Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

64 Pages « < 22 23 24 25 26 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Linux/BSD/FOSS General Chat & FAQ, Post whatever questions you have....

views
     
khakilang
post Jan 8 2011, 04:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
174 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(farkinid @ Jan 7 2011, 02:40 PM)
The only to prevent a drive from being formatted is physical write protection. I really can't imagine what sort of physical write protection is there on a hard drive. Are those special hard drives or soemthing?

If not, then DBAN is your next option.
*
Thanks! Already download and will try later. Hope it work. The hard disk seem ok. I got a feeling it was write protect or something. The hard disk brand is Seagate Barracuda 40GB IDE drives OEM. Nothing special about the drive. One more question. What software can actually write protect the hard disk? Any ideas anyone? Thanks again to those who help.

rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
farkinid
post Jan 8 2011, 05:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
997 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


Software write protection is program based. It may be a feature of the OS or a program. The only other thing I can imagine is firmware based write protection? I never heard of that before. Maybe someone here can enlighten me. Apart from that, if its software based, just bypass it by not loading the hard drive at all (ie DBAN).
powerwoot
post Jan 8 2011, 10:50 PM

讨厌的 ubuntu
*******
Senior Member
2,930 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kolej Universiti Agrosains Malaysia, Melaka



I feel weird with crunchbang linux, for the 1st adding nomodeset in the kernel parameter I can get my display. Now not anymore.... inherit some nvidia bug especially from debian derivatives is so ... mad.gif 1st Julia, 2nd LMDE now crunchbang.
khakilang
post Jan 9 2011, 12:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
174 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(farkinid @ Jan 8 2011, 05:01 PM)
Software write protection is program based. It may be a feature of the OS or a program. The only other thing I can imagine is firmware based write protection? I never heard of that before. Maybe someone here can enlighten me. Apart from that, if its software based, just bypass it by not loading the hard drive at all (ie DBAN).
*
No luck with DBAN after several attempt. I try different method to wipe but it come with a non fatal error. I think it is a bad sector or a bad block. Any more ideas? I think it is a waste of a good hard disk. Anyway thank you guy for the guidance.

rclxub.gif rclxub.gif rclxub.gif
powerwoot
post Jan 9 2011, 12:15 PM

讨厌的 ubuntu
*******
Senior Member
2,930 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kolej Universiti Agrosains Malaysia, Melaka



Currently testing the PClinuxOS E17 replacing my crunchbang due to it's unfriendly behavior to my nvidia 9400gt gc.
khakilang
post Jan 9 2011, 12:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
174 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
I have a PCLinuxOS XFCE on 1 of my older computer. Its work great. I think they are 1 of the top ten on the Distrowatch.
TSG-17
post Jan 9 2011, 03:33 PM

Securely Paranoid
******
Senior Member
1,748 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(powerwoot @ Jan 9 2011, 12:15 PM)
Currently testing the PClinuxOS E17 replacing my crunchbang due to it's unfriendly behavior to my nvidia 9400gt  gc.
*

I've had no problem running CrunchBang (and Debian in general) with a 9400gt, though mine doesn't have a 'gc' at the end.

Here's what I usually do for Nvidia on Debian.

As Root, add these lines to the end of your /etc/apt/sources.list to enable Sid/Unstable sources (don't worry, we'll remove them once we install and activate the Nvidia drivers)

QUOTE
# Unstable Sid
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
# Unstable Sources
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free


Then, in root terminal (or add sudo to beginning of each line if you're a sudoer)
CODE
apt-get update


Install Nvidia Kernel Source
CODE
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-kernel-source



Get Module assistant to recognize
CODE
m-a a-i nvidia-kernel-source


Install Nvidia Glx
CODE
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-glx


Install Xconfig and Nvidia Settings
CODE
apt-get install nvidia-xconfig nvidia-settings


Then run
CODE
nvidia-xconfig


Note: never combine all the apps installed above in a single line, and use them in steps like I've listed, as they tend to configure stuff as they're installed. Also, make sure your terminal is fullscreen to prevent some dialog boxes being cut off.

