Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hardware Apple iPad Discussion Thread | V1, Everything about iPad

views
     
rushmode
post Jan 28 2010, 01:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


i was following gizmodo live update last night and when it eventually unveiled it was like meh only.. it just a fat brother of iphone. HP iSlate is much better spec and design
rushmode
post Jan 28 2010, 02:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


the big letdown is no multitasking.. if this was intended to be an internet device tough luck on running safari with im client at the same time. unless backgrounder got ported to maxipad.

This post has been edited by rushmode: Jan 28 2010, 02:50 PM
rushmode
post Jan 29 2010, 01:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


regardless what many of us think how useless and outdated the iPad is.. it still gonna sell well amongst the fanboys and girls. they will always find out a reason to buy it.

let see how the perfomance when compares with HP Slate and newly announced MSI tablet later on.

oh fujitsu is claiming the rights for ipad name.. let just hope it would make apple change the silly name.
rushmode
post Jan 31 2010, 09:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


haven't seen so many bashing when apple launch a new product for so long. apple tv kinda disappointment but it was US only so not really affect the world.

more than a year long rumor build up, fantastic mockup, etc etc then after the release it so far from it was rumored and imagine making it a big disappointment even the fanboys has a hard time defending it.


rushmode
post Jan 31 2010, 09:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(stringfellow @ Jan 31 2010, 09:18 PM)
You weren't there during the Macbook Air debacle? I was the lone soldier around here, and I believe I still is when it comes to my preference to the Air compared to the normal Macbook/Pros.

Like I said, if I don't care, I won't be bothered complaining. All the more reason to b**** when your own money is involved.
*
i guess i miss it.. smile.gif though i got nothing on AIR because i dont really care about ultra portable.

hmm, i wish there's a place i cano moan about the xserve though tongue.gif
rushmode
post Feb 1 2010, 12:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


forum supposed to be a placed to discuss so no problem if we voiced out our opinions as long as its not insulting and degrading someone else.

i will never consider buying iPad because i don't see any use for it in my life. but maybe i will if they come with full fledged OSX. i do hope however the 2nd gen will be a better devices. i myself not an apple fan but working many years handling xserve making me somewhat attached to the brand.
rushmode
post Feb 2 2010, 10:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(calvin_ng @ Feb 2 2010, 09:28 AM)
well what I can say is GREED...

People give you apple you want Fuji Apple smile.gif smile.gif

As we can see A4 processor is quite strong and yes It can play games... Open GL games!!! you cant do that on a netbook hey wait Iphone and ipod can play open GL games too netbook cant either...

so it is simple... if iPad some how have OSX software say snow Lepord.. I bet iPad will not perform... not to mention the heat and processor power and graphic power... so expect the iPad to be Huge and bulky... we don't want that...

thats why iPhone OS was used... it is very light, power efficient, and easy to use... fast too...

it is like perfect combination....

we can want all the things in the world but realistically.. if iPad have a OSX software what next we can say is it is another tablet PC like Vista!!! yuck!!! have U tried Vista on a Tablet PC!!!..... hmmm.... I hate that!!!
*
beg to differ.. my wife netbook (mini 110) can play world of goo no problem. off course not on highest quality but playable at least. only that 10" screen is too damn small. there's also video on youtube showing netbook running a lot of games which i myself did not try. not sure if ipad A4 proc can handle them any better than intel 950 or nvidia ion..

iPad with OSX will be awesome. at least that what i believe. you can't compare vista tablet with OSX just like that. Vista sucks and not optimized for touch screen while Snow Leopard is the opposite.
rushmode
post Feb 2 2010, 11:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(cRazYee @ Feb 2 2010, 11:02 AM)
dont be stupid or sacristies, compare to half life or crysis, typical geek!
graphic engine is graphic engine, you can implement it in a mobile OS, that is the big deal! the quality is as part to PS2 as right now. You're pathetic
he replying to the post on how netbook cant play opengl games but A4 is powerful enough to play it. 3D games can be played on most netbook (even with GMA950 on low settings) so he's argument whether the A4 proc can play those games is valid because the other poster claimed it can.

QUOTE
by the hardware iPad has, load OSX will be probably pain in the ass
it mean for instant performance, instant boot up everything....
*
never meant OSX should be put in the iPad with the current spec.. just that apple can do much better job implement better hardware to iPad to run OSX but the refuse because probably:

1. want to get as high profit margin as possible with the price their suggested which is almost as high as the highest spec notebook (alienware gaming netbook)
2. keep it until the 2nd or 3rd gen so they can generate money that way because let face it.. apple WILL replace the 1st gen iPad in very short time ala iphone.


rushmode
post Feb 3 2010, 11:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(azxel @ Feb 3 2010, 10:21 AM)
1. I believe its based on the same architecture of the iPhone and most cellphones and PDAs... all of them can't multitask. I also believe that once its multi-tasking capable, it's gonna be hot... too hold to hold.

*
1. iPhone is capable on multitask if you jailbreak.. this proof it is possible to implemented from start but wonder why apple didnt do it. Android, webOS and WinMo (ugh!) all capable to multitask out of the box.

the bezel cant be help to be in that size because how else to hold without accidently pressing the screen if there was no/thin bezel.


rushmode
post Feb 3 2010, 03:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(jphlau @ Feb 3 2010, 01:19 PM)

Just imagine if Apple allow multitasking in iphone, we will have threads and threads of users complaining that their data has mysteriously disappear as apps are not closed properly.  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif

Then people will condemn apple again.
*
if there's multitasking and somehow data mysteriously disappear then it's apple fault for coming out with cacat software. other mobile os can do it why not the mighty apple? what's their agenda really?
rushmode
post Feb 4 2010, 05:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(calvin_ng @ Feb 4 2010, 05:17 PM)
so is USB that important??? apple prove it with the macbook air that usb is not quite really important..
*
ic.. that's why AIR is selling well... oh wait..

a true fanboy justify everything eh? tongue.gif

anyway, i would say ipad should look like JooJoo@crunchpad : LINK. That article said CSL will invest in it. Too bad it cant store anything and only run web apps.. if it come with let say moblin it would be nice.
rushmode
post Feb 5 2010, 01:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(fyire @ Feb 5 2010, 12:04 AM)
To tell the truth, I'm surprised that CSL would even dare to take on this seeing that there's a legal case pending on it.

My personal take on the joo joo pad's dimensions is that its pretty much a rather awkward form factor to wanna carry around all the time, and to be able to switch orientations easily. Not to mention as well, awkward to use in cramped environments.

The price of the joo joo is definitely one of the items that's gonna kill it though.
*
what's legal case?

amd i agree.. the suggested price for a mere web tablet will make it fail.
rushmode
post Feb 5 2010, 02:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


here's an article on iPad written by Paul Thurrott last week. He makes a good point and non biased at all.

http://www.winsupersite.com/alt/ipad_preview.asp

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0497sec    0.39    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:02 PM