QUOTE(slash @ Aug 10 2007, 12:17 AM)
Not bad. For my pc, with stock I get around 3.7k for 3dmark06
Too low. At least for typical dual-core cpu should get 4.5k and above. Ultra Edition summore.Official LYN nVIDIA 8 series thread V2
|
|
 Aug 10 2007, 09:02 AM
|
 
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 09:07 AM
|
Senior Member
7,689 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: The Land of No Return
|
QUOTE(slash @ Aug 10 2007, 09:02 AM) depends on the user. u have to see it in their context. those with sidepanel fans, stock for them would mean just plugging the card in, closing the panel, and getting the readings. anyway shawty already listed out how he ran the card, and i listed my temps in comparison with his. So TomatomanzSeedlezz can just read and interpret the results accordingly. He said he's in the market for a card for his bro, and shawty is just trumpeting (albeit loudly) the pros of the colorful UE, which is kinda true and is a star buy for anyone looking for a midrange card. Which is why i said it really depends on how that particular person interprets what "stock" means..Anyway, 50c+ is indeed a nice temperature.Anyway, i am just helping to clarify the matter here. No harm done right..LOL.. About the trumpeting stuff, well, i am not going to go into that matter cause AFAIK, IF the GC is good, everyone would know even though no one is promoting it. Good stuff will be known all around and people here could judge wisely..For eg, even i am one that doesnt really support Colorful products are saying that the UE is good.  This post has been edited by akachester: Aug 10 2007, 09:07 AM |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 10:10 AM
|
Junior Member
171 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
WHY!?
It looks very fine when i played Lost Planet: Extreme Condition using DX9 WinXP(sp2) with maxed details.. but when i play it using DX10 Vista(x64) with the same setting... I CANT BELIEVE IT!!! I'm facing movement delay with a bit slow motion in the game.. Could it be DX10 problem or IT IS really my PC cant handle the graphic details.. !?  |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 10:41 AM
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(slash @ Aug 10 2007, 12:17 AM) Not bad. For my pc, with stock I get around 3.7k for 3dmark06 3k+ only.. i thought 5k+ for my setup very low already..3d05 around 10k+ my load temp 70+..  QUOTE(stevenlee @ Aug 10 2007, 07:27 AM) lloking at shawty benchmark, the 3dmark06 point is just 2k behind my 8800gts.. for sure the cpu will boost some more..i believe shawty proc contribute certain point to pull to score higher... i not very sure whether the cpu bottleneck my 8800gts point or not |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 11:05 AM
|
Senior Member
1,972 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley 
|
3DMark06: 8637 on my setup (sig)
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 11:30 AM
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(efisherman @ Aug 10 2007, 10:10 AM) WHY!? lol.. i posted a link show the DX10 crazy different performance.. say no to vista DX10 at the moment..It looks very fine when i played Lost Planet: Extreme Condition using DX9 WinXP(sp2) with maxed details.. but when i play it using DX10 Vista(x64) with the same setting... I CANT BELIEVE IT!!! I'm facing movement delay with a bit slow motion in the game.. Could it be DX10 problem or IT IS really my PC cant handle the graphic details.. !? driver issue should be.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 11:38 AM
|
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
but will the 8600 UE to outperform 7900GS/X1950Pro in most dx9 games? Thats the thing i want to know the most, although 3dmarks score is favor to 8600, but that doesn't mean its superior than 7900s in gaming
 as for dx10 games, heck everything is so speculated |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 11:50 AM
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
what's gpu ur using..
i got 30+ fps in most games @ 1280x1024 in full details.. atleast better than my 7600gt on AA.. |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 01:56 PM
|
|
Junior Member
171 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Aug 10 2007, 11:30 AM) lol.. i posted a link show the DX10 crazy different performance.. say no to vista DX10 at the moment.. IC...driver issue should be.. Its driver issues... Thanks for clarification.. So is there Any related news that Microsoft corp. aware of this issue? Hope this issue can be resolved before the launch of Crytek Crysis game.. Since it says DX10 is a must.. |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 06:41 PM
|
Senior Member
1,081 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Aug 10 2007, 10:41 AM) 3k+ only.. i thought 5k+ for my setup very low already.. well, i did the 3dmark06 again, this time i got 4.7k. SM2.0 score 1903, HDR score 1836, cpu score 1941 (total lose to shawty's 3380)3d05 around 10k+ my load temp 70+.. for sure the cpu will boost some more.. |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 07:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
For sure total lost to Shawty's mark coz u use AMD X2. If u used c2d @ 3.8 GHz u will get similar score to him.
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 07:13 PM
|
All Stars
10,530 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley
|
@slash
run 05 la... 06 is CPU dependant. 05 is a better judge for the GC as the CPU doesnt affect the scores as much as 06. |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 08:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,081 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
dont have the installation. anyway just compare the sm and hdr scores lo. disregard the cpu scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 11:06 PM
|
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang-
|
QUOTE(LExus65 @ Aug 10 2007, 08:31 AM) 3dmark 05 and 06 are not that CPU dependent if not mistaken, but it's agood score there............. btw shawty have u tested it on games yet ?? FPS is much more convincing ............ bro,btw uncle ho, no offense...... not all 8600GT can mod with extra PCI power input i guess, especially like this colourful 1 using there own PCB, lots of component are missing for the extra power input 05 is not cpu dependent... but 06 is cpu dependent... some ppl even say 07 is favour quad core somemore what i would say 05 is best benchmark to compare |
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 11:27 PM
|
Junior Member
80 posts Joined: Jul 2007
|
I would like to ask, is there an 8600 GTS graphics card that has more than 256Mb DDR3 memory, such as 320Mb ? Also, which brand assures top performance (Googling around, its hard to make a solid comparison), XFX, MSI, Asus, Galaxy ? I am seriously thinking of purchasing an 8600 GTS GPU for my Pentium D 3.2GHz machine with 2Gb memory.
|
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 12:08 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,081 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
colorful 8600gt UE. shawty's bulk. haha. promoting this card again. If you dont mind waiting for the card to ship out
|
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 12:26 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
QUOTE(Games For Windows @ Aug 10 2007, 11:27 PM) I would like to ask, is there an 8600 GTS graphics card that has more than 256Mb DDR3 memory, such as 320Mb ? Also, which brand assures top performance (Googling around, its hard to make a solid comparison), XFX, MSI, Asus, Galaxy ? I am seriously thinking of purchasing an 8600 GTS GPU for my Pentium D 3.2GHz machine with 2Gb memory. There is 512MB version from Palit Super edition, but no where can find in LYP.  |
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 12:49 AM
|
Junior Member
109 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: Where Everyone Lives
|
never heard of 512mb one.How much would it be for a new card price?
|
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 12:58 AM
|
|
Junior Member
80 posts Joined: Jul 2007
|
  I heard XFX's line of 8600 GTS offer exceptional performance at a slightly higher price. |
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 12:59 AM
|
Junior Member
453 posts Joined: Apr 2007
|
erm, if you thinking of getting the 8600gts but with more MB, i suggest better get the cheapest 8800gts.. you'll get a super high performance difference, rather than getting a 512mb 8600gts..
in case you don't know, the MB only helps you by utilising bigger resolution.. if your monitor is less than 20 inch, 256MB is more than enough.... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0260sec
 0.77
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 08:30 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.