Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V42

Lowyat.NET forums

Lowyat.NET Kopitiam Garage Sales

Lowyat.NET Rules and Regulations FAQ Help Search Members

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Lowyat.NET -> Networks and Broadband

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

495 Pages « < 201 202 203 204 205 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Unifi Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V42, READ 1ST PAGE FOR RELEVANT WIFI INFO!

views

kerolzarmyfanboy	Jul 29 2024, 12:55 PM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4041
On my way Junior Member 575 posts Joined: Feb 2013	TM technician came this morning & just replaced my old ONU with the Fibrehome HG6145F3, might as well, since still under warranty anyway. guy was puzzled as well as to why so many disconnections when he read the logs haha. but could confirm fibre is fine, so problem could just be between my router and the old ONU, could be just the LAN cable between the two devices even. he just ended up replace the whole thing with HG6145F3 and just disconnect my old router as well. let's see if that might've solved the intermittent disconnect issue, will monitor. gonna use my old router as repeater for 2nd floor. and now I have another new minor problem since the new Fibrehome installed; for some reason, even after changing DNS to Google DNS & flush computer's DNS, some websites still blocked for me. especially the torrent ones have changed dns on the router too. weird.
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

budi1413	Jul 29 2024, 01:33 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4042
Regular Senior Member 1,607 posts Joined: Aug 2013	QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Jul 29 2024, 12:55 PM) TM technician came this morning & just replaced my old ONU with the Fibrehome HG6145F3, might as well, since still under warranty anyway. guy was puzzled as well as to why so many disconnections when he read the logs haha. but could confirm fibre is fine, so problem could just be between my router and the old ONU, could be just the LAN cable between the two devices even. he just ended up replace the whole thing with HG6145F3 and just disconnect my old router as well. let's see if that might've solved the intermittent disconnect issue, will monitor. gonna use my old router as repeater for 2nd floor. and now I have another new minor problem since the new Fibrehome installed; for some reason, even after changing DNS to Google DNS & flush computer's DNS, some websites still blocked for me. especially the torrent ones have changed dns on the router too. weird. QUOTE(kwss @ Jul 19 2024, 02:14 AM) TM is poisoning DNS again. Last time they just outright block port 443, preventing DoH. This time they redirect you to their own server using their own certificate. CODE $ nmap -sCV -Pn -p 443 1.1.1.1 Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2024-07-19 02:09 +08 Nmap scan report for 1.1.1.1 Host is up (0.0093s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 443/tcp open ssl/http EMC Navisphere CIM Object Manager httpd \|_http-title: Site doesn't have a title. \| ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=dns.tm.net.my/organizationName=Telekom Malaysia Berhad/stateOrProvinceName=Kuala Lumpur/countryName=MY \| Subject Alternative Name: DNS:dns.tm.net.my \| Not valid before: 2024-07-09T01:22:02 \|_Not valid after: 2025-04-06T04:36:03 \|_ssl-date: TLS randomness does not represent time Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ . Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 33.86 seconds
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

