Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
131 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits

views
     
toch3
post Nov 19 2006, 05:35 PM

**s3r3nd1p1ty**
*****
Senior Member
912 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Cyber-LaLa


f8 bios no improvement for OCing?or just for D9?
irenic
post Nov 19 2006, 06:32 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(Sanko @ Nov 19 2006, 01:53 PM)
hehe... if no one wants it then i'll keep it. btw, if i'm not mistaken now only evga, striker etreme and bfg available for 680i. while the abit IN9 32X MAX will only hit retailers on january. and seems like czone now accepting pre order for the striker, RM1799!!!!! lol
*
it's normal for them to hijack the price, summore they dun have competitor yet and it is pre order..

i believe the 680i SLI board is good, managed to hit higher fsb than 965 (and 975 of course) but i'm not sure if it is worth upgrading unless u wanna do SLI or u wanna oc ur fsb kaw kaw thumbup.gif

i dunno if i'll be buying any 680i board or not.. coz rite now asus p5w dh is the best c2d board i ever used.. biggrin.gif



This post has been edited by irenic: Nov 19 2006, 06:43 PM
Sanko
post Nov 19 2006, 06:42 PM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


QUOTE(irenic @ Nov 19 2006, 06:32 PM)
it's normal for them to hijack the price, summore they dun have competitor yet and it is pre order..

i believe the 680i SLI board is damn good, manage to hit higher fsb than 965 (and 975 of course)  but i'm not sure if it is worth upgrading unless u wanna do SLI or u wanna oc ur fsb kaw kaw  thumbup.gif

i dunno if i'll be buying any 680i board or not.. coz rite now asus p5w dh is the best c2d board i ever used.. biggrin.gif
*
that is one of the reason i'm trying to let it go to a better owner. cause i'm not going for any sli rig. and to wait for 650 ultra is just too long. this C2D upgrade has been kinda long for me. btw, i'm only using 73gt and only dota. lol. i guess it's more than enuff. but if i'm not mistaken P5B-D clocks better than P5W rite?
irenic
post Nov 19 2006, 06:46 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(Sanko @ Nov 19 2006, 06:42 PM)
that is one of the reason i'm trying to let it go to a better owner. cause i'm not going for any sli rig. and to wait for 650 ultra is just too long. this C2D upgrade has been kinda long for me. btw, i'm only using 73gt and only dota. lol. i guess it's more than enuff. but if i'm not mistaken P5B-D clocks better than P5W rite?
*
in terms of FSB overclocking, yes p5b d is better but clock to clock p5w dh is just much faster.. and since 975x chipset is older and more matured, it is more stable and solid than the newer 965 chipset.


coolice
post Nov 19 2006, 07:29 PM

Team OCD!
******
Senior Member
1,857 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: ocdrift.com


QUOTE(irenic @ Nov 19 2006, 06:46 PM)
in terms of FSB overclocking, yes p5b d is better but clock to clock p5w dh is just much faster.. and since 975x chipset is older and more matured, it is more stable and solid than the newer 965 chipset.
*
faster in which way unsure.gif
i wish i got money to buy P5W64 WS Pro tongue.gif
siauann
post Nov 19 2006, 09:23 PM

Music-Movies-Coffee
*******
Senior Member
3,375 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: MeeRee


QUOTE(mikelanding @ Nov 19 2006, 12:12 PM)
Are U sure U google enough? Here is 1 review from VR-Zone about eVGA n680i http://sg.vr-zone.com/?i=4215. Sanko who got the mobo plan to sell it by the way...want to buy and make a review here?  wink.gif  wink.gif

U might want to check out the n680i chipset review. They compare a lot with intel P975 and P965. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/chipsets/...e-680i-sli.html
*
well...mayb my english not that good blush.gif wat i mean is the abit nf680i sli based mobo..not nf680i sli chipset mobo cz i did read bout the evga mobo wink.gif


QUOTE(Sanko @ Nov 19 2006, 01:53 PM)
hehe... if no one wants it then i'll keep it. btw, if i'm not mistaken now only evga, striker etreme and bfg available for 680i. while the abit IN9 32X MAX will only hit retailers on january. and seems like czone now accepting pre order for the striker, RM1799!!!!! lol
*
oh...abit only january.. biggrin.gif
btw sanko~
hws the 680 perform? dint share any results here? brows.gif
urs is the evga? rolleyes.gif


QUOTE(irenic @ Nov 19 2006, 06:46 PM)
in terms of FSB overclocking, yes p5b d is better but clock to clock p5w dh is just much faster.. and since 975x chipset is older and more matured, it is more stable and solid than the newer 965 chipset.
*
well...i dun understand fsb oc and clock...
does u means that the allendale wrks better wif 965 chipset cz the clocks is lower..and in order to achieve high oc need to pump high fsb to get higher clock speed? unsure.gif while the 975 is better with those proc with higher speed? then oc high speed doesnt requires a high fsb? unsure.gif
im not sure though...need some professional explanation sweat.gif
Sanko
post Nov 19 2006, 10:20 PM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


siauann: hrmm.. i still haven't receive my mobo. still with my friend in SG. lol
irenic
post Nov 20 2006, 02:43 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(siauann @ Nov 19 2006, 09:23 PM)
well...i dun understand fsb oc and clock...
does u means that the allendale wrks better wif 965 chipset cz the clocks is lower..and in order to achieve high oc need to pump high fsb to get higher clock speed?  unsure.gif  while the 975 is better with those proc with higher speed? then oc high speed doesnt requires a high fsb?  unsure.gif
im not sure though...need some professional explanation  sweat.gif
*
fsb oc means u overclock ur fsb. while we alwiz increase fsb to overclock, but for some people who has extreme or unlock processor (like amd FX series, intel c2d x6800), they can just change the multiplier so that their fsb remains at stock.

