QUOTE(ar188 @ Jan 11 2009, 07:36 PM)
you call those awards ar? what hi fi mag? home cinema choice mag LOL... UK mags are not the authority in Video, they dunno nuts about Hi-def Videos source and Tvs..leave it to the americans they define HD..
besides those are 2007 ratings.. LOL now already 2009...
what's top at that timeĀ may not even be good now..
anyway, even this 428 is called Kuro, it's a 1024x768 panel.. sorry but after having used this kind of Plasma resolution for over 3years, it's not a serious resolution for watching HD video.. kuro or not doesn't matter.
but of coz if you say this 428 is very good for astro and DVD I wouldn't argue.. but then again for 6.5k I rather have a 50 inch 80series Panasonic plasma with 1366x768 resolution.. now that would be a HD capable panel.
Sorry if i jump on ur nerve. besides those are 2007 ratings.. LOL now already 2009...
what's top at that timeĀ may not even be good now..
anyway, even this 428 is called Kuro, it's a 1024x768 panel.. sorry but after having used this kind of Plasma resolution for over 3years, it's not a serious resolution for watching HD video.. kuro or not doesn't matter.
but of coz if you say this 428 is very good for astro and DVD I wouldn't argue.. but then again for 6.5k I rather have a 50 inch 80series Panasonic plasma with 1366x768 resolution.. now that would be a HD capable panel.
Yes, those are magazines reviews (now they have online version). You want to know why i go for magazines rather than those "institutions" that you so called "have the authority". It simply because it cater for the mass opinions through usage and reviews in one personal home/experience. It gave you the "normal user" perspective, having experience the product. It uses products that the masses like u and me would use, in a normal environment - not in some dark room with special cable and google.!!
To say that they in UK doesnt know squat about hi-def Video source is like saying YOU are a FOOL.
And yes, i was sceptical when i first knew about Kuro being 1024x768. But after i demoed it and compared my personal experince with other people opinion/input (online mag being the cheapest/fastest source now), I concured that even with that hated resolution of yours, it still the BEST Flat TV outhere - not to mention the latest 9th gens. You may be have a bad experience with that kind of resolution - but hey mind sharing what model lasma u used for 3 years? Maybe i can google its past review. But to say that all those people in the mags are putting rubbish into their mags?? Well i let other be the judge of your statement.
I've nothings again the Yanks. I like some of the reviews, but the little differences e.g: voltage ( and they drive on the right side of the road) put me off a bit. Maybe my upbringing was more UK-oriented ( and I know they make/have high standard for AV, mind you), hence I like to source for UK reviews.
Coming back to the point you made - Yes, that was 2007/2008 award. Why did i point u to that.. It simply because now the price of Kuro is "affordable" and "competitive". No point talking about the best product if it cost a bomb, right??
And we, malaysian has the opputunity to get it - somewhere else in this world ppl already enjoying the 9th gen Kuro and now talking about the 10th gens. You see how lucky we are..
And before I forget, if you bought a TOP product, no matter if it is already past 2-3 years - you'll find it better than the "latest" average. Then again we need to compare Apple v. Apple..
To suggest some one tho choose a 50pv80 over a 428xg is totally up to their choice. The mags reviews/awards are just guidences. At the end you still need to trust ur eyes and ears.
p/s: and if you wanna have a peek at the Yanks review on Kuro, be may guest...you can google it ( i'm sure a self-confess-high-tech guy like you would have no problem with google..
This post has been edited by ic-klass: Jan 11 2009, 08:37 PM
Jan 11 2009, 08:27 PM

Quote
0.0219sec
0.58
6 queries
GZIP Disabled