Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 33 34 35 36 37 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

English Clubs Liverpool Football Club - The Kop Talks 2011, Liverpool 2 -1 Wolves : LS7 scored again

views
     
visionary1993
post Sep 2 2011, 11:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(hfi @ Sep 2 2011, 11:20 AM)
Don't think that will happen. Lucas is a very important player now for the team, more so than even Gerrard himself. I go as far to say that he's now part of the backbone of the new Liverpool team under Kenny. Look at how the team was concerned when he went down injured during the first half against Bolton. Besides, Gerrard will be wasted if he spend most of his time staying back screening the defense when he could be staying further up, marauding in the final 3rd. Imo, keep Lucas and Adam as CM duo as you get the near perfect balance of creativity and toughness to dominate the midfield. Then have Gerrard, Suarez, and Downing as the attacking 3 supporting the main striker. What i've noticed under Kenny is that the attacking 3 would always inter change positions through out the game. With those 3, you can see them swapping flanks all day long and not looked out of place. It's even more effective when Kuyt is deployed as a striker as you
even could see the striker dropping back or down the flank and Suarez taking over as the main striker. Has not worked so well with Carroll up top tho.
*
The thing about it is, IMO, Lucas is the only position and member of the team that is replaceble. No matter how he has captivated our hearts last season. Im just saying that we need that extra attacking player in our team. Yes, Lucas is essential to the team as a breaking up play guy, but that also be done by Gerrard, and what more, Gerrard has more ability than Lucas has in control and vision, not that im undermining Lucas or anything. Adam to me needs to stay in the team as that added vision to the field. No offense of anything but Lucas has that defensive ability that alot of our youngsters have.

inb4 some random tart replies about me bashing Lucas and cut the Lucas bashing etc.
chenwfng
post Sep 2 2011, 11:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
46 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(visionary1993 @ Sep 2 2011, 11:28 AM)
The thing about it is, IMO, Lucas is the only position and member of the team that is replaceble. No matter how he has captivated our hearts last season. Im just saying that we need that extra attacking player in our team. Yes, Lucas is essential to the team as a breaking up play guy, but that also be done by Gerrard, and what more, Gerrard has more ability than Lucas has in control and vision, not that im undermining Lucas or anything. Adam to me needs to stay in the team as that added vision to the field. No offense of anything but Lucas has that defensive ability that alot of our youngsters have.

inb4 some random tart replies about me bashing Lucas and cut the Lucas bashing etc.
*
Agreed. I like Lucas too and also believe he is essential to the team, breaking up their momentum and sort but to me, given the chance I would rather field Gerrard who can play a deeper role at CM and has better passing abilities than Lucas. Not bashing Lucas or suggesting we take him out of the starting 11, just merely stating that if we want to get more years from Gerrard then he has to change his style of play because we are already seeing him getting injured too often.
hfi
post Sep 2 2011, 11:46 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
598 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(visionary1993 @ Sep 2 2011, 11:28 AM)
The thing about it is, IMO, Lucas is the only position and member of the team that is replaceble. No matter how he has captivated our hearts last season. Im just saying that we need that extra attacking player in our team. Yes, Lucas is essential to the team as a breaking up play guy, but that also be done by Gerrard, and what more, Gerrard has more ability than Lucas has in control and vision, not that im undermining Lucas or anything. Adam to me needs to stay in the team as that added vision to the field. No offense of anything but Lucas has that defensive ability that alot of our youngsters have.

