Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

475 Pages « < 371 372 373 374 375 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Ryzen, AM4 / AM5 Platform

views
     
AMD64 FX51
post Feb 26 2021, 10:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(faidz85 @ Feb 26 2021, 03:17 PM)
5900x + Gigabyte X570 Pro wifi for RM3560 seems like a good deal?
*
5900x RM2599
x570 pro wifi RM1319 (but do is x570 pro wifi or i x570 pro wifi)
consider cheap
yimingwuzere
post Feb 26 2021, 11:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(JohnLai @ Feb 26 2021, 06:53 PM)
Eureka, found out the cause.

Apparently, if the IF:DRAM are set beyond 1800Mhz (3600Mhz effective for RAM), then the SOC will use 10watts more.
Is this a bug or feature?  blink.gif

What is your IF:DRAM frequency?
*
3733 RAM, guess that's why.
JohnLai
post Feb 26 2021, 11:44 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(yimingwuzere @ Feb 26 2021, 11:25 PM)
3733 RAM, guess that's why.
*
This is unexpected indeed.
IF:DRAM above 1800Mhz (3600Mhz DDR4) results in additional 10 watts. dry.gif


Anyway, for the AGESA 1201 that supposedly fix the L3 cache performance.


https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/lrf0c...he_performance/
QUOTE
AMD_Robert Technical Marketing 1 day ago ยท edited 23 hours ago

Hi, all. AGESA 1201 contains a fix specifically to improve AIDA64's L3 cache bandwidth test results, enabling this benchmark's test pattern to better show the architecture's true capabilities. It is not a generic change.

//edit: Vermeer only.

//edit 2: Text change for clarity.




Now that explain why I feel 3950x is faster than 5950x during encoding.
Reason :

3950X
Attached Image

5950X
Attached Image

My 5950x has the L3 bug.....ouch.......
sai86
post Feb 27 2021, 12:10 AM

StilL LearninG
*******
Senior Member
4,934 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Setapak


QUOTE(JohnLai @ Feb 26 2021, 11:44 PM)
This is unexpected indeed.
IF:DRAM above 1800Mhz (3600Mhz DDR4) results in additional 10 watts.  dry.gif
Anyway, for the AGESA 1201 that supposedly fix the L3 cache performance.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/lrf0c...he_performance/
Now that explain why I feel 3950x is faster than 5950x during encoding.
Reason :

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

My 5950x has the L3 bug.....ouch.......
*
whats the L3 bug cache? the recent 1.21 patch for mobo? affected by mobo or its CPU pasal?
JohnLai
post Feb 27 2021, 12:15 AM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(sai86 @ Feb 27 2021, 12:10 AM)
whats the L3 bug cache? the recent 1.21 patch for mobo? affected by mobo or its CPU pasal?
*
Sometime the L3 cache speed stuck at low speed when booting up from cold.

AMD Robert said 1201 is just a "comestic" change for aida64:

QUOTE
niglor 1 day ago
inb4 benchmarks show absolutely no performance difference

AMD_RobertTechnical Marketing 21hours ago
You're right. This was a fix only for AIDA64's test pattern.
But 3950X seems to finish x264 encoding faster than 5950x (when the L3 bug crap happened) rolleyes.gif
John Chaser
post Feb 27 2021, 06:57 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
685 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(JohnLai @ Feb 26 2021, 09:50 PM)
Listed few posts above.  sweat.gif
*
Coolermaster Hyper 212 Turbo (twin fans)

Aiyooo...uncleeeee!!!!!

Anyway tried checking stock in 2 shops at Ipoh Parade.
No Ryzen stocks.
JohnLai
post Feb 27 2021, 10:34 AM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(John Chaser @ Feb 27 2021, 06:57 AM)
Coolermaster Hyper 212 Turbo (twin fans)

Aiyooo...uncleeeee!!!!!

Anyway tried checking stock in 2 shops at Ipoh Parade.
No Ryzen stocks.
*
Can, if I follow stock settings for both 3950x and 5950x, the temperature never breach 82'C.

