Same things happened to Grado cans. They are cheap looking, they give cheap feeling...but it's definitely not a junk as Sichiri said
Even local mooncake packaging are 2-3 times better than grado's. The plastic material on grado is something you can find from those cheapskate plastic toys, but solid. The finishing is a big let down if you look at the build inch by inch.
Most of my friends who know nothing about grado thought I was crazy paying RM8xx for HF-1. I must agree that judged by the grado-look it should be priced not more than RM100. But grado cans teach us not to judge a book by its cover...
Once these cans are on their head, they were quite amazed by the sound it produced. The sound quality even on par with Sennheiser cans for the same price range. So it's not surprised that Senn vs Grado topics have been greatly discussed in head-fi forum til now.
Personally I like the retro Grado design. IMO retro is the trend that fashion industry is die for nowadays. Watch Madonna Hung up MTV and you will have a good picture of how old skool looks like.
No, I'm not a Grado fanboy

. In fact, my HF-1 is in the FS forum and should be gone very soon.
QUOTE(DAViS @ Dec 3 2005, 03:09 AM)
Don't compare here and there like lack of bass, lack of mid, lack of treble, before you want to get a speaker or headphone you must understand the how the manufacturer fit themselves in audio world.
FYI... look at the Rogers ls 3/5, when you have a look on it and their technical specs you can ptui to it but look at the price tag and audiophile siao kia praise it you will understand that. That is music, different country, different culture and different education may appreciate different type of music to suit their taste.