QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 2 2017, 05:25 PM)
Hi..What's your youtube channel link?
AMD (Malaysia) Official Thread
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 05:26 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
123 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 05:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,061 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Don't know. |
I suppose I'll migrate over to Ryzen 5 at the end of this year or so? When stocks are readily available and prices stabilized. That is if our RM didn't get shot to hell, that is. Pretty much have a general checklist on hand, well, roughly.
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 05:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,464 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(BlitzAce @ Mar 2 2017, 05:30 PM) I suppose I'll migrate over to Ryzen 5 at the end of this year or so? When stocks are readily available and prices stabilized. That is if our RM didn't get shot to hell, that is. Pretty much have a general checklist on hand, well, roughly. Would go for Ryzen 5 as well for the 6 cores thingy |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 05:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,241 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 06:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
493 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Melaka |
read a lot test in baidu, 1700/1700x easily oc at 4.0ghz at 1.342v (ryzen default voltage for 4.0ghz) and run stress test under 50c, commonly will 30c idle for OC.
Benchmark overpasses 6900k with 4.0, single core benchmark lower about 25% than 7700k ( maybe 7700k run 4.5, unconfirmed). At same 4.0ghz for gaming, mostly 1700x slower than 6900k/7700k (both remain 4.0ghz as well) about 10% fps. 1800k with turbo 4.0ghz on par with 6900k at gaming, but lower much in several game as well, reviewer thinks that maybe older game not utilize for 1800x tech. Overall result, its really well done 8 core CPU, especially very low temps. Waiting for price adjusment than mrsrp XD This post has been edited by eDwanD: Mar 2 2017, 06:51 PM |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 07:02 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Kanuki @ Mar 2 2017, 05:26 PM) Hi.. https://www.youtube.com/goldfriesWhat's your youtube channel link? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 08:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
479 posts Joined: May 2010 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 08:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,132 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 08:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,241 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
haha sleepless nights incoming
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 09:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,254 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
its up
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 10:00 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 10:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#892
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
As expected. Gaming performance falls behind Kaby lake but others higher than that.
Gotta wait for R5 to see any difference in performance especially in games |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 10:37 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#893
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010 |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Mar 2 2017, 10:35 PM) As expected. Gaming performance falls behind Kaby lake but others higher than that. Not too shabby for a first time Gotta wait for R5 to see any difference in performance especially in games This should mean AMD can claw back some market share, and that means more competition. More competition = happy consumers |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 10:40 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#894
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Mar 2 2017, 10:37 PM) Not too shabby for a first time Agreed. In the end it benefits us the consumer. This should mean AMD can claw back some market share, and that means more competition. More competition = happy consumers But from what i see,gaming benchmark varies with websites. I dont know why From this review http://www.toptengamer.com/amd-ryzen-7-170...i7-7700k-1800x/ It seems the performance not far from Kaby lake |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 10:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
479 posts Joined: May 2010 |
Looks great.
8 core 16 threads can finally be mainstream. |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 11:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,464 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-review-processor-leak/
If Ryzen 5 goes well, 6 core 12 thread is my target. |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 11:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
From HardwareCanucks
My opinion, perform as expected. |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 11:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
899 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Klang |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Mar 2 2017, 10:40 PM) Agreed. In the end it benefits us the consumer. The 1700 performance looks good! And 1700 about same price as 7700k right?But from what i see,gaming benchmark varies with websites. I dont know why From this review http://www.toptengamer.com/amd-ryzen-7-170...i7-7700k-1800x/ It seems the performance not far from Kaby lake |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 11:41 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 11:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
QUOTE(Zicron @ Mar 2 2017, 11:38 PM) Ya it is priced similarly.R7 1700 priced around RM 1600 whereas 7700k around 1.5k? But strangely, the review that i gave differs from most popular reviews Most reviews state that Ryzen gaming is behind 7700k but from the link that i gave it is closer or on par with 7700k. Something not right here Maybe goldfries can confirm why the discrepancy? |
| Change to: | 0.0179sec
1.92
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 06:46 AM |