Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V39, READ 1ST PAGE FOR RELEVANT WIFI INFO
|
|
 Mar 1 2021, 08:31 AM
|
 
Senior Member
6,666 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Malaysia   
|
So i received call from Unifi and they only offer me RM159 (M4 1 pair) 300mbps package.
Cant get the RM139 for 300mbps. But still i just get RM159 and probably pass that router to my parents' home |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 08:42 AM
|
Senior Member
6,265 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: UEP Subang Jaya 
|
QUOTE(cskean @ Feb 28 2021, 11:04 PM) Yup, it is fax capable. All the while the printer is connected with a telephone line. It was meant for my wife usage, but since she quit her job, I just keep it like that all the while. Is your printer the sort which connect to network via LAN. Hope it's not running it's own DHCP server pointing to itself....I remember with the same setup(where the telephone line is connected to the printer), I didn't encounter such issue before all the while. Only few days ago when I was unable to wirelessly print my son's homework from my laptop, I thought the printer needed a restart(I hardly restart it unless loss connection), then only I found out such situation. Maybe will try again tomorrow and feedback here the outcome...  |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 08:50 AM
|
|
Senior Member
6,666 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Malaysia
|
QUOTE(TongCN @ Mar 1 2021, 08:31 AM) So i received call from Unifi and they only offer me RM159 (M4 1 pair) 300mbps package. Accepted on Friday evening roughly 6pm +Cant get the RM139 for 300mbps. But still i just get RM159 and probably pass that router to my parents' home Weekend =/= working day This morning 8:30am checked and become unifi 300Mbps - Loyalty Super Value (Broadband + MESH WiFi M4) That's fast EDIT: Test using 3 platform 1) Speed test - 70mbps down +- 2) Fast.com - 67~70mbps down 3) TP-Link Deco app - 306mbps What? This post has been edited by TongCN: Mar 1 2021, 08:54 AM |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 09:00 AM
|
|
Senior Member
6,265 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: UEP Subang Jaya
|
QUOTE(TongCN @ Mar 1 2021, 08:50 AM) EDIT: Test using 3 platform Deco app is correct because it is directly from router to modem to server.1) Speed test - 70mbps down +- 2) Fast.com - 67~70mbps down 3) TP-Link Deco app - 306mbps What? Your speedtest/fast.com is from your machine (PC/laptop/phone) which is connected via wifi. Those speeds means you are connecting via 2.4GHz probably. Connect by LAN/5G and you will see close to 300. |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 09:25 AM
|
|
Senior Member
6,666 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Malaysia
|
QUOTE(LostAndFound @ Mar 1 2021, 09:00 AM) Deco app is correct because it is directly from router to modem to server. Oh ya, now u mentioned. Your speedtest/fast.com is from your machine (PC/laptop/phone) which is connected via wifi. Those speeds means you are connecting via 2.4GHz probably. Connect by LAN/5G and you will see close to 300. My office laptop connected to the Guest Wifi which is 2.4ghz only XD Thanks for the clarification. EDIT: I tested my xbox which using LAN cable using the the console own speed test and get this result: 
I also use my android phone connected my main WiFi which is 5Ghz also getting 100mbps max Using iphone 11 also same, weird. But Deco App still shows 300+ mbps Router using was TP-Link X20 right now This post has been edited by TongCN: Mar 1 2021, 09:36 AM |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 09:55 AM
|
Junior Member
336 posts Joined: May 2013
|
QUOTE(TongCN @ Mar 1 2021, 09:25 AM) Oh ya, now u mentioned. Try restart your modem and router.My office laptop connected to the Guest Wifi which is 2.4ghz only XD Thanks for the clarification. EDIT: I tested my xbox which using LAN cable using the the console own speed test and get this result:
I also use my android phone connected my main WiFi which is 5Ghz also getting 100mbps max Using iphone 11 also same, weird. But Deco App still shows 300+ mbps Router using was TP-Link X20 right now |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 11:15 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1207
|
Junior Member
678 posts Joined: Mar 2016
|
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Feb 28 2021, 11:23 PM) Now connection to JP also getting worst Seems like only certain route got problem 30% packet loss for 100 round trip at peak hoursSMW-5 cable to EU will be fixed by 10th March info from TM side. hope everything back to normal. Oracle Osaka through TataCom from unifi to Oracle Osaka CODE Pinging login.ap-osaka-1.oraclecloud.com [140.204.30.132] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=54 Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54 Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=54 Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 140.204.30.132: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 98ms, Average = 94ms Will test at night see how again |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 11:53 AM
|
Senior Member
