Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !

views
     
Agito666
post Aug 1 2011, 09:25 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 09:12 AM)
Hmm, you're right. I don't think current models with top LCD doesn't have an AF motor.
*
got top LCD = not beginner body.

not beginner body = got AF motor inside

got AF motor inside = can use old lens.

can use old lens = more market / STILL can sell old lens brows.gif

tongue.gif
honkit
post Aug 1 2011, 09:52 AM

Airbus-er.
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Your Neighbour
Guys, I currently have an AF-D 80-200. Wanna get a teleconverter for it. As far as i know that nikon teleconverter cannot support AF-D. Do u guys know any other teleconverter for AF-D?
VaLeNrUdOn
post Aug 1 2011, 10:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
166 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Penang


hi guys..newbie here with 5100....can a 50mm f1.4 AF-s work on my camera? or do i have to get the 35mm f1.8?
Agito666
post Aug 1 2011, 10:29 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(VaLeNrUdOn @ Aug 1 2011, 10:16 AM)
hi guys..newbie here with 5100....can a 50mm f1.4 AF-s work on my camera? or do i have to get the 35mm f1.8?
*
lens got AF motor sure can work with 5100, 35mm f/1.8 sure can work with D5100 tongue.gif
azrinarizz
post Aug 1 2011, 10:54 AM

Made in Malaysia!
*******
Senior Member
2,448 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(honkit @ Aug 1 2011, 09:52 AM)
Guys, I currently have an AF-D 80-200. Wanna get a teleconverter for it. As far as i know that nikon teleconverter cannot support AF-D. Do u guys know any other teleconverter for AF-D?
*
From what I know, you can either find a nikon TC with those apeture ring on it or use a kenko tc. Kenko allows you to autofocus and many say its sharper than the old nikon tc's rclxms.gif Not to mention cheaper as well.
cyberixus
post Aug 1 2011, 11:32 AM

apple newbie
******
Senior Member
1,890 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere between sanity and insanity.
QUOTE(nkarul85 @ Jul 31 2011, 03:24 AM)
mine to tell why u choose 35 ?

sorry, noobs here tongue.gif
*
If we stare directly ahead ... we have an angle of view of roughly 46 degrees.

During 35mm film format days, the 50mm focal length was the most popular of fixed focal length lenses as it provides a 46 degree angle of view.

Full frame or FX format ... same.

In APS-C sized sensor cameras, depending on the crop factor, 35mm focal length x crop factor of 1.5 = 52.5mm .... the closest to getting the 46 degree angle of view.


jchue73
post Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(honkit @ Aug 1 2011, 09:52 AM)
Guys, I currently have an AF-D 80-200. Wanna get a teleconverter for it. As far as i know that nikon teleconverter cannot support AF-D. Do u guys know any other teleconverter for AF-D?
The Kenko 300 Pro DG 1.4x TC will AF with your AF-D lens. Latest Nikon TCs will only work with AF-S tele lenses.

QUOTE(VaLeNrUdOn @ Aug 1 2011, 10:16 AM)
hi guys..newbie here with 5100....can a 50mm f1.4 AF-s work on my camera? or do i have to get the 35mm f1.8?
Both the lenses you mentioned are AF-S type lenses. They should work fine on your D5100.

In fact, just pick any AF-S type lens and you should be fine on your D5100.

QUOTE(azrinarizz @ Aug 1 2011, 10:54 AM)
From what I know, you can either find a nikon TC with those apeture ring on it or use a kenko tc. Kenko allows you to autofocus and many say its sharper than the old nikon tc's  rclxms.gif Not to mention cheaper as well.
I think when comparing the Kenko 1.4x TC and Nikon's 1.4x TC, both are quite equal in terms of sharpness for the centre part with perhaps the Nikon being slightly better. But if compare edge sharpness, the Nikon triumphs. I myself still looking for Nikon's 1.4x TC. I might get it one day since I already have the 1.7x and Nikon's latest 2.0x TC.
yanhui95
post Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM

Already started
******
Senior Member
1,441 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Hello, can you guys recommend me a budget mic for d7000 please?

Thanks
Everdying
post Aug 1 2011, 12:57 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM)
The Kenko 300 Pro DG 1.4x TC will AF with your AF-D lens. Latest Nikon TCs will only work with AF-S tele lenses.
Both the lenses you mentioned are AF-S type lenses. They should work fine on your D5100.

In fact, just pick any AF-S type lens and you should be fine on your D5100.
I think when comparing the Kenko 1.4x TC and Nikon's 1.4x TC, both are quite equal in terms of sharpness for the centre part with perhaps the Nikon being slightly better. But if compare edge sharpness, the Nikon triumphs. I myself still looking for Nikon's 1.4x TC. I might get it one day since I already have the 1.7x and Nikon's latest 2.0x TC.
*
also the nikon fits better.
the kenko there is still some slight movement.
why are u still looking for the 1.4? can find it in shops...or u looking used?
pziv2
post Aug 1 2011, 01:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
551 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(yanhui95 @ Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM)
Hello, can you guys recommend me a budget mic for d7000 please?

