Unifi Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V42, READ 1ST PAGE FOR RELEVANT WIFI INFO!
|
|
 Jul 30 2024, 12:24 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4061
|
 
Junior Member
701 posts Joined: Oct 2009 
|
QUOTE(kcl2006ch @ Jul 28 2024, 11:28 PM) all SWU package need bundle with unifi mobile sim card, minimum RM39 , the sim card can be terminate after the ONR replacement I see, but wat is ONR replacement sir? Btw, can we ask for new router Currently im at 500mb rm129 Thinking to renew sWU for rm79 with 100mb But i hope to get a new router |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 01:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,440 posts Joined: Sep 2021 
|
QUOTE(Leroi2x @ Jul 30 2024, 12:24 PM) I see, but wat is ONR replacement sir? you still like free new router TM hahaha will be unstable don't be complaint Btw, can we ask for new router Currently im at 500mb rm129 Thinking to renew sWU for rm79 with 100mb But i hope to get a new router you want downgrade RM79 100Mb you get private IP don't be complaint |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 02:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
6,796 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kuala Lumpur 
|
QUOTE(tng55 @ Jul 30 2024, 01:48 PM) you still like free new router TM hahaha will be unstable don't be complaint Not everyone rich to pay for 500mbps.you want downgrade RM79 100Mb you get private IP don't be complaint |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 02:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4064
|
Senior Member
2,399 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: /dev/null
|
QUOTE(kwss @ Jul 30 2024, 03:53 AM) Anime4000, I continue to look into your problem. This very comprehensive report.Knowing they peer at Equinix SG, I use Equinix Looking Glass: https://lg.equinixmetal.com/ As you can see it go straight to AS133210 EN Technologies Pte Ltd > AS135134 Soon Keat Neo CODE BGP routing table entry for 2403:cfc0:1100::/48 Paths: (6 available, best #6, table default) Not advertised to any peer 8966 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Community: 8966:41 8966:8888 Large Community: 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 6, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Large Community: 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 5, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Large Community: 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 3, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 4637 8966 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 150, valid, internal Community: 4637:32023 4637:32304 4637:32501 4637:60952 Large Community: 54825:5007:4000 54825:5007:4009 AddPath ID: RX 4, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Wed Jul 24 02:03:11 2024 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.8) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Community: 24115:65023 Large Community: 24115:1000:2 24115:1001:1 24115:1002:1 24115:1003:1 24115:1004:133210 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 Originator: 86.109.14.8, Cluster list: 86.109.14.7 AddPath ID: RX 1, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:19:22 2024 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal, best (Router ID) Community: 24115:65023 Large Community: 24115:1000:2 24115:1001:1 24115:1002:2 24115:1003:1 24115:1004:133210 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 2, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 A traceroute from the Looking Glass confirms it: CODE traceroute to 2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2 (2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2), 15 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 fe80:31::1%bond0 (fe80:31::1%bond0) [*] 0.165 ms 2 fc00:da:0:d::2b (fc00:da:0:d::2b) [*] 0.157 ms 3 fc00:da:0:d::f (fc00:da:0:d::f) [*] 0.543 ms 4 133210-sg1-ix.equinix.com (2001:de8:4::13:3210:1) [*] 1.057 ms <--- egress interface AS133210 EN Technologies Pte Ltd 5 2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2 (2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2) [AS135134] 1.047 ms Now that we have confirmed nothing is wrong with Etisalat (they are never meant to carry the traffic) and Equinix, plus the fact that it works on Celcom, it must be TM. EDIT: I have narrowed down the problem to the peering between AS4788 TM and AS132337 Axclusive. All IPv6 traffic meant for AS132337 Axclusive will end up getting dumped into Etisalat. IPv4 works fine. I am also not sure why TM never send traffic directly to AS133210 EN Technologies when all of them peer with Equinix route server. Even when IPv4 route fine, it go an extra hop to Axclusive instead of directly to EN Technologies. I think your next step is limited. Your friend might have more option since he has an IP Transit relationship with his upstream. Maybe get him to file a complaint? His upstream (AS133210 EN Technologies) will then file another complain to upstream (AS132337 Axclusive) None of these people has a Looking Glass so I think for now there is nothing more to investigate. EDIT 2: I have high confidence 2001:e68::e:fd0b is physically located in Etisalat SmartHub Fujairah. So this is the root cause of all the problem. TM egress the traffic physically in UAE and not Singapore. EDIT 3: I root cause Etisalat IPv6 routing loop problem. It's a configuration error where the next hop address is the same as the loopback address. That guy must be half asleep and mix up the ssh session of different router. CODE BGP neighbor is 2001:8f8::36, remote AS 8966, local AS 8966, internal link BGP version 4, remote router ID 