guys... need ur opinion here..
is this c2d batch for E6300 [ L629A291 ] is good or not??
btw.. thank all
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 12:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: DarkForce@LYN.net |
guys... need ur opinion here..
is this c2d batch for E6300 [ L629A291 ] is good or not?? btw.. thank all |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 01:08 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
139 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
Hi guys!! I am a noob to oc and also here. This is the 1st time i am ocing anything in my life
I have a e6300 n gigabyte 965p ds3 mobo. Currently i am using intel factory fan and disabling cpu fan control feature (is this ok to do bros?). I am only brave enough to set the fsb to 320, might increase it again after changing to newer cpu fan. The current temp if idle for the cpu is 46C and can reach 58C when using TAT. Is this temp im getting is ideal or is it too hot? I afraid if too hot will burn the e6300 I also have change the voltage from normal to 1.1375v..Will this setting affect the e6300? So sorry for to many questions ![]() |
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 12:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 01:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,539 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N |
He running 2.24GHz.. only oc a bit.
|
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 01:16 PM
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
maybe i should follow u guys
just scared burn in then my proc burns out |
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 01:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,539 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N |
QUOTE(remysix @ Dec 7 2006, 11:28 PM) QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Dec 8 2006, 01:16 PM) If you need to crash then crash and burn.. You're not alone This post has been edited by yehlai: Dec 8 2006, 02:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 04:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,464 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
58C load on 2.24 undervolt? that's hot, check hour hsf make sure got fix properly....
mine 2.8 1.25volt load also 60C.... |
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 04:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 06:11 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
139 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Dec 8 2006, 12:59 PM) yup, currently running under that vcore value. Been running for nearly 24 hrs under this setting plus playing Oblivion for nearly 6 hours straight (my proc become 47-48C when playing Oblivion) , have not shut down yet. Is undervolting not goood eh bro?QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 8 2006, 04:30 PM) 58C load on 2.24 undervolt? that's hot, check hour hsf make sure got fix properly.... u think so? that what i am afraid mine 2.8 1.25volt load also 60C.... I think my proc problem also, e6300 is Allendale, mine under cpu-z state it as Conroe. i think my proc sudah gila This post has been edited by ravemaster: Dec 8 2006, 06:15 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 06:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,464 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
it is conroe..... ppl got confuse by allendale because of l2 cache...
the real allendale is the 4 series with lower FSB, confirmed by intel, i started a topic, but mod locked it saying it's old news and "everybody" knows.... QUOTE Allendale For a very long time, it was considered that stripped down versions of the Conroe processors were code-named Allendale. In actuality, Allendale is a code-name for a different processor. Many suggest that E6300 and E6400 are actually code-named Allendale, however, the E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz) processors are not code-named Allendale because they physically have 4 MB cache, same as their big brothers E6600 and E6700 - it is just that half of their physical memory is disabled. Traditionally, CPUs of the same family with less cache simply have the unavailable cache disabled (this allows parts that fail quality control to be sold at a lower rating). The fact that E6300 and E6400 are not code-named Allendale and actually code-named Conroe has been confirmed by Intel themselves. Quoted from The Tech Report: You'll find plenty of sources that will tell you the code name for these 2 MB Core 2 Duo processors is "Allendale," but Intel says otherwise. These CPUs are still code-named "Conroe," which makes sense since they're the same physical chips with half of their L2 cache disabled. Intel may well be cooking up a chip code-named Allendale with 2 MB of L2 cache natively, but this is not that chip. The real Allendale processors, including the E4300, will be released during Q1 2007. This post has been edited by deric88: Dec 8 2006, 06:17 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 11:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,597 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ravemaster @ Dec 8 2006, 06:11 PM) yup, currently running under that vcore value. Been running for nearly 24 hrs under this setting plus playing Oblivion for nearly 6 hours straight (my proc become 47-48C when playing Oblivion) , have not shut down yet. Is undervolting not goood eh bro? try 2 download latest version of cpuz n try againu think so? that what i am afraid I think my proc problem also, e6300 is Allendale, mine under cpu-z state it as Conroe. i think my proc sudah gila |
|
|
Dec 8 2006, 11:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,162 posts Joined: Sep 2004 |
No, its Conroe , all the current C2D is Conroe except Kentsfield (Q6700)
|
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 12:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,375 posts Joined: May 2005 From: MeeRee |
QUOTE(remysix @ Dec 7 2006, 09:41 PM) all the sudden people are pushing down the vcore instead of pushing the clock higher... bro remysixmy e6300 history at 3.2G: 1.375 --> 1.350 --> 1.331 --> 1.325 burning-in does help! im waiting ur crucial nice results ler |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 07:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,464 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
all except kentsfield and allendale (E4 series, E4300 etc etc)
undervoltage is now the latest thing to do |
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 11:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 11:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,597 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 11:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,464 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(gmail @ Dec 9 2006, 11:55 AM) din u read my quote?QUOTE Allendale For a very long time, it was considered that stripped down versions of the Conroe processors were code-named Allendale. In actuality, Allendale is a code-name for a different processor. Many suggest that E6300 and E6400 are actually code-named Allendale, however, the E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz) processors are not code-named Allendale because they physically have 4 MB cache, same as their big brothers E6600 and E6700 - it is just that half of their physical memory is disabled. Traditionally, CPUs of the same family with less cache simply have the unavailable cache disabled (this allows parts that fail quality control to be sold at a lower rating). The fact that E6300 and E6400 are not code-named Allendale and actually code-named Conroe has been confirmed by Intel themselves. Quoted from The Tech Report: You'll find plenty of sources that will tell you the code name for these 2 MB Core 2 Duo processors is "Allendale," but Intel says otherwise. These CPUs are still code-named "Conroe," which makes sense since they're the same physical chips with half of their L2 cache disabled. Intel may well be cooking up a chip code-named Allendale with 2 MB of L2 cache natively, but this is not that chip. The real Allendale processors, including the E4300, will be released during Q1 2007. anyway now running stable 1.225vcore 400x7 |
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 01:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,375 posts Joined: May 2005 From: MeeRee |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,162 posts Joined: Sep 2004 |
QUOTE(gmail @ Dec 9 2006, 11:55 AM) how many times u want deric88 to post up that fact so that u can clearly see it Theres no Allendale YET Wiki "E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz) processors are not code-named Allendale because they physically have 4 MB cache, same as their big brothers E6600 and E6700 - it is just that half of their physical memory is disabled" If there's a way to enable it , it would be awesome This post has been edited by s[H]sIkuA: Dec 9 2006, 02:33 PM |
|
|
Dec 9 2006, 05:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0282sec
0.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 07:08 PM |