So, does this mean that puchong will be like the next USJ @ kewajipan mess?

Or u guys think that this is "normal", and setia walk pasti akan maju?

Thanks in advance for your views.
From the Star, September 12th.

Build underpass or flyover, developer urged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pusat Bandar Puchong residents want the developer of Setia Walk to build a flyover or underpass for traffic going into the new development instead of interfering with the existing traffic system.

They gathered yesterday to voice their displeasure over the proposed traffic flow, which they felt would worsen the daily congestion at the junction of Persiaran Wawasan and Damansara-Puchong Highway (LDP).

Setia Walk, which is located at this junction, is an integrated residential and commercial development comprising retail blocks, offices, an entertainment complex, service and residential apartments.

The residents had identified seven problematic points in the proposal and feared that accidents would happen with the criss-crossing traffic. Motorists turning left from Persiaran Wawasan into LDP would meet traffic heading into Setia Walk.

Vehicles from LDP into Persiaran Wawasan would meet those making a U-turn on Persiaran Wawasan to get into the commercial area in Jalan Bandar 1 and 2.

Action committee chairman Yong Siew Yung said the residents wanted an independent traffic consultant to look into the feasibility of the proposal and carry out a traffic impact assessment.

“We were told that the developer’s traffic study was done a couple of years ago at 10am and not during the peak hours.

“There will be 4,000 parking bays in Setia Walk. Imagine half of the car volume getting into the development and creating a congestion,” she said.

Shan Kok Shin, a member in the committee, said the residents’ concerns were not adequately addressed. He urged the developer, SP Setia, to stop the contruction work at the junction until all issues were resolved.

“There are proposals for two new schools here and an LRT station near Tesco Puchong. These will attract more traffic into the area and the proposed traffic system should be able to cater to all these needs,” he said.

Shan also urged the MPSJ to address the residents’ concerns before issuing Certificates of Fitness to the project.

Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo agreed with the residents that the traffic would be an absolute mess if the issues raised by the residents were not resolved.

“Puchong is known for traffic congestion and the residents are burdened with toll rates. Developers are concerned only with their projects and the traffic impact on the residents is neglected,” he said.

He added that Litrak said the congestion should be the developer’s concern but LDP should be held responsible, too.

“There need to be a combined effort by all to find solutions for the traffic problem,” he said.

Subang Jaya municipal councillor Tan Jo Hann said the council has heard and understood the residents’ concerns and it would look into the problems raised together with the Malaysian Highway Authority, SP Setia, Litrak and other authorities.

“The developer said we should try out the proposal first but the residents are already suffering without this development. We will meet the residents again next week for further discusssions,” he said.

Yong said the committee formed on Aug 22 consisted of 10 residents associations in Pusat Bandar Puchong and Bandar Puteri Puchong.

Persiaran Wawasan is our main access. There are nine apartments and five housing areas in Pusat Bandar Puchong while residents from neighbouring areas, like Bandar Puteri Puchong, also use this road to get home, too,” she said.

Yong said the water supply for SP Setia would come from the existing reservoir in Pusat Bandar Puchong and the residents were worried that they would be affected in the future.

typically businessman normally has zero patriotism.........mentality is the same.........."once I've suck you dry.........i'll cabut n go suck something else............ "
p/s : no dirty thoughts intended 

@jessy n apsen,

I dont like our current GOV either but looking at SPS price the latest SW, EcoShitty or Ecopark.......seriously do you think SPS have put buyer's interest 1st?

I support anything that leads to cheaper props for all...........

---

Added on October 5, 2011, 12:11 am
yet another cowardly diversion 

Found this video.. after looking at this, i felt that the out of the so called 9 points danger points pointed by the RAs, only one is valid due to SW, the others are just normal criss-crossing which is already happening at the moment and you can find this every where in city, albeit the traffic condition will be compounded with the opening of SW, but that is not due to bad traffic design.

The one point for concern is how vehicle from LDP is going into SW main entrance and the effect on vehicles coming out from Persiaran Wawasan. It seems like there will be a traffic light at the junction to let vehicles into SW and out of Persiaran Wawasan. If this is the case then there will not be criss-crossing as claimed but traffic will be held up at the junction, and that is the main point.

The proposed ramp will not work coz it will clash with the pedestrian bridge...

no offence, but the facilities doesnt look on par with their branding.. 0.25cent/psf looks kinna steep for maintenance fee

solace swimming pool..

play ground is not in open air...

---

Added on February 21, 2012, 12:09 am

closest estimation will be solace type c balcony (pic2).. slightly wider than the balcony width..