195.229.0.36 BGP state = Established, up for 51w0d13h Last read 00:00:00, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Neighbor capabilities: 4 Byte AS: advertised and received Route refresh: advertised and received(old & new) Address family IPv4 Unicast: advertised Address family IPv6 Unicast: advertised and received Message statistics: Inq depth is 0 Outq depth is 0 Sent Rcvd Opens: 1 1 Notifications: 0 0 Updates: 0 205308908 Keepalives: 511403 7 Route Refresh: 0 1 Capability: 0 0 Total: 511404 205308917 Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds For address family: IPv4 Unicast Community attribute sent to this neighbor(both) Outbound path policy configured Route map for outgoing advertisements is *deny-out 0 accepted prefixes For address family: IPv6 Unicast Community attribute sent to this neighbor(both) 209412 accepted prefixes Connections established 1; dropped 0 Last reset never Local host: 2001:8f8:0:10:0:22:209:2, Local port: ??? Foreign host: 2001:8f8::36, Foreign port: ??? Nexthop: 195.229.3.210 Nexthop global: 2001:8f8:0:10:0:22:209:2 Nexthop local: :: BGP connection: non shared network Read thread: on Write thread: off Your problem will be fixed if either: 1. TM don't egress in UAE 2. Etisalat put the correct IPv6 address in their next hop I have asked my friend about Route issue, and I have verify with my another friend who use TIME and indeed route is correct. I also send this report to MCMC along with IPv6 /60 NPTv6/NAT66 issue hell, just now MCMC called me, my report sub category going to change to "Service Delivery". So proper team will investigate that TM did not fulfill RFC 6177 and blocking NPTv6/NAT66 Update kwss Do you think there is hope to have proper IPv6? MCMC just updated and I mention about ISP can get free IPv6 subnet  This post has been edited by Anime4000: Jul 30 2024, 03:19 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 05:09 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4065
|
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Feb 2013 From: Wilayah Persekutuan, KL
|
Quote
Dear xxxxxxx, No issue at network as speedtest achieved above 90%. Please manage user accordingly. Unquote Sent by "someone" in TM to my technician's supervisor. This is with regards to a potential OLT situation limiting unifi 1gbps users to 930/940mbps. Guess who's going to MCMC now 😇 |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 05:31 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4066
|
|
Senior Member
2,608 posts Joined: Nov 2020
|
QUOTE(Verblassen @ Jul 30 2024, 05:09 PM) Quote The truth is, I doubt MCMC can do muchDear xxxxxxx, No issue at network as speedtest achieved above 90%. Please manage user accordingly. Unquote Sent by "someone" in TM to my technician's supervisor. This is with regards to a potential OLT situation limiting unifi 1gbps users to 930/940mbps. Guess who's going to MCMC now 😇 blacktubi had their experience fighting with them regarding Maxis 1Gbps Though, 940Mbps is the limit for Gigabit Ethernet So, if you're not using 2.5Gbps Ethernet, 940Mbps is expected |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 05:32 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4067
|
 
Elite
8,402 posts Joined: Jul 2008 
|
QUOTE(PRSXFENG @ Jul 30 2024, 05:31 PM) The truth is, I doubt MCMC can do much Well, TM is not doing anything wrong. MCMC rules is 90%.blacktubi had their experience fighting with them regarding Maxis 1Gbps Though, 940Mbps is the limit for Gigabit Ethernet So, if you're not using 2.5Gbps Ethernet, 940Mbps is expected Even for UnifiBiz they won't care as long as it's 90% since there's not really a SLA. simmarjit liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 05:33 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4068
|
|
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Feb 2013 From: Wilayah Persekutuan, KL
|
QUOTE(PRSXFENG @ Jul 30 2024, 05:31 PM) The truth is, I doubt MCMC can do much Hopefully something can be done. I'm using 2.5gbe all the way - dlink black box and router that supports 2.5gbe WAN.blacktubi had their experience fighting with them regarding Maxis 1Gbps Though, 940Mbps is the limit for Gigabit Ethernet So, if you're not using 2.5Gbps Ethernet, 940Mbps is expected |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 05:41 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4069
|
|
Senior Member
1,280 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Verblassen @ Jul 30 2024, 05:33 PM) Hopefully something can be done. I'm using 2.5gbe all the way - dlink black box and router that supports 2.5gbe WAN. Our current minister not strong to defend the consuner compared to gobind time, really disappointed. Not much we can do |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 05:50 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4070
|
|
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Feb 2013 From: Wilayah Persekutuan, KL
|
QUOTE(enduser @ Jul 30 2024, 05:41 PM) Our current minister not strong to defend the consuner compared to gobind time, really disappointed. Quite sucky as there is another user with an identical setup as mine, able to enjoy 1gbps + a few extra %.Not much we can do I will try my luck though. Would have subscribed to 500mbps if I knew thus was an issue that plagues users lol. I wanted to see the 1000 mbps on my Speedtest 🥲 |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 06:07 PM
|
|
Junior Member
36 posts Joined: Apr 2019
|
