QUOTE(CityBluePrint @ Oct 30 2012, 02:36 PM)
Most of us heard about Kayle Leogrande. He was suspended for 2 years based on “nonanalytical” evidence, rather than failed drug tests.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/18/sports/c...?pagewanted=allLikewise if you missed your tests (remember MU Rio Ferdinand?) just like chicken did technically & legally he failed the Doping 'non-analytical tests! No? Matter of semantics I suppose.

i am not on armstrong's side at this point in time...
but slight difference between his case, kayle leogrande, floyd and rasmussen or even frank schleck for that matter...
in Kayle's case and this is from your article, physical evidence of him with EPO that i think counts as more physical than just pure verbal testimonies
QUOTE
Her testimony, and evidence provided by Papp — photographs of Leogrande with EPO and a handwritten note — sank Leogrande.
there was mentioned about novitzky as well... and this is where more confusion comes into place... i think only 2 reasons why novitzky could not get enough facts to pursue armstrong and ultimately led to closure on the case... political pressure from higher rank's that has links to armstrong... or he really could not find solid evidences that he would even have the confidence to bring to court to be used against armstrong or his team really did not have the methods to uncover how armstrong managed to mask his blood doping in recent years... either way... no one knows why and novitzky had no agenda against armstrong as far as i know making him the least likely to go after him due to a vendetta...
floyd, got caught red handed with skewed testosterone levels from his stage 17 attack
rasmussen, physically the officials could not find him... slightly grey.. but it did happen unless the officials are against him and lied about couldn't locate him...
frank and alberto, each with recorded abnormal blood or urine samples from the offending tests...
again, not on armstrong's side... USADA as far as i skip sailed through the 202 page Reasoned Decision document did not provide much proof on actual tests other than mentioning of the old tour de swiss and the cortisone incident and a lot of damning fess up stories by armstrong's close buddies... this is partly why some who still supports him... if there is independent studies that came up to show that his blood samples from 09 is abnormal.. this will really shut each and everyone up and he won't get the benefit of the doubt...
but, i do agree that it will be crazy to get 26 people to lie against you... so, based on that... i too would have sanctioned armstrong no matter which rule says i can't do so... if it is real that 26 people lied... then it would be the biggest cover up of the century...
this is where the case is unique and will become the most unique if not biggest doping story of many years to come...
Added on October 30, 2012, 6:28 pmQUOTE(CityBluePrint @ Oct 30 2012, 02:54 PM)
What does Roger Clemens & Lance Armstrong have in common?
Besides both from Texas & counted Bush as friend.
Roger Clemens was indicted for perjury for lying to Congress but was acquitted! FBI dropped their cases or investigation against Roger & LA (political reasons IMO).
Roger Clemens sued UNSUCCESSFULLY his former personal strength coach, who was his prime accuser and witness in the Court hearing.
Now the worm has turned for Roger Clemens.
Roger Clemens is now facing a defamation suit by Brian McNamee, his former 'soigneur' .
Roger Clemens is charged for defaming McNamee during the trials.
Roger Clemens and all the dirt will be dug up in this defamation suit (anything is fair game in a civil suit) and Roger might go to jail if he commits perjury or lying.
So far with me?
Isn't that what would happened if Lance Armstrong were to face his 11 accusers (7 of them didn't have to confess) in the USADA arbitration of Sports hearing.
Open up a can of worms?
The legal ramifications are extensive. Will LA want to take the risk of going on the stand ala Roger Clemens?
I doubt it. Like most of us claim does he have the pair?
yup... i agree... he is not dumb enough to go on trial with 26 people against his words... based on that, he already had every chance he will ever get wiped off... and UCI, USADA and WADA all acknowledge that all his past tests is invalid as an argument to the defense of the case...
but if bruyneel continues to CAS as planned.. he will still be knee deep in it as he is still linked to all this on top of having to be subpeona'ed... and there is no guarantees that the feds will not re-open the case like how SCA promotions wants lance to return all the money he got from them...
armstrong too had a soigneur he managed to pummel in court... along with a bike mechanic / personal assistant, fillipo simeoni, kimmage & walsh, lemonde... i think he has more enemies than clemens...
let's jus sit back and watch and not speculate... it'll be an exciting cycling off season this year...
the only thing lance can do now is to disappear off the face of the planet...
Added on October 30, 2012, 6:34 pmQUOTE(lilredridinghood @ Oct 30 2012, 02:50 PM)
Thanks butthead, it pretty much clarifies what I am looking at. Time to do some research over the brands as well as the difference between Sora, Tiagra and 105.
How's Merida BTW? I hear it does give pretty good value in terms of money spent?
Merida is not too bad.. not the best, but also not the most expensive...
between Merida and some crazy unknown taiwanese brands... i'd take the former...
QUOTE(vin_ann @ Oct 30 2012, 02:50 PM)
Oi... where's ma Doremon Giant brand?
Additional info:
If brand is not a major concern, currently Velocipede Works at Sunway offer FULL 105 groupset on aluminum bike for RM3.8++
oh yeah... if brand is not major concern, at the same shop, Velocipede Works at Sunway offer Ultegra groupset on Carbon bike for about RM7k++.
i said not to name names mar...
wah..dun taruh so big racun la... but, ultegra on carbon for only RM7k... i saw 105 also already 7k... is it neilpryde?
This post has been edited by butthead: Oct 30 2012, 06:34 PM