inb4 some random tart replies about me bashing Lucas and cut the Lucas bashing etc.
*
It's not about sentiments, it's a fact that he's the best DM in the team. No one can do what he does, not even Gerrard - at least not without you sacrificing Gerrard's other abilities which is attacking and terrorizing the oppositions. If you were to ask the oppositions whether they prefer Gerrard to stay back defending or attacking them i bet they would choose the former. Also a lot of people thinks it's easy to play DM when it's actually not. It's not just about getting yourself dirty going down tackling. It's also about reading the game and having the tactical discipline to stay in sync with the rest of the team. I can't be bothered to find the quotes but there are plethora of quotes from managers and coaches who claimed Gerrard simply do not have the tactical brain to become a central midfielder. At this point of his career, there's no point to reinvent the wheels and have him do something which he has not able to do with great success. I know what you're trying to say but for me it's counter productive to force out a DM out of hte team so we could play an attacking minded player to play as a DM.
visionary1993
post Sep 2 2011, 12:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(hfi @ Sep 2 2011, 11:46 AM)
It's not about sentiments, it's a fact that he's the best DM in the team. No one can do what he does, not even Gerrard - at least not without you sacrificing Gerrard's other abilities which is attacking and terrorizing the oppositions. If you were to ask the oppositions whether they prefer Gerrard to stay back defending or attacking them i bet they would choose the former. Also a lot of people thinks it's easy to play DM when it's actually not. It's not just about getting yourself dirty going down tackling. It's also about reading the game and having the tactical discipline to stay in sync with the rest of the team. I can't be bothered to find the quotes but there are plethora of quotes from managers and coaches who claimed Gerrard simply do not have the tactical brain to become a central midfielder. At this point of his career, there's no point to reinvent the wheels and have him do something which he has not able to do with great success. I know what you're trying to say but for me it's counter productive to force out a DM out of hte team so we could play an attacking minded player to play as a DM.
*
Yes, Lucas is the best dm in the team, but IMHO, 3 years of holding that position in the team would make everyone think he's the best cause
there really isnt anybody else we saw in that position barring spearing.
Again i dont thin kanyone really knows this for certain but, i believe gerrard has that mind, courage, and is a complete midfielder that can play defensively well. i believe Gerrard can anchor it well.
I play as a dm in my team. Well my preferred position is a dm. But i realise apart from the defensive abilities, the judgement and sometimes guessing players movements, i feel that if i cant contribute more than that, i feel im more like
a waste of a player in the team. I dont know if you guys understand this but i feel even as a
dm, you need that extra vision, extra atacking ability.
Im looking for a mascherano and alonso like player in just one player and i could see that in gerrard.

Edit : I dont know if i make sense or
what but to put it short I believe Gerrard has that tenacity to be that dm for us. Not undermining Lucas in anyway. I believe Gerrard is suitable for that position at this moment and current time we have now.

This post has been edited by visionary1993: Sep 2 2011, 12:22 PM
hfi
post Sep 2 2011, 12:26 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
598 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(chenwfng @ Sep 2 2011, 11:40 AM)
Agreed. I like Lucas too and also believe he is essential to the team, breaking up their momentum and sort but to me, given the chance I would rather field Gerrard who can play a deeper role at CM and has better passing abilities than Lucas. Not bashing Lucas or suggesting we take him out of the starting 11, just merely stating that if we want to get more years from Gerrard then he has to change his style of play because we are already seeing him getting injured too often.
*
You do realize that playing as a central mid requires you to do more than an attacking midfielder. You have greater defensive responsibility which means he has to track all over the pitch chasing and combating younger, stronger and faster players. Basically there's more physical and mental exertion playing as a central mid than it is playing as an attacking midfielder. He would not have this kind of responsibility if he would to play further up the pitch.

QUOTE(visionary1993 @ Sep 2 2011, 12:01 PM)
Yes, Lucas is the best dm in the team, but IMHO, 3 years of holding that position in the team would make everyone think he's the best cause
there really isnt anybody else we saw in that position barring spearing.
Again i dont thin kanyone really knows this for certain but, i believe gerrard has that mind, courage, and is a complete midfielder that can play defensively well. i believe Gerrard can anchor it well.
I play as a dm in my team. Well my preferred position is a dm. But i realise apart from the defensive abilities, the judgement and sometimes guessing players movements, i feel that if i cant contribute more than that, i feel im more like
a waste of a player in the team. I dont know if you guys understand this but i feel even as a
dm, you need that extra vision, extra atacking ability.
Im looking for a mascherano and alonso like player in just one player and i could see that in gerrard.
*
You're saying we could improve by having Gerrard playing by anchoring him, that's a step forward ? That's like saying lets play Kuyt or Maxi at fullbacks so we can have more attack minded fullbacks. It doesn't work that way. Kinda like forcing in a wrong piece to fit into an entire jigsaw puzzle for the sake of one piece. Gerrard may look like the piece but he's not the piece in its entirety if that makes any sense. As a result it becomes more of a hindrance rather than an improvement and interrupting the entire balance of the structure of the team. The team is looking good now, there's good balance and can get better in time. You have Lucas doing what Masc was doing but better because he links up a lot better than Masc ever did for us. He also delegates the better attacking players around him to do the offensive work, which means player like Adam gets to express himself. This will not happen when Gerrard hogs the ball in central mid. Don't fix if it aint broke. Funny how we used to berate Rafa for tinkering with the team and now some of us want to do just that.