Anime4000	Jul 29 2024, 02:16 PM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4043
Look at all my stars!! Senior Member 2,399 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: /dev/null	QUOTE(kwss @ Jul 19 2024, 02:14 AM) TM is poisoning DNS again. Last time they just outright block port 443, preventing DoH. This time they redirect you to their own server using their own certificate. CODE $ nmap -sCV -Pn -p 443 1.1.1.1 Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2024-07-19 02:09 +08 Nmap scan report for 1.1.1.1 Host is up (0.0093s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 443/tcp open ssl/http EMC Navisphere CIM Object Manager httpd \|_http-title: Site doesn't have a title. \| ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=dns.tm.net.my/organizationName=Telekom Malaysia Berhad/stateOrProvinceName=Kuala Lumpur/countryName=MY \| Subject Alternative Name: DNS:dns.tm.net.my \| Not valid before: 2024-07-09T01:22:02 \|_Not valid after: 2025-04-06T04:36:03 \|_ssl-date: TLS randomness does not represent time Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ . Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 33.86 seconds I check mine, » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « CODE root@hitoha:~# nmap -sCV -Pn -p 443 1.1.1.1 Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2024-07-29 14:14 +08 Nmap scan report for one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1) Host is up (0.0060s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 443/tcp open ssl/https cloudflare \| fingerprint-strings: \| FourOhFourRequest: \| HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden \| Server: cloudflare \| Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:14:38 GMT \| Content-Type: text/html \| Content-Length: 151 \| Connection: close \| CF-RAY: 8aaaf84c89b913d2-JHB \| <html> \| <head><title>403 Forbidden</title></head> \| <body> \| <center><h1>403 Forbidden</h1></center> \| <hr><center>cloudflare</center> \| </body> \| </html> \| GetRequest: \| HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden \| Server: cloudflare \| Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:14:38 GMT \| Content-Type: text/html \| Content-Length: 151 \| Connection: close \| CF-RAY: 8aaaf84bad3f71e5-JHB \| <html> \| <head><title>403 Forbidden</title></head> \| <body> \| <center><h1>403 Forbidden</h1></center> \| <hr><center>cloudflare</center> \| </body> \| </html> \| HTTPOptions: \| HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden \| Server: cloudflare \| Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:14:38 GMT \| Content-Type: text/html \| Content-Length: 151 \| Connection: close \| CF-RAY: 8aaaf84c1b0f141a-JHB \| <html> \| <head><title>403 Forbidden</title></head> \| <body> \| <center><h1>403 Forbidden</h1></center> \| <hr><center>cloudflare</center> \| </body> \| </html> \| RPCCheck: \| HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request \| Server: cloudflare \| Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:14:44 GMT \| Content-Type: text/html \| Content-Length: 155 \| Connection: close \| CF-RAY: - \| <html> \| <head><title>400 Bad Request</title></head> \| <body> \| <center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center> \| <hr><center>cloudflare</center> \| </body> \| </html> \| RTSPRequest: \| <html> \| <head><title>400 Bad Request</title></head> \| <body> \| <center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center> \| <hr><center>cloudflare</center> \| </body> \| </html> \| tor-versions: \| HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request \| Server: cloudflare \| Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:14:38 GMT \| Content-Type: text/html \| Content-Length: 155 \| Connection: close \| CF-RAY: - \| <html> \| <head><title>400 Bad Request</title></head> \| <body> \| <center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center> \| <hr><center>cloudflare</center> \| </body> \|_ </html> \|_http-generator: 1.1.1.1 \|_http-server-header: cloudflare \|_http-title: 1.1.1.1 \xE2\x80\x94 The free app that makes your Internet faster. \| ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=cloudflare-dns.com/organizationName=Cloudflare, Inc./stateOrProvinceName=California/countryName=US \| Subject Alternative Name: DNS:cloudflare-dns.com, DNS:*.cloudflare-dns.com, DNS:one.one.one.one, IP Address:1.0.0.1, IP Address:1.1.1.1, IP Address:162.159.36.1, IP Address:162.159.46.1, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:1001, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:1111, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:64, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:6400 \| Not valid before: 2023-12-30T00:00:00 \|_Not valid after: 2025-01-21T23:59:59 1 service unrecognized despite returning data. If you know the service/version, please submit the following fingerprint at https://nmap.org/cgi-bin/submit.cgi?new-service : SF-Port443-TCP:V=7.80%T=SSL%I=7%D=7/29%Time=66A7334B%P=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu SF:%r(GetRequest,149,"HTTP/1\.1\x20403\x20Forbidden\r\nServer:\x20cloudfla SF:re\r\nDate:\x20Mon,\x2029\x20Jul\x202024\x2006:14:38\x20GMT\r\nContent- SF:Type:\x20text/html\r\nContent-Length:\x20151\r\nConnection:\x20close\r\ SF:nCF-RAY:\x208aaaf84bad3f71e5-JHB\r\n\r\n<html>\r\n<head><title>403\x20F SF:orbidden</title></head>\r\n<body>\r\n<center><h1>403\x20Forbidden</h1>< SF:/center>\r\n<hr><center>cloudflare</center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html>\r\n") SF:%r(HTTPOptions,149,"HTTP/1\.1\x20403\x20Forbidden\r\nServer:\x20cloudfl SF:are\r\nDate:\x20Mon,\x2029\x20Jul\x202024\x2006:14:38\x20GMT\r\nContent SF:-Type:\x20text/html\r\nContent-Length:\x20151\r\nConnection:\x20close\r SF:\nCF-RAY:\x208aaaf84c1b0f141a-JHB\r\n\r\n<html>\r\n<head><title>403\x20 SF:Forbidden</title></head>\r\n<body>\r\n<center><h1>403\x20Forbidden</h1> SF:</center>\r\n<hr><center>cloudflare</center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html>\r\n" SF:)%r(FourOhFourRequest,149,"HTTP/1\.1\x20403\x20Forbidden\r\nServer:\x20 SF:cloudflare\r\nDate:\x20Mon,\x2029\x20Jul\x202024\x2006:14:38\x20GMT\r\n SF:Content-Type:\x20text/html\r\nContent-Length:\x20151\r\nConnection:\x20 SF:close\r\nCF-RAY:\x208aaaf84c89b913d2-JHB\r\n\r\n<html>\r\n<head><title> SF:403\x20Forbidden</title></head>\r\n<body>\r\n<center><h1>403\x20Forbidd SF:en</h1></center>\r\n<hr><center>cloudflare</center>\r\n</body>\r\n</htm SF:l>\r\n")%r(tor-versions,13C,"HTTP/1\.1\x20400\x20Bad\x20Request\r\nServ SF:er:\x20cloudflare\r\nDate:\x20Mon,\x2029\x20Jul\x202024\x2006:14:38\x20 SF:GMT\r\nContent-Type:\x20text/html\r\nContent-Length:\x20155\r\nConnecti SF:on:\x20close\r\nCF-RAY:\x20-\r\n\r\n<html>\r\n<head><title>400\x20Bad\x SF:20Request</title></head>\r\n<body>\r\n<center><h1>400\x20Bad\x20Request SF:</h1></center>\r\n<hr><center>cloudflare</center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html> SF:\r\n")%r(RTSPRequest,9B,"<html>\r\n<head><title>400\x20Bad\x20Request</ SF:title></head>\r\n<body>\r\n<center><h1>400\x20Bad\x20Request</h1></cent SF:er>\r\n<hr><center>cloudflare</center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html>\r\n")%r(RP SF:CCheck,13C,"HTTP/1\.1\x20400\x20Bad\x20Request\r\nServer:\x20cloudflare SF:\r\nDate:\x20Mon,\x2029\x20Jul\x202024\x2006:14:44\x20GMT\r\nContent-Ty SF:pe:\x20text/html\r\nContent-Length:\x20155\r\nConnection:\x20close\r\nC SF:F-RAY:\x20-\r\n\r\n<html>\r\n<head><title>400\x20Bad\x20Request</title> SF:</head>\r\n<body>\r\n<center><h1>400\x20Bad\x20Request</h1></center>\r\ SF:n<hr><center>cloudflare</center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html>\r\n"); Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ . Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 20.55 seconds My current IPv4 is 124.13.42.16, TM now have selected subnet for DNS/DoH poisoning ?
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