QUOTE(soonwai @ Jul 30 2024, 10:32 AM) Want to get FSU also so susah. Anyway today got update. Randomly checked My Orders and saw something appeared dated 3 days ago. Good for you. Just got off live chat (waiting time about 3 hours) with TM, and was basically told to wait for TM to do the upgrade batch by batch, citing the lack of devices (no stock) to support the 1Gbps speed. 20240707: Live chat for FSU 20240711: TM call to accept TnC. 20240719: 2 missed calls from TM 20240727: Modify Package order created. Current status "Order is in progress" OK, back to waiting. Still July. There is no incentive for TM to upgrade the 800Mbps users to 1Gbps. Regular 1Gbps paid RM259, but 800Mbps paid much less. If one were to choose to upgrade to the RM259 plan, the "device" to support 1Gbps would appear to be in stock. It is all about $$$ for TM. At this point, I'm considering downgrading to RM79 100Mbps or take the SWU RM159 1Gbps (after 24 months 500Mbps, price remains at RM159) plan. Seem pointless to wait for something that probably drags on till the end of next year. |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 06:46 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4072
|
|
Senior Member
1,280 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(iotbot000 @ Jul 30 2024, 06:07 PM) Good for you. Just got off live chat (waiting time about 3 hours) with TM, and was basically told to wait for TM to do the upgrade batch by batch, citing the lack of devices (no stock) to support the 1Gbps speed. Got the upgraded 1gbps after open ticket at mcmc, There is no incentive for TM to upgrade the 800Mbps users to 1Gbps. Regular 1Gbps paid RM259, but 800Mbps paid much less. If one were to choose to upgrade to the RM259 plan, the "device" to support 1Gbps would appear to be in stock. It is all about $$$ for TM. At this point, I'm considering downgrading to RM79 100Mbps or take the SWU RM159 1Gbps (after 24 months 500Mbps, price remains at RM159) plan. Seem pointless to wait for something that probably drags on till the end of next year. Use back old huawei btu, afraid the white one got issue as mention by others So far so good, Appreciate the 500mbps upload speed,very nice |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 07:02 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4073
|
Senior Member
4,456 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
is this what you guys were talking about the other day?
https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/30/mala...net_killswitch/  This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 30 2024, 07:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 07:50 PM
|
Junior Member
586 posts Joined: Mar 2006
|
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Jul 30 2024, 07:02 PM) is this what you guys were talking about the other day? We knows they're already testing dns poisoning.https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/30/mala...net_killswitch/ Must be some plot behind it, and you know someone very famous with "kill switch". #Winter is coming #Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 07:59 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4075
|
|
Senior Member
4,456 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Kadaj @ Jul 30 2024, 07:50 PM) We knows they're already testing dns poisoning. Putin? Must be some plot behind it, and you know someone very famous with "kill switch". #Winter is coming #Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.  https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/202...e-and-election/ QUOTE It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. -Aristotle Wouldn't using a VPN solve this? If before people weren't sure, now is more sure that is what you have to do going onwards  This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 30 2024, 08:06 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 08:42 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4076
|
Junior Member
670 posts Joined: May 2019 
|
 |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 09:11 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4077
|
|
Senior Member
2,608 posts Joined: Nov 2020
|
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Jul 30 2024, 07:59 PM) Wouldn't using a VPN solve this? If before people weren't sure, now is more sure that is what you have to do going onwards Most of the general public (that aren't on this forum) wouldn't know how to do thatAnd they cost money for the good ones And they could implement attempts at blocking VPN usage It is also a bit of a hassle as some apps will refuse to work behind a VPN |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 09:56 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4078
|
Senior Member
1,189 posts Joined: Sep 2018
|
3 months after of upgraded 1Gbps speed changed black box back to Fiberhome modem this is what 90% of speeds get..
Looks like we won't get full 1Gbps speed from TM anyday. Just to drop 800mbps from package they increased upload speeds and selling as 1gbps plan Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 10:25 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4079
|
|
Junior Member
932 posts Joined: Dec 2019
|
QUOTE(NagaK @ Jul 30 2024, 09:56 PM) 3 months after of upgraded 1Gbps speed changed black box back to Fiberhome modem this is what 90% of speeds get.. Looks like we won't get full 1Gbps speed from TM anyday. Just to drop 800mbps from package they increased upload speeds and selling as 1gbps plan  Testing via WiFi not exactly indicative  |
|
|
Jul 30 2024, 10:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4080
|
|
Senior Member
1,189 posts Joined: Sep 2018
|
QUOTE(yenchenje @ Jul 30 2024, 10:25 PM) Testing via WiFi not exactly indicative |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0210sec
 0.59
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 06:34 AM |
Quote