This post has been edited by hfi: Sep 2 2011, 12:27 PM
leaF
post Sep 2 2011, 12:29 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
517 posts

Joined: Jan 2008



QUOTE(Duke Red @ Sep 2 2011, 10:47 AM)
I don't think you need to be incredibly young to play behind the front man. I mean the likes of Dennis Bergkamp, Jari Litmanen and Teddy Sheringham played in that position well into their twilight years.
*
even King Kenny himself played in that position until he retired

QUOTE(visionary1993 @ Sep 2 2011, 10:50 AM)
I want gerrard to play Lucas's position. Sacrificing Adam's creativity with the ball is a big
no no for me. His passes made somewhat half of all our chances really.
*
Gerrard lack of discipline and I am sure he wont be happy not joining the attack with the likes of suarez , carroll , bellamy and kuyt.
vreis
post Sep 2 2011, 12:30 PM

Golden Past Red Future
******
Senior Member
1,658 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Spion Kop


QUOTE(hfi @ Sep 2 2011, 11:46 AM)
It's not about sentiments, it's a fact that he's the best DM in the team. No one can do what he does, not even Gerrard - at least not without you sacrificing Gerrard's other abilities which is attacking and terrorizing the oppositions. If you were to ask the oppositions whether they prefer Gerrard to stay back defending or attacking them i bet they would choose the former. Also a lot of people thinks it's easy to play DM when it's actually not. It's not just about getting yourself dirty going down tackling. It's also about reading the game and having the tactical discipline to stay in sync with the rest of the team. I can't be bothered to find the quotes but there are plethora of quotes from managers and coaches who claimed Gerrard simply do not have the tactical brain to become a central midfielder. At this point of his career, there's no point to reinvent the wheels and have him do something which he has not able to do with great success. I know what you're trying to say but for me it's counter productive to force out a DM out of hte team so we could play an attacking minded player to play as a DM.
*
Not only tactical brain, but he doesn't have the required discipline as well to sit still as in his area. Looks no further than when he & Lampard played as CM for England. Notice how he always involves & dragged all over the field by tactically sound teams. & ever wonder why Capello put him wide on left instead of Lampard?
It's not coincident that coaches from GH to SGE till RB & Capello all played him anywhere but CM. Maybe 'forummers' are better qualified than those prosessional & renowned coaches afterall whistling.gif
It's only when he learns to reign in his instinct & play to his tactical requirement that he'll be able to play as DM. He HAS the ability but not the discipline & tactical brain.

Oh btw hfi, u been long gone from this thread, its a freaking sin to talk bad about Stevie, whether to sell him (theoritically), shove him to the right or whatever. He's untouchable here whistling.gif
chenwfng
post Sep 2 2011, 12:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
46 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(vreis @ Sep 2 2011, 12:30 PM)
Not only tactical brain, but he doesn't have the required discipline as well to sit still as in his area. Looks no further than when he & Lampard played as CM for England. Notice how he always involves & dragged all over the field by tactically sound teams. & ever wonder why Capello put him wide on left instead of Lampard?
It's not coincident that coaches from GH to SGE till RB & Capello all played him anywhere but CM. Maybe 'forummers' are better qualified than those prosessional & renowned coaches afterall whistling.gif
It's only when he learns to reign in his instinct & play to his tactical requirement that he'll be able to play as DM. He HAS the ability but not the discipline & tactical brain.