kerolzarmyfanboy	Jul 29 2024, 02:31 PM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4044
On my way Junior Member 575 posts Joined: Feb 2013	I don't seem to see similar 'poisoning' result as well. my IP 100.111.127.254 CODE Starting Nmap 7.95 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2024-07-29 14:25 Malay Peninsula Standard Time Nmap scan report for one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1) Host is up (0.010s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 443/tcp open ssl/http Cloudflare http proxy \| ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=cloudflare-dns.com/organizationName=Cloudflare, Inc./stateOrProvinceName=California/countryName=US \| Subject Alternative Name: DNS:cloudflare-dns.com, DNS:*.cloudflare-dns.com, DNS:one.one.one.one, IP Address:1.0.0.1, IP Address:1.1.1.1, IP Address:162.159.36.1, IP Address:162.159.46.1, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:1001, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:1111, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:64, IP Address:2606:4700:4700:0:0:0:0:6400 \| Not valid before: 2023-12-30T00:00:00 \|_Not valid after: 2025-01-21T23:59:59 \|_http-server-header: cloudflare \|_ssl-date: TLS randomness does not represent time \|_http-generator: 1.1.1.1 \|_http-title: 1.1.1.1 \xE2\x80\x94 The free app that makes your Internet faster. Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ . Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 18.90 seconds
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