2,551 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cheras / Ampang
|
QUOTE(LostAndFound @ Mar 1 2021, 08:42 AM) Is your printer the sort which connect to network via LAN. Hope it's not running it's own DHCP server pointing to itself.... I'm connecting my printer via wifi only as my printer is sitting on the 1st floor while my router is located at the living hall on the ground floor...I'm not up to the level where I can setup such advance setting to the printer yet...  |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 01:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,232 posts Joined: Dec 2009
|
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Feb 28 2021, 11:23 PM) Now connection to JP also getting worst How do you get those TM sources? I ask all those TM "engineers" all the time about this problem with TM connection and ALL of them are so coy. 30% packet loss for 100 round trip at peak hoursSMW-5 cable to EU will be fixed by 10th March info from TM side. hope everything back to normal. They either really don't know or they don't want to say anything. Or maybe instructed not to say anything. But I am glad to see I am not the only one experiencing this TM issue, and it's been going on for some time now. So only March 10, the issue will be fixed for EU connection? What about the others? |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 02:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
6,666 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Malaysia
|
QUOTE(y500 @ Mar 1 2021, 09:55 AM) Try restart your modem and router. Just now did nothing and the speed right now increase already , lolz.. tonight test again seeAt least now my xbox test speed get 280mbps |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 03:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1211
|
|
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Apr 2018
|
Comparison of TM DNS, Google DNS and Cloudflare DNS from East Malaysia for Akamai CDN (used by streaming sites such as VIU) as at today.
TM DNS » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Google DNS » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Cloudflare DNS » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Not only is Cloudflare no longer the fastest responding DNS, but it also returns non-optimal IPs (which at the moment is unusable due to International routing issues) for Akamai CDN as can be seen in the ping test below: IP returned by TM and Google DNS CODE Pinging 203.106.94.179 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=61 Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=61 Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=61 Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=61 Ping statistics for 203.106.94.179: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 20ms IP returned by Cloudflare DNS CODE Pinging 23.50.232.183 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=56 Request timed out. Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=336ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 23.50.232.183: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 332ms, Maximum = 336ms, Average = 333ms Therefore I have switched back to using Google DNS and the streaming services are working smoothly with max resolution now. |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 03:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1212
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(Sam Leong @ Mar 1 2021, 11:15 AM) Seems like only certain route got problem mine everyday same no need test unless you connected specific ip range.Oracle Osaka through TataCom from unifi to Oracle Osaka CODE Pinging login.ap-osaka-1.oraclecloud.com [140.204.30.132] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=54 Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54 Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=54 Reply from 140.204.30.132: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 140.204.30.132: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 98ms, Average = 94ms Will test at night see how again |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 03:39 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1213
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(Hobbez @ Mar 1 2021, 01:08 PM) How do you get those TM sources? I ask all those TM "engineers" all the time about this problem with TM connection and ALL of them are so coy. exact time should be 14th march. but tm say 10th march so just wait and see.They either really don't know or they don't want to say anything. Or maybe instructed not to say anything. But I am glad to see I am not the only one experiencing this TM issue, and it's been going on for some time now. So only March 10, the issue will be fixed for EU connection? What about the others? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 03:59 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1214
|
|
Junior Member
678 posts Joined: Mar 2016
|
