QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 09:12 AM)
got top LCD = not beginner body.not beginner body = got AF motor inside
got AF motor inside = can use old lens.
can use old lens = more market / STILL can sell old lens
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 09:25 AM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 09:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,048 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Your Neighbour |
Guys, I currently have an AF-D 80-200. Wanna get a teleconverter for it. As far as i know that nikon teleconverter cannot support AF-D. Do u guys know any other teleconverter for AF-D?
|
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 10:16 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
166 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
hi guys..newbie here with 5100....can a 50mm f1.4 AF-s work on my camera? or do i have to get the 35mm f1.8?
|
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 10:29 AM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 10:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,448 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
QUOTE(honkit @ Aug 1 2011, 09:52 AM) Guys, I currently have an AF-D 80-200. Wanna get a teleconverter for it. As far as i know that nikon teleconverter cannot support AF-D. Do u guys know any other teleconverter for AF-D? From what I know, you can either find a nikon TC with those apeture ring on it or use a kenko tc. Kenko allows you to autofocus and many say its sharper than the old nikon tc's |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 11:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,890 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Somewhere between sanity and insanity. |
QUOTE(nkarul85 @ Jul 31 2011, 03:24 AM) If we stare directly ahead ... we have an angle of view of roughly 46 degrees. During 35mm film format days, the 50mm focal length was the most popular of fixed focal length lenses as it provides a 46 degree angle of view. Full frame or FX format ... same. In APS-C sized sensor cameras, depending on the crop factor, 35mm focal length x crop factor of 1.5 = 52.5mm .... the closest to getting the 46 degree angle of view. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,496 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(honkit @ Aug 1 2011, 09:52 AM) Guys, I currently have an AF-D 80-200. Wanna get a teleconverter for it. As far as i know that nikon teleconverter cannot support AF-D. Do u guys know any other teleconverter for AF-D? The Kenko 300 Pro DG 1.4x TC will AF with your AF-D lens. Latest Nikon TCs will only work with AF-S tele lenses.QUOTE(VaLeNrUdOn @ Aug 1 2011, 10:16 AM) hi guys..newbie here with 5100....can a 50mm f1.4 AF-s work on my camera? or do i have to get the 35mm f1.8? Both the lenses you mentioned are AF-S type lenses. They should work fine on your D5100.In fact, just pick any AF-S type lens and you should be fine on your D5100. QUOTE(azrinarizz @ Aug 1 2011, 10:54 AM) From what I know, you can either find a nikon TC with those apeture ring on it or use a kenko tc. Kenko allows you to autofocus and many say its sharper than the old nikon tc's I think when comparing the Kenko 1.4x TC and Nikon's 1.4x TC, both are quite equal in terms of sharpness for the centre part with perhaps the Nikon being slightly better. But if compare edge sharpness, the Nikon triumphs. I myself still looking for Nikon's 1.4x TC. I might get it one day since I already have the 1.7x and Nikon's latest 2.0x TC. |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,441 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Hello, can you guys recommend me a budget mic for d7000 please?
