QUOTE(bysquashy @ Apr 12 2009, 05:31 PM)
1. From technical point of view, it makes perfect sense to put a pico/femto base station in indoors. Indoors is meant to be covered by indoor BS.
2. Only selected (by MAC address) terminal can log on to the BS makes perfect sense too. Imagine competitor loading up the BS with rogue terminals. And to feed you with the truth, competitor go great lengths to sabotage each other.
3. I guess you've misinterpreted what's best effort. If your modem receives strong & good signal and the base station is not loaded. Definitely you'll get your "satisfactory" speed. They are not lying to you, the terminal that you have is able to perform that kind of speed.
I'm not affiliated with P1, I'm just sharing to you the technical side of your experience.
The rest have been addressed by the others, I'm here to address point number 3. 2. Only selected (by MAC address) terminal can log on to the BS makes perfect sense too. Imagine competitor loading up the BS with rogue terminals. And to feed you with the truth, competitor go great lengths to sabotage each other.
3. I guess you've misinterpreted what's best effort. If your modem receives strong & good signal and the base station is not loaded. Definitely you'll get your "satisfactory" speed. They are not lying to you, the terminal that you have is able to perform that kind of speed.
I'm not affiliated with P1, I'm just sharing to you the technical side of your experience.
Let me make this absolutely clear. See their Wiggy advertisement. "Fastest. Wireless. 10Mbps". What does that 10Mbps stands for? If you say it is an equipment limitation, then the specsheets I'm holding in my hand, that included inside the Wiggy modem box says 30Mbps. If you say that 10Mbps stands for their network limitation, IT NEVER HAD EVEN BEEN ABLE TO REACH THOSE SPEEDS at real-time situation! So what is this "10Mbps"? A nice number? A figure to delude consumers on how fast this service is, when in real application could not even satisfactorily reach half of that figure? What?
I am not technically blind. Look at my post history. I am not a noob who has just joined in LYN yesterday asking how to turn on my modem and what blinking lights I should look out for. What I am blind towards to is my relatively easy acceptance to new technology and my giving them a chance. Unfortunately my faith in them have been betrayed, both by the slanderous method of determining their download speed against advertised speed, and the numbers themselves. Unfortunately, both for me and them, I am not the type that stands by while I get swindled. My relative ease of acceptance of new technology does not mean I am easy to be conned, and I am not as willing to accept things as it is either.
For your Point #1 and 2, sure, any of the BB provider in there can pad and make their service look nice, they are entitled to do so with the competition and all. What I am concerned about is my BB provider of choice, chose to pad their numbers via slanderous ways, and claims ludicrous figures that will never be achievable in real life situation, in day-to-day basis. WE can talk technical jargon and specsheets and all other figures till the cow comes home, but the fact remain, they advertised 10, it never got to more than HALF of that. Is that the new definition and standard for "best effort basis" now? Is that acceptable to you? It is easy to take this issue light and trivially when you are not on the side where you have one foot inside the door and have signed the contract that is about to bind you for the next 12 months of your life, but what about the others who are either unaware of this seedy practice by P1, or those who are on the fence and undecided whether to subscribe or not?
If they are really out to capture the mindshare and the market with this service, you should not have padded the figures, or slander your speedtests this way. Or better still, BE HONEST and tell your customers the REAL LIFE speeds you would be getting instead of all the "nice and rosy 10" you can only get in ideal situations. IF you say the hall is not a conducive place to perform speed tests, guess what they can do? The activation takes only an hour. They can ask the new customer to test out their Wiggy modem with their own computer or provide a terminal at their collection counter (which is on ground floor, OUTSIDE of the exhibition hall BTW), and see the REAL SPEED, and see if the customer is willing to accept those speed, or moeny back INSTANTLY. That alone would have been credible and honest.
TO the rest who have signed up, go to the hall now, and try logging in. Their lies are IMMEDIATELY exposed when you do that.
To the rest who had been asking for reference download speeds, I got 1.9Mbps in AU2, 2Mbps in Jalan Ampang near Ampang Point, 2.3Mbps at infront of the taxi stand in Sungei Wang, 2.4Mbps at Berjaya Times Square, then I hopped on to the LRT and went to Kelana Jaya, went out the station to the bus waiting area and got 3Mbps. Got into the free shuttle to Ikano and got 4Mbps, went for a short run around the area, got back into the LRT and got out at Central Market for another paltry 2.5Mbps. I did not bother to go to Finnegan's the Sungei Wang numbers are already pathetic to begin with, so no point standing like an idiot infront of the pub to do the testing.
Now then, now that I have these figures to back up my claims, AND NONE OF THEM PROVIDES EVEN HALF OF THE CLAIMED SPEED, what does the P1 supporters here have to say about it? "It's raining?" "Unusual increase of logged-in users in the area I'm in?" or the most favourite excuse "Best effort basis only"?
Enough of all these excuses and bullshit. Those taking this lightly either did not even subscribe but rather like to sound clever finding excuses on behalf of P1, or drank so much of P1's Kool-Aid, that they take any available speed as "good enough". You disgust me.
Now that
This post has been edited by stringfellow: Apr 12 2009, 06:02 PM
Apr 12 2009, 05:58 PM

Quote
0.1055sec
0.34
6 queries
GZIP Disabled