The rest have been addressed by the others, I'm here to address point number 3.

Let me make this absolutely clear. See their Wiggy advertisement. "Fastest. Wireless. 10Mbps". What does that 10Mbps stands for? If you say it is an equipment limitation, then the specsheets I'm holding in my hand, that included inside the Wiggy modem box says 30Mbps. If you say that 10Mbps stands for their network limitation, IT NEVER HAD EVEN BEEN ABLE TO REACH THOSE SPEEDS at real-time situation! So what is this "10Mbps"? A nice number? A figure to delude consumers on how fast this service is, when in real application could not even satisfactorily reach half of that figure? What?

If that is your argument, then get this :- The Wiggy modem is rated 30Mbps download, not 10Mbps. So what is this "10" figure now? 30 with best effort at 10? 10 with best effort at ...god-knows-what-number? 10 is their network ceiling. I am not expecting 10. I am realistic. I am however expecting a figure which they can call a "REASONABLE" value. What that is, only P1 knows. What endusers like me know, is zilch, we are at the mercy of the provider. And yet still pay RM149 every month. Is that how things work now?

Broadband providers is a business. Say, will you want to make a flyer saying ' 10mbps connection?! But, you can only get this speed when your modem is beside the base station!'

There is no way they going to make such flyers.

P1 should do it the TMNet way on dealing 4mbps users. You see, not every area can apply for the 4mbps package that TMNet offered. This is the correct way of doing business. You know the limit of having 4mbps is only around the base station, why bother spread it out throughout the klang valley? Especially with numbers such as 10mbps.

I'm still on trial of the 6 months package given by them. Which is on 2.4mbps package. Out of 4 months of using it, let me over it with 10, only 4/10 throughout the 4 months i able to get connected (doesn't matter red, orange or green). I'm kind of sick with this results and self trying with the modem itself, i choose to just leave it on 24/7 with my desktop and p2p on. So whenever my p2p done downloading, i know that on that day my wimax is connected. But whenever i'm around the modem, rarely i have the chance to use it even to surf lowyat. Why? Because the modem love to blink.

This coming 14th gathering i hope TS can be there too. I want to listen to every facts and every single answers from the providers themselves. If there a reason behind this wiggy -bullshitness and the currently Always-No-Stable-Signal on wimax, i would gladly listen to them. If it not, the 6 months trial is my limit on using wimax. Streamyx is the best hope that i would love to gamble for longer period.

p/s: Damn. I just thought of getting wiggy.

then why the promoters in the exhibition Hall kept on pointing at theeir Dell laptops and that figure "8" on P1 speedtest and speedtest.net?

So is that how things work now? In fixed broadband it is hammered into our brains that you can only expect 70% of the promised speed, and now in mobile broadband it's between 0-100%?  God only knows why I still tolerate this!

Drop the 10. Stop misleading people. The REAL figure (3-4) by your claims, would have been more than fine, SHOULD THEY ADVERTISE IT AS SUCH. Why do they have to out in the figure 10, I wonder? End users do not need to know the network ceiling, or hardware limit if that is the case. What other excuse is there left then, other than to lure unsuspecting potential subscriber to your service, and slap them with "Best effort basis" later once you're in their net?

See, if they straight away put in 3-4Mbps, and claims it as such IN THE FIRST PLACE, you wouldn't even see me here ranting. In fact, I dont even visit this section of the forum, check my post history. My point is that 10, and how it is advertised as such.