kwss	Jul 29 2024, 02:59 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4045
Regular Senior Member 1,207 posts Joined: Aug 2018	QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Jul 29 2024, 11:35 AM) Hmm sorry I am not technical enough to understand - so there's no issue actually? Just tried again and still can't access/ping on IPv4... Can't afford to get a new public IP now since I am outside, but will see if a new IP range works. Tried your command and it's loading forever: CODE curl -v -4 http://tailscale.com * Trying 76.76.21.21:80... Can you post your traceroute to tailscale.com? What if you use https in curl? Does it work? If you have IPv6, try -6 instead of -4 to see if it works. QUOTE(Anime4000 @ Jul 29 2024, 12:43 PM) kwss seem Unifi IPv6 has broken IX or potential MITM attack? My Mikrotik cannot join my friend BGP Bogon IX? https://bgpview.io/ip/2001:8f8:0:10:0:21:58:2a This one is definitely TM at fault. I take a look and Etisalat do not even have IPv6 peering anywhere except Etisalat Dubai EmIX. They do have a looking glass here: http://lg.emix.net.ae/lg/ So I check their BGP: CODE Command: show bgp ipv6 2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2 BGP routing table entry for 2403:cfc0:1100::/48 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 132337 133210 135134 2001:8f8::58 (metric 1) from 2001:8f8::36 (195.229.0.58) Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, internal, best Community: 8966:41 8966:8888 Originator: 195.229.0.58, Cluster list: 195.229.0.36 Last update: Wed Jul 24 04:49:07 2024 AS132337 Axclusive > AS133210 EN Technologies Pte Ltd > AS135134 Soon Keat Neo. Based on this alone it is impossible for Etisalat to take in traffic destinated for AS135134. They are not even adjacent AS. It also clearly stated "Not advertised to any peer" Trying to figure out where they peer, seems to be Equinix SG: CODE traceroute to 2404:160:815c:6f5a:8bb3:d730:f8da:dd5a (2404:160:815c:6f5a:8bb3:d730:f8da:dd5a), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 2001:8f8:0:10:0:22:209:1 (2001:8f8:0:10:0:22:209:1) 3.670 ms 3.797 ms 3.926 ms 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 * 10030.sgw.equinix.com (2001:de8:4::1:30:1) 87.628 ms * 5 * * * They indeed has direct peering to TM, presumably over a route server CODE Command: show bgp ipv6 2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd BGP routing table entry for 2001:e68::/32 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 4788 2001:8f8::21 (metric 1) from 2001:8f8::36 (195.229.0.21) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Community: 4788:6200 4788:6210 Originator: 195.229.0.21, Cluster list: 195.229.0.36 Last update: Sat Jun 1 10:09:34 2024 However, none of this explains why TM will dump traffic to Etisalat when they don't have direct route to your friend. They don't even advertise the prefix. This Etisalat also sucks at IPv6 so I am not surprised they have a routing loop (your traceroute is an example of routing loop). This is further evident by how they configure their DNS AAAA record: CODE dig +short www.etisalat.ae aaaa www.global.etisalat.ae. ::213.42.167.153 ::213.42.214.53 I really wanna laugh. What kind of sorcery is "::213.42.167.153" Since TM don't have a Looking Glass, I cannot tell for sure what is wrong. In this specific case, bogon IP is basically prefix that is not publicly routable because they are used internally in IXP. It is done using BGP filtering. Sorry man, I don't have an exact answer for this question. If you have a working traceroute from last time maybe we can infer something from there. Alternatively, since your friend has control on his end, maybe ask him to run a traceroute to you? I do have a theory: TM is leeching other people's pipe by configuring a static route and dump traffic onto other AS. In a lot of peering policy, this is illegal. Maybe Etisalat do not have this written in their policy and TM is abusing it. QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Jul 29 2024, 12:55 PM) TM technician came this morning & just replaced my old ONU with the Fibrehome HG6145F3, might as well, since still under warranty anyway. guy was puzzled as well as to why so many disconnections when he read the logs haha. but could confirm fibre is fine, so problem could just be between my router and the old ONU, could be just the LAN cable between the two devices even. he just ended up replace the whole thing with HG6145F3 and just disconnect my old router as well. let's see if that might've solved the intermittent disconnect issue, will monitor. gonna use my old router as repeater for 2nd floor. and now I have another new minor problem since the new Fibrehome installed; for some reason, even after changing DNS to Google DNS & flush computer's DNS, some websites still blocked for me. especially the torrent ones have changed dns on the router too. weird. Assuming you are using Windows, did "ipconfig /all" shows you are actually using Google DNS? Sorry I don't run Windows so anyone out there feel free to chime in for the correct command. You can verify with Android phone too by going to your WiFi and tap the gear icon beside your SSID. Tap advanced and scroll down to DNS. If you don't mind, maybe you can post the problematic domain and I look it up for you. Also for the DNS poisoning, it don't happen all the time. I think they are still kind of field testing it. I just caught them doing it. This post has been edited by kwss: Jul 29 2024, 03:17 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

