Thank you for the recommendation! haha Im starting to think about the 1.8 now.. Price difference im not really sure but if it really does give better pictures im alright with it ...
there are people in other forums also mentioning that d7000 has their own motor, so the G series of the newer lenses is not worth the price and told everyone to use the D instead
Thank you all for your kind time helping me out ofcourse buying so much of equipments would not make me a better photographer..
oh btw i bought this book from times at pavilion its called magic lantern d7000 multimedia workshop.. not really useful thou since most of the information can be actually obtained on the internet so don't get that hehe
Nikon 50mm 1.8g's bokeh is better than the d one..
The D7000 + BG + 17-55 taking up one compartment is attached or detached? Still left one compartment for another D7000 + 85G and left one last compartment for lenses and flashguns?
And btw, i've heard people in forum kept saying if you're using DX body, get 35mm and it will crop to 50mm, but 35mm is a DX lens isn't it? =\ how it will crop?
Both comes with 8GB SD card + DSLR Bag + Nikon Malaysia warranty
Why i go for D7000, Magnesium alloy, ergonomic, heavy (easier to control for me), 6 fps, these are the list why i wanted to get As for alternate reason, my mom tell me, if wan buy straight away get a good one .
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 2 2011, 07:31 PM
Newbie to DSLR. Just got meself a d7000 kit and still going thru the manual. my dream was to get a nikon when was young but could not afford. After busy with other commitment, finally
Need advice, I need to get either a 35mm or 50mm for regular day to day shots of kids at home. am confused which lens can be autofocus. saw some 1.8G or 1.8D, i think which is below rm800 as compare to 1.4. need to ask if i get the D (cheaper), would it have autofocus? I know the G got autofocus.
Thanks ya.
You should know that your D7000 has built-in motor which allows your older lens to auto focus if you read through your manual.
Why not get familiar with your kit lens first before prime? What reason(s) support your decision to get the prime? Care to share out?
I would like to share mine, i decided to get d7000 + kit + 35mm f1.8g, reason why i get that prime is because i know i'm going to shoot a lot of portrait shot + the bokehness, and of course some family photos or friends, and i know most of the place i will be are low lights, the f1.8 will helps a lot.
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 3 2011, 08:00 PM
I would like to recommend you to get the BG as well since you expecting to take lots of portraiture
Flashgun may be not necessary, but it's good to have especially when you're shooting in low lights area. I'll be getting a 50mm f/1.8G this weekend. Finally after the long waits
What's BG again i remember i asked before lol, but forgotten what is it. :S
EDIT: oh nvm, remember'ed, it is battery grip.
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 3 2011, 08:37 PM
Fair enough. Hopefully you realise that owning the 35mm f/1.8 (or any good lens for that matter) does not do magic and automatically get you better pictures. You will be faced with different problems which is mostly user related. On a side note, it does not matter if it's FX or DX lens. Once mounted on a DX body, the 50mm FX lens gets a 75mm FOV.
Don't know want buy 16-85 or 18-105 or 18-55 ler... All the quality same right?
16-85 consider to be a wide angle shooting, the lower value of the first 2 digit is, the wider the photo you shoot will be, and price also will be more pretty.
Instead of getting 16-85mm, i'd rather you go with the kit lens first, you're getting D7000 right? Play with it and see how it goes, and see what's great for you, from my POV you still don't know what kind of stuff you going to shoot, that's why i came up with this conclusion for you.
As for whether to go for 16-85 or not, i'd rather you go for a "true" wide angle instead of this, with that price you can get a Sigma 10-20mm which is a true wide angle lens.
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 12 2011, 04:20 PM
And why people want to buy lens with single focal length like 55mm and not straight away buy zoom lens like 18-55mm with 55mm included in it?
First off, bigger aperture = more light can be absorb = pwns in low light shooting 2nd, better lens quality = produce sharper image 3rd, BOKEHLICIOUSSSSS
the rest, you might need to ask other people, i only know this 2 so far. :S
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 12 2011, 07:06 PM
I think what he meant was 18-105 or 18-55 lens. Not referring to a 55mm prime.
obviously he's talking about prime... single focal length = prime ...
well eugene, just come over to lowyat and shop for camera and pray that you don't get conned that's it, price here is like pasar malam, no doubt those camera shop in the mall near your house have to sell it at higher price due to the rental and not actually everyone shop for gadgets in those mall, people are funny sometimes, they love to shop for expensive stuff at place with a lot people around, they actually feel proud about it, but of course, price will be cheaper a lot, but it all depends on how well is your negotiation skill.
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 12 2011, 09:16 PM
If u say so bro. Unless he's talking about manual focus 55mm from decades ago, then have fun finding a 55mm prime
Obviously he still don't know anything about prime lens... but from the post its clearly stating he's talking about prime, work up your common sense bro.
And eugene please clear things out before the flame is in.
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 12 2011, 09:18 PM
Nah... still far away from it. Gonna practice on my photography skills first before heading to professional class equipment. No point getting there if my skill wasn't able to fully utilize it Cool down guys
Based from my point of view, he is more like asking why get 50mm single focal length lens when it's already covered by 18-55mm
That's why i answered eugene with the thing i know about primes, but someone seems to not like my explanation or something.
so like i said kEazYc , sorry that you've mistaken for 'knowing' your primes 55mm i heard u say? unless its an old MF lens from the film era like i mentioned earlier...
if its the 50mm you're on about, eugene, then if u have the money (which isnt a lot for an f/1.8 glass), go ahead and have a try. most ppl wont be dissapointed with it.
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Aug 12 2011, 11:49 PM)
I suppose you're trying to say... why bother 50mm prime (single focal length) when you can have it covered with 18-55mm zoom lens.
One that differentiates between a prime and zoom lens is the aperture. Since you're new, try google and read about the exposure triangle (Aperture + Shutter Speed + ISO). It's basic and foundation to photography.
Single focus length lens or prime usually has big aperture (smaller the f value, larger the aperture).
Example 50mm f/1.8D or f/1.8G vs 18-55 f/3.5-5.6G. The largest aperture on the 50mm prime is f/1.8 while on the 18-55mm would be f/5.6 maximum on the 55mm end. If you did the googling job above, you should understands how aperture could affect your photo output
QUOTE(eugene88 @ Aug 12 2011, 11:56 PM)
That is what I wanted to ask And the difference between AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D and AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G?
/rantends
This post has been edited by kEazYc: Aug 13 2011, 01:20 AM