QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 13 2011, 09:02 AM)
8.5k ?
okay boss.... body only?
Well, such level of bodies don't usually come bundled with lens.
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Sep 13 2011, 09:39 AM)
8.5k? Dayummm!!!
I think most likely I will still have to buy D700 just like how I decided to buy D90 last time even though my friends ask me to wait for another 4 months for D7000 to come out!!!
It is just a rough estimation comparing to D700's launch price. You can't expect the D800 to be priced at the current RM6000 of D700 right?
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 13 2011, 10:44 AM)
last time i watch review about D700, is that live view of D700 is still slower a bit?
like start up or etc...now lazy watch again XD
Main reason people use DSLR is for the optical viewfinder... to be frank, I rarely use my live view. Used once or twice, that is also for framing for landscape since LV has 100% coverage. If I'm using D3s or something, I don't think I will even be touching on the LV.
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Sep 13 2011, 10:57 AM)
D3s... lolz... The Ferrari of Nikon DSLRs.... expensive wei!
Top of the range, Italia?

Added on September 13, 2011, 12:32 pmQUOTE(darkavenger @ Sep 13 2011, 11:21 AM)
Hi,
I'm not satisfied with D90's AF — it's quite primitive when compared to D7000. I've tried shooting with the latter and the difference is big. Not only in AF but also colors, sharpness and dynamic range. Also, it records in 1080p with AF in video mode ;D
Edit: A good site to compare cameras
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_D7000-vs-Nikon_D90Somehow I feel D7000's AF advantage over the D90 is more cross sensors, and better coverage. But the non cross sensor still perform as bad as D90's non cross sensor. The same goes to my D700's 51AF, the non cross sensors isn't good.
Well... if the D800 has better coverage of cross sensor... I'm in for upgrade xD.
This post has been edited by celciuz: Sep 13 2011, 12:32 PM