Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
131 Pages « < 20 21 22 23 24 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits

views
     
DarkForce
post Dec 13 2006, 02:58 PM

short thinking syndrom
****
Senior Member
544 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: DarkForce@LYN.net
tat the skill i always use... no aircond bro...
yehlai
post Dec 13 2006, 04:58 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N
QUOTE(siauann @ Dec 12 2006, 11:13 PM)
kenot go higher?  sweat.gif not a good proc or ur mobo is limting u  sweat.gif
mine can go up to 450x7..more than need very high vcore wic is not good for 24/7 usage i believe...tats y i play wif 400x7 + undervolt wif current setup tongue.gif
*
it should be proc tht bottleneck my oc..
Not all E6300 can reach 450fsb, as u can see from lyn or foreign o'c board.
How much vCore u feed to hit 450 ?? Agree with u, its really not good for 24/7.. last time i also play undervolt.

QUOTE(Evogenix @ Dec 12 2006, 11:12 PM)
yes, got a large percentage can reach 3.5GHz above with e6400
But, if wanna get e6400, rather go for e6600 with the extra caches.

Every cent that spent on that extra caches are worth it.

Evogenix
*
Yes... E6600 is better. But i think its becoz of higher multiplier for oc. The extra 2mb caches only make less than 5% of performance difference.
I cant afford E6600 sweat.gif can only buy E6400 after i sold my E6300. I just need top up RM50 only sweat.gif

This post has been edited by yehlai: Dec 13 2006, 05:23 PM
yehlai
post Dec 13 2006, 05:02 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N
-Sorry. Double Post- notworthy.gif
Merry Xmas

This post has been edited by yehlai: Dec 13 2006, 05:05 PM
siauann
post Dec 13 2006, 05:55 PM

Music-Movies-Coffee
*******
Senior Member
3,375 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: MeeRee
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 13 2006, 04:58 PM)
it should be proc tht bottleneck my oc..
Not all E6300 can reach 450fsb, as u can see from lyn or foreign o'c board.
How much vCore u feed to hit 450 ?? Agree with u, its really not good for 24/7.. last time i also play undervolt.
Yes... E6600 is better. But i think its becoz of higher multiplier for oc. The extra 2mb caches only make less than 5% of performance difference.
I cant afford E6600  sweat.gif can only buy E6400 after i sold my E6300. I just need top up RM50 only  sweat.gif
*
if im not mistaken i need to run vcore of 1.4v to stabilize the 450x7 oc sweat.gif

well if u says the E6600 will only brings 5% difference in performance then how much u think an E6400 can makes compares wif an E6300 cool2.gif
yehlai
post Dec 13 2006, 06:29 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N
im not sure.. but i saw many E6400 can easily hit 3.5Ghz or more.
If only compare the clock speed, then E6400 sure can reach higher clock.
Frankly said, performance diff between E6600>E6400>E6300 can see from Super Pi is 1-2 second different.. maybe big difference in benchmark (can say small too)but cant feel diff in normal use. Anyway its quite subjective too. sweat.gif

Price/perf ratio i think E6400>E6300 if can buy from Bulk.

deric88
post Dec 13 2006, 06:47 PM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
how did the guys from hardwarezone did it?
user posted image
look at the voltage and FSB

This post has been edited by deric88: Dec 13 2006, 06:48 PM
mikelanding
post Dec 13 2006, 07:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,865 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 13 2006, 06:47 PM)
how did the guys from hardwarezone did it?
user posted image
look at the voltage and FSB
*

Dont get fool by the Vcore reported in CPU-Z...is a bug...The actual Vcore maybe more than wat reported....
basSist
post Dec 13 2006, 07:05 PM

Don't look at my stars
*******
Senior Member
3,567 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Paradise
QUOTE(mikelanding @ Dec 13 2006, 07:03 PM)
Dont get fool by the Vcore reported in CPU-Z...is a bug...The actual Vcore maybe more than wat reported....
*
yes. when the vcore up till 1.5v the cpuz will show 1.2v only iianm.
deric88
post Dec 13 2006, 07:08 PM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
ahh silly me....
yehlai
post Dec 13 2006, 07:23 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N
Dont need to set vCore to the lowest point.. as long as your core temp is below 55C during o'c then should be quite good d...
I undervolt becoz dont wanna stress my proc too much, not becos of trying to achive lower core temp.
deric88
post Dec 13 2006, 07:47 PM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
55C load or idle?
yehlai
post Dec 13 2006, 08:00 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N
idle.. if load/gamming should be 56-57C for my porc @ 3Ghz
deric88
post Dec 13 2006, 08:17 PM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 13 2006, 08:00 PM)
idle.. if load/gamming should be 56-57C for my porc @ 3Ghz
*
what cooler? waz your vcore?, my load if i set to 3ghz touch 60+....
basSist
post Dec 13 2006, 10:22 PM

Don't look at my stars
*******
Senior Member
3,567 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Paradise
my vcore 1.375v in bios @ 3.2Ghz gaming around 56-57 too wink.gif
DaRkSyThE
post Dec 13 2006, 10:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
4,809 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(basSist @ Dec 13 2006, 10:22 PM)
my vcore 1.375v in bios @ 3.2Ghz gaming around 56-57 too wink.gif
*
me too. 46 with air cond biggrin.gif cool2.gif
flatfinger
post Dec 13 2006, 11:06 PM

Totally Retired
*****
Senior Member
925 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: depan lcd...dalam bilik..sekitar cyberjaya...
mine 1.35v bios...windows reads 1.328v @ 3.2ghz...load gaming around 46-49 watercooler..
basSist
post Dec 13 2006, 11:23 PM

Don't look at my stars
*******
Senior Member
3,567 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Paradise
QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Dec 13 2006, 10:25 PM)
me too. 46 with air cond biggrin.gif  cool2.gif
*
air cond~ drool.gif the lowest temp i can get during rainy mid night is 54c (orthos), gaming should be 50-52c laugh.gif

QUOTE(flatfinger @ Dec 13 2006, 11:06 PM)
mine 1.35v bios...windows reads 1.328v @ 3.2ghz...load gaming around 46-49 watercooler..
*
watercooler + air cond should be perfect >.<
siauann
post Dec 13 2006, 11:36 PM

Music-Movies-Coffee
*******
Senior Member
3,375 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: MeeRee
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 13 2006, 08:00 PM)
idle.. if load/gamming should be 56-57C for my porc @ 3Ghz
*
idle @ 55ºc and load only 1-2ºc difference? hard to believe shocking.gif
DaRkSyThE
post Dec 14 2006, 12:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
4,809 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(siauann @ Dec 13 2006, 11:36 PM)
idle @ 55ºc and load only 1-2ºc difference? hard to believe  shocking.gif
*
depends on what game.he could be playing pacman biggrin.gif
most games dont optimize the dual core. so the temp increase aint that much
deric88
post Dec 14 2006, 01:24 AM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Dec 14 2006, 12:48 AM)
depends on what game.he could be playing pacman biggrin.gif
most games dont optimize the dual core. so the temp increase aint that much
*
agreed, do folding, orthos for load temp
« Next Oldest · Overclockers United · Next Newest »
 

131 Pages « < 20 21 22 23 24 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0307sec    0.24    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 03:06 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.