kerolzarmyfanboy	Jul 29 2024, 03:56 PM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4046
On my way Junior Member 575 posts Joined: Feb 2013	QUOTE(kwss @ Jul 29 2024, 02:59 PM) Assuming you are using Windows, did "ipconfig /all" shows you are actually using Google DNS? Sorry I don't run Windows so anyone out there feel free to chime in for the correct command. You can verify with Android phone too by going to your WiFi and tap the gear icon beside your SSID. Tap advanced and scroll down to DNS. If you don't mind, maybe you can post the problematic domain and I look it up for you. Also for the DNS poisoning, it don't happen all the time. I think they are still kind of field testing it. I just caught them doing it. no worries, i'm good now. DNS back to 'normal' after several router reboot, can access all those sites now. Thanks for all the help
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

SUSnonamer	Jul 29 2024, 05:52 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4047
Getting Started Junior Member 224 posts Joined: Apr 2019	connection to europe having problem today? i access european site only for compiling code everyday, today failed twice already, same symptom as when during the recent submarine cable issue
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

zellleonhart	Jul 29 2024, 09:51 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4048
Stars stars stars Senior Member 5,075 posts Joined: Oct 2008	QUOTE(kwss @ Jul 29 2024, 02:59 PM) Can you post your traceroute to tailscale.com? What if you use https in curl? Does it work? If you have IPv6, try -6 instead of -4 to see if it works. I didn't manage to check with traceroute but I tried https in curl, same result. But now I refreshed my ip to 219.xxx.xxx.xxx and I can access tailscale.com now. My previous IP was in the 60.50.xxx.xxx range.
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

ckthang10	Jul 29 2024, 09:57 PM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4049
New Member Junior Member 40 posts Joined: Nov 2011	Currently im using Dlink AX3060 Unifi router in living room. I have linked with Dlink AX3000 as mesh in master bedroom. However, the signal is very weak in bedroom 3, located in between the two devices. I do have 2 units Huawei Echolife WA8021V5 mesh from TIME.com, I did the setup as mesh, both signals appears in the WifiAnalyser app (refer to the attached photo) but it does not connected. The mesh indicator shows as RED. Kindly assist, what went wrong as im new in set up mesh. TQ This post has been edited by ckthang10: Jul 29 2024, 09:58 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

PRSXFENG	Jul 29 2024, 11:03 PM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4050
Look at all my stars!! Senior Member 2,608 posts Joined: Nov 2020	QUOTE(ckthang10 @ Jul 29 2024, 09:57 PM) Currently im using Dlink AX3060 Unifi router in living room. I have linked with Dlink AX3000 as mesh in master bedroom. However, the signal is very weak in bedroom 3, located in between the two devices. I do have 2 units Huawei Echolife WA8021V5 mesh from TIME.com, I did the setup as mesh, both signals appears in the WifiAnalyser app (refer to the attached photo) but it does not connected. The mesh indicator shows as RED. Kindly assist, what went wrong as im new in set up mesh. TQ Incompatible, it's not possible to mesh different brand mesh together (unless they support WiFi Alliance EasyMesh, which they dont) you will need to get more of those dlink routers
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

