Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
128 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.24, WE love spiders

views
     
gerald7
post Apr 29 2014, 07:23 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,452 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


im jst back to say.. FUIYOOO ada leng lui pics! more pleasE!
f5calvin
post Apr 30 2014, 12:14 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


user posted imageNew babies! by Calvin Kohlz facebook.com/calvinkohphotography, on Flickr

shot wif nikon. lol.
ongdennis
post Apr 30 2014, 12:31 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
762 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Melaka


after very long time...only able to continue the "dot-tune" for all my prime lens.

the adjustment seem very huge

nikon 50mm f1.8g --> -6
nikon 85mm f1.8g --> -10
tamron sp90 f2.8 --> +18

testing the result using newspaper and it seem working fine.
f5calvin
post Apr 30 2014, 01:01 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


if there's another lens i'd like to add, it's either the 85mm 1.8g or the 70-200 f2.8 tamron macro.
Which is a better choice?
celciuz
post Apr 30 2014, 07:56 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Apr 30 2014, 01:01 AM)
if there's another lens i'd like to add, it's either the 85mm 1.8g or the 70-200 f2.8 tamron macro.
Which is a better choice?
*
Both different types of lens, do you need the 200mm reach? If yes then its the 70200. If not you just want the big aperture and 85mm range is ok then go for the prime.
[PF] T.J.
post Apr 30 2014, 04:45 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
Macro shots for today thumbup.gif

user posted imageMalay Dartlet (Oriens cf. paragola) by PF T.J., on Flickr

user posted imageA female Blue Dasher (Brachydiplax chalybea ♀) by PF T.J., on Flickr

user posted imageHoney bee (Apis mellifera) by PF T.J., on Flickr
MichaelJohn
post Apr 30 2014, 05:52 PM

Pan Paka Pan <3
*******
Senior Member
2,514 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: [Confidential]

Thinking of adding another lens for my D90.Standard zoom f/2.8

Does the 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED seem a good choice or do I have to wait for people to scream 24-70mm f/2.8 (Which I can use for FX if I so desire to jump) at my face again?
Everdying
post Apr 30 2014, 05:57 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Apr 30 2014, 05:52 PM)
Thinking of adding another lens for my D90.Standard zoom f/2.8

Does the 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED seem a good choice or do I have to wait for people to scream 24-70mm f/2.8 (Which I can use for FX if I so desire to jump) at my face again?
*
cheaper go tamron 17-50.
but 17-55 is good if u got the money, used around rm3k.

buy for the now...maybe later u dont go FX? maybe go Fuji? tongue.gif

gerald7
post Apr 30 2014, 06:17 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,452 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


QUOTE(f5calvin @ Apr 30 2014, 12:14 AM)
no amoi le... sadddloorrrr
Tanakwagu_noh
post May 1 2014, 12:39 AM

Photographer
*****
Senior Member
866 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: "Pak Pak Kangku Noh"



1 May 2014 Spam icon_rolleyes.gif

user posted image

f5calvin
post May 1 2014, 12:49 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Apr 30 2014, 05:52 PM)
Thinking of adding another lens for my D90.Standard zoom f/2.8

Does the 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED seem a good choice or do I have to wait for people to scream 24-70mm f/2.8 (Which I can use for FX if I so desire to jump) at my face again?
*
if u want the 17-55 range, get the tamron 17-50 or the sigma 17-50. they perform almost as good just that some tamron has af back/front focus. and some siggy has it's OS problem. else get the tamron 24-70 VC.

QUOTE(gerald7 @ Apr 30 2014, 06:17 PM)
no amoi le... sadddloorrrr
*
no chance snap amoi. >.<
teetaatee
post May 1 2014, 02:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,061 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Tanakwagu_noh @ May 1 2014, 12:39 AM)
1 May 2014 Spam  icon_rolleyes.gif

user posted image
*
thumbup.gif power notworthy.gif
mingyuyu
post May 1 2014, 10:24 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 30 2014, 04:45 PM)
Macro shots for today thumbup.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
nice macro as usual, your 2nd and 3rd shots reminded me my own shots haha, so identical.

user posted imageIMG_0588 by tuna97, on Flickr

user posted imageIMG_1132 by tuna97, on Flickr
[PF] T.J.
post May 1 2014, 08:19 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ May 1 2014, 10:24 AM)
nice macro as usual, your 2nd and 3rd shots reminded me my own shots haha, so identical.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Thanks mate!
Hey are right haha, they are really similar, even the species are the same! notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

Oh well... great minds think alike wub.gif
huislaw
post May 2 2014, 11:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,344 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


Hi guys,

My friend's D300 screens are blank and no light when try to turn on.
Tried with 2 charged batteries and also performed the 2 green button reset.
What else could be the issue?
gunzerdude
post May 2 2014, 12:32 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


To all photo kaki here!! Please help me with my questionnaire biggrin.gif

The Viewfinder Questionnaire

Here's a bug kowtowing as thanks brows.gif brows.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif


user posted image
jchue73
post May 2 2014, 03:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(wkwong91 @ Apr 29 2014, 09:27 AM)
So Sigma can be consider too beside than the Tokina or Nikon?
*
Try and do a search. A few years back, the choice was about equal in between the Tokina and Sigma. I believe picture quality and sharpness at wide open goes to Tokina but at f/8 apertures, everything becomes the same. smile.gif

So for me, the 10mm and faster HSM motor was the deciding factor.

