Its fully syn and free

look at the buyers at the price range. 125k and above. majority of them will not wan to drive a manual.

DSG would be nice Fiesta also can offered twin clutch GB with less than 100k price tag.

good to know, thanks


i'm driving a manual now..

it's normal to expect the CVT to lose out a bit on performance in return for easiness, but it can't be THAT bad right?

or is it THAT bad?

Mitsu's CVT is not on par with other brand's CVT such as Nissan's on the slyphyl , even honda jazz's cvt perform better

No 1 want to lend Mitsu DSG technology. If got, then means the lancer will cost you 140k++, a very impactful 10k+ for the dsg.

u kidding? read 1st bro, read 1st

Nissan's CVT is also made by Jatco, which is the same with mitsu

jazz's CVT performs better as there arent any torque converter.

This post has been edited by ckk125: Nov 21 2010, 06:30 PM

made by the same company doesnt mean the same thing issit? but nevertheless the CVT fails in "The Fantastic Sports Machine"
in the Sylphyl it does not matter coz its design n purpose as a comfort car..

http://www.jatco.co.jp/ENGLISH/CVT/JF011E.html

---

Added on November 21, 2010, 6:54 pmbro, i read elsewhere that CVT transmissions, can give variable results when it comes to dyno due to the variable transmission. but im not too sure about this

http://forums.evolutionm.net/lancer-engine...-dyno-list.html

look at the dyno on D..

CVT transmission

kmxxbadboy - 2008 GTS, unknown Fed or PZEV (lives in NJ, so most likely PZEV)
Modifications:NONE

Multiple runs (HP then TQ):
"3rd gear" - 113.89 115.72 & 119.13 118.35
"D" - 126.77 116.59
on DynoJet dynamometer
(Click here for graph.)
Read more at http://forums.evolutionm.net/lancer-engine...?ktrack=kcplink

This post has been edited by ckk125: Nov 21 2010, 06:59 PM

Make sense since the gear which the dyno are done is the one that has 1:1 ratio with the engine (usually 3rd fro MT and 2 for AT) and since CVT is continuous, the GB will keep changing gears to give it the best ratio. IMO, the correct readout is the one with CVT locked at 3rd gears compared with the D.

This post has been edited by sphiroth: Nov 21 2010, 07:42 PM

i drove it not just empty talk, fast go 180km/h then cannot up, how to say??

They forgot here is "Malaysia Boleh", anything also boleh put turbo!

CVT for comfort, yeah agreed, but here is Malaysia, anything also BOLEH when comes to modding.

It's really rare, yeah true, but when it comes to Mitsubishi, ppl prefer manual, i guess they have made wrong decision.

For majority, it is not that bad, but for me since i'm not one of the majority, yes it is bad.

Jazz CVT better, agreed.

Agreed.

I also drove it and can reach 210kmh, how to say? If it is a speed cut, once you reached 180kmh, speedometer will automatically rejected and it will go down and up, it is not speed cut, you just donno how to push it to the max.

This post has been edited by rewlie: Nov 21 2010, 08:48 PM

bro..LGT can go up to 220+ la bro..

This post has been edited by FrostLance: Nov 21 2010, 08:51 PM

Yeah, true..

I rather drive the 2.0 4b11 Cvt tranny rather than 1.8 manual (4b10) tranny to enjoy a comfortable ride 1st. After 2 years later on, might convert to manual tranny with a BOT..

Fyi, the SA told me that the car are without any speedcut ..

This post has been edited by Black3210: Nov 21 2010, 09:06 PM

chery vs proton

i think i'm going for cvt for comfort.. if got extra moolah, then just buy used evo 7 or impreza for fun


inspira's suspension was tuned with comfort in mind right? so going for cvt makes sense for me

Agreed, howerver after 2-4 years later, i mod my suspension and change to manual tranmission

Why not straight go for Evo halfcut.

my thought as well.. hopefully easier to get manual tranny by then

can just buy that evo for track only (forgot which thread), cheaper, & can whack kaw3 at track