QUOTE(epjx31 @ Sep 6 2022, 10:47 PM)
Hi there, thanks for asking such an interesting question. I will try my best to put on my engineering cap to answer you.
1. Changing from Silverstone M3 175/70R13 to PS3 195/50R15
Your sidewall height is reduced about 55mm which should naturally means loosing comfort as more rubber on the sidewall helps you flex, however the biggest difference is you are using a PS3 top notch wet braking tire and it is of course way better than the carbon based Silverstone M3. In my opinion the grip you got comes from the compound upgrade while you having a deficit in comfort due to sidewall height.
2. Bulge
When talking about bulges you have to be careful what bulge you are talking about. Bulges which blow up like a balloon is extremely dangerous as this means you have some damage as air can push through that area to form a bulge. However I'd the bulge is in the opposite direction, (intended inside) this is totally fine as this is caused by overlapping of the ply during production. Structurally your tire is in tact and there is not safety issues.
Hope this helps
Hi TS, thank you for the response, however I think you might have gotten slightly confused here, my question on no.1 is actually not about grip or loss of comfort. More to tramlining and wobbly / squishy feel. Kindly see my original post (
below for easier reference)
I have a few questions which I hope you can assist with.
Background: Std Saga VVT using stock Silverstone M3 175/70/13 upgraded to PS3 195/50/15.
Issues: experiencing tramlining, higher body roll (likely due to softer side walls?), car isnt as composed when breaking hard either.
Only plus points seems to be grip and rather low noise, whereas with the Silverstones it was opposite (ie: higher noise, lower grip especially in the wet but the rest were fine). What gives?
QUOTE(mdziaf @ Sep 6 2022, 11:48 PM)
Just to add on to this: there are tolerances for how much indentation is allowed. Although structurally fine and safe, if noticed by the consumer, it will cause undue concerns by the end user - such as what has happened to you Vsmh. Usually these indentation falls under QC issues, and would be grounds for claims. But each manufacturers have different requirements for what is allowed and what is not, so your mileage will vary. You could try to go to a different dealer to see if they would be willing to submit a complaint on your behalf. But if your tires have already been used, don’t expect a 1-to-1 replacement.
Some times i wonder if the tire shop knew of such things (and thus took the opportunity to sell) or they really think its a safety issue.
Id agree on tolerances. Tire shop said no warranty one lah, Perodua said have but need to deal directly with manufacturer. Manufacturer (Silverstone) has kinda shut down (and they were pushing me back to Perodua), later found out they are now made and handled by Toyo tires, they were of the opinion that it was within spec and normal. All these created a perfect storm since i travel long distance and if 3/4 of my tires had a "bulge" as the tire shop called them, i was not willing to risk a single pop on the highway @ high speeds.
Just a bit of backstory, tires were within warranty period, ran for about 20K km. Now i have 4 extra tires because of this episode.
QUOTE(zeng @ Sep 7 2022, 06:54 AM)
The bold suggests that the rear alignment #s of this car is off. Bigger 15" rim size is just a camouflage imho.
In a typical Saga, the rear alignment is easily adjustable IIRC unlike rear torsion beam designs in Peroduas Vios, City etc.
Eh, i think saga is also using torsion beam so technically there shouldnt be anything to adjust. Not sure if VVT is the same as older models tho.
This post has been edited by Vsmh: Sep 7 2022, 08:46 PM