QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 2 2011, 01:06 AM)
Faster than on D700 and below
And to be honest, that guy use stop watch to calculate.
Do you guys need that micro second to capture a scene ? Be practical
Those micro second different is actually NOTICEABLE *laugh*
Added on February 2, 2011, 1:09 amAnd taking Tammy into this is even a big laughter
Sorry, no offense but I just can't help myself giggle at those keep on complaining on the micro second slow focusing speed which actually means nothing when you're not shooting sports !
Not sure about microseconds; From what I can tell, the D is noticeable faster than the G for 50mm. And to be honest, that guy use stop watch to calculate.
Do you guys need that micro second to capture a scene ? Be practical
Those micro second different is actually NOTICEABLE *laugh*
Added on February 2, 2011, 1:09 amAnd taking Tammy into this is even a big laughter
Sorry, no offense but I just can't help myself giggle at those keep on complaining on the micro second slow focusing speed which actually means nothing when you're not shooting sports !
but for the 80-200mm AF-D vs 80-200 AF-S or 70-200 AF-S, there is notable differences.
True, the focusing speed depends on situations; for capturing moments, it's quite important, but more important is the accuracy of the focus. No point being fast then HUNT, LoL! or fast, but didn't lock on accurately.
The fast focusing is also useful for moving subject, especially shooting events like Weddings, kids at parties, etc. For those using AF-C mode, it's also quite important that the lens can focus fast enough continuously AND accurately.
Anyway, not saying the focusing speed is slow as in really slow, but comparing with much faster of the same version. There're those that is really slow focus, like the 55-200/55-300.
Added on February 2, 2011, 1:19 am
QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 2 2011, 01:14 AM)
I've used 50mm 1.4G many times before and to me i dont see the problem with the focusing speed. Probably because the i use it as a general purpose lens + for low light, not sports 
Yeah, it's not a problem, even for moving subjects, kids, etc. It's fast enough; just the AFS was slower than the AFD counterpart for the 50mm or certain AFS lens. But 70-200, that is blazing fast.
Nonetheless, it's really not a problem and it does it's job well.
This post has been edited by Andy214: Feb 2 2011, 01:19 AM
Feb 2 2011, 01:16 AM

Quote


0.0323sec
0.31
6 queries
GZIP Disabled