Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
130 Pages « < 118 119 120 121 122 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Financial The Zest at Puchong Kinrara, Pls update the latest news ^_^

views
     
dEviLs
post Aug 3 2009, 08:00 AM

Three Suns~
*******
Senior Member
2,811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Selayang



QUOTE(sam0919 @ Aug 2 2009, 07:02 PM)
saw there is a new police station opening ceremony right beside the hup seng sdn bhd ..just few km away from the zest o.O
*
you sure that's opening ceremony ?
i tot that's the protest on the arrest of PKR leader? blink.gif
Hengjones
post Aug 3 2009, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(dEviLs @ Aug 3 2009, 08:00 AM)
you sure that's opening ceremony ?
i tot that's the protest on the arrest of PKR leader?  blink.gif
*
Yeah lor cos further down the road its a detention centre ( tempat tahanan PDRM) and the place was crowded due to the arrest of the ISA prostestor.

Unless he is saying that there ia police station near Hup Seng.
rogerdat
post Aug 3 2009, 01:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(yhoong @ Aug 1 2009, 12:43 AM)
I've receipt a letter from TZ's architect also. The letter stated "Replacemen of Parcel Layout Plan", it mention that 1 of the building plan was wrongly sent by them to the developer and resulting the same being wrongly inserted in the SPA.

But the letter stated also the new layout plan is as per the sale brochure. So, how do you going to NOT re-intial the new parcel layout plan?? What do you mean by "ccompensate"? How n what? You mean you still insist to have the divider/partition for your unit? hmm.gif

I think, if no extra charges incur and the unit's layout remain as per what I see when I purchase; I will agree with amendment to the SPA.
*
Hi,
I got the letter from the architect too, saying got some amendments. Will need to resign S&P. But, so far no lawyer has called me yet.
Does it mean, all of us have to resign the S&P? Mine is Type B, Block B.

About the loan, I'm taking PBB, 90% loan. But, have not received any letter from the bank/developer on the payment (interest, whatsoever).
Anyone with similar situation?
Thanks.
yhoong
post Aug 3 2009, 02:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(rogerdat @ Aug 3 2009, 01:43 PM)
Hi,
I got the letter from the architect too, saying got some amendments. Will need to resign S&P. But, so far no lawyer has called me yet.
Does it mean, all of us have to resign the S&P? Mine is Type B, Block B.

About the loan, I'm taking PBB, 90% loan. But, have not received any letter from the bank/developer on the payment (interest, whatsoever).
Anyone with similar situation?
Thanks.
*
Yes. I am in the exactly same situation like you. But we only need to "Re-initial" certain part of S&P, not resign the whole document.


AudiA6
post Aug 3 2009, 03:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(jehtwong @ Jul 31 2009, 11:00 AM)

yesterday received a letter fr TZ'z arkitek informed that, they will take away the divider/partition between the hall and dining area. And need to re-sign  the SNP due to change layout. FYI, my unit is type D Block B.

*
If they take away the partition then it is a good news for me. rclxms.gif

Frankly speaking, i hate that partition since it "eats up" the space.
Doraemon001
post Aug 3 2009, 07:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(AudiA6 @ Aug 3 2009, 03:33 PM)
If they take away the partition then it is a good news for me.  rclxms.gif

Frankly speaking, i hate that partition since it "eats up" the space.
*
I also received the letter... My is Type B also.

Can we all stand 2gether for not re-initial the amendment
and ask the developer to compensate us sumthing haha thumbup.gif



Backkom
post Aug 3 2009, 07:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
421 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(Doraemon001 @ Aug 3 2009, 07:02 PM)
I also received the letter... My is Type B also.

Can we all stand 2gether for not re-initial the amendment
and ask the developer to compensate us sumthing haha  thumbup.gif
*
Hmm we already initialed the "new" layout plan - it was already changed when we signed our S&P, this letter is just to formally inform us of the change.
brutus
post Aug 4 2009, 08:12 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,743 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Backkom @ Aug 3 2009, 07:38 PM)
Hmm we already initialed the "new" layout plan - it was already changed when we signed our S&P, this letter is just to formally inform us of the change.
*
which partition is it?

user posted image
Backkom
post Aug 4 2009, 09:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
421 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(brutus @ Aug 4 2009, 08:12 AM)
which partition is it?

user posted image
*
For type B, the original layout plan indicated some windows which we're not supposed to have since we're intermediate units.
Hence the windows were removed in the new layout plan, nothing to do with partition.
aquest
post Aug 4 2009, 09:48 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
662 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Backkom @ Aug 4 2009, 09:27 AM)
For type B, the original layout plan indicated some windows which we're not supposed to have since we're intermediate units.
in bloc c, type b #5 r corner units.

