QUOTE(stringfellow @ Jan 30 2010, 02:52 AM)
So you're saying Apple's more interested in their bottom line than catering to the needs, however niche, of their customers?
Why yes of course. Apple is a commercial entity after all, and seriously speaking, I'm not under any illusion of them being that super nice. Are you under that illusion?
QUOTE(stringfellow @ Jan 30 2010, 02:52 AM)
As for the supply chain, does a position in the board of directors holds no benefit for them? Surely people would think that Apple would be more like to get first dibs and priority and the ease of securing parts compared to those only licensing BD technology. I'd be quick to get out of any position I hold I don't get special privileges over the products I preside over.
How exactly does the BoD position relate to the supply chain when the demand may not be that high? Also, keep in mind that unlike LED panels, or flash chips, or custom CPUs, etc, optical drives are still pretty much commodity items (although pricier than the rest of the optical drives). Looking at Apple's history, they're not gonna be remotely interested in the first dibs and the securing parts unless its something that they can hog all to themselves. Let's be realistic shall we, do you really want Apple to try to hog BD all to themselves?
QUOTE(stringfellow @ Jan 30 2010, 02:52 AM)
The OZ store only has two Alienware models, the M17x and the M15x. The rest are Dell's premium Adamo lineup which are not related to Alienware. Still simpler than Apple's 3 different models.
One's for gaming, and the other's for......? Either way, both impose premiums over their customers when buying their products. Still does not explain why Alienware offers BD and Apple doesn't. I don't see games being distributed on BD discs for the PC market. In fact, the creative professionals using their Macbooks are the loudest clamoring for BD inclusion so that they can include them in their work assignments (burning HD movie dailies and shipping them overnight for studio review on different side of the continent, for example).
Well, when Alienware has got Dell's supply chain backing them up, they do not have to swallow the supply chain costs on their own right?
And as for the creative professionals, dO they really burn to BD for such shipping? But seriously lar, have you seen the average size and length of such video chips that's usually worked on? Even the HD variants? Very seldom do you get these video clips being over 4GB in size. Its not an issue of DVD medium size limitations either, but get any bigger than that, and its gonna be real cumbersome to work with, unless its the final product that's being assembled.
Added on January 30, 2010, 11:00 amQUOTE(Only_Human @ Jan 30 2010, 10:42 AM)
Can i ask for 1 question 【Out of topict 】
if i buy IPAD in singpore , can i claim warranty in malaysia ?
Do APPLE suppport international warranty ?
yes they do.
Added on January 30, 2010, 11:01 amQUOTE(jiidaineko @ Jan 30 2010, 10:14 AM)
do bear in mind that BD adoption rate in msia do not represent the rest of the world. it is far from truth.
well, its as per the questions that I had asked:
- so what's the average adoption ratio worldwide anyways?
- and how many people feel the need to watch BD on their computers instead of on that big widescreen TV in the living room hooked up to some mega sound system?
Added on January 30, 2010, 11:06 amQUOTE(Voxe @ Jan 30 2010, 09:56 AM)
Wi-Fi is launched internationally on the same date, "60 days from now". US gets 3G models "90 days from now" but international 3G models depends on the negotiation of local telco which is expected around June to July.
I really think Apple have got it wrong with the iPad. They were thinking of a scaled up iPhone but what people wanted was a scaled down Mac. It would made more sense as netbooks run scaled down desktop OS.
Not really. As I've mentioned before, try to take an OS where the normal method of input is via keyboard/mouse or touchpad, and drop it into a tablet without a keyboard/touchpad that fully utilizes a touchscreen and you're in a world of pain indeed.
Your comparison on the netbooks is kinda flawed for that reason, because the netbook still uses the standard keyboard/touchpad interface.
Those people with computers with touchscreens running a normal desktop OS, how much do they make use of the touchscreen anyways for normal day to day use? Apart for dedicated uses where a dedicated app is run all the time?
I'll agree with you that ppl want a scaled down Mac instead of a scaled up iPhone, but I'l here highlighting the fact that its an easier transition (from the human interface perspective) to scale up from the iPhone interface than to scale down from a Desktop OS interface.
Added on January 30, 2010, 11:08 amQUOTE(cRazYee @ Jan 30 2010, 10:11 AM)
well, i do think they pick the right choice of OS, now it's massive transition period.
cuz mac os x is way too heavy OS for a thin piece device like this
i see where it can shine, in future but not with iphone os 3.2
see, the app in larger screen like games is not just enlarge, wasted the quality. The OS now could run Open GL to double the pixel, great potential coming.
Its not just about the hardware requirements of the OS. human interface design needs to be completely revamped for the entire desktop OS due to changes in the human input method.
QUOTE(cRazYee @ Jan 30 2010, 10:11 AM)
just check engadget's post on iPad SDK, it seem like alot thing is awaiting to bring out yet.
isn't that still under NDA? that's the reason why I've refrained from saying anything about the SDK at all.
This post has been edited by fyire: Jan 30 2010, 11:08 AM