QUOTE(ongdennis @ Apr 30 2014, 12:31 AM)
after very long time...only able to continue the "dot-tune" for all my prime lens.

the adjustment seem very huge

nikon 50mm f1.8g --> -6
nikon 85mm f1.8g --> -10
tamron sp90 f2.8   --> +18

testing the result using newspaper and it seem working fine.
*
Before you perform this test, did you disable AF engagement for shutter half-press? Set the "AF Activation" option to "AF-ON only". For D600 it's option f4 if not wrong and since no dedicated button on D600 (and D7000) for AF-On, use the AE-L/AF-L button as the AF-ON button.

Also, for the test to be accurate, you need to make sure that your camera sensor is parallel to the newspaper or any intended object and also on the same plane.

For that you need something like LensAlign to correctly place the target and make the test more meaningful as you can manually set and determine the focal plane of the target to be parallel to the camera sensor plane.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 30 2014, 07:56 AM)
Both different types of lens, do you need the 200mm reach? If yes then its the 70200. If not you just want the big aperture and 85mm range is ok then go for the prime.
*
200mm can also have big aperture. At f/2.0 lah. biggrin.gif

QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Apr 30 2014, 05:52 PM)
Thinking of adding another lens for my D90.Standard zoom f/2.8

Does the 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED seem a good choice or do I have to wait for people to scream 24-70mm f/2.8 (Which I can use for FX if I so desire to jump) at my face again?
*
Difficult question. But you can opt to buy the 17-55mm f/2.8 Nikon at 2nd hand prices and still sell them for a reasonable price should you decide to upgrade later on. Or you can get 3rd party lenses and sell later at lower prices should you decide to upgrade later.

The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 is beautiful lens. It's a lot of money but I don't think it suites well on the DX crop. Yeah some say ok but to me, it's not wide enough. If you have wider lenses, then you can got for it but if you don't have wider lenses, then save the money and look elsewhere. It's not a limited edition lens. When you want to buy it later after upgrading to FX, it will always be available.

This post has been edited by jchue73: May 2 2014, 04:00 PM
mingyuyu
post May 2 2014, 06:03 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(jchue73 @ May 2 2014, 03:52 PM)
Try and do a search. A few years back, the choice was about equal in between the Tokina and Sigma. I believe picture quality and sharpness at wide open goes to Tokina but at f/8 apertures, everything becomes the same.  smile.gif

So for me, the 10mm and faster HSM motor was the deciding factor.
Before you perform this test, did you disable AF engagement for shutter half-press? Set the "AF Activation" option to "AF-ON only". For D600 it's option f4 if not wrong and since no dedicated button on D600 (and D7000) for AF-On, use the AE-L/AF-L button as the AF-ON button.

Also, for the test to be accurate, you need to make sure that your camera sensor is parallel to the newspaper or any intended object and also on the same plane.

For that you need something like LensAlign to correctly place the target and make the test more meaningful as you can manually set and determine the focal plane of the target to be parallel to the camera sensor plane.

200mm can also have big aperture. At f/2.0 lah.  biggrin.gif
Difficult question. But you can opt to buy the 17-55mm f/2.8 Nikon at 2nd hand prices and still sell them for a reasonable price should you decide to upgrade later on. Or you can get 3rd party lenses and sell later at lower prices should you decide to upgrade later.

The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 is beautiful lens. It's a lot of money but I don't think it suites well on the DX crop. Yeah some say ok but to me, it's not wide enough. If you have wider lenses, then you can got for it but if you don't have wider lenses, then save the money and look elsewhere. It's not a limited edition lens. When you want to buy it later after upgrading to FX, it will always be available.
*

hmm.gif

paiseh for asking, but why the 17-55 so crazily expensive arh? no IS no VR or whatever. canon equivalent is like 500-1k cheaper with IS.
Pro3363
post May 2 2014, 06:20 PM

Aiming high to stay flying
Group Icon
Elite
1,193 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Miri, Sarawak



Too bad the tree is there.. Should have brought a knife jk... laugh.gif

user posted image
Tengalalang, Bali by colinleezl, on Flickr

QUOTE(jchue73 @ May 2 2014, 03:52 PM)

200mm can also have big aperture. At f/2.0 lah.  biggrin.gif
*
Need to sell organ baru can buy icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by Pro3363: May 2 2014, 06:23 PM
celciuz
post May 2 2014, 07:59 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ May 2 2014, 03:52 PM)
Try and do a search. A few years back, the choice was about equal in between the Tokina and Sigma. I believe picture quality and sharpness at wide open goes to Tokina but at f/8 apertures, everything becomes the same.  smile.gif

So for me, the 10mm and faster HSM motor was the deciding factor.
Before you perform this test, did you disable AF engagement for shutter half-press? Set the "AF Activation" option to "AF-ON only". For D600 it's option f4 if not wrong and since no dedicated button on D600 (and D7000) for AF-On, use the AE-L/AF-L button as the AF-ON button.

Also, for the test to be accurate, you need to make sure that your camera sensor is parallel to the newspaper or any intended object and also on the same plane.

For that you need something like LensAlign to correctly place the target and make the test more meaningful as you can manually set and determine the focal plane of the target to be parallel to the camera sensor plane.

200mm can also have big aperture. At f/2.0 lah.  biggrin.gif
Difficult question. But you can opt to buy the 17-55mm f/2.8 Nikon at 2nd hand prices and still sell them for a reasonable price should you decide to upgrade later on. Or you can get 3rd party lenses and sell later at lower prices should you decide to upgrade later.

The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 is beautiful lens. It's a lot of money but I don't think it suites well on the DX crop. Yeah some say ok but to me, it's not wide enough. If you have wider lenses, then you can got for it but if you don't have wider lenses, then save the money and look elsewhere. It's not a limited edition lens. When you want to buy it later after upgrading to FX, it will always be available.
*
Back and bank breaker, the 200mm f/2 I mean tongue.gif

128 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0269sec    0.55    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 02:01 AM