for eg,

x6800 u can either choose 266x14 or 465x8 to reach 3.7ghz..

but for e6300, u have no choice but need to oc the fsb up till 531x7 to reach 3.7ghz.

so in this case, i believe 680i board is good to those who believe they need a board that can allow them to reach higher fsb in order to allow them to reach higher clockspeed.

and why in earlier day of c2d, people kept saying 975x is good for conroe and 965 is good for allendale?

act bcoz 975 board cant go as high fsb as 965 does.. so with conroe, which has bigger multiplier than allendale, u can still reach high clockspeed.. but with 965, it is actually suit well with both conroe n allendale..

and yes, higher fsb means u can oc ur ram more... plus nforce board allows ram to run at 1T unlike Intel board who keeps the ram at 2T.

but from xbitlabs review, it seems 975 chipset is a better choice than 680i board, well for now..

This post has been edited by irenic: Nov 20 2006, 02:44 AM
DaRkSyThE
post Nov 20 2006, 05:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
4,809 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



sorry, im not sure whether anyone has said this, but 965 is capable of hitting a higher fsb?
and the 975 is better for thighter timings i think, but from what ive read, the 975 beats the 965 is almost all aspects

(sorry if there are any typos, this internet kiosk in australia just aint good for typing smile.gif)
BeastX
post Nov 21 2006, 12:13 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


Time to start a quad core overclocking thread, just got the extreme qx6700 (1.263 billion transistors with nvidia g80)
overclocking tonight
user posted image

This post has been edited by BeastX: Nov 21 2006, 04:30 PM
BeastX
post Nov 21 2006, 05:00 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(irenic @ Nov 21 2006, 04:31 PM)
the most important thing is, where u bought it from? might be interested if the performance really effect real life applications and gamings.. i wont spend more than 3k for processor doesnt provide any significant advantage in real life..
over 3k for 2 processors actually (intel style glue),.. slightly cheaper than 2 e6700.. bought retail in Japan.. I mostly run linux, virtual machines, xen with windows/solaris OS. Data processing, a little video coding and some gaming
irenic
post Nov 21 2006, 07:58 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(BeastX @ Nov 21 2006, 05:00 PM)
over 3k for 2 processors actually (intel style glue),.. slightly cheaper than 2 e6700.. bought retail in Japan.. I mostly run linux, virtual machines, xen with windows/solaris OS. Data processing,  a little video coding and some gaming
*
yeah it is cheaper than 2 processors.. and it's glue style does limited the performance.. same case as pentium D..

but for ur work, i believe this proc suits u very well thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by irenic: Nov 21 2006, 07:58 PM
yehlai
post Nov 21 2006, 08:46 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N


already oc?? mind to share some screenie?? :droll:
yehlai
post Nov 21 2006, 08:49 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N


Sorry guys OFF TOPIC.
OC means warranty void for proc and mobo??
Evogenix
post Nov 22 2006, 01:23 AM

I Missed LYN Grey Skin T_T
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(yehlai @ Nov 21 2006, 08:49 PM)
Sorry guys OFF TOPIC.
OC means warranty void for proc and mobo??
*
if follow by the rules, yes! warranty will be voided.
but if no burn mark on the board, you might still able to claim for warranty laugh.gif

Evogenix
Evogenix
post Nov 22 2006, 01:24 AM

I Missed LYN Grey Skin T_T
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



i believed there will be "low-end" quad-core series by early of next year right? brows.gif

Evogenix
rlhc17
post Nov 22 2006, 03:21 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
835 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: LYP@Bintang Walk



QUOTE(Evogenix @ Nov 22 2006, 01:24 AM)
i believed there will be "low-end" quad-core series by early of next year right? brows.gif

Evogenix
*
yup,me hoping to get the "low-end" quad-core too biggrin.gif
t3chn0m4nc3r
post Nov 22 2006, 12:34 PM

Teh Necron Lord
*******
Senior Member
4,139 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Internet


QUOTE(-pWs- @ Nov 22 2006, 11:34 AM)
Same wif u tongue.gif Haha  rclxm9.gif
*
i would see wat AMD have under their sleeves 1st... whistling.gif
BeastX
post Nov 22 2006, 12:40 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


overclocked to 3.5ghz.. still testing.. power supply problem delay things..

there are also xeons for socket 775 the x3220 and x3210.. that are essentially the same as q6600 and q6400 with the exception of better binnings at lower voltage.

xeon x3230 = core 2 xtreme qx6700
xeon x3240 = 3.0GHz at 1333MHz FSB
irenic
post Nov 22 2006, 12:55 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


beastX, why dont u just buy the xeon? issit using a diff socket?

yeah low end quad core seems interesting.. biggrin.gif

131 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0280sec    0.75    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 07:35 AM