Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
131 Pages « < 16 17 18 19 20 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits

views
     
DarkForce
post Dec 8 2006, 12:43 AM

short thinking syndrom
****
Senior Member
544 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: DarkForce@LYN.net



guys... need ur opinion here..
is this c2d batch for E6300 [ L629A291 ] is good or not??

btw.. thank all
ravemaster
post Dec 8 2006, 01:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
139 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


Hi guys!! I am a noob to oc and also here. This is the 1st time i am ocing anything in my life tongue.gif
I have a e6300 n gigabyte 965p ds3 mobo. Currently i am using intel factory fan and disabling cpu fan control feature (is this ok to do bros?).
I am only brave enough to set the fsb to 320, might increase it again after changing to newer cpu fan.

The current temp if idle for the cpu is 46C and can reach 58C when using TAT. Is this temp im getting is ideal or is it too hot? I afraid if too hot will burn the e6300 sweat.gif

I also have change the voltage from normal to 1.1375v..Will this setting affect the e6300?

So sorry for to many questions sweat.gif hope all if not anybody can give opinion notworthy.gif

user posted image
t3chn0m4nc3r
post Dec 8 2006, 12:59 PM

Teh Necron Lord
*******
Senior Member
4,139 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Internet


QUOTE(ravemaster @ Dec 8 2006, 02:08 AM)
I also have change the voltage from normal to 1.1375v..Will this setting affect the e6300?
*
is tat ur vCore...? blink.gif mine i 1.325 at stock... urs is undervoltage... got suddenly shut down...?
yehlai
post Dec 8 2006, 01:07 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N


He running 2.24GHz.. only oc a bit.
DaRkSyThE
post Dec 8 2006, 01:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
4,809 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



maybe i should follow u guys laugh.gif
just scared burn in then my proc burns out tongue.gif
yehlai
post Dec 8 2006, 01:59 PM

tree lover
*******
Senior Member
4,539 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N


QUOTE(remysix @ Dec 7 2006, 11:28 PM)
as long as u could get ur proc to work on
burn and burn baby...just dont let it crash...hehehe...
*
QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Dec 8 2006, 01:16 PM)
just scared burn in then my proc burns out tongue.gif
*
If you need to crash then crash and burn..
You're not alone icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by yehlai: Dec 8 2006, 02:00 PM
deric88
post Dec 8 2006, 04:30 PM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
58C load on 2.24 undervolt? that's hot, check hour hsf make sure got fix properly....
mine 2.8 1.25volt load also 60C....
remysix
post Dec 8 2006, 04:57 PM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Dec 8 2006, 01:16 PM)
maybe i should follow u guys laugh.gif
just scared burn in then my proc burns out tongue.gif
*
no burn out la bro...mine last time gila2 punya burnt till 90c...but yet to crash la... sweat.gif
ravemaster
post Dec 8 2006, 06:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
139 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Dec 8 2006, 12:59 PM)
is tat ur vCore...? blink.gif  mine i 1.325 at stock... urs is undervoltage... got suddenly shut down...?
*
yup, currently running under that vcore value. Been running for nearly 24 hrs under this setting plus playing Oblivion for nearly 6 hours straight (my proc become 47-48C when playing Oblivion) , have not shut down yet. Is undervolting not goood eh bro?

QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 8 2006, 04:30 PM)
58C load on 2.24 undervolt? that's hot, check hour hsf make sure got fix properly....
mine 2.8 1.25volt load also 60C....
*
u think so? that what i am afraid sweat.gif do you think reapplying a better thermal paste and reseating the heatsink will solve the excessive heat? I use cheap thermal paste i guess.

I think my proc problem also, e6300 is Allendale, mine under cpu-z state it as Conroe. i think my proc sudah gila sweat.gif

This post has been edited by ravemaster: Dec 8 2006, 06:15 PM
deric88
post Dec 8 2006, 06:15 PM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
it is conroe..... ppl got confuse by allendale because of l2 cache...
the real allendale is the 4 series with lower FSB, confirmed by intel, i started a topic, but mod locked it saying it's old news and "everybody" knows.... sleep.gif

QUOTE
Allendale

For a very long time, it was considered that stripped down versions of the Conroe processors were code-named Allendale. In actuality, Allendale is a code-name for a different processor. Many suggest that E6300 and E6400 are actually code-named Allendale, however, the E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz) processors are not code-named Allendale because they physically have 4 MB cache, same as their big brothers E6600 and E6700 - it is just that half of their physical memory is disabled. Traditionally, CPUs of the same family with less cache simply have the unavailable cache disabled (this allows parts that fail quality control to be sold at a lower rating). The fact that E6300 and E6400 are not code-named Allendale and actually code-named Conroe has been confirmed by Intel themselves.

Quoted from The Tech Report:

    You'll find plenty of sources that will tell you the code name for these 2 MB Core 2 Duo processors is "Allendale," but Intel says otherwise. These CPUs are still code-named "Conroe," which makes sense since they're the same physical chips with half of their L2 cache disabled. Intel may well be cooking up a chip code-named Allendale with 2 MB of L2 cache natively, but this is not that chip.

The real Allendale processors, including the E4300, will be released during Q1 2007.