If I turn on PBO, confirm breach 90'C and thermal throttling starts.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 27 2021, 03:46 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(JohnLai @ Feb 27 2021, 10:34 AM)
Can, if I follow stock settings for both 3950x and 5950x, the temperature never breach 82'C.

If I turn on PBO, confirm breach 90'C and thermal throttling starts.
*
What's the clockspeeds and power consumption when PBO is off/on?
x800
post Feb 27 2021, 05:03 PM

Stalking LYN since 2002
***
Junior Member
442 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Segamat--Nilai


JohnLai I'm interested in your observations on the idle SOC Power usage.

When you tested IF 1800mhz vs higher that consumed more than 10w difference, did you keep the VSOC constant?

My observation that while keeping VSOC at 1.0v, 1800mhz IF vs 1833Mhz only used 1 more watt, but that VSOC is remotely stable, lots of WHEAs lol)

I saved two profiles for myself:
1. mem 3733, IF 1866, vsoc 1.1, idles around 13w
2. mem 3600, IF 1800, vsoc 1.0, idles around 8w

With the first profile, my 5600x allcore boosts less in CB20 than second profile since the 5w of the powerbudget is used by the soc (I keep PBO limits AMD stock values)
Bonchi
post Feb 27 2021, 05:14 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(sai86 @ Feb 27 2021, 12:10 AM)
whats the L3 bug cache? the recent 1.21 patch for mobo? affected by mobo or its CPU pasal?
*
Agesa punya pasal. AMD makes good chip, but the agesa is crap.
JohnLai
post Feb 27 2021, 07:20 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(yimingwuzere @ Feb 27 2021, 03:46 PM)
What's the clockspeeds and power consumption when PBO is off/on?
*
Around 30-40watts extra when PBO is on.
Of course the average clock speed for both CPU are higher when PBO is turned on. Throttling back and forth at 90'C.


QUOTE(x800 @ Feb 27 2021, 05:03 PM)
JohnLai I'm interested in your observations on the idle SOC Power usage.

When you tested IF 1800mhz vs higher that consumed more than 10w difference, did you keep the VSOC constant?

My observation that while keeping VSOC at 1.0v, 1800mhz IF vs 1833Mhz only used 1 more watt, but that VSOC is remotely stable, lots of WHEAs lol)

I saved two profiles for myself:
1. mem 3733, IF 1866, vsoc 1.1, idles around 13w
2. mem 3600, IF 1800, vsoc 1.0, idles around 8w

With the first profile, my 5600x allcore boosts less in CB20 than second profile since the 5w of the powerbudget is used by the soc (I keep PBO limits AMD stock values)
*
The SOC voltage for 3733 (1866) and 3600 (1800) are kept constant at 1.1v (Hwinfo reports it as 1.081v) for 5950x (x570). Gigabyte default auto to 1.2V, I reduced it to 1.1V.
Strange, right? laugh.gif

I think your observation is correct (the bolded part) too, cause 5950x has 2 CCDs while 5600x only has 1 CCD (unless if you got 5600x with 2 CCDs)
5W extra on 3733 (1866) on one CCD. 2 CCDs X 5W = 10Watt.

10W + 8W [the base power consumption at 3600 (1800)] = 18w. More or less same with idle SOC power consumption of 19w.


edit:
Conclusion, even though ZEN 2 and ZEN 3 are using same IO die, for some unknown reason, AMD decided to pump more power (amperage) into the SOC for ZEN 3 series beyond 3600 (1800IF)

edit2: 3950x = I OC to 3733 (1866 IF) and it doesn't exhibit the higher SOC power consumption at idle.

