? Anwar Ibrahim in the later years? Remember him? Tengku Razaleigh in the earlier years? Lee Kuan Yew too if things had been successful in the even earlier years... although the whole separation of Malaysia and Singapore was mainly the work of Mahathir's predecessors.

This post has been edited by seantang: Sep 4 2011, 11:02 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0183sec    1.11    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 05:23 PM