f8 bios no improvement for OCing?or just for D9?
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 05:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
912 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Cyber-LaLa |
f8 bios no improvement for OCing?or just for D9?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 06:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,338 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya |
QUOTE(Sanko @ Nov 19 2006, 01:53 PM) hehe... if no one wants it then i'll keep it. btw, if i'm not mistaken now only evga, striker etreme and bfg available for 680i. while the abit IN9 32X MAX will only hit retailers on january. and seems like czone now accepting pre order for the striker, RM1799!!!!! lol it's normal for them to hijack the price, summore they dun have competitor yet and it is pre order..i believe the 680i SLI board is good, managed to hit higher fsb than 965 (and 975 of course) but i'm not sure if it is worth upgrading unless u wanna do SLI or u wanna oc ur fsb kaw kaw i dunno if i'll be buying any 680i board or not.. coz rite now asus p5w dh is the best c2d board i ever used.. This post has been edited by irenic: Nov 19 2006, 06:43 PM |
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 06:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,436 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(irenic @ Nov 19 2006, 06:32 PM) it's normal for them to hijack the price, summore they dun have competitor yet and it is pre order.. that is one of the reason i'm trying to let it go to a better owner. cause i'm not going for any sli rig. and to wait for 650 ultra is just too long. this C2D upgrade has been kinda long for me. btw, i'm only using 73gt and only dota. lol. i guess it's more than enuff. but if i'm not mistaken P5B-D clocks better than P5W rite?i believe the 680i SLI board is damn good, manage to hit higher fsb than 965 (and 975 of course) but i'm not sure if it is worth upgrading unless u wanna do SLI or u wanna oc ur fsb kaw kaw i dunno if i'll be buying any 680i board or not.. coz rite now asus p5w dh is the best c2d board i ever used.. |
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 06:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,338 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya |
QUOTE(Sanko @ Nov 19 2006, 06:42 PM) that is one of the reason i'm trying to let it go to a better owner. cause i'm not going for any sli rig. and to wait for 650 ultra is just too long. this C2D upgrade has been kinda long for me. btw, i'm only using 73gt and only dota. lol. i guess it's more than enuff. but if i'm not mistaken P5B-D clocks better than P5W rite? in terms of FSB overclocking, yes p5b d is better but clock to clock p5w dh is just much faster.. and since 975x chipset is older and more matured, it is more stable and solid than the newer 965 chipset. |
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 07:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,857 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: ocdrift.com |
|
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 09:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,375 posts Joined: May 2005 From: MeeRee |
QUOTE(mikelanding @ Nov 19 2006, 12:12 PM) Are U sure U google enough? Here is 1 review from VR-Zone about eVGA n680i http://sg.vr-zone.com/?i=4215. Sanko who got the mobo plan to sell it by the way...want to buy and make a review here? well...mayb my english not that good U might want to check out the n680i chipset review. They compare a lot with intel P975 and P965. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/chipsets/...e-680i-sli.html QUOTE(Sanko @ Nov 19 2006, 01:53 PM) hehe... if no one wants it then i'll keep it. btw, if i'm not mistaken now only evga, striker etreme and bfg available for 680i. while the abit IN9 32X MAX will only hit retailers on january. and seems like czone now accepting pre order for the striker, RM1799!!!!! lol oh...abit only january.. btw sanko~ hws the 680 perform? dint share any results here? urs is the evga? QUOTE(irenic @ Nov 19 2006, 06:46 PM) in terms of FSB overclocking, yes p5b d is better but clock to clock p5w dh is just much faster.. and since 975x chipset is older and more matured, it is more stable and solid than the newer 965 chipset. well...i dun understand fsb oc and clock...does u means that the allendale wrks better wif 965 chipset cz the clocks is lower..and in order to achieve high oc need to pump high fsb to get higher clock speed? im not sure though...need some professional explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 10:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,436 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
siauann: hrmm.. i still haven't receive my mobo. still with my friend in SG. lol
|
|
|
Nov 20 2006, 02:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,338 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya |
