QUOTE(badguy93 @ Mar 6 2019, 04:15 PM)
Once current salary is disclosed, there is no trust between employer and candidate. The unfairness will continue to press. Since the employer is looking for potential candidate and willing to offer the remuneration package, then why ask to disclose? You get my point here?
If the applicant refuse to show his payslip in order to ask for higher package, then go evaluate the candidate skill. It is no use to gauge the candidate just for that purpose.
Like I have mentioned in above scenario, a working experience vs skill set vs bad company performance affected loyalty employee.
If you are the boss, who you want to hire to bring revenue to your company? HR is greedy, so they are evil lol. In your very own perspective, which is better?
Yes, you got the point. Talk about trust between the company and the candidate. Why am I being shortlisted? That is because the company see me fit into their role. And the company is offering the package for that role, so the company should go with that package, otherwise don't offer.
Under PDPA section 6, it is illegal trying to gauge the private and confidential data without the candidate consent. Look, talk about unfair and trust, when a company request you to disclose your current salary, meaning they have no confidence and no sincere to the new candidate. If that is the case then don't offer such "attractive package" initially.
A proper hire process should evaluate the candidate performance and skills, then from there, a skilled interviewer should evaluate the candidate skill set by test given during interview instead gauge current pay slip. The past salary has nothing to do / no relationship at all to the new company. Same goes to your old company, no relationship between 2.
Your case could be an exception as you are referring to your previous bad company and you attended an interview and you got a go offer without showing your last pay but told them your performance, if I read you correctly. Is this what you are trying to tell us here ? How many companies out there in Malaysia practice this by not having the need to show pay slip just make an offer base on interviews ? Or, this is just an one time off scenario ?If the applicant refuse to show his payslip in order to ask for higher package, then go evaluate the candidate skill. It is no use to gauge the candidate just for that purpose.
Like I have mentioned in above scenario, a working experience vs skill set vs bad company performance affected loyalty employee.
If you are the boss, who you want to hire to bring revenue to your company? HR is greedy, so they are evil lol. In your very own perspective, which is better?
Yes, you got the point. Talk about trust between the company and the candidate. Why am I being shortlisted? That is because the company see me fit into their role. And the company is offering the package for that role, so the company should go with that package, otherwise don't offer.
Under PDPA section 6, it is illegal trying to gauge the private and confidential data without the candidate consent. Look, talk about unfair and trust, when a company request you to disclose your current salary, meaning they have no confidence and no sincere to the new candidate. If that is the case then don't offer such "attractive package" initially.
A proper hire process should evaluate the candidate performance and skills, then from there, a skilled interviewer should evaluate the candidate skill set by test given during interview instead gauge current pay slip. The past salary has nothing to do / no relationship at all to the new company. Same goes to your old company, no relationship between 2.
Mar 6 2019, 03:33 PM

Quote
0.0309sec
0.34
6 queries
GZIP Disabled