aniq8676	Jul 29 2024, 11:09 PM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4051
Regular Senior Member 1,524 posts Joined: Dec 2020 From: Perak	QUOTE(ckthang10 @ Jul 29 2024, 09:57 PM) Currently im using Dlink AX3060 Unifi router in living room. I have linked with Dlink AX3000 as mesh in master bedroom. However, the signal is very weak in bedroom 3, located in between the two devices. I do have 2 units Huawei Echolife WA8021V5 mesh from TIME.com, I did the setup as mesh, both signals appears in the WifiAnalyser app (refer to the attached photo) but it does not connected. The mesh indicator shows as RED. Kindly assist, what went wrong as im new in set up mesh. TQ No, router/mesh from TIME FIBRE only supports OmniMesh, while Unifi router supports EASYMESH.
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

tng55	Jul 29 2024, 11:46 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4052
Regular Senior Member 1,440 posts Joined: Sep 2021	QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Jul 29 2024, 01:42 AM) Can anyone check if you can access this website https://tailscale.com? I can't access it on unifi, even with my own DNS, but all good with Digi or under VPN. Pinging it 76.76.21.21 returns 100% packet loss. I happen to want to read a blogpost there but turns out I can't access. This is not the first time I randomly encounter a common/popular site that is not accessible via unifi. mine working my ip range 175.xxx.xxx ping -t 76.76.21.21 Pinging 76.76.21.21 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 76.76.21.21: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=250 Reply from 76.76.21.21: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=250 Reply from 76.76.21.21: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=250 Reply from 76.76.21.21: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=250 Reply from 76.76.21.21: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=250 Reply from 76.76.21.21: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=250 Ping statistics for 76.76.21.21: Packets: Sent = 6, Received = 6, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 9ms, Average = 8ms Control-C
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