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Feb 27 2021, 07:31 PM
x800
post Feb 27 2021, 07:38 PM

Stalking LYN since 2002
***
Junior Member
442 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Segamat--Nilai


Ah yes i forgot u're using 5800x. In the end our findings converge thumbup.gif

IMHO idle should be idle i.e. IF should downclock at idle, like how Intel's uncore freq downclocks at idle

AMD really have quite a way to go on fixing these things which might not be apparent to the end user, unless the end user looks for it
JohnLai
post Feb 27 2021, 08:23 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(x800 @ Feb 27 2021, 07:38 PM)
Ah yes i forgot u're using 5800x. In the end our findings converge thumbup.gif

IMHO idle should be idle i.e. IF should downclock at idle, like how Intel's uncore freq downclocks at idle

AMD really have quite a way to go on fixing these things which might not be apparent to the end user, unless the end user looks for it
*
Indeed.....though I still wonder what is AMD rational on pumping more power into ZEN 3 SOC. hmm.gif
I mean the official DDR4 supported speed for ZEN 3 is still same 3200Mhz as ZEN 2 after all.

When I look at ZEN 2 3950x 3733 (1866) SOC power usage (6-8W) at idle, I kinda bangwall.gif

Power consumption of additional 10w idle on 24/7 ;
(10w/1000) x 24 hours x 365 days = 87.6 kwh. Around RM20 per year. hmm.gif

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Feb 27 2021, 08:24 PM
Bonchi
post Feb 27 2021, 08:30 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(JohnLai @ Feb 27 2021, 08:23 PM)
Indeed.....though I still wonder what is AMD rational on pumping more power into ZEN 3 SOC.  hmm.gif
I mean the official DDR4 supported speed for ZEN 3 is still same 3200Mhz as ZEN 2 after all.

When I look at ZEN 2 3950x 3733 (1866) SOC power usage (6-8W) at idle, I kinda  bangwall.gif

Power consumption of additional 10w idle on 24/7 ;
(10w/1000) x 24 hours x 365 days = 87.6 kwh. Around RM20 per year. hmm.gif
*
the rational is probably to keep the cpu running stable. As you look back at the first few agesa versions where some of the zen3 getting alot of WHEA or couldnt even boot with 1600 IF.
Jedi
post Feb 27 2021, 08:56 PM

Pax Et Bonum
*******
Senior Member
2,245 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
Still talking about stability after 2 weeks nv enter here. Lol
Bonchi
post Feb 27 2021, 10:38 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(Jedi @ Feb 27 2021, 08:56 PM)
Still talking about stability after 2 weeks nv enter here. Lol
*
Well... intel is using a very mature architecture afterall, so I am really curious to see how the rocketlake will fare when it launch. This is also why I got a 10th gen first so it can be a spare when I have issues with 11th gen. Learnt my lesson with Ryzen lol.
timeonce
post Feb 28 2021, 07:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
282 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
Hi all,

Sorry for asking a noob question. I realise my AMD5950x is always running at 4.5ghz. Is it good that it is always running so high clock as i see it not running at base clock. As my temp is 68 degree and kinda worry about it.


How do i make it slower for daily usage and to boost clock when I use extensive task. As worry CPU gg.

But nontherless. AMD is damn good. I run it at 100% performance for 72 hours straight and zero issue with it during my simulation task.


Attached Image
senzr
post Feb 28 2021, 08:32 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
8 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(timeonce @ Feb 28 2021, 07:57 AM)
But nontherless. AMD is damn good. I run it at 100% performance for 72 hours straight and zero issue with it during my simulation task.
Attached Image
*
Wow, what monitoring software is that? Looks pretty slick!
Vincent6596
post Feb 28 2021, 09:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
472 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
From: Penang



QUOTE(senzr @ Feb 28 2021, 08:32 AM)
Wow, what monitoring software is that? Looks pretty slick!
*
this is msi dragon center software include along with the motherboard.
edmund_yung
post Feb 28 2021, 09:58 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,198 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Jedi @ Feb 27 2021, 08:56 PM)
Still talking about stability after 2 weeks nv enter here. Lol
*
I enjoyed reading these post pushing their system to the edge, otherwise it'll be quite boring. So keep them coming in please.

There's nothing much to talk about on a stable system, just use it for work and play that's it. A 3600 + B450 + 3200 CL16 will be very stable but it's so boring haha.

475 Pages « < 371 372 373 374 375 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0237sec    0.67    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 05:10 PM