
only 228 though
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 05:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Mine is this one
![]() only 228 though |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 05:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,580 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Melaka, Singapore |
my most view
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 05:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,515 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
my most clicks is about 30k pluz
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 05:45 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 05:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,580 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Melaka, Singapore |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 06:48 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
hi, anyone here manage to reset their file numbering on D7000? asking behalf of my friend... she wans it reset back to 0000, but even formating the card or even adding a new card, the numbering continues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 07:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Read the manual, there's one part about file number sequence. I can't recall which section it is in. It is best to leave the number running, no need to worry having duplicate file names and end up overwritting when copying to PC.
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 07:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,095 posts Joined: Apr 2010 From: Oggie Oggie Oggie!!! |
hey guys im wondering how much will a 18-105mm kit lens worth? its only a month condition 10/10...
planning to let go and upgrade to a better lens |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 08:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
857 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
SGD300-350
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 08:12 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
10 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Johor Bahru |
To those who don't know yet, new firmware for D3100 have been released.
http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/de...vcmdBa2YxbGs%3D |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 08:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: shah alam |
the focus test is for the lens only or is body also matter?
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 08:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 09:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,021 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Penang Island, Alor Star |
QUOTE(wmhafiz @ Jan 26 2011, 08:12 PM) To those who don't know yet, new firmware for D3100 have been released. ooh cool. http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/de...vcmdBa2YxbGs%3D list of fixes (taken from the link): » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by mmohdnor: Jan 26 2011, 09:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 09:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 10:10 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(ieR @ Jan 26 2011, 06:48 PM) hi, anyone here manage to reset their file numbering on D7000? asking behalf of my friend... she wans it reset back to 0000, but even formating the card or even adding a new card, the numbering continues. celciuz: yea, found it, thanks. we all thought it suppose to be at the same area as the formatcard menu, who would know its inside the camera control menu, D8 |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 01:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 26 2011, 10:32 AM) No youtube access bro If you shoot raw, your raw file will have none of those settings applied. The first thing you will notice if you do shoot raw is... there is NO NOISE REDUCTION applied. So,... yea, you have more things to PP.later on I will go back to this. Sorry la bro. really I go trough each main section of my manual but none of them saying if it is overwrite-able as it you can boost the sharpness, saturation etc etc.. it will shorten the long time of PP. QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 26 2011, 02:01 PM) But problem with that 45 degree is that lens with maximum aperture 3.5 above give you result that is very hard to read whether there is any front or back focusing. Nope, the bigger the aperture, the easier to know the problem. The smaller aperture will have more in focus, covers more depth, so it's harder to tell.Also, 1.8 aperture sometimes can give you soft image thus it is even harder to tell about the focus issue. Try to do the battery test if you find yourself unable to judge the focus problem. If you want to do proper focus test, you will need to use tripod and do serious test to know. For basic test without tripod, you can put the camera on the table, line up the batteries, or put a book with wordings 45 degrees, etc. open to the widest aperture and focus and shoot, make sure the camera and object doesn't move. Take several shots, review the pictures and see. Example: -|------ --|----- ---|---- ----|--- -----|--- ---C--- C = Camera | = Batteries or other objects, or book/paper with words in 45 degrees If you're handholding and shooting in f/1.4 or 1/1.8, you might not doing it properly where you or the camera might have moved just a little and the actual focus depth/plane changed when you press/release the shutter, resulting in inaccurate test. If you have time, watch this video tutorial and how this guy test: Part 1: Part 2: This post has been edited by Andy214: Jan 27 2011, 01:06 AM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 01:15 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 27 2011, 01:04 AM) If you shoot raw, your raw file will have none of those settings applied. The first thing you will notice if you do shoot raw is... there is NO NOISE REDUCTION applied. So,... yea, you have more things to PP. Nope, what I mean is at the widest aperture, it is usually not the sharpest(image look soft and hazy) and mostly very hard to get the focus lock on as the DOF is too shallow. Nope, the bigger the aperture, the easier to know the problem. The smaller aperture will have more in focus, covers more depth, so it's harder to tell. If you want to do proper focus test, you will need to use tripod and do serious test to know. For basic test without tripod, you can put the camera on the table, line up the batteries, or put a book with wordings 45 degrees, etc. open to the widest aperture and focus and shoot, make sure the camera and object doesn't move. Take several shots, review the pictures and see. Example: -|------ --|----- ---|---- ----|--- -----|--- ---C--- C = Camera | = Batteries or other objects, or book/paper with words in 45 degrees If you're handholding and shooting in f/1.4 or 1/1.8, you might not doing it properly where you or the camera might have moved just a little and the actual focus depth/plane changed when you press/release the shutter, resulting in inaccurate test. If you have time, watch this video tutorial and how this guy test: Part 1: Part 2: This post has been edited by pikipiki: Jan 27 2011, 01:39 AM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 01:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 27 2011, 01:15 AM) Nope, what I mean is at the widest aperture, it is usually not the sharpest(image look soft and hazy) and mostly very hard to get the focus lock on as the DOP is too shallow. That's the point of opening to wides aperture, for the shallow depth of field so that you can easily pin point which area front or back focus problem. With small aperture, it's harder to differentiate due to the more depth of field covered. Most people face front or back focusing problem when the aperture is wide open, because they focus on the eyes, but end up the nose or hand, etc is in focus. With smaller aperture, you hardly have such problem. Unless you wanna do sharpness test for the lens, such as MTF chart, to find out the sharpness at each focal length for each aperture... This post has been edited by Andy214: Jan 27 2011, 01:36 AM |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 01:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,227 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
Guys, rare turtle..snapped at one of beaches in Kemaman, Terengganu..
Snapped wif D90.. ![]() |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 01:42 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 27 2011, 01:35 AM) That's the point of opening to wides aperture, for the shallow depth of field so that you can easily pin point which area front or back focus problem. With small aperture, it's harder to differentiate due to the more depth of field covered. Haha, you still don't get it, at the widest aperture the image out of the camera is too soft and hazy(often lack of contrast too), it is too hard to judge about the focus, normally you need to go down 1 f-stop to get the image sharper so as to see the result and easily able to tell the focus issue.Most people face front or back focusing problem when the aperture is wide open, because they focus on the eyes, but end up the nose or hand, etc is in focus. With smaller aperture, you hardly have such problem. Unless you wanna do sharpness test for the lens, such as MTF chart, to find out the sharpness at each focal length for each aperture... Added on January 27, 2011, 1:43 am QUOTE(skycrawler @ Jan 27 2011, 01:39 AM) Wow your lens has super back focus problem Joking! This post has been edited by pikipiki: Jan 27 2011, 01:43 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0280sec
0.50
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 10:56 AM |