This post has been edited by aquest: Aug 4 2009, 09:49 AM
Backkom
post Aug 4 2009, 10:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
421 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(aquest @ Aug 4 2009, 09:48 AM)
in bloc c, type b #5 r corner units.
*
I see, mine is #7 - guess they gave us the #5 layout plan hence its wrong.
aquest
post Aug 4 2009, 11:56 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
662 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


specifically for block c type b #5 only
what's the point of having (almost) ceilling height windows when many kennot reach to touch it. believe the windows are fixed anyway. granted, its there just to allow light to penetrate but think about the difficulty of cleaning it. they might as well do away with these pseudo-windows. or lower the height and convert it into proper windows - with views too.

This post has been edited by aquest: Aug 4 2009, 12:04 PM
brutus
post Aug 4 2009, 12:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,743 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Backkom @ Aug 4 2009, 09:27 AM)
For type B, the original layout plan indicated some windows which we're not supposed to have since we're intermediate units.
Hence the windows were removed in the new layout plan, nothing to do with partition.
*
what/which window? blink.gif
you mean the S+P floor plan is slightly different from my posting?
Backkom
post Aug 4 2009, 01:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
421 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(brutus @ Aug 4 2009, 12:29 PM)
what/which window? blink.gif
you mean the S+P floor plan is slightly different from my posting?
*
To be frank - I have no idea where is the wrong window cause when I signed S&P, I already got the right layout plan tongue.gif
brutus
post Aug 4 2009, 02:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,743 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


then can any of the type B owners know where or what are the changes?
rogerdat
post Aug 4 2009, 03:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(Backkom @ Aug 3 2009, 07:38 PM)
Hmm we already initialed the "new" layout plan - it was already changed when we signed our S&P, this letter is just to formally inform us of the change.
*
Meaning, we don't need to do anything already (ie. reinitial certain docs, etc)? Hmm, cant really remember the lawyer told me about this when i was signing my s&p.
Doraemon001
post Aug 4 2009, 04:25 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(rogerdat @ Aug 4 2009, 03:14 PM)
Meaning, we don't need to do anything already (ie. reinitial certain docs, etc)? Hmm, cant really remember the lawyer told me about this when i was signing my s&p.
*
I need to re-initial the amended pages.. Cause my s&p was signed sumwhere at Mar..

The lawyer say will call me to re-initial the docs.. but now sound like stone drop inside sea hmm.gif

Sumore duno the lawyer oledi settle the drawndown or not.... they keep on saying stil proceeding whistling.gif

Anyway if the first drawndown became late... do we need to bare the late interest or the lawyer is to be blamed icon_question.gif


lms11
post Aug 4 2009, 04:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(Doraemon001 @ Aug 4 2009, 04:25 PM)
I need to re-initial the amended pages.. Cause my s&p was signed sumwhere at Mar..

The lawyer say will call me to re-initial the docs.. but now sound like stone drop inside sea hmm.gif

Sumore duno the lawyer oledi settle the drawndown or not.... they keep on saying stil proceeding  whistling.gif

Anyway if the first drawndown became late... do we need to bare the late interest or the lawyer is to be blamed icon_question.gif
*
As per what I know, developer will issue letter to bank to advise for money release, and the deadline will be 21 working days from the date of letter issued out.. If any parties' (lawyer, bank, government, or whoever) process slow down and causes any delay.. Yes, the late payment interest (daily calculated, as per S&P agreement) of 10 % per annum is to be bared by the purchase, which is.. US.

That's why, developer always advise us to choose for their bridging banks so 'minimise' the risk of late payment ....
Doraemon001
post Aug 4 2009, 05:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(lms11 @ Aug 4 2009, 04:39 PM)
As per what I know, developer will issue letter to bank to advise for money release, and the deadline will be 21 working days from the date of letter issued out.. If any parties' (lawyer, bank, government, or whoever) process slow down and causes any delay.. Yes, the late payment interest (daily calculated, as per S&P agreement) of 10 % per annum is to be bared by the purchase, which is.. US.

That's why, developer always advise us to choose for their bridging banks so 'minimise' the risk of late payment ....
*
Thx for ur info...

Than need to chase the lawyer like helllll to confirm the status doh.gif
rollover
post Aug 4 2009, 08:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
94 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Just wondering out loud. I've never really been involved in property investment in a big way but looking at Zest had me thinking. Is it still worth going for Zest for investment purposes? I know that there are very few units left so the good ones are pretty much already gone...



130 Pages « < 118 119 120 121 122 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0325sec    0.82    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 07:59 PM