Oh btw hfi, u been long gone from this thread, its a freaking sin to talk bad about Stevie, whether to sell him (theoritically), shove him to the right or whatever. He's untouchable here whistling.gif
*
Why do you say its a freaking sin?
visionary1993
post Sep 2 2011, 12:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(hfi @ Sep 2 2011, 12:26 PM)
You do realize that playing as a central mid requires you to do more than an attacking midfielder. You have greater defensive responsibility which means he has to track all over the pitch chasing and combating younger, stronger and faster players. Basically there's more physical and mental exertion playing as a central mid than it is playing as an attacking midfielder. He would not have this kind of responsibility if he would to play further up the pitch.
You're saying we could improve by having Gerrard playing by anchoring him, that's a step forward ? That's like saying lets play Kuyt or Maxi at fullbacks so we can have more attack minded fullbacks. It doesn't work that way. Kinda like forcing in a wrong piece to fit into an entire jigsaw puzzle for the sake of one piece. Gerrard may look like the piece but he's not the piece in its entirety if that makes any sense.  As a result it becomes more of a hindrance rather than an improvement and interrupting the entire balance of the structure of the team. The team is looking good now, there's good balance and can get better in time. You have Lucas doing what Masc was doing but better because he links up a lot better than Masc ever did for us. He also delegates the better attacking players around him to do the offensive work, which means player like Adam gets to express himself. This will not happen when Gerrard hogs the ball in central mid. Don't fix if it aint broke. Funny how we used to berate Rafa for tinkering with the team and now some of us want to do just that.
*
This is about Gerrard moving to a defensive midfield pos. not moving him to a the defense like what your trying to say about Kuyt.
This isnt fixing anything. More of an improvement than anything.
hfi
post Sep 2 2011, 12:49 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
598 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(vreis @ Sep 2 2011, 12:30 PM)
Not only tactical brain, but he doesn't have the required discipline as well to sit still as in his area. Looks no further than when he & Lampard played as CM for England. Notice how he always involves & dragged all over the field by tactically sound teams. & ever wonder why Capello put him wide on left instead of Lampard?
It's not coincident that coaches from GH to SGE till RB & Capello all played him anywhere but CM. Maybe 'forummers' are better qualified than those prosessional & renowned coaches afterall whistling.gif
It's only when he learns to reign in his instinct & play to his tactical requirement that he'll be able to play as DM. He HAS the ability but not the discipline & tactical brain.

Oh btw hfi, u been long gone from this thread, its a freaking sin to talk bad about Stevie, whether to sell him (theoritically), shove him to the right or whatever. He's untouchable here whistling.gif
*
I do read the thread but only chip in every now and then. Season just started so i'll be involved much more now. Anyways yeah, a lot of coaches have problems with Gerrard in CM, it's not entirely Gerrard's fault. He wouldn't be the awesome midfielder that he is today if not for his flaws. It's his unpredictability and relentless marauding runs that made him what he is today. Which is why some of us feel it's counter productive to put a shackle on him by deploying him in central mid. Maybe Kenny can pull it off but it hasn't work in a decade and there's the saying that you can't teach an old dog new tricks. We'll see what happens i suppose.
visionary1993
post Sep 2 2011, 01:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(leaF @ Sep 2 2011, 12:29 PM)
even King Kenny himself played in that position until he retired
Gerrard lack of discipline and I am sure he wont be happy not joining the attack with the likes of suarez , carroll , bellamy and kuyt.
*
Happy or not it really is up to him to be. He should know that he should be happy whatever position he plays in and not sulk.

QUOTE(vreis @ Sep 2 2011, 12:30 PM)
Not only tactical brain, but he doesn't have the required discipline as well to sit still as in his area. Looks no further than when he & Lampard played as CM for England. Notice how he always involves & dragged all over the field by tactically sound teams. & ever wonder why Capello put him wide on left instead of Lampard?
It's not coincident that coaches from GH to SGE till RB & Capello all played him anywhere but CM. Maybe 'forummers' are better qualified than those prosessional & renowned coaches afterall whistling.gif
It's only when he learns to reign in his instinct & play to his tactical requirement that he'll be able to play as DM. He HAS the ability but not the discipline & tactical brain.

