Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

98 Pages « < 22 23 24 25 26 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Proton Suprima S

views
     
TSruffstuff
post Aug 17 2013, 09:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kae7 @ Aug 17 2013, 09:50 PM)
How about Honda?
*
Honda is DRB also. That is why we can see Proton now price their car dah macam Honda.

DRB punya pricing ada macam problem sikit. Tengok diorang price preve dkt AU, Thai dgn Indon. The price is not competitive at all for a showcase product to improve your brand image. If Proton punya image ok, no problem sell that price.
giovanni
post Aug 17 2013, 09:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,898 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Aug 17 2013, 09:43 PM)
No such thing as rebates through RnD.  There is such thing as RnD grant been given to proton. ~The grant is 200million per year.

The rebates the article referring to is before 2005, where proton/perodua did get tax rebate 50% in excise duty. Because of this, our goverment have been punish due to infringement of AFTA. Need to pay fine to thai/indo.

After 2005, proton no longer receive any tax rebate.  In terms of excise rate, proton get the lowest rating due to engine is locally produce. The lowest rate is 65% if im not mistaken. Other car markers is 75% for 1.6liter engine. If CKD the rating is as close as Proton. Nissan Almera is high on local content, that is why it is cheap.

If you saying RnD grant is protectionsm, it is a normal practice around the world.  RnD grant is given to any local company that do extensive RnD. Not only Proton. And 200 million is not a lot.  Ford, holden get more RnD grant from AU government.
In terms of tax, Proton does not have any advantage, in fact disadvantage. In langkawi, they do not enjoy the excise tax exemption because of custom act does not justify product originate from malaysia to have tax exemption. That is why Proton in langkawi is not that cheap.
*
Actually you just echoed what I said previously. If it's not clear enough, then should I say the grant is given as an R&D incentive which is essentially used to offset the tax. That is how proton can price its car at its current market prices (which is already not cheap).

This post has been edited by giovanni: Aug 17 2013, 10:00 PM
MR_alien
post Aug 17 2013, 09:54 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



QUOTE(SithBuster @ Aug 17 2013, 09:46 PM)
Wow, you're a designer? Should help design Proton's car wey, they really know nuts about design  rclxms.gif
*
from what i know
most part of proton's car nowadays are NOT design by proton themselves
sanadi
post Aug 17 2013, 09:56 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
9 posts

Joined: May 2012
Bottom line, car price currently is controlled more by the car companies, not the taxes.

If Toyota or Honda on Nissan or anyone can set the car price high, and still sell, they will. That is the value of a brand. Why sell at 60K when people will still buy the same product at 120K?

lepet
post Aug 17 2013, 09:58 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(sanadi @ Aug 17 2013, 09:47 PM)
That is why Toyota can sell high priced car in Malaysia, and give their staff 12 months bonus. When asked why their car is expensive, they just point to Proton. And people believe it. Kena kencing semua.
*
walauweyy.. 12 month bonus... selling car 50% less than produa... and get 12 month bonus???
must be profit margin per car very high...
giovanni
post Aug 17 2013, 09:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,898 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(lepet @ Aug 17 2013, 09:44 PM)
what i mean is some of malaysia women during ww2..
*
I know what you meant mate. Don't factor such thing (raping by a certain race during WW2) into our healthy forum. It's just a discussion. I stand corrected for my view here.
MR_alien
post Aug 17 2013, 09:59 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



QUOTE(lepet @ Aug 17 2013, 09:58 PM)
walauweyy.. 12 month bonus... selling car 50% less than produa... and get 12 month bonus???
must be profit margin per car very high...
*
yes, very
because so much hardcore fans
2 airbags, even if they set the price at 100k, still will sell well
thats why UMW SA have to thanks those "hardcore fans/blind fans" for their money
SoZa
post Aug 17 2013, 09:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
134 posts

Joined: May 2012
From: Kluang, Johor



QUOTE(SithBuster @ Aug 17 2013, 09:46 PM)
Wow, you're a designer? Should help design Proton's car wey, they really know nuts about design  rclxms.gif
*
I don't know nuts about designing cars laugh.gif I do believe Azlan O. Is a good designer, he is only being hold back by proton's part manufacturer capability.

My only criticism about Azlan O. Is his obsession with rising belt line, it screw the whole car porpotion. If preve has lower boot it will look smarter. The rising belt line also cause preve has poor rear visibility like many preve user complaint. The rear windscreen look like a peep hole. Proton not providing rear view camera are not helping either

Anyway from safety POV, bigger metal area means manufacturer can put more reinforcements for side impact protection
siegwarhiet
post Aug 17 2013, 10:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Ipoh, Perak


QUOTE(sctan1986 @ Aug 17 2013, 03:45 PM)
Proton is Potong , a national car company subsidized by Government and monopoly ONLY in Malaysia market and at the end potong face loss in revenue every year ,thats why call Potong .
*
I think seriously this dude just come out from Gua Temperung, Perak. Lol..
TSruffstuff
post Aug 17 2013, 10:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(giovanni @ Aug 17 2013, 09:54 PM)
Actually you just echoed what I said previously. If it's not clear enough, then should I say the grant is given as an R&D incentive which is essentially used to offset the tax. That is how proton can priced its car at its current market prices (which is already not cheap).
*
200 million is not enough to develop a car from scratch. Perodua myvi cost 220million. That is rebagde. Not much RnD going on. But 220 million.

Proton is much cost effective in developing car from scratch. Preve is 300 million. Suprima is 200 million.

As i said, RnD grant is normal practice. In fact, if the goverment really sincer in protecting proton, they should give more to Proton.