kwss	Jul 30 2024, 03:53 AM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4053
Regular Senior Member 1,207 posts Joined: Aug 2018	QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Jul 29 2024, 09:51 PM) I didn't manage to check with traceroute but I tried https in curl, same result. But now I refreshed my ip to 219.xxx.xxx.xxx and I can access tailscale.com now. My previous IP was in the 60.50.xxx.xxx range. Alright then, great that it is solved. Would be nice to have a before and after traceroute to see if it is different. Anime4000, I continue to look into your problem. Knowing they peer at Equinix SG, I use Equinix Looking Glass: https://lg.equinixmetal.com/ As you can see it go straight to AS133210 EN Technologies Pte Ltd > AS135134 Soon Keat Neo CODE BGP routing table entry for 2403:cfc0:1100::/48 Paths: (6 available, best #6, table default) Not advertised to any peer 8966 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Community: 8966:41 8966:8888 Large Community: 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 6, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Large Community: 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 5, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Large Community: 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 3, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 4637 8966 132337 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 150, valid, internal Community: 4637:32023 4637:32304 4637:32501 4637:60952 Large Community: 54825:5007:4000 54825:5007:4009 AddPath ID: RX 4, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Wed Jul 24 02:03:11 2024 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.8) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal Community: 24115:65023 Large Community: 24115:1000:2 24115:1001:1 24115:1002:1 24115:1003:1 24115:1004:133210 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 Originator: 86.109.14.8, Cluster list: 86.109.14.7 AddPath ID: RX 1, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:19:22 2024 133210 135134 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 from 2604:1380:4590:ffff::7 (86.109.14.7) Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 200, valid, internal, best (Router ID) Community: 24115:65023 Large Community: 24115:1000:2 24115:1001:1 24115:1002:2 24115:1003:1 24115:1004:133210 54825:5007:6000 54825:5007:6002 AddPath ID: RX 2, TX-All 0 TX-Best-Per-AS 0 Last update: Sat Jul 27 22:18:38 2024 A traceroute from the Looking Glass confirms it: CODE traceroute to 2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2 (2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2), 15 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 fe80:31::1%bond0 (fe80:31::1%bond0) [] 0.165 ms 2 fc00:da:0:d::2b (fc00:da:0:d::2b) [] 0.157 ms 3 fc00:da:0:d::f (fc00:da:0:d::f) [] 0.543 ms 4 133210-sg1-ix.equinix.com (2001:de8:4::13:3210:1) [] 1.057 ms <--- egress interface AS133210 EN Technologies Pte Ltd 5 2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2 (2403:cfc0:1100:ff00::2) [AS135134] 1.047 ms Now that we have confirmed nothing is wrong with Etisalat (they are never meant to carry the traffic) and Equinix, plus the fact that it works on Celcom, it must be TM. EDIT: I have narrowed down the problem to the peering between AS4788 TM and AS132337 Axclusive. All IPv6 traffic meant for AS132337 Axclusive will end up getting dumped into Etisalat. IPv4 works fine. I am also not sure why TM never send traffic directly to AS133210 EN Technologies when all of them peer with Equinix route server. Even when IPv4 route fine, it go an extra hop to Axclusive instead of directly to EN Technologies. I think your next step is limited. Your friend might have more option since he has an IP Transit relationship with his upstream. Maybe get him to file a complaint? His upstream (AS133210 EN Technologies) will then file another complain to upstream (AS132337 Axclusive) None of these people has a Looking Glass so I think for now there is nothing more to investigate. EDIT 2: I have high confidence 2001:e68::e:fd0b is physically located in Etisalat SmartHub Fujairah. So this is the root cause of all the problem. TM egress the traffic physically in UAE and not Singapore. EDIT 3: I root cause Etisalat IPv6 routing loop problem. It's a configuration error where the next hop address is the same as the loopback address. That guy must be half asleep and mix up the ssh session of different router. CODE BGP neighbor is 2001:8f8::36, remote AS 8966, local AS 8966, internal link BGP version 4, remote router ID 195.229.0.36 BGP state = Established, up for 51w0d13h Last read 00:00:00, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Neighbor capabilities: 4 Byte AS: advertised and received Route refresh: advertised and received(old & new) Address family IPv4 Unicast: advertised Address family IPv6 Unicast: advertised and received Message statistics: Inq depth is 0 Outq depth is 0 Sent Rcvd Opens: 1 1 Notifications: 0 0 Updates: 0 205308908 Keepalives: 511403 7 Route Refresh: 0 1 Capability: 0 0 Total: 511404 205308917 Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds For address family: IPv4 Unicast Community attribute sent to this neighbor(both) Outbound path policy configured Route map for outgoing advertisements is deny-out 0 accepted prefixes For address family: IPv6 Unicast Community attribute sent to this neighbor(both) 209412 accepted prefixes Connections established 1; dropped 0 Last reset never Local host: 2001:8f8:0:10:0:22:209:2, Local port: ??? Foreign host: 2001:8f8::36, Foreign port: ??? Nexthop: 195.229.3.210 Nexthop global: 2001:8f8:0:10:0:22:209:2 Nexthop local: :: BGP connection: non shared network Read thread: on Write thread: off Your problem will be fixed if either: 1. TM don't egress in UAE 2. Etisalat put the correct IPv6 address in their next hop This post has been edited by kwss*: Jul 30 2024, 07:42 AM Anime4000, PRSXFENG, and 1 other liked this post
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

kwss	Jul 30 2024, 03:56 AM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4054
Regular Senior Member 1,207 posts Joined: Aug 2018	QUOTE(PRSXFENG @ Jul 29 2024, 11:03 PM) Incompatible, it's not possible to mesh different brand mesh together (unless they support WiFi Alliance EasyMesh, which they dont) you will need to get more of those dlink routers From my recent reverse engineering of the D-Link firmware, they setup their mesh via a hardcoded SSID along with a hardcoded PSK key. I suspect other vendor do the same thing. Maybe you can "mesh" with your neighbor's D-Link just by knowing the key and SSID but it is untested. Moogle Stiltzkin liked this post
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

