Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 29 30 31 32 33 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Sager : Mobile Gaming @ Its Best

views
     
N1-C
post Mar 29 2009, 10:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
126 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Labuan/Miri


Sometimes game that does not support SLI will run poorer in SLI mode than single card mode.

Personally I would pick single card over SLI any day due to reliability/stability and Nvidia over ATI due better driver support. I've seen Nvidia and ATI's cards that are suppose to be the same in term of technical specification but ATI's perform slower due to driver instability and also the fact that most of the games in the market built on Nvidia's card.
dveHetal3
post Mar 29 2009, 11:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
253 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
Yes. Single GPU is normally more stable than dual GPUs if you are comparing GTX260M with dual 9800M GS.
nicholas88
post Mar 29 2009, 11:46 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Emm.. I never heard of this brand before. Is it popular?
Vorador
post Mar 29 2009, 11:52 AM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


Both under nVidia... now I am thinking the Clevo one which give dua GTX280m... ... dunno wants to buy it right now or just get the single GPU one first...
Darkmage12
post Mar 29 2009, 11:57 AM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

what about 4850X2?
cannavaro
post Mar 29 2009, 02:40 PM

CATTENACIO
*******
Senior Member
3,008 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: T.T.D.I, Bukit Damansara


QUOTE(nicholas88 @ Mar 29 2009, 11:46 AM)
Emm.. I never heard of this brand before. Is it popular?
*
This should answer your question:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Bankster
post Mar 29 2009, 07:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(N1-C @ Mar 29 2009, 10:38 AM)
Sometimes game that does not support SLI will run poorer in SLI mode than single card mode.

Personally I would pick single card over SLI any day due to reliability/stability and Nvidia over ATI due better driver support. I've seen Nvidia and ATI's cards that are suppose to be the same in term of technical specification but ATI's perform slower due to driver instability and also the fact that most of the games in the market built on Nvidia's card.
*
that is true, a SLI graphic card is a mix bag of performance. and a single gpu is much better performing and OCing. However a user in the notebookreview forum have a SLI 7950GTX and still can play all the latest game with higher graphic setting, this prove that SLI system can make your GPU future-proof!! but hey they are still a some game that doesnt support SLI nvidia/ATI

to me, SLI, is like a gimmick that manufacturer wishes to use in order to make the notebook look menacing like the desktop version. A notebook is still a notebook and the limitation of its component are still there and have not yet crossed the line of the desktop. it doesnt have any custom cooling system like the desktop which is a bad thing... since cooling is good to well-balance your system performance.

besides, SLI will only make your notebook lifetime shorter... well that is from my perspective. Its not like i dont like SLI, i just dont find it good for a notebook to have a SLI. Nevertheless, it does increase your performance in gaming by a lot!!! biggrin.gif thumbup.gif soo yeehaaa the graphic!! icon_idea.gif rclxm9.gif icon_idea.gif

QUOTE(cannavaro @ Mar 29 2009, 02:40 PM)
This should answer your question:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
wow, i never knew that... ahahahha blink.gif blink.gif blink.gif blink.gif

This post has been edited by Bankster: Mar 29 2009, 08:06 PM
havefun2night
post Mar 30 2009, 12:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Thanks for the excellent!! info.. thumbup.gif
Even though having a hard times understanding it a bit but i do get the ideas.. Desktop i know, notebook i know nothing much.. doh.gif
Vorador
post Apr 2 2009, 04:02 PM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


Hi guys, I think I made my decision to get the np5797, just wanna ask, for harddisk right, is that big differrent btwn 7200rpm and 5400rpm? Coz if I insist 7200rpm then the max capacity i can get is 320GB which is not so sufficient to me... ...
WyjSwmW
post Apr 2 2009, 11:22 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
862 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


I am currently using 320GB 7200RPM.. Waht i can say it is extremely when loading large files, applications, games or avi files. It takes only 0.5 secs to load a 2GB blueray ripped MKV file.

But let's say if i need further HDD, i can anytime buy a external HDD or use a e-SAta.

This post has been edited by WyjSwmW: Apr 2 2009, 11:22 PM
satan6666
post Apr 2 2009, 11:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
wow i am tempted to get a sager!
WyjSwmW
post Apr 3 2009, 12:03 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
862 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(satan6666 @ Apr 2 2009, 11:56 PM)
wow i am tempted to get a sager!
*
So, what are you waiting for?... Go for it! rclxms.gif
Vorador
post Apr 3 2009, 10:21 AM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


hey WyjSwmW bro,

are you sure it's your harddisk are fast, not your processor? notworthy.gif
000022
post Apr 3 2009, 12:08 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
761 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE
hey WyjSwmW bro,

are you sure it's your harddisk are fast, not your processor?
When loading applications and etc, the HDD speed is usually the bottleneck, and a 7.2k RPM is the fastest you can go in a laptop's world, right now of course.



This post has been edited by 22: Apr 3 2009, 12:10 PM
Vorador
post Apr 3 2009, 12:11 PM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


alright... coz i'm stuggling wanna go for 320GB 7200rpm or 500GB 5400rpm... ...
000022
post Apr 3 2009, 12:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
761 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE
alright... coz i'm stuggling wanna go for 320GB 7200rpm or 500GB 5400rpm... ...
It all depends on you, imo, with only a 180gb of difference, I'd pick the 7.2k RPM anytime. I'll get a large external drive and store everything in it. But that's just me. What about you?
N1-C
post Apr 3 2009, 02:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
126 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Labuan/Miri


IMO heat plays a role too, my 7200RPM Seagate HDD on my NP8660 peak at 67C one time when I'm backing up my Steam to my external HDD. During gaming season it normally stays around ~60C and idle at ~50C. 5400RPM HDD is cooler by a good ~10C or more.

If I were you I'll wait for more informtion on how that machine handle heat before making any further decision. My HDD is the hottest running hardware in my notebook when I'm not doing any gaming.
Vorador
post Apr 3 2009, 02:57 PM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


Erm... my target is Sager np5797... (that one come with nVidia GTX280m..., super heater huh?)
satan6666
post Apr 3 2009, 04:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
if i buy from xotc will it be a hassle?
TScorad
post Apr 4 2009, 08:16 AM

Hard to see, the dark side is.
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak / United Kingdom

QUOTE(Vorador @ Apr 2 2009, 04:02 PM)
Hi guys, I think I made my decision to get the np5797, just wanna ask, for harddisk right, is that big differrent btwn 7200rpm and 5400rpm? Coz if I insist 7200rpm then the max capacity i can get is 320GB which is not so sufficient to me... ...
*
performance between the 2 drives will only be slightly noticeable, and only during program startup as well. won't cause your games to lag or anything.

also due to the way harddisks are designed, their I/O speeds are limited by RPM & disk density. ie: a 500GB 5400RPM will be as fast as a 320GB 7200RPM smile.gif

QUOTE(N1-C @ Apr 3 2009, 02:32 PM)
IMO heat plays a role too, my 7200RPM Seagate HDD on my NP8660 peak at 67C one time when I'm backing up my Steam to my external HDD. During gaming season it normally stays around ~60C and idle at ~50C. 5400RPM HDD is cooler by a good ~10C or more.

*
i'm back in btu tongue.gif any holiday for ur uni ? smile.gif

125 Pages « < 29 30 31 32 33 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1360sec    0.56    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 03:10 PM