Thanks |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 12:57 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM) The Kenko 300 Pro DG 1.4x TC will AF with your AF-D lens. Latest Nikon TCs will only work with AF-S tele lenses. also the nikon fits better.Both the lenses you mentioned are AF-S type lenses. They should work fine on your D5100. In fact, just pick any AF-S type lens and you should be fine on your D5100. I think when comparing the Kenko 1.4x TC and Nikon's 1.4x TC, both are quite equal in terms of sharpness for the centre part with perhaps the Nikon being slightly better. But if compare edge sharpness, the Nikon triumphs. I myself still looking for Nikon's 1.4x TC. I might get it one day since I already have the 1.7x and Nikon's latest 2.0x TC. the kenko there is still some slight movement. why are u still looking for the 1.4? can find it in shops...or u looking used? |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 01:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
551 posts Joined: Nov 2009 |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 01:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 12:25 PM) The Kenko 300 Pro DG 1.4x TC will AF with your AF-D lens. Latest Nikon TCs will only work with AF-S tele lenses. How does the TC-2.0E III perform compared to your 1.7x? Worth buying? Am looking for a TC for the range, 200mm on FX is just.. short.Both the lenses you mentioned are AF-S type lenses. They should work fine on your D5100. In fact, just pick any AF-S type lens and you should be fine on your D5100. I think when comparing the Kenko 1.4x TC and Nikon's 1.4x TC, both are quite equal in terms of sharpness for the centre part with perhaps the Nikon being slightly better. But if compare edge sharpness, the Nikon triumphs. I myself still looking for Nikon's 1.4x TC. I might get it one day since I already have the 1.7x and Nikon's latest 2.0x TC. |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 01:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,496 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 12:57 PM) also the nikon fits better. You're right. Very very slight play but I'm fine since the Kenko was about RM 500++ when I got it brand new. I think now may be slightly more expensive?the kenko there is still some slight movement. QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 12:57 PM) why are u still looking for the 1.4? can find it in shops...or u looking used? The thing is there is no compelling reason to get it at the moment because the Kenko is not bad. I can buy the Nikon now but when would I use it? Hmmm, perhaps MotoGP? I guess I can still take my time.Just like the 2.0x TC EIII... I got it the day before F1 started because I wanted 600mm reach which I got what I wanted. QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:09 PM) How does the TC-2.0E III perform compared to your 1.7x? Worth buying? Am looking for a TC for the range, 200mm on FX is just.. short. Surprisingly, I find that they are about equal in performance which is fine by me. But I read that some people say that the new 2.0x TC is better than 1.7x. Both TCs work best when used about 1 stop down.The only problem I find with the 2.0x EIII TC is that it slows the AF. But on a super fast 70-200mm f/2.8, should be a fine trade off. Just don't use it on a DX body. The drop in speed is a lot even though mounted on a good DX body. There is a noticeable difference between putting the 2x TC on the D700 and on the D300. |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 01:48 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 01:37 PM) You're right. Very very slight play but I'm fine since the Kenko was about RM 500++ when I got it brand new. I think now may be slightly more expensive? not slightly, more expensive The thing is there is no compelling reason to get it at the moment because the Kenko is not bad. I can buy the Nikon now but when would I use it? Hmmm, perhaps MotoGP? I guess I can still take my time. Just like the 2.0x TC EIII... I got it the day before F1 started because I wanted 600mm reach which I got what I wanted. Surprisingly, I find that they are about equal in performance which is fine by me. But I read that some people say that the new 2.0x TC is better than 1.7x. Both TCs work best when used about 1 stop down. The only problem I find with the 2.0x EIII TC is that it slows the AF. But on a super fast 70-200mm f/2.8, should be a fine trade off. Just don't use it on a DX body. The drop in speed is a lot even though mounted on a good DX body. There is a noticeable difference between putting the 2x TC on the D700 and on the D300. the cheapest i seen for the pro 1.4 is rm630. yea the kenko is good enough considering its 1/2 the price of the nikon. btw, i put the 2.0 tc iii on a d7000, AF speed is still fine...not until terribly slow that it cant track. