QUOTE(imperialrealcs @ Jan 20 2007, 02:50 AM)
if u read properly, it is related (except the avatar part)
im not hinting other im a honest phone seller as i dont do such business anymore

anyhow, im talking like; they are over fascinated over cheap stuff n complaint later even after kena warning.. so who to blame then? in this case lagi worst.. if the battery is confirm not ori, then i think clareen is in deep trouble as she or her supplier might makan the battery edi
Fascinated over cheap stuff? Excuse me ????

Did you know that we have bought a Midland set from Clareen and the price is slightly cheaper from other sellers here (maybe a price difference of not more than RM10) so do you label us as cheapskates? We bought from her because she has a list of successful trades and so far nobody complaint in her thread until now. Clareen might be innocent but she should be informed of what is going on here first. I dun like to accuse people blindly without proof.
QUOTE(kaichiat82 @ Jan 20 2007, 03:12 AM)
With the given information, Shezzar you believes the seller Clareen post your item on the 12th Jan, based on postal stamp date. If it is so, you have all very rights to question one day delay in postage after completing transaction on the 9th. Clareen as a seller needs to clerify on this matter. Noted that the final chained decision we conclude here (ie Clareen need to clerify) is based on a presumptive premise(item posted on 12th). This means that if item is not post on 12th, Clareen own you no explain. This is because the premise is not true so does the conclusion.
Again, I like to say before we listen from the seller it is premature to pass any conclusive judgement.
Secondly, personally I do not know much about business ethics. Simple search with google and wikipedia, I do not see others define business ethics as you did. Of course you didnt define it explictly. I refer to what we known as implicit conclusion.
I see your propositions are generally encircles on seller's unethical conduct ie not responding to potential buyer's enquiry(general one i mean eg asking price, bargaining and etc). While I do agree seller ought to be responsive to after-sale service(like someone raise question about possible counterfeit battery, or request for consignment no for parcel) within an acceptable timeframe, my opinion is the seller has no obligation to answer all possible general enquiries.
My opinion is, the seller Clareen is not deserve with the label as an unethical merchant being too ignorant to reply general enquiry.
Cheers
I guess it's not a big offence for replying slow. Sending an order out late might not seem like a big matter unless she has personally promised the buyer that she will send out today, then that's a different story especially if the delay can cause lost of income to the affected party. Of course, lets not forget that there's one memory card not received by our fellow member here, the one sent to Rawang, instead of Penang as stated earlier in this thread.
QUOTE(satur9 @ Jan 20 2007, 03:20 AM)
Yes, I too was a bit unhappy that the battery (BST-36) had already been inserted in my Thorus set (z558i). Worse, there were black scuff marks on the battery. Imagine seeing that in what was supposed to be a brand new item--disappointing to say the least. Still, I did not complain to Clareen after I received the phone via Pos Laju as I thought maybe it's common to have some phones/batteries packaged this way,
even for original sets. Now I don't know what to think because my battery looks exactly like the AP one on page 1 of this thread. Until Clareen clarifies this situation for all of us, I won't jump to conclusions whether my battery is genuine or not.
However I will say that she needs to get her act together if she wants to be taken seriously as a reputable trader. If you've spread yourself too thin (college + business) then recruit someone to help you respond promptly to the numerous queries. "Very busy" is a lame excuse. Is this a business or a hobby? More importantly, a seller should take some responsibility for the products she is selling, disclaimer or no disclaimer. Passing the buck to the supplier who may or may not be honest is poor business practice. Make an effort to find out whether the supplier is trustworthy by personally checking the products, not just close one eye and post a disclaimer protecting yourself. What about your customers?
Going by all the favourable testimonials in her thread, it's obvious that the happiest (and no doubt smartest) customers are the ones who COD'ed with Clareen. Unfortunately I opted for the bank-in/post route (admittedly, my mistake). No matter how this all turns out, i.e. the batteries are in fact genuine, etc., this will be my first and last deal with her (there are other minor issues with the packaging and overall service from Clareen that I've not mentioned as they're not relevant to this thread).
My first SE phone (P900i) was bought from Central Square, Gurney Plaza, Penang a few years back and yeah, I paid the full price for the phone, I know you guys are getting better offers in KL but I won't be talking on that. The battery was wrapped in the original plastic, nope, not a scratch or any defects on it. The boss showed me the T-Choice hologram sticker on the battery, the IMEI on phone, box and warranty card. He practically opened every single accessory one by one for me to see and check. Yeah, very professional but when you mentioned that your Z559i Thorus set has the battery inserted into the phone with black scuff marks is totally unacceptable, even if the battery is original, is it brand new or a recond one? I guess we'll never know that and nope, Clareen is not aware of this, she just get the phones from her suppliers and send so even inside got problem also, I guess she's not aware. I dealt with her 3 times but all the 3 times, she always kelam-kabut one, she either forgot to sms me the tracking numbers or forgot to tell me when she has sent it. I of course, did sms her, if she didn't reply, last resort call her until she answers. I know it's a minor thing lah because I did get my phones from her at last.
COD is not 100% safe either, sometimes we tend to overlook the tiny little details when we're too excited to see our phone in the flesh. It happens for COD, don't deny it guys, it happens, right? We're humans after all.
QUOTE(6GDominator @ Jan 20 2007, 03:33 AM)
oops. sorry man. i am using the W810i but the battery has the same model right? if yes then i think it is fake one gua.

W810i is using BST-37 my friend but if your battery looks like mine, 100%, then chances are that your battery is a fake too. Please check and give us your feedback ya.