QUOTE(siauann @ Nov 19 2006, 09:23 PM) well...i dun understand fsb oc and clock... fsb oc means u overclock ur fsb. while we alwiz increase fsb to overclock, but for some people who has extreme or unlock processor (like amd FX series, intel c2d x6800), they can just change the multiplier so that their fsb remains at stock.does u means that the allendale wrks better wif 965 chipset cz the clocks is lower..and in order to achieve high oc need to pump high fsb to get higher clock speed? im not sure though...need some professional explanation for eg, x6800 u can either choose 266x14 or 465x8 to reach 3.7ghz.. but for e6300, u have no choice but need to oc the fsb up till 531x7 to reach 3.7ghz. so in this case, i believe 680i board is good to those who believe they need a board that can allow them to reach higher fsb in order to allow them to reach higher clockspeed. and why in earlier day of c2d, people kept saying 975x is good for conroe and 965 is good for allendale? act bcoz 975 board cant go as high fsb as 965 does.. so with conroe, which has bigger multiplier than allendale, u can still reach high clockspeed.. but with 965, it is actually suit well with both conroe n allendale.. and yes, higher fsb means u can oc ur ram more... plus nforce board allows ram to run at 1T unlike Intel board who keeps the ram at 2T. but from xbitlabs review, it seems 975 chipset is a better choice than 680i board, well for now.. This post has been edited by irenic: Nov 20 2006, 02:44 AM |
|
|
Nov 20 2006, 05:23 PM
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
sorry, im not sure whether anyone has said this, but 965 is capable of hitting a higher fsb?
and the 975 is better for thighter timings i think, but from what ive read, the 975 beats the 965 is almost all aspects (sorry if there are any typos, this internet kiosk in australia just aint good for typing |
|
|
Nov 21 2006, 12:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon |
Time to start a quad core overclocking thread, just got the extreme qx6700 (1.263 billion transistors with nvidia g80)
overclocking tonight ![]() This post has been edited by BeastX: Nov 21 2006, 04:30 PM |
|
|
Nov 21 2006, 05:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon |
QUOTE(irenic @ Nov 21 2006, 04:31 PM) the most important thing is, where u bought it from? might be interested if the performance really effect real life applications and gamings.. i wont spend more than 3k for processor doesnt provide any significant advantage in real life.. over 3k for 2 processors actually (intel style glue),.. slightly cheaper than 2 e6700.. bought retail in Japan.. I mostly run linux, virtual machines, xen with windows/solaris OS. Data processing, a little video coding and some gaming |
|
|
Nov 21 2006, 07:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,338 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya |
QUOTE(BeastX @ Nov 21 2006, 05:00 PM) over 3k for 2 processors actually (intel style glue),.. slightly cheaper than 2 e6700.. bought retail in Japan.. I mostly run linux, virtual machines, xen with windows/solaris OS. Data processing, a little video coding and some gaming yeah it is cheaper than 2 processors.. and it's glue style does limited the performance.. same case as pentium D.. but for ur work, i believe this proc suits u very well This post has been edited by irenic: Nov 21 2006, 07:58 PM |
|
|
Nov 21 2006, 08:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,539 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N |
already oc?? mind to share some screenie?? :droll:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 21 2006, 08:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,539 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N |
Sorry guys OFF TOPIC.
OC means warranty void for proc and mobo?? |
|
|
Nov 22 2006, 01:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Nov 22 2006, 01:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
i believed there will be "low-end" quad-core series by early of next year right?
Evogenix |
|
|
Nov 22 2006, 03:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
835 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: LYP@Bintang Walk |
|
|
|
Nov 22 2006, 12:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
|
|
|
Nov 22 2006, 12:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon |
overclocked to 3.5ghz.. still testing.. power supply problem delay things..
there are also xeons for socket 775 the x3220 and x3210.. that are essentially the same as q6600 and q6400 with the exception of better binnings at lower voltage. xeon x3230 = core 2 xtreme qx6700 xeon x3240 = 3.0GHz at 1333MHz FSB |
|
|
Nov 22 2006, 12:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,338 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya |
beastX, why dont u just buy the xeon? issit using a diff socket?
yeah low end quad core seems interesting.. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0280sec
0.75
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 07:35 AM |