Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

826 Pages « < 203 204 205 206 207 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Home Networking ASUS Malaysia Networking User & Technical Support, Managed by ASUS Malaysia Representative

views
     
soonwai
post Jan 13 2016, 11:14 AM


********
All Stars
11,458 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(ericlawyh @ Jan 13 2016, 10:45 AM)
Seems like I really have to buy another decent NAS just to meet my simple expectation.

In summary:
- Wireless file transfer using normal Windows Explorer Copy & Paste: 1.74MB/s
- Wireless file transfer using SCP Protocol: 0.05625MB/s Download, 0.0875MB/s Upload
*
Probably a CPU limitation. Check your router's CPU usage. If it goes to 100% when transferring at 1.74MB/s then that's all you gonna get. What can I say? It's a router not an NAS.

Even my old DLink DNS-323 "NAS" only serves files at about 3-4MB/s. The older model Airport Extreme Base Station and my Mikrotik RB751G both do 2-3MB/s. Test were done using SMB. I'm currently using an RB2011 with a faster CPU so it may fare a bit better.

ericlawyh
post Jan 13 2016, 11:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(soonwai @ Jan 13 2016, 11:14 AM)
Probably a CPU limitation. Check your router's CPU usage. If it goes to 100% when transferring at 1.74MB/s then that's all you gonna get. What can I say? It's a router not an NAS.

Even my old DLink DNS-323 "NAS" only serves files at about 3-4MB/s. The older model Airport Extreme Base Station and my Mikrotik RB751G both do 2-3MB/s. Test were done using SMB. I'm currently using an RB2011 with a faster CPU so it may fare a bit better.
*
I do agree it's a router and not a full fledged NAS.

But, even your "old" gadgets still have the better performance than a"new" 2015 model of RT-AC1200HP's 1.74MB/s.
wcypierre
post Jan 13 2016, 11:29 AM

Newbie Programmer
Group Icon
Elite
4,619 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
SCP will be slower compared to NFS/Samba, especially when it uses a "stronger" encryption method. Regardless, it does look slow, even my raspi can deliver more than that on 802.11n.

Check on your cpu usage and have you set any QoS/firewall settings?

This post has been edited by wcypierre: Jan 13 2016, 11:29 AM
ericlawyh
post Jan 13 2016, 11:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(wcypierre @ Jan 13 2016, 11:29 AM)
SCP will be slower compared to NFS/Samba, especially when it uses a "stronger" encryption method. Regardless, it does look slow, even my raspi can deliver more than that on 802.11n.

Check on your cpu usage and have you set any QoS/firewall settings?
*
Will check the router's CPU usage when back home tonight.

As I'm still using VIP 10, hence the QoS has been set as 10Mbps for both download & upload with default firewall.

Let's see whether ASUSmy can reproduce this symptom or not...
wcypierre
post Jan 13 2016, 11:42 AM

Newbie Programmer
Group Icon
Elite
4,619 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ericlawyh @ Jan 13 2016, 11:39 AM)
Will check the router's CPU usage when back home tonight.

As I'm still using VIP 10, hence the QoS has been set as 10Mbps for both download & upload with default firewall.

Let's see whether ASUSmy can reproduce this symptom or not...
*
Remove the QoS and try again.
ericlawyh
post Jan 13 2016, 11:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(wcypierre @ Jan 13 2016, 11:42 AM)
Remove the QoS and try again.
*
Will try that as well.

If QoS was the culprit, then the router's firmware is buggy.

Based on my understanding, QoS would only manage the WAN download / upload bandwidth, and shouldn't restrict the internal LAN speed.
wcypierre
post Jan 13 2016, 12:02 PM

Newbie Programmer
Group Icon
Elite
4,619 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ericlawyh @ Jan 13 2016, 11:46 AM)
Will try that as well.

If QoS was the culprit, then the router's firmware is buggy.

Based on my understanding, QoS would only manage the WAN download / upload bandwidth, and shouldn't restrict the internal LAN speed.
*
I don't have any experience with Asus router's web interface, but afaik unless you've set a specific filter to limit it to a subnet/domain/ip/port/interface, otherwise it would apply the rule for all packets.
ericlawyh
post Jan 13 2016, 12:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(wcypierre @ Jan 13 2016, 12:02 PM)
I don't have any experience with Asus router's web interface, but afaik unless you've set a specific filter to limit it to a subnet/domain/ip/port/interface, otherwise it would apply the rule for all packets.
*
Well, I didn't set any particular limit on subnet/domain/ip/port/interface.

You may have a look on its dummy configuration screen below:
http://event.asus.com/2012/nw/dummy_ui/en/QoS_EZQoS.html
wcypierre
post Jan 13 2016, 12:39 PM

Newbie Programmer
Group Icon
Elite
4,619 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ericlawyh @ Jan 13 2016, 12:20 PM)
Well, I didn't set any particular limit on subnet/domain/ip/port/interface.

You may have a look on its dummy configuration screen below:
http://event.asus.com/2012/nw/dummy_ui/en/QoS_EZQoS.html
*
what I meant is if you didn't set any filter on any particular subnet/domain/ip/port/interface, your qos should be applied for both lan and wan.