ckthang10	Jul 30 2024, 08:08 AM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4055
New Member Junior Member 40 posts Joined: Nov 2011	QUOTE(PRSXFENG @ Jul 29 2024, 11:03 PM) Incompatible, it's not possible to mesh different brand mesh together (unless they support WiFi Alliance EasyMesh, which they dont) you will need to get more of those dlink routers OK Tq sifu.
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

ckthang10	Jul 30 2024, 08:09 AM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4056
New Member Junior Member 40 posts Joined: Nov 2011	QUOTE(aniq8676 @ Jul 29 2024, 11:09 PM) No, router/mesh from TIME FIBRE only supports OmniMesh, while Unifi router supports EASYMESH. Tq Sifu for your clarification.
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

ckthang10	Jul 30 2024, 08:17 AM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4057
New Member Junior Member 40 posts Joined: Nov 2011	QUOTE(PRSXFENG @ Jul 29 2024, 11:03 PM) Incompatible, it's not possible to mesh different brand mesh together (unless they support WiFi Alliance EasyMesh, which they dont) you will need to get more of those dlink routers Would DLink M15 Eagle Pro AX1500 compatible as mesh with Unifi router?
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

trix	Jul 30 2024, 10:09 AM Show posts by this member only \| Post #4058
Enthusiast Senior Member 848 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: everywhere, yet nowhere.	QUOTE(Anime4000 @ Jul 29 2024, 02:16 PM) I check mine, My current IPv4 is 124.13.42.16, TM now have selected subnet for DNS/DoH poisoning ? QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Jul 29 2024, 02:31 PM) I don't seem to see similar 'poisoning' result as well. my IP 100.111.127.254 from my log, the test start and stop on the day itself first occurrence: Jul 19 01:39:48 unbound 75835 [75835:0] error: ssl handshake failed crypto error:0A000086:SSL routines::certificate verify failed last occurrence: Jul 19 10:53:25 unbound 47093 [47093:1] error: ssl handshake failed crypto error:0A000086:SSL routines::certificate verify failed
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

soonwai	Jul 30 2024, 10:32 AM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4059
 All Stars 11,456 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: KL	QUOTE(soonwai @ Jul 11 2024, 11:09 AM) chong83 Decided to prod TM a bit. Livechat with them on 7/7. Today got the call for the 1Gbps upgrade. CS just read out the terms of the upgrade - 800-1000/500, new modem/router (1-yr warranty), no charge for technician visit, no re-contract, price, UnifiTV & call package remains the same. Now wait for technician to set appointment. The only thing I find strange is that, even though I was given a report number after the live chat, there's no sign of the ticket in either My Activities or My Orders. Want to get FSU also so susah. Anyway today got update. Randomly checked My Orders and saw something appeared dated 3 days ago. 20240108: Live chat back in Jan 20240707: Live chat for FSU 20240711: TM call to accept TnC. 20240719: 2 missed calls from TM 20240727: Modify Package order created. Current status "Order is in progress" OK, back to waiting. Still July. Update: 20240731: Installer called in the morning and installation done afternoon. Package name updated to "Unifi Home 1Gbps - Pro Upgrade" This post has been edited by soonwai: Oct 21 2024, 02:34 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

soonwai	Jul 30 2024, 10:42 AM Show posts by this member only \| IPv6 \| Post #4060
 All Stars 11,456 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: KL	QUOTE(jiaen0509 @ Jul 24 2024, 03:01 PM) TM just called me to offer a 3-month fee waiver in exchange for a 24-month contract. I need your opinion. If you decide to keep the services and not switch ISPs, would you take the offer considering it’s only for 3 months? Not sure how para lowyat guru will advise. Back in 2019, TM offered this YEP 2019. Also same, 3 mths free with 24-mth contract renewal. https://www.lowyat.net/2019/195336/unifi-pa...thing-end-year/ Then we also had a debate about 3 mths free vs 24 mth contract renewal but that time no SWU. In the end, I went for the free 3-mths. This post has been edited by soonwai: Jul 30 2024, 10:45 AM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

« Next Oldest · Networks and Broadband · Next Newest »

495 Pages « < 201 202 203 204 205 > » Top

Topic ClosedOptions

Change to:

0.0454sec

0.25

6 queries

GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 03:06 AM

All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)

Removal Request

Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.