u really want to be included in my signature meh .. but soli la .. u r not qualified la ..
u failed in the most basic Q&A .. u smashed before ppl can answer ..
btw, u know why there is "...neer" in my signature ? u really follow ppl onli hor .. w/o knowing the underlying meaning .. haha
anyway i m glad to be included in ur signature .. hehe .. but u dont deserve getting me to spend more time on u .. haha

their modus operandi is since they dont have the business acumen to start a business and run it well and profitabilty - take short cut lah..
just grab whatever businesses are doing well and take it from there - like what the chinese would say - take someone's bottom and use it for the face.
(aiya my translation not so good lah)..yes true, they dont care if the world is watching ..after all they do it so often that its second nature to them!
mou liu toi..its mou liu toi! pathetic..

Mr. Zavier,

Not only are you intellectually challenged....You are a coward as well, arent you? Famous for diverting questions, and giving BS replies...?

The signature there dedicated as a mockery to you. You are so intellectually challenged, that I want everyone to know. Will leave it on display for a few more days lah......tribute to you mah.....

YOU ARE MY IDOL. Without Zavier - this world is so empty.

neer? I'm just following your half Ah Beng england only mah....u do understand what the term "mockery" means dont you? U can look it up at any Online dictionary since u seem to be grammar impaired as well.

Zavier..........I'm still waiting for your reply. Let me know if u need me to dumb down my questions / points, so that u can gain a clearer understanding.

This post has been edited by Phoeni_142: Oct 8 2011, 10:13 PM

@jessy n apsen,

I dont like our current GOV either but looking at SPS price the latest SW, EcoShitty or Ecopark.......seriously do you think SPS have put buyer's interest 1st?

I support anything that leads to cheaper props for all...........

---

Added on October 5, 2011, 12:11 amyet another cowardly diversion

This post has been edited by Pai: Oct 5 2011, 12:11 AM

Found this video.. after looking at this, i felt that the out of the so called 9 points danger points pointed by the RAs, only one is valid due to SW, the others are just normal criss-crossing which is already happening at the moment and you can find this every where in city, albeit the traffic condition will be compounded with the opening of SW, but that is not due to bad traffic design.

The one point for concern is how vehicle from LDP is going into SW main entrance and the effect on vehicles coming out from Persiaran Wawasan. It seems like there will be a traffic light at the junction to let vehicles into SW and out of Persiaran Wawasan. If this is the case then there will not be criss-crossing as claimed but traffic will be held up at the junction, and that is the main point.

The proposed ramp will not work coz it will clash with the pedestrian bridge...

demolish the pedestrian overpass and replace with underpass.

This post has been edited by mroys@lyn: Oct 7 2011, 07:25 AM

Agree! Good video but make not much sense...

I still feel it's not fair for MPSJ not to issue the CF due to the complaint from residents when in fact they have approved the development and traffic plan... What i feel, they are trying to make it a big issue by highlighting so called 9 blind points when in fact it is not so. If MPSJ want to reverse their decisions every time someone make complaint, there will be chaos and they will have a busy time as it is ppl's nature to complaint everything.

Precisely...
The complaint committee shd raise 1 request to MPSJ, remove Setia Walk entirely.

It is definitely a big traffic issue at the junction and the jam can cause up to IOI malls. This is really a serious issue to look into.

elevated highway for LDP is the ultimate solution to minimize traffic jam, not only Wawasan but entire Puchong.
I dun see MPSJ can do much to ease the traffic, unless the gomen build a new link to Bandar Kinrara BK5B, is only 400m-500m away

It's also not fair to the residence just because SW owners wanna get CF earlier without consideration for the traffic congestion that they might face... and complain you did!

my comment is solely on Robert Kuok, he is the all Respect! As regard SPS, if u see my comment in other thread, you know i agree it is shitty company, when PNB take over, padan muka Dato Liew, but than PNB?? even more shitty now

I agree that many "danger" points are existing situations even without SW.
But these points are still OK to accommodate the traffic flow for existing residential area if without SW.

After SW is ready here, it worsen the situation.
These "criss-crossing" situations become problems now.
So, I think that it's fair for the residents, SW and MPSJ to look into the problem before it's too late.

I would say the current chaos was caused by few parties (order by priority):
1. MPSJ should not approve the traffic plan without further study (and may be they should survey to existing residents?).
2. SPS didn't study traffic flow thoroughly when starting the development. I was informed that SPS studied the traffic flow during off-peak hour (not sure how true it is).

IMO, may be MPSJ should be responsible for the easing traffic flow tasks instead of SW because they approved it before.
MPSJ should be accountable for this approval.
Of course, real world story could be different.

Thanks, agreed on what you said. That is why i feel it's unfair for MPSJ to hold the CF on SPS's expense as they already approved the plan before construction started.

i think subway the only solution, SPS have to fund it, gov own now anyway, else no opening ceremony

MPSJ boleh ma .. it is not difficult to get approval from MPSJ by giving some duit kopi .. i cant imagine when sw opens and construction to upgrade ldp take place .. the way i see it .. like it or not, mpsj has no more reason to stop issuing cf .. but residents and everyone in puchong should continue to pressure the developer, mpsj, gov, litrak to tackle the traffic issue in puchong .. unfortunately, in this country, this is the onli way to get related parties to be held accountable ..
this sw already gets so many news before its opening ...

The jam kenot be escaped, if MPSJ stops issuing CCC to Setia Walk, wat happen to PFCC 3 new towers (including 1 hotel)??
Puchong township planning is improper, not much room to improve, a link road to Kinrara is crucial. Judging fr the traffic jam, SW is getting towards a success opening, with that Wawasan property price will increase another 10%-20% I think, if m a Wawasan owner, I would be very happy instead, worst come to worst, dispose my property and move to another place.

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Oct 7 2011, 05:37 PM

Who pay the cost for propose ramp ?? Najib ? MPSJ ? IOI ? SP ? RAs?

Yeah, true. Who pays for the ramp.
It's easy to say dispose house in wws,
try disposing your own house.
It's good that setiawalk opens as it will
increase the value of Wws houses, but I can
imagine the traffic disaster going into Wws.
Another way is to widen the road access to Bukit jalil area. Dam jam for the small lane access...