QUOTE(Mackiddo @ Nov 3 2011, 02:40 PM)
No he's not.
Singapore Traffic Police is governing the driving license. Why would it mention about foreign car when we are in Singapore ?
Foreign vehicles will fall into LTA, because LTA specifically mentioning the rules about foreign vehicles. LTA guideline still the same, to operate a foreign vehicles, you have to follow the guidelines set them, etc... not Singaporean/SPR, no residential address in Sg, car must insured under driver's name, bla bla bla
There's is no such things as 'allowance' under Sg rules.
Think i'll just stop explaining and let you guys interpret is as the way you like

I am only interested in what's wrong or what's right. I don't care who's wrong or who's right.
If I happens to be in the wrong and you want a personal apology, I am all too willing to give it to you.
We don't want any fellow forummers to get into trouble for listening to our advice right?
It's not interpretation problem. It's what's the correct interpretation of the law. The law is clear in this front.
SPF rules regulates
how you drive (traffic rules) and
whether you can drive (valid driving license) in the country.
LTA rules regulates
what you can drive in and out of the country.
They complements each other and are not mutually exclusive which is what you are claiming for the
whether you can drive part.
So, are you saying SPF has no jurisdiction on people who have the privilege of driving a foreign car?
That's nice if true but that is also so wrong. SPF are in charge of traffic and they enforces the laws for driving in Singapore.
Notice also how LTA guidelines never mention about how you should behave when your driving in Singapore or whether you need to have a valid driving license.
That's because that's under SPF jurisdiction. LTA only controls what gets to go in and out.
Going by your logic, I can drive without a driving license and apply the traffic rules of my country since LTA trumps SPF.
When SPF stops me I can ask them to screw themselves since I am under LTA jurisdiction.
Does that make any sense? I can imagine how SPF will like that. I will probably be thrown into jail overnight for being intoxicated.
Laws either complement or supercede each other when there's overlap or conflicts. They never ignores each other.
Since I don't see any overlap or conflicts yet, both LTA and SPF rules apply.
It's problem when issues happen. Come on lah, this is kiasi-land, we need to protect ourselves.
Why would anyone from this forum purposely wants to be on the wrong side of the law?
Well, at least the major ones with serious implications like jail or death penalty.
I am sure everyone breaks the small laws like jay walking once in a while.
"allowances" only works with "under the table" dealings.
What happens when you knocked down an old Singapore man and makes it to headline news?
You sure you can get out of it with a Malaysian license if it's against the law?
Granted, knocking down someone to make it to headline news gives you a totally different set of problems but one less problem is one less problem.
This post has been edited by precursor80: Nov 3 2011, 03:54 PM