enuff the bs.. i have 8800gt and 3870.. in terms of speed during playing game, using fraps, 3870 has lower fps, but without fraps, i dun think i can notice it..

image quality, 3870 manage to produce sharper n brighter color, i dunno how to describe it, but those who manage to compare both, plz do so before jump into any conclusion that the difference is small..

the different is noticeable.. definitely.. i like playing games, i want to have as many fps i want, eventhough between 30fps and 34fps we human may not notice it.. but i absolutely like image quality on the 3870.. when i return coolice's 3870 last time, i felt disappointed with image quality on my 8800gt ..

so since i want both speed and quality, i bought 3870 crossfire.. nuff said..
both card got their own advantage.. it's u to decide which iis more important to u, speed or quality..

dont need 3870 . even x1900 xt enough to notice the diffrent on IQ>

still wander why ppl dint see it ??

It's probably just a different gamma curve. That can be fixed in like 5 minutes. Especially with the dx10 cards, MS controls the spec very tightly, so there should be almost no visible difference to the real image quality comparing the cards in the same mode.

no more argue . let the read the review

http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=647&page=1

final word form the reveiw
Final Words


With the recent introduction of the Geforce 8 series, NVIDIA are finally able to offer cards worthy of consideration to those who deem image quality as paramount. Gone are the heavy driver optimisation; gone is hardware limited angle depedant anisotropic filtering; gone is a lack of support for HDR+AA. Since the 8600 launch a few weeks ago, there is little reason to go for a 7 series card unless you find a very good second hand bargain. But it must be said, in terms of image quality NVIDIA have done nothing more than catch up with ATI, and perhapos just nudge ahead a little (G80 AF quality can be better in some cases).

ATI's X1000 series are still a great choice as they lack none of the image quality features you would expect in 2007, you have HDR+AA support and HQAF. The only thing lacking is DX10 support

Speaking of DX10, we are no more than a week away from it's launch. With rumours of 24x AA (not full MSAA), who knows what sort of image quality advantage it may have over G80, my guess is probably very little, but we'll be sure to take a look in the next few weeks and update this article with R600.

read the full reveiw . b4 any comment .

if still got arguement . i have nothing to say .

well then u tell at last

which 1 have better IQ .

ATI OR Nvidia ? 

sry i am bit noobie to read review .

, guess i'm not using 8800GTX when comparing with HD2900XT

, there's one i want to ask... what about this? mouse-over 16x AF (ATi) and 16x AF (G80), did you notice anything? looks like, ATi's image crispier than nVidia

it looks ati hv better IQ then nvidia...

, guess i'm not using 8800GTX when comparing with HD2900XT

, there's one i want to ask... what about this? mouse-over 16x AF (ATi) and 16x AF (G80), did you notice anything? looks like, ATi's image crispier than nVidia

it looks ati hv better IQ then nvidia...

maybe for u . but some ppl still dint see it .or they refuse to see it ??

Just wonder which one better 1950xtx vs 3870 in terms of DirectX 9.0 game? Do you guys know?

Your texture problem in BF2 dah settle belom?