This post has been edited by deric88: Dec 8 2006, 06:17 PM
gmail
post Dec 8 2006, 11:38 PM

Trolling Level
*******
Senior Member
2,597 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(ravemaster @ Dec 8 2006, 06:11 PM)
yup, currently running under that vcore value. Been running for nearly 24 hrs under this setting plus playing Oblivion for nearly 6 hours straight (my proc become 47-48C when playing Oblivion) , have not shut down yet. Is undervolting not goood eh bro?
u think so? that what i am afraid  sweat.gif  do you think reapplying a better thermal paste and reseating the heatsink will solve the excessive heat? I use cheap thermal paste i guess.

I think my proc problem also, e6300 is Allendale, mine under cpu-z state it as Conroe. i think my proc sudah gila  sweat.gif
*
try 2 download latest version of cpuz n try again
s[H]sIkuA
post Dec 8 2006, 11:57 PM

live in the present
*******
Senior Member
2,162 posts

Joined: Sep 2004


No, its Conroe , all the current C2D is Conroe except Kentsfield (Q6700)
siauann
post Dec 9 2006, 12:52 AM

Music-Movies-Coffee
*******
Senior Member
3,375 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: MeeRee


QUOTE(remysix @ Dec 7 2006, 09:41 PM)
all the sudden people are pushing down the vcore instead of pushing the clock higher... biggrin.gif ... just tried mine last nite...now running orthos for 22hrs at 458x7 wif 1.325 vcore...will stop at 24hrs...
my e6300 history at 3.2G: 1.375 --> 1.350 --> 1.331 --> 1.325
burning-in does help! thumbup.gif
*
bro remysix
im waiting ur crucial nice results ler brows.gif
deric88
post Dec 9 2006, 07:26 AM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
all except kentsfield and allendale (E4 series, E4300 etc etc)

undervoltage is now the latest thing to do biggrin.gif
t3chn0m4nc3r
post Dec 9 2006, 11:06 AM

Teh Necron Lord
*******
Senior Member
4,139 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Internet


QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 9 2006, 08:26 AM)
undervoltage is now the latest thing to do biggrin.gif
*
saving power...? rclxms.gif so any results yet...? please do post'em... can't believe some actually achieve higher clock than mine wif lower voltage... sad.gif
gmail
post Dec 9 2006, 11:55 AM

Trolling Level
*******
Senior Member
2,597 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(s[H]sIkuA @ Dec 8 2006, 11:57 PM)
No, its Conroe , all the current C2D is Conroe except Kentsfield (Q6700)
*
Allendale:
E6300
E6400

Conroe:
E6600
E6700
X6800

Kentsfield
QX6700
deric88
post Dec 9 2006, 11:58 AM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
QUOTE(gmail @ Dec 9 2006, 11:55 AM)
Allendale:
E6300
E6400

Conroe:
E6600
E6700
X6800

Kentsfield
QX6700
*
din u read my quote?
QUOTE
Allendale

For a very long time, it was considered that stripped down versions of the Conroe processors were code-named Allendale. In actuality, Allendale is a code-name for a different processor. Many suggest that E6300 and E6400 are actually code-named Allendale, however, the E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz) processors are not code-named Allendale because they physically have 4 MB cache, same as their big brothers E6600 and E6700 - it is just that half of their physical memory is disabled. Traditionally, CPUs of the same family with less cache simply have the unavailable cache disabled (this allows parts that fail quality control to be sold at a lower rating). The fact that E6300 and E6400 are not code-named Allendale and actually code-named Conroe has been confirmed by Intel themselves.

Quoted from The Tech Report:

    You'll find plenty of sources that will tell you the code name for these 2 MB Core 2 Duo processors is "Allendale," but Intel says otherwise. These CPUs are still code-named "Conroe," which makes sense since they're the same physical chips with half of their L2 cache disabled. Intel may well be cooking up a chip code-named Allendale with 2 MB of L2 cache natively, but this is not that chip.

The real Allendale processors, including the E4300, will be released during Q1 2007.



anyway now running stable 1.225vcore 400x7 thumbup.gif
siauann
post Dec 9 2006, 01:04 PM

Music-Movies-Coffee
*******
Senior Member
3,375 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: MeeRee


QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 9 2006, 11:58 AM)

anyway now running stable 1.225vcore 400x7  thumbup.gif
*
wow...i hvnt try tat low yet...now on 1.25v @ 400x7 for daily 24/7 usage smile.gif pass orthos more than 24hr smile.gif
will try 1.225 or lower soon tongue.gif
s[H]sIkuA
post Dec 9 2006, 02:29 PM

live in the present
*******
Senior Member
2,162 posts

Joined: Sep 2004


QUOTE(gmail @ Dec 9 2006, 11:55 AM)
Allendale:
E6300
E6400

Conroe:
E6600
E6700
X6800

Kentsfield
QX6700
*
how many times u want deric88 to post up that fact so that u can clearly see it tongue.gif tongue.gif

Theres no Allendale YET

Wiki

"E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz) processors are not code-named Allendale because they physically have 4 MB cache, same as their big brothers E6600 and E6700 - it is just that half of their physical memory is disabled"

If there's a way to enable it , it would be awesome laugh.gif

This post has been edited by s[H]sIkuA: Dec 9 2006, 02:33 PM
gengstapo
post Dec 9 2006, 05:43 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(DarkForce @ Dec 8 2006, 12:43 AM)
guys... need ur opinion here..
is this c2d batch for E6300 [ L629A291 ] is good or not??

btw.. thank all
*
ok laa..
most e63 & e64 OC'able more than the higher c2d range

This post has been edited by gengstapo: Dec 9 2006, 05:43 PM

131 Pages « < 16 17 18 19 20 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0282sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 07:08 PM