Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 03:48 PM
|
|
i i just got my c2d rig yesterday. Try to oc it but cant really catch the idea. need some help wink.gif
E6400 - 400 x 8
fsb +0.1 gmch +0.1
vcore 1.35v
Run two sp2004: one in small.. test CPU, one in large.. test RAM
CPU - no problem; RAM - Failed in 46 seconds.
Temperature: 57~59(idle), 77~78(prime)
Any idea and suggestion guys?
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 04:02 PM
|
|
i am using Mushkin 1GB PC800 5-5-5-18 (from cpu-z). Yes i am using 1:1 at DDR800. ok i will try Orthos later
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 04:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Nov 10 2006, 03:52 PM) Can you specify what memory and timing are you running, try Orthos instead.... I assumed you are using 1:1 at DDR800, try to increase a notch of Vdimm and retry Orthos Large FFT. Good luck   Hm.. any idea?
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 05:53 PM
|
|
QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Nov 10 2006, 05:49 PM) You don't have to run two copies of Orthos, just run one copy is good. What is the Vdimm applied? Try tighter timing instead.... Probably 4.0-4-4-12 at 2.0v or 2.1v oh.. ok  sory still newbie. but still failedin one copy. Vdimm +0.1v. ok will try later  QUOTE(siauann @ Nov 10 2006, 05:51 PM) hw much vdimm u feed? Vdimm +0.1 means.. 1.9v? default at 1.8v right? This post has been edited by basSist: Nov 10 2006, 05:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 06:26 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mikelanding @ Nov 10 2006, 06:13 PM) Try increase yr Vdimm =+0.3 and Vcore to around 1.375 or even 1.4..Remember to lock yr PCI freq to 100MHz ....Use TAT to measure CPU temp... ok thanks  do i need to increse the pci-e, fsb and mgch overvoltage things?
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 06:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mikelanding @ Nov 10 2006, 06:29 PM) U had to try yr own on that...I suggest leave all to normal first...changing too much variable will confuse U more...  P/S: Interested to know yr temp @ TAT...do let us know ya? ok. i am now trying to prime it at all default including the cpu and ram. see whether orthos fails o not. this is the tat's temp. Orthos still running now. phew~
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 10:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mikelanding @ Nov 10 2006, 06:39 PM) Wow...hot hot .  ...66C at Default vcore =1.325v? if yes, U might need to do something on the stock HSF... yeah.. i think something wrong on my HSF. How u all apply the thermal paste on the processor? maybe my method was wrong..
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 10:10 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MaGicDust @ Nov 10 2006, 10:03 PM) Yeah, that's very hot... Maybe you should try to get the temperature right first before trying to push the proc... I would use the TAT's function to load both the cores cause they produce a higher max temperature compared to running 2 Super Pi or Prime Make sure you apply enough to cover the entire processor's heat sink, evenly spreaded out with a card, the coating should be evenly distributed with a thickness of probably 0.5-1mm. Thermal paste often require up to 1-3days to 'dry up' to reach maximum performance... i am running the tat so stress both core. both shows highest 72c at default. i think my method applying the thermal paste was wrong guah. if have a pic of how to applyin the tp would be nice  and idle at stock is about 48-50c This post has been edited by basSist: Nov 10 2006, 10:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 10 2006, 10:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mikelanding @ Nov 10 2006, 10:17 PM) got 2 methods i know off: 1) AS5 official guide which I normally use AS5 application guide2) Other method is "In the center of the cpu heatspreader, put a drop of thermal paste the size of one bb. Then just squish it down with the heatsink, lock your heatsink in" GL i used the 2nd method. but still got high temperature
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 11 2006, 03:07 AM
|
|
QUOTE(gengstapo @ Nov 10 2006, 10:16 PM) hot ka?? i dont thinks so. on air cooling it should be normal same as mine here :  but i am running in default clock speed and default vcore.. QUOTE(ddww @ Nov 10 2006, 10:50 PM) 66 is normal for the stock HSF because u r running it @ full load. really? buthat i am just running at the default clock speed and vcore.. not o/c yet. if o/c till 3.2Ghz (400x8) sure around 79-81c  ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 11 2006, 02:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ddww @ Nov 11 2006, 04:02 AM) but then u r using stock HSF ler.. i didnt expect running stock HSF at 3.2Ghz would get so high temperature QUOTE(pierreye @ Nov 11 2006, 12:34 PM) My rig quite similar to your setup, basSist. I'm using Mushkin 1Gb x 2 at 800Mhz 1:1 5-5-5-12 at 2.1v. Currently running at 3.2Ghz running on AlphaCool water cooling at stock voltage. CoreTemp idle at 42 degrees load at 50 degrees yeah similar buthen u got water cooler >.< i got about 77-78c running at 3.2Ghz.. somemore not stable with Orthos priming. btw i am using F7 bios. This post has been edited by basSist: Nov 11 2006, 02:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 12 2006, 04:22 PM
