Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
|
gengstapo
|
 Dec 12 2006, 08:16 AM
|
|
QUOTE(csechuan @ Dec 11 2006, 09:36 PM) no la...my system stable la 23hrs dual prime d.... i tested it b4 i bought my x-fi... after x-fi oni got such prob....it mentioned in thread b4...they said bios or something problem...but i forget how to fix it....any1? its becoz the conflict of x-fi same here, u need to upgrade ur BIOS to the F7 or F8i to fix the problem  |
|
|
|
|
|
DaRkSyThE
|
Dec 12 2006, 11:28 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(gmail @ Dec 11 2006, 11:09 PM) its missing one more heatsink. on the top right of the picture.  performance shud be the same/ almost the same as the DS3 |
|
|
|
|
|
flatfinger
|
 Dec 12 2006, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
ok guys....i betray AMD already  ...sold my opty 165 n get e64...joining the dark force of intel now here my OC screeny @3.4Ghz, 1.45v bios vcore, 1.42v windows read priming 6 hours stable  ...still going..  This post has been edited by flatfinger: Dec 12 2006, 01:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 12 2006, 01:49 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(flatfinger @ Dec 12 2006, 12:58 PM) ok guys....i betray AMD already ...sold my opty 165 n get e64...joining the dark force of intel now here my OC screeny @3.4Ghz, 1.45v bios vcore, 1.42v windows read priming 6 hours stable ...still going.. woah 1.45v only 57c what cooler u use kah? air-coned? |
|
|
|
|
|
flatfinger
|
Dec 12 2006, 01:50 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(basSist @ Dec 12 2006, 01:49 PM) woah 1.45v only 57c what cooler u use kah? air-coned? no la...im using wc..heheheh  |
|
|
|
|
|
yehlai
|
Dec 12 2006, 01:59 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(basSist @ Dec 12 2006, 01:49 PM) woah 1.45v only 57c what cooler u use kah? air-coned? Core temp's reading temp is 5-6C lower than TAT... |
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 12 2006, 02:11 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(flatfinger @ Dec 12 2006, 01:50 PM) no la...im using wc..heheheh haha no wonder  QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 12 2006, 01:59 PM) Core temp's reading temp is 5-6C lower than TAT... is it? i dont think so. maybe u use TAT to stress then the temp is higher than the temp stressed by orthos/prime95/sp2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
flatfinger
|
Dec 12 2006, 02:39 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 12 2006, 01:59 PM) Core temp's reading temp is 5-6C lower than TAT... QUOTE(basSist @ Dec 12 2006, 02:11 PM) haha no wonder is it? i dont think so. maybe u use TAT to stress then the temp is higher than the temp stressed by orthos/prime95/sp2004 hehheh...i think using prime orthos is better...run test : Blend - stress CPU and Ram..  This post has been edited by flatfinger: Dec 12 2006, 02:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
yehlai
|
Dec 12 2006, 03:06 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(flatfinger @ Dec 12 2006, 02:39 PM) hehheh...i think using prime orthos is better...run test : Blend - stress CPU and Ram.. core temp and TAT temp reading is different. Becoz core temp's reading always lower 5-6 degree. Just open another TAT and compare yourself. TAT is more accurate becoz TAT is design by Intel itself for Intel proc and mobo. |
|
|
|
|
|
flatfinger
|
Dec 12 2006, 03:12 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 12 2006, 03:06 PM) core temp and TAT temp reading is different. Becoz core temp's reading always lower 5-6 degree. Just open another TAT and compare yourself. TAT is more accurate becoz TAT is design by Intel itself for Intel proc and mobo. the thing is i hate intel product... |
|
|
|
|
|
yehlai
|
Dec 12 2006, 03:26 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(flatfinger @ Dec 12 2006, 03:12 PM) the thing is i hate intel product... oh ya thts great.. u can throw yr E6400 to my place then, i can take care of it. This post has been edited by yehlai: Dec 12 2006, 03:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Evogenix
|
Dec 12 2006, 03:31 PM
|
|
|
Announcement to ds3 user, F8j BIOS is out Credit to bingo13 @ XShttp://rapidshare.com/files/7130218/965pds3f8janandtech.zipEvogenix |
|
|
|
|
|
deric88
|
Dec 12 2006, 03:32 PM
|
|
|
waz the changes made?
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 12 2006, 04:11 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 12 2006, 03:06 PM) core temp and TAT temp reading is different. Becoz core temp's reading always lower 5-6 degree. Just open another TAT and compare yourself. TAT is more accurate becoz TAT is design by Intel itself for Intel proc and mobo. btw i am using everest and TAT. both give me accurate readings  not using core temp anyway QUOTE(Evogenix @ Dec 12 2006, 03:31 PM) Announcement to ds3 user, F8j BIOS is out Credit to bingo13 @ XShttp://rapidshare.com/files/7130218/965pds3f8janandtech.zipEvogenix thanks. change log pls |
|
|
|
|
|
yehlai
|
Dec 12 2006, 04:31 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(flatfinger @ Dec 12 2006, 03:28 PM) hey dont edit post dude i heavent save yr reply for future proof  |
|
|
|
|
|
Evogenix
|
Dec 12 2006, 04:45 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 12 2006, 03:32 PM) I'm using it right now. din notice any changes/ oc-ing improvment from previous F8i ps : sum1 just killed his board on this F8j BIOS, use it on your own riskEvogenix This post has been edited by Evogenix: Dec 12 2006, 04:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Dec 12 2006, 05:17 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Evogenix @ Dec 12 2006, 04:45 PM) I'm using it right now. din notice any changes/ oc-ing improvment from previous F8i ps : sum1 just killed his board on this F8j BIOS, use it on your own riskEvogenix nice changelog there.. will try it when it get home |
|
|
|
|
|
deric88
|
Dec 12 2006, 05:26 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(gengstapo @ Dec 12 2006, 05:17 PM) nice changelog there.. will try it when it get home if i were you, i rather wait release from gigabyte website then risking to kill my own mobo without knowing what this do |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Dec 12 2006, 05:30 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 12 2006, 05:26 PM) if i were you, i rather wait release from gigabyte website then risking to kill my own mobo without knowing what this do nahh.. even currently im using F8i wanna c if i able to raise my speed |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0274sec
0.50
6 queries
GZIP Disabled