You should imagine how can proton sell at lower price if they do not have economies of scale. All parts for proton is costlier than Toyota.

This is why Proton is not cheap, but they trying to make it cheap just for the sake of people asking 'national car price'. So, that is why get a cheap car at the expense of quality.
lepet
post Aug 17 2013, 10:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(MR_alien @ Aug 17 2013, 09:59 PM)
yes, very
because so much hardcore fans
2 airbags, even if they set the price at 100k, still will sell well
thats why UMW SA have to thanks those "hardcore fans/blind fans" for their money
*
i guess profit margin per car for toyota is more than RM20k
giovanni
post Aug 17 2013, 10:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,898 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(sanadi @ Aug 17 2013, 09:56 PM)
Bottom line, car price currently is controlled more by the car companies, not the taxes.

If Toyota or Honda on Nissan or anyone can set the car price high, and still sell, they will. That is the value of a brand. Why sell at 60K when people will still buy the same product at 120K?
*
Actually it's the chicken and egg story again. You can't say it's not becos of the tax. You see, our gov imposed those taxes on all carmakers but smartly give the R&D incentive to our local carmakers to offset the said tax. It may look fair from one angle and unfair from another.

Morever, why the high excise tax in the first place? So now the foreign carmakers have excuses to jack up their prices and with the tax imposed on them you don't need me to elaborate further
dares
post Aug 17 2013, 10:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(MR_alien @ Aug 17 2013, 09:59 PM)
yes, very
because so much hardcore fans
2 airbags, even if they set the price at 100k, still will sell well
thats why UMW SA have to thanks those "hardcore fans/blind fans" for their money
*
The new Vios already open for booking since last month brows.gif
TSruffstuff
post Aug 17 2013, 10:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(MR_alien @ Aug 17 2013, 09:59 PM)
yes, very
because so much hardcore fans
2 airbags, even if they set the price at 100k, still will sell well
thats why UMW SA have to thanks those "hardcore fans/blind fans" for their money
*
QUOTE(lepet @ Aug 17 2013, 10:03 PM)
i guess profit margin per car for toyota is more than RM20k
*
If you guys have the time, read this http://econsmalaysia.blogspot.com/2013/06/...me-down-if.html

Got all the data directly from treasury department on how much excise tax government actually earned.
You'll be surprise that the actual excise tax collected is not more than 10 percent than what is supposed to be.

Profit margin is much higher than excise tax.
MR_alien
post Aug 17 2013, 10:07 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



QUOTE(lepet @ Aug 17 2013, 10:03 PM)
i guess profit margin per car for toyota is more than RM20k
*
not sure, need to see the AP
but should around 10-20k for that kind of spec
in malaysia, vios is kind of equivalent to a saga...so go figure
thats why i always say UMW is ripping us off
not only charge us expensive, before it even reach here, they kinda will remove some of the feature as well
lepet
post Aug 17 2013, 10:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(giovanni @ Aug 17 2013, 10:05 PM)
Actually it's the chicken and egg story again. You can't say it's not becos of the tax. You see, our gov imposed those taxes on all carmakers but smartly give the R&D incentive to our local carmakers to offset the said tax. It may look fair from one angle and unfair from another.

Morever, why the high excise tax in the first place? So now the foreign carmakers have excuses to jack up their prices and with the tax imposed on them you don't need me to elaborate further
*
and yet after the govt tax, still can give 12 month bonus???

really does not make any sense... must be the profit margin very very high..

This post has been edited by lepet: Aug 17 2013, 10:11 PM
MR_alien
post Aug 17 2013, 10:09 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



QUOTE(dares @ Aug 17 2013, 10:06 PM)
The new Vios already open for booking since last month  brows.gif
*
if not wrong already received 1k++ booking brows.gif
another good bonus year
lepet
post Aug 17 2013, 10:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(MR_alien @ Aug 17 2013, 10:07 PM)
not sure, need to see the AP
but should around 10-20k for that kind of spec
in malaysia, vios is kind of equivalent to a saga...so go figure
thats why i always say UMW is ripping us off
not only charge us expensive, before it even reach here, they kinda will remove some of the feature as well
*
what i heard they remove fr n rear bumber beam...
dares
post Aug 17 2013, 10:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(giovanni @ Aug 17 2013, 10:05 PM)
Morever, why the high excise tax in the first place? So now the foreign carmakers have excuses to jack up their prices and with the tax imposed on them you don't need me to elaborate further
*
IINM, the intention was to encourage the growth of the local parts manufacturing industry.

But sad to say, it is the crony-linked manufacturers that reap the benefits.
danabu
post Aug 17 2013, 10:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
419 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Aug 17 2013, 10:03 PM)
200 million is not enough to develop a car from scratch.  Perodua myvi cost 220million. That is rebagde. Not much RnD going on.  But 220 million.

Proton is much cost effective in developing car from scratch. Preve is 300 million. Suprima is 200 million.

As i said, RnD grant is normal practice. In fact, if the goverment really sincer in protecting proton, they should give more to Proton.

You should imagine how can proton sell at lower price if they do not have economies of scale. All parts for proton is costlier than Toyota. 

This is why Proton is not cheap, but they trying to make it cheap just for the sake of people asking 'national car price'.  So, that is why get a cheap car at the expense of quality.
*
Yup. RnD grant for all truly malaysian owned company. Not only P1, but extend to other company and products. I always support. In fact many country do this. thumbup.gif

98 Pages « < 22 23 24 25 26 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0262sec    0.57    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 03:52 PM