U already 500Mbps RM79. Check ur bill la. No ISP offer standalone 500Mbps@RM79. Or why not just terminate (not change) & register Allo 1000Mbps RM139 or 100Mbps RM49.

Oh wow, so I've been wasting money then calling the "local" hotline.
Thanks for the tip

Call ur own mobile number, answer it for a few minutes or just call TNB 15454 but not TM 100. Call TNB 15454 will charge u.

This post has been edited by hsbb: Jun 18 2025, 11:10 PM

Look. Let's not be dramatic.
If you go and do a speedtest with CGNAT and without CGNAT, what's the difference between the ping time?

I would say they are all within margin of error of a shared network.

But let's say you really want to do the math, I say worst case CGNAT has a 2ms additional delay, you need a 500Hz gaming monitor to render that 1 additional frame.

Tell me you have a 500 Hz monitor.

CGNAT either run on dedicated service module or DPDK if running on off the shelf CPU. What's the time it takes to do a hashmap lookup? They are in micro-second.

I suspect your Windows Defender took more time to scan your game.

how fast the ping touch n go wu wu want? 500mbps everyday 1ms? i no play those sensitive internet game, i no idea what different with speed test result

We were talking about other things.

Both remote login, not local.

Well blame Unifi system for allowing 500mbps stand alone registration. Like I said before, who own the infra have great power, can set any price they want. Other ISP like Maxis, Celcomdigi Astro etc can only complain but nothing will happen.
Those who still want to try your luck, better do it before they end registration for all Tmpoint.

Bro, what lah your statement.

As kwss put it, at most you will have 1-5ms extra ping to servers.

I’ve been on 30Mbps CGNAT, and currently I’m on 2Gbps. My ping on Valorant to Riot SG’s AWS servers back during 30Mbps is around 14-16ms, now on 2Gbps, it’s around 10-13. I’m based in Johor just fyi. But even that is inconsistent as it’s depending on the end point, some servers was good some servers was bad.

But that doesn’t really matter with CGNAT, you think TM hasn’t done any optimization to their connection to serve end users? End users would be mad as hell if they’re deploying CGNAT without proper routing internally as the lower tier subscribers all be experiencing degraded connectivity and experience. And generally a normal user won’t be able to tell any difference if they’re under CGNAT or dynamic.

Personally the only issue I’ve found with CGNAT is more susceptible to CAPTCHA as some others users sharing the same public IP might have been abusing the IP, hence making other users face more CAPTCHA. Other than that, it’s basically the same experience as the higher tier plans from TM.

Yes, I agree. The fact about how fast the end point took time to reply as in end to end principal that the server (host) have more responsible about congestion control, not the network.

* Jacobson & Karels algorithm

This post has been edited by hsbb: Jun 19 2025, 10:32 AM

Unifi sales system should be blamed not unifi network system. Network ownership never related with bundle or standalone package i.e astro 500Mbps RM90 or RM139. Any sides the sales related either system or dept who control prices etc. For this 500Mbps@RM90 thing, as usual the sales will blame the software because have options to change plan, but also will blame software if no options to change plan when relate to vip case.. fak.

So, what was the "original" SWU 5.0?

RM139, free 6 month
Not RM90 no free 6 month

Can read back whole thread if you got free time

sos : https://www.threads.com/@naura4.____/post/DLEJI0NSNI7

How to stay portal log in? Default is tick for no OTP, but everytime open website still need log in

I just change my unifi plan to 500mbps and they replace my model to Skyworth GN630V and bridge my Asus BE86U to it. How can I access the GN630V when it is set to bridge mode?

Connect another cable to another LAN port and configure manual IP on your PC

Unifi Home 800Mbps - Pro Upgrade

What's the cheapest price?

The IP is it follow back the IP from the label under that modem? 192.168.0.1 ?