Thanks
*
There's the Nikon ME-1. It's small and considerably cheap. You get what you pay for however, it's nowhere as good as those RODE mics but still it's cheaper.
celciuz
post Aug 1 2011, 01:09 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM)
The Kenko 300 Pro DG 1.4x TC will AF with your AF-D lens. Latest Nikon TCs will only work with AF-S tele lenses.
Both the lenses you mentioned are AF-S type lenses. They should work fine on your D5100.

In fact, just pick any AF-S type lens and you should be fine on your D5100.
I think when comparing the Kenko 1.4x TC and Nikon's 1.4x TC, both are quite equal in terms of sharpness for the centre part with perhaps the Nikon being slightly better. But if compare edge sharpness, the Nikon triumphs. I myself still looking for Nikon's 1.4x TC. I might get it one day since I already have the 1.7x and Nikon's latest 2.0x TC.
*
How does the TC-2.0E III perform compared to your 1.7x? Worth buying? Am looking for a TC for the range, 200mm on FX is just.. short.
jchue73
post Aug 1 2011, 01:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 12:57 PM)
also the nikon fits better.
the kenko there is still some slight movement.
You're right. Very very slight play but I'm fine since the Kenko was about RM 500++ when I got it brand new. I think now may be slightly more expensive?

QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 12:57 PM)
why are u still looking for the 1.4? can find it in shops...or u looking used?
The thing is there is no compelling reason to get it at the moment because the Kenko is not bad. I can buy the Nikon now but when would I use it? Hmmm, perhaps MotoGP? I guess I can still take my time.

Just like the 2.0x TC EIII... I got it the day before F1 started because I wanted 600mm reach which I got what I wanted. sweat.gif I actually already have the 2.0x TC but it's the first version which is inferior.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:09 PM)
How does the TC-2.0E III perform compared to your 1.7x? Worth buying? Am looking for a TC for the range, 200mm on FX is just.. short.
Surprisingly, I find that they are about equal in performance which is fine by me. But I read that some people say that the new 2.0x TC is better than 1.7x. Both TCs work best when used about 1 stop down.

The only problem I find with the 2.0x EIII TC is that it slows the AF. But on a super fast 70-200mm f/2.8, should be a fine trade off. Just don't use it on a DX body. The drop in speed is a lot even though mounted on a good DX body. There is a noticeable difference between putting the 2x TC on the D700 and on the D300.
Everdying
post Aug 1 2011, 01:48 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 01:37 PM)
You're right. Very very slight play but I'm fine since the Kenko was about RM 500++ when I got it brand new. I think now may be slightly more expensive?
The thing is there is no compelling reason to get it at the moment because the Kenko is not bad. I can buy the Nikon now but when would I use it? Hmmm, perhaps MotoGP? I guess I can still take my time.

Just like the 2.0x TC EIII... I got it the day before F1 started because I wanted 600mm reach which I got what I wanted.  sweat.gif I actually already have the 2.0x TC but it's the first version which is inferior.
Surprisingly, I find that they are about equal in performance which is fine by me. But I read that some people say that the new 2.0x TC is better than 1.7x. Both TCs work best when used about 1 stop down.

The only problem I find with the 2.0x EIII TC is that it slows the AF. But on a super fast 70-200mm f/2.8, should be a fine trade off. Just don't use it on a DX body. The drop in speed is a lot even though mounted on a good DX body. There is a noticeable difference between putting the 2x TC on the D700 and on the D300.
*
not slightly, more expensive tongue.gif
the cheapest i seen for the pro 1.4 is rm630.
yea the kenko is good enough considering its 1/2 the price of the nikon.
btw, i put the 2.0 tc iii on a d7000, AF speed is still fine...not until terribly slow that it cant track.
celciuz
post Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 01:37 PM)
You're right. Very very slight play but I'm fine since the Kenko was about RM 500++ when I got it brand new. I think now may be slightly more expensive?
The thing is there is no compelling reason to get it at the moment because the Kenko is not bad. I can buy the Nikon now but when would I use it? Hmmm, perhaps MotoGP? I guess I can still take my time.

Just like the 2.0x TC EIII... I got it the day before F1 started because I wanted 600mm reach which I got what I wanted.  sweat.gif I actually already have the 2.0x TC but it's the first version which is inferior.
Surprisingly, I find that they are about equal in performance which is fine by me. But I read that some people say that the new 2.0x TC is better than 1.7x. Both TCs work best when used about 1 stop down.