|
|
QUOTE(hersa_wex @ Nov 12 2006, 10:03 AM) I am using Intel Stock Cooling and same speed with yours (400x8) . Idle 55-57c. vCore 1.4, the rest +0.2. Very loose timing. Using Kingston valueram. Full load with orthos 67c. If wanna go to (450x8) then vCore need around 1.5. Full load will be 82c. Using Proc E6400 and DS3 @ F7 bios. Intel Stock Cooling. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Did u orthos fail when running 400x8 with 1.4 vcore? i got more higher temperature than urs
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 12 2006, 04:44 PM
|
|
QUOTE(hersa_wex @ Nov 12 2006, 04:36 PM) That setting was a stable setting. Orthos 18hrs without fail. maybe i should try vcore 1.4v coz i havent tried that using 400x8
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Nov 13 2006, 04:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Diademz @ Nov 13 2006, 10:37 AM) using a e6400 @ 3.2GHz @ 1.25V Vcore. woah.. 1.25v vcore can run at 3.2Ghz? mine 1.30v vcore not stable also (restart after open 2 folding programs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 5 2006, 02:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 5 2006, 01:48 PM) hmm guess i was wrong..... i thought tht wasn't it, prime95....it doesn't look like the one with the big GO which u all use... it does show the big GO for Orthos
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 5 2006, 02:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 5 2006, 02:28 PM) okay, then i need a guide on using this software [attachmentid=162773] ops. i misunderstood. i meant got the big GO for ORTHOS but i think prime95 dont have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 5 2006, 04:14 PM
|
|
QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 5 2006, 03:11 PM) my e6300@ 2.4Ghz 63'C idle 80'C full load from TAT but EasyTune shows 53'C idle 70'C full load, which one more accurate... mean time i better change back to stock speed, anyway to lower temperature using stock fan? where can i get orthos? yeah u need to get a nice HSF + TIM, and the way u put thermal paste do affect the temp too. i got 58c while full load orthos but after i reapply the thermal paste due to some technical problem my full load become 62c.. btw using coretemp, tat and everest should be accurate for the temp reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 6 2006, 01:16 AM
|
|
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 5 2006, 06:44 PM) @basSist Can ur E6400 go beyond 400 FSB?? how much vCore needed?? never try beyong 400fsb coz my 3.2ghz not stable enough (1.3625v in bios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 6 2006, 01:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(siauann @ Dec 6 2006, 10:09 AM) wow...very nice.... i run mine 400 x 7 @ 1.25v now..set in bios..stil priming orthos to test stability... cpu-z shows 1.248v  but whn priming orthos it shows 1.232v fluctuation?  1.25v.. why u all can lower the vcore so much. mine was doing 1.375v in bios (1.344v in cpuz) and it only stable at that level. 1.356v in bios sure got erros after 5 minutes in orthos >.< QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 6 2006, 11:42 AM) eh.. E6400 not stable when >400fsb? I am planning to upgrade to E6400 now, hope can get higher OC. Now my E6300 can only hit 440fsb. But im not satisfy  . I tot E6400 can easily hit 400fsb.. i sold my E6300 alrdy  hehe i just need 400x8=3.2ghz in daily usage. dont need anything higher so i just try to stable it first at this level. when i free sure will try to oc beyong that
|
|
|
|
|
|
basSist
|
Dec 6 2006, 01:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(yehlai @ Dec 6 2006, 01:32 PM) Yes i know E6600 is better bocoz hv higher multiplier.. but i dont need 4GHz clock speed for now. Previously my E6300 can hardly reach 3Ghz, its alrdy sufficient for normal use. Really fast enough. Reason i wanna get E6400 is just wanna get a proc tht can easily hit > 3.2GHz, thts all.. nothing more. Moreover, i only need to op up RM60 to get a E6400 after i sell my E6300 with RM600. If E6600 i nid top up few hundreds.. sakit hati just Oc for fun  and like goldfries said, Better proc is good for benchie, but normal use E6300 got not much different with E6600. yea u got the point u wont feel the different while using 2mb and 4mb cache in real life. it is all about benchie. just get whatever u need then ok d
|
|
|
|
|