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 01:37 PM) You're right. Very very slight play but I'm fine since the Kenko was about RM 500++ when I got it brand new. I think now may be slightly more expensive? I plan to use it for birding and also motorsport, The thing is there is no compelling reason to get it at the moment because the Kenko is not bad. I can buy the Nikon now but when would I use it? Hmmm, perhaps MotoGP? I guess I can still take my time. Just like the 2.0x TC EIII... I got it the day before F1 started because I wanted 600mm reach which I got what I wanted. Surprisingly, I find that they are about equal in performance which is fine by me. But I read that some people say that the new 2.0x TC is better than 1.7x. Both TCs work best when used about 1 stop down. The only problem I find with the 2.0x EIII TC is that it slows the AF. But on a super fast 70-200mm f/2.8, should be a fine trade off. Just don't use it on a DX body. The drop in speed is a lot even though mounted on a good DX body. There is a noticeable difference between putting the 2x TC on the D700 and on the D300. 1 stop down, meaning f/2.8 --> f/5.6 after TC. Then 1 more stop down? The next q would be, how much did you paid for it? Wanna know what's street price like. This post has been edited by celciuz: Aug 1 2011, 01:52 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM) I plan to use it for birding and also motorsport, birding -> digiscoping 1 stop down, meaning f/2.8 --> f/5.6 after TC. Then 1 more stop down? The next q would be, how much did you paid for it? Wanna know what's street price like. 1 stop, meaning after 2.0x tc becomes f/5.6 and then 1 stop to f/8. i got mine used for rm1.3k still with lots of warranty, the ori receipt says rm1630. |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 02:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM) birding -> digiscoping Hmm, so its about RM1630. Initially I saw the RRP about 1900+ almost 2K. A bit shocked LOL.1 stop, meaning after 2.0x tc becomes f/5.6 and then 1 stop to f/8. i got mine used for rm1.3k still with lots of warranty, the ori receipt says rm1630. |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 02:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,496 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 01:48 PM) not slightly, more expensive Aiks... Sudah naik harga?the cheapest i seen for the pro 1.4 is rm630. yea the kenko is good enough considering its 1/2 the price of the nikon. QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 01:48 PM) btw, i put the 2.0 tc iii on a d7000, AF speed is still fine...not until terribly slow that it cant track. On fast tele lenses, it's bearable. But if you use the AF-S 300m f/4 which is already known to have a slow AF-S motor, the slowdown is more evident.QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM) I plan to use it for birding and also motorsport, 400mm maybe fine for motorsport. But not for birding? Please define. For feathered type, Malaysian birds are usually very tiny and very shy. So getting close is quite hard. QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 1 2011, 01:51 PM) 1 stop down, meaning f/2.8 --> f/5.6 after TC. Then 1 more stop down? The next q would be, how much did you paid for it? Wanna know what's street price like. Everydying is right. Price? Got it for RM 1.7k for the 2.0x TC EIII.QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM) birding -> digiscoping Yuks. Digiscoping may get you the distance quite cheaply but the quality is horrible.QUOTE(Everdying @ Aug 1 2011, 02:07 PM) 1 stop, meaning after 2.0x tc becomes f/5.6 and then 1 stop to f/8. Whoa, that's a good buy. i got mine used for rm1.3k still with lots of warranty, the ori receipt says rm1630. |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 02:41 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 1 2011, 02:30 PM) Aiks... Sudah naik harga? digiscoping depends how much u willing to spend and whether u hook up pns or dslr.On fast tele lenses, it's bearable. But if you use the AF-S 300m f/4 which is already known to have a slow AF-S motor, the slowdown is more evident. 400mm maybe fine for motorsport. But not for birding? Please define. For feathered type, Malaysian birds are usually very tiny and very shy. So getting close is quite hard. Everydying is right. Price? Got it for RM 1.7k for the 2.0x TC EIII. Yuks. Digiscoping may get you the distance quite cheaply but the quality is horrible. Whoa, that's a good buy. anyway cheap cheap rm600-rm1k got...get u equivalent of at least 1000mm minimum with the 20x zoom. nikon optics also got make digiscoping kits, set u back at least rm5k? and sure can get up to 3000mm equivalent cos of the 60x zoom. i got it used, the guy who bought it got it barely a month ago from d'classic at amcorp mall...the shop thats opposite the starbucks. |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 03:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
for those who are thinking of getting a D7000 + sb900, don't get it now.
nikon malaysia are giving them out for free. 3 units only though nikon 10th anniversary enjoy |
|
|
Aug 1 2011, 03:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,284 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Hong Kong / Malaysia |
QUOTE(ifer @ Aug 1 2011, 03:28 PM) for those who are thinking of getting a D7000 + sb900, don't get it now. Provided you could submit an excellent photo nikon malaysia are giving them out for free. 3 units only though nikon 10th anniversary enjoy |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0216sec
1.08
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:00 AM |