The only problem I find with the 2.0x EIII TC is that it slows the AF. But on a super fast 70-200mm f/2.8, should be a fine trade off. Just don't use it on a DX body. The drop in speed is a lot even though mounted on a good DX body. There is a noticeable difference between putting the 2x TC on the D700 and on the D300.
*
I plan to use it for birding and also motorsport,

1 stop down, meaning f/2.8 --> f/5.6 after TC. Then 1 more stop down? The next q would be, how much did you paid for it? Wanna know what's street price like.

This post has been edited by celciuz: Aug 1 2011, 01:52 PM
Everdying
post Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM)
I plan to use it for birding and also motorsport,

1 stop down, meaning f/2.8 --> f/5.6 after TC. Then 1 more stop down? The next q would be, how much did you paid for it? Wanna know what's street price like.
*
birding -> digiscoping biggrin.gif

1 stop, meaning after 2.0x tc becomes f/5.6 and then 1 stop to f/8.
i got mine used for rm1.3k still with lots of warranty, the ori receipt says rm1630.
celciuz
post Aug 1 2011, 02:10 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM)
birding -> digiscoping biggrin.gif

1 stop, meaning after 2.0x tc becomes f/5.6 and then 1 stop to f/8.
i got mine used for rm1.3k still with lots of warranty, the ori receipt says rm1630.
*
Hmm, so its about RM1630. Initially I saw the RRP about 1900+ almost 2K. A bit shocked LOL.
jchue73
post Aug 1 2011, 02:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 01:48 PM)
not slightly, more expensive tongue.gif
the cheapest i seen for the pro 1.4 is rm630.
yea the kenko is good enough  considering its 1/2 the price of the nikon.
Aiks... Sudah naik harga?

QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 01:48 PM)
btw, i put the 2.0 tc iii on a d7000, AF speed is still fine...not until terribly slow that it cant track.
On fast tele lenses, it's bearable. But if you use the AF-S 300m f/4 which is already known to have a slow AF-S motor, the slowdown is more evident.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM)
I plan to use it for birding and also motorsport,
400mm maybe fine for motorsport. But not for birding? Please define. biggrin.gif Feathered or non feathered kind?

For feathered type, Malaysian birds are usually very tiny and very shy. So getting close is quite hard.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM)
1 stop down, meaning f/2.8 --> f/5.6 after TC. Then 1 more stop down? The next q would be, how much did you paid for it? Wanna know what's street price like.
Everydying is right. Price? Got it for RM 1.7k for the 2.0x TC EIII.

QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM)
birding -> digiscoping biggrin.gif
Yuks. Digiscoping may get you the distance quite cheaply but the quality is horrible.

QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM)
1 stop, meaning after 2.0x tc becomes f/5.6 and then 1 stop to f/8.
i got mine used for rm1.3k still with lots of warranty, the ori receipt says rm1630.
Whoa, that's a good buy. rclxms.gif Where did you find it?
Everdying
post Aug 1 2011, 02:41 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 02:30 PM)
Aiks... Sudah naik harga?
On fast tele lenses, it's bearable. But if you use the AF-S 300m f/4 which is already known to have a slow AF-S motor, the slowdown is more evident.
400mm maybe fine for motorsport. But not for birding? Please define.  biggrin.gif Feathered or non feathered kind?

For feathered type, Malaysian birds are usually very tiny and very shy. So getting close is quite hard.
Everydying is right. Price? Got it for RM 1.7k for the 2.0x TC EIII.
Yuks. Digiscoping may get you the distance quite cheaply but the quality is horrible.
Whoa, that's a good buy.  rclxms.gif Where did you find it?
*
digiscoping depends how much u willing to spend and whether u hook up pns or dslr.
anyway cheap cheap rm600-rm1k got...get u equivalent of at least 1000mm minimum with the 20x zoom.
nikon optics also got make digiscoping kits, set u back at least rm5k? and sure can get up to 3000mm equivalent cos of the 60x zoom.

i got it used, the guy who bought it got it barely a month ago from d'classic at amcorp mall...the shop thats opposite the starbucks.

ifer
post Aug 1 2011, 03:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


for those who are thinking of getting a D7000 + sb900, don't get it now.
nikon malaysia are giving them out for free.
3 units only though

nikon 10th anniversary

enjoy
vearn27
post Aug 1 2011, 03:52 PM

Doink! Doink! Doink!
*******
Senior Member
7,284 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Hong Kong / Malaysia




QUOTE(ifer @ Aug 1 2011, 03:28 PM)
for those who are thinking of getting a D7000 + sb900, don't get it now.
nikon malaysia are giving them out for free.
3 units only though

nikon 10th anniversary

enjoy
*
Provided you could submit an excellent photo laugh.gif

124 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0216sec    1.08    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:00 AM