QUOTE(AV_2018 @ Mar 1 2021, 03:34 PM) Comparison of TM DNS, Google DNS and Cloudflare DNS from East Malaysia for Akamai CDN (used by streaming sites such as VIU) as at today. For me also unifi but no problem with 23.50.232.183IP returned by Cloudflare DNS CODE Pinging 23.50.232.183 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=56 Request timed out. Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=336ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 23.50.232.183: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 332ms, Maximum = 336ms, Average = 333ms Therefore I have switched back to using Google DNS and the streaming services are working smoothly with max resolution now. CODE Pinging 23.50.232.183 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 23.50.232.183: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 59ms, Average = 58ms and traceroute shows it go to HK first only back to SG with Telia  This is what Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 return me for gcpvuclip-a.akamaihd.net  |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 04:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,882 posts Joined: Sep 2017
|
QUOTE(Sam Leong @ Mar 1 2021, 03:59 PM) For me also unifi but no problem with 23.50.232.183 Maybe u can try to use modify "hosts" with this following ips for getting better speed. (For gcpvuclip-a.akamaihd.net)CODE Pinging 23.50.232.183 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 23.50.232.183: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 59ms, Average = 58ms and traceroute shows it go to HK first only back to SG with Telia This is what Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 return me for gcpvuclip-a.akamaihd.net  |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 04:16 PM
|
Senior Member
1,129 posts Joined: Nov 2015
|
QUOTE(AV_2018 @ Mar 1 2021, 04:34 PM) Comparison of TM DNS, Google DNS and Cloudflare DNS from East Malaysia for Akamai CDN (used by streaming sites such as VIU) as at today. Ty for the test.TM DNS » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Google DNS » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Cloudflare DNS » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Not only is Cloudflare no longer the fastest responding DNS, but it also returns non-optimal IPs (which at the moment is unusable due to International routing issues) for Akamai CDN as can be seen in the ping test below: IP returned by TM and Google DNS CODE Pinging 203.106.94.179 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=61 Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=61 Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=61 Reply from 203.106.94.179: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=61 Ping statistics for 203.106.94.179: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 20ms IP returned by Cloudflare DNS CODE Pinging 23.50.232.183 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=56 Request timed out. Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=56 Reply from 23.50.232.183: bytes=32 time=336ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 23.50.232.183: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 332ms, Maximum = 336ms, Average = 333ms Therefore I have switched back to using Google DNS and the streaming services are working smoothly with max resolution now. Tested on wow, eso, ff14 in game ping: Tm, cloud, google Wow 400 460 230 Eso 366 to 999999999 drop all lost packet from akamai to server. 299 to 999999999 drop 266 to 999999999 drop Ff14 210 110 111 Seems like akamai is the problem. |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 04:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,882 posts Joined: Sep 2017
|
QUOTE(RallyNight @ Mar 1 2021, 04:16 PM) Ty for the test. TM to ESO US server and AWS EAST seems like using the same pipe.Tested on wow, eso, ff14 in game ping: Tm, cloud, google Wow 400 460 230 Eso 366 to 999999999 drop all lost packet from akamai to server. 299 to 999999999 drop 266 to 999999999 drop Ff14 210 110 111 Seems like akamai is the problem. ESO US  AWS EAST   Edit: I think i accidently put the wrong ip for the wrong region name for ESO...Just reset the monitor for ESO. This post has been edited by go626201: Mar 1 2021, 04:43 PM |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 04:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,129 posts Joined: Nov 2015
|
QUOTE(go626201 @ Mar 1 2021, 05:23 PM) TM to ESO US server and AWS EAST seems like using the same pipe. This explain. Tyvm.ESO EU AWS EAST Now eso barely can even pass thru login screen. Cause friend ask me test for them. |
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 04:35 PM
|
|
Junior Member
864 posts Joined: May 2005
|
My Adguard Home DNS server uses both Cloudflare DOT & Google DOH server, parallel requests so I always get fastest response from either one. I'm still getting faster response from Cloudflare, is it only their DNS servers problematic but their DOT servers still OK?
|
|
|
Mar 1 2021, 04:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,882 posts Joined: Sep 2017
|
QUOTE(RallyNight @ Mar 1 2021, 04:33 PM) This explain. Tyvm. I think i accidentally put the wrong name for the ESO monitor.Now eso barely can even pass thru login screen. Cause friend ask me test for them. The previous replies picture should be NA server monitor result. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0191sec
 0.68
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 05:52 PM |
Quote