QUOTE
After applied the QoS rules, the router will check all network packets from LAN to WAN.

https://www.asus.com/support/faq/113967/
ericlawyh
post Jan 13 2016, 01:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(wcypierre @ Jan 13 2016, 12:39 PM)
what I meant is if you didn't set any filter on any particular subnet/domain/ip/port/interface, your qos should be applied for both lan and wan.
https://www.asus.com/support/faq/113967/
*
Thanks dude. You're doing the job for ASUSmy. sweat.gif

Nevertheless, I still unable to correlate the QoS restriction on port 80 with the internal wireless LAN file transfer.

QUOTE
There are two QoS rule for the 80 port, (1) Web surf and (2) File Transfer. If the each 80 port cumulated session size under 512 KB, it may be a normal web surfing.
If the cumulated session size over 512KB, it may be a file download via 80 port.
The purpose of our default rules is to set file transfer with low priority and it would not influence the web surfing.
If you want the high file download speed via HTTP, you can modified the default rules.
* The cumulated session size is summation of upload stream and download stream.
TSASUSmy
post Jan 13 2016, 01:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,319 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(Netto Hikari @ Jan 12 2016, 10:58 PM)
@ASUSmy
i tried both maxis mode available in the drop down menu, but still cannot connect.
*
Hi Netto Hikari,

Can you try updating the firmware to the latest and do a factory reset.

If still cannot, can you provide me your setting and log files from the router and I will help you check.

I will PM you my e-mail address.

Thank you.


TSASUSmy
post Jan 13 2016, 01:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,319 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(ericlawyh @ Jan 12 2016, 10:52 PM)
Bear in mind that, the now-aging USB 2.0 standard can theoretically transfer data at a very high 480 megabits per second (mbps), or 60 megabytes per second (MBps).

But, what happened to the ASUS Router NAS performance throughput? Can you provide the actual tested performance statistics for the higher grade AC class routers?

Below are the screenshots for your reference.

File transfer rate when connecting the HDD via USB 2.0:
[attachmentid=5784080]

File transfer rate when connecting the HDD via USB 3.0
[attachmentid=5784081]

Wifi Adapter properties:
[attachmentid=5784082]
*
Hi ericlawyh,

Thank you for the information, may I know when you connected to the 5GHz, what is the data rate that you get for your WiFi.

Thank you


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
TSASUSmy
post Jan 13 2016, 01:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,319 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(ericlawyh @ Jan 13 2016, 11:06 AM)
Hello ASUSmy

Is the QoS issue still remain unresolved in RT-AC1200HP?

http://www.snbforums.com/threads/slow-lan-...s-enabled.9967/
*
Hi ericlawyh,

The QoS issue is 2 years ago, do you have this problem when you enabling the QoS?

Thank you
ericlawyh
post Jan 13 2016, 02:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(ASUSmy @ Jan 13 2016, 01:51 PM)
Hi ericlawyh,

The QoS issue is 2 years ago, do you have this problem when you enabling the QoS?

Thank you
*
The current issues in summary:
- Wireless file transfer using normal Windows Explorer Copy & Paste: 1.74MB/s
- Wireless file transfer using SCP Protocol: 0.05625MB/s Download, 0.0875MB/s Upload

I'm not sure whether it's QoS related issues.

Kindly reproduce this symptom in your environment and advice on the optimize setting for wireless LAN file transfer.
ycs
post Jan 13 2016, 05:27 PM

MEMBER
*******
Senior Member
4,232 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Selangor



@ASUSmy,

bit torent on N56U Firmware Version:3.0.0.4.378_4850 router seems cannot max out download speed, no QOS

is there any extra settings needed?
jusbella
post Jan 13 2016, 05:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,037 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


port forward.

if still same, its ISP capped P2P traffic.

QUOTE(ycs @ Jan 13 2016, 05:27 PM)
@ASUSmy,

bit torent on N56U Firmware Version:3.0.0.4.378_4850 router seems cannot max out download speed, no QOS

is there any extra settings needed?
*
djhenry91
post Jan 13 2016, 08:41 PM

Slow and Steady
*******
Senior Member
6,779 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: SEGI Heaven


Attached Image
when RAM left 1 MB sweat.gif sweat.gif
wcypierre
post Jan 13 2016, 08:50 PM

Newbie Programmer
Group Icon
Elite
4,619 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(djhenry91 @ Jan 13 2016, 08:41 PM)
Attached Image
when RAM left 1 MB  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
*
what other services are you running?
djhenry91
post Jan 13 2016, 09:26 PM

Slow and Steady
*******
Senior Member
6,779 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: SEGI Heaven


no idea..i think too many device??
OKLY
post Jan 13 2016, 09:53 PM

The Penguin Vader
Group Icon
Staff
12,090 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(djhenry91 @ Jan 13 2016, 08:41 PM)
Attached Image
when RAM left 1 MB  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
*
Perhaps you have many open connections as well from P2P/torrent applications etc? Mine on fresh boot has 3MB of free RAM only.

826 Pages « < 203 204 205 206 207 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0235sec    0.84    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 07:03 PM