Oh btw hfi, u been long gone from this thread, its a freaking sin to talk bad about Stevie, whether to sell him (theoritically), shove him to the right or whatever. He's untouchable here whistling.gif
*
Well excuse the amount of sarcasm in your post, but that lampard, gerrard part. Who really knows what is the main cause? All i see is Gerrard moving to the left cause he's that complete of a midfielder to play anywhere not freaking lampard who well if you ever have seen him playing other than a cnetral midfielder? They are both two identical to each other and playing one of them centrally
is sufficient. Lampard cant play elsewhere. Hence the reason Gerrard is moved, IMHO.

Replying to one of ur sarcasm, nobody is untouchable not even even freaking Lucas. Gerrard can rot in the bench if he's not good enough, but he isnt.
hfi
post Sep 2 2011, 01:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
598 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(visionary1993 @ Sep 2 2011, 12:44 PM)
This is about Gerrard moving to a defensive midfield pos. not moving him to a the defense like what your trying to say about Kuyt.
This isnt fixing anything. More of an improvement than anything.
*
It's fixing when you are removing a player who currently happens to be one of our best performers on the pitch, and replacing him with another who's yet to play as a DM. Improvement would be replacing someone like Babel with Suarez. That's a major improvement. With Lucas and Gerrard it's not as clear cut as that. You add a bit of creativity which is lost when he's anchored behind the attacking players, at the cost of losing a player with superior tactical discipline and not to mention a more resilient individual. Sometimes less is more.
koolspyda
post Sep 2 2011, 01:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(weichieh007 @ Sep 1 2011, 11:52 AM)
Kinda feel like us being a feeder club for Chelsea for the last 2 years with the sale of
1. Benanyoun
2. Torres
3. Mereiles

Who's next?
*
we all gave slack when torres handed the transfer request, yet had little went to deride the other 2 !

Some even gave credit to RH for bringing Meireles (btw RH didn't even know why n where is meireles position!- go figure)

meireles only did really shine after RH left, in which meant he 'could' be 'less' versitile as we thought of him (just).

I do wish he (meireles) didn't hand it in but I guess he knows he ain't that 'young n having to play bit part in probably his best years, he is doing it for 'footballing' reasons. I wish him well.

[edit]
The thing about gerrard is that he's super versitile, n LFc/England coaches/manager knows that, in the tosh between lampard n gerrard, cappelo know lampard limitation n chooses to sacrifice gerrards versitility to accommodated him.

The thing about being "super versitile" is the vanurability to hone your best position, in which may cause gerrards game not going to a higher level.

As to the ex reds who now don Chelsea colours. I wish all of them well (they may struggle early season as I don't think they (rest of chelsea players) had enough time to gel to new managers vision, except maybe meireles, who did play VB before

This post has been edited by koolspyda: Sep 2 2011, 01:25 PM
LukeMjstc
post Sep 2 2011, 01:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
50 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(hfi @ Sep 2 2011, 11:46 AM)
It's not about sentiments, it's a fact that he's the best DM in the team. No one can do what he does, not even Gerrard - at least not without you sacrificing Gerrard's other abilities which is attacking and terrorizing the oppositions. If you were to ask the oppositions whether they prefer Gerrard to stay back defending or attacking them i bet they would choose the former. Also a lot of people thinks it's easy to play DM when it's actually not. It's not just about getting yourself dirty going down tackling. It's also about reading the game and having the tactical discipline to stay in sync with the rest of the team. I can't be bothered to find the quotes but there are plethora of quotes from managers and coaches who claimed Gerrard simply do not have the tactical brain to become a central midfielder. At this point of his career, there's no point to reinvent the wheels and have him do something which he has not able to do with great success. I know what you're trying to say but for me it's counter productive to force out a DM out of hte team so we could play an attacking minded player to play as a DM.
*
As usual, ppl always ignore the importance of good defending and it's never easy to defend well. One wrong judgement and you let opponent pass through; one wrong step and your goalkeeper will be exposed; one wrong tackle and you will be fouled or even carded. You see, defending is as important as offence and being good in defence is much harder than being good in offence since one won't blame you too much if you lost the ball upfront once in awhile but ppl will bash you a lot when you lost the ball at the back and subsequently conceded goals.

