QUOTE(ChessRook @ May 7 2021, 03:36 PM)
OFC SA is going to underperform against S&P 500 in general. SA is not a 100% equity stock portfolio and has fees that drags down the performance. SA is a balanced portfolio with bonds + gold. I don't think SA is optimise for return performance but SA's purpose is to have 99% chance that one's portfolio doesn't drop by 36% (if one choose 36% risk level) or drop by 26% (if one choose 26% risk level).
There are other asset allocation portfolio out there for example,
a) golden butterfly portfolio
https://youtu.be/RsoBIJoJduob) all-weather portfolio
https://youtu.be/PAA1cn2xgFoHere is more on SA portfolio philoshophy:
Stashaway Risk Index PurposeSpecifically, the SRI uses 99%-VaR, which means that your portfolio has a 99% chance of not losing more than the given SRI percentage in any given year. For instance, if you choose to invest RM50,000 at a 14% SRI, there’s a 99% chance that you won’t lose more than RM7,000 in a given year (RM50,000 * 14% = RM7,000). You can also say that there’s only a 1% chance that you’ll lose more than RM7,000.There is no right or wrong answer on the setup of the asset allocation portfolio. It depends on one's risk tolerance, time to retirement and so on.
QUOTE(ChessRook @ May 7 2021, 03:52 PM)
I can tell you in many years S&P 500 is going to outperform SA. S&P 500 is 100% equity stocks while SA is filled with bonds & gold etfs. Plus I am not going to mention fees vs S&p500 etfs like VOO.
See my post of SA above. SA purpose is not to max performance.
QUOTE(DragonReine @ May 7 2021, 05:35 PM)
So far better, but I'm a conservative investor and I only started a few years back

mostly blue chip dividend stocks, and I lucked out on investing in a bit of glove stocks just when it was starting to rise, all in all only 7-8% pa on average right now. Whether this stays up is another problem I'll worry about 10 years later LOLOLOL
But back on topic, I don't think SA will outperform pure equities market because it's very heavily diversified and risk-managed, which is why I said my benchmark is around EPF level haha
I learned something new now. Even as I said after 2 decades and 2 crashes, I'm still learning.
So yes, SA is unlikely to outperforming S&P500. Interesting. The new 36% RI does not. Not sure about the old one, if anyone still has the formula.

So here it says we have achieved very very similar performance and maybe a lesser pain in the max drawdown. My first thought is this is still not underperforming for sure, but at the same time perhaps a waste of fees in the long run.