deleted*
This post has been edited by daze: Jan 27 2011, 10:46 AM
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 10:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
857 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
deleted*
This post has been edited by daze: Jan 27 2011, 10:46 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 10:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Most thing from D7000 will be there. 2016, new sensor, new AF module and etc
This post has been edited by KTCY: Jan 27 2011, 11:15 AM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
18-70 :0
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
guys if you have kit lens 18-55 and so happen you bought wide converter with a high price (e.g RM700) <- silly me.
and I am thinking to grab 17-50 tamron. what will you do? will you sell it 1st then use your tamron only (knowing the fact kit lens is good for wide angle) or you will keep both one for wide combo plus wide converter and another one tamron for normal purpose lens? Confuse This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 27 2011, 11:49 AM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Option 1, use Tamron only. I don't think you would even use the 1855 once you get the Tamron.
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 27 2011, 01:04 AM) If you shoot raw, your raw file will have none of those settings applied. The first thing you will notice if you do shoot raw is... there is NO NOISE REDUCTION applied. So,... yea, you have more things to PP. Glad you mentioned about this ! Nope, the bigger the aperture, the easier to know the problem. The smaller aperture will have more in focus, covers more depth, so it's harder to tell. If you want to do proper focus test, you will need to use tripod and do serious test to know. For basic test without tripod, you can put the camera on the table, line up the batteries, or put a book with wordings 45 degrees, etc. open to the widest aperture and focus and shoot, make sure the camera and object doesn't move. Take several shots, review the pictures and see. Example: -|------ --|----- ---|---- ----|--- -----|--- ---C--- C = Camera | = Batteries or other objects, or book/paper with words in 45 degrees If you're handholding and shooting in f/1.4 or 1/1.8, you might not doing it properly where you or the camera might have moved just a little and the actual focus depth/plane changed when you press/release the shutter, resulting in inaccurate test. If you have time, watch this video tutorial and how this guy test: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I never know noise reduction is not applicable when shooting in RAW. Thanks ! |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 27 2011, 11:41 AM) That's what I doubt as well. but selling them is a very hard task. anyway CY. do you think VR in range of 17-50 is a necessity? This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 27 2011, 11:56 AM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Hmm, I don't have any lens with that range. My experience with 2470 does not require VR.
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 11:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 27 2011, 11:52 AM) Typo. I mean 17-50. Considering tamron between VC and non-VC.since 24-70 VR is not required. I will go for non-VC instead. selling kitty yay This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 27 2011, 11:58 AM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 12:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 27 2011, 11:50 AM) That's what I doubt as well. but selling them is a very hard task. Try to search dpreview forum and photomalaysia see. Some said yes some said no. Ask Kent lo he is using. =Danyway CY. do you think VR in range of 17-50 is a necessity? I see Canon thread, they got discussed about it before. Im using D3100 , but i wont get tamron 17-50 f2.8 at least for now because i like prime ><" For wide angle i would go for 10-24mm nikkor for non-autofocus motor For DX like d90 i would go for tokia 11-16 QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 27 2011, 11:41 AM) Me too . tamron 17-50 can replace you kit len d. IMOThis post has been edited by bbuser91: Jan 27 2011, 12:18 PM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 12:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Jan 27 2011, 12:15 PM) Try to search dpreview forum and photomalaysia see. Some said yes some said no. Ask Kent lo he is using. =D yeah I also like prime but you can't shoot only with 50mm prime don't you?I see Canon thread, they got discussed about it before. Im using D3100 , but i wont get tamron 17-50 f2.8 at least for now because i like prime ><" For wide angle i would go for 10-24mm nikkor for non-autofocus motor For DX like d90 i would go for tokia 11-16 Added on January 27, 2011, 12:18 pm Try to search dpreview forum and photomalaysia see. Some said yes some said no. Ask Kent lo he is using. =D I see Canon thread, they got discussed about it before. Im using D3100 , but i wont get tamron 17-50 f2.8 For wide angle i would go for 10-24mm nikkor for non-autofocus motor For DX like d90 i would go for tokia 11-16 Me too . tamron 17-50 can replace you kit len d. IMO moreover budget-wise prime is far more costly. I am waiting for kent to pop-up |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 12:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,966 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: Macross Galaxy |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 12:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,333 posts Joined: May 2009 From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI |
I'm using VC n I love it.... haha..... VC vs non-VC, I would juz grab the VC coz of the function, don care sharpness 1st, juz try handheld indoor without high iso, shoot on some words at distance n see
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0266sec
0.69
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 09:45 AM |