Just my 2 cents. biggrin.gif
hyperyouth_firepower
post Sep 2 2011, 02:00 PM

BlackBerry enthusiast
******
Senior Member
1,964 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sabah, Malaysia.


I'll ask you guys to read this one. Here's the one I got my source from. Taken from RAWK.


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


anyways if you have your brains busted reading this, back to the Lucas vs Gerrard on DM role,

my point is Lucas has been doing it almost his entire career, and he plays well to the orchestra, no under-doing, no overdoing it.
visionary1993
post Sep 2 2011, 02:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(hfi @ Sep 2 2011, 01:07 PM)
It's fixing when you are removing a player who currently happens to be one of our best performers on the pitch, and replacing him with another who's yet to play as a DM. Improvement would be replacing someone like Babel with Suarez. That's a major improvement. With Lucas and Gerrard it's not as clear cut as that. You add a bit of creativity which is lost when he's anchored behind the attacking players, at the cost of losing a player with superior tactical discipline and not to mention a more resilient individual. Sometimes less is more.
*
I get you, its just that i have an oppinion that Gerrard has that discipline and tenacity somewhere just that he doesnt has the motivation to show it. Ignore his age, i think he has that potential. I feel it is an added creativity when Gerrard is in the starting 11 not lost. I mean we are without Gerrard now, but when he's fully recover and in the team, the creativity goes up no matter where
he's put at, no?
shamsul_LP
post Sep 2 2011, 02:26 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
673 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Malaysia our heavenly home



i agree choose lucas instead of gerrard for DM....
if play gerrard & adam as midfielder, surely our defensive part will suffer....adam & gerrard defensive ability is not so good...the best position for him for now is AM or RM

This post has been edited by shamsul_LP: Sep 2 2011, 02:26 PM
visionary1993
post Sep 2 2011, 02:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(LukeMjstc @ Sep 2 2011, 01:39 PM)
As usual, ppl always ignore the importance of good defending and it's never easy to defend well. One wrong judgement and you let opponent pass through; one wrong step and your goalkeeper will be exposed; one wrong tackle and you will be fouled or even carded. You see, defending is as important as offence and being good in defence is much harder than being good in offence since one won't blame you too much if you lost the ball upfront once in awhile but ppl will bash you a lot when you lost the ball at the back and subsequently conceded goals.

Just my 2 cents.  biggrin.gif
*
Yes, its important. Even i play defensively in a team. But here in Liverpool FC, i think we have a lot of share of defensive minded players. Please dont take me as an offensive minded guy, im actually pretty defensive in my game too. I give credit where its due.


Added on September 2, 2011, 2:31 pm
QUOTE(shamsul_LP @ Sep 2 2011, 02:26 PM)
i agree choose lucas instead of gerrard for DM....
if play gerrard & adam as midfielder, surely our defensive part will suffer....adam & gerrard defensive ability is not so good...the best position for him for now is AM or RM
*
I believe if given the same amount of time Lucas had with Gerrard. He too can be on par ifnot better. Thats just my perspective.

This post has been edited by visionary1993: Sep 2 2011, 02:31 PM
80toyshop
post Sep 2 2011, 02:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
44 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
From: Your 80's Toy Shop


gerrard is not suited to play def mid, he's too used to getting forward taking long shots and his tackling & postiion sucks. maybe as CM but defintely not DM
visionary1993
post Sep 2 2011, 02:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(80toyshop @ Sep 2 2011, 02:37 PM)
gerrard is not suited to play def mid, he's too used to getting forward taking long shots and his tackling & postiion sucks.  maybe as CM but defintely not DM
*
Dayum, he has this injury for months now. Surely i dont think he's used to anything. My only fear this long injury could take some might out of him.

124 Pages « < 33 34 35 36 37 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0218sec    0.78    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 08:57 AM