Reboot.
If everything was successful, you should get into X without problems. You can then launch the Nvidia Control Panel via 'nvidia-settings' (either with your terminal or dmenu (alt-f3), and later creating a menu entry if you want)

You can also install vdpau drivers for HD playback if you desire. Currently, only mplayer supports vdpau (either via console or it's gnome-mplayer or smplayer frontends)
CODE
apt-get install nvidia-vdpau-driver


Once you've confirmed everything works properly, you should remove the Unstable related lines from your /etc/apt/sources.list .... unless you actually want an Unstable/Sid based system.





scorps
post Jan 9 2011, 04:22 PM

Something you call love, but I call sex
*******
Senior Member
9,572 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Terengganu Darul Iman



why after update upgrade to other kernel version, need to reinstall back Nvidia driver?
axxer
post Jan 9 2011, 04:36 PM

Banned
******
Validating
1,822 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Yesterday, 01:25 AM
wow.. got another liquorix kernel update. 3 updates in a week. damentz is really something shocking.gif shocking.gif
TSG-17
post Jan 9 2011, 04:39 PM

Securely Paranoid
******
Senior Member
1,748 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(scorps @ Jan 9 2011, 04:22 PM)
why after update upgrade to other kernel version, need to reinstall back Nvidia driver?
*
If you configure the module assistant like I said (the "m-a a-i" line above), you (in theory) don't need to re-enable the Nvidia drivers each time.

BUT.....

There are exceptions and sometimes you'll need to perform additional steps, particularly if you're on a volatile setup with mixed Unstable/Experimental sources/packages/kernels.

If so, you can try performing these additional steps each time you get a new kernel version, and reboot/restart X;

CODE
m-a a-i nvidia-kernel-source
apt-get install --reinstall nvidia-glx


For me, the best metcho if you run a constantly changing (rolling) system is to use the Aptosid/Sidux recommended method, but this requires a specific package called dmakms that's only available by adding Aptosid sources, so your mileage may vary.
You don't really need this if you use a Debian Squeeze/Testing setup, though...
http://manual.aptosid.com/en/hw-dev-hw-dri...htm#non-free-3d


Added on January 9, 2011, 4:43 pm
QUOTE(axxer @ Jan 9 2011, 04:36 PM)
wow.. got another liquorix kernel update. 3 updates in a week. damentz is really something  shocking.gif  shocking.gif
*

On my GRML/Unstable setup, I sometimes recompile my custom kernel every 3 days, due to some patches that keep getting updated/reintroduced. Damentz is quite similar in that he likes to incorporate the latest as quickly as possible for users to test and give feedback.

It's not so bad like in my Gentoo days, though ... those days I spent more time recompiling than I did actually using the system... and half the time, it broke everything >_<


This post has been edited by G-17: Jan 9 2011, 04:43 PM
scorps
post Jan 9 2011, 05:18 PM

Something you call love, but I call sex
*******
Senior Member
9,572 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Terengganu Darul Iman



QUOTE(G-17 @ Jan 9 2011, 05:39 PM)
If you configure the module assistant like I said (the "m-a a-i" line above), you (in theory) don't need to re-enable the Nvidia drivers each time.

BUT.....

There are exceptions and sometimes you'll need to perform additional steps, particularly if you're on a volatile setup with mixed Unstable/Experimental sources/packages/kernels.

If so, you can try performing these additional steps each time you get a new kernel version, and reboot/restart X;

CODE
m-a a-i nvidia-kernel-source
apt-get install --reinstall nvidia-glx


For me, the best metcho if you run a constantly changing (rolling) system is to use the Aptosid/Sidux recommended method, but this requires a specific package called dmakms that's only available by adding Aptosid sources, so your mileage may vary.
You don't really need this if you use a Debian Squeeze/Testing setup, though...
http://manual.aptosid.com/en/hw-dev-hw-dri...htm#non-free-3d

*
i got the NVIDIA driver from here http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html


if i do as what you stated above, i think the Nvidia driver not the latest from the Nvidia page,am i right? unsure.gif
powerwoot
post Jan 9 2011, 06:49 PM

讨厌的 ubuntu
*******
Senior Member
2,930 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kolej Universiti Agrosains Malaysia, Melaka



QUOTE(G-17 @ Jan 9 2011, 03:33 PM)
I've had no problem running CrunchBang (and Debian in general) with a 9400gt, though mine doesn't have a 'gc' at the end.
gc is a short of graphic card, actually this is what really happen in crunchbang. On live session everything was perfect with correct reso I am supposed to have, hard install after the grub I am unable to get display as the monitor will goes to black or save mode. This is common as it will happen in Julia and LMDE and the only workaround is during the grub, within the kernel parameter adding the 'nomodeset' or 'nouveau.modeset=0" after 'ro' I'll get my display and install the correct driver as you mentioned.

