cps only euro 4 compliant n only comes with dated 4 at from mitsu n dated 5mt from mitsu which sometimes hard to shift.

There are some market of p3 will enter is euro 5 compliant.

If comparing gen2 cps manual vs p3 manual, yup, still loosing, but compare gen2 cps at vs p3 cvt, p3 is on par. U shud also pwrloss of trans n tech behind it. Not saying cps is not good, but iafm+ is better interm of drivability,unless u r hard revving kind of a guy.

P3 manual 1.6, perform not far of flx 1.3 manual. If u want to try out, try the flx 1.3 manual, is it really bad or just ok. Not the fl@blm, the newly flx that come with getrag transmission.

multilink > torsion beam

cps only euro 4 compliant n only comes with dated 4 at from mitsu n dated 5mt from mitsu which sometimes hard to shift.

There are some market of p3 will enter is euro 5 compliant.

If comparing gen2 cps manual vs p3 manual, yup, still loosing, but compare gen2 cps at vs p3 cvt, p3 is on par. U shud also pwrloss of trans n tech behind it. Not saying cps is not good, but iafm+ is better interm of drivability,unless u r hard revving kind of a guy.

P3 manual 1.6, perform not far of flx 1.3 manual. If u want to try out, try the flx 1.3 manual, is it really bad or just ok. Not the fl@blm, the newly flx that come with getrag transmission.

the iafm in this p321a is same one in proton saga se. with all the weight addition, then preeve 1.6 can smell saga 1.6 asap ekzos.

Yeah its true, at least proton should put CPS instead iafm+ to executive version..

when it comes to corners, the saga will eat asap ekzos..

unless someone will tell me torsion beam > independant la

cps only euro 4 compliant n only comes with dated 4 at from mitsu n dated 5mt from mitsu which sometimes hard to shift.

There are some market of p3 will enter is euro 5 compliant.

If comparing gen2 cps manual vs p3 manual, yup, still loosing, but compare gen2 cps at vs p3 cvt, p3 is on par. U shud also pwrloss of trans n tech behind it. Not saying cps is not good, but iafm+ is better interm of drivability,unless u r hard revving kind of a guy.

P3 manual 1.6, perform not far of flx 1.3 manual. If u want to try out, try the flx 1.3 manual, is it really bad or just ok. Not the fl@blm, the newly flx that come with getrag transmission.

WHAT?

Completely different price range-la (and not to mention platform class as well). Buyers will never compare the Saga vs Preve.

If I was buying a Preve, I would compare with the Inspira, Forte, 308T, Focus, Mazda 3, any other C-class sedan below RM110k price (reason being need to consider Proton has higher interest rate, so for the same monthly instalment, I can also afford slightly pricier foreign makes)

The keyhole is a major turn off for me. Design wise already not interesting especially the rear. Yeap, design is subjective..

cps only euro 4 compliant n only comes with dated 4 at from mitsu n dated 5mt from mitsu which sometimes hard to shift.

There are some market of p3 will enter is euro 5 compliant.

If comparing gen2 cps manual vs p3 manual, yup, still loosing, but compare gen2 cps at vs p3 cvt, p3 is on par. U shud also pwrloss of trans n tech behind it. Not saying cps is not good, but iafm+ is better interm of drivability,unless u r hard revving kind of a guy.

P3 manual 1.6, perform not far of flx 1.3 manual. If u want to try out, try the flx 1.3 manual, is it really bad or just ok. Not the fl@blm, the newly flx that come with getrag transmission.

thats the boot la...not chassis

but yeah i agree with u...still keyhole
i always imagine they can use the "logo" to be a button to open the boot like VW
since the button so big...they can turn the logo to be a button..press the logo...thn the boot opens

when it comes to corners, the saga will eat asap ekzos..

unless someone will tell me torsion beam > independant la

Ya I should be more specific. The trunk area and tail lights are not aggressive enough as newer designs tend to have bigger designs rather than narrow/small designs like this one..

Ya.. the keyhole very old design liow.. though the spec list is very competitive especially to Forte..

this one need to test 1st  
hard to speak cuz handling is good...haven't test the p3 so dn't know how the handling is like

this one need to test 1st  
hard to speak cuz handling is good...haven't test the p3 so dn't know how the handling is like

---

Added on March 15, 2012, 3:09 pm
yes..agree...old design
but i think they still use it becuz its reliable
they can use other method like the one i just said use the logo
but later ppl press press press thn spoil
rosak = basher will come bash..lol
my dad's car 10 years already...boot keyhole still perfect

or they can implement remote hood open from the remote

Wait, it's not included ? After all the fancy gadgets, they didn't ? 

owh..check back to the brochure
all variants have it

lol comparing a second hand car to a new one..
this is a failure in so many levels that i cant begin to describe

thats the boot la...not chassis

but yeah i agree with u...still keyhole
i always imagine they can use the "logo" to be a button to open the boot like VW
since the button so big...they can turn the logo to be a button..press the logo...thn the boot opens

actually i'm comparing in term of price. 2nd hand 1.6 forte is not so old. just 2.5 years only with low mileage you can get at 60K+ nowadays.

and 1.6 forte do got esc, which only premium preeve have it.  im just trying to compare things thoroughly. correct if im wrong