Crunchbang, at first it worked well, I am getting my display. But the 2nd attempt nothing is working I am getting no display before I am able to download the correct driver. Restart, it can but cannot at other time. Some nvidia gcs are not so ngam with certain distro i.e Mint 10, LMDE, crunchbang. Other distro such as opensuse, on the 1st boot we'll get working opensource nouveau driver. PClinuxOS on the 1st boot I am getting the latest non free nvidia driver 260.19.29! ohmy.gif

wanfaris
post Jan 9 2011, 06:57 PM

O_o
******
Senior Member
1,439 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


sorry,noob ques here... rclxms.gif

can i use ubuntu netbook 10.10 OS on pc??i mean 1920x1080 pc??

This post has been edited by wanfaris: Jan 9 2011, 06:58 PM
GameSky
post Jan 9 2011, 07:06 PM

Nyancat too much
*******
Senior Member
6,381 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: meow meow
audacious tempted to crash often on my side sweat.gif
cocooh
post Jan 9 2011, 07:30 PM

✔ Awesomeness ✔
*******
Senior Member
2,789 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Silicon Valley


QUOTE(wanfaris @ Jan 9 2011, 06:57 PM)
sorry,noob ques here... rclxms.gif

can i use ubuntu netbook 10.10 OS on pc??i mean 1920x1080 pc??
*
of course
farkinid
post Jan 10 2011, 09:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
997 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


QUOTE(khakilang @ Jan 9 2011, 12:05 PM)
No luck with DBAN after several attempt. I try different method to wipe but it come with a non fatal error. I think it is a bad sector or a bad block. Any more ideas? I think it is a waste of a good hard disk. Anyway thank you guy for the guidance.

rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif
*
Hmmm you have got quite an interesting situation here.

Sounds like bad sectors. Have you scanned your hard drives using drive testing utilities? Just remember not to boot from those drives.
FlameReaper
post Jan 10 2011, 10:41 AM

I lari portable on my dude
****
Senior Member
560 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: On my portable dude
QUOTE(GameSky @ Jan 9 2011, 06:06 PM)
audacious tempted to crash often on my side sweat.gif
*
If you're using versions lesser than 2.4.0, tendency is that it tends to crash quite often for me as well.

There's a repo for Audacious v2.4.0 and I upgraded my Audacious with it a while back, satisfied so far thumbup.gif

Only that its Last.fm scrobbler has a bug: it still sends songs that does not contain any metadata (at least the artist name and track title) to my Last.fm. So the result is I got so many (null) by (null) in my Last.fm list sweat.gif

This post has been edited by FlameReaper: Jan 10 2011, 10:55 AM
axxer
post Jan 10 2011, 10:46 AM

Banned
******
Validating
1,822 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Yesterday, 01:25 AM
didn't even sleep last night to fooling around with bash script.. now feels sleepy as h3ll yawn.gif yawn.gif
khakilang
post Jan 10 2011, 12:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
174 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(farkinid @ Jan 10 2011, 09:42 AM)
Hmmm you have got quite an interesting situation here.

Sounds like bad sectors. Have you scanned your hard drives using drive testing utilities? Just remember not to boot from those drives.
*
When I put into another computer to scan. It just goes blank when power up and hang. I even try Ubuntu 10.04 but no luck. It just hang on the splash screen forever. Anyway I will try again when I got time. Thanks again!


Added on January 10, 2011, 4:41 pmI just found out that the 2 unit of Dell PowerEdge is a server running on Linux. Is it possible that the hard disk can't be formatted because it is use as a server and there is some sort of write protection for Linux server?

This post has been edited by khakilang: Jan 10 2011, 04:41 PM
GameSky
post Jan 10 2011, 07:06 PM

Nyancat too much
*******
Senior Member
6,381 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: meow meow
any ppa for audacious that is on current version, 2.4.2?
currently "official" up to 2.4.0

64 Pages « < 22 23 24 25 26 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0298sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:49 PM